United States — March 2, 2026

State v. Aliff - Probation Revocation Appeal

The Court of Appeals of Kansas affirmed a district court's decision to revoke Allen Dale Aliff's probation and impose his underlying 33-month prison sentence. The appeal was submitted for summary disposition.

People v. Suarez - California Court of Appeal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal affirmed the denial of Jose Alfredo Suarez's petition for resentencing under Penal Code section 1172.6. The court found that Suarez's conviction for second degree murder was based on his determination as the actual killer, thus precluding relief under the statute.

People v. Pipping - Criminal Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division One, affirmed the conviction of Brian Frederick Pipping for second-degree murder and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. The court found no constitutional ineffectiveness of counsel regarding alleged prosecutorial misconduct during closing arguments.

People v. Nelson - Criminal Appeal

The California Court of Appeal affirmed the denial of a petition for resentencing filed by Charles L. Nelson. The court found that Nelson was the actual perpetrator of the offenses and therefore ineligible for relief under Penal Code section 1172.6. The appeal was reviewed under the Wende/Anders standard.

People v. Baltazar - Criminal Resentencing Appeal

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court's denial of a resentencing petition filed by Ernesto Baltazar under Penal Code section 1172.6. The court found substantial evidence that Baltazar aided and abetted a killing with intent to kill, thus disqualifying him from resentencing.

People v. David - Criminal Appeal

The California Court of Appeal issued an opinion in the case of People v. David, concerning a defendant convicted of five counts of first-degree murder and three counts of assault causing death. The court vacated four of the multiple-murder special circumstance findings as duplicative, otherwise affirming the judgment.

People v. Luna - Criminal Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, filed an opinion in the case of People v. Luna. The court affirmed the trial court's order denying the defendant's request for recall and resentencing under Penal Code section 1172.1. The opinion is not certified for publication.

People v. Oliver - Non-Precedential Opinion

The California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division One, affirmed the conviction of Gianni Adrian Oliver. The non-precedential opinion, filed on March 2, 2026, confirmed that there were no arguable issues on appeal following Oliver's conviction stemming from a shootout with police.

In re K.B. - Child Welfare Jurisdiction Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, has issued an opinion in the case of In re K.B. The court affirmed an order maintaining juvenile court jurisdiction over a child, finding no abuse of discretion by the lower court despite the agency's recommendation. The case involved allegations of parental alcohol abuse.

In re J.W. - Juvenile Wardship Appeal

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a juvenile court's order adjudicating J.W. a ward of the court. The order followed the sustainment of allegations for vehicle theft and hit-and-run resulting in property damage. The appeal raised no arguable issues.

Sanwa Technologies v. Titus - Civil Appeal

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court's summary judgment in favor of Sanwa Technologies, Inc. against Paul Joseph Titus. The appellate court found that Titus failed to provide an adequate record to demonstrate the trial court erred in its decision.

Ehrenkranz v. S.F. Zen Center - Wage and Hour Dispute

The California Court of Appeal reversed a trial court's summary judgment in favor of the San Francisco Zen Center in a wage-and-hour dispute filed by Michael Ehrenkranz. The court found that the ministerial exception did not bar Ehrenkranz's claims, as they did not raise an ecclesiastical concern. The court also addressed the undertaking requirement for appeals.

People v. Ryan - Mental Health Diversion Appeal

The California Court of Appeal reviewed a trial court's denial of a defendant's petition for mental health diversion. The appellate court found the trial court applied an incorrect legal standard and conditionally vacated the defendant's plea, remanding for further proceedings.

People v. Mahan - Non-Precedential Opinion Modification

The California Court of Appeal modified a non-precedential opinion in People v. Mahan (D086126). The court amended the written probation order to conform to the oral pronouncement, striking a condition allowing searches of computers and recordable media.

California DOJ Investigates Officer-Involved Shooting

The California Department of Justice is investigating an officer-involved shooting that occurred on February 28, 2026, in San Luis Obispo, resulting in one fatality. This investigation is being conducted under the mandates of Assembly Bill 1506, which requires independent review of such incidents.

AG Bonta Opposes Rule Eliminating AI Model Card Requirements in Healthcare

California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced his opposition to a proposed Trump administration rule that would eliminate AI model card requirements for healthcare products. The rule change would remove transparency and bias protections for AI used in healthcare decisions.

Renaissance Associates I L.P. v. City Of Hammond, Indiana - Appeal

The Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's decision in Renaissance Associates I L.P. v. City of Hammond, Indiana. The case involved challenges to local residential inspection and registration fees under state law. The appellate court upheld the lower court's summary judgment ruling.

SCDSS v. Douglas G. Grill - Parental Rights Termination

The Court of Appeals of South Carolina affirmed a family court's final order terminating Douglas Grant Grill's parental rights to his minor children. This non-precedential opinion should not be cited as precedent.

Washington State Coastal Resilience and Nature-Based Solutions

Washington State's Department of Ecology is highlighting efforts in North Cove to build coastal resilience using nature-based solutions like dynamic revetments and large woody debris. These initiatives aim to combat erosion and protect communities from climate-related hazards such as sea-level rise and increased storm severity.

California PUC Weekly Filings and Proposed Decisions

The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) has published its weekly update of new filings for the week of February 23-27, 2026. This includes proposed decisions open for public comment and new complaints or applications impacting utility services.

CPUC Approves Clean Electricity Procurement and Transmission Upgrades

The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) approved a decision requiring electricity providers to procure 6,000 megawatts of new clean energy and storage capacity by 2032. This decision aims to strengthen grid reliability, advance clean energy goals, and ensure affordability for customers.

State of Louisiana v. C.G. - Bail Rights in Juvenile Cases

The Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit, granted a writ concerning bail rights for juveniles. The court ordered the juvenile court to remove categorical restrictions on the type of security for bond, allowing for various forms of surety beyond cash or commercial bonds.

B.B. v. Hochul - Child Welfare Certification Rights

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed in part and affirmed in part a district court's decision in B.B. v. Hochul. The court found that plaintiffs, children removed from their parents, have standing to challenge New York's certification scheme for foster and adoptive parents, which denied certification based on criminal history or child abuse reports. The court remanded for further proceedings.

Broadcast Music, Inc. v. North American Concert Promoters Association - Antitrust

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a district court's decision regarding music licensing fees set by Broadcast Music, Inc. (BMI) for the North American Concert Promoters Association (NACPA). The court found the imposed rates and expanded definition of 'gross revenues' to be unreasonable and remanded the case for further proceedings.

GEICO v. Patel - RICO Case Decision

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a preliminary injunction against Dr. Bhargav Patel and associated entities in a RICO case brought by GEICO. The court found that the defendants participated in a scheme to defraud GEICO by exploiting New York's no-fault automobile insurance laws, leading to over $2 million in disputed claims.

NLRB v. Universal Smart Contracts, LLC - Enforcement of Subpoenas

The Second Circuit affirmed in part and dismissed in part a district court order enforcing National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) administrative subpoenas against Universal Smart Contracts, LLC, and related parties. The court found jurisdiction and venue proper but lacked jurisdiction to review the award of attorneys' fees due to a late appeal.

Care One LLC v. NLRB - Second Circuit Opinion on Unfair Labor Practice Proceedings

The Second Circuit affirmed a district court's denial of a preliminary injunction sought by Care One LLC and affiliated healthcare facilities. The facilities challenged NLRB proceedings, arguing the ALJ was improperly appointed and shielded from removal. The appellate court found the plaintiffs could not demonstrate irreparable harm, thus denying the injunction.

Court Rules on Noncitizen Removal Proceedings Deadline

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals granted a petition challenging the Board of Immigration Appeals' denial of a motion to reopen removal proceedings. The court remanded the case, finding the BIA provided insufficient reasons for denying equitable tolling of the 90-day deadline for filing such motions.

