Legal Research

House Homeland Security Subcommittee Hearing on Modernizing DHS SRMA Role for Communications IT Sectors

The House Homeland Security Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Protection will hold a hearing on April 29, 2026 at 10:00 AM in 310 Cannon House Office Building, Washington, D.C. The hearing is titled 'Data Centers, Telecommunications Networks, and Space-Based Systems: Modernizing DHS's SRMA Role for the Communications and IT Sectors' and will examine how the Department of Homeland Security's Sector Risk Management Agency role should be modernized to address evolving threats to communications and IT infrastructure. Supporting documentation includes a hearing notice PDF.

NASA Budget Hearing - House Appropriations Subcommittee, 04/27/2026

The House Appropriations Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies will hold a budget hearing for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) on April 27, 2026 at 3:30 PM local time in Room 2358-A Rayburn House Office Building, Washington, D.C. The Honorable Jared Isaacman, NASA Administrator, is scheduled to appear as a witness. The witness statement PDF is available via the provided link.

Senate Armed Services Subcommittee on Strategic Forces Hearing on Missile Defense FY2027

The Senate Armed Services Subcommittee on Strategic Forces has scheduled an open hearing for April 27, 2026 at 3:30 PM local time in Room 222 of the Russell Senate Office Building in Washington, D.C. The hearing will examine Department of Defense missile defense activities as part of the review of the Defense Authorization Request for Fiscal Year 2027 and the Future Years Defense Program. The 119th Congress session runs from 2025 through 2026.

FY 2027 EPA Budget Hearing Before House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Environment

The House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Environment has scheduled a public hearing to examine the Environmental Protection Agency's Fiscal Year 2027 budget request. The hearing is set for April 28, 2026 at 10:00 AM local time in Room 2123 of the Rayburn House Office Building in Washington, D.C. Supporting documentation for the hearing was published on April 23, 2026.

Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee to Examine Interior Department FY2027 Budget Request

The Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources has scheduled an open hearing for April 29, 2026 at 9:30 AM local time to examine the President's proposed budget request for fiscal year 2027 for the Department of the Interior. The hearing will take place in Room 366 of the Dirksen Senate Office Building in Washington, D.C. This is a public committee event in the 119th Congress (2025-2026).

List of Government Ministries and Departments

This PIB India press release presents a comprehensive directory of Indian government ministries and departments available on the Press Information Bureau portal. The listing includes constitutional bodies (President's Secretariat, Vice President's Secretariat, Election Commission, Finance Commission), the Prime Minister's Office, Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha Secretariats, Cabinet Committees (including CCEA), and all Union ministries spanning agriculture, defense, finance, health, and infrastructure sectors. The page includes navigation filters for month and year selection but does not announce new regulatory requirements or policy changes.

Indian Government Ministries and Departments Directory

This PIB India page publishes a comprehensive directory of all Indian government ministries and departments, including constitutional bodies (President's Secretariat, Vice President's Secretariat, Prime Minister's Office, Election Commission, Finance Commission), cabinet committees (CCEA, Cabinet Committee on Infrastructure, Price, Investment), and all ministries including Finance, Health, Defense, Home Affairs, Commerce, Communications, and over 50 additional ministries covering agriculture, education, energy, environment, justice, transport, and social welfare. The page provides navigation access to press releases organized by ministry and date.

PIB India Press Release Index Page

PIB India maintains a navigational index page listing all ministries, departments, committees, and autonomous bodies of the Government of India. The page currently displays no active press releases, showing only a hierarchical taxonomy of government entities including 31 numbered sections spanning ministries from Agriculture to Youth Affairs, with links to mobile applications and archived Hindi releases from 2009-2017.

No Press Release Content Available

This PIB India press release page (PRID 2255667) displays no actual press release content. The page shows a comprehensive list of Indian government ministries and departments followed by the message "No release available" in Hindi. No regulatory action, announcement, or substantive content is present on this page.

