Trafford Council Seeks Suppliers for Residential Placements

Trafford Council has published an open opportunity for suppliers to provide residential placements for children, with a contract value of £1.11 billion. The procurement uses a restricted procedure and closes on April 27, 2026, with a contract start date of June 1, 2026.

YPO Fleet Management Dynamic Purchasing System

YPO has published a notice for a £500 million Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for Fleet Management services, with a closing date of February 24, 2029. This DPS is open to all public sector organizations and aims to onboard suppliers for fleet management solutions.

ACLU v. Clark County School District - Public Records Act

The Nevada Supreme Court ruled that internal investigation files concerning peace officer misconduct are confidential and exempt from disclosure under the Nevada Public Records Act. This decision clarifies the scope of public records requests related to law enforcement internal affairs.

Hartzel v. State of Texas - Injury to Elderly Person Conviction Affirmed

The Texas Court of Appeals affirmed Alan Roy Hartzel's conviction for causing injury to an elderly person by omission. The court upheld the life sentence imposed by the trial court, finding sufficient evidence to support the conviction based on the appellant's failure to provide adequate nutrition and medical care to his mother.

Andy Jerome Williams v. the State of Texas - Drug Possession Appeal

The Texas Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Andy Jerome Williams for possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. Williams was sentenced to 25 years in prison and a $4,000 fine. The court denied his appeal regarding alternative perpetrator evidence.

Meek v. State of Texas - Assault Case Affirmed

The Texas Court of Appeals affirmed a conviction for assault causing bodily injury against a family member. The appellant argued that the State's use of the term 'victim' violated his due process rights. The court found the issue was not preserved for review.

Chad Pinkerton v. Mark Keough - TCPA Motion Denied

The Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District, affirmed a lower court's order denying a motion to dismiss filed under the Texas Citizen's Participation Act (TCPA). The motion was filed by Chad Pinkerton and the Pinkerton Law Firm against Mark Keough, the County Judge of Montgomery County, in a case involving claims of defamation, wiretap violations, and other torts.

Cotton v. Montgomery County Civil Service Commission - Affirmation of Demotion and Suspension Appeal

The Texas Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision, upholding the demotion and disciplinary actions against Donna Cotton, a county dispatcher supervisor. The court also dismissed her appeal regarding a two-day suspension, finding the county's regulations regarding appeals of suspensions longer than three days to be lawful.

Tomika Oliver v. State of Texas - Evading Arrest Conviction Affirmed

The Texas Court of Appeals affirmed a 99-year sentence for Tomika Shanee Oliver, convicted of evading arrest with a vehicle. The court found that Oliver forfeited her right to appeal the State's discussion of parole law during closing arguments because she did not object at trial.

State of Texas v. Joshua Logan - Appeal Dismissed

The Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District, has dismissed the State of Texas's appeal in the case of State of Texas v. Joshua Logan. The dismissal follows a motion filed by the State's County and District Attorney, as per Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a). The appeal concerned an order modifying a previous judgment.

Hendrickson v. Texas - Indecency Conviction Affirmed

The Texas Court of Appeals affirmed a conviction for indecency with a child and a 30-year sentence for Robert Brian Hendrickson. The court addressed Hendrickson's argument that the trial court erred in admitting expert testimony.

ROM Trucking, LLC v. State of Texas - Mandamus Dismissed Moot

The Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District, has dismissed the Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed by ROM Trucking, LLC against the State of Texas. The dismissal is due to mootness, as both parties confirmed there was no longer a dispute to consider.

Poff v. Poff - Appeal Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

The Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District, dismissed the appeal in Julia Ann Poff v. William Harvey Poff for want of prosecution. The appellant failed to file a required brief by the court's deadline, leading to the dismissal of the case.

Ex Parte Moore v. State of Texas - Habeas Corpus Petition Dismissed

The Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District, dismissed Thomas Moore's petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The court cited a lack of original jurisdiction for criminal habeas corpus proceedings as the basis for dismissal, despite the petition being filed on March 23, 2026.

In Re Heather Jean Foust v. the State of Texas - Mandamus Petition Denied

The Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District, denied a Petition for Writ of Mandamus and dismissed an Emergency Motion for Temporary Relief in the case of In Re Heather Jean Foust v. the State of Texas. The court issued a memorandum opinion and denied the writ on March 26, 2026.

In the Interest of I.S., a Child v. the State of Texas - Termination of Parental Rights

The Texas Court of Appeals reversed and remanded a trial court's order terminating parental rights for a child identified as I.S. The appellate court found that the trial court erred by signing the termination order before completing a de novo hearing, violating the mother's due process rights and Family Code section 201.015.

