Changeflow GovPing

What do you monitor?

Curated feeds for your role. Pick your area and get exactly the sources you need.

Recent changes

Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

United States v. Luis Raul Vicente Fonseca - Criminal Appeal

The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has issued a non-precedential opinion in the criminal case United States v. Luis Raul Vicente Fonseca. The case involves a docket number of 25-12777 and was filed on March 20, 2026. No known citations are associated with this opinion.

Routine Enforcement Criminal Justice
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

United States v. Joseph Ambrose Wilburn, Jr. - Criminal Appeal

The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction and sentence of Joseph Ambrose Wilburn, Jr. The court granted the appointed counsel's motion to withdraw, finding no arguable issues of merit in the appeal after an independent review of the record. This decision follows the 'Non-Argument Calendar' procedure.

Routine Enforcement Criminal Justice
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Daniel Stermer v. Federated Foundation Trust - Court Opinion

The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued a non-precedential opinion in the case of Daniel Stermer v. Federated Foundation Trust. The court affirmed a lower court's decision regarding a real estate auction process for a condominium association. The ruling addresses a bidder's failure to meet qualification requirements for an auction.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

United States v. Rene Bravo - Supervised Release Conditions Appeal

The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals is reviewing a defendant's appeal regarding the imposition of supervised release conditions. The defendant argues that the conditions, including full-time employment, polygraph testing, and no direct contact with minors, are substantively unreasonable and arbitrary as imposed by the district court.

Priority review Enforcement Criminal Justice
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

US v. Fritz Lafontante - Sentence Reduction Appeal

The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial of Fritz Lafontante's motion for compassionate release. The court found that Lafontante did not demonstrate extraordinary and compelling reasons for release, nor did he prove that the Section 3553(a) factors weighed in his favor or that he did not pose a danger to the community.

Routine Enforcement Criminal Justice
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Alice Bruce v. U.S. Bank National Association - Court Opinion

The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the dismissal of Alice and Roy Bruce's lawsuit against U.S. Bank National Association. The appellate court found that the district court erred in dismissing the case for lack of jurisdiction, remanding it for further proceedings.

Priority review Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

O'Loughlin v. AESA Enterprises - Court Opinion

The Utah Court of Appeals filed an opinion in the case of O'Loughlin v. AESA Enterprises on March 19, 2026. The court affirmed the district court's grant of a motion in limine to exclude damages evidence, leading to the dismissal of the case. The court also addressed attorney fees awards.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Old Republic National Title v. Cap Fund 783 - Real Estate Escrow Dispute

The Utah Court of Appeals reviewed a dispute over escrowed real estate funds. The court reversed summary judgment for the escrow agent, Old Republic National Title Insurance Company, on interpleader immunity grounds and vacated the award of attorney fees related to those claims. The court also reversed summary judgment on a tortious interference claim.

Priority review Enforcement Real Estate
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

State v. Beltran-Perez - Criminal Double Jeopardy Appeal

The Utah Court of Appeals affirmed a conviction for robbery, ruling that the defendant's plea agreement in a federal case did not violate statutory double jeopardy principles. The court found that the state and federal charges stemmed from distinct criminal acts.

Priority review Enforcement Criminal Justice
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

State v. Hart - Utah Court of Appeals Opinion

The Utah Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions of Steven Wallace Hart for dealing in material harmful to a minor. The court rejected Hart's argument that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to move for dismissal earlier, finding the statute of limitations did not bar the charges.

Routine Enforcement Criminal Justice

Showing 13911–13920 of 32,283 changes

1 1390 1391 1392 1393 1394 3229

Get alerts when regulations change

Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.