United States — March 16, 2026

NCUA Proposed Merger of Ascent and Goldenwest Credit Unions

The National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) is seeking public comment on the proposed merger of Ascent Credit Union and Goldenwest Credit Union. This consultation period allows stakeholders to provide input on the potential consolidation of these financial institutions.

Ascent Federal Credit Union Member Notice

The National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) has posted a member notice from Ascent Federal Credit Union. This notice was posted on March 16, 2026, and is available for public review and comment via Regs.gov.

CCI Network Services Registration and Competitive Classification

The Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission (UTC) has closed the docket for CCI Network Services, LLC's registration and competitive classification. The filing type was Registration, and the status is now Closed.

M.S. v. A.L. - Domestic Violence Restraining Order Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division Five, issued a non-precedential opinion in M.S. v. A.L. The court dismissed the appeal, finding neither the denial of a new trial motion nor the vexatious litigant order to be appealable. This case involves a domestic violence restraining order.

People v. Torres - Criminal Appeal Modification

The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Five, has modified a non-precedential opinion in the case of People v. Torres. The modification concerns the factual background of the defendant's conviction, specifically the date and number of offenses. The judgment remains unchanged.

People v. Mohammed - Criminal Conviction Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Six, issued a non-precedential opinion in People v. Mohammed on March 16, 2026. The case concerns an appeal of a post-judgment order denying a petition to vacate a first-degree murder conviction based on a felony-murder theory.

Crane v. Dolihite - CA Court of Appeal Non-Precedential Opinion

The California Court of Appeal, Fifth Appellate District, issued a non-precedential opinion in Crane v. Dolihite. The court dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, affirming the trial court's order to not file further documents from the plaintiff.

In re S.D. - California Court of Appeal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Six, affirmed an order modifying a prior visitation and reunification services order in the case of In re S.D. The court found no abuse of discretion in determining that continued visitation would be detrimental to the child.

People v. Dunn - California Court of Appeal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal affirmed the convictions of Morgan James Dunn for unlawful firearm and ammunition possession. Dunn appealed based on alleged instructional errors regarding circumstantial evidence and unanimity instructions.

People v. Tovar - Criminal Conviction Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Six, affirmed the conviction of Jasinto Tovar for procuring or offering a false or forged instrument and falsifying a certificate. Tovar was placed on probation for two years, including 120 days in county jail.

Domestic Partnership of Campos & Munoz - Court Opinion Modification

The California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, modified an opinion in the domestic partnership case of Campos & Munoz. The modification clarifies judicial responsibilities regarding the verification of AI-generated content in submitted materials, referencing new judicial administration standards.

People v. Holloway - Criminal Threat Conviction Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, affirmed the judgment in People v. Holloway. The case involved a defendant charged with making criminal threats and admitting to a prior strike offense, resulting in a 32-month sentence.

In re O.B. - California Court of Appeal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division One, issued a non-precedential opinion in the case of In re O.B. The case involves a mother appealing a juvenile court order requiring her to undergo a psychological evaluation.

People v. Medina - Criminal Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, affirmed the superior court's denial of a Penal Code section 1172.6 petition for resentencing filed by defendant Francisco Javier Medina. The court found the petition was properly denied at the prima facie stage.

People v. Pavia - Criminal Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Six, affirmed the conviction of Daniel A. Rodriguez Pavia for rape. The court rejected Pavia's argument that a four-year pre-charging delay prejudiced his defense.

People v. Majstoric - Criminal Appeal

The California Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District, Division Six, reversed a judgment against Branko Alexander Majstoric. The court agreed that Majstoric should have the opportunity to withdraw his no contest plea due to sentencing discrepancies.

People v. Mitchell - Youth Offender Parole Hearing Denial

The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Six, affirmed the trial court's denial of Gregory Dean Mitchell's motion for a youth offender parole hearing. Mitchell, convicted of murder and robbery in 1999, argued for an equal protection right to such a hearing. The court found he was 18 at the time of the offense, rendering him ineligible under current law.

People v. Riggs - Criminal Conviction Appeal

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a criminal conviction for Rodney Herbert Riggs, Jr. The court rejected claims regarding insufficient evidence and ineffective assistance of counsel. The opinion was filed on March 16, 2026.

In re R.J. - Appeal of Termination of Parental Rights

The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Six, issued an opinion in the case of In re R.J. The appeal concerns the termination of parental rights and the applicability of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA). The court affirmed the juvenile court's order.

Clapkin v. Levin - California Court of Appeal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal affirmed an order denying a motion to strike, finding that the cross-complaint's causes of action arose from an underlying dispute rather than protected litigation activity. The court also dismissed an appeal from an order denying attorneys' fees.

People v. Herrera - Criminal Conviction Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Six, affirmed the conviction of Ernesto Nava Herrera for second-degree murder and other offenses related to a fatal DUI collision. The court found sufficient evidence for implied malice murder and upheld the jury instructions.

In re S.P. - Child Dependency Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division Five, affirmed a dependency court's jurisdictional ruling in the case of In re S.P. The appeal concerned allegations of substantial risk of serious physical harm to a child due to the mother's alleged inability to protect him, stemming from prior referrals and a sibling's report.

People v. Cesena - Criminal Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Six, affirmed the judgment against Janine Laurice Cesena for assault with a deadly weapon and inflicting great bodily injury. The court found no arguable issues upon independent review of the record.

Texas Jobs Council Inaugural Meeting

Governor Greg Abbott hosted the inaugural meeting of the Texas Jobs Council, a new initiative to bolster the state's workforce and align development efforts with industry needs. The Texas Workforce Commission will provide administrative support and research for the Council.

Bitcoin Depot Operating LLC Administrative Order

The Connecticut Department of Banking has added a new administrative order for Bitcoin Depot Operating LLC, dated March 9. This action pertains to the company formerly known as LUX Vending LLC.

CA AG Sues HUD to Block Guidance Weakening Fair Housing Protections

California Attorney General Rob Bonta, leading a coalition of 16 attorneys general, has filed a lawsuit against HUD to block guidance that weakens fair housing protections. The guidance threatens to decertify state and local agencies that enforce protections beyond the federal Fair Housing Act, impacting complaint referrals and funding.

AG Bonta, 20 AGs Oppose EV Charging Funding Halt

California Attorney General Rob Bonta joined 20 other state attorneys general in opposing a Federal Highway Administration proposal that would halt federal funding for electric vehicle charging equipment. The proposal would impose an unachievable 100% domestic component requirement for EV chargers, impacting approximately $460 million in California funding.

AG Joins Amicus Brief Defending EPA's Lead and Copper Rule Improvements

California Attorney General Rob Bonta joined a multistate coalition in filing an amicus brief supporting the EPA's Lead and Copper Rule Improvements. The brief defends the rule's strengthened requirements to reduce lead exposure from drinking water, including a 10-year lead pipe replacement mandate, against a legal challenge.

CA AG Urges Supreme Court to Deny TPS Termination for Haitians

California Attorney General Rob Bonta co-led an amicus brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to deny the Trump Administration's request to terminate Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haitians. The brief opposes the termination, which was set to be effective February 3, 2026, and would impact hundreds of thousands nationwide.

AG Bonta, States Continue Fighting Live Nation/Ticketmaster Resolution

California Attorney General Rob Bonta and a coalition of states are returning to court to continue their antitrust trial against Live Nation and Ticketmaster. The states are seeking a better resolution than the one recently settled by the U.S. Department of Justice, aiming to hold Live Nation accountable for anticompetitive practices that harm consumers and the live music industry.

Texas AG Authority to Issue Civil Investigative Demands Affirmed

The Texas Supreme Court ruled in favor of Attorney General Ken Paxton, reaffirming the Office of the Attorney General's authority to issue civil investigative demands (CIDs) under the Deceptive Trade Practices Act. This decision allows the AG's office to obtain relevant documents for investigations into potential violations of Texas law, specifically in cases involving deceptive billing practices related to gender transition procedures for minors.

Texas AG Secures Order Blocking Oklahoma Owner from Texas Land

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton secured a court order dismissing a lawsuit filed by an Oklahoma property owner attempting to claim Texas land along the Red River. The court ruled in favor of Texas, upholding the boundary established by the Red River Boundary Compact and dismissing the case on sovereign immunity grounds.

USDA APHIS Facilitates Return of Burrowing Owls

The USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) announced the successful repatriation of two burrowing owls that were accidentally shipped from Florida to Spain. APHIS coordinated with international partners to ensure the birds' safe return and quarantine.

Louisiana v. Jermeil Young - Affirmation of Denial of Batson Challenge

The Louisiana Court of Appeal affirmed a district court's decision denying a Batson challenge in the case of Louisiana v. Jermeil Young. The court found the State's reason for striking a prospective juror was race-neutral. The decision was issued on March 13, 2026.

Louisiana v. Bain - Criminal Case Opinion

The Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit, issued an opinion in the criminal case State of Louisiana v. Anthony J. Bain. The court denied supervisory writs related to docket number 2026 KW 0350. The precedential status of the opinion is unknown.

Louisiana v. Tremel Boss - Criminal Case Appeal

The Louisiana Court of Appeal granted a writ and reversed a previous judgment in the case of Louisiana v. Tremel Boss. The docket number for this case is 2026-K-0026. One judge dissented, stating they would have denied the writ application.