Southern Montgomery County Municipal Utility District v. Grace Community Church - Court Opinion

The Texas Court of Appeals issued an opinion in the case of Southern Montgomery County Municipal Utility District v. Grace Community Church. This ruling addresses a dispute between a municipal utility district and a church, likely concerning property rights or utility services. The court's decision provides a final determination on the legal issues presented in this specific case.

Motiva Enterprises v. Whitmire - Permissive Appeal

The Texas Court of Appeals reversed and rendered a lower court's decision in Motiva Enterprises v. Whitmire. The court found that Motiva was immune from a personal injury lawsuit under the exclusive-remedy provision of the Texas Workers' Compensation Act, as Motiva qualified as a general contractor providing workers' compensation coverage.

In Re Lester Davis v. the State of Texas - Mandamus

The Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District, denied Relator Lester Davis's Original Application for Writ of Mandamus. The court issued a memorandum opinion and denied the motion or writ without further publication.

In re S.B. - Juvenile Dependency Case

The California Court of Appeal conditionally reversed orders terminating parental rights for eight children, remanding the case to ensure compliance with the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA). The court found a failure to properly inquire into the minors' ancestry, necessitating further proceedings.

In re E.J. - Affirmation of Denial of Motion to Terminate Firearm Prohibition

The California Court of Appeal affirmed the juvenile court's denial of a motion to terminate a firearm prohibition for E.J., who was declared a ward of the court in 2018 for assault with a deadly weapon. The court found the firearm prohibition statute (Pen. Code, § 29820) facially constitutional.

Senseman v. Mimi Real Properties - Judgment Modified, Fees Struck

The California Court of Appeal modified a judgment in Senseman v. Mimi Real Properties, striking certain fee awards. The court affirmed the judgment with modifications, addressing issues related to noise abatement from short-term rentals and damages.

People v. Tillman - Affirmation of Judgment

The California Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment against Diontanae Jerome Tillman, who was convicted of murder and robbery. The court found that Tillman's contentions regarding the admission of evidence about his teardrop tattoo and ineffective assistance of counsel were without merit. The sentence of 50 years to life in state prison stands.

Naeini v. Leuchter - Appeal on $6,000 fees affirmed

The California Court of Appeal affirmed an order awarding $6,000 in attorneys' fees to respondent Michael Leuchter as the prevailing party in a civil harassment restraining order case. Petitioner Ava Naeini's appeal, which alleged judicial bias and hostility, was found to lack merit.

People v. Huffman - Motion to Suppress Firearm Evidence

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court's denial of a motion to suppress evidence, upholding the conviction of Braedin Huffman for concealing an unregistered and loaded firearm found during a traffic stop. The court found the stop lawful based on observed vehicle code violations and the smell of marijuana.

Marriage of Gill: Support Order and Fees Affirmed

The California Court of Appeal reviewed a family law case concerning support orders and attorney fees. The court addressed Asham Gill's contentions regarding the calculation of temporary and retroactive family support, the treatment of parental gift income, and the award of interim attorney fees. The opinion modifies the support order and addresses fee awards.

People v. Avena - Immigration Consequences Ruling

The California Court of Appeal reversed a lower court's denial of Jose Manuel Avena's motion to vacate his conviction based on a failure to understand immigration consequences. The court found a reasonable possibility that Avena would have sought an immigration-safe plea had he been aware of a change in law.

People v. Henriquez - Convictions Upheld, Sentence Remanded

The California Court of Appeal affirmed most convictions for Yoni Antonio Henriquez related to sexual abuse of a minor but found insufficient evidence for one conviction and remanded for resentencing. The court upheld convictions for lewd acts and forcible rape, but reversed a conviction for sexual penetration by a foreign object.

People v. Steele - Affirmation of Denial of Conviction Vacation for Immigration Consequences

The California Court of Appeal affirmed the denial of a petition to vacate convictions filed by Nicolas Steele, who pleaded guilty in 1997. The court found Steele did not establish prejudice from his counsel's alleged failure to properly advise him on immigration consequences.

Meiner v. Superior Court - Motion to Suppress Granted

The California Court of Appeal modified an opinion concerning a motion to suppress evidence. The modification clarified that the appeal challenges an order denying a motion to quash or traverse a warrant obtained from a probation search, specifically concerning the search of an Apple Pay account. The court granted the petition for writ of mandate/prohibition.

Donkin v. Federizo - Trustee Fees

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a probate court order approving the third account current and trustee fees for an interim trustee in the Donkin v. Federizo case. The decision addresses long-standing litigation regarding a trust.

ZK Oakland Properties v. Golden Stream Properties - Unlawful Detainer and Breach of Lease

The California Court of Appeal issued a non-precedential memorandum opinion in ZK Oakland Properties LLC v. Golden Stream Properties LLC. The case involves an unlawful detainer judgment and a breach of lease claim, with the court affirming the trial court's judgment for ZK Oakland Properties.

