Changeflow GovPing Courts & Legal UK Supreme Court Decisions
Favicon for supremecourt.uk

UK Supreme Court Decisions

RSS

GovPing monitors UK Supreme Court Decisions for new courts & legal regulatory changes. Every update since tracking began is archived, classified, and available as free RSS or email alerts — 3 changes logged to date.

Thursday, April 23, 2026

Favicon for supremecourt.uk

Zaha Hadid Foundation v Zaha Hadid Limited - Permission to Appeal Application

The UK Supreme Court has registered a permission to appeal application in case UKSC/2026/0051, with The Zaha Hadid Foundation as the appellant and Zaha Hadid Limited as the respondent. The application was lodged on 22 April 2026 and the case originated from the PTA court. This entry reflects the initial case registration stage; no substantive ruling or decision has been issued.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for supremecourt.uk

HMRC v Fisher - Section 739 Income Tax Attribution: Individual as Transferor

The UK Supreme Court in HMRC v Fisher (UKSC/2021/0212, [2023] UKSC 44) has clarified the interpretation of section 739 of the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 concerning offshore income attribution. The Court held that for section 739 to apply, the individual who has the power to enjoy the income must generally be the transferor of the assets; however, an individual may be treated as a transferor where the company making the transfer is one in which that individual has a controlling interest in the relevant shareholding. The appeal by Stephen and Peter Fisher and the cross-appeal by HMRC regarding Anne Fisher were heard over two days in July 2023 before the five-justice panel.

Priority review Enforcement Taxation
Favicon for supremecourt.uk

Gatwick Investment Ltd v Liberty Mutual - Business Interruption Insurance and CJRS Deduction

The UK Supreme Court (Lord Reed, Lord Briggs, Lord Hamblen, Lord Leggatt, Lord Burrows) ruled on 22 April 2026 that Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS) payments received by employers must be taken into account (credited) when calculating amounts payable under 'savings clauses' in business interruption insurance policies. The Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeal's decision, which had upheld the position that CJRS payments should not be deducted. The case concerned whether CJRS wage-reimbursement payments fall within policy provisions that reduce payouts when the policyholder's charges or expenses cease or reduce as a consequence of damage. Hotels and racecourse operators who claimed business interruption losses after Covid-19 and received CJRS funds will now face adjusted insurance settlements.

Priority review Enforcement Insurance

Get daily alerts for UK Supreme Court Decisions

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Source details

Category
Courts & Legal
Country
United Kingdom

Activity

Changes tracked
3
Changes in last month
3
Last change detected
4h ago

Filters

Get UK Supreme Court Decisions alerts

We'll email you when UK Supreme Court Decisions publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!