State of Louisiana v. Melanie Barnett Curtin - Expert Witness Testimony

The Louisiana Court of Appeal granted in part and denied in part a writ regarding the admissibility of expert testimony in the State of Louisiana v. Melanie Barnett Curtin case. The court reversed the trial court's exclusion of general testimony regarding the behavior of intoxicated individuals, remanding the matter for further proceedings.

State of Louisiana v. Tremel Boss - Criminal Procedure

The Louisiana Court of Appeal granted the State's writ application, reversing a lower court's ruling that found no probable cause and granted a motion to suppress evidence. The case involves the arrest of Tremel Boss during a parade.

Candice Henderson-Chandler v. City of New Orleans - Zoning Appeal

The Louisiana Court of Appeal reversed a lower court's judgment in Candice Henderson-Chandler v. City of New Orleans. The appellate court found the City Council's denial of a conditional use permit was arbitrary and capricious. This decision impacts the City of New Orleans' zoning and land-use adjudication processes.

B9 Schoolhouse Owner, LLC v. Township of Franklin - Land Use Ordinance Appeal

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division heard an appeal concerning Franklin Township Ordinance 4419-23, which retroactively applied new stormwater management regulations to pending development applications. The court's decision addresses the validity of this retroactive application.

State of New Jersey v. A.N.A. - Criminal Appeal

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed a defendant's convictions for sexual assault and endangering the welfare of a child. The court addressed challenges related to the admission of testimonial evidence and the sentence imposed.

State of New Jersey v. Byad Lockett - Criminal Appeal

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division has issued a non-precedential opinion in the case of State of New Jersey v. Byad Lockett. The court affirmed the defendant's convictions and sentence for attempted murder, aggravated assault, and weapons possession.

U.S. Bank Trust v. Harinder Singh - Foreclosure Appeal Dismissal

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division has dismissed an appeal in U.S. Bank Trust National Association v. Harinder Singh. The appeal concerned a foreclosure judgment that was subsequently vacated and the underlying action dismissed, rendering the appeal moot.

Krg Bayonne Urban Renewal LLC v. Wal-Mart Stores East Lp - Lease Dispute

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division reversed a lower court's decision regarding an exclusivity provision in a commercial lease between KRG Bayonne Urban Renewal, LLC and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP. The court found that KRG's lease with Aldi for a supermarket violated the exclusivity clause.

Paradigm Hedge, LLC v. Mary Ann Folchetti - Legal Opinion

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division reviewed an order awarding attorney's fees. While affirming the principle of awarding fees due to a contractual default, the court remanded the case to modify the fee amount, limiting it to work directly related to obtaining the judgment.

Dcpp v. B.C. - Child Protection and Permanency Case

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division issued a non-precedential opinion in the case of DCPP v. B.C., concerning the matter of A.S.C. The appeal addresses orders related to legal and psychological parent status and the naming of parties in family guardianship litigation.

Hester v. Bargman - Medical Malpractice Case Dismissal

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed the dismissal of a medical malpractice complaint filed by Valerie Karl Hester against Dr. Vladislav Bargman and associated entities. The dismissal was based on the plaintiff's failure to appear for trial.

Goni v. Tchistiakova - Child Support Modification Appeal

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division reversed a Family Part order modifying child support. The court found insufficient findings on changed circumstances, remanding the case for further proceedings. The appeal concerned a downward modification of plaintiff's child support obligation.

Miller v. Lamanna - Appeal of Dismissal for Failure to State a Claim

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a district court's dismissal of a former corrections officer's discrimination and retaliation claims. The appellate court found the district court erred by converting a summary judgment motion into a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss, considering only the complaint's allegations.

Care One, LLC v. NLRB - Court Opinion on Unfair Labor Practice Proceedings

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's denial of a preliminary injunction sought by Care One, LLC and affiliated healthcare facilities. The facilities challenged NLRB proceedings for alleged unfair labor practices, arguing the ALJ was improperly appointed. The court found the plaintiffs could not demonstrate irreparable harm, thus affirming the denial of injunctive relief.

2nd Circuit Opinion: Bondholders v. Republic of Argentina

The 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion in the case of bondholders suing the Republic of Argentina for defaulted principal payments. The court affirmed in part and vacated in part the district court's judgment, remanding for further proceedings regarding the timeliness and enforceability of certain bond claims.

GEICO v. Mayzenberg - Insurance No-Fault Benefits Dispute

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a district court judgment in favor of GEICO in GEICO v. Mayzenberg. The court found that under New York law, an insurer cannot deny no-fault medical benefits based solely on alleged professional misconduct that does not involve ceding control of a professional services corporation to an unlicensed party. The case is remanded for further proceedings.

Sacaza v. City of New York - Qualified Immunity Ruling

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a district court's denial of summary judgment for a New York City detective in a false arrest and malicious prosecution case. The court found that arguable probable cause existed, granting the detective qualified immunity on federal claims.

Jin v. City of New York - Qualified Immunity for False Arrest Claim

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a district court's denial of qualified immunity to NYPD officers in a false arrest case. The court found that officers had arguable probable cause to arrest Guo Hua Jin, overturning the district court's decision and granting immunity.

Court of Appeals Decision on Asylum and CAT Claim

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals granted in part a petition for review concerning asylum and Convention Against Torture (CAT) claims. The court remanded the case to the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) to determine eligibility for asylum and withholding of removal, excluding the material support bar. The petition for review of the CAT claim was denied.

US v. Aryeetey - Affirmation of Conviction and Sentence

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction and sentence of Ivanjoel Aryeetey for being a felon in possession of a firearm. The court found no abuse of discretion in the admission of DNA evidence and deemed the sentence substantively reasonable.

Kellogg v. Nichols - Judicial Immunity in Firearms Licensing

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals amended its opinion in Kellogg v. Nichols, affirming the dismissal of a lawsuit challenging New York's firearms licensing laws. The court held that state court judges are absolutely immune from individual-capacity suits and that federal jurisdiction is barred by Article III's case-or-controversy requirement for official-capacity claims.

US v. Cardenas - Conspiracy to Import Cocaine

The Second Circuit vacated a conviction for conspiracy to import cocaine, finding that the district court erred in excluding evidence relevant to the defendant's state of mind. The court remanded the case for further proceedings, potentially impacting how intent is proven in similar drug conspiracy cases.

Mar-Can Transport vs. Pension Fund - ERISA Withdrawal Liability

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court ruling, reducing Mar-Can Transportation Company's withdrawal liability from the Local 854 Pension Fund by $1.8 million. The decision clarifies the interpretation of an ERISA provision concerning the transfer of unfunded vested benefits when employees switch unions.

2nd Circuit Opinion on Housing Discrimination Case

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion in a housing discrimination case involving CoreLogic Rental Property Solutions. The court vacated in part, affirmed in part, and reversed in part the district court's decision, impacting claims under the Fair Housing Act and Fair Credit Reporting Act.

Broadcast Music, Inc. v. North American Concert Promoters Association - Antitrust

The 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a district court's decision regarding music licensing fees set by Broadcast Music, Inc. (BMI) for the North American Concert Promoters Association (NACPA). The court found the imposed rates and expanded definition of gross revenues to be unreasonable and remanded the case for further proceedings.

US v. Jiminez - Affirming Sentence for Ammunition Possession

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's judgment sentencing William Jimenez to 105 months imprisonment for felony ammunition possession. The court found that the special conditions of supervised release, including electronic device searches and mental health counseling, were justified and that Jimenez's appeal waiver barred his challenge to the sentence term.

Safdieh v. Commissioner - Tax Penalties Assessment Authority

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a Tax Court decision, holding that the Commissioner of Internal Revenue can assess penalties for failure to report foreign business control. This decision clarifies the IRS's authority to collect penalties under I.R.C. § 6038(b) through administrative assessment rather than requiring a federal district court judgment.

SBK ART LLC v. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP - Discovery for Foreign Litigation

The Second Circuit affirmed a district court's order granting SBK ART LLC's petition for discovery in aid of foreign litigation under 28 U.S.C. §1782. The court found that the district court did not abuse its discretion in allowing discovery from Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP for use in European proceedings.

Peña Garcia v. Department of Labor - Workers' Compensation

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals denied a petition for review in Peña Garcia v. Department of Labor. The court affirmed the denial of reimbursement for medical cannabis-infused edibles, citing the Controlled Substances Act's classification of marijuana as a Schedule I substance.

Tart Cherries Referendum Order for Growers and Processors

The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) is directing a referendum among tart cherry growers and processors in seven states to determine if they favor continuing Marketing Order No. 930. The referendum will be conducted from March 30 to April 20, 2026. USDA will consider termination if less than 50% of voters and volume favor continuance.

Oklahoma Central Filing System Amendments Approved by AMS

The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has approved amendments to Oklahoma's Central Filing System, transferring authority from the Secretary of State to the County Clerk. This change will allow for electronic filing of Effective Financing Statements and public access to recorded documents online.

CISA Adds Wing FTP Server Vulnerability to KEV Catalog

CISA has added CVE-2025-47813, a Wing FTP Server information disclosure vulnerability, to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) Catalog. This addition is based on evidence of active exploitation and poses significant risks to federal agencies.

Colorado AG Joins Lawsuit Challenging HUD Funding Cuts for Fair Housing Enforcement

Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser joined a coalition of state attorneys general in filing a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The lawsuit challenges HUD's actions threatening to withhold funding from state and local fair housing enforcement agencies for adhering to state laws and imposing illegal conditions on HUD funding.

