United States — March 3, 2026

Gray Media v. Comanche County Facilities Authority - Open Records Act Appeal

The Supreme Court of Oklahoma is reviewing an appeal concerning whether a detention center managed by a public trust qualifies as a "law enforcement agency" under the Oklahoma Open Records Act. The case involves a media group's request for video footage.

In re M.D. - Juvenile Court Law Appeal

The California Court of Appeal filed an opinion in the case of In re M.D., concerning a juvenile wardship based on forcible oral copulation. The appellant argued insufficient evidence and a potential defense, but the court affirmed the lower court's order. This non-precedential opinion addresses juvenile justice and criminal law.

People v. Lopez - Resentencing Petition Denial

The California Court of Appeal affirmed the denial of a petition for resentencing under Penal Code section 1172.6. The court found the defendant ineligible for resentencing as a matter of law based on the record of conviction.

People v. Candler - California Court of Appeal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court's denial of Mark Anthony Candler's petition for resentencing under Penal Code section 1172.6. The court found Candler ineligible for relief as a matter of law, upholding his conviction for attempted murder and associated enhancements.

California Highway Patrol v. Diaz - Employment Dispute

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court's decision to reduce a California Highway Patrol officer's termination to a one-year suspension for falsely claiming overtime. The court found the State Personnel Board did not abuse its discretion in modifying the penalty.

People v. Godoy - Criminal Sentencing Appeal

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court's decision not to recall and resentence Augustine Brady Godoy. The court reviewed the case under People v. Delgadillo and found no arguable issues, upholding the original sentence for second-degree murder.

People v. Rios - California Court of Appeal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two, issued a non-precedential opinion in the case of People v. Rios. The court affirmed the trial court's decision to deny the defendant's petition for resentencing under Penal Code section 1172.6.

Rahman v. Ayoubi - Appeal of Anti-SLAPP Motion Denial

The California Court of Appeal affirmed the denial of an anti-SLAPP motion in Rahman v. Ayoubi. The court found sufficient evidence that the respondent had a probability of prevailing on the merits of his claim, despite a potential misapplication of a legal rule by the trial court. The case involves an appeal from an order denying a special motion to strike.

Piltan v. Novell - Appeal Dismissed

The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Eight, filed an opinion in Piltan v. Novell on March 2, 2026. The court dismissed the appeal as premature due to a pending cross-complaint, citing California Rules of Court.

Brown v. Hall CA3 - Non-Precedential Opinion Affirming Trial Court

The California Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, filed a non-precedential opinion in Brown v. Hall, affirming trial court decisions. The court found the appellant's briefs deficient and rejected pleas for relief, citing non-compliance with court rules.

People v. Martinez - Criminal Appeal

The California Court of Appeal modified a judgment in the case of People v. Martinez. The court struck a parole revocation restitution fine and corrected fee assessments, while otherwise affirming the conviction for murder and burglary with enhancements.

People v. Vessels - Criminal Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, filed an opinion in the case of People v. Vessels. The court affirmed the judgment of the Butte County Superior Court, upholding the defendant's conviction and sentence for assault with a deadly weapon and battery on a peace officer.

N.L. v. Superior Court - Writ Review of Juvenile Order

The California Court of Appeal denied a petition for writ review concerning a juvenile court order terminating reunification services for a mother and setting a selection and implementation hearing for her two children. The court cited non-precedential status and incorporated prior findings.

People v. Saucedo - Criminal Appeal on Fines

The California Court of Appeal filed an opinion in People v. Saucedo, concerning a criminal appeal. The court reversed and remanded the case solely for reconsideration of restitution and parole revocation fines, as the trial court imposed them without considering the defendant's ability to pay.

Sorokunov v. NetApp, Inc. - California Court of Appeal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court's decision compelling arbitration and confirming an award in favor of NetApp, Inc. The court found that the plaintiff, Alexander Sorokunov, lacked standing to pursue his Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) claim due to the arbitration award.

In re S.Y. - Juvenile Dependency Case Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, affirmed a juvenile court's disposition order in the case of In re S.Y. The father appealed, arguing insufficient evidence supported his case plan, but the court found no error. The case involves juvenile dependency proceedings and reunification services.

In re Renteria - Habeas Corpus

The California Court of Appeal denied a petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by Luis Renteria. Renteria argued his reincarceration for a parole violation violated cruel and unusual punishment clauses and that the Board of Parole Hearings failed to consider relevant factors. The court found both claims lacked merit.

Sisti v. Callahan - Family Law Appeal

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court's order denying a mother's request for an evidentiary hearing to modify child custody and visitation orders. The non-precedential opinion was filed on March 3, 2026.

Kuhns v. Meta Platforms, Inc. - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, Kuhns v. Meta Platforms, Inc., was filed on March 3, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, bearing number 3:26-cv-01818, is based on diversity jurisdiction and involves personal injury and product liability claims.

CPG Management Co. LLC and Christopher Scott Reid - Consent Order

The Washington State Department of Financial Institutions issued a consent order against CPG Management Co. LLC and Christopher Scott Reid for alleged violations of the Securities Act of Washington. The order settles alleged misconduct related to investment advisory services and private investment funds.

CPUC Advocates for California Electricity Customers at FERC

The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) issued a notice detailing its advocacy efforts at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to protect California electricity customers. The CPUC's participation in FERC proceedings has reportedly saved ratepayers over $5 billion in transmission costs.

State AGs Demand GoFundMe Prove Removal of Plagiarized Charity Pages

California and 21 other state Attorneys General sent a letter to GoFundMe demanding proof that the platform has removed all unauthorized donation web pages created using charities' information without their consent. The coalition has given GoFundMe 14 days to provide this proof and disclose further information.

AG Bonta Supports Washington State Anti-Discrimination Law

California Attorney General Rob Bonta joined 13 other state attorneys general in filing an amicus brief supporting Washington State's motion for rehearing en banc. The brief opposes a Ninth Circuit panel's ruling that weakened a Washington State law prohibiting employment discrimination based on sexual orientation, arguing it harms states' ability to protect residents.

State AGs Oppose SBA Rule Undermining Disaster Laws

California Attorney General Rob Bonta led a coalition of 20 state attorneys general in filing a comment letter opposing the U.S. Small Business Administration's interim final rule. The rule would preempt state and local permitting requirements following declared disasters, allowing contractors to self-certify compliance with building codes.

Andrew Bradley Towbin v. John T. Fuller - Judicial Candidacy Qualifications

The Louisiana Court of Appeal affirmed a decision regarding judicial candidacy qualifications in the case of Andrew Bradley Towbin v. John T. Fuller. The court's disposition involved multiple dissenting opinions concerning the interpretation of eligibility requirements for a district judgeship.

Towbin v. Fuller - Court Opinion

The Louisiana Court of Appeal issued an opinion in Towbin v. Fuller, affirming a lower court's disposition. The case involves a dispute over a five-year tax period, with multiple judges dissenting on various points of law and procedure.

Andrew Bradley Towbin v. John T. Fuller - Louisiana Court of Appeal

The Louisiana Court of Appeal reviewed a case involving candidate qualification requirements. The court affirmed a lower court decision, with multiple judges dissenting on the interpretation of statutory language regarding previous tax years for certification.

Towbin v. Fuller - Orleans Clerk Case Affirmed

The Louisiana Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court's decision in Towbin v. Fuller, concerning a clerk of court. The case involved multiple dissents from the appellate judges, indicating significant disagreement on the interpretation of evidence and prior case law.

Towbin v. Fuller and Lombard - Judicial Candidate Disqualification

The Louisiana Court of Appeal affirmed a district court judgment regarding the disqualification of a judicial candidate, John T. Fuller. The case, Towbin v. Fuller and Lombard, involves an election matter concerning the candidate's eligibility for Criminal District Court. Multiple judges dissented from the majority opinion.

Lirette v. Adams - Appeals Dismissed

The Louisiana Court of Appeal for the Fourth Circuit dismissed appeals in Lirette v. Adams, involving State Farm, Geico, and Axis Ventures. The disposition indicates that the appeals were dismissed, with one judge concurring in the result. This ruling concludes the appellate proceedings for the cases consolidated under docket numbers 2025-CA-0650, 2025-CA-0651, 2025-CA-0708, and 2025-CA-0710.

Lirette v. Adams - Appeals Dismissed

The Louisiana Court of Appeal dismissed appeals in the Lirette v. Adams case. The court's disposition means the prior rulings regarding insurance coverage and a reduction in damages stand. This decision concludes the appellate phase for these specific appeals.

State of Louisiana v. A.N. - Child Custody Appeal

The Louisiana Court of Appeal affirmed a juvenile court's dispositional judgment placing a child, A.N., in the custody of the Department of Children and Family Services until her eighteenth birthday. The decision stems from a child in need of care proceeding following the death of A.N.'s sibling and pending criminal charges against the parents.

9w Halo v. Ador - Tax Exemption for Processing Operations

The Arizona Supreme Court ruled in 9w Halo OPCO, LP v. Arizona Department of Revenue that machinery used in processing operations, which changes a product's marketability, is exempt from use tax under A.R.S. § 42-5159(B)(1). The court reversed and remanded the case, clarifying that downstream transactions are irrelevant to this exemption.

Rivers v. Person - Partition and Sale Dispute

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division reviewed a lower court's decision regarding a partition and sale of a jointly owned property. The appellate court reversed the denial of a motion to vacate a default judgment against the defendants, remanding the case for further proceedings.

Paterson Firefighters Association v. City of Paterson - Labor Dispute

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division reversed a trial court's decision, reinstating an arbitration award that compelled the City of Paterson to pay the full costs of dental health insurance for Paterson Firefighters Association members. The court found the award was consistent with the parties' collective negotiation agreement and subsequent memorandum of agreement.

State of New Jersey v. Kelvin Williams - Criminal Appeal

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division issued an opinion in State of New Jersey v. Kelvin Williams. The court affirmed the defendant's convictions for sexual assault but vacated the sentence, remanding for resentencing due to insufficient reasoning on mitigating factors and potential merger of convictions.

Howard Zlotkin v. Board of Trustees - Pension Forfeiture Appeal

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division reversed a Board of Trustees decision to forfeit 10% of a teacher's pension. The court found the Board failed to act within the statutory timeframe to modify the Administrative Law Judge's initial decision, reinstating the ALJ's recommendation for a reduced forfeiture.

John W. Myers v. Wronko Loewen Benucci - Legal Malpractice Appeal

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed a lower court's decision dismissing a legal malpractice claim. The court found the plaintiff's arguments unconvincing and upheld the dismissal of all claims without prejudice.

New Jersey Superior Court Opinion on Guardianship of J.F.F.

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed a lower court's judgment terminating parental rights of G.R.F. to his daughter, J.F.F. The appeal focused on the psychologist's testimony and evaluation, which the appellant argued were flawed and deprived him of due process.

Tomaselli v. Petco - Workers' Compensation Lien Dispute

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed a lower court's decision that Petco waived its workers' compensation lien rights. The court found Petco's acceptance of a settlement amount constituted a clear waiver of its rights under N.J.S.A. 34:15-40.

90 Hackensack Ave, LLC v. Aponte Service Station, LLC - Breach of Contract

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed a jury's verdict finding Scander LLC and Bassem Scander liable for breach of contract, breach of the implied covenants of good faith and fair dealing, and fraudulent misrepresentation concerning the sale of a gas station. The jury awarded compensatory and punitive damages.

