United States — March 4, 2026

Guardianship of F.W. - California Court of Appeal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal, Fifth Appellate District, has reversed a lower court's denial of a guardianship petition for a minor, F.W. The appellate court found the trial court applied the incorrect legal standard and misunderstood relevant case law, remanding the case for further proceedings.

Ryan v. Salinas Union High School District - Appeal of Order Denying Motion to Vacate Judgment

The California Court of Appeal, Sixth Appellate District, filed a non-precedential opinion on March 4, 2026, in Ryan v. Salinas Union High School District. The court dismissed the appeal of an order denying a motion to vacate a judgment, finding the order was not appealable.

People v. Law - Felony Murder Law Resentencing

The California Court of Appeal reversed a trial court's denial of a resentencing petition filed under Penal Code section 1172.6, concerning changes to felony murder laws. The appellate court found the trial court erred in its definition of reckless indifference, requiring a remand for further proceedings.

People v. Ramirez - Criminal Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Seven, affirmed a judgment against Carlos Jose Ramirez. Ramirez appealed after pleading no contest and being sentenced to two years for being a felon in possession of a firearm. The court found no arguable issues on appeal.

People v. Stortz - Criminal Conviction Appeal

The California Court of Appeal filed a non-precedential opinion in People v. Stortz, addressing a criminal defendant's appeal of a kidnapping conviction. The court affirmed the conviction, finding that any error in denying the defendant's request to represent himself at the preliminary hearing stage was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.

People v. Williams - Criminal Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two, filed a non-precedential opinion in People v. Williams. The court affirmed the lower court's denial of the defendant's petition for recall and resentencing, despite the People conceding error in the initial denial. The case concerns sentencing for a defendant convicted of multiple violent felonies.

Piltan v. Novell - Modification of Opinion

The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Eight, issued a modification to its non-precedential opinion in Piltan v. Novell. The modification corrects the listed counsel for the appellant, with no change to the judgment itself. The original opinion was filed on March 2, 2026, and the modification was filed on March 4, 2026.

Aquat 009 v. Fine CA2/7 - Non-Precedential Opinion

The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Seven, filed a non-precedential opinion in Aquat 009, LLC v. Fine et al. The court affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded the case concerning a defaulted loan and subsequent foreclosure. The opinion is not to be published in the official reports.

In re J.P. - Juvenile Court Law Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, Sixth Appellate District, filed a non-precedential opinion in the case of In re J.P. The appeal concerns the sufficiency of evidence for a juvenile court finding that the minor committed a criminal threat. The court affirmed the jurisdictional order.

Harlem v. Corben - Appeal of Default Judgment Denial

The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Six, filed a non-precedential opinion on March 4, 2026, affirming the trial court's denial of Kenneth Corben's motion to set aside a default judgment. The default judgment was entered in favor of Krisp Productions NY, LLC, for $507,783.64.

People v. Alvarez - Criminal Sentencing Appeal

The California Court of Appeal vacated a prior strike finding against Francisco Juan Alvarez, remanding for further proceedings. This decision follows reconsideration in light of a new Supreme Court precedent regarding the retroactive application of Assembly Bill No. 333 to prior strike convictions.

People v. Delgado - Appeal of Denial to Vacate Drug Conviction

The California Court of Appeal reversed and remanded a lower court's denial of Adolfo Delgado's motion to vacate his 1991 drug conviction. The court found the motion was improperly denied as successive, impacting individuals seeking to challenge past convictions due to potential immigration consequences.

People v. Haygood - California Court of Appeal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal, Fifth Appellate District, filed a non-precedential opinion in the case of People v. Haygood on March 4, 2026. The court affirmed the judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County, upholding the conviction and sentence for first-degree murder with a firearm enhancement.

People v. Sanchez - Criminal Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two, filed a non-precedential opinion in the case of People v. Sanchez. The court affirmed the defendant's conviction for first-degree murder, attempted murder, and assault with a deadly weapon, following an independent review of the record.

Physicians for Social Responsibility v. Dept. of Toxic Substances Control - Attorney Fees

The California Court of Appeal certified for publication its decision in Physicians for Social Responsibility v. Dept. of Toxic Substances Control. The court affirmed the superior court's denial of attorney fees to the appellants, finding no abuse of discretion.

Dickerson v. Bickman - Medical Malpractice Appeal

The California Court of Appeal filed an opinion in Dickerson v. Bickman, a medical malpractice case. The court affirmed the trial court's judgment in favor of the defendants, dismissing the plaintiffs' claims of medical malpractice and fraud.

LAOSD Asbestos Cases - California Court of Appeal

The California Court of Appeal certified for publication its decision in the LAOSD Asbestos Cases, involving claims against Avon Products, Inc. The jury found Avon strictly liable for defective products and awarded over $51 million in compensatory and punitive damages.

In re J.N. - California Court of Appeal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Two, filed an opinion in the case In re J.N. The opinion affirms jurisdictional and dispositional orders concerning minors J.N. and L.N. under the Juvenile Court Law, addressing challenges to evidence sufficiency, jurisdiction, custody, and visitation orders.

Stewart v. USAA General Indemnity Co. - Appeal of Court Orders

The California Court of Appeal affirmed lower court orders in Stewart v. USAA General Indemnity Co., including an anti-SLAPP motion and a vexatious litigant declaration. The court found the appeal to be non-precedential.

People v. Shaw - Appeal Dismissed

The California Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal filed by Andre Curtis Shaw, who argued the trial court erred in denying his request for resentencing. The appellate court found that the denial of the petition did not affect Shaw's substantial rights and therefore dismissed the appeal.

Eugene F. Kelly - Transfer to Disability Inactive Status

The Minnesota Supreme Court has ordered attorney Eugene F. Kelly transferred to disability inactive status, effective February 26, 2026. This order stays pending disciplinary investigations against him, contingent on his petition for reinstatement.

Ecology Grant Expands Stewart Mountain Community Forest

The Washington State Department of Ecology awarded a $5.5 million grant to expand the Stewart Mountain Community Forest by 1,600 acres. This funding, part of the state's Streamflow Restoration Act, supports water quality, forest preservation, and community ownership of the land.

State AGs Challenge Withholding of Disaster Relief and Transportation Funding

California Attorney General Rob Bonta, along with attorneys general from three other states, is challenging the Trump Administration's threatened cuts to $900 million in transportation funding and withholding of over $1.3 billion in disaster relief funding. This action seeks to amend an existing lawsuit to include these new funding challenges.

Darci Williamson v. BR Pig, LLC - Louisiana Court of Appeal Ruling

The Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit, granted a writ in Darci Williamson v. BR Pig, LLC, reversing a trial court's denial of a summary judgment motion. The court vacated the denial, finding that the defendant met the requirements to challenge the plaintiff's claims under the Louisiana Merchant Liability Act.

B.B. v. Hochul - Child Welfare Certification Challenge

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed in part and affirmed in part a lower court's decision in B.B. v. Hochul. The court found that plaintiffs, children removed from their parents, have standing to challenge New York's certification scheme for relative foster parents, which denied certification based on criminal history or child abuse reports. The court remanded for further proceedings.

Care One LLC v NLRB - Court Opinion on Unfair Labor Practice Proceedings

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's denial of a preliminary injunction sought by Care One LLC and its affiliates. The healthcare facilities sought to halt proceedings before the NLRB, arguing the ALJ was improperly appointed and shielded from removal. The court found the plaintiffs could not demonstrate irreparable harm, thus denying the injunction.

Reidy Contracting Group v. Mt. Hawley Insurance - Additional Insured Coverage Dispute

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court ruling that Reidy Contracting Group is an additional insured under Mt. Hawley Insurance Company's excess liability policy. The court held that the Employers Liability Exclusion was ambiguous and must be construed against Mt. Hawley.

Duke v. Luxottica - ERISA Retirement Plan Class Action Opinion

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on a class action lawsuit alleging Luxottica's retirement plan violated ERISA by using outdated actuarial assumptions. The court held that the plaintiff has standing to seek plan reformation but not monetary payments to the plan, and that the effective vindication doctrine precludes mandatory arbitration of claims on behalf of the plan.

US v. Cardenas - Cocaine Import Conspiracy Conviction

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the conviction of Jay James Roldan Cardenas for conspiracy to import cocaine. The court found that the district court erred in excluding evidence crucial to Roldan's defense of lacking criminal intent, remanding the case for further proceedings.

Lanesborough 2000, LLC v. Nextres, LLC - Court Opinion on Arbitration Award

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed a district court's confirmation of an arbitration award between Lanesborough 2000, LLC and Nextres, LLC. The court found the contractual waiver of appeal rights ambiguous and affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded the case regarding an injunction of a state-court proceeding.

Broadcast Music Inc. v. North American Concert Promoters Association - Antitrust

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a district court's decision regarding music licensing fees set by Broadcast Music Inc. (BMI) for the North American Concert Promoters Association (NACPA). The court found the imposed rates and expanded definition of gross revenues to be unreasonable, remanding the case for further proceedings.

United States v. Woods - Competency to Stand Trial

The Second Circuit affirmed a district court's order extending a defendant's hospitalization beyond the initial four-month period while the government determined whether to seek civil commitment. The court clarified the application of 18 U.S.C. § 4241(d)(2)(B) in cases where a defendant is found incompetent to stand trial.

Pinilla Perez v. Bondi - Noncitizen Removal Proceedings Deadline

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals granted a petition challenging the Board of Immigration Appeals' denial of a motion to reopen removal proceedings. The court found the BIA provided insufficient reasons for denying equitable tolling of the 90-day deadline for filing such motions.

McGucken v. Shutterstock, Inc. - Copyright Infringement Appeal

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals partially affirmed and partially vacated a district court's ruling in McGucken v. Shutterstock, Inc. The court affirmed the dismissal of the false copyright management information claim but vacated the dismissal of copyright infringement claims, remanding for further proceedings.

Mar-Can Transport v. Pension Fund - ERISA Withdrawal Liability

The Second Circuit affirmed a lower court ruling that reduces Mar-Can Transport's ERISA withdrawal liability by $1.8 million. The decision clarifies the interpretation of "unfunded vested benefits" for multiemployer pension plans when an employer switches to a new union.

SBK ART LLC v. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP - Discovery for Foreign Litigation

The Second Circuit affirmed a district court's order granting SBK ART LLC's petition for discovery under 28 U.S.C. §1782 for use in foreign litigation. The court disagreed with the respondent law firm's argument that discovery should be denied if the documents are not discoverable from the foreign client abroad.

Connecticut Fair Housing Center v. CoreLogic Rental Property Solutions Opinion

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion in Connecticut Fair Housing Center v. CoreLogic Rental Property Solutions. The court vacated in part, affirmed in part, and reversed in part the district court's decision regarding claims of disparate impact discrimination under the Fair Housing Act and violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

US v. Aryeetey - Felon in Possession of Firearm Conviction Affirmed

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction and sentence of Ivan Joel Aryeetey for being a felon in possession of a firearm. The court found no abuse of discretion in admitting DNA evidence and deemed the sentence substantively reasonable.

US v Jimenez - 105 Months Prison for Felony Ammo Possession

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's sentence of 105 months imprisonment and three years of supervised release for William Jimenez, who pleaded guilty to possessing ammunition after a felony conviction. The court upheld the special conditions of supervised release, including searches of electronic devices and mandatory mental health counseling.

Safdieh v. Commissioner - Tax Court Decision Appeal

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a Tax Court decision, holding that the Commissioner of Internal Revenue may assess penalties for failure to report foreign business control. The court vacated the Tax Court's order granting summary judgment to the taxpayer and remanded the case for further proceedings.

Galette v. New Jersey Transit Corp. - Sovereign Immunity

The Supreme Court ruled that NJ Transit is not an arm of the State of New Jersey and therefore is not entitled to sovereign immunity. This decision resolves a conflict between state courts and clarifies the application of sovereign immunity to state-created entities.

Supreme Court: Substantial-Evidence Standard for Asylum Persecution Determinations

The Supreme Court ruled that courts of appeals must apply the substantial-evidence standard when reviewing the Board of Immigration Appeals' determination of whether undisputed facts constitute 'persecution' under the Immigration and Nationality Act. This decision clarifies the standard of review for asylum cases.