Colorado AG Sues OneMain Financial for Deceptive Lending

Colorado has joined a multistate lawsuit against OneMain Financial, alleging deceptive lending practices and hidden fees that inflated borrowers' costs. The lawsuit seeks restitution for consumers, civil penalties, and injunctive relief to stop the alleged unlawful practices.

DOJ Religious Liberty Commission Sixth Hearing

The Department of Justice (DOJ) has published a notice for the sixth hearing of the Religious Liberty Commission. The notice includes a link to the video recording of the hearing, which took place on March 16, 2026.

Order Grants Hearing Continuance for Melthon James Branch Jr.

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California issued an order granting a stipulation to continue a hearing for Melthon James Branch Jr. in criminal case 3:21-cr-00218-CRB-1. The order was signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa J. Cisneros.

People v. Elhaddad (Ali) - Criminal Conviction Affirmation

The New York Appellate Term affirmed a conviction for third-degree sexual abuse against Ali Elhaddad. The court found the accusatory instrument to be jurisdictionally valid, establishing all elements of the offense and the defendant's commission thereof. The decision was rendered on March 13, 2026.

People v. Scarborough - Criminal Case Affirmation

The New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, affirmed a judgment of conviction for petit larceny against Odell Scarborough. The court found the accusatory instrument was not jurisdictionally defective and that the identification of the defendant was based on personal observation.

People v. Abreu (Ernesto) - DWI Conviction Affirmation

The Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York affirmed a judgment of conviction for driving while intoxicated against Ernesto Abreu. The court found the accusatory instrument to be jurisdictionally valid and upheld the conviction based on the evidence presented.

Colorado Capital Invs. v. Taveras - Legal Opinion

The Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York reversed a lower court's denial of a motion to vacate a default judgment. The court ordered a traverse hearing to determine if the defendant was properly served with the legal documents.

NY AG Sues OneMain for Predatory Lending Practices

New York Attorney General Letitia James, leading a coalition of 12 other state AGs, has sued OneMain Financial for allegedly trapping consumers in debt through predatory lending practices. The lawsuit seeks to stop the company's alleged scheme of adding expensive and useless add-on products to loans without proper disclosure, impacting tens of thousands of New Yorkers.

DEA Temporarily Schedules Bromazolam as Controlled Substance

The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has issued a temporary order scheduling bromazolam as a Schedule I controlled substance. This action is necessary to avoid an imminent hazard to public safety and imposes the full regulatory controls of Schedule I substances on those handling it.

NHTSA Proposes Modernizing FMVSS 103/104 for ADS Vehicles

NHTSA is proposing to amend Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) No. 103 and No. 104 to except vehicles equipped with Automated Driving Systems (ADS) that lack manual driving controls. This action aims to reduce regulatory burdens for ADS vehicles and harmonize standards with current industry practices.

FAA Supplemental Airworthiness Directive

The FAA has issued a Supplemental Airworthiness Directive (AD) based on EASA AD 2024-0088 C1. This AD addresses potential safety issues related to aircraft components, requiring specific actions from manufacturers and operators to ensure continued airworthiness.

FDA withdraws proposed rule on sunlamp products

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has withdrawn a proposed rule concerning the restricted sale, distribution, and use of sunlamp products. This withdrawal means the FDA will not finalize the proposed regulations that were initially published in December 2015.

NRC Issues Construction Permit for Kemmerer Power Station Unit 1

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has issued Construction Permit No. CPAR-1 to US SFR Owner, LLC for the Kemmerer Power Station Unit 1 reactor facility. This permit authorizes the construction of the power reactor in Lincoln County, Wyoming.

FDA Complaint Posted

The FDA has posted a complaint filed by CTP on March 16, 2026. The document is available for review on Regulations.gov, and the comment period has closed.

FDA Variance Approval for J.M.W. Entertainment Group

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a variance approval letter to The J.M.W. Entertainment Group, LLC. This notice pertains to a specific approval granted by the FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH).

FDA Variance Approval Letter to Audio Source, Inc.

The FDA has issued a variance approval letter to Audio Source, Inc. This notice, originating from the CDRH, signifies a specific approval related to a variance request. Further details on the nature of the variance are not provided in the available metadata.

Cboe Futures Exchange Proposed Rule Change on Recordkeeping

The SEC is soliciting comments on a proposed rule change by Cboe Futures Exchange (CFE) to revise its recordkeeping requirements for Orders of Contract for Related Position (ERCP) transactions and Block Trades, specifically concerning security futures. This proposal aims to align with existing CFTC regulations and ensure comprehensive data capture for these types of trades.

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders on Polypropylene Boxes from China

The U.S. Department of Commerce is issuing antidumping and countervailing duty orders on polypropylene corrugated boxes from China, effective March 16, 2026. These orders follow affirmative final determinations by Commerce and the International Trade Commission regarding unfair trade practices.

Commerce Preliminary Finding: Oil Country Tubular Goods from Korea

The U.S. Department of Commerce has preliminarily found that certain oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from South Korea were not sold in the United States below normal value. The review period was September 1, 2023, through August 31, 2024. Interested parties can submit comments.

HUD Proposes Maintenance Wage Rate Information Collection

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is seeking approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for a previously approved information collection regarding maintenance wage rates. This notice allows for a 30-day public comment period.

SEC Notice: Cboe EDGX Exchange Proposed Rule Change on Fees

The SEC has published a notice regarding a proposed rule change by Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. The exchange proposes to amend its Fees Schedule, including changes to Customer and Market Maker Volume Tier programs and the elimination of the Firm Penny Program Cross-Asset Tier. The SEC is soliciting public comments on this proposal.

Nasdaq ISE Proposes Rule Changes on Complex Order Fees

Nasdaq ISE has filed a proposed rule change with the SEC to amend its rules regarding complex order fees and rebates. The filing seeks public comment on modifications to the schedule of Priority Customer complex order rebates for select and non-select symbols.

Cboe BZX Exchange proposes rule change to amend opening auction process

Cboe BZX Exchange has filed a proposed rule change with the SEC to amend its opening auction process. The change aims to delay the auction under certain market conditions to improve price discovery. The SEC has extended the review period for this proposal.

FAA Decision for Phoenix Ag Solutions LTD

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has issued a decision concerning Phoenix Ag Solutions LTD. This notice pertains to a specific case or application within the aviation sector.

US Army Corps of Engineers Seeks Input on Nationwide Permits

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is seeking public input on how to improve the efficiency of its nationwide permit program. This input will inform future rulemaking related to permits issued under the Clean Water Act and Rivers and Harbors Act. The comment period closes on May 15, 2026.

FRA Decision Letter

The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) has posted a decision letter related to docket FRA-2021-0015. This notice indicates the closure of the comment period for this matter.

Air Force Exemption Extension Request

The General Services Administration (GSA) has posted a request from the U.S. Air Force for an extension of an existing exemption. The request was posted on March 16, 2026, and details are available in the attached document.

ICE Officers Stalking Case: Two Women Found Guilty

Two women were found guilty of felony stalking for following an ICE deportation officer home and livestreaming the pursuit on social media. The verdict sends a message that such criminal behavior will not be tolerated, with ICE reporting significant increases in threats and assaults against its personnel.

Florida Man Pleads Guilty to Distributing Animal Crushing Videos

A Florida man, Francisco Javier Ravelo, pleaded guilty to distributing videos depicting the physical and sexual torture of monkeys. The U.S. Attorney's Office stated he faces up to seven years in prison for his crimes following an investigation by Homeland Security Investigations.

Orthodontist Sentenced for Exploiting Children

ICE Homeland Security Investigations announced that orthodontist Thomas Shannon was sentenced to 60 years in prison for the sexual exploitation of at least 18 children. The investigation involved collaboration between federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies.

Oldsmith Henry LLC v Town of Nolensville - Building Permits Dispute

The Tennessee Supreme Court vacated the Court of Appeals' opinion and judgment in Oldsmith Henry LLC v. Town of Nolensville, finding that the lower courts lacked jurisdiction to decide the appeal. The case involved a dispute over building permits and the joinder of additional parties.

Yoel Lodos v. Empire Towing Corp. - Wage Act Violations

The U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado issued an order in the case of Yoel Lodos v. Empire Towing Corp. The plaintiff filed suit alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act and the Colorado Wage Act. The court's order addresses a motion to amend a previous order.

Best v. Cresheim Valley Realty - Landlord-Tenant Dispute

The Pennsylvania Superior Court affirmed a lower court's order denying a motion for post-trial relief and entering judgment in favor of the plaintiffs in a landlord-tenant dispute. The case involved alleged violations of the Philadelphia Lead Paint Disclosure and Certification Law, the Fair Credit Extension Uniformity Act, and the Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law.

Dhaduk v. Patel - Non-Precedential Superior Court Opinion

The Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a non-precedential opinion in Dhaduk v. Patel, docket number 576 MDA 2025. The court affirmed the trial court's order sustaining preliminary objections, finding that a Pennsylvania statute regarding gaming contracts barred recovery of money lent for gambling losses.

Commonwealth v. Walsh - DUI Charge Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court reviewed an appeal by the Commonwealth regarding a trial court's order to dismiss a DUI charge against Edward E. Walsh, Jr. The court reversed in part, affirmed in part, and remanded the case for further proceedings concerning a DUI charge related to driving under the influence of kratom and caffeine.