Higher Breed NJ LLC v. City of Burlington - Cannabis Retailer License

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division ruled that the City of Burlington Common Council must provide a reason for denying an application for a resolution of local support for a cannabis retailer license. The court affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded the case for further proceedings.

Pinilla Perez v. Bondi - Immigration Law

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals granted a petition challenging the Board of Immigration Appeals' denial of a motion to reopen removal proceedings. The court found the BIA provided insufficient reasons for denying equitable tolling of the 90-day filing deadline.

Care One LLC v. NLRB - Court Opinion on Unfair Labor Practice Proceedings

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's denial of a preliminary injunction sought by Care One LLC and its affiliates. The healthcare companies challenged NLRB proceedings for alleged unfair labor practices, arguing the ALJ's appointment was invalid due to a non-quorum NLRB and unconstitutional protections against presidential removal. The appellate court found the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate irreparable harm.

Broadcast Music v. North American Concert Promoters - Antitrust

The Second Circuit vacated a district court's decision in Broadcast Music, Inc. v. North American Concert Promoters Association, finding the imposed licensing rates and revenue base definition unreasonable. The court remanded the case for further proceedings, impacting how music licensing fees are determined for concert promoters.

B.B. v. Hochul - Child Welfare Certification Rights

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that fourteen children have standing to sue New York over its child welfare certification scheme, which denied relatives certification due to criminal history or child abuse reports. The court reversed in part and affirmed in part, remanding the case for further proceedings.

Reidy Contracting Group LLC v. Mt. Hawley Insurance Company - Insurance Coverage Dispute

The Second Circuit affirmed a district court's decision holding that Reidy Contracting Group LLC was an additional insured under Mt. Hawley Insurance Company's policy. The court found that the Employers Liability Exclusion was ambiguous and must be construed against Mt. Hawley.

United States v. Aryeetey - Felon in Possession of Firearm Conviction Affirmed

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction and sentence of Ivan Joel Aryeetey for being a felon in possession of a firearm. The court found no abuse of discretion in admitting DNA evidence and deemed the sentence substantively reasonable.

SBK ART LLC v. Akin Gump - Discovery for Foreign Litigation

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's order granting SBK ART LLC's petition for discovery in aid of foreign litigation under 28 U.S.C. §1782. The court disagreed with Akin Gump's argument that discovery should be denied if not discoverable from the foreign client.

Mar-Can Transport Co. v. Local 854 Pension Fund - ERISA Withdrawal Liability

The Second Circuit affirmed a district court's decision in Mar-Can Transport Co. v. Local 854 Pension Fund, reducing Mar-Can's ERISA withdrawal liability by $1.8 million. The ruling clarifies the interpretation of a key ERISA provision regarding the calculation of withdrawal liability when an employer changes pension plans due to union representation changes.

US v. Jimenez - 105 Months Prison for Ammunition Possession

The Second Circuit affirmed a district court's sentence of 105 months imprisonment and three years of supervised release for William Jimenez, who pleaded guilty to possessing ammunition after a felony conviction. The court upheld special conditions of supervised release, including electronic device searches and mandatory mental health counseling.

Lanesborough v. Nextres, LLC - Arbitration Award Appeal

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed a district court's decision regarding an arbitration award between Lanesborough 2000, LLC and Nextres, LLC. The court affirmed in part the partial confirmation of the award and the award of prejudgment interest, but vacated in part the injunction of a state-court proceeding due to potential conflict with the Anti-Injunction Act.

Safdieh v. Commissioner - Tax Penalty Assessment

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Commissioner of Internal Revenue may assess penalties for failing to report foreign business control under I.R.C. § 6038(b) through administrative assessment, vacating a Tax Court order. The court remanded the case for further proceedings.

McGucken v. Shutterstock, Inc. - Copyright Infringement Appeal

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals partially affirmed and partially vacated a district court's ruling in McGucken v. Shutterstock, Inc. The court affirmed the dismissal of claims regarding false copyright management information but vacated the dismissal of copyright infringement claims, remanding for further proceedings on DMCA safe harbor issues.

Connecticut Fair Housing Center v. CoreLogic Rental Property Solutions - Fair Housing Act

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated in part, affirmed in part, and reversed in part a lower court decision concerning CoreLogic Rental Property Solutions. The court found the Connecticut Fair Housing Center lacked standing and that CoreLogic did not violate the Fair Housing Act regarding disparate impact claims, but did violate the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

United States v. Boria cocaine conspiracy firearm possession appeal

United States v. Boria cocaine conspiracy firearm possession appeal

Duke v. Luxottica - ERISA Retirement Plan Class Action

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on a class action lawsuit against Luxottica regarding its retirement plan. The court held that a former employee has standing to seek plan reformation but not monetary payments to the plan, and that the effective vindication doctrine precludes mandatory arbitration of claims on behalf of the plan.

United States v. Woods - Competency and Hospitalization

The Second Circuit affirmed a district court's order extending a defendant's hospitalization beyond the initial four-month period while the government decided on civil commitment. The court clarified the application of 18 U.S.C. § 4241(d)(2)(B) regarding extended hospitalization for defendants found incompetent to stand trial.

US v. Cardenas - Cocaine Import Conspiracy Conviction

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the conviction of Jay James Roldan Cardenas for conspiracy to import cocaine. The court found that the district court erred in excluding evidence relevant to Roldan's defense of lacking criminal intent, remanding the case for further proceedings.

State AGs Defend Law Preventing USPS Mailing of Handguns

New York, New Jersey, and Delaware Attorneys General are intervening in a lawsuit to defend a federal law (Section 1715 of the U.S. criminal code) that prohibits mailing handguns and concealable firearms via USPS. This action follows a DOJ opinion questioning the law's constitutionality.

In re A.M. - Ohio Court of Appeals Opinion

The Ohio Court of Appeals reversed a lower court's decision denying a motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum for a victim's mental health records. The appellate court found that the trial court erred in ordering the production of privileged records for an in camera inspection without proper analysis.

RDAR Corporation v. City of Milwaukee Board of Review - Tax Appeal

The Wisconsin Court of Appeals has released an opinion in the case of RDAR Corporation v. City of Milwaukee Board of Review, docket number 2024AP001326. The opinion is dated March 3, 2026, and is available in PDF format.

State v. Jonathon L. Sundermeyer - Criminal Appeal

The Wisconsin Court of Appeals has released an opinion in the criminal case State v. Jonathon L. Sundermeyer, case number 2024AP002007-CR. The opinion is dated March 3, 2026, and is available in PDF format.

State v. Marion Larue Pattillo - Criminal Appeal

The Wisconsin Court of Appeals has released an opinion in the criminal case State v. Marion Larue Pattillo, case number 2024AP000705-CR. The opinion is dated March 3, 2026, and is available in PDF format.

State v. Jeffrey M. McCulloch - Criminal Appeal

The Wisconsin Court of Appeals has released an opinion in the criminal case State v. Jeffrey M. McCulloch, docket number 2024AP000056. The opinion is dated March 3, 2026, and is available in PDF format.

Eatmon v. Eatmon - Custody Dispute

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued a non-precedential decision affirming an order regarding child custody between Tamra A. Eatmon and Lynn Eatmon. The case involved a dispute over the custody of their child, M.E., with the court affirming the lower court's order.

Com. v. Dartoe, T. - Non-Precedential Superior Court Decision

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania reversed an order granting Thomas Dartoe's petition for post-conviction relief, which had ordered his release from custody. The court found that Dartoe's untimely petition did not establish a newly discovered fact regarding his age at the time of the offense.

Xu v Ng - Non-Precedential Decision

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued a non-precedential decision in Xu v. Ng, vacating a judgment and remanding for dismissal due to failure to join an indispensable party. The case involves a dispute over a property lease and option to purchase.

Com. v. Day, L. - Criminal Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a non-precedential decision in the criminal appeal of Com. v. Day, L. The court reversed one conviction (PWID) and affirmed others, vacating part of the judgment of sentence. The appeal concerned the denial of a motion to suppress evidence and the sufficiency of evidence for the PWID conviction.

Com. v. Gardner, L. - Criminal Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a non-precedential decision affirming the dismissal of Leo A. Gardner's second petition for relief under the Post Conviction Relief Act. The case involves charges of attempted murder, aggravated assault, and terroristic threats stemming from a 2017 incident.

Com. v. Crim - Criminal Case Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court vacated a lower court's order dismissing criminal charges against Howard Curtis Crim. The appellate court found that the lower court erred in dismissing the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to establish a prima facie case. The case is remanded for trial.

In the Int. of S.C. - Juvenile Delinquency Appeal

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania dismissed an appeal concerning a juvenile's out-of-home placement. The court found the appeal fell outside the scope of the relevant rule, which limits challenges to the fact of placement rather than the specific agency or institution.

Commonwealth v. Calhoun - Appeal of Order Granting New Trial

The Pennsylvania Superior Court is reviewing an appeal by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania against an order granting a motion for extraordinary relief and a new trial to Gabriel Calhoun. The court's decision will impact the proceedings in this criminal case.

Com. v. Cruz-Zambrana - Criminal Appeal Dismissal

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania dismissed the appeal of Angel Enrique Cruz-Zambrana in docket numbers 157 MDA 2025 and 165 MDA 2025. The dismissal was due to the appellant's failure to file a required appellate brief after the trial court issued its opinion.

Com v Hodges - Criminal Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a non-precedential decision in the case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Ichywond Hodges. The court affirmed the judgment of sentence following the appellant's conviction for sexual assault.

Com. v. Kirkland, K - Criminal Appeal

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued a non-precedential decision in Commonwealth v. Kirkland, K. The court affirmed the trial court's denial of the appellant's motion to suppress a firearm recovered during a traffic stop, upholding the judgment of sentence for carrying a firearm without a license and careless driving.

Commonwealth v. Gaddy - PCRA Appeal

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania affirmed the dismissal of Jerry R. Gaddy's Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA) petition. The court found the petition to be untimely filed and Gaddy failed to establish an exception to the statutory time-bar. The original conviction dates back to 1976.

Com. v. Gibson, J. - Non-Precedential Superior Court of Pennsylvania Case

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania affirmed the dismissal of Jalen Demere Gibson's Post Conviction Relief Act petition. The court addressed issues related to the exclusion of evidence and jury instructions in a murder conviction appeal.

Com. v. Ramos-Perez, I. - Criminal Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a non-precedential decision in the criminal appeal case of Commonwealth v. Ramos-Perez, I. The court affirmed the judgment of sentence entered by the Court of Common Pleas of York County. The case involves multiple charges including attempted murder, aggravated assault, burglary, and terroristic threats.

In Re: G. Bush, Appeal of: M. Bush - Estate Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court affirmed a lower court's order invalidating a will based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence. The decision stems from a long-standing dispute within the Bush family over the estate of Genevieve Bush.

Duffy v. Tatum - Pennsylvania Superior Court Opinion

The Pennsylvania Superior Court affirmed a lower court's decision in Duffy v. Tatum, ruling that a company's website did not provide sufficiently clear notice of its terms of service, thus a consumer did not agree to waive their right to a jury trial. The case involved preliminary objections related to an alternative dispute resolution clause.