US v Boria - Cocaine and Firearm Conviction Appeal

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Steve Boria for conspiring to distribute cocaine and possessing a firearm. Boria argued the district court erred by not sufficiently inquiring into the effects of his medication during his plea colloquy.

US v. Cardenas - Court of Appeals Decision on Cocaine Importation Conspiracy

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the conviction of Jey James Roldan Cardenas for conspiracy to import cocaine. The court found that the district court erred in excluding evidence relevant to Roldan's defense of lacking criminal intent, remanding the case for further proceedings.

Appeals Court Rules on Defendant's Trial Competency

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's order extending a defendant's hospitalization beyond the initial four-month period while the government determined whether to seek civil commitment. The ruling clarifies the application of statutes governing competency to stand trial.

Duke v. Luxottica - ERISA Class Action Appeal

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on an ERISA class action against Luxottica. The court held that a former employee has standing to seek plan reformation but not monetary payments to the plan under Section 502(a)(2), and that the effective vindication doctrine precludes mandatory arbitration of that claim.

Second Circuit Rules on Loan Agreement Arbitration Violation

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on a dispute between Lanesborough 2000, LLC and Nextres, LLC regarding an arbitration award. The court found the contractual waiver of the right to appeal ambiguous and partially affirmed the district court's judgment, while vacating the injunction of a state-court proceeding.

Second Circuit Rules on Insurance Contract Case

The Second Circuit affirmed a district court ruling that Reidy Contracting Group was an additional insured under Mt. Hawley Insurance Company's policy. The court held that the Employers Liability Exclusion was ambiguous and must be construed against Mt. Hawley, requiring coverage for injuries sustained by workers at a construction site.

McGucken v. Shutterstock, Inc. - Copyright Infringement Appeal

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals partially affirmed and partially vacated a lower court's decision in McGucken v. Shutterstock, Inc. The court affirmed the dismissal of copyright management information claims but vacated the dismissal of copyright infringement claims, remanding for further proceedings.

Mar-Can Transport Co. v. Local 854 Pension Fund - ERISA Withdrawal Liability

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision in Mar-Can Transport Co. v. Local 854 Pension Fund, ruling that Mar-Can is entitled to a $1.8 million reduction in its withdrawal liability under ERISA. The court interpreted a key provision regarding the transfer of unfunded vested benefits when employees switch unions.

Court of Appeals rules on housing discrimination case

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on a housing discrimination case involving CoreLogic Rental Property Solutions. The court vacated in part, affirmed in part, and reversed in part the district court's decision, impacting claims related to the Fair Housing Act and the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

United States v. William Jimenez - Sentencing Appeal

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's sentencing of William Jimenez to 105 months imprisonment and three years of supervised release. Jimenez appealed specific conditions of his supervised release and his sentence term, but the court found no abuse of discretion and upheld the appeal waiver.

Safdieh v. Commissioner - Tax Court Summary Judgment Vacated

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a Tax Court order that granted summary judgment to Joseph Safdieh, ruling that the Commissioner of Internal Revenue may assess penalties under I.R.C. § 6038(b) for failing to report foreign business control. The court remanded the case for further proceedings.

SBK ART LLC v. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP - Discovery for Foreign Litigation

The Second Circuit affirmed a district court's order granting SBK ART LLC's petition for discovery under 28 U.S.C. §1782 for use in foreign litigation. The court disagreed with Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP's argument that discovery should be denied if not discoverable from the foreign client.

OFAC Designates Rwanda Defence Force and Officials; Issues General License

The US Treasury's OFAC has designated the Rwanda Defence Force and four Rwandan officials under its Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) List for actions related to the Democratic Republic of the Congo. OFAC also issued DRC-related General License 1 to authorize the wind-down of transactions involving the Rwanda Defence Force.

NY AG Releases Top 10 Consumer Complaints and Fraud Categories of 2025

New York Attorney General Letitia James released the top 10 consumer complaints received in 2025, highlighting fraud in retail, housing, automobile, internet, and banking. The notice also provides tips for consumers to avoid scams and urges reporting of fraudulent practices.

Com. v. Ishler - Criminal Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a non-precedential opinion affirming the dismissal of George Gene Ishler Jr.'s second PCRA petition. The court found that Ishler's claims did not meet the exceptions to the PCRA's one-year time bar.

Com. v. Metzgar - Criminal Sentencing Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court affirmed the judgment of sentence for Ralph Metzgar, who appealed the discretionary aspects of his sentence for rape by forcible compulsion. The court also granted counsel's petition to withdraw. The appeal concerns a non-precedential decision.

Polito J v Polito W - Custody Dispute Appeal

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued a non-precedential decision in the case of Polito J v Polito W. The court found partial merit in the appellant's argument regarding the trial court's failure to rule on a contempt petition, leading to the appeal being quashed as interlocutory.

BIS Fines Teledyne FLIR $1M for Unlicensed China Exports

The U.S. Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) settled with Teledyne FLIR for $1,000,000 over alleged violations of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR). The violations involved unlicensed exports of thermal imaging cameras to China and miscalculations under the de minimis rule.

Johns Manville Corp. v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co. - Insurance Indemnity Dispute

The District Court of Colorado issued an order in the insurance indemnity dispute between Johns Manville Corporation and several insurance companies. The court granted the defendants' motion to exclude a threshold motion on the duty to indemnify from the court's "one summary judgment" rule and granted their request to bifurcate and stay proceedings.

Farmworkers' $1M Settlement Claims Process Opens

The Washington Attorney General's Office has opened the claims process for a $1 million settlement benefiting farmworkers who worked for Cornerstone Ranches, Orchards, or Farm Management. The settlement resolves allegations of discrimination against local and female farmworkers.

Court Opinion Denies Father's Custody Petition Based on Home State

The Tennessee Court of Appeals vacated a juvenile court's order denying a father's custody petition. The court found that the juvenile court's order denying review failed to comply with state statute regarding the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA). The case is remanded for further proceedings.

Federal Register Public Inspection Document Search

The Federal Register is providing a prototype website for searching proposed and final rules from US agencies. This site is an unofficial informational resource and does not replace the official print or electronic versions until granted official legal status by the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register.