Com. v. Coleman - Criminal Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a non-precedential decision in the case of Commonwealth v. Coleman. The court affirmed the judgment of sentence following the appellant's conviction for being a person not to possess a firearm, finding no merit in the sole appellate issue concerning a Rule 600 challenge.

Com. v. Cole, B. - Criminal Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a non-precedential opinion in Com. v. Cole, B. The court affirmed convictions for Attempted Burglary and related charges but reversed the conviction for Attempted Criminal Trespass by Break-in. The appeal was filed under docket number 1080 EDA 2025.

Tate v. Graham - Non-Precedential Court Opinion

The Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a non-precedential opinion in Tate v. Graham, docket number 1716 EDA 2025. The court affirmed a lower court's judgment, rejecting an appellant's fraud claim related to an estate.

Com. v. Ceno, F. - Criminal Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a non-precedential decision in the case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Frarlan Ceno. The appellant challenged the discretionary aspects of his sentence following convictions for Terroristic Threats and Harassment. The court affirmed the judgment of sentence.

JAJWK, LLC v. Primeway Federal Credit Union - Contract Dispute

The Texas Court of Appeals reversed a trial court's judgment in a post-judgment turnover proceeding. The court found that the trial court impermissibly voided liens held by non-parties JAJWK, LLC and JAJWK, LP on certain vehicles. The case was reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Texas Health Science Center v. Bustos - Interlocutory Appeal Opinion

The Texas Court of Appeals reversed a lower court's judgment in the case of The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston v. Bustos. The court ruled that a state-employed doctor's hands alone do not constitute 'tangible personal property' for the purpose of waiving sovereign immunity under the Texas Tort Claims Act.

Texas Court of Appeals Denies Mandamus Petition

The Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District, denied a petition for a writ of mandamus filed by Phillip Clay Spedale. The petition challenged temporary spousal support orders issued by a lower court. The court's decision upholds the trial court's temporary orders.

John Pablo Rios v. State of Texas - Criminal Appeal

The Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District, issued a memorandum opinion in the case of John Pablo Rios v. The State of Texas. The court affirmed the trial court's judgment, upholding the conviction and sentence for delivery of a controlled substance and unlawful possession of a firearm by a felon.

Lisa Criswell v. Catherine Polk - Estate Proceedings Opinion

The Texas Court of Appeals issued an opinion in Lisa Criswell v. Catherine Polk, concerning estate proceedings and property disputes. The court dismissed the appeal, affirming a prior ruling on summary judgment and attorney's fees.

In the Interest of A.Y. a Child v. Department of Family and Protective Services

The Texas Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's judgment terminating parental rights for a child named A.Y. The appellate court found sufficient evidence to support the termination based on grounds of endangerment and failure to comply with a family service plan. The decision stems from a case involving the Department of Family and Protective Services.

Washington AG Sues OneMain Financial Over Hidden Fees

The Washington Attorney General, along with 12 other states, has sued OneMain Financial for allegedly charging consumers nationwide hundreds of millions of dollars in hidden fees and interest through deceptive lending practices. The lawsuit seeks restitution for affected consumers and penalties for violating state laws.

Washington AG Sues OneMain Financial for Alleged Lending Scam

The Washington Attorney General, along with 12 other state AGs, has sued OneMain Financial for allegedly charging consumers nationwide hundreds of millions of dollars in hidden fees and interest. The lawsuit claims OneMain engaged in a bait-and-switch lending scheme, adding undisclosed insurance policies and other products to loans.

ITC - Wind Tower Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders Review

The US International Trade Commission has determined that revoking antidumping and countervailing duty orders on utility scale wind towers from Canada, Indonesia, South Korea, and Vietnam would likely lead to the continuation or recurrence of material injury to the US industry. This decision maintains existing trade protections for domestic manufacturers.

Ramana v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. - Civil Case Filing

A civil case, Ramana v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a complaint against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., with a filing fee of $405. The nature of the suit is listed as Consumer Credit under Federal Question basis.

VA Health Professions Education Programs

The VA is highlighting its Health Professions Education (HPE) Week, recognizing the significant role its education programs play in training healthcare professionals. Annually, over 124,000 trainees participate in these programs across 142 VA medical centers.

DOL ERISA Advisory Opinion on Lloyd's of London Bonding Exemption

The Department of Labor issued Advisory Opinion 2024-01A clarifying ERISA bonding requirements for Lloyd's of London. The opinion addresses whether Lloyd's underwriters can rely on NAIC authorization for surplus lines insurance to meet state licensing conditions for serving as surety for ERISA plans.

Child Welfare Case - Parental Rights Termination Affirmed

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed the termination of parental rights for parents B.L.C. and R.A.T. in a child welfare case. The court's opinion, filed on March 16, 2026, addressed challenges to the termination based on allegations of neglect and inadequate care for the children.

Samuel David Berg Conviction Affirmed by Minnesota Court of Appeals

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed the felony domestic assault and fifth-degree assault convictions of Samuel David Berg. The court rejected Berg's arguments that the district court abused its discretion in jury instructions, admitting prior convictions, admitting character evidence, and denying a Schwartz hearing.

Hollis Larson Civil Commitment Case Affirmed

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed a decision by the Commitment Appeal Panel (CAP) to deny Hollis Larson's petition for discharge from civil commitment. Larson, committed in 2008 for sex offenses, argued his diagnoses did not justify continued commitment and that he was denied effective counsel.

Order for Protection Appeal Affirmed by Minnesota Court of Appeals

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's denial of a petition for an order for protection (OFP). The appellate court found no abuse of discretion in the lower court's decision, upholding the denial based on the evidence presented.

State v. Traylor - Nonprecedential Opinion

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions of Jaimee Nichole Traylor for third-degree controlled-substance murder and sale. The court found sufficient evidence to support the convictions, rejecting Traylor's argument that the state failed to prove the drug sold caused the victim's death.

Massaquoi v. Al-Qudeh - Defamation Claim Affirmed

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of a defamation claim brought by tenants against their landlord. The court found no genuine issues of material fact regarding the defamation claim and denied the tenants' motion to amend their complaint.

Wells Fargo Bank vs. True Gravity Ventures, Astra Genstar Partnership affirmed

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision in favor of Wells Fargo Bank in a dispute over property development rights. The court ruled that Astra Genstar Partnership's rights were terminated by a foreclosure sale, upholding Wells Fargo's entitlement to develop the property.

Minnesota Court of Appeals Opinion - Terfehr v. Buffalo-Red River Watershed District

The Minnesota Court of Appeals issued a nonprecedential opinion affirming a district court's decision to deny immunity claims brought by the Buffalo-Red River Watershed District and the Wilkin County Soil & Water Conservation District. The case involves landowners' claims for damages related to a creek restoration project.

Alisha vs. Christopher Steinolfson - Marital Asset Division

The Minnesota Court of Appeals reviewed a district court's division of marital assets in a divorce case. The court affirmed the asset division but reversed the denial of attorney fees, remanding for a determination of the proper award.

Stiever v. Lake County - Negligence and Mandamus Claims

The Minnesota Court of Appeals reviewed a district court's dismissal of negligence and mandamus claims against Lake County. The court affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded the case concerning alleged violations of a conditional use permit.

Bank of New York Mellon v. Auld - Mortgage Foreclosure Dispute

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision in favor of The Bank of New York Mellon in a mortgage foreclosure dispute. The court upheld the foreclosure decree, the reformation of the mortgage, and the dismissal of the appellant's counterclaims.

State v. Ben Vidal Moreno - Criminal Appeal

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions of Ben Vidal Moreno for second-degree murder, attempted second-degree murder, and unauthorized firearm possession. The court found no plain error in jury instructions or prosecutorial misconduct, and affirmed the denial of a postconviction relief petition.

State of Minnesota v. Stephen Kelly Weaver - Controlled Substance Charge Affirmation

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision to dismiss a fifth-degree controlled-substance charge against Stephen Kelly Weaver. The court found that possessing a small plastic baggie with methamphetamine residue does not constitute drug paraphernalia under Minnesota law, and therefore, the charge was properly dismissed for lack of probable cause.

Civil Commitment of Lisa Danielle Labok Reversed by MN Court of Appeals

The Minnesota Court of Appeals reversed a district court's orders for civil commitment and involuntary medication of Lisa Danielle Labok. The reversal was based on the county's failure to provide proper personal service of notice for the hearing, violating statutory requirements.

State of Minnesota v. Joseph Patrick Martin, II - Domestic Assault Conviction Affirmed

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Joseph Patrick Martin, II, for felony domestic assault. The court found no prejudicial abuse of discretion in admitting evidence of prior similar conduct under Minnesota Statutes section 634.20.

Shantz v. City of Waconia - Negligence Appeal

The Minnesota Court of Appeals reversed a district court's denial of summary judgment for the City of Waconia in a negligence case. The court found the city was entitled to vicarious official immunity regarding a slip-and-fall incident on a city sidewalk.

Court affirms dismissal of employment claims against Guardian ad Litem Board

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of Bridgette Williams' employment claims against the Minnesota State Guardian ad Litem Board. The court found that the district court properly dismissed the claims on the pleadings, upholding the board's decision to terminate Williams' employment.