Hopkins v. Hopkins - Non-Precedential Superior Court Decision

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued a non-precedential decision in Hopkins v. Hopkins, affirming a lower court's order that dismissed a grandfather's custody complaint. The decision addresses the dismissal of a custody complaint concerning a child born in June 2024.

In re A.A.M.S. and D.L.S. - Termination of Parental Rights Appeal

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued a non-precedential opinion affirming the termination of a mother's parental rights for two children. The appeal concerned the decrees entered by the Court of Common Pleas of Erie County.

Cutchember v. State - Criminal Procedure Retroactivity

The Maryland Court of Appeals ruled that the state's new law (CP § 1-211), which prohibits stops or searches based solely on the odor of cannabis, does not apply retroactively to incidents occurring before its July 1, 2023 effective date. This decision impacts the application of the exclusionary remedy for cannabis-related stops and searches conducted prior to the statute's enactment.

Certain Freight Rail Couplers from India: Preliminary Countervailing Duty Determination

The International Trade Administration has issued a preliminary affirmative countervailing duty determination concerning certain freight rail couplers and parts thereof from India. This notice aligns the final determination with the final antidumping duty determination.

International Trade Commission - Disposable ENDS Investigation

The International Trade Commission has instituted an investigation into certain disposable and other closed-system electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) devices and components thereof. This notice initiates the investigation, identified as Investigation No. 337-TA-1486, under Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930.

International Trade Commission - Violation of Section 337

The International Trade Commission has issued a final determination finding a violation of Section 337 concerning certain cameras, camera systems, and accessories. Remedial orders have been issued, and the investigation has been terminated.

Ferrovanadium from China and South Africa Determinations

The International Trade Commission has published a notice regarding the fourth review of determinations concerning ferrovanadium from China and South Africa. This notice is part of ongoing investigations related to trade practices.

OFAC Sanctions Rwanda's Military and Four Officials

On March 2, 2026, OFAC sanctioned Rwanda's Defence Force (RDF) and four senior officials for supporting the M23 armed group in the DRC. This action blocks their assets in the U.S. and prohibits transactions with U.S. persons. A general license allows for winding down existing dealings until April 1, 2026.

Standard Instrument Approach Procedures and Takeoff Minimums Amendments

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has published amendments to standard instrument approach procedures, takeoff minimums, and obstacle departure procedures. These changes are effective March 3, 2026, and are part of routine updates to aviation regulations.

FAA Amends Instrument Approach, Takeoff Minimums, and Obstacle Departure Procedures

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has amended standard instrument approach procedures, takeoff minimums, and obstacle departure procedures. These amendments are part of routine updates to ensure aviation safety and navigational accuracy.

FAA Airworthiness Directive for Airbus Helicopters

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has issued an airworthiness directive concerning Airbus Helicopters due to a risk of stabilizer loss. This rule mandates specific actions for operators to ensure continued airworthiness.

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has issued an airworthiness directive (AD) for Airbus EC120B helicopters. This rule mandates specific actions to address potential safety issues, with an effective date of April 7, 2026.

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters Rotor Modifications

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has issued an airworthiness directive requiring modifications to Airbus Helicopters. This rule mandates specific actions to address potential safety issues related to rotor systems. The directive is effective April 7, 2026.

Proposed Airworthiness Directive for Rolls-Royce Engines

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has issued a proposed airworthiness directive concerning Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG engines. This proposal is open for public comment for 45 days.

Class C Airspace Amendment Meeting Southwest Florida International Airport

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is proposing an amendment to the Class C airspace at Southwest Florida International Airport, FL. A public meeting will be held to discuss the proposed changes, and the comment period closes on May 29, 2026.

USITC Institutes Patent Infringement Investigation 337-TA-1488

The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has instituted an investigation into alleged patent infringement of certain gyro-stabilized electric unicycles and components. The investigation, based on a complaint by Inventist, Inc. and Alien Technology Group, Inc., names several Chinese manufacturers as respondents.

Greely v. Greely, Jr. et al - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, Greely v. Greely, Jr. et al, was filed on March 3, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The complaint alleges violations of RICO and fraudulent conveyances, seeking recovery of damages.

EPA Extends Comment Period for Ozone NAAQS Rule

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has extended the public comment period for the proposed rule regarding the Interstate Transport Plan Review for the 2015 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). The comment period, originally set to end, has been extended by 20 days.

Air Plan Approval; AK; Regional Haze State Implementation Plan

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has approved Alaska's State Implementation Plan for the second implementation period concerning regional haze. This final rule is effective April 2, 2026. It pertains to air quality regulations under 40 CFR 52.

Feng v. US Dept of State - Immigration Action

A new civil case, Feng v. US Dept of State et al, was filed on March 3, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves 'Other Immigration Actions' with the U.S. Government as the defendant. The filing fee was $405.

Colorado Celebrates Weights and Measures Week

Colorado's Division of Oil & Public Safety and Department of Agriculture are celebrating Weights and Measures Week, March 1-7, 2026. The event highlights the work of state inspectors in ensuring accuracy in retail transactions, from fuel pumps to grocery scales, protecting consumers and businesses.

Colorado Consumer Complaints Reach Record High in 2025

The Colorado Attorney General's office reported a record number of nearly 27,000 consumer complaints in 2025, a 10% increase from 2024. The top complaint categories included retail sales, professional services, real estate, and debt collection. This notice highlights the importance of reporting scams during National Consumer Protection Week.

EMT Sentenced for License Fraud

The Colorado Attorney General announced the sentencing of Lauren Wilson to six years in prison for falsifying her paramedic license application. Wilson pleaded guilty to attempting to influence a public servant after providing false information regarding her criminal history and birth date. This case highlights the importance of accurate credentialing in healthcare.

GAO Report: VA Not Fully Implementing Caregiver Support Recommendations

A GAO report released March 2, 2026, found the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has not fully implemented GAO's recommendations to improve access to community care and caregiver support programs. The report highlights ongoing issues with timely appointment scheduling, referral coordination, and communication, despite legislative mandates from the Dole Act.

GAO Report on Federal Agency Whistleblower Protections

A GAO report highlights that federal agencies employ various methods to encourage and protect whistleblowers, such as confidentiality and award programs. The report notes challenges like processing high volumes of reports and addresses concerns about overly broad non-disclosure agreements impacting employees' ability to report wrongdoing.

GAO: HHS Guidance on State Congregate Care Spending

The GAO has issued guidance recommending that HHS provide clearer details on when states can apply exemptions to the 14-day limit for congregate care spending under the Family First Act. This aims to ensure consistent application of exemptions, particularly for youth at risk of sex trafficking, and address states' varying interpretations of funding rules.

GAO: SBA Should Improve Data Sharing Efficiency with IRS

The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a report recommending that the Small Business Administration (SBA) take steps to make data sharing with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) more efficient. The report highlights inefficiencies in verifying taxpayer consent for data sharing, suggesting direct data receipt or technological improvements could prevent fraud and improper payments.

GAO Report on Animal Drug Incentives and Unmet Needs

The GAO released a report highlighting a lack of FDA-approved animal drugs for minor species and rare conditions, despite existing incentives. The report identifies high development costs and limited markets as key barriers and suggests FDA develop a benefit-risk assessment for alternative approaches to drug approval.

Chrystal Robinson v. Quicken Loans Inc - Discrimination Case

The Michigan Court of Appeals reversed and remanded a lower court's decision in Chrystal Robinson v. Quicken Loans Inc. The case involves claims of race, sex, and age discrimination, retaliation, and hostile work environment under Title VII and the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act. The appellate court's decision requires further proceedings in the trial court.

Mary Free Bed Hosp v. Esurance - Insurance Priority Dispute

The Michigan Court of Appeals ruled in Mary Free Bed Hosp v. Esurance that an injured party or their treatment provider can claim additional benefits from a lower-priority insurer after exhausting the coverage limit of a higher-priority insurer, provided the lower-priority policy offers unlimited coverage. This decision addresses a question of first impression under Michigan's no-fault act.

Tiffany Wells v. Sterling Atlanta Apartments - Emergency Motion Granted

The Court of Appeals of Georgia granted an emergency motion in Tiffany Wells v. Sterling Atlanta Apartments, LLC, staying a superior court order that dismissed Wells's petition for review. The stay is in effect until Wells files an application for discretionary appeal or the time to do so expires.

Chavis v. McDowell Properties - Discretionary Application Dismissed

The Court of Appeals of Georgia dismissed a discretionary application in the case of Chavis v. McDowell Properties of Ga, LLC. The court found it lacked jurisdiction because the appeal was not filed within the statutorily required seven-day period for dispossessory actions.

Franklin v. Georgia Vocational Rehabilitation Agency - Dismissed Appeal

The Court of Appeals of Georgia dismissed an appeal filed by Christopher Franklin against the Georgia Vocational Rehabilitation Agency. The dismissal was based on multiple procedural grounds, including untimeliness and failure to follow discretionary appeal procedures.

Mary Brown v. Tmf Avondale Townhomes LLC - Case Transfer

The Georgia Court of Appeals has transferred the case of Mary Brown v. Tmf Avondale Townhomes LLC to the appropriate Superior/State Court. The court determined it lacked jurisdiction over the appeal from the Magistrate Court of DeKalb County.

Adria Blalock v. Kbc Ventures - Discretionary Application Dismissed

The Court of Appeals of Georgia dismissed a discretionary application filed by Adria Blalock against Kbc Ventures. The court found it lacked jurisdiction because the application was untimely filed more than seven days after the magistrate court's judgment, violating OCGA § 44-7-56(b)(1).

Kothari v. Dunwoody Lakes Condominium Association, Inc. - Dismissed

The Court of Appeals of Georgia dismissed the appeal in Kothari v. Dunwoody Lakes Condominium Association, Inc. (Docket No. A26A1317). The dismissal was due to the appeal being duplicative of a previously filed appeal in Case No. A26A1279.

Court of Appeals of Georgia dismisses interlocutory application

The Court of Appeals of Georgia dismissed an interlocutory application filed by Traditions Health, LLC and other defendants. The dismissal was due to the trial court's certificate of immediate review being filed fifteen days after the order, exceeding the ten-day jurisdictional limit.

Safeway Insurance v. McCrackin - Case Withdrawn

The Court of Appeals of Georgia has granted Safeway Insurance Company of Georgia's motion to withdraw its appeal in the case Safeway Insurance Company of Georgia v. Celeste McCrackin. The court has released jurisdiction back to the trial court.

Irwinville Peanut & Grain v. Roberts - Interlocutory Application Denied

The Court of Appeals of Georgia denied an interlocutory application filed by Irwinville Peanut & Grain, Inc. in the case against James Hugh Roberts. The disposition was ordered on March 3, 2026, with docket number A26I0129.

Op-Ed: US Agriculture Trade Policy Under Trump Administration

The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative published an op-ed detailing the Trump Administration's trade policy approach to support American farmers and food producers. The article outlines a two-fold strategy focused on negotiating trade deals and addressing foreign tariff regimes to ensure a level playing field for U.S. agriculture exports.

USTR Announces 2026 Trade Policy Agenda and 2025 Annual Report

The U.S. Trade Representative has announced the 2026 Trade Policy Agenda and the 2025 Annual Report. These documents outline the administration's 'America First' trade strategy, focusing on protecting U.S. jobs and expanding market access for American exporters.