County of Lancaster, PA v. AFSCME District Council 89 - Labor Arbitration

The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania issued an opinion in County of Lancaster, PA v. AFSCME District Council 89, addressing whether a labor arbitration panel had jurisdiction to issue an award concerning impact bargaining due to unforeseen circumstances. The court reviewed the trial court's order denying the union's petition to vacate the arbitration award.

Protect PT & P.R. Wendell v. Twp. of Penn - Land Development Approval

The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania affirmed a lower court's decision upholding the approval of a revised land development application for an unconventional natural gas well pad. The court found that the Penn Township Board of Commissioners and the Court of Common Pleas correctly granted preliminary and final approval for EQT Artemis Production, LLC's project.

Pearson v. Pearson - Child Custody Appeal

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania reviewed a child custody order, finding that certain provisions modifying custody upon completion of requirements without a best interest determination violated the Child Custody Act. The court affirmed in part and vacated in part the lower court's order.

Com. v. Adams Diaz, S. - Non-Precedential Decision

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued a non-precedential decision in the case of Commonwealth v. Adams Diaz, S. The court affirmed the trial court's judgment of sentence after the appellant was convicted of theft by failing to make required disposition of funds. The decision addresses the denial of the appellant's motions to dismiss and for a mistrial.

Com. v. Baltimore, M., Jr. - Criminal Sentencing Appeal

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued a non-precedential opinion affirming the judgment of sentence for Michael Baltimore Jr. following the revocation of his probation. The appeal concerned the discretionary aspects of his sentencing.

Com. v. Carlton - Appeal of Firearm Statute Constitutionality

The Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a non-precedential decision in Commonwealth v. Carlton, addressing the constitutionality of firearm carrying statutes. The appellant challenged the prohibition on individuals aged 18-20 obtaining a license to carry a firearm. The court affirmed the judgment of sentence.

USITC Institutes Section 337 Investigation of Laptops, Routers, Gateways

The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has instituted a Section 337 investigation into alleged patent infringement by certain laptops, routers, gateways, and components imported into the U.S. The investigation names ASUSTeK Computer Inc., ASUS Computer International, Inc., TP-Link Systems Inc., D-Link Corporation, D-Link Systems, Inc., and Ubiquiti Inc. as respondents.

USITC Affirms Wind Tower Trade Cases from Four Countries

The USITC has affirmed existing antidumping and countervailing duty orders on utility scale wind towers from Canada, Indonesia, South Korea, and Vietnam. This decision means the current trade remedy orders will remain in place, continuing to affect imports of these products into the United States.

Washington AG Sues DOE Over TransAlta Plant Order

Washington Attorney General Nick Brown has sued the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) in federal court, seeking to overturn an order to reopen the TransAlta coal power plant in Centralia. The AG also filed a separate FOIA lawsuit alleging the DOE unlawfully withheld records related to the order.

State AG Defends Firearms Act in Lawsuit

Washington State Attorney General Nick Brown is defending the constitutionality of the state's Firearms Industry Responsibility Act (FIRA) in a King County Superior Court case, Olen v. Precise Shooter. The AG's office filed an amicus brief to support the law, which holds gun sellers responsible for preventing sales to individuals at risk of self-harm.

Marcell v. State - Post-Conviction Relief Appeal

The Idaho Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's summary dismissal of Cole Joseph Marcell's amended petition for post-conviction relief. Marcell argued the district court erred by not addressing his claim of newly discovered evidence. The court found the appeal without merit.

Florida Awards $13M for Infrastructure Development

Governor Ron DeSantis awarded over $13 million through the Florida Job Growth Grant Fund to support infrastructure development for the aerospace, aviation, and maritime industries in Panama City, Port St. Joe, and Gulf County. These funds are intended to create jobs and attract investment.

Court of Appeals opinion: State v. Jacob T. Anderson

Court of Appeals opinion: State v. Jacob T. Anderson

National Emission Standards for Marine Tank Vessel Loading Operations: Technology Review

The Environmental Protection Agency has issued a proposed rule regarding National Emission Standards for Marine Tank Vessel Loading Operations. This document initiates a technology review and is open for public comment until April 20, 2026.

EPA Proposes Texas Landfill Emissions Control Plan Approval

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed a rule to approve a state air quality plan for Texas, specifically concerning the control of emissions from existing municipal solid waste landfills. This proposal is open for public comment for 30 days.

EPA Proposes Oregon PM2.5 Redesignation to Attainment

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed the redesignation of Klamath Falls, Oregon, from nonattainment to attainment for particulate matter (PM2.5). This proposed rule includes a maintenance plan for the area. The public comment period for this proposal closes on April 3, 2026.

EPA Proposes Arizona SO2 Attainment Plan Approval

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed to approve Arizona's State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the Hayden SO2 nonattainment area. This action is being taken to ensure compliance with the 1971 and 2010 Sulfur Dioxide National Ambient Air Quality Standards. The EPA is seeking public comment on this proposed rule.

R.N. v. E.B. - Frozen Embryos Case

The Ohio Court of Appeals reviewed a case concerning the disposition of 14 frozen embryos created during a marriage. The court affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded the matter for further proceedings, indicating a modification of the lower court's order regarding embryo donation.

State v. Johnson - Ohio Appeals Court Upholds Firearm Charge Denial

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's denial of a motion to dismiss firearm charges against Lamocres Johnson. The court found that the Second Amendment permits the disarmament of dangerous individuals, upholding the denial of dismissal based on Johnson being a former felon with a weapon under a disability.

RTI Restoration Technologies Inc v. International Painters Pension Fund - Withdrawal Liability

The Third Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision barring a multi-employer pension fund from collecting withdrawal liability from successor companies. The court found the fund's delay in demanding payment was prejudicial, barring its claim under the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act (MPPAA).

Scott v. Arkansas Dept. Human Services - Parental Rights Termination

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed the termination of parental rights for Katlyn and Steven Scott concerning their minor child. The court found clear and convincing evidence supported the termination grounds and that it was in the child's best interest, despite the parents' arguments regarding support for the findings and potential relative placement.

Fard Muhammad v. State of Arkansas - Criminal Appeal

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed a misdemeanor conviction for third-degree battery against Fard Muhammad. The court found that Muhammad knowingly and intelligently waived his right to counsel, despite his limited education and self-representation.

Alberto Dominguez v. State of Arkansas - Criminal Appeal

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed a conviction for thirty counts of possession of child sexual abuse material. The court also remanded the case to correct the sentencing order. The appeal challenged the sufficiency of evidence and the denial of motions to suppress.

Ryan Michael Douglas v. State of Arkansas - Criminal Appeal

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision to revoke Ryan Michael Douglas's suspended imposition of sentence. Douglas was sentenced to three years imprisonment and a suspended imposition of sentence on one case, and a four-year suspended imposition of sentence on another.

Chase Browning-Langstaff v. State of Arkansas - Criminal Appeal

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed a conviction for second-degree murder. The appellant was sentenced to six years imprisonment. The court found sufficient evidence despite the appellant's claim of self-defense.

Jonathan Hitchcock v. State of Arkansas - Criminal Appeal

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed a conviction for rape and sexual assault against Jonathan Hitchcock. The court addressed issues regarding late-disclosed expert testimony, a denied motion for continuance, amendment of charges during trial, and the admission of evidence.

Bahner v. Wakefield - Guardianship Appeal

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision granting permanent guardianship of minor children to Susan Wakefield. The appellant, Daniel Bahner, argued the court erred by not finding him unfit before granting guardianship, but the appellate court found no error.

April Bradley v. Arkansas Dept. Human Services - Parental Rights Termination

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's order terminating April Bradley's parental rights to her son. The court granted the motion to withdraw filed by Bradley's counsel, agreeing that there were no meritorious grounds for appeal. The case originated from allegations of child endangerment and injury.

Ortiz v. Bagley - Child Custody Appeal

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision denying a mother's request to change child custody. The mother argued a material change in circumstances, but the court found insufficient evidence to support her claims for increased possession time.

Dequon Israel v. State of Arkansas - Juvenile Transfer Appeal

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision denying a juvenile's motion to transfer his capital murder and aggravated robbery charges to juvenile court. The court considered the appellant's age, the nature of the crimes, and his juvenile history.

David Fulmer v. Director, Division of Workforce Services - Appeal of Overpayment Decision

The Arkansas Court of Appeals reversed and remanded a decision by the Arkansas Board of Review concerning David Fulmer's unemployment benefits. The Board had dismissed Fulmer's appeal as untimely, but the court found the Board erred by treating a waiver request as an appeal from a prior decision. The case is remanded for the Board to address Fulmer's waiver request.

Madiha Shahid v. Asif Masood - Divorce Case Opinion

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed in part and reversed and remanded in part a divorce decree concerning child support, alimony, and custody. The court also affirmed the lower court's findings on contempt and joint custody.

Dedrick Brigance v. State of Arkansas - Criminal Appeal

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Dedrick Brigance for second-degree murder with a firearm enhancement. Brigance appealed, arguing insufficient evidence and error in jury instructions regarding the state's stand-your-ground law.

Sullivan et al. v. Richardson - Qualified Immunity Appeal

The Court of Appeals of Arkansas reversed and remanded a lower court's decision denying a motion for summary judgment and qualified immunity for law enforcement officers and the City of Little Rock. The court found that material issues of fact did not preclude qualified immunity for the officers.

Oberlander v. Oberlander - Appeal of Summary Judgment

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision granting summary judgment in favor of David Oberlander and Conway Neurology, P.A., dismissing claims of tort-of-outrage and invasion of privacy. The case involved the disclosure of medical records in a child support dispute.

Westside Loft Apartment v. Tina Fowler - Court Opinion

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed a judgment against Westside Loft Apartments in a case involving a dog attack and subsequent eviction dispute. The court addressed arguments regarding necessary parties, discovery sanctions, and damages.

Arkansas Dept. of Human Services v. Conduent State - Procurement Dispute

The Arkansas Court of Appeals reversed and remanded a lower court's declaratory judgment against the Arkansas Department of Human Services (DHS) and its procurement director. The court found that the judgment was entered before the appellants' response time had expired, impacting a state contract award for electronic benefits transfer (EBT) services.

People v. Taveres - Sex Offender Classification

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York affirmed an order adjudicating Rolando Taveres a level two sexually violent offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act. The court found sufficient evidence for the risk assessment and declined to grant a downward departure.

Jerbrea Hanson v. State - Transfer of Case

The Georgia Court of Appeals has transferred two cases, Jerbrea Hanson v. The State and Ananda Dennis v. The State, to the Supreme Court. The transfer is due to constitutional challenges raised in the cases, which fall under the Supreme Court's exclusive jurisdiction.

Howell v. Kimberly Associates II, LP - Case Dismissed

The Court of Appeals of Georgia dismissed the case of Howell v. Kimberly Associates II, LP. The dismissal was due to the appellant's failure to follow the proper procedure for discretionary review after a state court dismissed their petition for review.

Service Complete LLC v. Oxlt LLC - Contract Dispute Affirmation

The Georgia Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's dismissal of a breach of contract claim filed by Service Complete, LLC against OXL,T LLC. The dismissal was based on the contract's conflict with Georgia statutes regulating public adjusters.

Maddison Freeman v. Boys and Girls Club of Bulloch County, Inc. - Appeal Dismissed

The Court of Appeals of Georgia dismissed the appeal of Maddison Freeman in the case Maddison Freeman v. Boys and Girls Club of Bulloch County, Inc. The dismissal was due to the appellant's failure to file her brief and enumerations of error by the court-ordered deadline.

Brenda M. Bush v. Shirley Randolph - Discretionary Appeal Dismissed

The Court of Appeals of Georgia dismissed Brenda M. Bush's discretionary appeal in the case of Bush v. Randolph. The dismissal was due to the application being filed untimely, nine days after the superior court's judgment, violating the seven-day jurisdictional deadline for dispossessory actions.

Rodriguez v. Georgia Dept. of Corrections - Case Dismissed

The Court of Appeals of Georgia dismissed the appeal of Hjalmar Rodriguez Jr. v. Georgia Department of Corrections. The dismissal was based on two grounds: the appeal was untimely filed, and it failed to comply with the discretionary review procedure required for prisoner civil actions under the Prison Litigation Reform Act.

Patel v. Eager Holdings, LLC - Declaratory Judgment Action

The Court of Appeals of Georgia reversed a lower court's decision in Patel v. Eager Holdings, LLC, finding that the declaratory judgment action did not present justiciable issues. The court reversed the order that granted summary judgment to the plaintiffs and declared Monica Patel no longer a member of the company.