North Sierra Construction, LLC Licensing Order Affirmed

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed a licensing order with penalty against North Sierra Construction, LLC and Louis Dee Sierra. The order was issued by the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry for remodeling a manufactured home without proper permits and licensing, and for providing false information during the investigation.

State v. Dhara Hayi Hassan - Criminal Conviction Appeal

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed in part and reversed in part the conviction of Dhara Hayi Hassan. The court reversed the conviction for possession of a firearm without a serial number based on precedent but affirmed the conviction for second-degree unintentional murder.

Arneson v. St Cloud Auto Sales - Unemployment Benefits Appeal

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed a decision finding Kirstin Arneson ineligible for unemployment benefits due to employment misconduct. The court found substantial evidence supported the unemployment-law judge's determination that Arneson's conduct constituted misconduct.

Donahue v. Donahue - Court Opinion

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed in part and reversed in part a district court judgment concerning a dispute between three brothers over a limited liability company and real property. The court affirmed the dismissal of unjust enrichment claims against the LLC but reversed the order for dissolution of the company.

Helleksen vs. City of Good Thunder - Employment Retaliation

The Minnesota Court of Appeals reversed and remanded a district court's decision granting summary judgment to the City of Good Thunder. The case involves claims of retaliation under the Minnesota Whistleblower Act and reprisal under the Minnesota Human Rights Act following the termination of Ashney Helleksen, the city clerk.

Minnesota Court of Appeals Affirms James Paul Aery Case

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision not to recuse the judge, deny a motion to withdraw a guilty plea, and deny a durational departure in the case of James Paul Aery. The court found no abuse of discretion in these rulings.

United States v. Tyrone Foster, Jr. - Criminal Appeal

The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has issued an opinion in the case of United States v. Tyrone Foster, Jr. The court granted the appointed counsel's motion to withdraw and affirmed the defendant's conviction and sentence.

Tamarac Apts., L.L.C. v. Austin - Appeal Ruling

The Ohio Court of Appeals issued a ruling in Tamarac Apts., L.L.C. v. Austin, concerning an untimely appeal. The court clarified that the thirty-day rule for appeals applies and the motion for delayed appeals is not applicable to civil appeals in this context.

State v. Bray - Plea Validity Appeal

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision in State v. Bray, ruling that the appellant's no contest plea was entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently. The court found no evidence that the appellant's mental health conditions prevented her from understanding the proceedings or the rights she was waiving.

State v. Brown - Criminal Rape Case Appeal

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions and sentence of Michael D. Brown, Sr., for Rape. The appeal addressed issues including substitute counsel, attorney-client relationship, manifest weight of the evidence, ineffective assistance of counsel, and consecutive sentences.

State ex rel. Coleman v. Gillece-Black - Habeas Corpus

The Ohio Court of Appeals dismissed a habeas corpus petition filed by inmate LeRon Coleman against Warden Jennifer Gillece-Black. The dismissal was due to the petitioner's failure to comply with the mandatory filing requirements of R.C. 2969.25(C), specifically regarding the statement of his prisoner account.

State v. King - Ohio Court of Appeals Opinion

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a conviction in State v. King. The appellant challenged the imposition of a consecutive jail term and raised an ineffective assistance of counsel claim. The court found no reversible error.

Zinni v. Scarberry - Contempt Sanctions Upheld

The Ohio Court of Appeals upheld four contempt sanctions against Matthew Scarberry for failing to pay child support and appear in court. The court affirmed a 240-day jail sentence, finding the sanctions were civil in nature and did not violate double jeopardy protections.

U.S. Bank Natl. Assn. v. Daugherty - Foreclosure Appeal

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a foreclosure judgment against homeowners who questioned the bank's right to enforce the note and mortgage. The court found the homeowners lacked standing to challenge assignments and failed to dispute the balance owed.

State v. Vance - Ohio Court of Appeals Drug Possession Case

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a conviction for aggravated possession of drugs. The court found that the initial traffic stop was justified by observed traffic violations, and subsequent observations provided probable cause for the vehicle search and arrest.

State v. Zink - Affirmation of Child Abuse Convictions

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed convictions in State v. Zink, upholding the trial court's decisions regarding detective testimony on delayed disclosures and limitations on cross-examination. The court found no prejudicial error in the prosecutor's closing arguments.

Silmi v. Assad - Ohio Court of Appeals Opinion

The Ohio Court of Appeals issued an opinion in the case of Silmi v. Assad, concerning a divorce and shared parenting plan. The court reversed and remanded the judgment of the lower court.

State v. Fields - Criminal Appeal

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's denial of a motion to suppress evidence in the case of State v. Fields. The court also addressed sentencing discrepancies, affirming the trial court's judgment despite a noted error in the recommended sentence for one charge.

State v. Green-Sarubbi - Criminal Sentencing and Restitution

The Ohio Court of Appeals reversed a restitution order in State v. Green-Sarubbi, finding the lower court erred by holding a new evidentiary hearing on remand. The case involves criminal sentencing and restitution for a motor vehicle accident.

State ex rel. White v. Falkowski - Ohio Court of Appeals Opinion

The Ohio Court of Appeals has issued an opinion in the case of State ex rel. White v. Falkowski. The opinion addresses issues related to extraordinary writs, including motions to dismiss, disqualification of magistrates, mootness, and compliance with local rules.

Connecticut Appellate Court Opinion Release Procedures

The Connecticut Appellate Court has issued a notice clarifying procedures for opinion release, publication, and modification. The notice explains that the 'officially released' date is the operative date for all post-opinion motions and petitions for certification, and that the latest version of an opinion is authoritative in case of discrepancies.

DEC Announces 18th Year of Amphibian Road Crossings Project

The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) announced the 18th year of its Amphibian Migrations and Road Crossings Project. The project engages volunteers to help protect migrating amphibians and reduce road mortality in the Hudson Valley.

Guardant Health v. Natera - Civil Case Filing

This document details the filing of a civil case, Guardant Health, Inc. v. Natera, Inc., in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case was filed on May 27, 2021, and involves a dispute between two companies in the diagnostics and biotechnology sector. Recent filings indicate ongoing procedural matters, including a granted stipulation for a hearing continuance.

Beltran v. VF Outdoor, LLC - Civil Case Filing

Martin Beltran has filed a civil class action complaint against VF Outdoor, LLC in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, docketed as 3:26-cv-02245, was filed on March 16, 2026, with a filing fee of $405.

Gjovik v. Apple Inc. - Racketeer/Corrupt Organization Case

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California has a new case, Gjovik v. Apple Inc., filed on September 7, 2023, alleging violations under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). Recent filings indicate ongoing discovery disputes and motions related to protective orders and confidentiality designations.

Caldwell v. UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company - Case Management Conference Continued

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California has continued a case management conference in Caldwell v. UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company et al. An order signed on March 16, 2026, rescheduled the conference and set a new deadline for a joint case management statement.

Little v. Pacific Seafood Procurement, LLC et al - Order Denying Deposition Protocol

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California issued an order denying a stipulated deposition protocol in the case of Little v. Pacific Seafood Procurement, LLC et al. This ruling pertains to case number 3:23-cv-01098-AGT.

Lucas Ostolaza - Criminal Case Filing

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California has filed recent documents in the criminal case against Lucas Ostolaza (Case Number 4:23-cr-00317-HSG-2). The latest filings include an order and a violation memorandum, with the last filing date noted as March 12, 2026.

MassDEP Awards $200,000 in Water Quality Monitoring Grants

The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) announced $200,000 in grants to five watershed coalitions for water quality monitoring. The funding will support surface water monitoring efforts in various regions across the state, benefiting disadvantaged communities and aligning with federal Clean Water Act requirements.

AG Weiser Opposes HPE/Juniper Merger Settlement

Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser led a coalition of state attorneys general in opposing the $14 billion merger settlement between Hewlett Packard Enterprises and Juniper Networks. The coalition argues the settlement was corrupted by improper influence at the Department of Justice and harms competition, urging the court to reject it under the Tunney Act.

PHMSA Supplement to P-1800 Guidance

The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) has posted a supplement to its P-1800 document. This supplement provides additional information or clarification related to existing guidance for the transportation of hazardous materials.

DFARS Rule: Estonia Added as Qualifying Country

The Department of Defense has issued a final rule amending the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to add Estonia as a qualifying country. This change impacts acquisition regulations related to procurements from this country.

DFARS: Postaward Debriefings

The Defense Acquisition Regulations System has issued a final rule amending the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) regarding postaward debriefings. This rule, effective March 18, 2022, updates requirements for debriefings provided to unsuccessful offerors on contract awards.

Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement Technical Amendments

The Defense Acquisition Regulations System has published technical amendments to the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS). These amendments update various sections of the DFARS to ensure consistency and accuracy in procurement regulations.

DFARS Proposed Rule on Solicitation Provisions and Contract Clauses

The Defense Acquisition Regulations System has issued a proposed rule regarding the review of DFARS solicitation provisions and contract clauses by the DoD Regulatory Reform Task Force. This action is part of a broader regulatory reform initiative within the Department of Defense.

DFARS: Independent Research and Development Expenses

The Defense Acquisition Regulations System has issued a proposed rule concerning Independent Research and Development (IR&D) expenses under the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS). This proposed rule aims to update regulations related to how IR&D costs are treated in defense contracts.

FEC Offers Spring FECFile Webinars for Committees

The Federal Election Commission (FEC) is offering spring webinars to assist committees using its FECFile e-filing software. These training sessions will cover filing information and demonstrate the software to help committees prepare for their April reports.