PIB India Press Release Index - No Releases Available

This PIB India press release index page displays a directory of all Indian central government ministries, departments, and cabinet committees with no corresponding press release content currently available for the selected filters. The page includes date navigation options spanning January 2009 through December 2026, with the displayed message indicating no releases match the current query parameters.

PIB India Ministry Navigation Index

PIB India serves as a navigation index listing Indian government ministries for accessing press releases. The page displays all ministries including Finance, Health, Defence, and others, with month/year filtering options. Currently no press releases are available for the selected period — the message 'No releases available' is displayed.

Government of India Official Press Release Index

This page is the Press Information Bureau (PIB) India index for official government press releases. It lists the full directory of Indian government ministries, departments, and constitutional bodies available for release searches, and displays date-filtering controls for accessing historical press releases. No specific press release content is loaded — the page currently shows a 'No release available' message for the selected filters.

PIB India Press Release Index and Ministry Directory

PIB India operates the official press information portal for the Government of India. This page provides a directory of all Indian ministries and departments (including Agriculture, Finance, Health, Defense, and over 60 others) alongside date-based filters for browsing press releases from January 2009 to December 2026. The page currently displays a no-releases-available message for the selected period, with mobile app links for Android and iOS access to the PIB service.

Press Information Bureau Press Releases and Announcements

PIB India portal page displaying government ministry and department selectors. The page indicates no press releases are currently available for the selected date range, showing the message 'No releases available' (कोई रिलीज उपलब्ध नहीं है). Mobile application links for Android and iOS are provided.

Government Press Release Page Content Unavailable

PIB India website displays a content unavailable page for press release PRID=2255764. The page contains navigation links to various Indian government ministries and departments but no actual press release content. A Hindi message at the bottom indicates no release is available for this identifier.

PIB India Press Release Page Navigation

PIB India operates the official press release portal for the Government of India, publishing releases from over 50 ministries and departments. This navigation page provides filtered access to press releases by ministry, date (1-31 of each month), and year (2009-2026). The page notes that no release was available for the queried parameters.

Dillon Grundman Habeas Petition Denied

Federal inmate Dillon Grundman filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 challenging the Bureau of Prisons' PATTERN recidivism scoring methodology and the First Step Act credit application process. Grundman argued that prisoners should receive PATTERN score reductions beyond eleven programs and that the six-month warden petition requirement conflicts with the FSA. The Court denied the petition, finding that the FSA's statutory scheme does not create a constitutionally protected liberty interest in early release.

Glen Howder v. Jeffrey Wehking - Habeas Petition Survives Rule 4 Review

Glen Howder filed a federal habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging his Illinois convictions for soliciting child pornography and aggravated criminal sexual abuse, for which he is serving an aggregate sentence of 30 years. The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois conducted a Rule 4 preliminary review and found that it does not plainly appear from the petition that the petitioner is entitled to no relief. The court directed the respondent to file an answer or other pleading within 30 days (by May 13, 2026), with petitioner's reply due by June 12, 2026.

Shaquan Carter v. Justin Kulich - Prisoner Civil Rights Screening Order

The District Court screened a pro se prisoner's amended complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and designated three constitutional claims to proceed: a First Amendment retaliation claim against correctional officer Kulich for verbal threats in June and December 2025; an Eighth Amendment conditions of confinement claim against John Doe placement officer for housing Plaintiff in unsanitary cells from June 30 to mid-July 2025; and a Fourteenth Amendment due process claim against counselor Young for denying grievance forms on July 17, 2025. Claims not specifically addressed are dismissed without prejudice under Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly.

Millas v. Wadas - Habeas Petition Dismissed

Andrew Gerald Millas, an inmate at Federal Correctional Institution in Marion, Illinois, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 challenging restrictions to his phone privileges imposed after he allegedly directed his mother to post his writings online. The Court dismissed the petition without prejudice, holding that habeas corpus is not the proper vehicle to challenge conditions of confinement — such claims must instead be brought in a civil rights action. The case was assigned Docket No. 3:26-cv-00305 and was decided by Judge David W. Dugan.