Court upholds termination of father's reunification services

The California Court of Appeal upheld a juvenile court's order terminating reunification services for father M.H. The court found no abuse of discretion, affirming the termination based on the father's criminal history, prior termination of parental rights, and incarceration. The opinion is designated as non-precedential.

DWR may enter property for precondemnation testing without condemnation action

The California Court of Appeal affirmed that the Department of Water Resources (DWR) may enter private property for precondemnation testing under Code of Civil Procedure section 1245.010, et seq. This ruling clarifies the scope of precondemnation entry statutes for public entities undertaking infrastructure projects.

Estate of Asberry - Probate Court Erred, Remanded

The California Court of Appeal reversed and remanded an order denying a petition to discharge an executor. The court found that the estate had no property subject to administration when the petition was filed and therefore the executor was entitled to discharge. The court did not consider an argument regarding the California Public Records Act due to lack of standing.

Independent Office of Law Enforcement Review and Outreach v. Sonoma County Sheriff's Office

The California Court of Appeal ruled that the Independent Office of Law Enforcement Review and Outreach (IOLERO) has the authority to issue subpoenas in whistleblower complaint investigations. The court reversed a lower court's decision that had found against IOLERO, affirming the oversight entity's subpoena power under state law.

Ross v. U-Haul Co. - Appeal Dismissed, Contract Claim Dismissed, Civil Rights Claim Viable

The California Court of Appeal dismissed Lindsay Ross's appeal against U-Haul Company of California. The court upheld the dismissal of the breach of contract claim and noted that while the civil rights claim was initially allowed with leave to amend, the subsequent proposed amended complaint did not conform to court orders, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

People v. Williams - Affirmation of Conviction

The California Court of Appeal affirmed the conviction of Dante Lee Williams for assault and resisting an officer. The court found no error in the jury instructions regarding great bodily injury, upholding the trial court's judgment.

DTSC Secures $100,800 Settlement with Dry Cleaner for Cleanup Violations

The California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) has secured a $100,800 settlement with the former operators of Omo’s Fabricare Dry Cleaners in Richmond. The penalties are for non-compliance with a 2023 DTSC cleanup order related to tetrachloroethylene (PCE) contamination at the site.

CT AG Issues Immigration Policy and Guidance

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong has issued a statement of policy and guidance regarding immigration matters. The document clarifies the state's legal position and aims to build trust between immigrant communities and state officials, including law enforcement.

CT AG Joins 16 AGs Urging Congress to Close Data Surveillance Loophole

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong, joined by 16 other state attorneys general, has urged Congress to close a loophole that allows federal agencies to purchase commercial data for mass surveillance without warrants. The letter calls for stricter regulations on data brokers and federal data acquisition practices.

Sunshine Act Meeting Cancellation

The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission has cancelled its Sunshine Act meeting previously scheduled for March 26, 2026. The cancellation notice was published on March 24, 2026, and supersedes a previous announcement from March 10, 2026.

Qubit Owl Trademark Application for Cybersecurity SaaS

The USPTO has received an intent-to-use trademark application for 'Qubit Owl' for cybersecurity SaaS services. The application covers software for threat assessment, analysis, and program development, as well as related technology consultation and data protection services.

Broad Street Realty, Inc. (BRST) 8-K Filing

Broad Street Realty, Inc. (BRST) has filed an 8-K report with the SEC on May 15, 2026. The filing pertains to the company's bankruptcy proceedings, indicating a significant event for the publicly traded entity.

ECO ORIGIN Trademark Publication

The USPTO has published the ECO ORIGIN trademark application for opposition. The application covers the supply and distribution of various medical gases. The publication date is March 26, 2026, with a filing date of May 5, 2025.

Ailco Data Breach Notice to Consumers

The Vermont Attorney General's Office has published a data breach notice concerning Ailco. The notice, dated March 26, 2026, informs consumers about a data breach incident involving Ailco.

Schubert Organization Inc. Data Breach Notice to Consumers

The Vermont Attorney General's Office has published a data breach notice from The Schubert Organization Inc. to consumers. The notice, dated March 20, 2026, details a security incident affecting consumer data.

STRATeBEN Data Breach Notice to Consumers

The Vermont Attorney General's Office has published a data breach notice from STRATeBEN to consumers. The notice, dated March 26, 2026, details a security incident affecting consumer data. The document is a notification of the breach and its potential impact.

UFCW Local 342 Data Breach Notice to Consumers

The Vermont Attorney General's Office has published a data breach notice for UFCW Local 342, informing consumers about a security incident. The notice provides a link to a PDF document detailing the breach and its implications for affected individuals.

Coalesce LLC Data Breach Notice to Consumers

The Vermont Attorney General's Office has published a data breach notice from Coalesce LLC, doing business as Benefitelect. The notice informs consumers about a data breach that occurred and provides a link to the official notification document.