IMAGINERA Registered Trademark - Software for Cardboard Boxes

The USPTO has registered the trademark IMAGINERA (TM74556292) for software used in the manufacturing of cardboard boxes. The trademark was registered on March 25, 2026, with a filing date of August 2, 1994.

Amicus Attorney Trademark Registration

The USPTO has registered the trademark 'Amicus Attorney' for software used in information management, calendaring, scheduling, docketing, and research. The trademark was registered on March 25, 2026, following a filing date of July 7, 1994.

AMICUS Registered Trademark TM74546909

The USPTO has registered trademark TM74546909 for AMICUS, covering computer software productivity programs for information management, calendaring, scheduling, docketing, and research. The trademark was registered on March 25, 2026, with a filing date of July 7, 1994.

National Highways Authority of India vs Tarsem Singh - Review Petition

The Supreme Court of India heard a review petition filed by the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) seeking to recall an earlier order dated February 4, 2025. This order had dismissed NHAI's application for clarification regarding a prior judgment from September 19, 2019.

Rajesh Goyal vs M/S Laxmi Construction - Civil Appeal

The Supreme Court of India granted leave to appeal in the case of Rajesh Goyal vs M/S Laxmi Construction. The appeal challenges a High Court order that allowed a landlord's appeal, setting aside a prior order that had permitted the restoration of proceedings initiated by the tenant.

Steag Energy Services (India) Pvt. Ltd vs Gspc Pipavav Power Company Ltd. - Civil Appeal

The Supreme Court of India has granted leave to appeal in the case of Steag Energy Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs. GSPC Pipavav Power Company Ltd. The appeals arise from judgments concerning a public tender for the operation and maintenance of a power plant, specifically addressing the Quality and Cost Building System (QCBS) evaluation criteria.

Sharada Sanghi vs Asha Agarwal - Civil Appeal

The Supreme Court of India has issued a judgment in the civil appeal case of Sharada Sanghi & Ors. vs. Asha Agarwal & Ors. The appeal challenges a High Court judgment that dismissed a second appeal, affirming a lower court's decree. The case involves a dispute over specific performance of an agreement for sale of immovable property.

Charul Shukla vs State of U.P. - Criminal Appeal

The Supreme Court of India granted leave to appeal against a High Court order that declined to quash criminal proceedings. The case involves charges under Sections 498A, 323, and 313 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.

State of Maharashtra vs Reliance Industries Ltd - Electricity Duty Exemption Withdrawal

The Supreme Court of India has ruled on appeals concerning the withdrawal of electricity duty exemptions for captive power generators in Maharashtra. The judgment addresses whether the State government can revoke exemptions previously granted under Section 5A of the Bombay Electricity Duty Act, 1958.

Andanayya vs Deputy Chief Engineer - Land Acquisition Compensation

The Supreme Court of India granted leave to appeal in a case concerning land acquisition compensation. The appellants, landowners, are aggrieved by the High Court's rejection of their second application for re-determination of compensation, seeking parity with other landowners who received enhanced awards.

Southern Power vs Green Infra - Electricity Tariff Determination

The Supreme Court of India has ruled on the scope of a State Electricity Regulatory Commission's (SERC) power to determine electricity tariffs, specifically addressing whether SERCs can factor in Generation Based Incentives (GBI) granted under Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE) policies. The judgment clarifies the exclusive jurisdiction of SERCs in tariff fixation.

Sandeep Yadav vs Satish - Criminal Appeal

The Supreme Court of India granted leave to appeal a High Court order concerning a criminal trial. The High Court had set aside a prior order and directed the trial to proceed afresh under specific sections of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The appeal challenges this High Court decision.

Former Chief Deputy Convicted of Felony Corruption Charges

A former Chief Deputy with the Hocking County Sheriff's Office, Caleb Moritz, has been convicted of seven felony corruption charges, including corrupting another with drugs and intimidation. The conviction follows a jury trial led by the Ohio Attorney General's Special Prosecutions Section. Moritz is scheduled for sentencing on May 1, 2026.

Pole Barn Contractor Sentenced for Defrauding Consumers

The Ohio Attorney General's Office announced that a pole barn contractor, Ryan C. Needels, has been sentenced to 17 to 22 years in prison and ordered to pay $448,000 in restitution for defrauding consumers of over $400,000. Needels was convicted on 47 felony counts, including engaging in a pattern of corrupt activity and theft.

DWC Adopts Updates to MTUS Drug List

The California Division of Workers’ Compensation (DWC) has updated the Medical Treatment Utilization Schedule (MTUS) Drug List, effective April 30, 2026. These updates, based on ACOEM Practice Guidelines, will affect the formulary for workers' compensation claims.

Enforcement Order: Freeman Financial Group Enlargement of Time

The Oklahoma Department of Securities has added a new enforcement order granting an unopposed application for enlargement of time to respond for Freeman Financial Group, LLC, Byron Kent Freeman, and Karen Lynne Freeman. The order is part of an ongoing case, CJ-25-9405.

