SEC Proposes NYSE American LLC Rule Changes for Continued Listing Standards

The SEC is seeking public comment on proposed rule changes filed by NYSE American LLC to amend its Company Guide regarding continued listing standards. The proposed changes would increase the minimum closing price per share for immediate delisting from $0.10 to $0.25.

Nasdaq Texas Co-location Services Rule Change Proposal

Nasdaq Texas has proposed a rule change to expand its co-location services by introducing new cabinet offerings and power options in its future expansion area (NY11-5). The proposal aims to align the services available in the new area with those in existing expansion areas.

SEC Grants Conditional Exemptive Relief for Multi-Class ETFs

The SEC has granted conditional exemptive relief for multi-class ETFs, allowing them to offer both ETF shares and mutual fund shares within the same fund. This relief is based on previously granted orders and aims to address specific Exchange Act provisions for transactions involving ETF shares.

SEC Proposes Extension for Form F-10 Collection of Information

The SEC has submitted a request to the Office of Management and Budget for the extension of the information collection for Form F-10, used by certain Canadian foreign private issuers for securities offerings. The notice details the estimated burden hours and costs associated with the form.

NYSE Arca Rule Change for Equities Fees and Charges

NYSE Arca has filed a proposed rule change with the SEC to introduce the NYSE Arca Equity Membership On-Ramp Program. This program offers discounted fees for new Equity Permit Holders (ETPs) for up to 18 months, aiming to encourage smaller, retail-oriented market participants to join the exchange. The SEC is soliciting public comments on this proposal.

Nasdaq GEMX Proposes Rule Change for Co-location Services

Nasdaq GEMX has filed a proposed rule change with the SEC to expand its co-location services by introducing new cabinet offerings and power options in its future expansion area (NY11-5). The proposal aims to provide customers with the same cabinet and power services currently available in other data center areas.

SEC Seeks Comments on Exempt Preliminary Roll-Up Communication Collection

The SEC has submitted a request to the Office of Management and Budget for an extension of a previously approved collection of information regarding exempt preliminary roll-up communications. This notice seeks public comment on the information collection request, which is associated with Rule 14a-6(n).

SEC Registration Statement Form F-4 Information Collection Request

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has submitted a request to the Office of Management and Budget to extend the approval for the information collection requirements associated with Form F-4. This form is used by foreign issuers to register securities in business combinations, reorganizations, and exchange offers.

SEC Seeks Comments on Schedule 14D-1F Tender Offer Statement

The SEC has submitted a request to the Office of Management and Budget for an extension of the approval for Schedule 14D-1F. This form facilitates cross-border tender offers for Canadian issuers where U.S. holders own less than 40% of the target's securities. The notice seeks public comment on the information collection request.

FAA Renames Restricted Areas R-2103A, R-2103B, R-2103C at Fort Novosel, AL

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is renaming three restricted areas at Fort Novosel, Alabama. These changes affect restricted areas R-2103A, R-2103B, and R-2103C. The rule is effective July 9, 2026.

CBSA Preliminary Determinations: Truck Bodies from China

The Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) made preliminary determinations on March 6, 2026, regarding the dumping and subsidizing of truck bodies originating in or exported from China. Provisional duties have been imposed on affected imports.

Agency Information Collection Activities: NCCC Project Sponsor Survey

The Corporation for National and Community Service (AmeriCorps) has submitted a revised information collection request for the NCCC Project Sponsor Survey for OMB review. The proposed changes aim to reduce burden by eliminating questions and altering reporting requirements for financial contributions. No public comments were received during the prior notice period.

CFPB - Mortgage Advertising Regulation N Comment Request

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) is requesting the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) reinstatement of an information collection titled 'Mortgage Acts and Practices—Advertising (Regulation N)'. This notice seeks public comment on the necessity, utility, accuracy, and burden of the collection, which requires mortgage lenders to retain advertising records for 24 months.

CFPB Seeks Comments on Interstate Land Sales Act Regulations

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) is requesting comments on the reinstatement of an information collection related to the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act (ILSA). This includes Regulations J, K, and L, which require land developers to register subdivisions and provide property reports to purchasers.

NHTSA Seeks Comment on Data Collection for Crash, Surveillance, and Studies

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is seeking public comment on its request to extend and modify an existing information collection for its Crash Report Sampling System (CRSS), Non-Traffic Surveillance (NTS), and Special Study Data Collection. This notice initiates a 60-day comment period as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act.

NHTSA Seeks Comments on Event Data Recorder Collection Reinstatement

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is requesting comments on the reinstatement of a previously approved information collection regarding Event Data Recorders (EDRs). This notice is part of the Paperwork Reduction Act process, seeking public input on the necessity and burden of collecting EDR data.

NHTSA Consolidated Labeling Requirements for Theft Prevention Standard

NHTSA is seeking public comments on its intention to request approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to reinstate a previously approved information collection regarding consolidated labeling requirements for Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Standards. The comment period closes on May 19, 2026.

