Tamarac Apts., L.L.C. v. Austin - Appeal Ruling
Summary
The Ohio Court of Appeals issued a ruling in Tamarac Apts., L.L.C. v. Austin, concerning an untimely appeal. The court clarified that the thirty-day rule for appeals applies and the motion for delayed appeals is not applicable to civil appeals in this context.
What changed
The Ohio Court of Appeals has issued a ruling in the case of Tamarac Apts., L.L.C. v. Austin, with docket number 2026-L-0003. The court's syllabus addresses Appellate Rule 4(A) and the application of the thirty-day rule for filing appeals. It specifically states that an untimely appeal was filed and that a motion for delayed appeals is inapplicable to civil appeals.
This ruling clarifies procedural rules for legal professionals and courts in Ohio regarding the timeliness of civil appeals. Parties involved in civil litigation should ensure strict adherence to the thirty-day appeal deadline, as the mechanism for seeking delayed appeals is not available in such cases. Failure to comply with these deadlines may result in the dismissal of the appeal.
Source document (simplified)
Jump To
Top Caption Syllabus Combined Opinion
Support FLP
CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.
Please become a member today.
March 16, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note
Tamarac Apts., L.L.C. v. Austin
Ohio Court of Appeals
- Citations: 2026 Ohio 879
- Docket Number: 2026-L-0003
Judges: S. Lynch
Syllabus
APPELLATE REVIEW - App.R. 4(A); thirty-day rule; untimely appeal; motion for delayed appeals inapplicable to civil appeals.
Combined Opinion
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get Courts & Legal alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when Ohio Court of Appeals publishes new changes.