Legal Research

NC AG Urges Businesses to Apply for IEEPA Tariff Refunds via CBP CAPE Portal

Attorney General Jeff Jackson urges North Carolina businesses impacted by IEEPA tariffs struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court in February 2026 to apply for refunds through the new CBP Consolidated Administration and Processing of Entries (CAPE) platform. Only importers of record and licensed customs brokers can apply through the ACE Secure Data Portal. Refunds including interest are expected within 60-90 days of declaration acceptance. Nationally, IEEPA tariffs cost businesses and consumers more than $166 billion; North Carolina businesses and families bore approximately $3.5 billion of that burden. The AG has also called on Congress to pass legislation for automatic reimbursement and filed a lawsuit blocking the latest round of unlawful tariffs.

NC AG Jeff Jackson Wins MV Realty Case, Saves North Carolina Homeowners $18 Million; Company Permanently Banned from State

Attorney General Jeff Jackson obtained consent judgments voiding approximately 2,000 Homeowner Benefit Agreements entered into by more than 2,100 North Carolina homeowners with MV Realty, permanently banning the company from doing business in the state, and requiring the company to pay more than $1.32 million in restitution to consumers. Individuals associated with the company are prohibited for 10 years from engaging in consumer financial products, residential real estate, telemarketing, and robocalling businesses. If defendants violate the terms of their judgments, they may be required to pay an additional $5.7 million in penalties.

Case 24-1349

This document is a PACER docket entry page for US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit case 24-1349. The entry contains no substantive information about the case, parties, ruling, or docket activity. The page directs users to the PACER service center or www.pacer.gov for further information.

Notice of Default Issued in AOCOO Trademark Opposition TTAB91305241

The TTAB issued a Notice of Default in Opposition No. TTAB91305241 filed by Top Victory Investments Limited against KSL Rockstar LLC concerning the trademark AOCOO. The opposition was filed on February 14, 2026. A Notice of Default in TTAB proceedings is entered against a defendant who has failed to respond to the complaint, and the TTAB may then proceed to enter judgment against the defaulting party.

REAL BAMBOO Opposition: Panda Life Ltd v Reed Larsen

USPTO TTAB Opposition TTAB91306502 was filed on April 9, 2026, with Panda Life Ltd. as plaintiff opposing defendant Reed Larsen's REAL BAMBOO trademark application. The opposition is currently suspended, indicating a procedural hold on the proceeding. Trademark applicants and their competitors should monitor this case for updates, as suspension may result from settlement negotiations, related civil litigation, or pending motions.

Seaside Community Development Corporation v. Pixeldust Creative Inc. - TTAB Opposition Default

Opposition TTAB91305243 was filed on 2026-02-14 by Seaside Community Development Corporation against Pixeldust Creative, Inc., targeting registration of the trademark SEASIDE PLEASURE HOUSE. The TTAB has now issued a Notice of Default, signaling that the Board is prepared to enter judgment against the defendant for failure to respond. This procedural milestone indicates that Pixeldust Creative, Inc. may lose its ability to contest the opposition and obtain registration of the mark.

ENODA Opposition Dismissed, NEOM Company Loses

The TTAB issued a final decision dismissing Opposition No. 91299507 with prejudice, ruling against NEOM Company and in favor of Enoda Ltd regarding the ENODA trademark. The opposition, filed June 6, 2025, alleged likelihood of confusion or other grounds but failed to sustain the burden of proof. Enoda Ltd may proceed with registration of the ENODA mark; NEOM Company is barred from refiling on the same grounds.

MYMEDONE Opposition Dismissed Without Prejudice - Med One Capital Funding LLC v MedOne LC

The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board dismissed Opposition No. 91299302 filed by Med One Capital Funding, LLC against MedOne, L.C.'s MYMEDONE trademark application. The opposition was dismissed without prejudice, meaning the plaintiff may potentially refile or pursue other remedies. The MYMEDONE mark remains in contention. The proceeding was filed on May 28, 2025, and the Board's decision issued on April 26, 2026.

FLEXCLOUD Opposition TTAB91301201 - NetApp vs Flexnode

NetApp, Inc. filed an opposition proceeding against Flexnode Inc. seeking to prevent registration of the FLEXCLOUD trademark. The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board dismissed the opposition without prejudice on April 26, 2026. The case was originally filed on August 22, 2025.

