United States v. Anthony Lawrence - Criminal Conviction Appeal

The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Anthony Ray Lawrence for attempting to entice a minor. The court held that the jury was not required to unanimously agree on the specific underlying state offense supporting the conviction, citing existing precedent.

Raymond Strong v. Secretary, Department of Corrections - Habeas Corpus Appeal

The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has issued a non-precedential opinion in the case of Raymond Strong v. Secretary, Department of Corrections. The court determined it lacks jurisdiction over the appeal, finding the notice of appeal was not timely filed and did not qualify for reopening the appeal period.

United States v. Cristino Mendoza Torres - Sentencing Appeal

The Eleventh Circuit vacated and remanded a sentencing decision for Cristino Mendoza Torres due to the district court's failure to explain its upward variance. The court found the original sentencing hearing was too brief and lacked sufficient explanation for the sentence imposed.

Upside Foods Inc v. Commissioner, Florida Department of Agriculture - Preemption of Lab-Grown Meat Ban

The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals is reviewing a case where Upside Foods Inc. is challenging Florida's SB 1084, which bans the sale of lab-grown meat. Upside Foods argues that the federal Poultry Products Inspection Act preempts this state law. The court must determine if the Florida ban is preempted by federal regulation.

Grace Solis v. Citibank, N.A. - Consumer Protection Lawsuit

The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal of a lawsuit filed by Grace and Shirley Solis against Citibank, N.A., and others. The lawsuit alleged violations of the Florida Consumer Collection Practices Act, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, and a Florida criminal witness tampering statute, stemming from a foreclosure proceeding.

United States v. Paul E. Senat - Appeal of Compassionate Release Denial

The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has issued a non-precedential opinion in the case of United States v. Paul E. Senat. The court addressed Senat's pro se appeal from a district court order denying his motion for compassionate release. The appeal was dismissed as untimely.

United States v. Daniel Wert - Criminal Appeal

The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial of Daniel Wert's motion for compassionate release. Wert is serving a life sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana and cocaine, stemming from a 1997 conviction.

Eddie Denhardt v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A.

The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision to dismiss Eddie Denhardt's claims against Wells Fargo Bank N.A. Denhardt had alleged state law claims for conversion and money had and received concerning excess funds from a tax sale of real property. The court found no error in the dismissal.

Michael Haspel v. Centurion of Florida, LLC - Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Jurisdiction

The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal of Michael Haspel v. Centurion of Florida, LLC for lack of jurisdiction. The court found the district court's order was not final as claims against three defendants remained pending, and the order was not certified for immediate appeal.

United States v. Henry Guice, Jr. - Criminal Conviction Appeal

The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial of Henry Guice, Jr.'s motion to suppress self-incriminating statements. Guice, a public employee, argued his statements were coerced due to an administrative policy requiring cooperation or facing discipline, without being advised of his Garrity rights. The court found no error in the denial.

Bloch v. Bloch - Motion for Reconsideration Denied

The Intermediate Court of Appeals of the State of Hawaiʻi denied a motion for reconsideration filed by Defendant-Appellant David Michael Bloch. The court found no points of law or fact that it had overlooked or misapprehended in its prior Summary Disposition Order.

Trust of Itsuto Okamoto appeal affirmed in part, vacated, remanded

The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals affirmed in part and vacated/remanded a lower court's decision regarding the distribution of the Emekona Property from the Revocable Trust of Itsuto Okamoto. The appeal stemmed from a petition to compel the trustee to distribute trust property according to the trust's terms.

Hawaii Supreme Court Affirms Conviction of Alfred Oscar Pasley

The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Alfred Oscar Pasley for multiple felony charges, including kidnapping, attempted sexual assault, assault, terroristic threatening, and sexual assault. The court rejected Pasley's arguments regarding evidence admission and ineffective counsel, upholding the circuit court's judgment.

Jones v. City Of Oakland - Order Granting Motion to Dismiss

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California issued an order granting a motion to dismiss in the case Jones v. City Of Oakland. The order, signed by Judge Rita F. Lin, grants the motion with leave to amend.

ANSM Safety Alert: Manual Ventilator

The French ANSM has updated a safety alert regarding manual ventilators (Bavu) manufactured by Intersurgical. This update expands the scope of devices affected by a previous safety action initiated in May 2025, with users receiving updated correspondence.