Luminate Home Loans Fined $100k, Surrenders License

The Washington State Department of Financial Institutions has issued a consent order against Luminate Home Loans, Inc., requiring a $100,000 fine and the surrender of its consumer loan license. The company is prohibited from participating in Washington's mortgage broker or consumer loan industry until February 20, 2031.

Supreme Court Orders List and Certiorari Denials

The U.S. Supreme Court issued an order list on March 2, 2026, detailing decisions on pending cases. This included denials of applications for stay and bail, motions for leave to file under seal, and the receipt of a Special Master's report in an original jurisdiction case. The Court also denied various petitions for certiorari.

Justice Dept. distributes $15.5M to securities fraud victims

Justice Dept. distributes $15.5M to securities fraud victims

Jason Goodhue Fined for Securities Law Violations

The Connecticut Department of Banking has issued a final order fining Jason A. Goodhue $100,000 for violating state securities laws. Goodhue engaged in dishonest or unethical practices and exercised discretionary power in customer accounts without written authorization.

Colorado Public Health Officials Confirm Measles Case

Colorado public health officials confirmed a measles case in an Adams County resident and identified locations and times of potential public exposure in Broomfield and Westminster. The notice advises individuals who may have been exposed to monitor for symptoms and contact health officials if they develop them.

Presidential Nominations Sent to the Senate

The White House announced that eleven nominations have been sent to the Senate for consideration. These nominations span various government roles, including judges, ambassadors, and agency directors. The nominations were formally sent on March 2, 2026.

Federal Student Loan Interest Rates Announced for July 2025-June 2026

The US Department of Education announced the annual interest rates for fixed-rate Federal Student Loans made under the William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program. These rates apply to loans with first disbursement dates between July 1, 2025, and June 30, 2026.

Annual Notice of Variable-Rate FFEL Loan Interest Rates

The Department of Education has published its annual notice of variable interest rates for Federal Family Education Loan (FFEL) Program loans made prior to July 1, 2010. These rates are effective for the period of July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2026.

Federal Student Loan Interest Rates Notice

The U.S. Department of Education has published its annual notice of interest rates for variable-rate Federal Direct Stafford/Ford Loans, Direct Unsubsidized Stafford/Ford Loans, and Direct PLUS Loans. These rates are effective for the period of July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2026.

Comment Request: Accrediting Agencies Reporting to Dept. of Education

The Department of Education is requesting comments on reporting requirements for recognized accrediting agencies. This notice concerns the collection of information regarding institutions and programs accredited by these agencies, as mandated by the Higher Education Act.

Om Anaya, Inc. Enforcement Action and Comment Period

The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) has proposed an enforcement action against Om Anaya, Inc. for alleged violations of water control statutes and regulations at its Hanover, Virginia facility. A public comment period for the proposed Consent Order is open from March 3, 2026, to April 2, 2026.

H.J.A.E. v. Warden, Stewart Detention Center - Habeas Corpus

The U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia issued an order in H.J.A.E. v. Warden, Stewart Detention Center, applying principles from prior cases to grant a bond hearing for a detained noncitizen. The court referenced docket number 4:26-cv-150.

Ervin Joiner v. Houston County Sheriff's Department - Civil Case

The U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia denied a prisoner's motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis. The court found the notice of appeal did not comply with federal rules and that a certificate of appealability, previously denied, was required.

Guardion Medical LLC v. Medcost Benefit Services LLC - No Surprises Act Dispute

Guardion Medical LLC has filed a lawsuit against Medcost Benefit Services LLC in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, seeking to confirm arbitration awards issued under the No Surprises Act. Medcost has moved to dismiss the case, arguing the Act does not provide a private right of action for confirming such awards.

NY State Labor Department Opens Lower Manhattan Career Center

The New York State Department of Labor has opened a new Lower Manhattan Career Center. The center will provide job seekers with career assistance and local businesses with resources to build a skilled workforce. This expansion is part of the department's statewide network of career centers.

Presidential Message on Read Across America Day

The White House issued a message from the President and First Lady celebrating Read Across America Day on March 2, 2026. The message highlights the importance of reading and literacy, referencing a $256 million grant from the Department of Education to strengthen reading in classrooms.

First Lady Addresses UN Security Council on Peace Through Education

First Lady Melania Trump addressed the U.N. Security Council on March 2, 2026, during the U.S. presidency, advocating for peace through education and the democratization of knowledge. She emphasized the role of education in fostering understanding, tolerance, and enduring peace.

Presidential Message on Colorectal Cancer Awareness Month – The White House

Presidential Message on Colorectal Cancer Awareness Month – The White House

Ehrenkranz v. San Francisco Zen Center - Court Opinion

The First Appellate District of California has made an opinion available for the case Ehrenkranz v. San Francisco Zen Center et al. The case, with Court of Appeal Case Number A171527, was filed on October 4, 2024. The opinion details are available in PDF and DOCX formats.

Detention Of K.d. - Washington State Court of Appeals Opinion

The Washington State Court of Appeals has issued an opinion regarding the detention of K.D., with docket number 87551-5. The opinion was authored by Judge Michael Diaz and filed on March 2, 2026.

Alisha Brown v. Kelly Clymens - Court of Appeals Opinion

The Washington Court of Appeals has issued an opinion in the case of Alisha Brown v. Kelly Clymens. The opinion was filed on March 2, 2026, with docket number 87949-9. This document provides information about the case, including the parties, their counsel, and the lower court's proceedings.

Washington Court of Appeals Opinion: Detention of J.p.

The Washington Court of Appeals has issued an opinion in the case In The Matter Of The Detention Of J.p., with docket number 87816-6. The opinion was filed on March 2, 2026, and concerns a judgment or order filed on December 26, 2024.

Williams v. Skagit County District Court - Court of Appeals Opinion

The Washington Court of Appeals filed an opinion in the case of Mahria Williams v. Skagit County District Court on March 2, 2026. The case originated from Skagit Superior Court and involves a review of a judgment or order filed on July 22, 2025.

Court of Appeals Opinion: Manuel Parejo Petition

The Washington Court of Appeals has issued an opinion regarding a personal restraint petition filed by Manuel Parejo. The case, with docket number 88221-0, was filed on March 2, 2026. The opinion details the judgment or order under review and lists the judges and counsel involved.

Put A Bird On It, Llc. v. Seattle Arena Holdings, Llc - Civil Appeal

The Washington State Court of Appeals has issued an opinion in the case of Put A Bird On It, Llc. v. Seattle Arena Holdings, Llc. The opinion was filed on March 2, 2026, under docket number 87756-9.

State v. Kathierson - Criminal Appeal

The Washington Court of Appeals has issued an opinion in the case of State v. Kathierson, with docket number 87033-5. The opinion was filed on March 2, 2026, and concerns an appeal from a judgment entered on August 8, 2024.

State v. Marco Alonzo Cabrera - Court of Appeals Opinion

The Washington Court of Appeals has issued an opinion in the case of State v. Marco Alonzo Cabrera. The opinion was filed on March 2, 2026, under docket number 87267-2, originating from the Cowlitz Superior Court.

Veristone Fund I Llc v. Kristen Lester - Court of Appeals Opinion

The Washington Court of Appeals has issued an opinion in the case of Veristone Fund I Llc vs. Kristen Lester. The opinion was filed on March 2, 2026, with a docket number of 87243-5. This document represents a final appellate court decision.

Washington Court of Appeals Opinion: In Re The Complex Litigation Div. Of Wa Ag

The Washington Court of Appeals has issued an opinion in the case In Re The Complex Litigation Div. Of Wa Ag. The opinion was filed on March 2, 2026, and addresses a judgment or order that was filed on July 15, 2024.

Safdieh v. Commissioner - Tax Penalty Assessment

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Commissioner of Internal Revenue may assess penalties for failing to report foreign business control under I.R.C. § 6038(b) through administrative assessment, overturning a Tax Court decision. This decision impacts how the IRS collects these specific penalties.

US v. Cardenas - Cocaine Import Conspiracy Conviction Vacated

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the conviction of Jay James Roldan Cardenas for conspiracy to import cocaine. The court found that the district court erred in excluding evidence relevant to Cardenas's defense of lacking criminal intent, remanding the case for further proceedings.

Second Circuit Court of Appeals opinion on insurance case

Second Circuit Court of Appeals opinion on insurance case

Connecticut Fair Housing Center v. CoreLogic Rental Property Solutions - Housing Discrimination

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on a housing discrimination case involving CoreLogic Rental Property Solutions. The court vacated in part, affirmed in part, and reversed in part the district court's decision regarding claims under the Fair Housing Act and Fair Credit Reporting Act.

US v. Jimenez - Sentence Affirmed for Felony Conviction

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's judgment against William Jimenez, upholding his 105-month sentence and three years of supervised release for possessing ammunition after a felony conviction. The court found no abuse of discretion in the imposed special conditions of supervised release.

Second Circuit: Pension Fund Withdrawal Liability Interpretation

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision, reducing Mar-Can Transportation Company's pension fund withdrawal liability by $1.8 million. The ruling clarifies the interpretation of an ERISA provision concerning the transfer of unfunded vested benefits when an employer switches pension plans due to union representation changes.

Broadcast Music v. Concert Promoters - Antitrust Licensing Fees

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a district court's decision regarding music licensing fees between Broadcast Music, Inc. (BMI) and the North American Concert Promoters Association (NACPA). The court found the imposed rates and expanded definition of gross revenues to be unreasonable and remanded the case for further proceedings.

SBK ART LLC v. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP - Discovery for Foreign Litigation

The Second Circuit affirmed a district court's order granting SBK ART LLC's petition for discovery in aid of foreign litigation under 28 U.S.C. §1782. The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in allowing discovery from Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, even though the documents sought might not be directly discoverable from the foreign client.

Colorado Designates March as Arts Education Month

The Colorado General Assembly has designated March as Arts Education Month through Senate Resolution SR26-003. This resolution passed the Senate with a unanimous vote and aims to recognize the importance of arts education within the state's educational system.

Colorado Bill: Increase GVWR for Child Restraint System Requirements

Colorado Bill SB26-026 proposes to increase the gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) limit for passenger vehicles requiring child restraint systems from 10,000 pounds to 16,000 pounds. The bill is currently under consideration in the 2026 Regular Session.

Colorado Bill Changes to Higher Education Statutes

Colorado Bill SB26-078 proposes changes to statutes governing institutions of higher education. Key modifications include procedures for fiscal impact information sharing, data policies and coordination, capital construction project thresholds, and bond requirements for the University of Colorado. The bill also mandates the creation of a data advisory group.

Colorado Bill on Legal Notice Publication Rules

Colorado's SB26-061 proposes changes to legal notice publication rules for counties lacking a legal newspaper. The bill aims to remove publication period requirements for newspapers to be considered legal and to expand alternatives for notice publication.

Colorado Bill: Public Assistance Final Disposition Expense Terms

Colorado Senate Bill 26-110 proposes to revise terms related to public assistance final disposition expense reimbursements. The bill aims to change 'death reimbursement' to 'death benefit' and 'maximum death reimbursement' to 'combined reasonable charges' for county payments of funeral and final disposition expenses for deceased recipients.

Colorado Bill: Hiring Preference for Coal Transition Workers

Colorado Bill SB26-052 establishes a hiring preference for coal transition workers for certain businesses in coal transition communities. The bill also expands investment options for public entities managing just transition funds. It requires covered businesses to make good faith efforts to hire qualified coal transition workers.