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters

The Federal Aviation Administration has issued a proposed rule regarding airworthiness directives for Airbus Helicopters. This proposal is open for public comment until May 7, 2026.

Airworthiness Directives; Baykar Piaggio Aerospace Airplanes

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is issuing an airworthiness directive for Baykar Piaggio Aerospace S.p.A. airplanes. This rule mandates specific actions to address unsafe conditions on these aircraft, ensuring continued airworthiness.

Renaming Restricted Areas R-3002A through R-3002G at Fort Moore, GA

The Federal Aviation Administration is renaming restricted airspace areas R-3002A through R-3002G at Fort Moore, Georgia. This rule is a renaming of existing restricted areas and does not alter their boundaries or operational status.

Amendment of Restricted Area R-5201 at Fort Drum, NY

The Federal Aviation Administration is amending restricted airspace R-5201 at Fort Drum, New York. This rule modifies the boundaries and altitudes of the restricted area to enhance safety and operational control.

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

The Federal Aviation Administration has issued a proposed rule regarding airworthiness directives for The Boeing Company airplanes. This proposal is open for public comment until May 7, 2026.

FAA - UAS Integration at Airports Information Collection Comments

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has issued a notice requesting comments on a new information collection activity related to Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) integration at airports. The comment period is open until April 22, 2026.

FAA Seeks Comments on Renewed Approval for Human Space Flight Requirements

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is seeking public comments on its intention to renew an existing information collection regarding human space flight requirements for crew and space flight participants. This collection is mandatory and ensures compliance with safety criteria established by the Commercial Space Launch Amendments Act of 2004.

FAA Employment Application Collection Comments Requested

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is requesting public comments on the renewal of an existing information collection regarding its employment application process. This notice is part of the standard clearance process for government information collections.

FDA Variance Application from Epic Pro Event Production

The FDA has posted a variance application from Epic Pro Event Production. The document is available for review on Regulations.gov, though no specific details or full text are provided in the initial listing.

Raven Robert Rodriguez v. State of Texas - Murder Conviction Affirmed

The Texas Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Raven Robert Rodriguez for capital murder. The court addressed two issues raised by the appellant concerning the trial court's jury charge and the admission of extraneous offense evidence. The disposition was affirmed, upholding the life imprisonment sentence.

Brayden Scott Roupp v. the State of Texas - Murder Case Dismissal

The Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District, has dismissed the murder case against Brayden Scott Roupp. The appellant, through his attorney, filed a motion to withdraw his appeal, stating he did not wish to pursue it further. The court granted this motion.

Interest of T.M. Child v. State of Texas - Termination of Parental Rights

The Texas Court of Appeals has issued a memorandum opinion in the case of In the Interest of T.M., a Child v. the State of Texas. The court affirmed in part and reversed and remanded in part the trial court's order terminating the parental rights of the mother. The appeal challenged the sufficiency of evidence regarding endangerment, best interest of the child, and reasonable efforts by the Department of Family and Protective Services.

Estate of Teddy Jack Wright v. State of Texas - Probate Case Affirmed

The Texas Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision to admit a 2019 will to probate. The appeal concerned the district court's jurisdiction and the validity of the will, which excluded one of the decedent's children.

Ernest Villa Marquez v. State of Texas - DWI Case Affirmed

The Texas Court of Appeals affirmed a DWI conviction for Ernest Villa Marquez. The jury found Marquez guilty of a third-degree felony offense and sentenced him to thirty-seven years imprisonment. The appellate court found the evidence sufficient to support the conviction.

SAU Report on British Business Bank Subsidy Assessment

The UK's Subsidy Advice Unit (SAU) has published its independent report advising the Department for Business and Trade (DBT) on a proposed subsidy to the British Business Bank (BBB). The report evaluates DBT's assessment of the scheme's compliance with the Subsidy Control Act 2022.

County of Sacramento v. NKS Real Estate Holdings - Civil Litigation

The California Supreme Court has issued an opinion in the case of County of Sacramento v. NKS Real Estate Holdings, Inc., et al. The case was filed on December 5, 2023, and involves civil litigation related to real estate holdings. The opinion is now available for citation.

Unlawful Detainer Appeal: Plaintiff Wins on Notice and Civil Code 1962 Compliance

The California Supreme Court clarified that a tenant bears the burden of proof for a landlord's noncompliance with Civil Code section 1962 notice obligations in unlawful detainer actions. The court affirmed a judgment for the plaintiff, finding the defendant failed to prove the landlord's noncompliance with disclosure requirements.

City of Riverside v. RLI Insurance Company - Case Information

The California Supreme Court has provided case information for City of Riverside v. RLI Insurance Company. The filing date for this case was December 20, 2024. This entry serves as a notification of ongoing judicial proceedings.

People v. Taft - Criminal Case

The California Supreme Court has docketed a new criminal case, People v. Taft, with case number B339775. The filing date was May 29, 2024, and oral arguments are scheduled for February 9, 2026. This entry pertains to a new case being added to the court's docket.