Court opinion release date disclaimer and modification notice

Court opinion release date disclaimer and modification notice

Court opinion publication, modification, and filing deadlines explained

Court opinion publication, modification, and filing deadlines explained

Court opinion release date, modification, and publication process explained

Court opinion release date, modification, and publication process explained

Court opinion release dates and modifications explained

Court opinion release dates and modifications explained

Court opinion release and modification procedures explained

Court opinion release and modification procedures explained

Court opinion release dates and modification disclaimer

Court opinion release dates and modification disclaimer

Court opinion release dates and publication procedures explained

Court opinion release dates and publication procedures explained

Court opinions: release dates, modifications, and filing periods explained

Court opinions: release dates, modifications, and filing periods explained

Legal opinion release and modification procedures explained

Legal opinion release and modification procedures explained

Connecticut court opinion release and modification procedures explained

Connecticut court opinion release and modification procedures explained

Divorce judgment awards primary child responsibility

Divorce judgment awards primary child responsibility

Kostelecky v. Erickson: Parenting Responsibility Ruling

Kostelecky v. Erickson: Parenting Responsibility Ruling

State v. Romanyshyn criminal appeal remanded with instructions

State v. Romanyshyn criminal appeal remanded with instructions

North Dakota Supreme Court dismisses Bobcat appeal

North Dakota Supreme Court dismisses Bobcat appeal

State v. Vasquez criminal appeal affirmed by ND Supreme Court

State v. Vasquez criminal appeal affirmed by ND Supreme Court

Morgensen v. Pullin: Ohio court had jurisdiction, arguments meritless

Morgensen v. Pullin: Ohio court had jurisdiction, arguments meritless

Juvenile court terminates parental rights for autistic child

Juvenile court terminates parental rights for autistic child

Ohio Court of Appeals opinion: State v. Bullock

Ohio Court of Appeals opinion: State v. Bullock

Receiver's breach of fiduciary claims against directors rejected settlement

Receiver's breach of fiduciary claims against directors rejected settlement

Court denies motion for relief from judgment

Court denies motion for relief from judgment

Juvenile court found parent unsuitable based on evidence

Juvenile court found parent unsuitable based on evidence

Court reverses dismissal of claims against Nestle Purina

Court reverses dismissal of claims against Nestle Purina

Custody case motion denied, opinion affirmed

Custody case motion denied, opinion affirmed

Eskew v. Luhmann: Cow injury case affirmed

Eskew v. Luhmann: Cow injury case affirmed

Court opinion: Raygor vs. Stewart & Associates, March 2

Court opinion: Raygor vs. Stewart & Associates, March 2

Minnesota court opinion filed March 2, 2026

Minnesota court opinion filed March 2, 2026

Court opinion: This Little Piggy Catering vs Historic John P. Furber Farm

Court opinion: This Little Piggy Catering vs Historic John P. Furber Farm

Minnesota Court of Appeals opinion filed March 2, 2026

Minnesota Court of Appeals opinion filed March 2, 2026

Gagnon v. Gagnon: Minnesota Court of Appeals opinion filed March 2, 2026

Gagnon v. Gagnon: Minnesota Court of Appeals opinion filed March 2, 2026

Minnesota Court of Appeals opinion affirmed March 2, 2026

Minnesota Court of Appeals opinion affirmed March 2, 2026

Minnesota Court of Appeals Opinion filed March 2, 2026

Minnesota Court of Appeals Opinion filed March 2, 2026

Cronquist v. State: Reversed and remanded March 2, 2026

Cronquist v. State: Reversed and remanded March 2, 2026

Court opinion affirmed Richard L. Greenstreet case March 2

Court opinion affirmed Richard L. Greenstreet case March 2

Court of Appeals affirms Erling v. Wells Fargo Bank opinion

Court of Appeals affirms Erling v. Wells Fargo Bank opinion

Medtronic Inc. respondents, AlphaTec Spine Inc. appellant opinion filed March 2, 2026

Medtronic Inc. respondents, AlphaTec Spine Inc. appellant opinion filed March 2, 2026

Court opinion affirms motion denial for civil commitment

Court opinion affirms motion denial for civil commitment

Court opinion denies motion in marriage case

Court opinion denies motion in marriage case

Minnesota court opinion filed March 2, 2026

Minnesota court opinion filed March 2, 2026

State v. Aguilar - Non-Precedential Opinion

The New Mexico Supreme Court issued a non-precedential opinion affirming the convictions of Precious Aguilar for accessory to murder, conspiracy, accessory to kidnapping, accessory to aggravated battery, and tampering with evidence. The court found sufficient evidence and rejected claims of prosecutorial misconduct.

State v. Urquidi-Martinez - Criminal Sexual Penetration Double Jeopardy

The New Mexico Supreme Court reviewed a Court of Appeals decision vacating two convictions for criminal sexual penetration (CSP) on double jeopardy grounds. The court reversed the Court of Appeals regarding one conviction, reinstating it.

State v. Benavidez - New Mexico Supreme Court Opinion

The New Mexico Supreme Court has issued an opinion in State v. Benavidez, concerning a defendant convicted of first-degree murder and tampering with evidence. The appeal raises issues regarding parole term legality, sufficiency of evidence for intent, jury instructions on provocation, prosecutorial misconduct, and double jeopardy.

State v. Skeets - New Mexico Supreme Court Opinion

The New Mexico Supreme Court dismissed the State's interlocutory appeal in State v. Skeets, finding it lacked jurisdiction. The Court held that the district court's order discharging the defendant for lack of probable cause was not a final, appealable order.

State v. Valencia - New Mexico Supreme Court Opinion

The New Mexico Supreme Court has granted a motion for rehearing in State v. Valencia, withdrawing its prior opinion filed July 14, 2025. The court will issue a substituted opinion addressing the defendant's challenges to his convictions for murder and attempted murder, including claims related to jury instructions on diminished capacity and double jeopardy.

Armstrong v. State - Habeas Corpus Appeal

The Court of Appeals of Kansas affirmed the dismissal of Daryl Wayne Armstrong Jr.'s second motion for postconviction relief. Armstrong sought to overturn his sex crime convictions, but the court found his claims were conclusory and the motion was successive, failing to show exceptional circumstances.

Johnson v. State - Kansas Appeals Court Opinion

The Kansas Court of Appeals dismissed an appeal filed by Rheuben Johnson. The court found it lacked appellate jurisdiction because Johnson failed to file a timely notice of appeal after his K.S.A. 60-1507 motion was summarily denied by the district court.

In re C.D. - Termination of Parental Rights

The Kansas Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision to terminate a mother's parental rights to her son, C.D. The court found the evidence sufficient to support the termination based on the mother's unfitness and the likelihood of its continuation, concluding that termination was in the child's best interests.

State v. McLeroy - Probation Revocation Appeal

The Kansas Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision to revoke Shywanna N. McLeroy's probation and impose her prison sentences. McLeroy had admitted to violating probation conditions twice, leading to the revocation and denial of her sentence modification request.

State v. Hekekia-Dixon - Criminal Appeal

The Kansas Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision in State v. Hekekia-Dixon, ruling that the defendant was not entitled to jail credit for time served in an unrelated case. The court found that the precedent set in State v. Ervin did not apply to the specific facts of this case.

State v. Waters - Criminal Appeal Affirmed

The Louisiana Court of Appeal affirmed the conviction of David Wilson Waters for two counts of molestation of a juvenile. The court addressed issues of insufficient evidence, illegal sentencing due to a miscited statute, and excessive sentences. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the trial court's judgment.

State of Louisiana v. Sirelderick Deon Hays - Criminal Appeal

The Louisiana Court of Appeal affirmed the convictions and sentences of Sirelderick Deon Hays. Hays was convicted of manslaughter, armed robbery, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. The court denied his motions for post-verdict judgment of acquittal and for a new trial.

Louisiana Court of Appeal Opinion on Succession Case

The Louisiana Court of Appeal issued an opinion regarding the succession of Emerick Mitchel Guillot. The court denied a stay and a writ in this case, identified by docket number 2026 CW 0144.

State of Louisiana v. Namicha Lacey - Court of Appeal Opinion

The Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit, issued an opinion in State of Louisiana v. Namicha Lacey. The court denied a request for rehearing, citing procedural rules regarding the timeliness of such applications and the denial of the original writ application.

State of Louisiana v. $12,039 U.S. Currency - Forfeiture Affirmation

The Louisiana Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court's ruling granting the State's motion for summary judgment for forfeiture of $12,039 in U.S. currency seized from Delancey R. Kent. The currency was alleged to be proceeds from street-level narcotics sales.

State v. Guillen-Alegre - Nonprecedential Opinion Affirmed

The Oregon Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Jonathan Guillen-Alegre for third-degree sexual abuse. The court found the evidence legally sufficient for a rational trier of fact to have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.

State v. K. W. - Oregon Court of Appeals Reverses Commitment Order

The Oregon Court of Appeals reversed a judgment committing an individual for mental illness and prohibiting firearm possession. The court found plain error in the trial court's failure to advise the appellant of all possible hearing results and in not dismissing the case after a delay in proceedings. The state conceded the error.