Colorado Agricultural Property Tax Definitions Clarification

Colorado Bill SB26-010 seeks to clarify definitions for agricultural property taxation. It broadens the definitions of 'ranch' and 'farm' to emphasize predominant use for monetary profit and pasture-based operations.

Colorado Bill Limits Minimum Lot Size for Single-Family Homes

Colorado Bill HB26-1114 proposes to limit the minimum lot size for single-family homes to 2,000 square feet, effective October 1, 2031. The bill also prohibits restrictive lot dimensions that prevent single-family home construction on such small lots. It applies to subject jurisdictions within Colorado.

Perez v. HD Supply Management, LLC - Civil Rights Case

A new civil case, Perez v. HD Supply Management, LLC, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on March 2, 2026. The case involves a Notice of Removal from Santa Clara County Superior Court, with HD Supply Management, LLC listed as the filing party.

Colorado PUC Approves 4,100MW New Energy Resources for Xcel Energy

The Colorado Public Utilities Commission has approved approximately 4,100MW of new solar, storage, wind, and natural gas energy generation for Xcel Energy. This decision, made under an expedited process to leverage expiring federal tax credits, aims to replace aging coal plants and meet growing energy demand, potentially saving customers billions.

Colorado Homeowners Insurance Costs and Hail Risk Analysis

Colorado's Division of Insurance released data showing hail is the primary driver of homeowners insurance cost spikes, accounting for 26-54% of premiums. Governor Polis and the DOI are seeking innovative solutions to lower these costs for homeowners and are working on legislation for roof fortification grants and wildfire reinsurance.

Eric Gemelli Barred from Securities Sales in Colorado for 10 Years

The Colorado Securities Commissioner has barred Eric Gemelli and his company, Market4Caster, LLC, from selling securities in Colorado for 10 years following their admission to violating the Colorado Securities Act. The defendants admitted to unlicensed sales of over $3 million in unregistered securities.

IDPH Releases Carbon Monoxide Surveillance Report

The Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) has released its first carbon monoxide surveillance report, detailing unintentional CO exposures from 2019-2023. The report aims to strengthen prevention and awareness efforts to reduce emergency room visits, hospitalizations, and deaths related to CO exposure in Illinois.

City of Boston v. OptumRx, Inc. - Statute of Limitations Appeal

The First Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision dismissing the City of Boston's lawsuit against pharmacy benefit managers OptumRx and Express Scripts. The court found the city failed to file its public nuisance claim within the three-year statute of limitations, as the alleged continuing nuisance was not sufficiently pleaded with specific recent tortious acts.

DeJanee Holloway v. State of Texas - Mandamus Case Denied

The Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District, denied DeJanee Holloway's emergency petition for a writ of mandamus and dismissed the motion for immediate temporary relief. The case, docketed as 03-26-00077-CV, was related to a mandamus proceeding.

Wilson et al v. Walmart - Civil Case Filing

Walmart has filed a Notice of Removal for the case Wilson et al v. Walmart, initiating proceedings in federal court. The case was originally filed in Contra Costa County Superior Court. Walmart also filed a demand for a jury trial and a certificate of interested entities.

Dobson v. Porsche Cars North America, Inc. - Civil Case Filing

A civil case, Dobson v. Porsche Cars North America, Inc., was filed on March 2, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Porsche Cars North America, Inc. filed a Notice of Removal from Santa Clara County Superior Court, along with a Corporate Disclosure Statement.

R.P. v. United States - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, R.P. v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons), was filed on March 2, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case number is 3:26-cv-01797. The initial filings include a complaint, proposed summons, a motion to maintain anonymity, and a consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge.

Carter v. Performance Golf Products - Contract Dispute

A new civil case, Carter v. Performance Golf Products, LLC et al., was filed on March 2, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a contract dispute and includes a filing fee of $405.

Qiu v. Reality Platforms, Inc. et al - Civil Case Filing

A civil case, Qiu v. Reality Platforms, Inc. et al, was filed on March 2, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a Notice of Removal from Santa Clara County Superior Court, with case number 25CV481669.

Robinson v. Upstart Network, Inc. et al - Consumer Credit Case Filing

A new civil case, Robinson v. Upstart Network, Inc. et al, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on March 2, 2026. The case involves consumer credit and alleges federal question jurisdiction. The filing includes a complaint and a summons issued against multiple defendants.

Zhang et al v. Zhang et al - Fraud Case

A new civil case, Zhang et al v. Zhang et al, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on March 2, 2026. The case is based on diversity jurisdiction and involves a claim of fraud. The initial filing includes a complaint and payment of the filing fee.

L.O. v. United States - Civil Rights Case

A new civil case, L.O. v. United States of America et al, was filed on March 2, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a claim related to Civil Rights with the U.S. government as a defendant. The court has issued an order allowing the plaintiff to proceed under a pseudonym.

Jani v. Immigrant Investor Program Office - Immigration

A new civil case, Jani v. Immigrant Investor Program Office et al, was filed on March 2, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, bearing number 5:26-cv-01776, is categorized under 'Other Immigration Actions' and involves a Writ of Mandamus.

Sumanam et al v. Edlow et al - Immigration Case Filing

A new civil case, Sumanam et al v. Edlow et al, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on March 2, 2026. The case involves 'Other Immigration Actions' with the U.S. Government listed as a defendant.

GGH- GAL-0003 v. GGH- GAL-0003 - Civil Complaint

A new civil case, 3:26-cv-01779, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on March 2, 2026. The case involves a complaint for damages filed by GGH- GAL-0003 against GGH- GAL-0003.

I.D. v. United States of America - Civil Rights Case

A civil rights case, I.D. v. United States of America et al., was filed on March 2, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a U.S. Government Defendant and is classified under Civil Rights: Other. The filing fee was $405.

Oscar v. HD Supply Management, LLC - Civil Rights Case

A new civil case, Oscar v. HD Supply Management, LLC, was filed on March 2, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case is classified under Civil Rights and falls under diversity jurisdiction. No summary of the case is currently available.

Bezkorovayniy et al v. Edlow - Civil Immigration Case

A new civil immigration case, Bezkorovayniy et al v. Edlow, has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case was filed on March 2, 2026, with case number 5:26-cv-01798, and involves 'Other Immigration Actions'.

Castillo Gomez v. Albarran - Habeas Corpus

A Habeas Corpus case, Castillo Gomez v. Albarran et al., was filed on March 2, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The filing includes a petition for a writ of Habeas Corpus and a motion for a Temporary Restraining Order.

Birkenseer v. Jaguar Land Rover - Contract Product Liability

A civil contract product liability case, Birkenseer v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC, was filed on March 2, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case was removed from Alameda Superior Court by Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC.

E.E v. United States, Federal Bureau of Prisons - Civil Case

A new civil case, E.E v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons), was filed on March 2, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a U.S. Government Defendant and is categorized under 'Other' for the Nature of Suit. Recent filings include a proposed summons, an amended document, and a motion to maintain plaintiff anonymity.

V.L. v. United States of America - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, Case Number 3:26-cv-01796, was filed on March 2, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The plaintiff, V.L., is suing the United States of America, including the Federal Bureau of Prisons. The filing includes a complaint, proposed summons, and a motion to maintain plaintiff anonymity.

Rubin et al v. County of Santa Clara California et al - Civil Rights

A new civil rights case, Rubin et al v. County of Santa Clara California et al, was filed on March 2, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The complaint alleges violations related to civil rights and seeks damages against the County of Santa Clara and its departments.

R.M. v. United States - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, R.M. v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons), was filed on March 2, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case number is 3:26-cv-01795. Initial filings include a complaint, proposed summons, a motion to maintain plaintiff anonymity, and a consent to proceed before a US Magistrate Judge.

Brown et al v. Trove Brands, LLC - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, Brown et al v. Trove Brands, LLC, has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, bearing number 4:26-cv-01774, was filed on March 2, 2026, with a complaint and proposed summons submitted.

Richard Avina v. Evergreen Estates - Dismissal for Want of Prosecution

The Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District, has dismissed the case of Richard Avina v. Evergreen Estates for want of prosecution. The dismissal follows the appellant's failure to file a required brief by the court-ordered deadline.

In Re Ishmael Jackson v. the State of Texas - Mandamus

The Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District, denied Ishmael Jackson's petition for writ of mandamus. The court found that the record provided was insufficient to establish the right to relief, citing deficiencies in meeting the requirements of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Eli Woolsey v. Bohemian Bros., LLC - Declaratory Judgment Appeal

The Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District, has dismissed the appeal in Eli Woolsey and Kate Woolsey v. Bohemian Bros., LLC, et al. The dismissal was granted upon the appellants' unopposed motion. The case involved a declaratory judgment action.

Mark Smith v. Steptoe & Johnson PLLC - Malpractice

The Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District, dismissed the appeal in Mark Smith v. Steptoe & Johnson PLLC for want of prosecution. The dismissal occurred because the appellant failed to file a required brief or motion for extension by the court's deadline.

Assadi v. Batoei - Contract Case Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

The Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) dismissed the case Assadi v. Batoei for want of jurisdiction. The court found the appellant's notice of appeal was untimely filed, as the motion for new trial was not filed within the prescribed thirty-day period after the judgment.

Langston B. Williams Jr. v. Rex Bowers - Contract Suit

The Texas Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's judgment ordering specific performance of real estate contracts. The appellants argued the contract suit was barred by limitations and that specific performance was improperly awarded. The court found no error in the lower court's decision.

Jennifer Nutt v. Justin Blackburn - Contract Case Dismissed

The Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District, has dismissed the contract case Jennifer Nutt and 3CPL Holdings, LLC v. Justin Blackburn, et al. The dismissal was granted upon the appellants' motion. The case involved contract disputes and was docketed under number 03-26-00047-CV.

Stephen Kenneth King v. State of Texas - Habeas Corpus Denied

The Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District, denied Stephen Kenneth King's petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The court's decision was issued on February 27, 2026, and no further action or compliance is required by regulated entities.

City of Taylor v. Marek - Official Capacity Case Abated

The Texas Court of Appeals has abated the appeals in City of Taylor, Texas, et al. v. Robert Marek, et al. for an additional 90 days to allow parties to continue settlement negotiations. The court granted the joint motion to extend the abatement period.

Com. v. Brown-Camp - Criminal Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court reversed orders granting post-conviction relief to defendants Bryan Brown-Camp and Maurice Smith. The court found that the lower court erred in granting relief on PCRA petitions related to their convictions for third-degree murder and conspiracy to commit robbery.

Com. v. Flythe - Criminal Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a non-precedential decision affirming the lower court's judgment of sentence for Antarrios J. Flythe on firearms offenses. The appeal challenged the denial of a motion to suppress and the sufficiency of the evidence.

Com. v. Collins, M. - Appeal from PCRA Order

The Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a non-precedential decision in the case of Commonwealth v. Collins, M. The appeal concerns the dismissal of a petition for relief under the Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA), with the appellant claiming ineffective assistance of counsel. The court affirmed the lower court's decision.

Com. v. Al Jumaili - Criminal Appeal

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued a non-precedential decision affirming the judgment of sentence for Mohammed Rasool Kha Al Jumaili. The appeal challenged the sufficiency of evidence for convictions related to terroristic threats, simple assault, and recklessly endangering another person.

Com. v. Woods, E. - Criminal Appeal

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania affirmed the judgment of sentence for Erica T. Woods, who was convicted of charges related to a vehicular accident. The appeal concerned the sentence imposed after a non-jury trial.