Franklin v. Norman - Georgia Court of Appeals Vacates and Remands

The Georgia Court of Appeals vacated and remanded a trial court's decision in Franklin v. Norman, finding that the trial court erred in failing to award quadruple damages against an expert witness for bad faith fee seeking. The court directed the trial court to impose these damages.

Duane Allen Jenkins v. ABM Industries, Inc. - Case Dismissed

The Court of Appeals of Georgia dismissed the appeal of Duane Allen Jenkins v. ABM Industries, Inc. The dismissal was due to the appellant filing the notice of appeal 33 days after the trial court's order, exceeding the statutory 30-day limit. This lack of timely filing means the court lacks jurisdiction.

Girls Galore Inc. v. City of Atlanta - Case Vacated

The Court of Appeals of Georgia vacated and remanded a Fulton County Superior Court order that affirmed the City of Atlanta's revocation of Girls Galore Inc.'s alcohol license. The court found potential due process violations and improper application of penalty schemes.

Marquet Antonio Flowers v. Crystal Lashun Flowers - Dismissed Case

The Court of Appeals of Georgia dismissed the direct appeal in Marquet Antonio Flowers v. Crystal Lashun Flowers due to failure to follow the mandatory discretionary appeal procedure. The case involved a divorce decree.

Mikai Minter-King v. State - Plea Agreement Enforcement

The Georgia Court of Appeals reversed a trial court's decision denying a motion to enforce a plea agreement. The appellate court found that the defendant accepted the initial plea offer, which could not be unilaterally altered by a subsequent prosecutor.

Glenwood Motel Enterprise, Inc. v. Lewayne Martin - Interlocutory Application Granted

The Court of Appeals of Georgia granted an interlocutory application in the case of Glenwood Motel Enterprise, Inc. v. Lewayne Martin. The appellant has been granted 10 days from the order date to file a notice of appeal.

Shane Yerdon v. State - Criminal Law

The Georgia Court of Appeals affirmed a jury's guilty verdict for Shane Yerdon, rejecting his plea of not guilty by reason of insanity. The court found no reversible error in the trial counsel's handling of the prosecutor's comments regarding the consequences of an insanity verdict.

USTR Releases 2025 Review of Notorious Markets

The Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) has released its 2025 Review of Notorious Markets for Counterfeiting and Piracy. The report identifies 37 online and 32 physical markets that engage in trademark counterfeiting or copyright piracy, highlighting trends and challenges in intellectual property theft.

Andrew Sorial Agrees to Cease Practicing Medicine

The Massachusetts Board of Registration in Medicine has entered into a voluntary agreement with physician Andrew L. Sorial, M.D., to cease practicing medicine in the Commonwealth. This agreement is non-disciplinary but will be reported to national data banks.

CapexMD LLC Consent Order for Unlicensed Small Loans

The Connecticut Department of Banking issued a consent order against CapexMD LLC for making unlicensed small loans to 41 Connecticut borrowers. CapexMD agreed to pay a civil penalty and restitution without admitting wrongdoing.

Rios v. Guevara - Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law

This document is a plaintiff's memorandum of law filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The plaintiff seeks a judgment as a matter of law against defendant Reynaldo Guevara on specific issues related to alleged assault and concealment of information from prosecutors.

Rios v. Guevara - Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law

Defendant Guevara has filed a Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law in the case of Rios v. Guevara, N.D. Illinois. The motion argues that the plaintiff failed to present sufficient evidence for a jury to rule in his favor on several claims, including Fabrication of Confidential Informants and Malicious Prosecution.

Nisbet v. Willowbrook Ford, Inc. - Age Discrimination and Retaliatory Discharge

The District Court for the Northern District of Illinois issued a memorandum opinion and order in Bennet Nisbet v. Willowbrook Ford, Inc. The court granted in part and denied in part the defendant's motion for summary judgment concerning claims of age discrimination and retaliatory discharge. The case is docketed as 1:23-cv-14242.

United Fuel Corporation Enforcement Action

The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality has proposed an enforcement action against United Fuel Corporation for violations of the State Water Control Law at its Oaklawn Shell facility in Hopewell, Virginia. A comment period for the proposed Consent Order is open from March 4, 2026, to April 3, 2026.

NHTSA Proposes ADS/ADAS Incident Reporting Rules

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has issued a notice and request for comment regarding proposed incident reporting rules for Automated Driving Systems (ADS) and Level 2 Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS). The comment period is open for 61 days.

NYSDOL Opens New Lower Manhattan Career Center

The New York State Department of Labor (NYSDOL) has opened a new Lower Manhattan Career Center. The center will provide job seekers with career assistance, workshops, resume help, and training programs, while also supporting local businesses in building a skilled workforce.

Presidential Message on Alexander Graham Bell's Legacy

The White House issued a presidential message honoring Alexander Graham Bell on his birthday, celebrating his legacy in communication and innovation. The message reaffirms the administration's commitment to advancing next-generation technologies and securing technological dominance.

Presidential Message on Women's History Month

The White House issued a presidential message celebrating American women's achievements for Women's History Month. The message highlights historical and contemporary female figures and reaffirms the administration's commitment to policies that support women and families.

Court affirms arbitration award for NetApp on employee labor law claims

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court's decision to confirm an arbitration award in favor of NetApp, Inc. The employee, Alexander Sorokuno, had sued NetApp for alleged labor law violations and sought civil penalties under the Private Attorneys General Act. The court found that the arbitration award conclusively determined the employee's lack of standing for his PAGA claim.

Johnson v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal Affirmed

The District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the lower court's decision in Ivan Thomas Johnson v. State of Florida. The appellate court issued its opinion on March 3, 2026, with docket number 6D2024-1341. The disposition was 'Affirmed'.

Craig Demonte Griffin v. State of Florida - Affirmation of Ruling

The District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed a ruling in the case of Craig Demonte Griffin v. State of Florida. The case, with docket number 5D2025-1880, involved an appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. The disposition of the appeal was an affirmation of the lower court's decision.

Curtis L. Duhart v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal

The District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the lower court's decision in the case of Curtis L. Duhart v. State of Florida. The appeal, docketed as 5D2025-3143, concerned a criminal matter. The court's disposition was 'Affirmed'.

Donald Ray Willett, Jr. v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision in the case of Donald Ray Willett, Jr. v. State of Florida. The appellate court's disposition was 'Affirmed', indicating no change to the original ruling.

Bryan Pike v. State of Florida - Affirmation of Lower Court Ruling

The Sixth District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the lower tribunal's ruling in Bryan Pike v. State of Florida. The case, with docket number 6D2023-2252, involved an appeal from a lower tribunal case number 2009-CF-744. The disposition of the appeal was 'Affirmed'.

Mills v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision in Mills v. State of Florida. The appellate court's disposition was 'Affirmed,' indicating no change to the original ruling. The case involves a criminal appeal.

Arif M. Khan and Anila Arif v. Chelsea Oaks at Lake Saunders Homeowners Association, Inc. - Appellate Court Opinion

The Fifth District Court of Appeal of Florida issued an opinion in the case of Arif M. Khan and Anila Arif v. Chelsea Oaks at Lake Saunders Homeowners Association, Inc. The court affirmed the lower court's decision. The docket number for this case is 5D2024-3267.

Gary Baker v. State of Florida - Affirmation of Opinion

The District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the lower tribunal's decision in Gary Baker v. State of Florida. The case, identified by docket number 6D2023-2427, involved an appeal by Gary Baker against the State of Florida. The court's disposition was a final affirmation of the prior ruling.

Delaney v. State of Florida - Appellate Affirmance

The First District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the lower court's decision in Delaney v. State of Florida. The appellate court issued its disposition on March 3, 2026, with no further details on the specific legal arguments or outcomes provided in this summary.

Laws v. State of Florida - Affirmation of Lower Court Ruling

The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower tribunal's decision in the case of Frank L. Laws v. State of Florida. The appeal was filed under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2). The disposition of the case was affirmed.

Davidson v. Adams - Florida District Court of Appeal Opinion

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court's decision in Davidson v. Adams, Estate of Casimir Adams. The appellate court issued its opinion on March 3, 2026, with docket number 1D2024-1663.

Dorsey Jr. v. State of Florida - Appellate Court Opinion

The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court's decision in the case of Dorsey Jr. v. State of Florida. The appellate court issued its opinion on March 3, 2026, with docket number 1D2025-0642.

C.E.T., III v. State of Florida - Appellate Case Affirmation

The Sixth District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the lower tribunal's decision in C.E.T., III v. State of Florida. The case, bearing docket number 6D2024-0358, involved an appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County. The disposition of the appeal was an affirmation of the lower court's ruling.

Frank v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal

The Fifth District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the lower court's decision in the case of Caisy A. Frank v. State of Florida. The appeal, docketed as 5D2024-0388, concerned a criminal matter from Flagler County. The court's disposition was an affirmation of the original ruling.

Duckworth v. Cornwell - Florida District Court of Appeal Opinion

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court's decision in the case of Margaret Duckworth v. William C. Cornwell and True Vine Landscaping. The appellate court issued its opinion on March 3, 2026, with docket number 5D2024-3394.

Jessie Joseph v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal

The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower tribunal's decision in the case of Jessie Joseph v. State of Florida and Ricky Dixon, Secretary of the Department of Corrections. The appeal concerned a lower tribunal case with docket number 24-563CA.

Lane v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal Affirmance

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision in Lane v. State of Florida. The appellate court's disposition was 'Affirmed' for docket number 1D2025-0711. This ruling pertains to a criminal appeal.

Neil Guy Callahan v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal

The District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the lower court's decision in the case of Neil Guy Callahan v. State of Florida. The appeal, docketed as 6D2024-0092, was decided on March 3, 2026, with the disposition being 'Affirmed'.

Kovar Law Group v. Hoyt, Tower Hill Select Insurance Co. - Appeal Decision

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court's decision in the case of Kovar Law Group v. Hoyt, Tower Hill Select Insurance Co. The court's disposition was 'Affirmed' with no further details provided in this summary document.

Menezes v Pachigalla - Appellate Court Opinion

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision in Menezes v. Pachigalla. The opinion, issued on March 3, 2026, pertains to case number 5D2024-2915.

Lesters Painting v. Peraza - Court of Appeals Opinion

The Washington Court of Appeals Division II has issued an opinion in the case of Lesters Painting, Llc, Respondent v. Carl Peraza And Susan Peraza, Appellants. The opinion was filed on November 4, 2025, and pertains to an appeal from the Clark Superior Court.

Erin Peters v. Holly Kenner - Court Opinion

The Washington State Court of Appeals Division III filed an opinion in the case of Erin Peters v. Holly Kenner on March 3, 2026. The opinion is related to an appeal from the Adams Superior Court, with a judgment date of July 26, 2024.

State v. Jung Jung, Jr - Court of Appeals Opinion

The Washington Court of Appeals Division II has issued an opinion in the case of State of Washington v. Jung Jung, Jr. The opinion, filed on March 3, 2026, relates to an appeal from Pierce County Superior Court. This is an unpublished opinion and should not be cited.

State v. Deborah K. Blackburn - Court of Appeals Opinion

The Washington Court of Appeals Division II has issued an opinion in the case of State of Washington v. Deborah K. Blackburn. The opinion was filed on March 3, 2026, and pertains to an appeal from Grays Harbor County Superior Court.

Guardianship Of B.r. And I.r. - Court of Appeals Opinion

The Washington Court of Appeals Division II filed an unpublished opinion in the case Guardianship Of B.r. And I.r. The case involves an appeal from a Grays Harbor County Superior Court judgment or order. The opinion was authored by Judge Bernard Veljacic.

State v. Swecker - Court of Appeals Opinion

The Washington Court of Appeals Division III has issued an opinion in the case of State of Washington v. Nicholas A. Swecker, with docket number 40365-3. The opinion was filed on March 3, 2026, and concerns an appeal from the Spokane Superior Court.

P.s.c., Inc. v. Purdys Public House, Llc - Appeal Opinion

The Washington Court of Appeals Division II has filed an opinion in the case P.s.c., Inc. v. Purdys Public House, Llc, Et Al. The case involves an appeal from a Pierce County Superior Court judgment. The opinion was filed on March 3, 2026.

