7th Street Partners v. City of Santa Monica - Court Opinion

The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Four, filed an opinion in the case of 7th Street Partners LLC v. City of Santa Monica. The case concerns a dispute over tenant relocation orders and a motion for sanctions filed by the City under section 128.7 of the California Code of Civil Procedure.

People v. Scott - Criminal Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Five, affirmed the judgment against Miesha Licole Scott. Scott pleaded no contest to attempted murder and admitted to a prior strike conviction, receiving a 14-year sentence. The court found no arguable issues upon independent review.

In re Menchaca - Habeas Corpus Petition Denied

The California Court of Appeal denied a habeas corpus petition filed by Stephen Menchaca, who was challenging the Board of Parole Hearings' decision to deny him parole. The court applied the 'some evidence' standard and found the Board did not err in concluding Menchaca posed an unreasonable risk to public safety.

Seeley v. Urwell Diversified Holdings - CA Court of Appeal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division One, issued an order modifying a prior opinion in the case of Seeley v. Urwell Diversified Holdings. The modifications clarify the number and nature of claims pending between the parties at the commencement of the bench trial.

Quality Loan Service Corp. v. Szanto - Foreclosure Proceeds Dispute

The California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division Three, affirmed a lower court's judgment awarding surplus proceeds from a nonjudicial foreclosure sale to Bank of America, N.A. The appellant, Peter Szanto, argued the sale was void due to bankruptcy stays and other procedural issues, but the appellate court found his claims were forfeited.

People v. Maravilla - Criminal Appeal on Restitution Order

The California Court of Appeal, Sixth Appellate District, affirmed a restitution order against Joel Adalberto Maravilla. Maravilla appealed the order for reimbursement to the California Victim Compensation Board and the victim's mother for mental health treatment and security system installation, arguing trial court error. The court found no merit in his arguments.

Supporters Alliance v. City of Inglewood - Attorney Fee Award

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court's award of $165,072.50 in attorney fees to Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility (SAFER) in its challenge against the City of Inglewood's environmental review process for a housing development. The court considered factors related to the Housing Accountability Act and SAFER's alleged financial incentives to litigate.

People v. Perez - Fourth Amendment Vehicle Impoundment

The California Court of Appeal ruled that a police officer's decision to impound a driver's vehicle solely to prevent further illegal driving does not satisfy the community caretaking function under the Fourth Amendment. The court reversed a judgment, finding the impoundment and subsequent searches unlawful.

People v. Garamallo - California Court of Appeal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal for the Fifth Appellate District has issued an opinion in the case of People v. Garamallo. The case involves a defendant resentenced under Penal Code section 1172.75, with the trial court striking prior prison term enhancements but declining to resentence under the Three Strikes Reform Act. The appellate court agreed to remand the case for the trial court to exercise its discretion regarding the Three Strikes offenses.

Vasquez v. Janelle Investment - Appeal of Order Denying Motion to Vacate Default Judgment

The California Court of Appeal affirmed an order denying a motion to vacate a default judgment in a habitability action. The defendants appealed, arguing their former attorney abandoned them, but the court found a pattern of delay and obstruction. This non-precedential opinion is not to be published in the official reports.

Sheerer v. Panas - Child Support Modification Appeal

The California Court of Appeal reversed a trial court order modifying child support payments, finding the court failed to account for bonus income. The court also warned in propria persona litigants about the dangers of using generative AI for legal briefs, citing a case where fabricated citations were submitted.

In re Zachary R. - Juvenile Court Law Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Eight, issued a non-precedential opinion in the case of In re Zachary R. The court affirmed the juvenile court's detention and dispositional orders, finding substantial evidence supported the jurisdictional order and that the father's challenge to the detention order was moot.

People v. Ford - Criminal Threat Sentencing Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, issued an opinion in People v. Ford concerning a defendant convicted of making criminal threats. The appeal focused on whether the trial court properly considered the defendant's mental health issues in sentencing, distinguishing between psychological trauma and mental illness.

People v. Loza - Criminal Plea Withdrawal Appeal

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court's denial of a motion to withdraw a no-contest plea in the case of People v. Loza. The defendant appealed, arguing the court abused its discretion in considering the totality of circumstances and applying an unwarranted prejudice standard when evaluating her plea withdrawal request.

People v. Phillips - DUI Causing Injury Appeal

The California Court of Appeal reversed and remanded an order revoking probation for a defendant convicted of DUI causing injury. The court found that a legislative amendment to the probation statute, enacted after the defendant's conviction but before the probation violation, should have been applied.

Seaker & Sons v. Cushman & Wakefield - Breach of Contract

The California Court of Appeal reversed a lower court's decision in Seaker & Sons v. Cushman & Wakefield, finding that the breach of contract claim was properly pled. The case involves a landlord suing its property manager for allowing unpermitted construction.

People v. Kinsey - Criminal Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division Three, issued a non-precedential opinion in the case of People v. Kinsey. The appeal concerned a postjudgment order related to a resentencing petition filed under Penal Code section 1172.6. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's denial of the petition.