Commonwealth v. Sackie - PCRA Appeal

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania affirmed the dismissal of a Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA) petition filed by Dakins Roness Sackie. The court granted counsel's motion to withdraw and affirmed the lower court's decision based on its thorough opinion.

Com. v. Rochester - Criminal Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a non-precedential decision affirming a criminal conviction for simple assault, recklessly endangering another person, and harassment. The appellant challenged the sufficiency of the evidence for the REAP conviction.

Commonwealth v. Mohn, J. - Criminal Appeal

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued a non-precedential decision in the case of Commonwealth v. Mohn, J. The court affirmed the judgment of sentence for Justin Mohn, who was convicted of first-degree murder, second-degree murder, and various other offenses. The court found that Mohn waived his claims.

Com. v. Abdul-Malik - Criminal Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a non-precedential opinion affirming the judgment of sentence for Ali Abdul-Malik. The appeal challenged the sufficiency of the evidence for his conviction of Possession of a Firearm Without a License.

Com. v. Meadows - Probation Violation Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a non-precedential decision affirming a lower court's judgment of sentence for Brian Meadows, who appealed the revocation of his probation. The appeal concerned his failure to report to probation officers while incarcerated or in halfway houses in New Jersey.

E.Q. v. M.G.P. - Custody Dispute Opinion

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued a non-precedential opinion in E.Q. v. M.G.P., vacating a lower court's custody order. The court remanded the case for a new final custody order in compliance with state statutes regarding child custody.

Cook v. Philadelphia Federal Credit Union - Appeal of Arbitration Order

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania reversed a lower court's order that overruled preliminary objections to compel arbitration in a putative class action. The case involves claims of improper notice of repossession and disposition of repossessed vehicles filed by consumers against Philadelphia Federal Credit Union.

Commonwealth v. Lassends - Criminal Appeal

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania affirmed a judgment of sentence for Harold Joel Lassends, who was convicted of Persons Not to Possess Firearms. The court addressed challenges to an evidentiary ruling and the sufficiency of evidence.

Stetler v. Eltookhy - Pennsylvania Superior Court Opinion

The Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a non-precedential decision in Stetler v. Eltookhy, reversing an order that denied a petition to strike/open a confessed judgment. The court also granted the plaintiff leave to amend the complaint to include a co-defendant.

Paytawn Erskine v. Accenture Federal Services, LLC - Appeal of District Court Order

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's order dismissing a civil action filed by Paytawn Andrew Erskine against Accenture Federal Services, LLC. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's denial of motions to alter judgment and file a second amended complaint, and its granting of the defendant's motion to dismiss.

US v. Malcolm Moore - Affirmation of Sentence

The Fourth Circuit affirmed the sentence of Malcolm Moore, who was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm. The court found that Moore's prior conviction for assault with a deadly weapon qualified as a crime of violence, supporting the sentencing enhancements applied by the district court.

Tracy Howard v. United Airlines - Civil Complaint Affirmation

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision to dismiss a civil complaint filed by Tracy Howard against United Airlines. The unpublished opinion stated that the complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. The court denied the appellant's motions to supplement the record.

Pisner v. Attorney Grievance Commission - Appeal Dismissed

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed Gary Pisner's appeal of a district court order remanding his case to state court. The court found it lacked jurisdiction to review the remand order, as such orders are generally not appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d).

Shakeri v Allen - Affirmation of District Court Decision

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision in Shakeri v. Allen, dismissing the plaintiff's civil action. The unpublished opinion found no reversible error in the district court's ruling, which was based on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion.

US v. Robert Stencil - Affirmation of Recusal Denial, Dismissal of Appeal

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed in part and dismissed in part the appeal of Robert Leslie Stencil. The court dismissed the appeal concerning the denial of Stencil's motions due to a late filing of the notice of appeal, while affirming the denial of his motion for recusal.

Marian Shearin v. United States - Civil Action Affirmance

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's dismissal of Marian Shearin's civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The appellate court modified the lower court's order to explicitly state the dismissal was without prejudice.

Davis v. Goodwin - Civil Complaint Dismissal

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision to dismiss a civil complaint filed by William Hercules Davis, Jr. The dismissal was based on the complaint's failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). This unpublished opinion does not set precedent.

US v. Jamie Ewings - Affirmation of Sentence

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction and sentence of Jamie Ewings for theft of government property. The court found no plain error in the acceptance of the guilty plea and affirmed the 13-month sentence as procedurally and substantively reasonable.

US v. Simpson - Affirmation of Wire Fraud Conviction

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of William Simpson, II, for wire fraud related to defrauding the United States of over one million dollars in COVID-19 relief funds. The court found the sentence of 36 months imprisonment to be procedurally and substantively reasonable.

US v. David Starkey - Affirmation of Felon in Possession Conviction

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of David Allen Starkey for being a felon in possession of a firearm. The court found no error in the district court's denial of Starkey's motion to dismiss the indictment on Second Amendment grounds and affirmed the sentence imposed.

Watson v. Deberry - Civil Rights Appeal

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal of James R. Watson Jr.'s pro se complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court found no reversible error in the dismissal without prejudice or the denial of the motion for reconsideration.

Tiffany Locus v. Zachariah Ross - Appeal of Dismissal

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's dismissal of Tiffany Locus's case for lack of jurisdiction. The court found that Locus failed to challenge the basis for the dismissal in her informal brief, thereby forfeiting appellate review.

Henson v. City of Virginia Beach - Civil Rights Appeal

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's dismissal of a pro se appellant's amended complaint. The court found no reversible error in the dismissal of claims brought under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, and 1986, and the Americans with Disabilities Act. Motions to supplement the record were denied.

Henson v. City of Virginia Beach - Appeal Affirmed

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision to dismiss a pro se appellant's amended complaint. The appellant alleged violations under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, and 1986, and the Americans with Disabilities Act. The court found no reversible error in the dismissal for failure to state a claim.

Sammy Mclain Jr. v. Matt Young - Appeal of § 1983 Complaint Dismissal

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal of Sammy Mclain Jr.'s § 1983 complaint. The dismissal was based on the complaint being frivolous and failing to state a claim. The appellate court found no reversible error in the lower court's orders.

Dodson v. Lutheran Village - Affirmation of Summary Judgment Ruling

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's ruling in Dodson v. Lutheran Village, granting summary judgment to the defendant on claims of religious discrimination and failure to accommodate. The unpublished opinion means the ruling does not set precedent.

Vasquez Escobar v. Bondi - Immigration Review Denial

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals denied a petition for review filed by Catalina B. Vasquez Escobar and her son, natives of Guatemala, challenging the Board of Immigration Appeals' dismissal of their asylum and withholding of removal applications. The court found substantial evidence supported the denial.

US v. Anthony Chosewood - Sentence Reduction Appeal

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial of Anthony Scott Chosewood's motion for a sentence reduction under Amendment 821 to the Sentencing Guidelines. The unpublished opinion means this decision does not set precedent.

Capel v. Norfolk Redevelopment & Housing Authority - Civil Rights Appeal

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's dismissal of a pro se appellant's amended complaint. The complaint raised claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Fair Housing Act. The court found no reversible error in the dismissal.

Jermaine Capel v. Norfolk Public Schools - Dismissal Affirmed

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal of Jermaine Capel's amended complaint against Norfolk Public Schools. The claims were brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The court found no reversible error in the dismissal.

C.D. v. Arlington School Board - IDEA Special Education Dispute

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision regarding a special education dispute under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The unpublished opinion upheld the school board's actions concerning a student's eligibility and educational program.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals denied a petition for a writ of mandamus filed by Ubong Christopher Ubokudom. The petition sought to compel the district court to appoint counsel for his daughter and rule on pending motions for injunctive relief. The court found no undue delay or entitlement to mandamus relief.

Zhang v. USCIS - Immigration Mandamus Case

A new immigration mandamus case, Zhang v. USCIS, was filed on March 2, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves claims against USCIS and other government officials related to immigration actions. Summons were issued on the same day.

In re K.W. - Permanent Custody Ruling

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's decision granting permanent custody of three children to the Crawford County Job and Family Services. The ruling found clear and convincing evidence that the children could not be placed with their parents within a reasonable time and that permanent custody was in the children's best interest.

State v. Vega - Untimely Criminal Appeal Dismissed

The Ohio Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Appellate District dismissed the criminal appeal of Michael A. Vega. The court found the appeal to be untimely filed, as it was submitted three days after the deadline and without a motion for leave to appeal.

State v. Bennett - Ohio Court of Appeals Ruling

The Ohio Court of Appeals reversed a lower court's decision to grant a motion to suppress evidence in the case of State v. Bennett. The appellate court found that the trial court applied the incorrect legal standard when evaluating the interaction between law enforcement and the defendant.

State v. Nagorka - Assault and Felonious Assault Conviction Appeal

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's judgment in the case of State v. Nagorka. The appeal concerned charges of assault and felonious assault on a peace officer, with the appellant raising issues of sufficiency of evidence, manifest weight, ineffective assistance of counsel, cumulative error, and excessive sentence.

In re T.T. - Ohio Custody Ruling

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's decision terminating parental rights and granting permanent custody of two minor children to the Lake County Department of Job & Family Services. The mother appealed the decision, citing issues with evidence and a motion for continuance.

State v. Pittman - Evidence, Stalking Order, Counsel Issues

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's judgment finding Cora Pittman guilty of violating a civil stalking protection order. The court reviewed issues related to the sufficiency of evidence, the manifest weight of the evidence, and ineffective assistance of counsel.

State v. Shefbuch - Sentencing Appeal

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a defendant's prison sentence in State v. Shefbuch, finding it was not contrary to law. The appeal concerned a 12-month sentence for drug possession and related offenses.

State v. Geitgey - Appeal of Conviction and Sentencing

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision in State v. Geitgey. The appellant appealed his convictions for domestic violence and aggravated menacing, arguing his no-contest plea was not knowing, intelligent, or voluntary. The court found no error in the trial court's acceptance of the plea.

State v. Prothro - Victim Rights, Allied Offenses, Forfeiture

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a conviction in State v. Prothro, addressing issues related to victim rights under Marsy's Law, allied offenses, and forfeiture. The court found no reversible error in the trial court's proceedings.

State v. Mills - Felonious Assault Conviction Appeal

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions of Michael Mills for assault and felonious assault. The court found that the convictions were not against the manifest weight of the evidence, upholding the trial court's decision and sentence.

State v. Slepsky - Criminal Law Opinion

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's decision in State v. Slepsky, upholding convictions for aggravated vehicular homicide and assault. The court found no abuse of discretion in granting the State's motion in limine, which precluded defense testimony regarding marijuana metabolites and impairment.

Ricksecker v. Ricksecker - Contempt and Visitation Dispute

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision regarding a father's visitation rights and conditions in a post-divorce case. The ruling addresses specific parenting time arrangements and restrictions, including the requirement for the father to remain in Ohio during his parenting time.

State v. Johnson - Guilty Plea and Felony Sentence Upheld

The Ohio Court of Appeals upheld a trial court's decision to accept a guilty plea and impose a felony sentence in the case of State v. Johnson. The defendant pleaded guilty to aggravated possession of drugs and received a ten-month prison sentence, with additional time imposed for a prior offense.