State v. Stewart-Toliver - Criminal Appeal Opinion

The Washington Court of Appeals Division III has filed an opinion in the case of State of Washington v. Martel L. Stewart-Toliver. The opinion was filed on March 3, 2026, under docket number 40518-4. This filing represents the court's decision on the appeal.

Estate of Carol M. Carey - Estate Law

The Washington Court of Appeals Division III has issued an opinion in the matter of the Estate of Carol M. Carey. The opinion was filed on March 3, 2026, under docket number 40344-1, stemming from an appeal from Benton Superior Court.

State v. Ross - Criminal Appeal

The Washington Court of Appeals has issued an opinion in the case of State v. Ross, with a file date of March 3, 2026. This is an unpublished opinion and should not be cited per GR 14.1(a). The case involves an appeal from Pierce County Superior Court.

Jason Robert Garcia v. State of Washington - Personal Restraint Petition

The Washington Court of Appeals Division II has issued an unpublished opinion regarding a Personal Restraint Petition filed by Jason Robert Garcia. The opinion was filed on March 3, 2026, and pertains to a case originating from Pierce County Superior Court.

State of Washington v. Gary Brandon Ault - Court of Appeals Opinion

The Washington State Court of Appeals has issued an opinion in the case of State of Washington v. Gary Brandon Ault. The opinion was authored by Judge Robert Lawrence-Berrey and filed on March 3, 2026. This document represents the court's final decision on the matter.

Apartment Management Consultants Llc v. State Dept. Of Revenue - Tax Dispute

The Washington Court of Appeals issued an opinion in the case of Apartment Management Consultants Llc v. State Dept. Of Revenue. The court's decision addresses a tax dispute, with the file date for the opinion being November 12, 2025.

Chicago Title Insurance v State Revenue - Court of Appeals Opinion

The Washington Court of Appeals has issued an opinion in the case of Chicago Title Insurance v. State Revenue. The case involves an appeal from a Thurston Superior Court judgment, with the file date for the opinion being March 3, 2026.

Ninth Circuit Opinion on Corporate Authority and Jurisdiction in Bankruptcy

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion concerning corporate authority and jurisdiction in a bankruptcy case involving Parks Diversified, L.P. The opinion addresses appeals related to the debtor and various holding companies and individuals. The case consolidates multiple appeals concerning these issues.

Ninth Circuit: Bankruptcy Petition Without Corporate Authority Not Jurisdictional

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a bankruptcy petition filed without proper corporate authority is not a jurisdictional defect. This decision clarifies the requirements for filing bankruptcy and impacts how courts handle such cases. The ruling addresses appeals related to bankruptcy proceedings involving Parks Diversified, L.P.

Ninth Circuit: Bankruptcy Court Jurisdiction Upheld Despite Lack of Corporate Authority

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld bankruptcy court jurisdiction in a case involving Parks Diversified, L.P., despite questions regarding corporate authority. The ruling clarifies jurisdictional boundaries in complex bankruptcy proceedings.

Parks Diversified, L.P. v. Forsythe - Bankruptcy Jurisdiction Appeal

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion in the bankruptcy case of In re: Parks Diversified, L.P. v. Forsythe. The appeal concerns issues of bankruptcy jurisdiction, corporate authority, and judicial efficiency. The court's decision addresses the scope of bankruptcy court powers and the procedural handling of complex corporate bankruptcies.

Ninth Circuit: Bankruptcy Court Retains Jurisdiction Despite Unauthorized Petition

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a bankruptcy court retained jurisdiction over a case despite the filing of an unauthorized petition. This decision clarifies jurisdictional boundaries in bankruptcy proceedings involving complex corporate structures and multiple related entities.

Ninth Circuit Opinion: Bankruptcy Jurisdiction and Corporate Authority

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion regarding subject-matter jurisdiction and corporate authority in a bankruptcy case involving Parks Diversified, L.P. The court addressed multiple appeals related to the dismissal of certain claims and the scope of corporate authority in bankruptcy proceedings.

Pinilla Perez v. Bondi - Noncitizen Removal Proceedings Deadline

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals granted a petition challenging the Board of Immigration Appeals' denial of a motion to reopen removal proceedings. The court found the BIA provided insufficient reasons for denying equitable tolling of the 90-day deadline for filing such motions.

US v. Cardenas - Court of Appeals Opinion

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the conviction of Jey James Roldan Cardenas for conspiracy to import cocaine. The court found that the district court erred in excluding evidence relevant to Cardenas's state of mind, potentially impacting his defense.

Lanesborough 2000 LLC v. Nextres LLC - Court Opinion

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals decided Lanesborough 2000 LLC v. Nextres LLC, affirming in part and vacating in part a district court's judgment on an arbitration award. The court found the contractual waiver of the right to appeal ambiguous and remanded the case for further proceedings regarding an injunction of a state-court action.

Broadcast Music v. North American Concert Promoters - Antitrust Licensing Fees

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a district court's decision regarding music licensing fees set by Broadcast Music, Inc. (BMI) for the North American Concert Promoters Association (NACPA). The court found the district court imposed unreasonable rates and an expanded definition of gross revenues, remanding the case for further proceedings.

Care One LLC v. NLRB - Court Opinion on Unfair Labor Practice Proceedings

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's denial of a preliminary injunction sought by Care One LLC and its affiliates. The healthcare facilities sought to halt NLRB proceedings, arguing the ALJ was unlawfully appointed and protected from removal. The court found the plaintiffs could not demonstrate irreparable harm.

24-149_opn.pdf

24-149_opn.pdf

US v. Woods - Competency to Stand Trial Ruling

The Second Circuit affirmed a district court's order extending a defendant's hospitalization beyond the initial four-month period for competency restoration. The ruling clarifies the application of 18 U.S.C. § 4241(d)(2)(B) regarding continued hospitalization when a defendant is found incompetent to stand trial.

Duke v. Luxottica - ERISA Retirement Plan Class Action

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on an ERISA class action against Luxottica, concerning allegations of outdated actuarial assumptions in calculating retirement plan benefits. The court affirmed the plaintiff's standing for plan reformation but reversed the monetary payment claim, and held that the effective vindication doctrine precludes mandatory arbitration for claims on behalf of the plan.

McGucken v. Shutterstock, Inc. - Copyright Infringement Appeal

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed in part and vacated in part a district court's ruling in McGucken v. Shutterstock, Inc. The court affirmed the dismissal of the false copyright management information claim but vacated the dismissal of copyright infringement claims, remanding for further proceedings.

Reidy Contracting Group vs Mt. Hawley Insurance - Insurance Coverage Dispute

The Second Circuit affirmed a district court ruling that Mt. Hawley Insurance Company must provide additional insured coverage to Reidy Contracting Group. The court found Reidy to be an additional insured under Mt. Hawley's excess liability policy issued to subcontractor Vanquish Contracting Corporation, and that the Employers Liability Exclusion did not bar coverage due to ambiguity.

SBK ART LLC v. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP - Discovery for Foreign Litigation

The Second Circuit affirmed a district court's order granting SBK ART LLC's petition for discovery under 28 U.S.C. §1782 for use in foreign litigation. The court disagreed with Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP's argument that discovery should be denied if not discoverable from the foreign client.

Mar-Can Transport v. Local 854 Pension Fund - ERISA Withdrawal Liability

The Second Circuit affirmed a lower court's decision, reducing Mar-Can Transportation Company's withdrawal liability from the Local 854 Pension Fund by $1.8 million. The ruling interprets an ERISA provision concerning asset and liability transfers when an employer changes union representation.

CFHC v. CoreLogic Rental Property Solutions - Fair Housing Act and FCRA

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on a case involving alleged violations of the Fair Housing Act and the Fair Credit Reporting Act by CoreLogic Rental Property Solutions. The court vacated in part, affirmed in part, and reversed in part the district court's decision, impacting how rental screening practices are evaluated under these laws.

United States v. Jimenez - Sentencing Appeal

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's sentencing of William Jimenez to 105 months imprisonment and three years of supervised release. Jimenez appealed three special conditions of his supervised release, but the court found they were adequately supported by the record.

US v. Aryeetey - Felon in Possession of Firearm Conviction Affirmed

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction and sentence of Ivan Joel Aryeetey for being a felon in possession of a firearm. The court found no abuse of discretion in admitting DNA evidence and deemed the sentence substantively reasonable.

Safdieh v. Commissioner - Tax Penalties

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a Tax Court decision, holding that the Commissioner of Internal Revenue may assess penalties for failing to report foreign business control. The court vacated the lower court's order and remanded the case for further proceedings.

USA v. Boylan - Criminal Case Opinion

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the conviction of Jerry Boylan, former captain of the M.V. Conception, for seaman's manslaughter. The court held that 18 U.S.C. § 1115 requires negligence, not gross negligence, and found any error in jury instructions to be harmless.

USA v. Boylan - Manslaughter Conviction Affirmed

The Ninth Circuit affirmed Jerry Boylan's conviction for seaman's manslaughter related to the Conception fire that killed 34 people. The court held that 18 U.S.C. § 1115 requires negligence, not gross negligence, and found any error in jury instructions to be harmless.

Colorado Bill Allows Online Publication of Legal Notices

Colorado bill HB26-1095, introduced for the 2026 Regular Session, proposes to allow certain local governments the discretion to publish legal notices online instead of in physical print newspapers. The online publication must be free to access.

Colorado Bill Increases DRIVES Account Funding

Colorado Bill HB26-1102 proposes to increase funding for the Colorado DRIVES vehicle services account by redirecting portions of late vehicle registration fees and introducing new fees for missed appointments. These changes are set to take effect at various points between July 2026 and July 2027.

Colorado Statewide Homelessness Strategy and Local Authorities Bill

Colorado Bill HB26-1202 requires the Department of Local Affairs to propose a statewide homelessness strategy by January 2027. It also allows local governments to form multijurisdictional homelessness authorities and use documentary fees for affordable housing.

Colorado Bill: Improve Customer Use of Distributed Energy Resources

Colorado Bill HB26-1007 aims to improve customer use of distributed energy resources by defining portable-scale solar generation devices and prohibiting utilities from requiring prior approval for their installation or use. The bill mandates that commission-regulated utilities, as well as municipally owned utilities and cooperative electric associations, must allow customer ownership and use of meter collar adapters and prohibit production meters as an interconnection condition for customer-sited distributed energy resources.

Colorado Bill Protects Vulnerable Adults from Financial Exploitation

Colorado Bill HB26-1110, the ASSET Act, requires financial institutions to report suspected financial exploitation of vulnerable adults to law enforcement and may authorize delays in disbursements. The bill aims to protect eligible adults from financial exploitation by financial institutions.

Colorado Bill on Maternal Health Equity and Continuing Education

Colorado's HB26-1044 mandates measures to improve Black maternal health equity, including continuing education for obstetric professionals, public display of respectful maternity care principles, and enhanced reporting of severe maternal morbidity or death incidents. The bill introduces penalties for discriminatory or negligent misconduct by healthcare facilities and practitioners.

Colorado Combative Sports Office Continuation and Terminology Update

Colorado Bill HB26-1194 continues the office of combative sports and commission until 2037, updating terminology and safety data collection requirements. The bill also modifies disciplinary grounds and introduces new financial interest restrictions for promoters, matchmakers, and managers.

Homeless Prevention Activities Program Restructure

Colorado Bill HB26-1192 proposes restructuring the homeless prevention activities program. The bill would eliminate the program's advisory committee and grant the division of housing enhanced administrative and enforcement powers over program standards and fund allocation.

Colorado Bill Expands Illicit Massage Business Definition

Colorado HB26-1257 proposes to expand the definition of an "illicit massage business" to include businesses engaging in crimes beyond human-trafficking-related offenses. The bill also removes restrictions on local governments regarding licensing requirements and allows for additional grounds to deny, revoke, or suspend licenses.

Colorado Designates Emergency Medical Services as Essential Services

Colorado Bill HB26-1238 proposes to designate emergency medical services, including ambulance and air ambulance services, as essential services within the state. The bill aims to integrate these services into public safety systems and outlines provisions for reimbursement and funding from state accounts.

Colorado Bill HB26-1134: Right to Counsel in Municipal Courts

Colorado Bill HB26-1134 aims to ensure municipal court defendants have the same right to counsel as state court defendants. The bill clarifies defense counsel's rights and prohibits flat-fee payment structures for indigent defense in municipalities prosecuting domestic violence cases. It also mandates open proceedings and prompt case resolution.