The People v. Perez - Criminal Case

The California Supreme Court has issued case details for The People v. Perez, case number G064219. The filing date for this criminal case was May 24, 2024. This entry provides procedural information and links to related documents.

Gambrill v NG Bailey Facilities Services Ltd - Personal Injury Claim

The High Court of Justice has issued a judgment in the case of Gambrill v NG Bailey Facilities Services Ltd. This litigation concerns additional claims brought by the defendant against a third party following a settlement in the underlying personal injury claim. The court is considering applications related to contribution claims under the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978.

Lynch v Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust - Medical Malpractice

The High Court of Justice, King's Bench Division, has issued a judgment in the case of Lynch v Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust. The judgment, handed down on March 20, 2026, concerns a claim brought by Daisy Lynch against the NHS Trust. The case involved extensive evidence, including factual and expert testimony.

Sousou Connect Ltd v Abel - Commercial Court Case

The High Court of Justice Commercial Court has issued a judgment in the case of Sousou Connect Ltd v Abel. The case involves a dispute arising from dealings between the claimant, a company offering capital introduction services, and the defendant, an individual involved in setting up a real estate investment fund. The claimant alleges an oral agreement was made for introduction services.

Solomon v Spence - Gambling Act 2005 Interpretation

The High Court of Justice has issued a judgment in Solomon v Spence, concerning unlicensed betting activities and interpretation of the Gambling Act 2005. The case involves alleged debts arising from betting between two retired businessmen over several years, raising questions of statutory and common law illegality.

Woolfson v Woolfson & Ors - High Court Chancery Division Case

The High Court of Justice, Chancery Division, has issued a judgment in the case of Woolfson v Woolfson & Ors. The proceedings, initiated by Karen Woolfson, concern testamentary dispositions and assets related to her mother's estate. The case involves multiple defendants and was heard on January 26, 2026.

Khosa v Ganesarayan - Property Dispute Appeal

The High Court of Justice heard an appeal from a county court decision regarding a property dispute at 101 Whitton Road, Twickenham. The appeal concerns the interpretation of a 1998 transfer document and easements related to a property extension. The judgment was handed down on March 20, 2026.

Laboratorios Leon Farma SA v Comptroller-General of Patents - SPC Regulation Appeal

The High Court of Justice (Patents Court) heard an appeal concerning the interpretation of Article 3 of the SPC Regulation (assimilated EU law) regarding supplementary protection certificates for pharmaceutical products. The case specifically addresses the definition of the "product" authorised by a marketing authorisation, focusing on an oral contraceptive containing drospirenone.

BHO v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care - NHS Charging Regulations

The High Court of Justice is hearing a case where the claimant alleges that the NHS Charging Regulations 2015, as amended, breach the Withdrawal Agreement. The claimant argues that the regulations unfairly charge individuals who obtained residence status late but had reasonable grounds for the delay, for medical treatment received between their application deadline and acceptance date. A related guidance document is also under scrutiny.

GSX v Crown Court at Southwark - Judicial Review of Search Warrant

The High Court of Justice (Administrative Court) has ruled on a judicial review concerning a search warrant issued by the Crown Court at Southwark, applied for by the Metropolitan Police on behalf of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). The court acknowledged that the warrant, entry, search, and seizures were unlawful. The primary dispute is whether to grant additional relief beyond quashing the warrant, specifically regarding the return of seized items and the use of obtained material.

Greyhound Board v Welsh Ministers - Judicial Review of Greyhound Racing Ban Statement

The High Court of Justice in England and Wales has issued a judgment in a judicial review case brought by the Greyhound Board of Great Britain against the Welsh Ministers. The case challenges a statement made by the Deputy First Minister of Wales expressing an intention to ban greyhound racing in Wales and the subsequent legislative process. The judgment addresses the claimant's argument regarding an alleged unlawful failure to consult.

R v Brown - Appeal Against Conviction

The Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) heard a renewed application for an extension of time and leave to appeal against conviction in the case of R v Michael Stephen Brown. The applicant, who pleaded guilty in 2014 to child cruelty and assault, is seeking to appeal his conviction after a delay of approximately 10 years. The court also issued a reporting restriction order to protect the identity of complainants under 18.

R. v EGC - Appeal Against Conviction for Sexual Offending

The Court of Appeal Criminal Division is hearing an application for leave to appeal against a conviction for sexual offending. The case involves the historical legal principle of doli incapax, which presumed children aged 10-14 were incapable of committing a crime before its abolition in 1998. Reporting restrictions are in place.

Mohammed R v Riaz Mohammed - Criminal Appeal

The Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) heard an appeal by Riaz Mohammed against his conviction for conspiring to supply Class A drugs. The appeal focuses on the judge's response to a jury question regarding a copy of the defence closing speech, with the appellant arguing the convictions may be unsafe. The court is reviewing the trial judge's handling of jury deliberations.