Illinois EPA Offers $1.5M for Water Supply Energy Upgrades

The Illinois EPA is offering up to $1.5 million in grant funding for energy efficiency upgrades at public water supply facilities. Projects will range from $50,000 to $500,000, with applications due by May 4, 2026. This program is funded through the U.S. Department of Energy's Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act.

FINRA Seeks Comment on Modernizing Arbitration Rules

FINRA has issued a request for comment on modernizing its arbitration rules, guidance, and processes. The notice seeks input from interested parties to help shape future revisions aimed at improving fairness, efficiency, and transparency in the arbitration forum.

Gun Owners of America v. Pamela Bondi - Attorney's Fees in Bump Stock Case

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on March 2, 2026, in Gun Owners of America v. Pamela Bondi, addressing attorney's fees for a challenge to the ATF's interpretation of bump stocks as machineguns. The court affirmed the district court's decision not to award fees, finding the ATF's position was substantially justified despite later Supreme Court rulings.

United States v. Rihanna Buddi - Sixth Circuit Opinion

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a district court's classification of Rihanna Buddi as a Tier II sex offender under SORNA, finding her to be a Tier I offender. The court vacated her supervised release sentence and remanded for resentencing due to procedural error in imposing a 20-year term.

Scott Williams v. Addison Cmty. Schs. - Sixth Circuit Opinion

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion in Scott Williams v. Addison Community Schools, vacating the district court's decision and remanding the case. The appeal concerns a constitutional tort claim under the Michigan constitution related to a school board president's removal.

Ryan Franke v. Kenny Janes - Excessive Force Civil Rights Case

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed in part and affirmed in part a district court's grant of summary judgment based on qualified immunity in a civil rights case alleging excessive force. The court found a genuine dispute of material fact regarding the necessity of the force used by Officer Kenny Janes against Ryan Franke.

United States v. Raul Robledo - Court Opinion

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Raul Robledo for possession with intent to distribute cocaine. The court found that the district court appropriately applied the Sentencing Guidelines and statutory factors in sentencing Robledo to 37 months in prison.

Pacific Hawaii Food Service LLC v. Yang - Court Opinion

The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals issued a summary disposition order in Pacific Hawaii Food Service LLC v. Yang. The court found it lacked jurisdiction to review two of the three orders appealed by the defendant, but found jurisdiction to review the order granting attorney fees and sanctions.

Weeks v. Warner - Motion for Reconsideration Denied

The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals denied a motion for reconsideration filed by Defendant-Appellant Eugene Warner in the case Weeks v. Warner. The court found the request to be untimely under the Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Abdullah v. State - Idaho Supreme Court Opinion

The Idaho Supreme Court affirmed the district court's dismissal of Azad Haji Abdullah's third successive petition for post-conviction relief. The court found the petition untimely under Idaho Code section 19-2719, which imposes a 42-day limit for capital defendants to file such claims.

City of Idaho Falls v. Idaho Department of Water Resources - Water Rights Dispute

The Idaho Supreme Court issued an amended opinion in the case City of Idaho Falls v. Idaho Department of Water Resources, concerning water rights. The court dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The opinion was filed on March 2, 2026.

Johnson v. Beadz Brothers Farms - Idaho Supreme Court Opinion

The Idaho Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's decision in Johnson v. Beadz Brothers Farms. The case involved a wrongful death claim against an employer, which was barred by the exclusive remedy rule of Idaho's Worker's Compensation Law.

Johnson v. SRM-Double L, LLC - Idaho Supreme Court Opinion

The Idaho Supreme Court issued an opinion in Johnson v. SRM-Double L, LLC, concerning a workplace accident. The court affirmed the striking of late filings but reversed summary judgment and sanctions against the plaintiff, finding insufficient analysis and inadmissible hearsay.

SEC Fines North East Asset Management $251,640.83 for Cherry-Picking

The SEC has fined North East Asset Management Group, Inc. and its principal, Gregory A. Zandlo, a total of $251,640.83 for engaging in cherry-picking. The funds will be used to create a Fair Fund for distribution to harmed investors.

SEC Fines Elanco Animal Health $15M for Misleading Revenue Disclosures

The SEC has fined Elanco Animal Health Inc. $15 million for misleading investors about its revenue growth between Q1 2019 and Q1 2020. The company used quarter-end incentives to meet internal targets without disclosing them, rendering public statements about revenue growth materially misleading. A Fair Fund has been established to distribute the penalty to harmed investors.

Nebraska Supreme Court Opinion Document

The Nebraska Supreme Court has published a new opinion document. This document is available through the Nebraska Courts Online Library. The publication date was March 2, 2026.

Nebraska Supreme Court Opinion

The Nebraska Supreme Court has published an opinion document. This document is part of the official court record and provides a final ruling on a legal matter. The publication date indicates when the opinion was made publicly available.

Lafferty v. Corient Partners - Arbitration Clause Dispute

The Delaware Court of Chancery ruled in Lafferty v. Corient Partners that the plaintiff is bound by an amended agreement, including its arbitration clause, due to his acceptance of equity awards and benefits. The court denied the plaintiff's request to enjoin arbitration.

Crothersville Lighthouse Church v. Church Mutual - Insurance Dispute

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion in the insurance dispute between Crothersville Lighthouse Tabernacle Church and Church Mutual Insurance Company. The case concerns the church's claim for replacement-cost benefits following a fire, with disputes arising over repair estimates and the church's compliance with policy terms.

State v. Bailey - DWI conviction overturned

The New Mexico Court of Appeals reversed a DWI conviction for Stephen Charles Bailey. The court found that the phlebotomist who drew Bailey's blood was not authorized under the Implied Consent Act, making the blood-alcohol test results inadmissible. The conviction was overturned due to prejudice from the admission of these results.

State v. Soto - New Mexico Court of Appeals Opinion

The New Mexico Court of Appeals reversed a perjury conviction for Ricardo Soto. The court held that using a defendant's invocation of their right to counsel as evidence of a sound mental state violates due process. This ruling establishes a precedent for New Mexico appellate courts.

Dennie v. Montgomery County - Workers' Compensation Offset Law

The Maryland Court of Special Appeals ruled that the workers' compensation law in effect at the time of an employee's disablement, not a later amendment, applies to benefit offset calculations. The court reversed a lower court's decision, remanding the case for further proceedings.

City of Brunswick v. Handler - Police Disciplinary Procedures

The Maryland Court of Special Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision in City of Brunswick v. Handler, ruling that the Maryland Police Accountability Act's trial board process applies to all disciplinary actions against police officers, not just those involving the public. This clarifies the scope of disciplinary procedures for law enforcement agencies in Maryland.

Jin Quan Yang v. Pacific Hawaii Food Service LLC - Appeal of Circuit Court Orders

The Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii has issued a summary disposition order in the case of Pacific Hawaii Food Service LLC v. Jin Quan Yang. The court found it lacked jurisdiction to review two of the three appealed orders but upheld the appealability of an order granting attorney fees and sanctions against the appellant, Jin Quan Yang, and his counsel.

Weeks v. Warner - Order Denying Reconsideration

The Intermediate Court of Appeals of the State of Hawaii denied a motion for reconsideration filed by Defendant-Appellant Eugene Warner in the case of Weeks v. Warner. The court found the request to be untimely under Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 40(a).

Rosa v. Kaua'i Police Department - Rehearing Motion Dismissed

The Supreme Court of the State of Hawai'i has dismissed a motion for reconsideration filed by Austin Rosa concerning a previous order. The court cited Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 40.1(h), which states that rejections of applications for certiorari are final and not subject to reconsideration.

Arturo P. Batac v. Verizon - Rhode Island Supreme Court Opinion

The Rhode Island Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's decision in the case of Arturo P. Batac v. Verizon. The court found no error in the prior proceedings which led to the affirmation of the judgment in favor of Verizon.

Corteva v. Inari Agriculture - Seed-Biotechnology IP Dispute

The US District Court for the District of Delaware issued an opinion in Corteva Agriscience LLC v. Inari Agriculture, Inc. (Case No. 23-1059), resolving two motions related to a seed-biotechnology intellectual property dispute. The court ruled in favor of Corteva, denying Inari's motion for leave to amend its answer and counterclaims.

Delaware Court of Chancery Denies Motion to Amend Complaint

The Delaware Court of Chancery denied a motion to amend a complaint in the In re Saama Technologies Litigation (C.A. No. 2022-1045-LWW). The plaintiff sought to add claims for fraud and aiding and abetting shortly before a trial was set to begin.

DOJ Announces New Trade Fraud Enforcement Initiative

The US Department of Justice has announced a new Trade Fraud Task Force and initiative, elevating trade fraud enforcement to a national and economic security priority. This signals increased scrutiny and criminal enforcement actions against companies involved in customs violations, tariff evasion, and forced labor.

Russia/Ukraine Sanctions Update - February 2026

The U.S. OFAC issued an amended General License 131C extending certain transactions related to Lukoil International GmbH through April 1, 2026, and updated related FAQs. The EU also extended its sanctions against Russia until February 24, 2027, and added eight individuals to its sanctions list.

State and Education Depts. Partner on Foreign Gift Reporting

The U.S. Department of Education and the U.S. Department of State have formed a partnership to jointly oversee Section 117 foreign gift and contract reporting requirements for higher education institutions. This collaboration aims to streamline oversight and enhance transparency regarding foreign influence in academia.

EU Scales Back ESG Reporting and Due Diligence Rules

The EU has published amendments to the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CS3D) via the Omnibus Directive EU 2026/470. These changes significantly reduce the scope of reporting and due diligence requirements for companies operating in the EU, including higher thresholds and adjusted compliance timelines.

Florida AG Creates Unit to Combat Foreign Adversary Threats

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier announced the creation of the CHINA Prevention Unit to combat threats from foreign adversaries, particularly the Chinese Communist Party, to consumer data privacy and economic security. The unit will audit companies and pursue enforcement actions for violations.

China's Cross-Border Data Transfer Regime Enforcement Trends

China's Cyberspace Administration has released two enforcement cases from 2025 concerning violations of cross-border data transfer requirements. These cases, involving hotel and property management sectors, highlight the increasing focus on compliance with the country's data export regulations.

Greece Enacts New Law to Combat Art Forgery and Protect Cultural Heritage

Greece has enacted Law No. 5271/2026, establishing a new legal framework to combat art forgery and protect cultural items. The law introduces autonomous criminal offenses for forgery and damage to artworks, alongside stricter penalties and a new register for certified art experts. This aims to enhance the protection of the art market and cultural heritage.

EU Commission Publishes Foreign Subsidies Regulation Guidelines

The European Commission has published new guidelines on the application of the Foreign Subsidies Regulation (FSR). These guidelines clarify criteria for assessing distortive foreign subsidies, outline a balancing test for negative versus positive effects, and detail the Commission's power to request prior notification of below-threshold cases.

Europe's Phaseout of Russian Gas by 2027 and Contractual Risks

Europe is mandating the phaseout of Russian gas imports by 2027, creating significant market and contractual risks for energy companies. The guidance outlines the policy shift, its impact on gas and LNG contracting, and strategies for managing increased contractual risk due to compressed timelines and geopolitical pressures.

Gulf Conflict Impacts Global Oil and LNG Markets

Vinson & Elkins LLP published a notice on March 2, 2026, detailing the potential impacts of the Gulf conflict on global oil and LNG markets. The analysis highlights how the duration and intensity of hostilities could affect crude prices, contractual performance, and supply chain stability for energy companies.