Colorado Bill Requires Baby Diaper Changing Stations in Public Restrooms

Colorado Bill HB26-1130 requires buildings with public restrooms to install baby diaper changing stations by July 1, 2027. Building owners must ensure stations are safe, sanitary, and clearly signed, with exceptions for historic structures or accessibility conflicts.

Colorado Affordable Home Ownership Program Bill Update

Colorado bill SB26-040 proposes changes to the state's affordable home ownership program. Key amendments include clarifying income eligibility requirements for housing units and allowing modifications to monthly housing cost percentages under certain conditions. The bill also addresses local affordability mechanisms and potential rental of program units.

Colorado Bill Reduces Collective Bargaining Barriers

Colorado HB26-1005 proposes amendments to the "Labor Peace Act" to reduce barriers to collective bargaining negotiations. Key changes include clarifying mandatory subjects of bargaining and eliminating the requirement for a second election for union security agreements. The bill aims to promote good faith negotiations between employers and employees.

Commerce: L-lysine from China Antidumping Duty Investigation Preliminary Determination

The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a preliminary affirmative determination in the antidumping duty investigation of L-lysine from China. The investigation found weighted-average dumping margins ranging from 41.22% to 72.18% for various Chinese producers and exporters.

Commerce Final Affirmative Determination on Steel Bar from Algeria

The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a final affirmative determination in the antidumping duty investigation of steel concrete reinforcing bar from Algeria. The weighted-average dumping margin for Tosyali Iron Steel Industry Algeria SPA and all-others is 127.32%. The International Trade Commission will make a concurrent injury determination.

National Consumer Protection Week Announced by DORA

The Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies (DORA) announced its participation in National Consumer Protection Week, observed March 1-7, 2026. DORA and its nine divisions will highlight consumer awareness and education campaigns to inform Coloradans about available resources.

PlayOn Sports Fined $1.10M for Privacy Violations

The California Privacy Protection Agency has fined PlayOn Sports $1.10 million for privacy violations related to student data and targeted advertising. The company must also change its data collection and opt-out practices.

Avila v. Meta Platforms Inc. - Personal Injury Product Liability

A new product liability lawsuit, Avila v. Meta Platforms Inc., was filed on March 3, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves personal injury claims against Meta Platforms Inc. and other defendants.

Randolph v. Veev Group, Inc. et al - Labor: Other

A new civil case, Randolph v. Veev Group, Inc. et al, was filed on March 3, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a Notice of Removal from Alameda Superior Court and concerns Labor: Other. The initial filing fee was $405.

H. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. - Personal Injury Product Liability

A new civil case, H. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al., was filed on March 3, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves claims of personal injury and product liability against Uber Technologies, Inc. and its affiliates.

Roe CL 284 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. - Personal Injury Product Liability

A new civil case, Roe CL 284 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al, was filed on March 3, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case is based on diversity jurisdiction and involves claims of personal injury and product liability. The initial filings include a complaint and proposed summons.

Monterey Waterkeeper v. County of Santa Cruz - Environmental Matters

Monterey Waterkeeper has filed a complaint against the County of Santa Cruz in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, identified by case number 5:26-cv-01827, concerns environmental matters and was filed on March 3, 2026.

Pfister v. Costco Wholesale Corporation - Civil Case Filing

A civil case, Pfister v. Costco Wholesale Corporation, was filed on March 3, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case was removed from the Superior Court of California, Contra Costa County, by Costco Wholesale Corporation.

Drayden v. United States of America - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, Drayden v. United States of America, was filed on March 3, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a complaint filed by Craig M. Drayden against the United States of America. The filing fee was $405.

Tello Jr. v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A. - Consumer Credit Case

Alvaro Tello, Jr. has filed a civil case against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, identified by docket number 4:26-cv-01810, is based on federal question jurisdiction and concerns consumer credit.

C.G. v. United States - Civil Rights Case

A civil rights case, C.G. v. United States of America et al., was filed on March 3, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a complaint against U.S. Government defendants and includes a motion to proceed under a pseudonym.

Y.B. v. United States - Civil Rights Case

A new civil rights case, Y.B. v. United States of America et al, was filed on March 3, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, bearing number 4:26-cv-01817, involves the U.S. Government as a defendant.

A. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. - Product Liability Lawsuit

A product liability lawsuit has been filed against Uber Technologies, Inc. The case, filed on March 3, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, alleges personal injury. This filing initiates the legal process for the plaintiff against the defendant.

E.G. v. United States - Civil Rights Case

A new civil rights case, E.G. v. United States, was filed on March 3, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a U.S. Government defendant and is being handled under case number 4:26-cv-01825. The plaintiff, E.G., has requested to proceed under a pseudonym.

Mamaduru et al v. Edlow et al - Immigration Case Filing

A new civil case, Mamaduru et al v. Edlow et al (Case Number: 5:26-cv-01820), was filed on March 3, 2026, against USCIS and Joseph B. Edlow. The case involves 'Other Immigration Actions' and includes a complaint with exhibits related to Form I-526E and visa bulletins.

T.K. v. Lyft, Inc. - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, T.K. v. Lyft, Inc., was filed on March 3, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case is a civil action based on diversity jurisdiction with a nature of suit for personal injury. A recent filing includes a conditional transfer order from an MDL.

K.S. v. Lyft Inc et al - Civil Case

A new civil case, K.S. v. Lyft Inc et al, has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, bearing number 3:26-cv-01833-RFL, was filed on March 3, 2026, under diversity jurisdiction.

Gutierrez et al v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company et al - ERISA Civil Case

A new civil case, Gutierrez et al v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company et al, was filed on March 3, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a complaint filed under ERISA against Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company and Global Medical Response Inc.

Hernandez et al v. State Farm General Insurance Company - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, Hernandez et al v. State Farm General Insurance Company, was filed on March 3, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case number is 5:26-cv-01831 and the filing fee was $405.

Kapila v. Selene Finance LP et al - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, Kapila v. Selene Finance LP et al, has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, bearing number 4:26-cv-01840, was filed on March 3, 2026, with a complaint related to real property.

United Flow Technologies et al v. Coholan - Defend Trade Secrets Act

A new civil case, United Flow Technologies Intermediate Holdco II, LLC et al v. Coholan, was filed on March 3, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case is based on the Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016.

Kodali v. Edlow et al - Civil Immigration Case

A civil immigration case, Kodali v. Edlow et al, was filed on March 3, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a 'Other Immigration Actions' nature of suit and is brought against Joseph B. Edlow and the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services.

Tummalacherla v. Edlow et al - Immigration Actions

A new civil case, Tummalacherla v. Edlow et al, was filed on March 3, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves 'Other Immigration Actions' with the U.S. Government as a defendant. The initial filing includes a complaint and proposed summons.

A.G. v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al - Civil Case Filing

A civil case titled A.G. v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al was filed on March 3, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, assigned number 4:26-cv-01835-YGR, involves a conditional transfer order for coordinated pretrial proceedings.

V. G. v. Lyft Inc et al - Personal Injury Product Liability

A new civil case, V. G. v. Lyft Inc et al, was filed on March 3, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves personal injury and product liability claims. A related filing on February 25, 2026, conditionally transferred the case to the Northern District of California as part of MDL 3171 concerning Lyft, Inc. Passenger Sexual Assault Litigation.

Andrade v. Attorney General of the State of California - Habeas Corpus

A new Habeas Corpus case, Andrade v. Attorney General of the State of California, was filed on March 3, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, bearing docket number 3:26-cv-01814-RFL, involves a petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

Women in Construction Week Celebrates Achievements

The Virginia Department of Labor and Industry (DOLI) is celebrating Women in Construction Week, highlighting the achievements of women in the trades and encouraging future careers. The notice shares statistics on women in the construction workforce and their representation in workplace injuries.

FDA Guidance on Real-World Data for Medicine Safety Assessment

The FDA has issued final guidance on using real-world data for medicine safety assessments, replacing a previous draft and withdrawing an older guidance. This document provides principles for planning, designing, analyzing, and reporting non-interventional studies utilizing real-world data for drugs and biological products.

FDA Draft Guidance on 3-Year Exclusivity for Drug Products

The FDA has issued draft guidance to assist applicants requesting 3-year exclusivity for drug products. The guidance, available for public comment, clarifies the statutory and regulatory criteria for eligibility and provides recommendations on request content and format. This aims to support the Drug Competition Action Plan.

FDA Final Guidance on Post-Approval Safety Data Reporting

The FDA has issued final guidance on post-approval safety data reporting, updating standards for managing and reporting individual case safety reports. This guidance clarifies the use of new data sources and replaces previous versions from 2003 and a draft from March 2024.

State v. Lee - Murder Case Statements Admitted

The Supreme Court of Georgia reviewed a trial court's decision to suppress incriminating statements made by a defendant, Michael Donnell Lee, charged with murder. The appellate court affirmed the suppression of statements under Miranda and Edwards but reversed the suppression under due process principles.

Hamilton v. State - Appeal of Felony Murder Convictions

The Supreme Court of Georgia decided the case of Hamilton v. The State, concerning appeals of felony murder convictions stemming from a fatal shooting. The court affirmed the trial court's decisions regarding mistrial motions and evidence admission, upholding the convictions.

Mitchell v. The State - Murder and Knife Possession Conviction Appeal

The Supreme Court of Georgia decided Mitchell v. The State on March 3, 2026. The court affirmed the conviction of Johnson Bell Mitchell for malice murder and possession of a knife during the commission of a felony. The appeal addressed the trial court's refusal to consider a motion for immunity and an objection to a prosecutor's statement.

Medina v. State - Felony Murder and Assault Convictions Appeal

The Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed the felony murder, aggravated assault, and firearm possession convictions of Terrance Medina. Medina appealed based on issues with jury instructions regarding self-defense and defense of habitation, ineffective assistance of counsel, and erroneous jury charges on prima facie cases. The court found no reversible error in the trial court's rulings.

Robinson v. The State - Murder Conviction Appeal Denied

The Supreme Court of Georgia denied David Robinson's appeal of his malice murder conviction. The court affirmed the trial court's denial of a motion for mistrial, finding the claim was not preserved for appellate review. Robinson was sentenced to life without parole.

Rogers v. State - Murder Conviction Appeal

The Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed a murder conviction appeal for Ralph Rogers. The court addressed issues of insufficient evidence and self-defense claims, ultimately upholding the conviction and sentences.

Sanders v. The State - Appeal of Murder Convictions

The Supreme Court of Georgia decided Sanders v. The State on March 3, 2026. Appellant Joshua Sanders appealed his convictions for malice murder and related offenses. The court affirmed the trial court's denial of the motion for a new trial, finding the appellant's claims procedurally barred.

Small v. State - Malice Murder Conviction Affirmed

The Georgia Supreme Court affirmed Gregory Small's conviction for malice murder and other charges. Small argued his due process rights were violated due to a lack of formal arraignment and ineffective assistance of counsel. The court found no merit in these arguments and upheld the conviction and sentence.

Strong v. State - Felony Murder Conviction Appeal

The Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed the felony murder conviction of Aaron Edward Strong for the fatal stabbing of Maurice Arnold and the stabbing of Deandre Arnold. Strong's appeal challenged the exclusion of text messages and prosecutorial remarks during closing arguments, among other issues. The court found no abuse of discretion and affirmed the trial court's rulings.

Jackson v. The State - Felony Murder Conviction Appeal

The Supreme Court of Georgia partially vacated and remanded a felony murder conviction for Quinta vius Jackson due to a sentencing error. While the evidence was found sufficient, the court identified an error in sentencing Jackson on both felony murder counts, requiring resentencing.

Woods v. State - Appeal of Malice Murder Conviction

The Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed the malice murder conviction of Maleik Woods for the shooting death of Francisco Zapata. Woods appealed his conviction, arguing the trial court erred in admitting evidence of other acts and in coercing a jury verdict. The court found no merit in his arguments and upheld the conviction.

Disciplinary Case Recommends Disbarment for Joseph William Cloud

The Supreme Court of Georgia is considering a recommendation for disbarment against attorney Joseph William Cloud. Cloud faces charges for misconduct and abandonment of clients, and has failed to participate in the disciplinary process, leading to a default judgment and a recommendation for the maximum sanction.