CFTC Names Jessica Harris as Director of Data and Chief Data Officer

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced the appointment of Jessica Harris as Director of the Division of Data and Chief Data Officer. This appointment aims to enhance the CFTC's data strategy amidst evolving derivatives markets.

ICC Shares Water Conservation Tips for Fix-a-Leak Week

The Illinois Commerce Commission (ICC) is reminding Illinois residents to check for household plumbing leaks during national Fix-a-Leak Week, March 16-22, 2026. The ICC shared tips from the EPA WaterSense program to help detect and fix leaks, potentially reducing water bills by up to 10 percent.

Robert Parker v. State - Criminal Appeal

The Georgia Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's decision to exclude evidence of prior rape allegations made by the alleged victim against other men in the case of Robert Parker v. State. The court found that the exclusion was proper based on the current record.

Cobb County v. Ray Murphy - Zoning Dispute

The Georgia Court of Appeals reversed in part and vacated in part the trial court's order denying Cobb County's motion to dismiss Ray Murphy's challenge to a zoning classification and special land use permit denial. The court remanded the case with direction, finding that the trial court erred in allowing review of a time-barred zoning classification and permitting discovery outside the statutory record review.

Kingwood Resort LLC v. McMurry - Fraud and RICO Claims

The Georgia Court of Appeals affirmed verdicts for fraud and violation of the RICO Act against Kingwood International Resort, LLC and other defendants. The court vacated the punitive damages award and remanded the case for further proceedings.

Court of Appeals of Georgia Opinion - Ellerbee v. Dotson

The Georgia Court of Appeals reversed in part a superior court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Tommy Dotson in a property ownership dispute. The court found genuine issues of material fact regarding an alleged agreement to sell the property, precluding summary judgment. The case involves the estate of Jacquelyn Ellerbee and Matthew Ellerbee.

Peter v. Howerton - Discretionary Application Dismissed

The Georgia Court of Appeals dismissed Peter Howerton's discretionary application for appeal as untimely. The application was filed one day after the extended deadline, and the court lacked jurisdiction to consider it.

Whole Life Center Church v. Dade County Tax Assessors - Tax Exemption Appeal

The Georgia Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's dismissal of Whole Life Center Church's appeal for tax exemption. The dismissal was based on the church's failure to retain legal counsel as instructed by the court, as an unincorporated organization cannot represent itself in superior court without an attorney. The court did not reach the merits of the tax exemption claim.

Stephen Michael Sullivan v. Trustgard Insurance Company - Insurance Coverage Dispute

The Georgia Court of Appeals reversed a lower court's decision in a dispute between Stephen Michael Sullivan and Trustgard Insurance Company regarding uninsured motorist (UM) coverage limits. The court found that the UM policy limit should be $1 million, not $100,000 as determined by the trial court.

HHS OIG Audit of Gateway Health Plan Medicare Advantage Compliance

The HHS Office of Inspector General (OIG) audited Gateway Health Plan, Inc.'s submission of diagnosis codes to CMS for Medicare Advantage risk adjustment. The audit found that most sampled diagnosis codes were not supported by medical records, leading to an estimated $4.3 million in net overpayments for 2018 and 2019.

Owners and CEO Sentenced for $92.8M Black-Market HIV Drug Scheme

The DOJ announced the sentencing of two owners and the CEO of a wholesale pharmaceutical company to a total of 38 years in prison for distributing over $92.8 million in black-market HIV drugs. The scheme involved purchasing diverted drugs and reintroducing them into the legitimate supply chain, endangering patients.

FAA Grants UAS Exemption to Vulgamore Land & Cattle Co Inc

The FAA has granted an exemption to Vulgamore Land & Cattle Co Inc for Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) operations. This exemption allows for commercial agricultural services using UAS weighing 55 pounds or more, under specific conditions outlined in Title 49 U.S.C. § 44807 and 14 C.F.R. Part 11.

FAA Petition Status Update Request

NextGen Drones LLC has submitted a request to the FAA for confirmation of receipt of their Section 44807 petition and guidance on how to track its status. The company also noted an issue with a provided contact phone number.

FAA Adopts Airworthiness Directive for Leonardo Helicopters

The FAA has issued a final airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Leonardo Helicopters Model AB139 and AW139. This AD addresses an unsafe condition related to rear-facing seat headrest locking instructions and requires revisions to the flight manual supplement and placards.

FAA Record of Conversation posted March 16, 2026

FAA Record of Conversation posted March 16, 2026

FAA Decision on Lumenier Holdco LLC Exemption

The FAA has issued a decision regarding an exemption request from Lumenier Holdco LLC, identified by Exemption No. 25414. This decision falls under Docket No. FAA-2025-5213.

FAA Proposes Amending Airspace at Fort Knox, KY

The FAA has proposed amending Class D and Class E airspace and revoking Class E airspace at Fort Knox, KY. This action is a result of decommissioning the Godman NDB and aims to update geographic coordinates and ensure compliance with FAA orders to support instrument flight rule operations.

FAA Decision Document FAA-2025-0953-0003

The FAA has issued a decision document related to Docket No. FAA-2025-0953. This document is an exemption, identified as Exemption No. 25417. The decision was posted on March 16, 2025.

EJ Pontiff Cranberry UAS exemption petition granted

EJ Pontiff Cranberry UAS exemption petition granted

FAA Proposes Airworthiness Directive for Rolls-Royce Trent Engines

The FAA has proposed a new airworthiness directive (AD) for specific Rolls-Royce Trent 1000 series engines. The proposed AD addresses cracking in intermediate pressure compressor variable inlet guide vanes due to high-cycle fatigue. It would require inspections and potential replacement of parts to ensure airworthiness.

FAA Decision on Erickson Aircraft Collection

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has posted a decision regarding the Erickson Aircraft Collection. This notice provides an update on the administrative process concerning this collection.

FAA Decision on Illuminate Drones LLC Exemption

The FAA has issued a decision regarding an exemption request from Illuminate Drones LLC. This notice pertains to exemption number 25415 and is associated with docket number FAA-2025-1551.

FAA Decision on Near Earth Exemption No. 21914A

The FAA has issued a decision regarding Exemption No. 21914A, related to operations near Earth, under Docket FAA-2018-1057. This notice provides the agency's final determination on the matter.

FAA Decision Document

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has posted a decision document related to Docket No. FAA-2025-5211. This document pertains to Exemption No. 25416, providing a specific decision on a request submitted to the agency.

FAA Rulemaking Request for Helser Brothers Farm LLC

The FAA has posted a rulemaking request from Helser Brothers Farm LLC for public comment. This notice pertains to a renewal request and includes confidential business information.

Webseed Inc. et al v. Department of State - Civil Rights Case

A civil rights case, Webseed Inc. et al v. Department of State et al, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a motion to compel a federal censorship report, with a hearing scheduled for June 11, 2026.

Aguirre v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. - Order to Continue Case Management Conference

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California granted a stipulation to continue the case management conference in Aguirre v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. The order, signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., rescheduled the conference from March 31, 2026. A case management statement is now due by April 14, 2026.

Borowsky v. Tree Top, Inc. - Order on Motion to Dismiss

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California issued an order in Borowsky v. Tree Top, Inc. The court granted in part and denied in part the motion to dismiss. Borowsky's request for injunctive relief was dismissed without leave to amend, but her complaint otherwise survives.

Doe v. Taro Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al - Order on Motion to Dismiss

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California granted a motion to dismiss in Doe v. Taro Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. An amended complaint is due by April 17, 2026. This order dismisses claims against the defendants.

Impossible Foods Inc. v. Impossible X LLC - Trademark Dispute

This document details recent filings in the trademark dispute case Impossible Foods Inc. v. Impossible X LLC, filed on April 2, 2021. Recent filings include proposed forms of verdict, minute entries for jury trials, and stipulations for dismissal, indicating the case is progressing towards resolution.

EvenUp, Inc. v. Butler Labs, Inc. - Defend Trade Secrets Act Case

A new civil case, EvenUp, Inc. v. Butler Labs, Inc., was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on September 26, 2025. The case is based on the Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016. Recent filings include transcript orders and a joint discovery letter brief.

Kimber et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, Kimber et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on March 16, 2026. The complaint names Meta Platforms, Inc. and Luxottica of America, Inc. as defendants. The filing fee was $405.

Jasbir S. Thandi - Criminal Case Filing

A criminal case, 4:23-cr-00428-JST-1, involving Jasbir S. Thandi, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on November 16, 2023. Recent filings include a stipulation to vacate and reset a status hearing date.

Frank v. SSA Commissioner - Social Security Case Filing

A new Social Security case, Frank v. SSA Commissioner, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on November 19, 2025. The case involves a dispute over Social Security disability benefits. The last filing date recorded was March 16, 2026.

Manish Lachwani - Criminal Case Filing

This document details a recent filing in the criminal case against Manish Lachwani (Case Number: 3:21-cr-00353-CRB-1) in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The latest filing on March 16, 2026, was an order granting a motion for leave to file.

Cordova v. Huneault - Copyright Case Filing

This document details the filing of a new copyright case, Cordova v. Huneault, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case was filed on June 3, 2025, and involves federal question jurisdiction related to copyright law.