FTF LIVE Extension - The Financial Times Limited v. PIXOVER YAZILIM INSAAT TURIZM

The Financial Times Limited has filed an additional 60-day request to extend the time to oppose trademark application FTF LIVE filed by defendant PIXOVER YAZILIM INSAAT TURIZM. The extension request was filed under TTAB proceeding number TTAB79420902 on April 26, 2026, with an original filing date of January 14, 2026. This procedural filing extends the opposition period but does not constitute a final determination on the merits of the trademark dispute.

Ex Parte Appeal #79404880, Sponser Sport Food AG

An ex parte appeal was filed by Sponser Sport Food AG with the USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) on April 26, 2026 under case number 79404880. The document serves as a procedural filing record indicating the initiation of an appeal to the Board. No substantive decision, ruling, or determination has been recorded in this filing entry.

Opposition Sustained, NATUREBLISS, Nestlé vs Shenzhen

The TTAB sustained opposition TTAB91303200 filed by Société des Produits Nestlé S.A. against Shenzhen Xiyuxiangqing Agricultural Products Co., Ltd., preventing registration of the trademark NATUREBLISS. The opposition was filed on November 19, 2025, and decided on April 24, 2026. Nestlé successfully demonstrated likelihood of confusion with its existing marks, blocking the Shenzhen company's attempt to register the contested mark for agricultural products.

Perplexity AI Files Extension on PERPLEX.COM Trademark Opposition

Perplexity AI, Inc. filed a first 30-day request to extend the time to oppose trademark application PERPLEX.COM, with Search.com, LLC as the defendant. The extension was filed with the USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board on April 24, 2026. This is a procedural step in trademark opposition proceedings that does not constitute a final determination on the merits of any trademark claim.

TTAB Grants Trayport Limited 60-Day Extension to Oppose SAP JOULE Mark

The USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board granted Trayport Limited an additional 60-day extension of time to file a notice of opposition against SAP SE's trademark application for "SAP JOULE." The extension was granted on April 26, 2026, pushing the opposition deadline further out. The original filing date for the opposition proceeding was January 2, 2026.

JOULE Extension, Trayport vs SAP, 60-Day

Trayport Limited has filed a 60-day extension request to extend the time to oppose SAP SE's JOULE trademark in TTAB Proceeding No. 79405872. The extension filing date is January 2, 2026, and the document was processed on April 26, 2026. This is a routine procedural step in the trademark opposition process and does not represent a substantive ruling on the merits of the opposition.

Wermager Beach Utility v. MPCA — Sewage System Permit Requirement Affirmed

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed an MPCA administrative order requiring Wermager Beach Utility Company to apply for and obtain an NPDES/SDS permit for the continued operation of its pond-based sewage system serving 37 homes on Big Cormorant Lake in Lake Park, Minnesota. The court rejected Wermager's argument that requiring a permit was a retroactive application of Minnesota Statutes section 115.07, finding instead that the order does not penalize past conduct but regulates ongoing operation of a disposal system. The court further held that the issue of Wermager's compliance with the order is premature and not properly before the court, as the MPCA has not yet determined compliance or initiated enforcement proceedings.

Dixon v. Comcast Motion Denied, Arbitration Award Affirmed

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's confirmation of an arbitration award in favor of Comcast Corp., rejecting appellant Joseph Dixon's arguments that no valid contract existed and that the arbitration process was biased. The court held that the record supported the district court's finding that Dixon accepted Comcast's contracts by using cell phones and internet service, thereby binding him to the arbitration agreement. The appellate court also denied Dixon's motion to strike as moot and affirmed the denial of his motion for summary judgment, concluding Comcast timely responded to filings.

UniCredit Bank GmbH v RusChemAlliance LLC — Anti-Suit Injunction and Arbitration Agreement Jurisdiction

The UK Supreme Court (UKSC/2024/0015) issued its judgment on 18 September 2024 in the case of UniCredit Bank GmbH v RusChemAlliance LLC, resolving questions of international jurisdiction and governing law for anti-suit injunctions in the context of bonds governed by English law but providing for ICC arbitration seated in Paris. The judgment determines whether English courts are the proper forum for an anti-suit injunction restraining Russian proceedings brought by a Russian company, and whether the arbitration agreements are governed by French or English law.

SGL 1 Limited v FSV Freeholders - Permission to Appeal Application

The UK Supreme Court has received a permission to appeal application from FSV Freeholders Limited in case UKSC/2026/0052 against respondent SGL 1 Limited. The application was issued on 27 April 2026 and the case originated from the Property Tribunal/Appeals jurisdiction. The Court is accepting email sign-ups for updates on this matter.

