Brayden Scott Roupp v. the State of Texas - Murder Case Dismissal
Summary
The Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District, has dismissed the murder case against Brayden Scott Roupp. The appellant, through his attorney, filed a motion to withdraw his appeal, stating he did not wish to pursue it further. The court granted this motion.
What changed
The Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland), has dismissed the murder case against Brayden Scott Roupp (Docket No. 11-25-00285-CR). The appellant was convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. However, the appellant subsequently filed a motion to withdraw his appeal, indicating he did not desire to pursue it further and understood the implications of this decision.
This action results in the dismissal of the appeal. For legal professionals involved in appellate procedures, this case serves as an example of how a defendant can voluntarily withdraw their appeal. There are no immediate compliance actions required for regulated entities, as this is a specific case disposition rather than a new rule or guidance.
Source document (simplified)
Jump To
Top Caption Disposition Lead Opinion
Support FLP
CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.
Please become a member today.
March 19, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note
Brayden Scott Roupp v. the State of Texas
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)
- Citations: None known
- Docket Number: 11-25-00285-CR
- Nature of Suit: Murder
Disposition: Dismissed
Disposition
Dismissed
Lead Opinion
Opinion filed March 19, 2026
In The
Eleventh Court of Appeals
No. 11-25-00285-CR
BRAYDEN SCOTT ROUPP, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 70th District Court
Ector County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. A241142CR
MEMORANDUM OPINION
A jury convicted Appellant, Brayden Scott Roupp, of the first-degree felony
offense of murder and assessed his punishment at life imprisonment in the Texas
Department of Criminal Justice. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 19.02(b), (c) (West
Supp 2025). The trial court sentenced him accordingly. Appellant filed a notice of
appeal from the trial court’s judgment.
Appellant has now filed a motion to “[w]ithdraw” his appeal. In the motion,
Appellant states that he “does not desire to appeal the verdict of guilt or the
sentencing by the jury.” He states that his attorney “has advised [him] that once he
withdraws his right to appeal, he will no longer have the opportunity to do so[,] and
in full understanding, [Appellant] does desire to [w]ithdraw his [a]ppeal.”
We construe Appellant’s motion as a request to dismiss his appeal. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 42.2(a). The motion is signed by Appellant and Appellant’s attorney in
compliance with Rule 42.2(a). Id.
We grant Appellant’s motion and dismiss this appeal.
W. STACY TROTTER
JUSTICE
March 19, 2026
Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,
Trotter, J., and Williams, J.
2
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get Courts & Legal alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when Texas Court of Appeals publishes new changes.