Freeman v. Wells Fargo & Company - Assault, Libel & Slander

This entry details the filing of a new civil case, Freeman v. Wells Fargo & Company, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves claims of assault, libel, and slander, and was filed on February 1, 2023. Recent filings include a joint discovery letter brief and a stipulation to continue a discovery hearing.

NOAA Marine Mammal Protection Act Import Comparability Findings

NOAA's National Marine Fisheries Service has issued a notice regarding Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) comparability findings for imported fish and fish products. This notice reinstates import eligibility for certain fisheries from New Caledonia, Grenada, and Ireland, effective March 16, 2026, removing previous import prohibitions.

NOAA Proposed 2026 Fisheries Specifications for Mackerel, Squid, and Butterfish

NOAA is proposing new specifications for the 2026 chub mackerel and Illex squid fisheries, and reaffirming projected 2026 specifications for longfin squid and butterfish. These proposed specifications aim to prevent overfishing based on recent scientific data. Public comments are requested by April 15, 2026.

Federal Reserve Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

The Federal Reserve Board announced an open meeting scheduled for March 19, 2026, to discuss proposed revisions to capital rules for large banking organizations and adjustments to the surcharge for global systemically important banking organizations. The meeting will be webcast.

USTR Section 301 Investigations on Forced Labor Imports

The USTR has launched Section 301 investigations into 60 major trading partners to determine if they are effectively banning imports of goods produced with forced labor. The investigations aim to assess whether these countries' policies and practices burden U.S. commerce.

FCC Draft Rules for AI Chip Export Controls

The FCC is reportedly drafting new export control regulations for AI chips, which would establish a tiered licensing framework based on computing power. These draft rules signal a significant shift in U.S. strategy for controlling advanced semiconductor technology.

OFAC Authorizes Venezuela Oil and Gas Trade via General Licenses

The U.S. Department of the Treasury's OFAC has issued several general licenses expanding authorizations for trade and investment in Venezuela's oil and gas sector. These licenses, issued starting in late January 2026, aim to provide opportunities for U.S. companies while outlining specific limitations and conditions.

ITC Strawberry Imports Ruling, OFAC License, USTR Investigation, FMC Rules

The FCC reported on an ITC ruling finding injury from Mexican strawberry imports and an OFAC general license authorizing certain transactions related to Russian oil. It also noted a USTR investigation and FMC rules concerning ocean carriers.

USTR Initiates Section 301 Investigations on Forced Labor Import Enforcement

The USTR has initiated Section 301 investigations into 59 countries and the EU for failing to effectively prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor. These investigations could lead to the reimposition of tariffs.

FAA Revokes StarFlite Aviation's Air Carrier Certificate

The FAA has issued an emergency order immediately revoking the Air Carrier Certificate of StarFlite Aviation. The agency alleges the company falsified pilot training records, leading to unqualified pilots operating at least 170 flights.

FAA Proposes $2.8M Fine Against PEMCO for Aircraft Maintenance Violations

The FAA proposes a $2,839,900 civil penalty against PEMCO World Air Services for allegedly violating aircraft maintenance regulations. The agency claims PEMCO knowingly used expired products on five Frontier Airlines aircraft, failing to follow maintenance and quality control manuals.

FMC Meeting on Ocean Shipping Reform Act

The Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) issued a reminder regarding a meeting scheduled for September 21, 2022, to discuss the Ocean Shipping Reform Act. The notice was posted on May 10, 2024.

FMC Commission Meeting Announcement

The Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) announced a public commission meeting scheduled for January 25, 2023. The meeting was streamed live on YouTube, allowing public access to the proceedings.

Terrorist Designation: Sudanese Muslim Brotherhood

The U.S. Department of State has designated the Sudanese Muslim Brotherhood as a foreign terrorist organization under Executive Order 13224. This designation, signed by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, imposes sanctions and asset blocking measures.

U.S. Department of State Regulations and Official Documents

The U.S. Department of State (DOS) has announced the availability of government regulations and official documents through its feed on Regulations.gov. This notice serves as a general announcement for interested parties to access these resources.

HAVANA Act Claims: Expanded Eligibility and Appeal Deadlines

The Department of State has issued a final rule updating the HAVANA Act of 2021. This rule expands eligibility for claims to include injuries occurring on or after September 11, 2001, and establishes a 60-day deadline for submitting appeals of adverse decisions. The changes are effective March 16, 2026.

Agency Information Collection Activities Proposals and Approvals

The U.S. Department of State is publishing a notice regarding its agency information collection activities. This notice informs the public about proposals and approvals related to the collection of information, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act.

Delegation of Authority: Restricting Foreign National Entry

The Department of State has issued a delegation of authority regarding the restriction of foreign national entry into the United States. This notice outlines the internal procedures and responsibilities for implementing such restrictions.

American Alternative Insurance Corp. v. Village of Dolton - Insurance Dispute

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois issued an opinion in the case of American Alternative Insurance Corp. v. Village of Dolton. The case involves an insurance dispute concerning a $33.5 million judgment against the Village of Dolton and other defendants.

Tomas v. Tribble - Dismissal for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois dismissed the case of Tomas v. Tribble without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The court found that the plaintiff's claims regarding child support and participation in the Title IV-D program must be addressed in state court.

Sueros & Bebidas Rehidratantes v. Palimex Distributors - Agreed Final Judgment

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois has entered an agreed final judgment and permanent injunction in the case of Sueros & Bebidas Rehidratantes, S.A. de C.V. and CAB Enterprises, Inc. v. Palimex Distributors Inc. The judgment resolves claims between the plaintiffs and defendant Palimex Distributors Inc.

HHS Refugee Aid for Ukrainians

A GAO report details how the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) allocated $3.78 billion in refugee assistance funds from FY 2022-2024. Approximately 135,000 Ukrainians received aid, including cash, medical care, and housing.

GAO Report: Severe Risks to IRS Operations and Workforce

A GAO report details severe risks to IRS operations and workforce due to significant staff resignations, early retirements, and leadership turnover in 2025. The report highlights threats to customer service, backlog reduction, and technology system readiness, recommending the IRS develop a comprehensive workforce plan.

FedRAMP Updates: Marketplace, RFC Outcomes, RSS Feed

FedRAMP has updated its Marketplace with a new URL and user experience, and introduced an RSS feed for its Changelog. Several public notices were published detailing the outcomes of various RFCs concerning program certifications, external frameworks, and authorization designations.

DOE Building Energy Codes Program Updates

The Department of Energy's Building Energy Codes Program has released a new version of its COMcheck-Web software, which supports commercial and high-rise residential energy code compliance. The program also highlights available resources such as webinars, infographics, and publications.

DOE Building Energy Codes Program Resources and Training

The Department of Energy's Building Energy Codes Program has updated its website to offer comprehensive resources, training, and technical assistance for energy code adoption and implementation. This includes FAQs, publications, compliance tools, and a help desk for specific inquiries.

DOE Assesses State Energy Code Adoption and Savings

The U.S. Department of Energy's Building Energy Codes Program has updated its assessment methodology for state energy code adoption. The new approach uses a quantitative analysis of energy savings impacts, replacing the previous qualitative review.

DOE Analyzes Building Energy Code Impacts

The Department of Energy (DOE) is providing information on its analysis of energy code impacts on residential and commercial buildings. DOE activities include evaluating energy efficiency and cost savings, formulating methodologies, and issuing determinations on code efficiency.

Defense Department Arms Sales Notification

The Defense Department published a notice regarding an arms sales notification. This notification, Transmittal No. 25-1T, concerns the enhancement or upgrade of sensitivity of technology or capability under AECA Section 36(b)(5)(C). The notice was published on March 10, 2026.

Defense Department Arms Sales Notification

The Department of Defense has published a notification regarding proposed arms sales. This notice, published on March 10, 2026, details a proposed sale to Lebanon.

Defense Department Arms Sales Notification

The Department of Defense has published a notice regarding an unclassified arms sale. This notification pertains to proposed issuances of letters of offer for arms sales under the Arms Export Control Act.

Defense Department Arms Sales Notification

The Department of Defense has published an unclassified arms sales notification regarding proposed sales to Denmark. This notice provides details on the types of missiles involved in the potential transaction.

Defense Department Arms Sales Notification

The Department of Defense has published a notice regarding proposed arms sales. This notification, Transmittal No. 25-100, details a proposed letter of offer pursuant to the Arms Export Control Act.

Defense Department Arms Sales Notification

The Defense Department has published a notification regarding proposed arms sales. This notice, published on March 10, 2026, details a proposed letter of offer pursuant to the Arms Export Control Act.

Defense Department Arms Sales Notification

The Defense Department has published an unclassified arms sales notification in the Federal Register. This notice informs the public about potential foreign military sales.

Defense Department Arms Sales Notification

The Department of Defense has published a notice regarding an unclassified arms sales notification. This notice pertains to a proposed issuance of a Letter of Offer for arms sales to Japan, specifically related to Aegis Class Destroyer Support.

Defense Department Arms Sales Notification

The Department of Defense has published a notification regarding proposed arms sales. This notice, published in the Federal Register, details a specific arms sale proposal and provides information for further review.

Housing Price Inflation Adjustment Notice

The Department of Defense has published a notice announcing the housing price inflation adjustment for 2026. The rent threshold has been adjusted to $10,542.60. This adjustment is effective January 1, 2026.

Defense Department Arms Sales Notification

The Department of Defense has published an unclassified notification regarding arms sales. This notice, published in the Federal Register, details specific technology or capability enhancements.

