Shapiro v. Florida - Criminal Appeal
Summary
The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision in Shapiro v. Florida. The case, identified by docket number 5D2025-0769, involved a criminal appeal. The court's disposition was 'Affirmed,' indicating no change to the original ruling.
What changed
The District Court of Appeal of Florida has affirmed the lower court's decision in the case of Michael Craig Shapiro v. State of Florida. The appeal, bearing docket number 5D2025-0769, was reviewed by the court, which issued an 'Affirmed' disposition on March 24, 2026. This ruling indicates that the appellate court found no grounds to overturn the original judgment.
This decision has no immediate compliance implications for regulated entities, as it pertains to a specific criminal appeal. However, legal professionals involved in criminal defense or prosecution in Florida should note the outcome and the court's reasoning, which may inform future case strategies. The document is a final appellate decision and does not impose new regulatory requirements or deadlines.
Source document (simplified)
Jump To
Top Caption Disposition Combined Opinion
Support FLP
CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.
Please become a member today.
March 24, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note
Michael Craig Shapiro v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Citations: None known
- Docket Number: 5D2025-0769
Disposition: Affirmed
Disposition
Affirmed
Combined Opinion
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
Case No. 5D2025-0769
LT Case No. 2022-CF-003038-A
MICHAEL CRAIG SHAPIRO,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Lake County.
Cary Frank Rada, Judge.
Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and George D.E. Burden,
Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Whitney
Brown Hartless, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for
Appellee.
March 24, 2026
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
EDWARDS, EISNAUGLE, and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
2
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get Courts & Legal alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when FL District Court of Appeal Opinions publishes new changes.