USTR Seeks Input on Critical Minerals Trade Agreement

The Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) has opened a public docket to gather stakeholder input for a proposed "Plurilateral Agreement on Trade in Critical Minerals." This initiative aims to establish multinational policies for critical minerals supply chains, potentially including pricing mechanisms and investment incentives, following President Trump's Section 232 Proclamation.

UK Securitisation Proposals Diverge from EU Position

The UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) have released consultation papers proposing reforms to the UK securitisation framework. These proposals aim to liberalise due diligence obligations and align with international, particularly US, market practices, diverging from the EU's approach.

FinCEN and OFAC Intensify Efforts Targeting Mexican Cartel Money Laundering

FinCEN and OFAC are intensifying efforts against Mexican cartel money laundering, targeting over 100 US Money Services Businesses (MSBs) along the southwest border. Recent actions include sanctions against individuals and entities linked to the Hysa Organized Crime Group and proposed rulemaking to identify certain Mexican gambling transactions as primary money laundering concerns.

Trump Ends IEEPA Tariffs, Imposes New Trade Act Tariffs

President Trump ended tariffs imposed under IEEPA and initiated new tariffs under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, set at 15% and lasting 150 days. The USTR also announced new Section 301 investigations targeting major trading partners. These changes took effect February 20, 2026.

In-Transit Freight Financing for Working Capital

This article discusses in-transit freight financing, a method for businesses to convert goods in transit into financeable assets to unlock working capital. It highlights how this strategy can help companies manage cash flow disruptions caused by unpredictable global supply chains and recommends partnering with experienced lenders.

China's 2025 Arbitration Law Effective

China's amended Arbitration Law, effective March 1, 2026, introduces significant reforms to its arbitration framework. Key changes include codifying the arbitration seat, expanding foreign-related arbitration access, strengthening court support for interim relief, and allowing limited ad hoc arbitration. International companies doing business with China should review their dispute resolution clauses.

Supreme Court Invalidates IEEPA Tariffs; President Rescinds

The Supreme Court ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize the President to impose tariffs. Following this decision, President Trump issued an Executive Order rescinding existing IEEPA tariffs and directing agencies to terminate their collection. Businesses are advised to review contracts and plan for potential future tariffs.

SEC Adopts Final Rules for Holding Foreign Insiders Accountable Act

The SEC has adopted final rules implementing the Holding Foreign Insiders Accountable Act. These rules require directors and officers of foreign private issuers to electronically disclose their equity holdings and transactions in their company's securities starting March 18, 2026.

IRS Guidance on Prohibited Foreign Entity Safe Harbors for Clean Energy Tax Credits

The IRS and Treasury released Notice 2026-15 providing interim guidance on calculating material assistance from prohibited foreign entities for clean energy tax credits under Sections 45Y, 48E, and 45X. The notice outlines a four-step process for determining the Material Assistance Cost Ratio (MACR) and offers certain safe harbors.

Handy v. Shaw - Arizona Court of Appeals Opinion

The Arizona Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision in Handy v. Shaw, denying a mother's petitions to modify legal decision-making and parenting time. The ruling upholds the prior order granting the father sole legal decision-making authority and restricting the mother's parenting time.

Jarvis v. Assa Abloy - Employment Law Appeal

The Arizona Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision to terminate an employment lawsuit for lack of jurisdiction after it was removed to federal court. The court also affirmed the denial of a motion to disqualify the superior court judge. The decision is non-precedential.

State v. Whipple - Arizona Court of Appeals Non-Precedential Opinion

The Arizona Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions of Stanley Charles Whipple for promoting prison contraband and transportation or sale of narcotics. The court found sufficient evidence based on surveillance footage and seized narcotics valued at over $50,000.

State v. Vigorito - Arizona Court of Appeals Opinion

The Arizona Court of Appeals issued a non-precedential decision in State v. Vigorito, concerning a petition for post-conviction relief. The court granted review of the petition but denied the requested relief.

Perez v. McCrary - Non-Precedential Court Opinion

The Arizona Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision in Perez v. McCrary, a non-precedential case concerning a dissolution of marriage. The appellate court found no error in the lower court's rulings on discovery violations, child support, debt division, or the designation of the appellant as a vexatious litigant.

Isom v. Isom - Arizona Non-Precedential Court Opinion

The Arizona Court of Appeals vacated a $5,000 contempt sanction against Jenell Isom, ruling it violated Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 35.4(a). The court granted relief, finding the sanction exceeded the $300 limit for fines imposed without a jury trial or waiver thereof.

Arizona Court Rules on Minimum Wage Initiative Repeal

The Arizona Court of Appeals ruled that a 2006 initiative allowing local governments to regulate minimum wages did not repeal a 1984 law prohibiting political subdivisions from mandating that government contractors pay prevailing wages. The court affirmed a lower court's decision, impacting Phoenix and other cities.

Dominguez v. Rowland/Vandermeer - Estate Dispute

The Arizona Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision to set aside the will of Arturo Lopez. The appeal was filed by the sister-in-law of the deceased, who argued various errors in the trial court's proceedings and findings. The appellate court found no reversible error.

Watson v. Holley - Family Law Appeal Decision

The Arizona Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision in Watson v. Holley, denying a father's motion for relief from a judgment granting the mother final legal decision-making authority. The court found the appeal of the denial of the Rule 85 motion to be without merit.

State v. Triste - Arizona Court of Appeals Non-Precedential Opinion

The Arizona Court of Appeals issued a non-precedential decision in State v. Triste, concerning a petition for post-conviction relief. The court reviewed the superior court's order denying the petition and found no abuse of discretion.

State v. Davis - Arizona Court of Appeals Opinion

The Arizona Court of Appeals issued a non-precedential decision in State v. Davis, concerning a petition for post-conviction relief. The court reviewed the superior court's order dismissing the petition and found no abuse of discretion.

Court of Appeals Opinion on Parental Rights Termination

The Arizona Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision terminating parental rights for A.S. The mother challenged the termination, which was based on prolonged substance abuse and the child's extended out-of-home placement. The court found the mother waived her right to contest by failing to appear at a crucial hearing.

State v. Jensen - Arizona Court of Appeals Opinion

The Arizona Court of Appeals denied Michael Jensen's petition for review of a lower court's dismissal of his post-conviction relief petition. This marks Jensen's seventh such proceeding, with the court finding no abuse of discretion in the dismissal.

State v. Guerrero - Non-Precedential Court Opinion

The Arizona Court of Appeals affirmed a conviction for unlawful flight from a law enforcement vehicle in State v. Guerrero. The court found that while a witness violation occurred, it did not prejudice the jury's verdict. The decision is non-precedential.

State v. Schwan - Non-Precedential Opinion

The Arizona Court of Appeals issued a non-precedential decision in State v. Schwan, affirming the appellant's convictions for aggravated driving under the influence with a suspended driver's license. The court found no arguable questions of law after reviewing the record.

Arizona Court of Appeals Opinion on Parental Rights

The Arizona Court of Appeals issued a non-precedential decision affirming the termination of parental rights for Mother F.G. The case, docketed as 1 CA-JV 25-0120, involved repeated instances of substance abuse by the mother, leading to dependency and termination proceedings.

Dyrek v. Dyrek - Arizona Court of Appeals Non-Precedential Opinion

The Arizona Court of Appeals vacated and remanded two rulings in the consolidated cases of Dyrek v. Dyrek. The appeals concerned a petition for relief from a consent decree based on alleged fraud on the court and a civil complaint for fraudulent inducement and negligent misrepresentation.

Torgyik v. bell/trans - Arizona Court of Appeals Opinion

The Arizona Court of Appeals affirmed an Industrial Commission of Arizona award in Torgyik v. bell/trans. The court found that the evidence supported the commission's decision that the petitioner employee's industrial injury was medically stationary and that the claim was closed without permanent impairment.

Abrego v. Econ/Zurich - Workers' Compensation Appeal

The Arizona Court of Appeals affirmed a decision by the Industrial Commission of Arizona to dismiss a workers' compensation claim. The dismissal was based on the claimant's failure to timely request a hearing after an award was issued.

Anthony Khorzoughi v. Department of Unemployment Assistance - PUA Benefits

The Massachusetts Appeals Court affirmed a decision denying pandemic unemployment assistance (PUA) benefits to Anthony Khorzoughi. The court found that Khorzoughi failed to demonstrate he was working in Massachusetts when his business was impacted by COVID-19, thus upholding the denial of benefits.

Adoption of Ilee - Massachusetts Appeals Court

The Massachusetts Appeals Court affirmed a Juvenile Court judge's decision to terminate a mother's parental rights and approve adoption by foster parents. The mother appealed, but the court found no error in the judge's findings or rulings.

Family Behavioral Health Inc. v. 387 Main Street Realty Trust - Appeals Court Opinion

The Massachusetts Appeals Court issued a non-precedential opinion affirming a lower court's judgment against 387 Main Street Realty Trust and Raymond Bonneville. The defendants were found liable for breach of contract, interference with business relations, and unfair trade practices. The court found the defendants' arguments regarding sufficiency of evidence were waived.

Adoption of Jazzy - Massachusetts Appeals Court Opinion

The Massachusetts Appeals Court issued a non-precedential opinion affirming a lower court's decision to terminate parental rights and approve adoption by the children's maternal aunt and uncle. The parents appealed, arguing the court failed to determine reasonable efforts by the Department of Children and Families, adequately consider guardianship, or order post-decree contact.

Coppenrath v. Pontiff Cranberries - Appeals Court Opinion

The Massachusetts Appeals Court issued a non-precedential opinion in Coppenrath v. Pontiff Cranberries, affirming a lower court's dismissal of a complaint challenging an earth removal permit. The court found the plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge the permit issued by the town of Carver's earth removal committee.

Corona-Montano v. United States - Alien Transport Sentencing Appeal

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's sentencing enhancement for transporting an unaccompanied minor in the case of Luis Francisco Corona-Montano. The court held that the Sentencing Guidelines do not require scienter for this enhancement, affirming the 71-month sentence.

Malibu and Culver City v. FAA - Standing for NextGen Initiative Challenges

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed petitions from the Cities of Malibu and Culver City challenging the FAA's NextGen initiative. The court found the cities lacked standing to sue over the 2018 amendments and that challenges to the original 2016 procedures were untimely.

Culver City v. Federal Aviation Administration - Standing to Challenge Air Traffic Procedures

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed petitions from the Cities of Malibu and Culver City challenging FAA air traffic procedures. The court found the cities lacked standing to sue, as they failed to demonstrate a reasonable probability of injury from the challenged 2018 amendments to the NextGen initiative.

US Sanctions Rwandan Officials for Violating Washington Accords

The United States has sanctioned the Rwandan Defense Force (RDF) and four senior RDF officers for their support of the M23 movement in the DRC, violating the Washington Accords for Peace and Prosperity. This action, taken under Executive Order 13413, demonstrates U.S. resolve to uphold regional stability.

NY Sues Harbourview Realty to Stop Pollution Discharges

New York State agencies have filed a lawsuit against Harbourview Realty LLC to halt alleged illegal pollution discharges into Hempstead Bay. The suit seeks injunctive relief to stop the unpermitted discharges and civil penalties for violations of the Clean Water Act.