Department of Defense Wage Committee Meeting Notice

The Department of Defense published a notice announcing a meeting of the Defense Wage Committee. The meeting was held on December 9, 2025, and was closed to the public. This notice serves as an informational update regarding committee activities.

Alumni Engagement Innovation Fund 2026

The U.S. Department of State's Embassy Uganda has announced the 2026 Alumni Engagement Innovation Fund (AEIF 2026). Exchange program alumni are invited to submit project proposals by April 20, 2026, with potential awards ranging from $5,000 to $35,000.

Presidential Message on Andrew Jackson's Birthday

The White House issued a presidential message celebrating the birthday of Andrew Jackson, highlighting his legacy and connecting it to the current administration's policies. The message emphasizes themes of championing the common man, fighting corruption, and defending national sovereignty.

Sufiyan v. Bondi - Asylum, Withholding, CAT Review

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals granted in part a petition for review in Sufiyan v. Bondi, remanding the case to the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). The court found the BIA erred by not determining if the petitioner would be eligible for asylum or withholding of removal absent the material support bar, which prevents individuals who provided material support to designated terrorist organizations from receiving such relief. The petition for review regarding Convention Against Torture relief was denied.

United States v. William Jimenez - Sentencing Appeal

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court's judgment in the case of United States v. William Jimenez. The court upheld the 105-month sentence and three years of supervised release, including specific conditions related to electronic device searches, community service, and mental health counseling.

Sacaza v. City of New York - Qualified Immunity Ruling

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a district court's denial of summary judgment for a New York City detective in a false arrest and malicious prosecution case. The court found that the detective was entitled to qualified immunity, reversing the lower court's decision and remanding the case.

GEICO v. Mayzenberg - Insurance No-Fault Benefits Dispute

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a district court judgment in favor of GEICO in a no-fault insurance benefits dispute. The court remanded the case for further proceedings after the New York Court of Appeals clarified that an insurer cannot deny payment based on alleged professional misconduct that does not involve ceding control of a professional services corporation to an unlicensed party.

Bondholders v. Republic of Argentina - Sovereign Bond Default Litigation

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals partially affirmed and partially vacated a district court's dismissal of a lawsuit by bondholders against the Republic of Argentina for defaulted sovereign bond payments. The court found that some of the bondholders' claims are timely and that they now have the authority under Argentine law to sue.

Miller v. Lamanna - Race Discrimination and Retaliation Appeal

The 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a district court's dismissal of a former corrections officer's race discrimination and retaliation claims. The appellate court found the district court erred by converting a summary judgment motion into a Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal motion without considering the full record. The case is remanded for further proceedings.

Peña Garcia v. Department of Labor - Workers' Compensation Review

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals denied a petition for review in Peña Garcia v. Department of Labor. The court affirmed the denial of reimbursement for medical cannabis edibles under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act, citing federal law classifying marijuana as a Schedule I substance.

Kellogg v. Nichols - Judicial Immunity and Firearms Licensing

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals issued an amended opinion in Kellogg v. Nichols, affirming the dismissal of a lawsuit challenging New York's firearms licensing laws. The court held that state judges are absolutely immune from individual-capacity suits and that federal courts lack jurisdiction for official-capacity claims against them regarding license applications.

United States v. Aryeetey - Felon in Possession of Firearm Conviction Affirmed

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction and sentence of Ivanjoel Aryeetey for being a felon in possession of a firearm. The court found no abuse of discretion in admitting DNA evidence and deemed the sentence substantively reasonable.

Safdieh v. Commissioner - Tax Penalties Assessment

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a Tax Court decision, holding that the Commissioner of Internal Revenue may assess penalties for failing to report control of foreign businesses. This ruling allows the IRS to collect $50,000 in penalties against Joseph Safdieh through administrative assessment.

Broadcast Music, Inc. v. North American Concert Promoters Association - Antitrust

The 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a district court's decision regarding music licensing fees set by Broadcast Music, Inc. (BMI) for the North American Concert Promoters Association (NACPA). The court found the imposed rates and expanded definition of gross revenues to be unreasonable and remanded the case for further proceedings.

Connecticut Fair Housing Center v. CoreLogic - Fair Housing Act and FCRA

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on a lawsuit brought by the Connecticut Fair Housing Center against CoreLogic Rental Property Solutions. The court vacated in part, affirmed in part, and reversed in part the lower court's decision regarding alleged violations of the Fair Housing Act and the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

SBK ART LLC v. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP - Discovery for Foreign Litigation

The Second Circuit affirmed a district court order granting SBK ART LLC's petition for discovery in aid of foreign litigation under 28 U.S.C. §1782. The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in allowing discovery from Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP for use in European proceedings.

US v. Cardenas - Conspiracy to Import Cocaine

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the conviction of Jey James Roldan Cardenas for conspiracy to import cocaine. The court found that the district court erred in excluding evidence relevant to Cardenas's defense of lacking criminal intent, remanding the case for further proceedings.

Mar-Can Transportation Co. v. Local 854 Pension Fund - ERISA Withdrawal Liability

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court decision, reducing Mar-Can Transportation Company's withdrawal liability from the Local 854 Pension Fund by $1.8 million. The ruling interprets an ambiguous ERISA provision regarding the transfer of unfunded vested benefits when employees switch unions.

Care One LLC v. NLRB - Unfair Labor Practice Proceedings

The 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's denial of a preliminary injunction for Care One LLC and affiliated health care facilities. The facilities sought to halt NLRB proceedings, arguing the ALJ's appointment was invalid due to a lack of quorum and unconstitutional removal protections. The court found the plaintiffs could not demonstrate irreparable harm.

Appeals Court Decision: Jin v. City of New York

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a lower court's denial of qualified immunity to NYPD officers in a false arrest case. The court found that officers had arguable probable cause to arrest Guo Hua Jin, overturning the district court's decision and dismissing the false arrest claim.

Jeffrey L. v. Frank Bisignano - Social Security Benefits Appeal

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington issued an opinion reversing an Administrative Law Judge's denial of Social Security benefits for Plaintiff Jeffrey L. The court found the ALJ erred in evaluating the plaintiff's limitations and remanded the case for an award of benefits.

Colorado Renewable Energy Development on Disturbed Lands

Colorado HB26-1268 proposes measures to advance renewable energy projects on previously disturbed lands by authorizing local governments to designate renewable energy reinvestment areas. The bill aims to streamline permitting and facilitate infrastructure financing for eligible projects.

Regulation of Hemodialysis Treatment Clinics and Technicians

Colorado Bill HB26-1280 proposes to continue the regulation of hemodialysis treatment clinics and technicians for 11 years, until September 1, 2037. This action implements a recommendation from the 2025 sunset report by the department of regulatory agencies.

Colorado Recognizes Latino/a Advocacy Day

The Colorado Legislature has introduced House Joint Resolution 26-1023 to recognize Latino/a Advocacy Day. This resolution designates a specific day for advocacy and community engagement, aiming to highlight the contributions and concerns of the Latino/a community within the state.

ICE Detainee Death Notification - Afghan National

ICE announced the death of an Afghan national, Mohammad Nazeer Paktiawal, who was in ICE custody for less than one day. Paktiawal had prior arrests for fraud and theft. His death is under active investigation.

Man Sentenced for Fentanyl Pill Press Operation

A Washington man was sentenced to 20 years in prison for operating a clandestine pill press that produced millions of fentanyl pills. The investigation by HSI and other agencies uncovered significant quantities of drugs and firearms. This case highlights the severe penalties for illicit drug manufacturing and distribution.

Texas Court of Appeals Affirms Tax Exemption for Chemical Containers

The Texas Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's decision that ChampionX, LLC is exempt from sales taxes on its purchases of chemical containers and associated services. The court found that the containers used for manufacturing and selling chemicals for the energy and water industries qualified for a statutory exemption.

Nalakurthi v. Kancherla - Divorce and Protective Order Consolidation

The Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District, granted a motion to consolidate two appeals concerning a divorce decree and a protective order. Appeal number 15-25-00191-CV was dismissed, with proceedings to continue under appeal number 15-26-00020-CV.

Villasenor Hernandez et al v. City of Richmond et al - Civil Rights Case

A new civil rights case, Villasenor Hernandez et al v. City of Richmond et al, was filed on March 15, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The complaint alleges violations of civil rights against the City of Richmond and two individuals. The filing fee was $405.

FDA Variance Approval for North Bay Productions

The FDA has issued a variance approval letter to North Bay Productions. This document, originating from the CDRH, signifies an approval related to a specific variance request.

FDA Variance Application from William Moore - Public Comment

The FDA is accepting public comments on a variance application submitted by William Moore. The comment period is open until March 13. This action pertains to a specific application for a variance.

FDA Mammography Standards Quality Act Requirements Comment Request

The FDA has submitted a proposed collection of information related to Mammography Quality Standards Act requirements to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review. The agency is requesting public comments on this information collection, with a deadline of April 13, 2026.

FDA Variance Application from Low Frequency Productions

The FDA is accepting comments on a variance application submitted by Low Frequency Productions. This application pertains to medical device regulations. The comment period for this application closed on March 13.

Perez v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al - Immigration

A new civil case, Perez v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al, was filed on March 15, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves 'Other Immigration Actions' and names the U.S. Department of Homeland Security as a defendant.