Glen Howder v. Jeffrey Wehking - Habeas Petition Survives Rule 4 Review

Jump To

Top Caption Trial Court Document

Support FLP

CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.

Please become a member today.

Join Free.law Now

April 10, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note

Glen Howder v. Jeffrey Wehking, Warden of Centralia Correctional Center

District Court, S.D. Illinois

• Citations: None known
• Docket Number: 3:26-cv-00324

• Precedential Status: Unknown Status

• Opinion

• Authorities (1)

• Cited By (0)

• Summaries (0)

• Similar Cases (0)

• PDF

Trial Court Document

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

GLEN HOWDER, )
)
Petitioner, )
)
vs. ) Case No. 3:26-cv-324-DWD
)
JEFFREY WEHKING, Warden of )
Centralia Correctional Center, )
)
Respondent. )

MEMORANDUM & ORDER
DUGAN, District Judge:
Petitioner, through retained private counsel, filed a Petition for a Writ of Habeas
Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. 1). The Petition is now before the Court for a
preliminary review. Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the U.S. District
Courts provides: “If it plainly appears from the petition and any attached exhibits that
the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court, the judge must dismiss the
petition and direct the clerk to notify the petitioner.” See Rule 4 of the Rules Governing
Section 2254 Cases in the U.S. District Courts; accord Mayle v. Felix, 545 U.S. 644, 663 (2005).
Petitioner was convicted in the Circuit Court of Wabash County, Illinois, for
soliciting child pornography and aggravated criminal sexual abuse. (Doc. 1, pgs. 1, 3);
see also People v. Howder, No. 19-CF-29 (Cir. Ct. Wabash Co. 2019). He is serving an
aggregate term of 30 years in the IDOC (i.e., 20 years for soliciting child pornography and
two consecutive 5-year terms for aggravated criminal sexual abuse). (Doc. 1, pg. 3).
Petitioner directly appealed his conviction and sentence to the Illinois Appellate
Court, Fifth District, which unanimously affirmed the Circuit Court of Wabash County

on December 3, 2024. (Doc. 1, pg. 4); see also People v. Howder, 2024 IL App (5th) 220275 -
U. He then filed a Petition for Leave to Appeal that was denied by the Supreme Court of
Illinois. (Doc. 1, pg. 4); see also People v. Howder, 256 N.E.3d 970 (Table) (March 26, 2025).
Petitioner has not initiated collateral proceedings in the State of Illinois. (Doc. 1, pg. 6).
Now, Petitioner argues his conviction and sentence was unconstitutional in that it
violated clearly established federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the

United States. (Doc. 1, pg. 1). Specifically, Petitioner argues: (1) there was insufficient
evidence to sustain the child pornography conviction under the Due Process Clause of
the Fourteenth Amendment; (2) the Circuit Court of Wabash County failed to conduct a
statutorily mandated reliability hearing before admitting hearsay statements, which
violated Petitioner’s rights under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment;

(3) the Circuit Court of Wabash County erroneously admitted highly prejudicial other-
crimes evidence, which violated Petitioner’s right to a free and fair trial; and (4) the
cumulative errors deprived Petitioner of fundamental fairness. (Doc. 1, pgs. 1, 13-26).
Given the limited record and argument available at this time, it does not “plainly
appear[] from the petition” that Petitioner is entitled to no habeas relief. See Rule 4 of the

Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the U.S. District Courts; accord Mayle, 545 U.S. at
663. Accordingly, without commenting on the merits of Petitioner’s alleged grounds for
relief, the Court FINDS the Petition survives a Rule 4 preliminary review. Respondent is
DIRECTED to file an answer or other pleading within 30 days, i.e., on or before May 13,
2026. Petitioner then has until June 12, 2026, to file a Reply. This Memorandum & Order
does not preclude Respondent from raising any objection or defense to the Petition.

Service on the Illinois Attorney General, Criminal Appeals Bureau, 100 West Randolph,
12th Floor, Chicago, Illinois, 60601, shall constitute sufficient service upon Respondent.
Petitioner is ADVISED of the continuing obligation to keep the Clerk of the Court and
Respondent apprised of changes to his whereabouts. Petitioner shall notify the Clerk of
the Court and Respondent of any transfer or change of address, in writing, within 14
days. The failure to do so couldresult in a dismissalof the case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 10, 2026
s/ David W. Dugan

DAVID W. DUGAN
United States District Judge