Raishion Gist v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal
Summary
The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision in Raishion Gist v. State of Florida. The case, identified by docket number 5D2024-3460, involved a criminal appeal. No specific penalties or new compliance requirements were detailed in this disposition.
What changed
The District Court of Appeal of Florida has affirmed the lower court's decision in the case of Raishion Gist v. State of Florida, identified by docket number 5D2024-3460. This appellate ruling signifies that the previous judgment stands, and no further judicial review at this level will alter the outcome. The document does not specify the nature of the original charges or the specific legal arguments presented, but the affirmation indicates the appeals court found no reversible error in the trial court's proceedings.
For regulated entities, particularly those involved in criminal justice or facing appeals, this decision reinforces the existing legal precedent. As this is an appellate affirmation, there are no new compliance obligations or deadlines imposed. The primary implication is the finality of the lower court's decision for the parties involved. No penalties are detailed in this specific appellate opinion, as it concerns the affirmation of a prior judgment.
Source document (simplified)
Jump To
Top Caption Disposition Combined Opinion
Support FLP
CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.
Please become a member today.
March 24, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note
Raishion Gist v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Citations: None known
- Docket Number: 5D2024-3460
Disposition: Affirmed
Disposition
Affirmed
Combined Opinion
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
Case No. 5D2024-3460
LT Case No. 2022-CF-007584-A
RAISHION GIST,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.
Jonathan D. Sacks, Judge.
Rick A. Sichta and Susanne K. Sichta, of The Sichta Firm,
LLC, Jacksonville, for Appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate,
Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
March 24, 2026
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
JAY, C.J., and LAMBERT and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
2
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get Courts & Legal alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when FL District Court of Appeal Opinions publishes new changes.