Georgia Supreme Court affirms denial of habeas corpus petition

The Georgia Supreme Court affirmed the denial of a habeas corpus petition filed by Exzavious Gibson, who was convicted of murder and armed robbery in 1990. The court found that Gibson failed to demonstrate an actual conflict of interest that adversely affected his trial counsel's performance.

Supreme Court of Georgia suspends lawyer Oksana Klymovych for one year

The Supreme Court of Georgia has suspended lawyer Oksana Klymovych for one year due to violations of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct. The court reversed a default judgment, remanding the case to address the merits of the allegations.

Georgia Supreme Court Opinions Published March 3, 2026

The Georgia Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's denial of a habeas corpus petition filed by Exzavious Gibson, challenging his 1990 murder and armed robbery convictions. The court found no actual conflict of interest that adversely affected his trial counsel's performance, despite a disclosure issue.

Senior v. The State - Appeal of Malice Murder Conviction

Oscar Senior is appealing his 2013 malice murder conviction from a 2012 shooting. The Georgia Supreme Court affirmed the conviction, finding that any deficient performance by his trial counsel in failing to impeach witnesses with prior felony convictions did not prejudice Senior. The appeal was granted out-of-time due to ineffective assistance of counsel in failing to file a timely notice of appeal.

Federal Bureau of Prisons Information Security Audit FY 2025

The Department of Justice's Office of the Inspector General has released an audit report on the Federal Bureau of Prisons' Information Security Management Program for Fiscal Year 2025. The report, dated March 3, 2026, identifies 5 recommendations for improvement.

DOJ Audit of BOP Security Controls and Network FY2025

The Department of Justice's Office of the Inspector General has released an audit report on the Federal Bureau of Prisons' security controls and network (BOPNet) for Fiscal Year 2025. The report, dated March 3, 2026, was conducted pursuant to the Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2014.

Hoffman v. Inova Health Care Services - Employment Discrimination

The Fourth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of employment discrimination claims filed by two CRNAs against Inova Health Care Services and NAPA. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to state a claim and that one plaintiff did not exhaust administrative remedies.

Fourth Circuit Affirms Ruling in Hoffman v. INOVA Health Care

The Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's dismissal of claims brought by two CRNAs against Inova Health Care Services and North American Partners in Anesthesia (NAPA). The plaintiffs alleged discrimination and joint employer status after their clinical privileges were suspended and employment terminated due to refusal of COVID-19 vaccinations.

Fitzwater v. CONSOL Energy - ERISA Retiree Benefits

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision regarding the termination of CONSOL Energy's retiree welfare benefits plan. The court found that ERISA permits such changes when employers reserve the right to amend or terminate plans and employees are aware of these actions. The decision impacts employers with similar benefit plans and their former employees.

US v. John Moore - Fourth Amendment Search and Seizure

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated and remanded a conviction for John Henry Moore, instructing the district court to conduct an evidentiary hearing on the defendant's motion to suppress evidence seized during searches of his apartment. The court found the district court erred by denying the motion without a hearing.

US v. Cory Currie - Criminal Appeal

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed in part and affirmed in part the appeal of Cory Fernando Currie. The court granted the government's motion to dismiss the appeal based on the appeal waiver in Currie's plea agreement, finding the district court conducted a proper Rule 11 hearing.

Phillip Hill v. Frederick County Maryland District Court - Civil Appeal

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's order dismissing a pro se civil complaint filed by Phillip Edward Hill against the Frederick County Maryland District Court and other defendants. The court found no reversible error in the district court's decision.

Vines v. Virginia Department of Corrections - Appeal Dismissed

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed Clayton Vines's appeal of a district court order. The dismissal was based on Vines's failure to file timely objections to a magistrate judge's recommendation, thereby forfeiting appellate review. The unpublished opinion does not constitute binding precedent.

US v. Raoul Lafond - Affirmation of District Court Order

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision to construe Raoul Lafond's motion for relief from judgment as an unauthorized, successive motion to vacate a sentence. The court denied Lafond's request to file a second or successive motion.

Emmanuel King Shaw v. Byron Watson - Appeal of Dismissed Motion

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision to dismiss a motion for relief from judgment as an unauthorized successive petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The court denied authorization for a successive petition, citing lack of prefiling authorization.

US v. Rashaun Taylor - Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Filing

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed Rashaun Taylor's appeal for lack of jurisdiction due to an untimely filed notice of appeal. The court denied his motions to consolidate and for Brady v. Maryland consideration, upholding the district court's order denying his motion to compel discovery.

US v. Okechukwu Dimkpa - Affirmation of Conviction

The Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's denial of a physician's motion to vacate his conviction for unlawfully distributing oxycodone. The court found that the defendant procedurally defaulted his claim, which was based on a subsequent Supreme Court ruling regarding the mens rea requirement for such offenses, and did not demonstrate sufficient cause to overcome this default.

Christopher Martin v. Joseph Walters - Appeal Dismissal

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed Christopher James Martin's appeal of a district court's order. The court denied Martin's request for a certificate of appealability, finding he did not make the requisite showing of a denial of a constitutional right.

Eric Exum v. Lieutenant Donna - Civil Action Appeal

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision to dismiss a civil action filed by inmate Eric Ricardo Exum. The court found that Exum forfeited appellate review by failing to challenge the district court's ruling in his informal brief.

McKeever v. State of North Carolina - Appeal Dismissed

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed an appeal filed by William N. McKeever, a North Carolina inmate, due to a late filing of the notice of appeal. The court found that the appeal period expired before McKeever filed his notice, thus lacking jurisdiction.

US v. Tito Knox - Appeal from South Carolina District Court Affirmed

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision denying Tito Knox's motion to terminate conditional release and supervision. The court found that Knox forfeited appellate review by not challenging the district court's disposition in his informal brief.

Ward v. United States - Appeal of Compassionate Release Denial

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's denial of David Clarence Ward's motion for compassionate release. The court found no abuse of discretion in denying the motion, which cited extraordinary and compelling reasons and considered sentencing factors.

Ralston v. Clarke - Civil Rights Appeal

The Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's dismissal of a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil action filed by a Virginia inmate. The court found no abuse of discretion in the denial of the inmate's motion for appointment of counsel or in delaying discovery rulings pending a motion to dismiss. The inmate forfeited appellate review by not challenging the district court's disposition in his informal brief.

Bullock v. Hamby - Civil Rights Appeal

The Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's decision to dismiss a prisoner's civil rights lawsuit for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The unpublished opinion clarifies that such decisions, while not binding precedent, uphold the procedural requirements for inmate litigation.

River Richards v. Major Brian Parks - Appeal of Complaint Dismissal

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal of River Richards' amended complaint without prejudice. The court found no reversible error in the dismissal for failure to state a claim or in the denial of the motion for reconsideration. The decision is unpublished and not binding precedent.

US v. Randall Keystone - Compassionate Release Appeal

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision denying Randall J. Keystone's motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). The court found no reversible error in the lower court's ruling.

Bowens v. Rokosky - Prisoner Sentence Challenge Dismissal Affirmed

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of a federal prisoner's petition challenging his sentence execution. The court found the prisoner failed to exhaust administrative remedies and that his claim was not yet ripe.

William Custis v. Exmore Police Department - Civil Rights Appeal

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision to dismiss a civil rights action filed by William Parke Custis against the Exmore Police Department and other defendants. The dismissal was based on the plaintiff's failure to comply with court orders to submit a particularized complaint.

Custis v. Accomack County Sheriff's Office - Civil Rights Appeal

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision to dismiss a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. The dismissal was based on the plaintiff's failure to comply with the court's order to file a particularized complaint. The court found no reversible error in the district court's ruling.

Courtney Boyd v. United States - Compassionate Release Appeal Denied

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's denial of Courtney Omar Boyd's motion for compassionate release. The court found no abuse of discretion in the district court's determination that Boyd failed to demonstrate extraordinary and compelling reasons for release.

Brandon Thompson Appeal Dismissed by Fourth Circuit

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed Brandon J. Thompson's appeal of a district court order denying his motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The court found that Thompson failed to make the requisite showing for a certificate of appealability, thus denying the appeal.

US v. Terry White - Affirmation of Revoked Supervised Release Sentence

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision to revoke Terry Antonio White's supervised release and impose an 18-month prison sentence. The court found no meritorious grounds for appeal, concluding the sentence was not plainly unreasonable.

US v. Lloyd Royal III - Compassionate Release Appeal

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's denial of Lloyd Mack Royal III's motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). The court found no reversible error in the lower court's decision. This unpublished opinion does not constitute binding precedent.

US v. Daron Wright - Affirmation of Supervised Release Revocation

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision to revoke Daron Wright's supervised release, imposing a 10-month prison term and an 18-month supervised release term. The court found no meritorious grounds for appeal regarding the reasonableness of the sentence or ineffective assistance of counsel.

Cooper v. City of Wheeling - Malicious Prosecution Claim

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded a malicious prosecution claim. The court found that the appellant's claim was not time-barred under the two-year statute of limitations but affirmed the dismissal of the claim against the City of Wheeling due to lack of municipal policy or custom allegations.

Beckford v. Elevance Health, Inc. - Employment Discrimination Appeal

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated and remanded a district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Elevance Health, Inc. The court found that the district court erred in its assessment of the prima facie case for employment discrimination, potentially shifting the burden of proof prematurely. The case involves claims of race discrimination under Title VII and other statutes.

Barricks v. Wright - Excessive Force Appeal Affirmed

The Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's decision denying qualified immunity to a sheriff's deputy accused of excessive force. The court found that disputed facts regarding the force used during an arrest necessitate a trial, affirming the appeal denial.

Stephanie Reddin v. Kristi Noem - Employment Discrimination Appeal

The Fourth Circuit affirmed a lower court's dismissal of a former Federal Air Marshal's discrimination lawsuit against the TSA. The court found the plaintiff failed to adequately plead she was a qualified individual capable of performing essential job functions, and that the TSA had provided reasonable accommodations.

Heather Cogdell v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance - ERISA Disability Benefits

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision in Heather Cogdell v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company. The court held that an untimely decision by a plan administrator on an internal appeal of a disability benefits claim, governed by ERISA, does not warrant deferential review.

United States v. Brian K. Griffey - Affirmation of Conviction

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Brian K. Griffey for violating supervised release terms. The court found the 24-month sentence imposed by the district court to be reasonable and not plainly unreasonable.

US v. Rashaun Taylor - Affirmance of conviction in part, dismissal in part

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed in part and dismissed in part the appeal of Rashaun Antonio Taylor. The court vacated Taylor's conviction on Count 3 (use of a firearm during a RICO conspiracy) and its attendant sentence, but otherwise affirmed the district court's denial of his motion for relief.

US v. Antionne Cherry - Sentencing Appeal

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the sentence of Antionne Cherry, who appealed his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm. The court found that any error in calculating Cherry's sentencing guidelines range was harmless.

FDA Warning Letter to Kare Solutions LLC dba Zappy

The FDA issued a warning letter to Kare Solutions LLC dba Zappy for misbranding compounded drug products, including semaglutide, tirzepatide, and liraglutide. The agency found that Zappy's website made false or misleading claims about these products, suggesting they were FDA-approved or compounded by Zappy when they were not.

FDA Warning Letter to Strut Health, LLC

The FDA issued a warning letter to Strut Health, LLC on February 20, 2026, for misbranding compounded semaglutide and tirzepatide products. The company's website allegedly made false or misleading claims about these drugs, violating the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.

FDA Warning Letter to GenoGenix LLC

The FDA issued a warning letter to GenoGenix LLC for serious deficiencies in drug production practices, including failures to meet conditions for outsourcing facilities and insanitary conditions. The company has ceased production and initiated a voluntary recall of drug products.

FDA Warning Letter to Beta Bionics, Inc.

The FDA issued a warning letter to Beta Bionics, Inc. regarding violations of the Quality System Regulation for their iLet Dosing Decision Software and iLet ACE Pump. The letter details failures in corrective and preventive action procedures, including inadequate analysis of complaints leading to serious adverse health outcomes.

FDA Warning Letter to Diasol, Inc. for Medical Device Violations

The FDA issued a warning letter to Diasol, Inc. for manufacturing unapproved and misbranded medical devices, specifically disinfectants for hemodialysis systems. The company also violated Quality System Regulation requirements. The FDA has requested corrective actions to ensure compliance.

