Changeflow GovPing Courts & Legal Graham v. DOC - Notice of Appeal Quashed
Routine Enforcement Removed Final

Graham v. DOC - Notice of Appeal Quashed

Favicon for www.courtlistener.com Pennsylvania Supreme Court
Filed March 24th, 2026
Detected March 24th, 2026
Email

Summary

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has quashed the notice of appeal in Graham v. DOC, docket number 2 WAP 2026. The court cited procedural rules regarding the tolling of appeal periods by petitions for reconsideration.

What changed

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court, in its order dated March 24, 2026, quashed the notice of appeal filed in the case of Graham v. DOC, docket number 2 WAP 2026. The court's decision relies on established procedural rules, specifically referencing Sidkoff, Pincus, Greenberg & Green, P.O. v. Pennsylvania Nat. Mut. Cas. Ins. Co. and Pennsylvania Rule of Appellate Procedure 1701(b)(3), which govern the tolling of appeal periods by petitions for reconsideration.

This ruling means that the appeal will not proceed, effectively upholding the lower court's decision or prior procedural outcome. Legal professionals involved in appellate practice in Pennsylvania should ensure strict adherence to the rules regarding the timing and granting of reconsideration petitions to avoid similar outcomes. The decision highlights the critical importance of procedural compliance in maintaining the right to appeal.

What to do next

  1. Review Pa.R.A.P. 1701(b)(3) and Sidkoff, Pincus, Greenberg & Green, P.O. v. Pennsylvania Nat. Mut. Cas. Ins. Co. for guidance on appeal tolling.
  2. Ensure petitions for reconsideration are timely filed and granted within the prescribed period to preserve appeal rights.

Source document (simplified)

Jump To

Top Caption Unanimous Opinion

Support FLP

CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project
, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.

Please become a member today.

Join Free.law Now

March 24, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note

Graham, T., Aplt. v. DOC

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Unanimous Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
WESTERN DISTRICT

TERRENCE GRAHAM, No. 2 WAP 2026

Appellant

v.

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, KERI MOORE,
ASSISTANT CHIEF GRIEVANCE
OFFICER,

Appellees

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 24 th day of March, 2026, the Notice of Appeal is QUASHED. See

Sidkoff, Pincus, Greenberg & Green, P.O. v. Pennsylvania Nat. Mut. Cas. Ins. Co., 555

A.2d 1284, 1288 (Pa. 1989) (holding that, unless the trial court grants a petition for

reconsideration within the allotted period, the time for filing an appeal is not tolled);

Pa.R.A.P. 1701 (b)(3) (providing that the 30-day appeal period will be tolled only by a grant

of reconsideration within the time for filing a notice of appeal).

Named provisions

Unanimous Opinion

Source

Analysis generated by AI. Source diff and links are from the original.

Classification

Agency
PA Courts
Filed
March 24th, 2026
Instrument
Enforcement
Legal weight
Binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor
Document ID
No. 2 WAP 2026
Docket
2 WAP 2026

Who this affects

Applies to
Legal professionals
Activity scope
Appellate Procedure
Geographic scope
Pennsylvania US-PA

Taxonomy

Primary area
Judicial Administration
Operational domain
Legal
Topics
Appellate Procedure Civil Procedure

Get Courts & Legal alerts

Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when Pennsylvania Supreme Court publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.