Aluminum printing plates from China and Japan: Remand proceedings notice

The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has issued a notice of remand proceedings concerning its antidumping and countervailing duty investigations of aluminum lithographic printing plates from China and Japan. This notice outlines the procedures for complying with a court order to reconsider specific aspects of the original determination, including the definition of the domestic industry and the treatment of related parties.

ITC Finds Material Injury from Erythritol Imports from China

The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) determined that imports of erythritol from China, found by the Department of Commerce to be subsidized and sold at less than fair value, are causing material injury to the U.S. industry. This determination imposes duties on these imports.

Plywood Duty Investigations: Final Phase Scheduling

The U.S. International Trade Commission has scheduled the final phase of antidumping and countervailing duty investigations concerning hardwood and decorative plywood from China, Indonesia, and Vietnam. These investigations will determine if imports materially injure U.S. industries.

ITC Expedited Reviews for Citric Acid and Citrate Salts from China

The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has scheduled expedited reviews to determine if revoking antidumping and countervailing duty orders on citric acid and citrate salts from China would likely lead to material injury. The Commission found the domestic party response adequate and the respondent response inadequate, necessitating expedited reviews.

ITC Investigation on Hydrodermabrasion Systems - Violation Found

The U.S. International Trade Commission has determined a violation of section 337 occurred regarding hydrodermabrasion systems. While a limited exclusion order and cease and desist order were considered, their issuance is suspended due to patent expiration and a zero percent bond. The investigation is terminated.

FINTRAC Imposes $91,162.50 Administrative Monetary Penalty on Northern Isga Foundation

FINTRAC has imposed an administrative monetary penalty of $91,162.50 on Northern Isga Foundation, a non-profit charitable organization operating a casino. The penalty was issued on March 2, 2026, for non-compliance with anti-money laundering and terrorist financing regulations.

Public Law 119-80: Notice Waiver for Captain Cody Khork's Promotion

Public Law 119-80, issued by the U.S. Government Publishing Office, waives notice requirements for the promotion of Captain Cody Khork. This law specifically addresses a procedural aspect of a military promotion.

Doe et al v. Experity, Inc. d/b/a Clockwise MD - Civil Complaint

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California has filed a new civil case, Doe et al v. Experity, Inc. d/b/a Clockwise MD. The complaint was filed on March 26, 2026, and names Access Clinical Partners, LLC d/b/a GoHealth Urgent Care and Experity, Inc. d/b/a Clockwise MD as defendants.

AEMO Seeks Stakeholders for 2028 ISP Consumer Panel

The Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO) is seeking expressions of interest from stakeholders to join the 2028 Integrated System Plan (ISP) Consumer Panel. This independent advisory body provides a consumer-focused perspective on Australia's long-term energy planning.

BaFin Warns About Unlicensed Foris Capital Websites

BaFin has issued a warning regarding the websites aiforis.com and aiforis-trading.com, operated by Foris Capital. The firm is allegedly offering unauthorized investment services in Germany, falsely claiming licensing in Cyprus. BaFin advises consumers to exercise extreme caution with online investment offers.

BaFin Warns About green-lmtd.com Website

BaFin has issued a warning regarding the website green-lmtd.com, suspecting that its operators are offering financial, securities, and crypto-asset services in Germany without the required authorization. The website falsely claims supervision by a non-existent 'European Financial Supervisory Authority'.

BaFin Orders Unauthorized Insurance Business Cessation

BaFin has ordered Deutsche Krankenvorsorge GmbH and Deutsche Krankenunterstützungskasse e.V. to immediately cease their unauthorized insurance business. The companies offered a 'Private Patient' coverage that effectively bypassed statutory health insurance, leading to BaFin's intervention.

Court of Appeals Lacks Jurisdiction Over Appeal - Order Not Final

The Tennessee Court of Appeals has dismissed an appeal filed by Ocoee Ridge Phase I Homeowners’ Association, LLC. The court found that the order from which the appeal was sought was not a final appealable judgment, thus lacking jurisdiction. The dismissal is without prejudice, allowing for a new appeal after a final judgment is entered.

Walsh v. Walsh - Undue Influence Over Mother's Estate

The Tennessee Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's finding that both sons exerted undue influence over their aging mother regarding her estate. The court ordered the mother's home to be distributed according to her 1991 will and credited one son with rental income received after her death.

Parenting Plan Modified, Father Primary Parent, Ruling Affirmed

The Tennessee Court of Appeals affirmed a juvenile court's ruling modifying a permanent parenting plan, designating the father as the primary residential parent. The court found that the mother's housing instability constituted a material change affecting the child's well-being and attendance.

Lish v. Lowry - Partnership Dispute and Breach of Contract

The Tennessee Court of Appeals vacated a judgment in a partnership dispute case involving breach of contract claims. The court remanded the case for a more detailed order, stating that the trial court's findings of fact and conclusions of law were not sufficiently ascertainable to support the judgment.

Gear Isle Recalls Chocolate for Undeclared Sildenafil and Tadalafil

Gear Isle is voluntarily recalling its Gold Lion and ilum chocolate products nationwide due to undeclared sildenafil and tadalafil. These ingredients can interact with prescription medications and pose a serious health risk. Consumers are advised to stop using the product and return it for a refund.