Khosroabadi v. North Clackamas Parks and Rec. Dist. - Reversed and Remanded

The Oregon Court of Appeals reversed and remanded a lower court's decision in Khosroabadi v. North Clackamas Parks and Rec. Dist. The court found that the city council could unilaterally withdraw from the intergovernmental agreement with the district, contrary to the trial court's ruling.

State v. R. K. D. - Civil Commitment Appeal

The Oregon Court of Appeals affirmed a civil commitment order for R. K. D. The court found that the state met the legal standard for commitment based on the individual being a person with mental illness and dangerous to others. The disposition was affirmed on February 25, 2026.

Perez Ruiz and Perez Machado - Income Redetermination

The Oregon Court of Appeals reversed and remanded a family court's decision regarding spousal and child support. The court found that the father's business expenses were not properly accounted for in determining his income, requiring a redetermination.

Montana Supreme Court v. Montana Attorney General - Ballot Issue Review

The Montana Supreme Court reversed the Attorney General's determination that Ballot Issue 8 was legally insufficient. The Court found the ballot issue constitutes a single constitutional amendment and that the Attorney General lacked statutory authority to append a fiscal statement. The case is docketed as OP 25-0858.

State v. Johnson - Criminal Appeal

The Montana Supreme Court affirmed the conviction of Stephen Joseph Johnson for Criminal Mischief, Burglary, and Bail Jumping. The appeal concerned whether the District Court violated Johnson's right of confrontation by allowing a witness to testify via two-way videoconferencing.

State v. D. Matt - Montana Supreme Court Appeal

The Montana Supreme Court vacated and remanded in part the case of State v. Darrin William Matt. The appeal concerned Matt's sentence for felony Assault on a Peace Officer. The court will review issues related to sentencing and alleged police misconduct.

Rodriguez v. State - Montana Supreme Court Affirmance

The Montana Supreme Court affirmed the denial of a petition for postconviction relief for Juan Anastasio Rodriguez. The court's decision, designated as non-precedential, upholds a prior conviction for sexual intercourse without consent.

Marriage of Cool - Family Law Appeal

The Montana Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's decision regarding a parenting plan in the Marriage of Cool case. The court found no clear error in the district court's findings and no abuse of discretion in its weighing of best-interests factors. This decision does not serve as precedent.

Norman Horton v. David Colvin - Defamation Lawsuit Opinion

The Alabama Court of Civil Appeals issued an opinion in the defamation lawsuit Norman Horton v. David Colvin. The case involves allegations of defamation through social media posts and statements made at a political meeting, as well as claims of election interference and business interference.

Premier Choice Realty v. Arthur Lumpkin - Court Opinion

The Alabama Court of Civil Appeals ruled that transmitting a notice of appeal electronically does not constitute a proper filing under state law. The court dismissed an appeal filed by Premier Choice Realty & Investments, Inc. due to improper electronic filing of the notice of appeal.

Alabama DHR v. Eternal Life Learning Center - Child Care Subsidy Program

The Alabama Court of Civil Appeals reversed a lower court's decision, reinstating the Alabama Department of Human Resources' (ADHR) final decision to terminate Eternal Life Learning Center from the Child Care Subsidy Program. The court agreed with ADHR's interpretation of the "90-day rule" regarding facility compliance.

BISCO Refractories, Inc. v. Wesley Dean - Workers' Compensation Appeal

The Alabama Court of Civil Appeals reviewed a trial court's decision awarding permanent-total-disability benefits to an employee under the Alabama Workers' Compensation Act. The employer appealed, arguing the award was not supported by substantial evidence. The appellate court reversed the trial court's judgment.

McCartha v. Duren - Divorce Appeal

The Alabama Court of Civil Appeals issued an opinion in the divorce appeal case of Savannah Michele McCartha v. Destini Love Duren. The opinion is dated February 27, 2026, and pertains to an appeal from a divorce judgment.

State of Alabama v. Abraham Hatch - Criminal Appeal

The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals is reviewing a pretrial order from the Mobile Circuit Court that refused to admit the out-of-court statements of a child witness as substantive evidence. The State of Alabama is appealing this decision, arguing it was erroneous under state law.

State of Alabama v. Kala Blakely and Bartley Evan Blakely - Criminal Appeal

The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals reversed a lower court's order suppressing evidence in the case of State v. Kala Blakely and Bartley Evan Blakely. The appellate court found that the evidence, including text messages and information obtained via a search warrant, should not have been suppressed under the 'fruit of the poisonous tree' doctrine.

M.C. v. State of Alabama - Criminal Appeals Opinion

The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals issued an opinion in M.C. v. State of Alabama, concerning a juvenile adjudicated delinquent for making a terrorist threat. The court reviewed the sufficiency of the evidence presented for the adjudication.

Warren Terrell Hardy v. State of Alabama - Criminal Appeal

The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals issued an opinion regarding the criminal case of Warren Terrell Hardy v. State of Alabama. The court addressed Hardy's convictions for capital murder, kidnapping, domestic violence, and discharging a firearm into an occupied vehicle, including his death sentence.

William Kiwanis Carroll v. State of Alabama - Criminal Appeal

The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals reversed William Kiwanis Carroll's conviction for provocation manslaughter and his 10-year sentence. The court found that the trial court erred in admitting evidence of prior alleged misconduct.

Juan Cerano v. State of Tennessee - Double Jeopardy Appeal

The Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals dismissed Juan Cerano's appeal concerning his double jeopardy claim and conviction merger. The court found the appeal was filed late and did not warrant a waiver of the timely filing requirement, thus affirming the trial court's dismissal.

Cunningham v. Virginia - Criminal Conviction Affirmation

The Court of Appeals of Virginia affirmed a trial court's decision, finding sufficient evidence for a jury to convict Adam Ross Cunningham of attempted strangulation, attempted abduction, and assault and battery. The court also found no abuse of discretion in allowing testimony of subsequent acts of violence against the same victim.

Mitchell v. Jamil - Deed of Trust Action

The Court of Appeals of Virginia affirmed a trial court's judgment awarding compensatory damages in a deed of trust action. The court found clear and convincing evidence of an agreement to modify the note's terms through the parties' course of dealings and waiver, and that the statute of frauds claim was waived.

J.N.W. v. Commonwealth of Virginia - Affirmance of Judgment

The Court of Appeals of Virginia affirmed a trial court's judgment, denying a motion to suppress a confession and excluding expert testimony. The court found that any error in denying the motion to suppress was harmless due to independent evidence of guilt.

Holland Coleman v. Pamela Coleman - Property Settlement Unconscionable

The Court of Appeals of Virginia affirmed a trial court's decision to set aside a property settlement agreement as unconscionable. The court found a gross disparity in asset division and evidence of overreaching. The judgment was affirmed, and a challenge to a related order was waived.

7147 Mechanicsville Turnpike, L.L.C. v. Board of Supervisors of Hanover County

The Court of Appeals of Virginia affirmed a trial court's decision in a zoning dispute involving 7147 Mechanicsville Turnpike, L.L.C. and the Board of Supervisors of Hanover County. The court found no error in the trial court's rulings regarding the denial of a rezoning application and the sustaining of a demurrer.

Wharton v. State - Probation Extension Consent Ruling

The Maryland Court of Special Appeals ruled that an illegal probation extension, even if consented to by the defendant, is void. The court found that while a defendant may consent to probation terms, they cannot consent to illegal conditions, and violations under such an extension are invalid. This ruling impacts how probation extensions with impermissible conditions are handled in Maryland courts.