FDA Warning Letter to Yuyao City Boss Vegetable Factory

The FDA issued a warning letter to Yuyao City Boss Vegetable Factory Co. Ltd. for serious violations of food safety regulations, including failure to maintain processing records and fabrication of data. The violations relate to acidified foods intended for export to the United States.

FDA Warning Letter to John Yoder Farm

The FDA issued a warning letter to John Yoder Farm for serious violations of the Shell Egg Regulation (21 CFR Part 118) and the FD&C Act. The farm failed to implement a written Salmonella Enteritidis Prevention Plan and had other insanitary conditions. The FDA is concerned about the compliance status and potential health risks.

FDA Warning Letter to The Father's Table, LLC

The FDA issued a warning letter to The Father's Table, LLC, for serious violations of Current Good Manufacturing Practice and Hazard Analysis and Risk-Based Preventative Controls for Human Food regulations. The inspection found Listeria monocytogenes in the facility, rendering ready-to-eat food products adulterated.

FDA Warning Letter to Black Sheep Egg Company

The FDA issued a warning letter to Black Sheep Egg Company, LLC, following an inspection that detected Salmonella in environmental samples from their shell egg processing facility. The company is cited for insanitary conditions and violations of the Shell Egg regulation, rendering their products adulterated.

FDA Warning Letter to Supercan Bully Sticks LLC

The FDA issued a warning letter to Supercan Bully Sticks LLC on September 24, 2025, following inspections that revealed serious violations of the Foreign Supplier Verification Program (FSVP) and Current Good Manufacturing Practice regulations. These violations were identified after a voluntary recall of pet treats due to Salmonella contamination.

Hyh’nes Hidiyah Bakri v. Cruz Management Company, Incorporated, et al. - Denial of Preliminary Injunction

The U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts denied a plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction against the YMCA and its property manager. The case involves a tenancy dispute and ongoing eviction proceedings.

Hyh’nes Hidiyah Bakri v. Cruz Management Company - Service of Process

The District Court of Massachusetts dismissed the Bakri case against Cruz Management Company, Inc. and other defendants, ordering proper service of process. The court addressed the plaintiff's motions for default entry and judgment, noting issues with service completion within the mandated ninety-day period.

Kingston v. Strange - Procedural Order

The District of Massachusetts issued a procedural order in Kingston v. Strange, addressing pending sanctions motions and future reply brief requirements. The court will rule on sanctions in due course and requires parties to seek leave before filing future reply briefs.

NRC Proposed Rule on Streamlining Contested Adjudications

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has proposed changes to streamline contested adjudications in licensing proceedings. This proposed rule is open for public comment until April 2, 2026.

SEC Adopts HFIA Act Disclosure Rules for Foreign Issuers

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has adopted new rules under the Holding Foreign Insiders Accountable (HFIA) Act. These rules require public companies to disclose information regarding foreign issuers, aiming to enhance transparency and accountability. The rules become effective on March 18, 2026.

Nebraska Supreme Court Opinion

The Nebraska Supreme Court has issued a new opinion document, available through the state's online library. This document is part of the court's public record and is accessible via the provided URL.

State v. F. Hinkle - Montana Supreme Court Affirmance

The Montana Supreme Court affirmed the State v. F. Hinkle opinion, upholding the lower court's decision. The appeal concerned the denial of a motion to discharge the jury panel without a hearing. The court found no error in the District Court's ruling.

Montana Supreme Court Affirms Warwood v. Florer

The Montana Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's order of protection in Warwood v. Florer. The case involved a dispute over a 'work for rent' arrangement and alleged verbal abuse. The appellate court designated the opinion as non-precedential.

Darrah v. Haggag - Montana Supreme Court Affirms Order of Protection

The Montana Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's permanent order of protection against Adam Kadry Haggag, restraining him from his minor children. The decision upholds the district court's ruling, which was based on prior orders and conditions designed to improve Haggag's parenting.

State v. R. Haacke - Montana Supreme Court Affirmance

The Montana Supreme Court affirmed the conviction of Richard James Haacke for criminal possession of dangerous drugs and drug paraphernalia. The court considered whether the District Court abused its discretion by denying a motion to strike a juror for cause.

Centron v. Hollewijn - Montana Supreme Court Reverses and Remands

The Montana Supreme Court reversed and remanded the case of Centron Services, Inc. v. Hollewijn. The court found that the District Court erred by dismissing the entire lawsuit when the summary judgment motion only addressed one of five debt accounts and by resolving a genuine issue of material fact.

Rita Carnevale v. State of Delaware - Assault Order

The Delaware Superior Court issued an order in the case of Rita Carnevale v. State of Delaware. The order details an incident at a business meeting where the defendant allegedly assaulted another attendee following a political disagreement. The court reviewed testimony from multiple witnesses.

Court Denies Plaintiffs' Summary Judgment, Grants Defendant's in Part

The Delaware Superior Court denied the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment and granted in part the defendant's motion in a contract dispute. The case involves allegations of breach of contract and fraud related to a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement.

Conduent v. AIG Specialty Insurance - Summary Judgment Denied

The Delaware Superior Court denied Conduent's motion for summary judgment against AIG Specialty Insurance Company and others. This ruling follows a prior Supreme Court decision affirming the Superior Court's decision to grant a new trial in a complex commercial litigation case concerning insurance coverage.

Linardon v. Staybridge Suites - Mandamus Case Affirmed

The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts affirmed a lower court's denial of a petition for writ of mandamus. The petitioner sought to compel the transfer of a summary process action to the Superior Court, but the court found no statutory basis for such a transfer. The underlying case has since resulted in a judgment for the landlord.

Latham v. POAH Communities - Housing Injunction Appeal

The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts affirmed a lower court's denial of a petition filed by Lincoln G. Latham, Jr. The petitioner sought relief from a preliminary injunction and the dismissal of his appeal related to a Section 8 subsidized tenancy dispute. The court found Latham had adequate alternative remedies and did not meet the criteria for review.

California Launches Women in Construction Public Awareness Campaign

The California Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) has launched a new public awareness campaign, "Women in Construction," to highlight career pathways in the building trades. The campaign aims to address the underrepresentation of women in construction jobs and complements the state's $50 million investment in grants to promote equitable apprenticeship opportunities.

Morrissey v. Morrissey - Matrimonial Action Dismissal

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York affirmed the denial of the plaintiff's motion to consolidate a Family Court proceeding and granted the defendant's cross-motion to dismiss the matrimonial action. The court found that a prior pending action in Queens County involved the same parties, subject matter, and relief sought.

People v. Rodriguez - Criminal Possession of a Weapon Conviction

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York affirmed a conviction for criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree. The court addressed the defendant's Second Amendment claim, finding it did not render the state's firearm licensing scheme unconstitutional.

People v. Zwingman - Court Opinion

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York issued an opinion in the case of People v. Zwingman, decided on March 3, 2026. The court affirmed the judgment and granted the defendant's counsel's application to withdraw, finding no non-frivolous points for appeal.

People v. Marquis - Appellate Division Court Opinion

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York affirmed a judgment from the Supreme Court, Bronx County, in the case of People v. Marquis. The court found the sentence imposed was not excessive.

People v. J.R. - Criminal Law and Second Amendment Challenge

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York affirmed a conviction for attempted criminal possession of a weapon and assault. The court addressed the defendant's Second Amendment challenge to New York's age requirement for gun licensing, finding it without merit.

People v. O'Connor - Appellate Division Opinion

The Appellate Division, First Department, affirmed a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County, in the case of People v. O'Connor. The court found the sentence imposed on the defendant-appellant not to be excessive.

FORT CRE v Karasick - Appellate Division Ruling on Guaranty Enforcement

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York reversed a lower court's decision to grant a stay in a guaranty enforcement action. The court ruled that defenses to a related Minnesota foreclosure action are irrelevant to the enforcement of absolute and unconditional guaranties of payment.

Colon v. City of New York - Slip and Fall Action

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York reversed a lower court's decision, denying a motion for summary judgment in a slip and fall case against Rita Marsicano. The court found that the defendant failed to establish freedom from common-law liability regarding an icy condition on her property.

Arita v. FDS Assoc., LLC - Court Opinion

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York modified an order regarding a motion by third-party defendant The City of New York. The court granted limited discovery while affirming the denial of other requests, impacting the procedural path of the case.

Friedman v. Garnet Wines & Liqs. Inc. - Defamation Claim Ruling

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York affirmed a lower court's decision to dismiss a defamation claim in Friedman v. Garnet Wines & Liqs. Inc. The court found that the statement made by the defendant, viewed in context, constituted nonactionable opinion. The ruling was issued on March 3, 2026.

U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Gordon - Foreclosure Statute of Limitations

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York affirmed a lower court's decision to dismiss a foreclosure action brought by U.S. Bank, N.A. The court found the action was barred by the statute of limitations, citing the Foreclosure Abuse Prevention Act (FAPA) and its impact on deacceleration letters. The decision impacts financial institutions involved in mortgage foreclosures in New York.

JDS Constr. Group LLC v. Copper Servs., LLC - Court Opinion

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York modified a lower court's order in JDS Constr. Group LLC v. Copper Servs., LLC. The court reinstated certain counterclaims related to trust funds and granted a motion to amend counterclaims, while affirming other dismissals.

Matter of Cook v. New York City Hous. Auth. - Appellate Court Decision

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York affirmed a lower court's decision denying a petitioner's motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim against the New York City Housing Authority. The court found the petitioner failed to provide a reasonable excuse for the delay and that the Authority did not acquire actual knowledge of the claim within the statutory period.

Castle Vil. Owners Corp. v. Girardi - Appellate Division Opinion

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York reversed a lower court's decision in Castle Vil. Owners Corp. v. Girardi. The court declared that the defendant must provide access to her apartment for repairs and bear the cost, reversing the denial of the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment.

People v. Johnson - Sex Offender Registration Act Adjudication

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York affirmed a lower court's decision adjudicating Clayton Johnson a level three predicate sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act. The court found that the defendant's extensive criminal history, including prior convictions for rape and forcible touching, demonstrated a high risk of recidivism, outweighing any mitigating factors.

Matter of AN.D. (A.D., J.A.) - Child Neglect Appeal

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York affirmed a Family Court decision finding a father neglected his children due to significant educational neglect. The court upheld the Family Court's decision to conform pleadings to the proof, noting the father had a full opportunity to address the allegations.

People v. Taveres - Sex Offender Classification

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York affirmed a lower court's decision adjudicating Rolando Taveres a level two sexually violent offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act. The court found sufficient evidence for the risk assessment and declined to grant a downward departure.

Paitchell v. Goldman - Breach of Contract and Constructive Trust Dispute

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York affirmed a lower court's decision denying plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment and granting defendants' cross-motion to dismiss claims for breach of contract and imposition of a constructive trust in the case of Paitchell v. Goldman. The decision pertains to the interpretation of a post-nuptial agreement regarding jointly held property.

Felton v. St. Joseph Hosp. - Negligence and Wrongful Death

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York reversed a lower court's decision, dismissing all claims against St. Joseph Hospital, Greenwood Crematory, and Ackerman's Funeral Chapel. The case involved alleged infringement of rights of sepulcher concerning the disposition of a decedent's body.

Coyne v. State of Tennessee - Post-Conviction Relief Denial

The Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the denial of Jacob Evan Coyne's petition for post-conviction relief. Coyne argued ineffective assistance of counsel regarding pretrial motions, client meetings, and plea negotiations. The court found no error in the lower court's decision.

State of Tennessee v. Joshua Bowman - Criminal Appeal Opinion

The State of Tennessee's Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed a lower court's dismissal of Joshua Bowman's petition for a writ of error coram nobis. Bowman sought a new trial based on newly discovered evidence related to his mental capacity, but the court found the petition untimely and the evidence not newly discovered.

Court Affirms Divorce, Alimony, and Property Division

The Tennessee Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's decision regarding divorce, alimony, and equitable division of marital property. The appellate court found no abuse of discretion in the lower court's rulings concerning the dissolution of a 20-year marriage.

Tennessee Criminal Appeals Court Denies Extraordinary Appeal

The Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals denied an inmate's application for an extraordinary appeal and writ of mandamus. The court found the inmate failed to meet procedural requirements for the appeal and that a writ of mandamus was not appropriate as the post-conviction petition was proceeding correctly.

Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidance

The Virginia Department of Health has issued guidance recommending that individuals at average risk for colorectal cancer begin screening at age 45. The guidance highlights rising rates in younger adults and emphasizes the importance of early detection through screening tests.

Potomac River Recreational Water Advisory Update

The Alexandria Health Department (AHD) has provided an update on the recreational water advisory for the Potomac River, originally issued by the Virginia Department of Health. The advisory continues, recommending avoidance of water activities in the river, with no end date specified. Testing for bacteria is underway, with results pending.

Rabies Alert in Hopewell City, VA

The Virginia Department of Health issued a rabies alert for Hopewell City, VA, following confirmation of a stray cat testing positive for the virus. Residents are urged to ensure pet vaccinations are current and to report any stray animals or potential exposures.

Executive Order 26-47: Extension of State Attorney Assignment

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis issued Executive Order 26-47, extending the assignment of State Attorney Katherine Fernandez Rundle for one year, until April 11, 2027. This extension is necessary to complete duties related to charges pending against Melody Johnson.

Governor DeSantis Orders Prosecution of Adriana O'Hara

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has issued an Executive Order assigning the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit's State Attorney to prosecute Adriana O'Hara for stalking. This action is taken to avoid a conflict of interest, as O'Hara is a former employee of the state attorney's office. The assignment is effective immediately and will last for one year.

Executive Order 26-36: Richards Case Circuit Assignment

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis issued Executive Order 26-36, assigning State Attorney William M. Gladson to prosecute the case of Rachel Ann Richards due to a conflict of interest with the original State Attorney. The assignment is effective immediately and lasts for one year.

State Attorney Executive Assignment for Kianna Lopez Case

Florida Governor DeSantis has issued an Executive Order assigning State Attorney Katherine Fernandez Rundle to handle the investigation and prosecution of matters related to Kianna Lopez. This assignment is effective immediately and will last for one year, until March 2, 2027, to avoid a conflict of interest.

Executive Assignment of State Attorney in Massingill Case

Florida Governor DeSantis has assigned State Attorney Monique H. Worrell of the Ninth Judicial Circuit to handle the investigation and prosecution of the Christopher C. Massingill case, including a violation of probation and related motions. This assignment is effective immediately and will last for one year, until March 2, 2027.

Executive Assignment for DUI Case Prosecution

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has issued an executive order assigning State Attorney Dennis W. Ward to prosecute a DUI case involving Mario Vanegas Mondragon. This assignment is due to a conflict of interest declared by the original State Attorney for the Eleventh Judicial Circuit. The assignment is effective immediately and lasts for one year.

Florida Governor Assigns Prosecutor, Disqualifies Another

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis issued Executive Order 26-42, assigning State Attorney Katherine Fernandez Rundle to prosecute a case involving Dai Asia Shaterria Wright due to a conflict of interest with the original prosecutor, Harold F. Pryor. The assignment is effective immediately and lasts for one year.

DeSantis Issues EO 26-39 for Neilinger Investigation

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis issued Executive Order 26-39, assigning State Attorney Katherine Fernandez Rundle to investigate and prosecute the case of Brian Joseph Neilinger. This assignment is due to a conflict of interest declared by the original State Attorney and is effective for one year.

Executive Order 26-43: State Attorney Assignment for Hyder, Synrex Cases

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis issued Executive Order 26-43, assigning State Attorney R.J. Larizza of the Seventh Judicial Circuit to investigate and prosecute cases involving Joshua Julius Hyder and Amanda Lee Synrex. This assignment is due to a conflict of interest declared by the original State Attorney for the Fifth Judicial Circuit. The assignment is effective immediately and lasts for one year, with a possibility of extension.

Executive Order Extending State Attorney Assignment for Markeith Loyd Case

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has extended Executive Order 26-45, continuing the assignment of State Attorney William M. Gladson to the Markeith Loyd case for an additional year, until March 16, 2027. This extension is necessary as the case remains pending and the assigned duties are not yet complete.

Executive Assignment for Michael Landon James Case

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has issued an executive order assigning State Attorney Amira D. Fox to investigate and prosecute the case of Michael Landon James, who was arrested for domestic violence. This assignment is due to a conflict of interest within the original prosecuting office and is effective immediately for one year.

Executive Order 26-46: Extension of State Attorney Assignment for Trevoy Williams Case

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis issued Executive Order 26-46, extending the assignment of the State Attorney for the Eleventh Judicial Circuit to the Trevoy Williams case for an additional year, until March 27, 2027. This extension is necessary as the case remains pending and the assigned State Attorney has not yet completed their duties.

Executive Order 26-49 Extends State Attorney Assignment

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis issued Executive Order 26-49, extending the assignment of State Attorney Alexcia Cox for one year, until December 13, 2026. This extension is necessary to complete duties related to charges pending against Emmanuel Okwor.

Governor DeSantis Extends State Attorney Assignment

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has extended the executive assignment of State Attorney Alexcia Cox for one year, until January 2, 2027. This extension pertains to her representation of the State of Florida in charges pending against Arseline Pierre, as the case remains ongoing.

Executive Order Extends State Attorney Assignment for Miller Case

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has issued Executive Order 26-50, extending the assignment of State Attorney Ed Brodsky for one year to handle charges against Jonathan Mark Miller. The extension is necessary as the case remains pending and duties are not yet completed.

DeSantis Extends Executive Order 26-51 for State Attorney Assignment

Governor DeSantis has extended Executive Order 26-51, continuing the assignment of State Attorney William M. Gladson for charges pending against DeMorris Hunter. The extension is for one year, through April 3, 2027, as the case remains ongoing.

Florida Governor Extends Attorney Assignment for Dolan Darling Case

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has extended the executive assignment of the State Attorney for the Fifth Judicial Circuit for an additional year, until April 3, 2027. This extension pertains to the ongoing case against Dolan Darling, a.k.a. Sean Hector Smith, as the assigned duties have not yet been completed.

Florida Governor Extends State Attorney Assignment for Huggins Case

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has extended the assignment of State Attorney William M. Gladson for the John S. Huggins case by one year, until April 3, 2027. This extension is necessary as the case is still pending and the assigned duties are not yet complete.

Executive Order 26-52: Extension of State Attorney Assignment

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis issued Executive Order 26-52, extending the assignment of State Attorney William M. Gladson for one year, until April 3, 2027. This extension is necessary to complete duties related to charges pending against Dane Patrick Abdool.

Executive Order Extending State Attorney Assignment for Kenneth Robert Kelly Case

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis issued Executive Order 26-55, extending the assignment of a State Attorney for one year, until December 14, 2026, to continue representing the State in charges pending against Kenneth Robert Kelly. This order reaffirms previous assignments and ensures the case can be completed.

United States v. Amador Magallon Guerrero - Court Opinion

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial of motions to suppress evidence against Amador Magallon Guerrero. The court found no reversible error in the denial of motions related to alleged violations of the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourth Amendment rights during the investigation and seizure of evidence.

David Sanders v. Laura Plappert - Sixth Circuit Opinion

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals has issued an opinion in the case of David Sanders v. Laura Plappert, with docket number 16-6152. The opinion was decided and filed on March 3, 2026, and is recommended for publication.

Amadou Sy v. Pamela Bondi - Immigration Appeal

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals denied Amadou Sy's petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' decision. The court found substantial evidence supported the rejection of Sy's asylum, withholding of removal, and CAT protection claims due to a lack of credible testimony.

SEC Sanctions Carole Liston for Investor Fund Misuse

The SEC has sanctioned Carole A. Liston for misusing investor funds, raising at least $5.7 million from approximately 200 investors nationwide. The sanctions follow a civil judgment permanently enjoining Liston from future violations of securities laws.

Chitwood v. Ascension Health Alliance - FMLA Case

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision in favor of Ascension Health Alliance in a case brought by former employee Elizabeth Chitwood. Chitwood alleged interference with and retaliation for her use of FMLA leave. The court found no evidence to support her claims.

Michael Connor v. Brittany Greene - Criminal Appeal

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's denial of a federal habeas corpus petition. The petitioner, Michael Connor, sought to overturn his conviction for predatory criminal sexual assault of a child, arguing ineffective assistance of counsel regarding a plea offer. The court found no constitutional error in the denial of post-conviction relief.

State v. Texeira - Certiorari Application Rejected

The Supreme Court of the State of Hawaiʻi has rejected the application for a writ of certiorari filed by Petitioner Kenneth Edward Texeira in State v. Texeira. The application was filed on January 20, 2026, and the order rejecting it was issued on March 3, 2026.

Matthew Reyes v. Peter Taisipic Iriarte - Certiorari Application Rejected

The Supreme Court of the State of Hawai'i has rejected Matthew Reyes' application for a writ of certiorari in the case SCWC-23-0000095. This order signifies the final denial of Reyes' attempt to have the Intermediate Court of Appeals' decision reviewed by the Supreme Court.

Winged Foot Minerals v. SWN Production Company - Oil and Gas Ownership Dispute

The West Virginia Intermediate Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision voiding a 1993 tax deed. The court found that the petitioners, Winged Foot Minerals, LLC and others, did not hold the correct ownership interest in oil and gas rights for a tract of land in Marshall County.

Duvall Espresso IP Enforcement v. Meticulous Home - Patent Infringement Opinion

The US District Court for the District of Delaware issued a memorandum opinion in the patent infringement case Duvall Espresso IP Enforcement, LLC v. Meticulous Home, Inc. The court granted-in-part and denied-in-part the defendants' motion to dismiss the first amended complaint.

Miller v. RxMapper, LLC - Securities Fraud Case

The US District Court for the District of Delaware issued a memorandum opinion in the securities case Miller v. RxMapper, LLC. The plaintiff alleges violations of federal securities laws and common law, including fraud and breach of contract, related to a scheme to undervalue equity units.

Howard Page Jr. v. Family Court Case 25-1546 - Dismissal Order

The U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware dismissed Howard Page Jr.'s pro se complaint against the Family Court of Delaware and other defendants. The court found the complaint failed to state a claim and sought relief from immune defendants.

TELUS v Signature Aviation - Opinion

This document is an opinion for the case TELUS v Signature Aviation, Case 25-1372. The opinion details the investigation into a missing will at Ashworth Manor, involving private investigator Eleanor Vance and various family members and staff. The will was ultimately discovered hidden within a grandfather clock.

New Directions Technology v. Abbott Laboratories - Patent Claims Dismissal Denied

The US District Court for the District of Delaware denied Abbott Laboratories Inc. and Bigfoot Biomedical, Inc.'s motion to dismiss 160 patent claims filed by New Directions Technology Consulting, LLC. The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's recommendation, finding the defendants' arguments regarding claim representativeness to be unpersuasive and conclusory.

Commonwealth v. Elon Silva Duarte - Non-Precedential Opinion

The Massachusetts Appeals Court vacated the judgment against Elon Silva Duarte, finding prejudicial error in the refusal to provide a jury instruction on bad acts. The court cited the defendant's request for a specific instruction on the permissible uses of testimony related to a separate alleged touching.

Baillargeon v. Lennon - Massachusetts Appeals Court Opinion

The Massachusetts Appeals Court affirmed a Superior Court judgment against Mathew Lennon for trespassing and damaging trees on his neighbors' property. The original judgment included $100,000 for tree damage, trebled to $300,000, plus $10,000 for encroachments, totaling $310,000.

Adoption of Mattis - Massachusetts Appeals Court Opinion

The Massachusetts Appeals Court issued an opinion in the case of Adoption of Mattis, addressing a mother's appeal regarding the termination of her parental rights. The court affirmed the lower court's decree, finding the mother's argument regarding the Department of Children and Families' reasonable efforts was waived.

Massachusetts Appeals Court non-precedential opinion Adoption of Kolleen

Massachusetts Appeals Court non-precedential opinion Adoption of Kolleen

CT Dept of Banking Administrative Orders Added

The Connecticut Department of Banking has added new administrative orders for CapexMD, LLC, dated February 26, and for Jason A. Goodhue, dated February 20. These orders represent enforcement actions taken by the department.

State AGs Demand GoFundMe Remove Unauthorized Charity Pages

Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell, along with 20 other state attorneys general and charitable regulators, has sent a letter to GoFundMe demanding the removal of unauthorized charity pages. The coalition requires proof of removal within 14 days and greater transparency in fundraising solicitations.