Falcon Trading Company Recalls Organic Black Beans for Pesticide Residue

Falcon Trading Company, Inc. is recalling organic black beans and related products due to the presence of pesticide residue. The recall affects all lot numbers of specific items sold in bulk. Consumers are urged to return the products for a full refund.

State v. Bebee - Reversal of Postconviction Relief Denial

The Ohio Court of Appeals reversed a trial court's denial of postconviction relief for LaJuan Bebee. The appellate court found that the trial court erred by failing to issue required findings of fact and conclusions of law. The case is remanded for the trial court to provide these findings.

State v. Pennington - Allied Offense Determination Appeal

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's denial of D'Angelo Pennington's motion for an allied-offense determination. The court found Pennington's arguments were either not properly before the court or barred by res judicata. The appeal raised multiple assignments of error concerning plea colloquy, sentencing, and double jeopardy.

Cox v. Glenville Homes, III, L.P. - Res Judicata and Compulsory Counterclaim

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision in Cox v. Glenville Homes, III, L.P., ruling that the appellant's claims were barred by res judicata and compulsory counterclaim rules. The court found that the appellant's claims arose from the same landlord-tenant dispute previously adjudicated in housing court.

State v. Ramirez - Felony Drug Possession Conviction Affirmed

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed the felony drug possession conviction of Alejandro Ramirez. The court found no reversible error in the trial court's proceedings and upheld the 11-month prison sentence imposed.

Smith & Condeni, LLP v. Cavitch Familo & Durkin Co., LPA - Attorney-Client Relationship

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's decision granting a motion for judgment on the pleadings in favor of Cavitch Familo & Durkin Co., LPA. The court found that a disassociated partner lacked the authority to retain legal representation for the partnership from which they had disassociated, thus no attorney-client relationship was formed.

CPC Parts Delivery, LLC v. Ohio Bur. of Workers' Comp. - Equal Protection Claims

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed summary judgment for the Bureau of Workers' Compensation, ruling that appellants failed to demonstrate disparate treatment in their equal protection claims. The court found that the appellants could not show they were treated differently than similarly situated parties.

Evans v. Davis - Affirmation of Trial Court Judgment

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's judgment in Evans v. Davis, upholding the magistrate's decision. The court found that the appellant failed to provide a transcript or affidavit of evidence, preventing review of her assignments of error and requiring acceptance of the trial court's factual findings.

In re M.C. - Permanent Custody Ruling

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a juvenile court's decision to grant permanent custody of a minor child to the Cuyahoga County Division of Children and Family Services and terminate the mother's parental rights. The court found no merit in the mother's claims of procedural irregularities, withheld evidence, or altered documentation.

Court erred denying protective order for medical records

The Ohio Court of Appeals reversed in part a lower court's decision, finding that the domestic relations court erred in denying a protective order to limit the dissemination of medical records in a divorce proceeding. The court affirmed the denial of a request to preclude the defendant from reviewing materially relevant evidence.

State v. Taylor - Affirmation of Ruling on Motion to Suppress

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's ruling denying a motion to suppress evidence in State v. Taylor. The court found that the traffic stop for window tint, the order to exit the vehicle, and the subsequent pat-down search were lawful under the Fourth Amendment and Ohio Constitution.

State v. Donerson - Cocaine Trafficking Conviction Affirmed

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed Andre Donerson's conviction and sentence for trafficking in cocaine. The court found that Donerson failed to demonstrate ineffective assistance of counsel or that the trial court failed to consider sentencing factors.

Cleveland v. Glover - DUI Appeal Denied, Conviction Affirmed

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's denial of a motion to suppress alcohol-test results in the case of Cleveland v. Glover. The appellate court found that the appellee demonstrated substantial compliance with relevant Ohio administrative code regarding alcohol testing standards.

Cleveland v. Brown - Affirmation of Conviction

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Tony C. Brown for criminal damaging or endangering. The court found that the conviction was supported by sufficient evidence and was not against the manifest weight of the evidence, and that Brown did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel.

Lupia v. Lupia - Divorce and School Placement

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's decision naming Rania Lupia as the residential parent for school placement purposes in a divorce case. Michael Lupia appealed the decision, but the court found no abuse of discretion in balancing the child's best interests.

State v. Giles - Sex Offender Classification Affirmed

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a defendant's convictions and sentence for abduction with sexual motivation and attempted felonious assault. The court found the guilty plea was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary, and that the trial court adequately explained the direct consequences of the Tier II sex offender classification.

State v. Johnson-Coleman - Sentencing Remanded for Aggravated Robbery and Felony Murder

The Ohio Court of Appeals vacated the sentence for State v. Johnson-Coleman and remanded the case for resentencing. The court sustained the appellant's third assignment of error, agreeing that theft is a lesser included offense of aggravated robbery and should have merged for sentencing purposes. The first two assignments of error regarding a mistrial motion and hearsay testimony were overruled.