Kyere v. Durand - Arbitration Agreement

The Court of Special Appeals of Maryland addressed whether a non-signatory agent can enforce an arbitration agreement. The court affirmed that doctors employed by a hospital had standing to compel arbitration under an employment agreement, citing interdependent misconduct and agency.

Bailey v. Happer - SAFE ACT Retroactive Application

The Maryland Court of Special Appeals ruled in Bailey v. Happer that the SAFE Act may not be applied retroactively, but conduct predating the statute can be considered. The court affirmed a $395,310 award for financial exploitation.

Reid v. Balt. Ambulatory Center - Expert Witness Qualifications in Health Care Malpractice

The Maryland Court of Special Appeals ruled that an anesthesiologist can provide expert testimony on the standard of care for a gastroenterologist's post-procedure assessment, provided the specialties are related and the issue overlaps. This clarifies expert witness qualification requirements under the Health Care Malpractice Claims Act.

In re Holder - Collateral Estoppel in Insurance Regulatory Scheme

The Maryland Court of Special Appeals ruled that administrative hearings under the Insurance Article can have collateral estoppel effects on later proceedings, clarifying the application of collateral estoppel to regulatory schemes. The court also addressed the good faith requirement for claim denials and the separation of civil claims from judicial review petitions.

Rosales v. Elevate PFS Holdings, Inc. - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, Rosales v. Elevate PFS Holdings, Inc., was filed on February 27, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a Notice of Removal from Alameda County Superior Court and includes initial filings such as a Corporate Disclosure Statement and Certificate of Interested Entities.

Forks v. Trans Union LLC - Consumer Credit Case

A new civil case, Forks v. Trans Union LLC, was filed on February 27, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves consumer credit and was removed from state court. Trans Union LLC is the defendant.

Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Tucker - Attorney Discipline

The Maryland Court of Appeals has suspended Charles T. Tucker, Jr. for six months from the practice of law, effective March 23, 2026. The disciplinary action stems from violations of Virginia Rules of Professional Conduct.

Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Wagner - Attorney Discipline

The Maryland Court of Appeals has reprimanded attorney Brenda C. Wagner. This action follows a public censure in the District of Columbia for violating professional conduct rules. The Court denied Wagner's motion for an extension of time to respond to the disciplinary petition.

Maryland Supreme Court: State v. Stone - Traffic Stop Reasonable Suspicion

The Maryland Supreme Court ruled that observing a driver manipulating a mobile phone is insufficient on its own to establish reasonable suspicion for a traffic stop. The court clarified that police must identify specific facts, beyond general lawful phone use, to reasonably believe a traffic violation has occurred.

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Jones - Reinstatement Order

The Maryland Court of Appeals granted the Attorney Grievance Commission's motion to reinstate Gregory Wayne Jones and dismiss the disciplinary petition. This order restores Mr. Jones to good standing and permits him to practice law in Maryland.

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Hamilton - Attorney Misconduct

The Maryland Court of Appeals has disbarred attorney Judith Marie Hamilton for multiple violations of professional conduct rules, including incompetence, lack of diligence, communication failures, and misconduct during an investigation. The disciplinary action stems from her representation in a divorce case and her failure to cooperate with Bar Counsel.

State vs. Dustin Curtis Winter - Criminal Appeal

The Missouri Supreme Court issued an opinion in the case of State vs. Dustin Curtis Winter. The court affirmed in part and vacated and remanded in part Winter's convictions for first-degree murder and kidnapping. The matter is remanded solely to correct the written judgment to align with the oral pronouncement of sentences.

Missouri Supreme Court - Planned Parenthood Abortion Statutes Case

The Missouri Supreme Court transferred a case involving Planned Parenthood's challenge to state abortion statutes to the court of appeals. The court found it lacked exclusive appellate jurisdiction over the preliminary injunction ruling, which partially enjoined certain abortion-related laws following a constitutional amendment.

Christopher A. Scott v. State of Missouri - Postconviction Relief Appeal

The Supreme Court of Missouri affirmed the denial of postconviction relief for Christopher A. Scott. The court found that Scott's amended motion did not challenge the original pro se claim, leading to the affirmation of the lower court's judgment.

Estate of David Carter vs. Missouri Dept. of Corrections - Appeal Dismissed

The Supreme Court of Missouri dismissed an appeal in the case of Estate of David Carter vs. Missouri Department of Corrections. The appeal was dismissed because the judgment was not considered final, as it failed to rule on requested equitable relief and prejudgment interest.

Kevin Rhodes v. Missouri Highways and Transportation Commission - Appeal Dismissed

The Supreme Court of Missouri dismissed an appeal in the case of Kevin Rhodes v. Missouri Highways and Transportation Commission. The appeal was dismissed because the circuit court's judgment was not considered final, as it failed to rule on the request for equitable relief and prejudgment interest. The case involved claims of hostile work environment and retaliation under the Missouri Human Rights Act.

Evangelia Bilalis v. Wallace Drennan and Zurich American Insurance Company

The Supreme Court of Louisiana affirmed lower court rulings in Evangelia Bilalis v. Wallace Drennan and Zurich American Insurance Company. The court determined that legal interest accrues from the date of judicial demand, even if a judgment incorrectly states a different date.

Ngoc Troung v. Marcus Dewayne Sanders and Old American Indemnity Company

The Louisiana Supreme Court affirmed in part and reversed in part a lower court's decision regarding property damage claims. The court ruled that a tortfeasor is not entitled to deduct for betterment in a victim's property damage claim for a vehicle, affirming the appellate court's decision. However, the court reversed the award of penalties, deeming it not warranted for this legal issue of first impression.

Lealon Johnson v. Aecom Amentum Government Services - Workers' Compensation

The Louisiana Supreme Court affirmed and remanded the case of Lealon Johnson v. Aecom Amentum Government Services. The court addressed legal issues regarding the timeliness of workers' compensation claims, particularly when an employer continues full salary payments without an initial wage loss.

Dwayne Williams v. State of Louisiana - Wrongful Conviction Compensation

The Louisiana Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's decision in Dwayne Williams v. State of Louisiana. The case concerns compensation for wrongful conviction and imprisonment under state law, and the court's ruling addresses the procedural stay of proceedings related to a federal civil rights action.

Louisiana Supreme Court Suspends Attorney Henry L. Klein

The Louisiana Supreme Court has suspended attorney Henry L. Klein from the practice of law, effective December 18, 2025. This action follows a disciplinary proceeding initiated by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel and adds to Klein's extensive prior disciplinary history, including previous suspensions.

James Blakemore v. Commonwealth of Kentucky - Criminal Appeal

The Kentucky Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's decision denying James Blakemore's motion to withdraw his guilty plea. The court found the plea was entered knowingly and voluntarily, and that claims of ineffective assistance of counsel were unsubstantiated by the record. The opinion is designated as non-precedential.

Wayne M. Haggard v. Commonwealth of Kentucky - Affirming Murder Conviction

The Kentucky Supreme Court affirmed the conviction of Wayne M. Haggard for Murder, who was sentenced to twenty-eight years of incarceration. This memorandum opinion is designated as non-precedential and cannot be cited as binding precedent.

Thomas R. Moore v. Commonwealth of Kentucky - Criminal Appeal

The Kentucky Supreme Court issued a modified opinion affirming the resentencing of Thomas R. Moore to 20 years imprisonment. The court addressed whether Moore was competent for resentencing and if the trial court erred in its sentencing decision, ultimately affirming the lower court's ruling.

Christine Nicole Falconite v. Shed Wise, LLC - Workers' Compensation Appeal

The Kentucky Supreme Court affirmed a decision that Christine Nicole Falconite was an independent contractor, not an employee, of Shed Wise, LLC. The court's memorandum opinion designated the decision as non-precedential.