Jazzlin Seiber v. Officer A. Smith - § 1983 Medical Disclosure Dismissed

The US District Court for the Western District of Virginia dismissed plaintiff Jazzlin Seiber's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint against Officer A. Smith on April 24, 2026. Seiber alleged that the defendant disclosed her medical history to others at the jail where she is incarcerated. The court held that neither HIPAA nor the Constitution provides a private right of action for the disclosure of prisoner medical records, and dismissed the complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1).

Stacy v. SWVRJA - Inmate § 1983 Claim Dismissed for Failure to State a Claim

Allison Stacy, a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Authority (SWVRJA), a medical defendant, and Counselor Trish Sutherland. The court dismissed the action summarily under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim. Stacy alleged she received the wrong obituary when informed of her father's death, was housed alone during her grief, and was on lockdown for 20 hours per day preventing medical treatment. The court found no constitutional violation: the jail entity cannot be sued under § 1983, the counselor's negligent delivery of a wrong obituary does not constitute cruel and unusual punishment, and Stacy failed to adequately plead deliberate indifference to serious medical needs.

Roberson v. Aramark Employment Discrimination Case Dismissed

Magistrate Judge William E. Duffin recommended dismissal of Tammi Roberson's second amended complaint against Aramark after screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The court found that even construing the pro se complaint liberally, Roberson failed to state a claim under Title VII because she did not allege her termination was connected to a protected characteristic. Roberson worked in food services at Brown Deer Middle/High School and was fired on May 9, 2025, after her wife had a verbal confrontation with co-workers. The court noted she had been granted unemployment benefits because Aramark had no good reason for termination, but this did not establish discriminatory conduct.

Priest Delon Butler v. City of Milwaukee et al. - Report & Recommendation Dismissing Public Defender Glover

Magistrate Judge Shihan Syl Toe issued a Report & Recommendation in Priest Delon Butler v. City of Milwaukee et al. (Case No. 25-CV-1653-SCD) recommending dismissal of defendant John C. Glover, a public defender, from Butler's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action. The magistrate found that criminal defense attorneys performing traditional lawyer functions do not act 'under color of state law' as required for § 1983 liability, citing Polk County v. Dodson, 454 U.S. 312 (1981). The recommendation awaits district judge review; parties have fourteen days to file objections.

Jeffrey Turner §1983 Complaint Dismissed, Habeas Remedy Required

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin granted prisoner Jeffrey Turner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, assessed an initial partial filing fee of $154.54, and dismissed his 42 U.S.C. §1983 civil rights complaint challenging his prison sentence calculation. The court held that because success on Turner's claim would require an earlier release, §1983 is unavailable and habeas corpus is his exclusive federal remedy. Turner was directed to exhaust state court remedies before pursuing federal habeas relief.

Juan Manzanares v. Michael Oslanzi and City of Spring Valley, Illinois

The United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois denied defendants' motion to dismiss in Manzanares v. Oslanzi, allowing the plaintiff's excessive force claim under the Fourth Amendment to proceed. The defendants had argued statutory immunity under the Illinois Tort Immunity Act and that video exhibits established their actions did not constitute willful and wanton conduct. The court rejected these arguments, permitting the case to advance beyond the pleading stage with claims that Officer Oslanzi placed the plaintiff in a headlock, grabbed him by handcuffs, and violently pulled him from a police vehicle, causing a torn rotator cuff requiring surgery.

Auston McLain v. R. Whiteman, et al. - Fourteenth Amendment Prisoner Civil Rights

The court conducted a merit review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A of pro se prisoner Auston McLain's civil rights complaint. The court found that Plaintiff states a Fourteenth Amendment claim against Defendants Whiteman and Damewood for subjecting him to dangerous conditions during transport (no seatbelt while in wheelchair following stroke), and a Fourteenth Amendment claim against Defendants Abernacki, Jean, and Jane Doe nurse for failure to provide adequate medical care. The court dismissed all other claims including Monell claims against Knox County and the Sheriff's Department for failure to allege a county policy, claims against high-level administrators for lack of personal involvement, and claims against John Doe U.S. Marshals.

