Changeflow GovPing Courts & Legal Nodecker v. Prokay - Appeal Quashed
Routine Enforcement Removed Final

Nodecker v. Prokay - Appeal Quashed

Favicon for www.courtlistener.com Pennsylvania Supreme Court
Filed
Detected
Email

Summary

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has quashed the appeal in Nodecker v. Prokay due to the appellant's failure to file a timely brief. This action follows standard appellate procedure when filing deadlines are missed.

Published by PA Courts on courtlistener.com . Detected, standardized, and enriched by GovPing. Review our methodology and editorial standards .

What changed

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued an order on March 24, 2026, quashing the appeal in the case of Nodecker v. Prokay. The reason cited for quashing the appeal is the appellant's failure to file a timely brief, as per Pennsylvania Rule of Appellate Procedure 3305.

This decision means the appeal will not proceed further on its merits. Legal professionals involved in this case must acknowledge that the appeal has been dismissed. There are no compliance actions required for other entities, as this is a specific case outcome based on procedural default.

Archived snapshot

Mar 24, 2026

GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.

Jump To

Top Caption Unanimous Opinion

Support FLP

CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project
, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.

Please become a member today.

Join Free.law Now

March 24, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note

Nodecker, J., Aplt. v. Prokay, D.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Unanimous Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MIDDLE DISTRICT

JOHN NODECKER, : No. 54 MAP 2025
:
Appellant :
:
:
v. :
:
:
DONNA PROKAY, BILL MURRY, MARK :
ANDERSON, KATHY SETLOCK, :
JOHN/JANE DOES 1-3, MANHEIM :
TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT, :
EDUCATION SECRETARY NOE ORTEGA, :
EDUCATION SECRETARY ERIC :
HAGARTY, AND DEPARTMENT OF :
EDUCATION OPEN RECORDS OFFICER, :
ANGELA RIEGEL, :
:
Appellees :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 24th day of March, 2026, as Appellant failed to file a timely brief,

this appeal is QUASHED. See Pa.R.A.P. 3305.

Get daily alerts for Pennsylvania Supreme Court

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from PA Courts.

What's AI-generated?

The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
PA Courts
Filed
March 24th, 2026
Instrument
Enforcement
Legal weight
Binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor
Document ID
No. 54 MAP 2025
Docket
54 MAP 2025

Who this affects

Applies to
Legal professionals
Activity scope
Appellate Procedure
Geographic scope
Pennsylvania US-PA

Taxonomy

Primary area
Judicial Administration
Operational domain
Legal
Topics
Appellate Procedure Civil Litigation

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when Pennsylvania Supreme Court publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!