People v. Lopez - California Court of Appeal Opinion Modification

The California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division One, issued an order modifying a previously filed opinion in the case of People v. Lopez. The modification involves adding a footnote regarding estoppel arguments in plea agreements and renumbering subsequent footnotes. This is a procedural update to a non-precedential opinion.

In re C.S. - California Court of Appeal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, has filed a non-precedential opinion in the case of In re C.S. The court reviewed the record for arguable issues on appeal and found none, affirming the judgment. The case involves a juvenile charged in connection with a homicide.

W.R. v. G.B. - Civil Harassment Restraining Order Appeal

The California Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal concerning a civil harassment restraining order. The court found the appeal moot because the restraining order had expired by its terms before the appellate decision was rendered. The appellant had sought to terminate the order, alleging fraudulent service.

Ofcom Fines 4chan £450,000 for Child Pornography Protection Failures

Ofcom has fined the social media platform 4chan a total of £520,000 for failing to protect children from online pornography. The fines include £450,000 for lacking effective age checks, £50,000 for failing to assess risks of illegal content, and £20,000 for inadequate terms of service regarding illegal content protection.

Ofcom Opens Q/V Band Spectrum for Satellite Gateways

Ofcom has decided to make up to 10 GHz of spectrum in the Q/V band available for satellite gateway earth stations in low-density areas of the UK. The regulator is now consulting on proposals to extend this access to high-density urban areas and has announced changes to streamline the Non-Geostationary Orbit (NGSO) licensing process.

Ofcom Spectrum Policy Updates and Consultation on Satellite Services

Ofcom has published updates to its spectrum policy for space-based services, including changes to licensing and fees. The regulator also announced upcoming consultations on expanding spectrum access for satellite broadband on ships and planes, and future approaches to the 2 GHz spectrum band.

RBI Approves Transition Arrangement for HDFC Bank Part-Time Chairman

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has approved a transition arrangement for the Part-Time Chairman position at HDFC Bank. The RBI stated that HDFC Bank is a Domestic Systemically Important Bank (D-SIB) with sound financials and no material concerns regarding its conduct or governance.

Guidance on Integration Certificate for Defence Export Controls

The UK Export Control Joint Unit (ECJU) has published guidance on completing the Integration Certificate required under Article 3 of the Agreement on Defence Export Controls. This guidance aims to assist exporters in understanding the necessary information and ensuring accurate submission of technical details.

Guidance on Submitting Export Licence Applications for Defence Controls

The UK Export Control Joint Unit (ECJU) has published new guidance for exporters on submitting licence applications under the Agreement on Defence Export Controls. This guidance aims to help exporters understand requirements, provide accurate information, and ensure timely processing of their applications.

EBA Amends Technical Standards on Own Funds Application Timing

The European Banking Authority (EBA) has published final draft amending technical standards to shorten the application processing time for reducing own funds and eligible liabilities instruments from four to three months. These amendments aim to reduce regulatory burden for institutions and remove provisions for liquidation entities following recent legislative changes.

Atkinson v. Carrier Corporation - Labor Dispute

Carrier Corporation has filed a Notice of Removal in the case Atkinson v. Carrier Corporation, initiating a civil case based on diversity jurisdiction. The case was originally filed in Alameda County Superior Court and has been transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

Keenah Taylor v. State of Indiana - Criminal Conviction Appeal

The Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded the case of Keenah Taylor v. State of Indiana. The court upheld the admission of victim statements and the sufficiency of evidence for rape conviction but reversed the denial of pretrial good time credit, ordering the trial court to award it.

Washington Air Quality Report on Overburdened Communities

A new report from WA Ecology and the Department of Health indicates improved air quality in Washington's most overburdened communities. While disparities persist, the findings are influenced by reduced wildfire activity and lighter traffic, and will inform future rulemaking under the Climate Commitment Act.

California Connect Program Updates for Disabled Californians

The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) has adopted updates to the California Connect program, also known as the Deaf and Disabled Telecommunications Program (DDTP). These updates aim to strengthen and modernize the program, which provides free communication tools and services to eligible Californians with disabilities.

AG Bonta Sues to Block Nexstar/Tegna Broadcasting Merger

California Attorney General Rob Bonta, joined by eight other state attorneys general, has filed a lawsuit to block the $6.2 billion acquisition of Tegna Inc. by Nexstar Media Group, Inc. The lawsuit alleges the merger would substantially lessen competition, harm consumers through increased prices, and negatively impact local news delivery.

CSA Adopts Semi-Annual Financial Reporting Pilot for Venture Issuers

The Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) has adopted a pilot project allowing eligible venture issuers to voluntarily file semi-annual financial reports instead of quarterly reports. This initiative, formalized by Coordinated Blanket Order 51-933, aims to reduce regulatory burden for smaller issuers listed on the TSX Venture Exchange or CNSX Markets while maintaining investor protection.

Illinois Supreme Court: Amazon Must Pay for COVID-19 Screening Time

The Illinois Supreme Court ruled that Amazon must compensate its hourly employees for time spent undergoing mandatory COVID-19 screenings before their shifts. The court answered a certified question from the Seventh Circuit, holding that Illinois's Minimum Wage Law does not incorporate the federal Portal-to-Portal Act's exclusion for preliminary and postliminary activities.