Shirley Dean v. Dismass Charities, Inc., et al. - Title VII Claim Dismissed

Pro se plaintiff Shirley Dean filed an employment discrimination action pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 against Dismass Charities, Inc. in the Middle District of Alabama (Case No. 2:25-cv-543). The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation and dismissed the case without prejudice because Dean failed to exhaust administrative remedies—her EEOC Charge of Discrimination was filed approximately one year after the 180-day deadline expired on April 19, 2024. The court further held that Dean was not entitled to equitable tolling based on attorney neglect, finding she failed to demonstrate diligent pursuit of her rights or an extraordinary circumstance preventing timely filing.

Jessica Jay Scott et al v. Chilton County Department of Human Resources - Dismissal Under Younger Abstention

The US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama dismissed a parental rights complaint without prejudice on March 31, 2026, declining to reach the domestic relations exception analysis but abstaining under Younger v. Harris. Plaintiffs Jessica Jay Scott and John Burton Eubanks Jr. alleged constitutional violations stemming from child removal and termination of parental rights proceedings in state court after their acquittal on child abuse charges. The Magistrate Judge had recommended dismissal under the domestic relations exception to federal subject matter jurisdiction, which the District Court rejected as overbroad.

White Hall Entertainment v. Marshall - Electronic Bingo Facility Constitutional Challenge

White Hall Entertainment and five related entities operating an electronic bingo facility in White Hall, Alabama filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall, asserting constitutional claims under the First, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments. The case arises from two prior state court public nuisance lawsuits resulting in a permanent injunction and property forfeiture, with a final judgment currently pending appeal to the Alabama Supreme Court. The federal court granted in part and denied in part the AG's motion to dismiss.

Entry of Appearance, Case 4:26-cv-00610

An attorney has filed an Entry of Appearance in Case 4:26-cv-00610 before the US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. This is a standard procedural filing notifying the court that counsel has entered their appearance on behalf of a party. The filing does not contain substantive allegations, claims, or relief sought.

Sandoval Arellano v. Mullin et al

Yunivia Arely Sandoval Arellano filed a civil petition for writ of mandamus and complaint under the Administrative Procedure Act in the Northern District of California against Senator Markwayne Mullin, Joseph Edlow, Ted Kim, Brett Lassen, Danielle Lehman, Kashyap Patel, the U.S. Attorney, and the U.S. Attorney General. The case, docketed as 3:26-cv-03369 under 'Other Immigration Actions', carries a $405 filing fee and was filed on April 21, 2026. The court issued summons to all defendants on April 22, 2026, and a summons was returned executed on April 26, 2026, indicating service has been completed on all parties.

Ochoa et al v. Google LLC - Notice of Removal from Santa Clara County

Ochoa et al filed a civil action against Google LLC in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, Oakland Division (Case No. 4:26-cv-03587). Google LLC filed a Notice of Removal removing the case from Santa Clara County Superior Court, where the prior case number was 24CV434665. Google LLC also filed a Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Alphabet Inc. as its corporate parent and XXVI Holdings Inc. as the holding company of both XXVI Holdings Inc. and Google LLC.

Osio v. Maduro - Court Denies Anschütz Motion to Dissolve Garnishment

The US District Court for the Southern District of Florida adopted Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres's Report and Recommendation and denied Anschütz GmbH's Motion to Dissolve Writ of Garnishment [ECF No. 324]. The court found that because Plaintiffs began garnishment proceedings and obtained the writ before OFAC unblocked the Escrow Account, the garnishment was proper despite subsequent changes in the account's sanctions status. The court noted that a finding that the writ was proper does not determine ownership of the funds in the Escrow Account, which remains to be decided in Plaintiffs' pending Motion for Final Turnover Judgment.

Jamal Jackson v. Global Lending Services LLC — Court Affirms Arbitration Compulsion

On April 7, 2026, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida adopted Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss's Report and Recommendation, granting Defendant Global Lending Services, LLC's Motion to Dismiss and to Compel Arbitration and staying the case pending arbitration. The court overruled Plaintiff Jamal Jackson's objections to the Report, which had recommended dismissal based on an enforceable arbitration provision in the auto-loan Retail Installment Sales Contract. Jackson had alleged violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, Florida Consumer Collection Practices Act, and Truth in Lending Act, claiming the lender continued collection efforts and furnished inaccurate credit information after the loan was satisfied. The arbitration clause, governed by the Federal Arbitration Act, requires neutral binding arbitration for any dispute arising from the contract or credit relationship.

Alban v. Maduro Moros - Motion to Dismiss Interpleader Denied

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida adopted Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres's Report and Recommendation and denied the Alban Judgment Creditors' Motion to Dismiss JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s Counterclaim and Third-Party Complaint for Relief in Interpleader in Response to Writ of Garnishment on Blocked Account of Raytheon-DIANCA. The court applied clear error review because no party objected to the Magistrate's report, as provided under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The order was issued on April 7, 2026, in Miami, Florida.

WHISTLIN CREEK EST. 2025 Trademark Opposition - Southern Marsh Collection v. Elliott Coleman

Southern Marsh Collection, LLC filed an opposition against Elliott Coleman's WHISTLIN CREEK EST. 2025 trademark application before the USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. The opposition, designated TTAB91306875 and filed on April 24, 2026, challenges the registration of the WHISTLIN CREEK EST. 2025 mark. The TTAB opposition proceeding has been formally initiated and will determine whether the mark may proceed to registration.

THE CUB CLUB Opposition - Chicago Cubs v. So Fetch K9 Adventures

Chicago Cubs Baseball Club, LLC filed a trademark opposition proceeding against So Fetch K9 Adventures, LLC at the USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) on April 24, 2026. The opposition targets the service mark THE CUB CLUB filed by So Fetch K9 Adventures, LLC, with the Chicago Cubs alleging likelihood of confusion with their existing trademarks. This inter partes proceeding will determine whether the THE CUB CLUB mark can proceed to registration.

POKEMORY Opposition Default Notice, Nintendo v. Hui Sun

Nintendo of America Inc. filed TTAB Opposition No. 91305218 against Hui Sun's POKEMORY trademark application on February 13, 2026. The TTAB issued a Notice of Default on April 25, 2026, after the defendant failed to respond to the opposition. If the defendant does not respond, the TTAB may enter a default judgment, potentially resulting in refusal of the POKEMORY trademark application.

PROMPTJOCKEY Opposition: Jockey International v. Tector Sav

Jockey International, Inc. filed an opposition proceeding against Tector Sav's trademark application for PROMPTJOCKEY (Serial No. 97868964) on February 13, 2026. The USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board issued a Notice of Default on April 25, 2026, finding that the defendant failed to timely answer the notice of opposition. The defendant may petition to set aside the default within the time limit set forth in the notice; otherwise, judgment by default may be entered against Tector Sav and the opposition will proceed.

RAPID LABS Opposition: Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. v. Rapid Labs Limited

Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. filed an opposition against Rapid Labs Limited's RAPID LABS trademark application (TTAB Proceeding No. 91305201) on February 13, 2026. The TTAB issued a Notice of Default after Rapid Labs Limited failed to file an answer or otherwise respond to the opposition within the required timeframe. A Notice of Default is a procedural step that precedes entry of judgment against the defaulting party and does not itself determine the merits of the opposition.

Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and Institute v. Reagan Gold Group LLC - Trademark Opposition

Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and Institute filed Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Opposition No. TTAB91306878 on April 24, 2026, challenging the registration of REAGAN GOLD GROUP as a trademark by Reagan Gold Group, LLC. The opposition was accepted and filed with the required fee. The TTAB proceeding will determine whether the mark should proceed to registration or be refused based on likelihood of confusion or other grounds. Reagan Gold Group, LLC is required to respond to the opposition within the time periods set by TTAB rules.

Green Note Capital Partners v Dshalom Corp - TTAB Notice of Default

The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board issued a Notice of Default against defendant Dshalom Corp in opposition proceeding TTAB91305211, filed February 13, 2026, concerning the GREEN NOTE FUNDING trademark. Green Note Capital Partners, Inc. filed the opposition against Dshalom Corp's trademark application. The defendant faces potential default judgment for failure to respond to the opposition.

PRADA S.A. v. Jimfung Tsang - TTAB Opposition No. 91305210 Notice of Default

The USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board issued a Notice of Default in Opposition No. 91305210, filed by PRADA S.A. against registrant Jimfung Tsang concerning trademark application MIUTR. The opposition was filed on February 13, 2026, with the default notice issued on April 25, 2026. The TTAB proceeding remains pending with further action required from the defendant to avoid default judgment.

TTAB Notice of Default - Opposition YXY

Fuente Marketing Ltd. filed Opposition TTAB91305217 against SHENZHEN FUMOT TECHNOLOGY CO., LIMITED regarding trademark application YXY. The TTAB issued a Notice of Default on April 25, 2026, indicating the defendant failed to respond to the opposition. The opposition was filed February 13, 2026. A Notice of Default typically precedes a default judgment in trademark opposition proceedings, which could result in the applicant's mark being refused registration.

POKEPHYSIQUE Opposition by Nintendo, Default Issued Apr 25

The TTAB issued a Notice of Default in Opposition No. TTAB91305208 on April 25, 2026. The opposition was filed by Nintendo of America Inc. against Bill Vue's trademark application for POKEPHYSIQUE (filed February 13, 2026). The default was entered because the defendant failed to respond to the Notice of Default. As a result, the TTAB may proceed to enter judgment against the defendant and in favor of Nintendo, effectively preventing registration of the POKEPHYSIQUE mark.

PEARL RICE Opposition, El Carmen v NGON NGON, Default

The USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board issued a Notice of Default in Opposition No. TTAB91305205 filed by El Carmen, Inc. against applicant NGON NGON FOOD SUPPLY, INC concerning the PEARL RICE trademark. The defendant failed to respond to the opposition, triggering the default provision under TTAB rules. A default judgment means the TTAB treats the allegations in the complaint as admitted and may proceed to final judgment without further proceedings.

SSA Disability Denial Reversed, Remanded to Commissioner

The US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas reversed the Social Security Administration Commissioner's denial of benefits and remanded the case pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The plaintiff's unopposed motion for reversal and remand was granted. Under the Equal Access to Justice Act, the plaintiff may file an application for attorney's fees and costs within 30 days after the judgment becomes not appealable.

Falante et al v. Google LLC - Notice of Removal Filed

Google LLC filed a Notice of Removal on April 26, 2026, transferring case number 24CV434694 from Santa Clara County Superior Court to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The filing included a declaration and exhibits, with a filing fee of $405. Google LLC's corporate disclosure statement identified Alphabet Inc. and XXVI Holdings Inc. as corporate parents.

Disney et al v. Google LLC - Notice of Removal from Santa Clara County Superior Court

Disney et al filed a civil action against Google LLC in Santa Clara County Superior Court (Case No. 24CV434691), which Google removed to the Northern District of California on April 26, 2026. Google's notice of removal identifies the basis as federal question jurisdiction and was filed with a $405 filing fee (receipt number ACANDC-21911837). Google LLC also filed a corporate disclosure statement identifying Alphabet Inc. as its corporate parent and XXVI Holdings Inc. as the holding company of both entities.