Kentucky Supreme Court Opinion: AG v. Council for Better Education

The Kentucky Supreme Court issued an opinion affirming a lower court's decision in the case of Attorney General Russell Coleman v. Council for Better Education, Inc. The ruling addresses the constitutional mandate for education funding in Kentucky, referencing historical precedents and the fundamental right to education.

State v. Beck - Modified Opinion

The Kansas Supreme Court issued a modified opinion in State v. Beck, addressing whether license plate frames obstructing the state name violate state law. The court reversed the lower court's decision, finding that law enforcement lacked reasonable suspicion for a traffic stop based solely on an obstructed state name on a license plate.

State v. Thille - Supreme Court of Kansas Legal Opinion

The Supreme Court of Kansas issued a legal opinion in the case of State v. Thille, addressing issues related to imperfect self-defense and voluntary manslaughter instructions. The court affirmed the judgment of the Court of Appeals, which had affirmed the district court's conviction of the appellant for reckless second-degree murder.

Kansas Supreme Court Rules on Illegal Sentence Motion

The Kansas Supreme Court ruled on a motion to correct an illegal sentence in State v. Brown. The court affirmed that a defendant cannot use such a motion to raise a constitutional claim and clarified the limits of liberal construction for pro se pleadings. The court also vacated a portion of the sentence related to postrelease supervision.

Kansas Supreme Court Reinstates Linda S. Dickens' Law License

The Kansas Supreme Court has reinstated Linda S. Dickens' law license, which was indefinitely suspended in 2019. The court adopted the recommendation of the Kansas Board for Discipline of Attorneys following a reinstatement hearing. Dickens must satisfy administrative requirements before her name is added to the active roster of attorneys.

State v. Ross - Kansas Supreme Court Opinion on Case Consolidation

The Kansas Supreme Court issued an opinion in State v. Ross, addressing case consolidation under K.S.A. 22-3202(1) and K.S.A. 22-3203. The court reversed a Court of Appeals decision regarding consolidation and affirmed the district court's judgment.

Henshaw v. State of Alabama - Supreme Court Opinion

The Supreme Court of Alabama issued an opinion in Henshaw v. State of Alabama, addressing appeals related to a protection-from-abuse case and a domestic-abuse charge. The court dismissed one appeal and transferred another to the Court of Criminal Appeals.

Tim Cloud v. Continental Roofing Company, LLC - Petition for Writ of Mandamus

The Supreme Court of Alabama denied Continental Roofing Company, LLC's petition for a writ of mandamus. Continental sought to have the Etowah Circuit Court's order denying its motion to dismiss for improper venue vacated. The court found the venue to be proper.

Smitherman v. Roberts - Employment Dispute Appeal

The Alabama Supreme Court issued an opinion in Smitherman v. Roberts, an employment dispute involving a former teacher and the Department of Youth Services (DYS). The court reversed and remanded the lower court's judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Derrick Roberts.

Kinsman Investments LLC v. Alfa Mutual Insurance Company - Mandamus Petition

The Supreme Court of Alabama granted a petition for a writ of mandamus, directing the Mobile Circuit Court to set aside its order denying summary judgment. The case involves claims by Kinsman Investments LLC against Alfa Mutual Insurance Company and its adjuster, Jeffery Dimoff, regarding insurance payouts after Hurricane Katrina.

Jackie Walter v. Branch Hays Farm SC Associates, LP, and Hudson Construction Company

The Supreme Court of Alabama affirmed a summary judgment against Jackie Walter in her slip-and-fall case against Branch Hays Farm SC Associates, LP, and Hudson Construction Company. The court found the hazard was open and obvious as a matter of law.

Ballard Spahr LLP v. Official Committee of Equity Security Holders - Seventh Circuit Opinion

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision in Ballard Spahr LLP v. Official Committee of Equity Security Holders. The court ruled that the debtor, Greenpoint Tactical Income Fund LLC, was not liable for legal fees incurred by its managing member, Michael Hull, in relation to SEC and DOJ investigations.

Johnnie Russell v. Ryan Comstock - Civil Rights Appeal

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion in the case of Johnnie Russell v. Ryan Comstock, concerning a civil rights appeal related to a Fourth Amendment violation claim. The court reviewed the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant police officers.

Nielsen v. Burke - Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Opinion

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion in Nielsen v. Burke, affirming in part and reversing in part a district court decision. The case involves a former inmate suing prison officials for failing to protect her from sexual assault. The court affirmed the denial of qualified immunity and the jury's finding of liability, awarding $19.3 million in damages.

Nielsen v. Macleod - Civil Rights Lawsuit Opinion

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion in Nielsen v. Macleod, affirming a jury's $19.3 million award against prison officials for violating an inmate's Eighth Amendment rights. The court upheld the denial of qualified immunity for the defendants.

Johnnie Russell v. Ryan Comstock - Civil Rights Appeal

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion in Johnnie Russell v. Ryan Comstock, concerning a civil rights lawsuit alleging Fourth Amendment violations. The court reviewed the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of police officers.

Jacqueline Gaines v. Denise Cross - First Amendment Employment Case

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's dismissal of a First Amendment claim filed by Jacqueline Gaines, a former magistrate judge. The court found that her termination for campaign speech that negatively portrayed the court did not violate her free speech rights, as she held a confidential position.

United States v. Lawrence Mark Sherman - Court Opinion

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Dr. Lawrence Mark Sherman for conspiring to distribute controlled substances and unlawful distribution. The court found no reversible error in the district court's proceedings or denial of a new trial motion. The case involved the operation of Tranquility Wellness Center and the unlawful distribution of opioid prescriptions.

LaFleur v. Yardi Systems, Inc. - Right of Publicity Claim

The Sixth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a right of publicity claim against Yardi Systems, Inc. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to allege that their identities carried distinct commercial value, a required element for such claims. This ruling impacts how individuals can assert privacy rights related to online data aggregation.

Ethan Ennes v. Presque Isle County, Michigan - Excessive Force Lawsuit

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision granting summary judgment to Presque Isle County and Deputy Dave Schmoldt in a lawsuit filed by Ethan Ennes. Ennes alleged excessive force and other claims stemming from an incident in a classroom. The court found no genuine dispute of material fact.

Wm. Powell Co. v. Ocean Marine Ins. Co. - Sixth Circuit Opinion

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a non-precedential opinion in Wm. Powell Co. v. Ocean Marine Ins. Co. The court vacated a district court's dismissal order and remanded the case for further proceedings concerning insurance policy coverage disputes dating back several decades.

Court Upholds Injunction Against South Dakota Election Law

The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a preliminary injunction against South Dakota's Senate Bill 180, which governs paid petition circulators. The court found the law likely violates the First Amendment by being overbroad and not narrowly tailored to election integrity.

United States v. Jeffrey Dixon - Criminal Sentencing Appeal

The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a revocation sentence for Jeffrey Dixon, finding the district court's familiarity with the record did not constitute plain error and the sentence was not substantively unreasonable. The court published its opinion on November 1, 2022.

Megan Green v. Cliff Sommer - Civil Rights Case Ruling

The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on the civil rights case Megan Green v. Cliff Sommer. The court partially affirmed the denial of qualified immunity for some officers involved in a tear gas incident during protests, while granting it for others and dismissing conspiracy claims.

Fatima Coreas-Chavez v. Merrick Garland - Immigration Petition Review

The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals denied an immigration petition for review in Fatima Coreas-Chavez v. Merrick Garland. The court found that the petitioners failed to demonstrate error in the Board of Immigration Appeals' decision regarding their fear of persecution, thus waiving their challenge.