ANSM Safety Alert: Kwik-Stik and Lyfo Disk Campylobacter jejuni Controls

The French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety (ANSM) has issued a safety alert regarding bacteriology controls for Kwik-Stik and Lyfo Disk Campylobacter jejuni products from Microbiologics. This notice informs laboratories of a security action implemented by the manufacturer.

ANSM Safety Information: Urology/Gynecology Suction Device

The French ANSM has been informed of a lot recall initiated by Clinical Innovations, LLC for their KIWI Omni Vacuum Delivery System suction device. This safety action is registered under number R2607844 and is directed at pharmacies and healthcare facilities.

Multiple Vulnerabilities in Google Chrome

CERT-FR has issued an advisory regarding multiple vulnerabilities discovered in Google Chrome. The advisory urges users to refer to Google's security bulletin for patch information, as these vulnerabilities could lead to unspecified security issues.

Spring Cloud Config Vulnerability Allows Server-Side Request Forgery

CERT-FR has issued an advisory regarding a critical vulnerability (CVE-2026-22739) in Spring Cloud Config versions prior to 3.1.13, 4.1.9, 4.2.6, 4.3.2, and 5.0.2. The vulnerability allows for Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), enabling attackers to potentially compromise server security.

strongSwan Remote Denial of Service Vulnerability

CERT-FR has issued a security advisory regarding a remote denial of service vulnerability (CVE-2026-25075) in strongSwan versions prior to 6.0.5. The advisory urges users to refer to the vendor's security bulletin for patch information.

LibreNMS Vulnerability Allows Remote Code Execution

CERT-FR has issued an advisory regarding a critical vulnerability in LibreNMS versions prior to 26.3.0. This vulnerability allows for remote code execution and data integrity compromise. Users are advised to consult the LibreNMS security bulletin for patch information.

VMware Tanzu for Postgres Vulnerability Allows Remote Code Execution

CERT-FR has issued a security advisory regarding a vulnerability in VMware Tanzu for Postgres that allows for remote code execution. Affected versions include multiple release lines prior to specific patch levels. Users are advised to consult VMware's security bulletin for remediation.

Xen Vulnerability Allows Security Policy Bypass

CERT-FR has issued an advisory regarding a vulnerability in Xen, identified as CVE-2026-31788. This vulnerability allows an attacker to bypass security policies. Affected systems are instances of Xen on Linux that have not applied specific security patches.

Trend Micro Deep Discovery Inspector Vulnerability Allows Remote Code Execution

CERT-FR has issued an advisory regarding a critical vulnerability in Trend Micro Deep Discovery Inspector. The vulnerability, identified as CVE-2025-15467, allows for remote code execution and denial of service. Affected versions require immediate patching.

Multiple Ruby on Rails Vulnerabilities Allow Remote Code Execution

CERT-FR has issued an advisory regarding multiple vulnerabilities discovered in Ruby on Rails versions. These vulnerabilities could allow attackers to achieve remote code execution, denial of service, or data integrity breaches. Affected systems include various versions of actionpack, actionview, activestorage, and activesupport.

Dr. Angus J. Michaels Voluntary Practice Restrictions Agreement

The Massachusetts Board of Registration in Medicine and Dr. Angus J. Michaels have entered into a Voluntary Agreement for Practice Restrictions (VAPR). This agreement replaces a previous non-practice agreement and restricts Dr. Michaels' patient encounters to telehealth only, prohibiting in-person visits.

Adrian Gore Jr. v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision in the case of Adrian Maurice Gore, Jr. v. State of Florida. The appellate court's disposition was 'Affirmed,' indicating no change to the original ruling.

Janvier v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision in the case of John Peterson Janvier v. State of Florida. The appeal, identified by docket number 6D2024-2165, was reviewed and the disposition was 'Affirmed'.

Michael Jeffrey Friedman v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal

The District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the lower court's decision in the case of Michael Jeffrey Friedman v. State of Florida. The appeal, identified by docket number 5D2025-3393, resulted in the affirmation of the original ruling.

Kotch v. Sanford Health - Appeal Affirmed

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision in the case of Kotch v. Sanford Health. The appeal, identified by docket number 6D2025-0921, concerned a dispute involving Sanford Health and The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society. The court's disposition was to affirm the prior ruling.

Fraziars v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal

The District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the lower court's decision in the case of Fredrick Leon Fraziars v. State of Florida. The appeal, identified by docket number 5D2025-0987, was affirmed without a specific opinion detailing the grounds for the decision.

Coble v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal

The District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the lower court's decision in the case of John Nathanael Coble v. State of Florida. The appeal, identified by docket number 5D2024-2522, was affirmed on March 24, 2026, with no known citations.

