State v. Brime - Affirmation of Denial of Plea Withdrawal

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of a defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea. The court found no abuse of discretion by the trial court, as the defendant failed to demonstrate actual innocence or manifest injustice.

Reading Recovery Council v. State - Standing Established, Judgment Reversed

The Ohio Court of Appeals reversed a lower court's decision in Reading Recovery Council of North America, Inc. v. State, finding that the appellants had established standing to sue. The court reversed the judgment in part and remanded the cause for further proceedings.

T.D. v. Ullom - Ohio Court of Appeals Affirms Stalking Order

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision to grant a civil stalking protection order against Gary Ullom. The order protects T.D. and her family from Ullom's alleged stalking behavior, which included threats and an attempt to hit T.D. with a tractor.

State v. Npimnee - Postconviction Relief Appeal

The Nebraska Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's denial of Hope T. Npimnee's amended motion for postconviction relief. The court found no error in the lower court's decision without an evidentiary hearing, upholding the conviction for first-degree sexual assault.

Tussahaw Reserves LLC v. Butts County - Case Vacated and Remanded

The Georgia Court of Appeals has vacated its prior judgment in Tussahaw Reserves LLC v. Butts County and remanded the case to the trial court. This action follows a directive from the Supreme Court of Georgia, which vacated the Court of Appeals' previous decision and provided specific instructions for further proceedings.

Myler v. Quintero - Interlocutory Application Granted

The Georgia Court of Appeals has granted an interlocutory application in the case of Myler v. Quintero. The court's order directs the Appellant to file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days and instructs the Clerk of State Court to include the order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

City of Marietta v. Bjf Jr., LLC - Interlocutory Application Denied

The Georgia Court of Appeals has denied an interlocutory application filed by the City of Marietta against Bjf Jr., LLC. The court issued its order on March 24, 2026, without known citations or further explanation beyond the denial.

Progressive Mountain Insurance Company v. Somer Reed - Interlocutory Application Granted

The Court of Appeals of Georgia has granted an interlocutory application in the case of Progressive Mountain Insurance Company v. Somer Reed. This decision allows the appellant to file a notice of appeal within 10 days, directing the Clerk of Superior Court to include this order in the record.

Shelby Peterson v. Lexington Intermodal, LLC - Case Transfer

The Georgia Court of Appeals has transferred two related cases, Shelby Peterson v. Lexington Intermodal, LLC and Gardner Blackburn v. Lexington Intermodal, LLC, to the Supreme Court. The cases involve appeals from trial court orders granting summary judgment, concerning whether Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations preempt Georgia law on respondeat superior liability.

REACH (Amendment) (No. 2) Regulations 2026

The UK Secretary of State has published draft REACH (Amendment) (No. 2) Regulations 2026, which propose to amend the assimilated REACH Regulation. These amendments extend compliance check periods for registration dossiers and adjust post-IP completion periods. The draft regulations have been laid before Parliament for approval.

Illinois DOR: 2026 Tax Processing Season Webinar Recordings Available

The Illinois Department of Revenue (IDOR) has made webinar recordings available for the 2026 tax processing season. These recordings cover topics such as Modernized E-File, Illinois Secure Choice, and various income and sales tax updates. The announcement also includes a scam alert regarding fraudulent communications impersonating IDOR.

CSSF Newsletter No 302 - March 2026

The CSSF has published its Newsletter No 302 for March 2026, providing updates on the latest CSSF publications and financial sector statistics. The newsletter aims to inform stakeholders about recent developments and data within Luxembourg's financial industry.

Dutton-Lainson Air Quality Permit Public Notice

The Nebraska Department of Water, Energy, and Environment is proposing to issue a Class I operating permit to Dutton-Lainson Co. for a fabricated metal products manufacturing facility. The public comment period for this proposed permit is open from March 24, 2026, to April 22, 2026.

CISA Advisory: Grassroots DICOM Memory Leak Vulnerability CVE-2026-3650

CISA has issued an advisory regarding a critical memory leak vulnerability (CVE-2026-3650) in Grassroots DICOM (GDCM) versions 3.2.2. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to cause a denial-of-service condition by sending a specially crafted file. The vulnerability affects the Healthcare and Public Health critical infrastructure sectors worldwide.

CISA Advisory: Pharos Controls Mosaic Show Controller Vulnerability

CISA has released an advisory regarding a critical vulnerability (CVE-2026-2417) in Pharos Controls Mosaic Show Controller firmware version 2.15.3. Successful exploitation could allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Pharos Controls recommends upgrading to version 2.16 or later.

CISA: Schneider Electric EcoStruxure Foxboro DCS Vulnerability Identified

CISA has issued an advisory regarding a deserialization of untrusted data vulnerability in Schneider Electric's EcoStruxure Foxboro DCS Control Software. The vulnerability, identified as CVE-2026-1286, could lead to loss of confidentiality, integrity, and potential remote code execution. Schneider Electric has released version CS 8.1 as a fix.

CISA: Schneider Electric Plant iT/Brewmaxx Vulnerabilities Allow Remote Code Execution

CISA has issued an advisory regarding multiple vulnerabilities in Schneider Electric's Plant iT/Brewmaxx software, versions 9.60 and above. Successful exploitation could lead to privilege escalation and remote code execution. The advisory provides specific CVE details and mitigation steps recommended by the vendor.

Jonathan Lowe appeals convictions for sexual battery, rape, incest, child abuse

The Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the convictions of Jonathan Maine Lowe for multiple sexual offenses against a minor, including aggravated sexual battery, rape of a child, incest, and child abuse. Lowe argued that his statements to the Department of Children's Services were obtained without Miranda warnings and that the jury instructions were flawed. The court found no error in the trial court's rulings.

Jacob Ray Lane v. State of Tennessee - Post-Conviction Relief Appeal

The Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the denial of Jacob Ray Lane's petition for post-conviction relief. Lane argued his guilty plea was unlawfully induced, but the court found no error in the lower court's judgment. The case involved a plea agreement for theft, possession of drug paraphernalia, and resisting arrest charges.

State of Tennessee v. Darrell Kindred Wakefield - Motion to Withdraw Guilty Plea

The Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed a trial court's denial of a motion to withdraw a guilty plea for sexual battery. The defendant argued his plea was not knowing and voluntary due to misunderstanding sex offender registry requirements. The court found no manifest injustice warranting withdrawal.

Graham v. DOC - Notice of Appeal Quashed

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has quashed the notice of appeal in Graham v. DOC, docket number 2 WAP 2026. The court cited procedural rules regarding the tolling of appeal periods by petitions for reconsideration.

Nodecker v. Prokay - Appeal Quashed

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has quashed the appeal in Nodecker v. Prokay due to the appellant's failure to file a timely brief. This action follows standard appellate procedure when filing deadlines are missed.

State Aid for Passenger Train Maintenance Workshops in Slovakia

The European Commission has decided not to raise objections to a state aid scheme by Slovakia for light maintenance of passenger trains in Žilina and Košice. The decision was made on March 16, 2026, and relates to passenger rail transport.

Freudenberg/Nilsk Foreign Subsidies Case Decision

The European Commission has issued a decision in the Freudenberg/Nilsk foreign subsidies case (FS.100300). The provisional deadline and suspension period under the Foreign Subsidies Regulation expired on March 23, 2026.

Apollo Funds / Lecta Foreign Subsidies Case

The European Commission's Foreign Subsidies Regulation case concerning Apollo Funds and Lecta has seen its provisional deadline and suspension period expire on March 24, 2026. This case investigates potential foreign subsidies impacting a concentration within the paper and pulp manufacturing sectors.

Merger M.12302: EPH, TTE, EFG - Simplified Merger Approval

The European Commission has approved the merger case M.12302 involving EPH, TTE, and EFG under the Simplified Merger Procedure. The decision was made on March 24, 2026, based on Council Regulation 139/2004.

August Image LLC v. Mei Lee Fleming Optometry PC - Copyright Infringement

August Image LLC has filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against Mei Lee Fleming Optometry PC d/b/a Luminance Vision Optometry in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case was filed on March 24, 2026, with a filing fee of $405.

Person v. Commonwealth of Virginia - Right-to-Arm Instruction

The Virginia Court of Appeals reversed a conviction, finding the trial court erred by refusing a "right-to-arm" jury instruction. The appellate court determined the instruction was a proper statement of law supported by evidence and that its refusal was not harmless error. The case is remanded for a new trial.

Court Upholds Dismissal of Estate Elective Share Complaint

The Virginia Court of Appeals upheld the dismissal of a complaint seeking an elective share of an estate. The court found that the appellant failed to sufficiently plead the validity of his signature on a premarital agreement and waiver, or that the agreements were procured involuntarily or were unconscionable.

Sean Marquise Hughes v. Commonwealth of Virginia - Drive-by Shooting Conviction Upheld

The Virginia Court of Appeals upheld a conviction for a drive-by shooting, affirming that circumstantial evidence was sufficient to identify the appellant as a participant. The court also ruled that a firearm equipped with an aftermarket selector switch designed to enable automatic fire qualifies as a machine gun under state law, even if temporarily inoperable.

Womack v. Commonwealth of Virginia - Affirmation of Judgment

The Virginia Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's judgment against Joseph Tyrone Womack. The court found no error in denying a motion to suppress evidence related to a drug distribution enterprise and affirmed the conviction for drug possession with intent to distribute. The court also ruled that claims regarding the admission of search warrants during sentencing and evidence sufficiency were waived.

Karen Taylor Kusterer v. Commonwealth of Virginia - Appeal Rights Waiver

The Virginia Court of Appeals upheld the dismissal of an appeal, ruling that a defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived her right to appeal under a deferred disposition agreement. The court found that statutory appeal rights can be waived if done intelligently, and the plea agreement explicitly reflected this waiver.

James Lee Woltz, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Virginia - Suspended Sentence Violation

The Virginia Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's decision finding James Lee Woltz, Jr. in violation of his suspended sentence terms, specifically for failing to complete a polygraph examination. The court also ruled that challenges to the constitutionality of the polygraph requirement were waived.

Virginia Court of Appeals upholds denial of guilty plea withdrawal

The Virginia Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's decision to deny a motion to withdraw guilty pleas. The court found that the guilty pleas were entered voluntarily and without material mistake of fact, and that the appellant failed to present a reasonable defense. The appellant was convicted of multiple counts of aggravated sexual battery and taking indecent liberties with a minor.

Brian Reese Cochran v. Commonwealth of Virginia - Probation Violation Appeal

The Virginia Court of Appeals upheld a trial court's decision to revoke Brian Reese Cochran's suspended sentence due to repeated probation violations. The court found no abuse of discretion in denying a continuance or a motion to recuse.

Amy Lynn Childress v. Jimmie DeWitt Childress, III - Child Access and Due Process

The Virginia Court of Appeals ruled that a trial court did not abuse its discretion in requiring a mother to complete psychiatric treatment before granting her access to her children. The court found no violation of due process rights or the ADA, and affirmed the trial court's retention of jurisdiction and restrictions on social media posting.

Amy Lynn Childress v. Commonwealth of Virginia - Contempt Judgment Affirmed

The Virginia Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's judgment finding Amy Lynn Childress in direct contempt for misbehavior in court. The court found that Childress disrupted the hearing and that her Sixth Amendment right to counsel did not apply to summary contempt adjudications. An ADA claim was also waived.

Sean Lohr v. Board of Visitors of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

The Virginia Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's judgment, dismissing Sean Lohr's claims with prejudice. The court found no error in the trial court's sustaining of a plea in bar and its determination that the pleadings were inadequate to identify defendants in their official capacities and that the retaliation claim was not adequately pleaded.