Hornbeck Home Renovations, Inc. v. Crain — Appeal Dismissed; No Final Order

The Ohio Eleventh District Court of Appeals dismissed defendant Thomas Crain's appeal on April 27, 2026, holding the trial court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction because no final order was entered. The trial court adopted the magistrate's decision awarding monetary damages to Hornbeck Home Renovations, Inc. but failed to enter a separate judgment stating the relief. The appellate court held that only trial court judges, not magistrates, may terminate claims by entering judgment.

H&S Investment Properties LLC v. Yamamoto — Mandamus Petition Dismissed Over Tax List Name Update

The Ohio Court of Appeals, Eleventh District, dismissed a writ of mandamus petition filed by H&S Investment Properties LLC against Ashtabula County Auditor Scott Yamamoto. The relator sought to compel the auditor to update the county tax list to reflect the company's legal name change from Damon Harris Properties LLC to H&S Investment Properties LLC. The court granted the auditor's motion to dismiss, finding that neither R.C. 5301.252 (Affidavit of Fact Relating to Title) nor R.C. 319.28 (county auditor's tax list duties) creates a clear legal right or duty requiring an auditor to update tax lists based on a name-change affidavit. The relator's motion for summary judgment was overruled as moot.

Boise Cascade Fined $6.38M for Lacey Act Violation, Timber Trafficking Scheme

Boise Cascade Company pleaded guilty and was sentenced to pay a fine of $6,382,000 (representing twice the gross profits from the illegal wood) and must implement a compliance plan after being convicted of a felony Lacey Act violation for knowingly purchasing illegally imported hardwood plywood from China totaling more than $30 million during 2018-2021. The scheme involved transshipping products through Malaysia to evade U.S. countervailing and anti-dumping duties, and the court found Boise Cascade continued placing orders even after a federal search warrant was executed at the supplier's warehouse in January 2021. Companies importing or purchasing timber and wood products should strengthen supply-chain due diligence, as the DOJ's Trade Fraud Task Force is actively prosecuting both sellers and buyers in duty evasion schemes under the Lacey Act.

Berentis et al v. Google LLC - Notice of Removal

Civil case Berentis et al v. Google LLC was filed in the Northern District of California on April 27, 2026 under case number 4:26-cv-03599. Google LLC filed a Notice of Removal from Santa Clara County Superior Court, where the original case was numbered 24CV434866, with a filing fee of $405. The case is classified as a Federal Question civil action based on Other Statutory Actions. Google also filed a Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying XXVI Holdings Inc. and Alphabet Inc. as corporate parents.

H.R. 6431 - New Opportunities for Business Ownership and Self-Sufficiency Act Amendment

H.R. 6431 proposes to expand the Self-Employment Assistance (SEA) program by eliminating the requirement that participants be eligible for or exhausted regular unemployment insurance benefits. The bill would broaden approved self-employment activities to include business plans and market feasibility studies submitted by individuals and approved by the state, while mandating weekly certification of such activities. Additionally, the measure raises the cap on the number of individuals participating in SEA programs from 5 to 10.

Passport Revocation for Child Support Arrearages Over $2,500

The Ensuring Children Receive Support Act, H.R. 6903, would amend Section 452(k) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 652(k)) to authorize the revocation of passports for individuals with unpaid child support arrearages exceeding $2,500. The bill strikes the language allowing restriction or limitation of passports, replacing it with a direct revocation authority, and requires notification to individuals of the intent to take such action. An emergency exception permits the Department of State to issue temporary passports limited to return travel for individuals abroad who need to return to the United States on an emergency basis. The amendments would take effect on October 1, 2026.

Amendment to H.R. 5366 - Doug LaMalfa Federal Disaster Tax Relief Certainty Act

Representative Smith of Missouri introduced an amendment in the nature of a substitute to H.R. 5366, proposing the 'Doug LaMalfa Federal Disaster Tax Relief Certainty Act,' which would amend the Internal Revenue Code to provide special rules for casualty losses in qualified disaster areas and exclude from gross income compensation received for losses from certain wildfires. The amendment would raise the casualty loss deduction floor to $100 (from $500) for qualified disaster-related losses and create new Section 139M excluding qualified wildfire relief payments from taxable income. The bill would apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2024, and to payments received in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025, covering disasters with incident periods from December 28, 2019 through January 1, 2027.