Furlow v. Belmar - Civil Rights Challenge to St. Louis County Wanted System

The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on a civil rights case challenging St. Louis County's electronic wanted system. The court found that while a facial challenge to the system failed, one officer was not entitled to qualified immunity, and the municipal liability claim was dismissed.

CFHC v. CoreLogic Rental Prop Sols - Fair Housing Act Case

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated in part, affirmed in part, and reversed in part a district court decision concerning alleged violations of the Fair Housing Act and Fair Credit Reporting Act by CoreLogic Rental Property Solutions. The court found the Connecticut Fair Housing Center lacked standing and that CoreLogic did not cause housing denials based on criminal history, but affirmed a violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

Broadcast Music, Inc. v. North American Concert Promoters Association - Antitrust

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a district court's decision regarding music licensing fees set by Broadcast Music, Inc. (BMI) for the North American Concert Promoters Association (NACPA). The court found the imposed rates and expanded definition of gross revenues to be unreasonable and remanded the case for further proceedings.

SBK ART LLC v. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP - Discovery for Foreign Litigation

The Second Circuit affirmed a district court's order granting SBK ART LLC's petition for discovery in aid of foreign litigation under 28 U.S.C. §1782. The court disagreed with Akin Gump's argument that discovery should be denied if not discoverable from the foreign client abroad, upholding the district court's discretion.

United States v. Jimenez - Appeal of Sentencing Conditions

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed a district court's sentencing decision for William Jimenez. The court found that the special conditions of supervised release, including electronic device searches and mental health counseling, were adequately supported and that Jimenez's appeal waiver barred his challenge to his imprisonment term.

Safdieh v. Commissioner - Tax Penalties Assessment

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Commissioner of Internal Revenue may assess penalties for failing to report foreign business control under I.R.C. § 6038(b) through administrative assessment, overturning a Tax Court decision. This decision impacts how the IRS collects these specific penalties.

Funk v. Funk - Appeal of Arbitration Award Confirmation

The Utah Court of Appeals issued an opinion in Funk v. Funk, addressing an appeal from a district court's order confirming an arbitrator's temporary award. The court is considering summary disposition due to a lack of a final, appealable order.

State v. Revuelta - Utah Court of Appeals Opinion

The Utah Court of Appeals affirmed a defendant's convictions for possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute. The court found that the magistrate did not err in finding probable cause for the search warrant executed on the defendant's home.

State v. Alvarado-Rodriguez - Utah Court of Appeals Opinion

The Utah Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Aaron Alvarado-Rodriguez for sexually abusing his stepdaughter. The court ruled that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence of Alvarado-Rodriguez's prior abuse of another child.

Washington v. State - Postconviction Relief Appeal

The Utah Court of Appeals reversed the summary dismissal of two postconviction relief claims filed by Terry Wayne Washington, remanding the case for further proceedings. The court affirmed the denial of counsel and summary judgment on a third claim, as well as the failure to address a fourth claim.

MFRE v. Saratoga Springs - Eminent Domain Dispute

The Utah Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's denial of a motion to dismiss an eminent domain action filed by the City of Saratoga Springs against MFRE. The court found that the City satisfied its statutory disclosure and notice obligations prior to filing suit.

Jacobs v. State - First-Degree Manslaughter Conviction Upheld

The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals upheld the first-degree manslaughter conviction of James Wesley Jacobs, Jr. The court found no abuse of discretion in the jury instructions and affirmed the sentence of forty years imprisonment and a $10,000 fine.

Battee v. State - Conjoint Robbery Conviction Appeal

The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed a conjoint robbery conviction for Trymel Keith Battee. The appeal raised issues regarding the trial judge's potential conflict of interest due to seeking employment with the OSBI and the reliability of an in-court identification.

Pena v. State - Appeal from Drug Activity Conviction

The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed a drug activity conviction for Jesus Efren Pena. Pena was sentenced to eight years imprisonment and a $50,000 fine for acquiring proceeds from drug activity. The court found sufficient evidence to support the conviction.

Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals Adds Rule for Generative AI

The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals has adopted a new rule governing the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in drafting documents for court filings. The rule requires parties or counsel to verify the accuracy of any AI-generated content before filing.

Acosta v. State - Post-Conviction Relief Denial Affirmed

The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the denial of post-conviction relief for Victor Don Acosta. The court found that Acosta's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel were barred by res judicata and waiver, and that his application was untimely filed.

Salazar v. State of Texas - Mandamus Motion Denied

The Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District, denied Jesus R. Salazar's petition for a writ of mandamus. The court found that Salazar failed to establish entitlement to mandamus relief regarding his request to start the appeals process and appoint him an attorney.

Jake Erin Taylor v. State of Texas - Murder Case Affirmed

The Texas Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Jake Erin Taylor for murder. The court assessed his punishment at seventy years imprisonment and a $10,000 fine. The appeal challenged the sufficiency of the evidence regarding self-defense.

Castro v. State of Texas - Continuous Sexual Abuse of Child

The Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District, affirmed a lower court's judgment against Juan Alberto Castro. Castro was found guilty of continuous sexual abuse of a child and sentenced to thirty years confinement. The court addressed multiple issues raised by the appellant regarding prosecutorial misconduct, ineffective assistance of counsel, and evidentiary rulings.

Navigator Group v. Susan Davis Van Dyke - Oil & Gas Deed Interpretation

The Texas Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision in Navigator Group v. Susan Davis Van Dyke, interpreting a 1924 deed's mineral reservation. The court determined the reservation of "one-half of one-eighth" meant one-half of the grantors' mineral interest, not merely one-sixteenth of the total minerals.

Navigator Group v. Susan Davis Van Dyke - Oil & Gas Dispute

The Texas Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision in a dispute over a mineral reservation in a 1924 deed. The ruling clarifies ownership of mineral rights between successors of the original grantor and grantee.

A.R. Foods v. Carolina South Shore Construction - Legal Opinion

The Court of Appeals of South Carolina issued a non-precedential opinion in A.R. Foods, Inc. v. Carolina South Shore Construction, Inc. The court affirmed the circuit court's order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Carolina South Shore Construction, Inc. The opinion addresses claims of negligence, breach of contract, and breach of implied warranty of workmanlike service.

Dawson v. Pounds - South Carolina Court Opinion

The Court of Appeals of South Carolina issued a non-precedential opinion in Dawson v. Pounds, affirming a lower court's decision to uphold the validity of a will. The court found that the will was properly executed, even with a contested witness signature, as the notary's actions satisfied the requirements for a second witness.

State v. Jakavis Green - Non-Precedential Opinion

The Court of Appeals of South Carolina affirmed a lower court's decision in State v. Jakavis Green, denying a motion to suppress evidence. The court found that the officer had reasonable suspicion for the traffic stop based on a good-faith understanding of the statute, even if the statute was later challenged as vague.

Steve Lester v. State of South Carolina - Court Opinion

The Court of Appeals of South Carolina issued a non-precedential opinion affirming the circuit court's denial of a juvenile offender's motion to reconsider his life imprisonment sentence. The court found the motion was filed after the one-year deadline set forth in Aiken v. Byars.

Wright v. Duncan - Court of Appeals Opinion

The Court of Appeals of South Carolina reversed in part and affirmed in part a family court order concerning the termination of parental rights. The court found that termination of the mother's parental rights was in the best interests of the children, reversing the family court's decision on this matter.

Com. v. Gigee, S. - Criminal Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court affirmed a judgment of sentence in Com. v. Gigee, S. The court granted the appellant's counsel's petition to withdraw, finding the appeal to be wholly frivolous after an independent review of the record. The case involved charges of theft by deception and receiving stolen property.

Com. v. Atkinson - Criminal Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a non-precedential opinion in Com. v. Atkinson, addressing an appeal from a judgment of sentence following probation revocation. The court affirmed the sentence imposed by the municipal court.