Neal v. Commonwealth of Virginia - Admissibility of Murder Evidence

The Virginia Court of Appeals allowed evidence of a murder defendant's involvement in another murder to be used to prove identity and a common plan. The court found that the probative value of this evidence outweighed its prejudicial effect.

Inova Alexandria Hospital v. Courtney Santora - Workers' Compensation

The Virginia Court of Appeals affirmed a Workers' Compensation Commission award to a nurse for PTSD and major depressive disorder. The court found these conditions to be compensable ordinary diseases of life arising from her employment caring for COVID-19 patients.

Celtic Bank Corporation v. Northwestern Residence, Inc. - Foreclosure Appeal

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed foreclosure orders against defendants, finding their fraud claims lacked merit. The court dismissed the defendants' counterclaims and upheld the summary judgment granted to Celtic Bank Corporation, leading to a final judgment of foreclosure.

L.G.-p. v. Riverview Medical Center - Claims Dismissed

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division has dismissed claims against Riverview Medical Center, Hackensack Meridian Health, and Dr. Joel Edman. The case involved allegations of supervisory failures regarding physician adherence to hospital policies and patient discharge standards for a jaundiced infant.

E.S. v. D.E.S. - Reverses TRO Dissolution, Remands

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division reversed the dissolution of two amended temporary restraining orders (ATROs) issued under the Prevention of Domestic Violence Act. The court also reinstated the ATROs and remanded the case for further proceedings, allowing the plaintiff to amend the ATROs to include allegations from denied TRO applications.

Dcpp v. I.L. - Parental Rights Termination

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division has issued a non-precedential opinion regarding the termination of parental rights for I.L. in the guardianship case of A.L.Z. and G.L.Z. The mother appeals the June 13, 2025 judgment, challenging the Division of Child Protection and Permanency's proof on specific statutory prongs.

Carrie Allen v. Christian Kirch - NJ Court Affirms NJM Ruling

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed a lower court's ruling that New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Company (NJM) has no duty to defend or indemnify Christian Kirch in a lawsuit stemming from a 2021 motor vehicle accident. The court found that Kirch lacked actual or implied permission to use the vehicle involved in the accident.

State of New Jersey v. Michael Cawley - Post-Conviction Relief Denial Affirmation

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed the denial of Michael Cawley's second petition for post-conviction relief. The decision pertains to his 2012 conviction and sentence for theft, kidnapping, and sexual assault.

Colorado AG Voids Unfair MV Realty Contracts, Saves Homeowners $8.4M

Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser announced an agreement voiding unfair long-term real estate contracts with MV Realty, clearing homeowners' property titles and saving them an estimated $8.4 million. The agreement also includes $600,000 in consumer restitution and permanently bars MV Realty from performing real estate brokerage services in Colorado.

NCUA Eighth Round of Deregulation Proposals

The NCUA has announced its eighth round of proposed regulatory changes, focusing on deregulation. This proposal aims to remove limits on federally insured credit unions' ability to purchase or participate in third-party serviced indirect auto loans, reducing regulatory burden and increasing flexibility for credit unions.

AG Torrez Leads 17 States Urging Congress to Close Data-Broker Loophole

New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez, leading 17 state attorneys general, urged Congress to close a data-broker loophole that allows federal agencies to conduct mass surveillance of Americans using commercially purchased data and AI tools. The letter calls for warrant requirements for digital data access and transparency standards for data brokers.

AG Torrez Sues Trump Admin Over USDA Funding Conditions

New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez joined 21 other attorneys general in suing the Trump Administration over its alleged unconstitutional attempt to impose conditions related to immigration, gender identity, and DEI on USDA funding. The lawsuit seeks to block the USDA from imposing these conditions on critical programs like SNAP, WIC, and the school lunch program.