People v. Johnson - First Degree Murder Sufficiency of Evidence

The Illinois Supreme Court reviewed a first-degree murder conviction where the appellate court reversed the trial court's judgment based on the sufficiency of identification evidence and reliance on social science research not presented at trial. The Supreme Court reversed the appellate court's decision, finding that the State proved the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

Illinois Supreme Court Opinion in People v. McCoy

The Illinois Supreme Court affirmed the denial of Michael McCoy's successive postconviction petition. The court found that the circuit court did not err in denying the petition, as the evidence presented did not conclusively establish actual innocence or warrant a new trial. The opinion addresses the standard for considering new evidence in postconviction proceedings.

Illinois Supreme Court Opinion on Solicitation of Murder for Hire

The Illinois Supreme Court issued an opinion clarifying the elements of solicitation of murder for hire. The court held that the offense does not require proof that the person solicited shared the defendant's genuine intent to commit murder. This ruling affirms previous appellate court decisions and clarifies the legal standard for such charges in Illinois.

AG Paxton Stops Rogue Utility District Supporting Islamic Center Development

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton secured a temporary restraining order (TRO) against Double R Municipal Utility District (MUD) to halt its actions, including appointing new directors and considering agenda items. The lawsuit alleges the MUD was unlawfully taken over to support the East Plano Islamic Center development, potentially allowing developers to avoid state oversight and impose taxes without proper process.

IRS Corrects Final Rule on Estate Basis Reporting

The IRS has issued a correction to a final rule concerning consistent basis reporting requirements for estates and persons acquiring property from a decedent. This correction clarifies specific aspects of the reporting obligations previously established in the final rule.

Finnish Financial Sector Capital Strong; Cautious Regulatory Simplification Urged

The Finnish Financial Supervisory Authority (FIN-FSA) reported that the Finnish financial sector's capital position remained strong in 2025, with improved solvency ratios in the banking and employee pension sectors. The FIN-FSA supports cautious regulatory simplification proposed by EU authorities, emphasizing that it must not compromise the sector's resilience or stability.

Bank of England Weekly Report Data

The Bank of England has published its weekly report data for March 18, 2026. The report details the latest figures for the Bank's sterling and foreign currency assets and liabilities, including reserves balances, notes in circulation, and various lending operations.

Ortho Connect Medical Device Recall for Incorrect Test Results

Health Canada has issued a Type II recall for the Ortho Connect medical device manufactured by Biomedical Data Solutions Limited due to the potential for incorrect test results. The recall affects specific lot and model numbers, with a recall date of February 19, 2026.

UniCel DxI 600 Total T4 Assay Recall

Health Canada has issued a Type II recall for the UniCel DxI 600 Access Immunoassay System-Total T4 Assay due to a negative bias that can cause false low patient results. The recall affects specific lot numbers and poses a medium safety risk. Healthcare providers are advised to contact the manufacturer for further information.

Health Canada: Nitrous Oxide Chargers Sold for Inhalation Without Authorization

Health Canada has issued a recall for Nitrous Oxide Chargers sold by Polar Imports Canada for inhalation without market authorization. The agency warns consumers not to inhale these products for recreational purposes and to seek medical attention if side effects occur.

Wilson v. Murrill - Court Opinion on Subject Matter Jurisdiction

The Louisiana Court of Appeal issued an opinion in the case of Phillip Allen Wilson v. Liz Murrill. The court granted in part and denied in part a writ, specifically addressing the exception of lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The opinion clarifies the definition and source of subject matter jurisdiction in Louisiana courts.

State of Louisiana v. Jeremy Dillion - Criminal Appeal

The Louisiana Court of Appeal affirmed the conviction and sentence of Jeremy Dillion. The court upheld the district court's judgment adjudicating Dillion as a quadruple felony offender and resentencing him to forty years imprisonment for home invasion.

A-1 Contractors v. Spinks Construction and Travelers Casualty - Court Opinion

The Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit, issued a writ denial in the case of A-1 Contractors of Louisiana, Inc. v. Spinks Construction, Inc. and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America. The court's decision pertains to supervisory writs filed from the 19th Judicial District Court.

State of Louisiana v. Don C. Woods - Criminal Conviction Affirmed

The Louisiana Court of Appeal affirmed the obstruction of justice conviction of Don C. Woods. The court found no error in the trial court's proceedings. Woods was also indicted for second-degree murder but later pleaded guilty to manslaughter.

State v. Jason Saizan - Criminal Conviction Cross-Examination

The Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit, granted in part and denied in part a writ from the State regarding a criminal case. The court reversed the district court's ruling that prohibited the State from using the defendant's prior conviction, allowing cross-examination on this matter if the defendant testifies.

State of Louisiana v. Ryan Volo - Criminal Case Opinion

The Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit, issued an opinion in the case of State of Louisiana v. Ryan Volo. The court denied the supervisory writs filed by Ryan Volo. The case originated from the 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge.