Bloch v. Bloch - Motion for Reconsideration Denied
Summary
The Intermediate Court of Appeals of the State of Hawaiʻi denied a motion for reconsideration filed by Defendant-Appellant David Michael Bloch. The court found no points of law or fact that it had overlooked or misapprehended in its prior Summary Disposition Order.
What changed
The Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaiʻi has issued an order denying a motion for reconsideration filed by Defendant-Appellant David Michael Bloch in case CAAP-24-0000459. The motion sought reconsideration of the court's Summary Disposition Order dated March 10, 2026. The court determined that the motion did not present any new legal or factual points that were overlooked or misapprehended.
This denial is a final procedural step in the appellate process for this specific motion. For legal professionals involved in the case, this order confirms the prior disposition stands and no further reconsideration will be granted on this matter. There are no immediate compliance actions required for regulated entities outside of the parties directly involved in this specific litigation.
Source document (simplified)
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-24-0000459 24-MAR-2026 07:50 AM Dkt. 198 ODMR NO. CAAP-24-0000459 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I ANNETTE BLOCH, Plaintiff-Appellee,
DAVID MICHAEL BLOCH, Defendant-Appellant APPEAL FROM THE FAMILY COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT (CASE NO. 3FDV-22-0000791)
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
(By: Leonard, Presiding Judge, Hiraoka and Guidry, JJ.)
Upon consideration of Self-Represented Defendant- Appellant David Michael Bloch's (Bloch) "Motion Requesting Reconsideration, Dkt. 190, Summary Disposition Order (Therein, EXH A)" (Motion for Reconsideration), filed on March 17, 2026, it appears that: (1) Bloch moves for reconsideration of the court's Summary Disposition Order, filed on March 10 2026; and
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER (2) The Motion for Reconsideration presents no point of law or fact that this court overlooked or misapprehended. See Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 40(b). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Reconsideration is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, March 24, 2026. /s/ Katherine G. Leonard Presiding Judge /s/ Keith K. Hiraoka Associate Judge /s/ Kimberly T. Guidry Associate Judge
Named provisions
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get Courts & Legal alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when Hawaii Supreme Court publishes new changes.