Antuan Jmal Davis v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal

The District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the lower tribunal's decision in the case of Antuan Jmal Davis v. State of Florida. The appeal, docketed under case number 6D2024-2784, concerned a prior ruling from the Osceola County Circuit Court.

Ruggiero v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal Affirmance

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision in Thomas Raymond Ruggiero v. State of Florida. The appellate court issued its opinion on March 24, 2026, upholding the disposition of the case.

Barbara Byron v. State Farm Florida Insurance Company - Insurance Dispute

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court's decision in the case of Barbara Byron v. State Farm Florida Insurance Company. The appeal concerned an unspecified dispute, and the appellate court upheld the prior ruling without modification. The case number is 5D2024-3542.

Judson W. Arne v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal

The District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the lower court's decision in the case of Judson W. Arne v. State of Florida. The appeal concerned a criminal matter, and the court's disposition was to affirm the prior ruling without known citations.

Gambrell v. Gambrell - Florida Appeals Court Affirms Ruling

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court's ruling in the case of Gary Clyde Gambrell v. Mary Robin Gambrell. The appellate court's decision means the original judgment stands, with no further details provided on the specific nature of the case or the original ruling.

Nelson v. State - Criminal Appeal Affirmation

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed a lower tribunal's decision in the case of Paul S. Nelson v. State of Florida. The appeal, identified by docket number 6D2024-0507, was reviewed and the disposition was affirmed.

Trevin Marcus v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal

The District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the lower tribunal's decision in the case of Trevin Marcus v. State of Florida. The appeal was filed pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2). The court issued its decision on March 24, 2026.

Michael Lewis v. Florida - Affirmation of Lower Court Ruling

The District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed a lower court ruling in the case of Michael Leroy Lewis v. State of Florida. The disposition of the case was affirmed on March 24, 2026, with no known citations or authorities cited.

Booher v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal

The District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the lower court's decision in the case of Douglass Phillip Booher v. State of Florida. The appeal concerned a criminal matter, and the court's disposition was to uphold the previous ruling without modification.

Dauber v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision in the case of Mary Elizabeth Dauber v. State of Florida. The appeal was filed under docket number 5D2025-1975. The court's decision means the original ruling stands.

Shapiro v. Florida - Criminal Appeal

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision in Shapiro v. Florida. The case, identified by docket number 5D2025-0769, involved a criminal appeal. The court's disposition was 'Affirmed,' indicating no change to the original ruling.

Carlyle v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision in the case of Jason Ramon Carlyle v. State of Florida. The appeal, identified by docket number 5D2025-2492, resulted in the affirmation of the original disposition.

Deidra Ashley Haney v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court's ruling in the case of Deidra Ashley Haney v. State of Florida. The appellate court's decision means the original judgment stands. No new legal precedent or significant regulatory changes are indicated by this affirmation.

Raishion Gist v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision in Raishion Gist v. State of Florida. The case, identified by docket number 5D2024-3460, involved a criminal appeal. No specific penalties or new compliance requirements were detailed in this disposition.

NY Essential Plan Coverage Preserved for 1.3M New Yorkers

The New York State Department of Health announced federal approval to transition the Essential Plan back to Basic Health Program authority, preserving coverage for 1.3 million New Yorkers. However, approximately 450,000 individuals will lose eligibility for the Essential Plan starting July 1, 2026, and will instead be directed to Qualified Health Plans.

JD Advisors and John Davenport Consent Order

The Connecticut Department of Banking has issued a consent order against JD Advisors, LLC and its control person John F. Davenport. The order resolves allegations stemming from an examination and investigation into potential violations of the Connecticut Uniform Securities Act and its regulations. The respondents' registrations expired on December 31, 2025.

Southshore 2 Homeowners Association Intervention Granted

The Idaho Public Utilities Commission granted the Southshore 2 Homeowners Association's petition to intervene in Case No. SSW-W-26-01. The order directs all parties to comply with commission rules and serve all future documents on the newly admitted intervenor.

Idaho PUC Final Order on Avista Energy Efficiency Expenses

The Idaho Public Utilities Commission has issued a final order approving Avista Corporation's 2024 electric and natural gas energy efficiency expenses. The Commission approved $17,313,338 in electric expenditures and $2,279,811 in natural gas expenditures as prudently incurred. The order also directs Avista to adjust its evaluation method for natural gas furnace measures.