CVS Pharmacy v. City of Philadelphia - Superior Court Opinion

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued an opinion in CVS Pharmacy v. City of Philadelphia, affirming an order that overruled the appellant pharmacies' preliminary objections. The case concerns the pharmacies' alleged failure to report quantities of Schedule II controlled substances to prevent diversion.

Liberty Property v. Kendal Heaton Assoc. - Contract Dispute

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania affirmed a lower court's order enforcing a settlement agreement between Liberty Property Limited Partnership and Kendall Heaton Associates, Inc. The dispute involved construction defects and cost overages for the Comcast Technology Center.

Clemmons v. Lehr - Appeal of Punitive Damages Award

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued a non-precedential decision regarding an appeal of a jury's punitive damages award. The court affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded the case concerning a $25,000,000 punitive damages award reduced to $1,000,000 by the trial court.

B.F. Cash v. Bureau of Driver Licensing - DUI Implied Consent

The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania affirmed a one-year driver's license suspension for a DUI arrestee who refused chemical testing. The court found the police had reasonable grounds to request the test and properly informed the appellant of the consequences of refusal under the Implied Consent Law.

K. Booth v. PPB - Parole Violation Appeal

The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania issued a non-precedential opinion in K. Booth v. PPB, affirming the Pennsylvania Parole Board's decision to recommit Booth as a Convicted Parole Violator. The court upheld the recalculation of his parole violation maximum date to April 6, 2026, based on new federal convictions.

S.G. Smith v. PPB - Parole Violation Appeal

The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania issued an opinion in S.G. Smith v. PPB, concerning a parolee's appeal of a parole board decision. The court addressed the recalculation of the parole violator maximum date and the denial of credit for confinement time. The court denied the petitioner's counsel's application to withdraw without prejudice.

Ivy Hill Congregation v. PA DHS - Non-Precedential Opinion

The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania issued a non-precedential opinion in Ivy Hill Congregation v. PA DHS. The court granted Ivy Hill's application for summary relief due to the Department of Human Services' failure to contest the application, without independently resolving the clergyman privilege issue.

M. Musser v. SEPTA - Court Opinion

The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania affirmed a trial court's judgment in the case of M. Musser v. SEPTA. The appellant alleged injury due to an aggressive bus restart, but the court found no negligence under the jerk and jolt doctrine.

Oklahoma Adoption Case: Father Appeals Order on Child Eligibility

The Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals reversed a trial court's order granting a petition to adjudicate a child eligible for adoption without the father's consent. The appellate court found the order lacked a necessary finding on the child's best interests, remanding the case for further proceedings.

Oklahoma Mother Appeals Termination of Parental Rights

The Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals affirmed a district court's order terminating a mother's parental rights to her child, J.S., Jr. The mother appealed, claiming insufficient notice of hearings and that termination was not in the child's best interest. The appellate court found notice was legally sufficient and termination was justified.

McCleary v. Nexstar Media Group - Defamation Appeal

The Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals affirmed a trial court's denial of Nexstar Media Group's motion to dismiss a defamation lawsuit. Nexstar mistakenly used a plaintiff's photograph in a news segment, and the court found the plaintiff met the threshold for fault required by the Oklahoma Citizen's Participation Act.

Parker v. Valliance Bank - Court Opinion

The Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals affirmed a judgment in favor of Valliance Bank in a case where customers alleged the bank negligently disclosed financial records. While the court found a violation of the Oklahoma Financial Privacy Act, it upheld the lower court's decision.

Vertical Exploration v. Americo Oil - Unitization Order Dispute

The Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals reversed a Corporation Commission order that dismissed an application to terminate a unitization order. The court held the Commission retains authority over its orders, even if the unitization plan includes an amendment provision. This decision remands the matter for further proceedings.

Dove v. Cincinnati Metro. Hous. Auth. - Political Subdivision Immunity Ruling

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision denying the Cincinnati Metropolitan Housing Authority's motion for summary judgment. The ruling concerns political subdivision immunity in a negligence claim related to the failure to install a requested grab-bar in a tenant's shower, which was deemed a physical defect.

Patituce v. Hein - Ohio Court of Appeals Opinion

The Ohio Court of Appeals issued an opinion in Patituce v. Hein, granting a writ of prohibition against Judge Jonathan Hein. The court found that the respondent judge lacked jurisdiction to proceed with a criminal case while a direct appeal was pending, and that the trial court's actions were not in aid of the appeal.

U.S. Bank v. Ballard - Court Lacks Jurisdiction on Standing Issue

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision in U.S. Bank v. Ballard, ruling that the court lacks jurisdiction to consider the issue of standing because it was previously determined to be moot. The court also affirmed that charges sought by U.S. Bank were not Fair Debt Collections Practice Act violations.

McManus v. Foster - Tax Foreclosure Appeal

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a default judgment in a tax foreclosure case, ruling that the appellant could not raise new issues on appeal that were not presented to the trial court. The court found the trial court provided adequate opportunity to respond to the complaint.

State v. Elston - Criminal Appeal

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a criminal conviction for Darryl Elston Jr. The court ruled that the appellant forfeited his right to testify by refusing to decide whether to testify and that his trial counsel was effective. The convictions were found to be supported by sufficient evidence.

Riemers v. State North Dakota Court of Appeals Opinion

The North Dakota Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's dismissal of a case brought by Roland Riemers against the State of North Dakota and several judges. The court found Riemers' claims regarding denial of legal and constitutional rights during divorce proceedings were barred by collateral estoppel and judicial immunity.

Riemers v. State - Child Support Enforcement Appeal

The North Dakota Court of Appeals affirmed a summary judgment dismissing Roland Riemers' claims against the State Child Support Enforcement Office. Riemers alleged various constitutional and legal rights violations related to child support arrearages, laws, interest charges, and alleged unconstitutional jailing.

Gosbee v. Martinson - RICO Action Appeal

The North Dakota Court of Appeals reversed a trial court's dismissal of a RICO action filed by John Gosbee against Rob Martinson and several companies. The court found that the trial court erred in dismissing the case without a hearing and in denying a motion to amend the complaint. The case involves allegations of fraudulent schemes to sell spyware.

Riemers v. State of North Dakota - Court Opinion

The North Dakota Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision dismissing Roland Riemers' challenge to a State Fair Association rule prohibiting solicitations except from paid concession locations. Riemers had sued, claiming the rule violated his free speech rights.

Riemers v. State - University of North Dakota Free Speech and Audit Rights

The North Dakota Court of Appeals partially reversed a lower court's dismissal of a case brought by Roland Riemers against the University of North Dakota (UND). The court affirmed the dismissal of Riemers' claim regarding auditing law school classes but reversed the dismissal of his claim concerning limitations on free speech activities on university property.

North Carolina Court of Appeals Opinion on Child Custody

The North Carolina Court of Appeals issued a non-precedential opinion in the case of In re B.C., A.B.W. The court reviewed child custody and permanency planning orders, affirming in part and vacating in part a lower court's decision regarding permanent custody of minor children.

State v. Villarreal - Criminal Law

The North Carolina Court of Appeals issued an opinion in State v. Villarreal, addressing a defendant's appeal of a second-degree murder conviction. The court found no error in the trial court's jury instructions regarding the aggressor doctrine.

In re E.J.T. - Termination of Parental Rights

The North Carolina Court of Appeals affirmed an order terminating a mother's parental rights to her son. The court found no error in the trial court's decision, upholding the termination based on the mother's failure to comply with court-ordered services and her admission of substance abuse.

State v. Wilson - Probation Revocation Appeal

The North Carolina Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's decision to revoke Felix Wilson Jr.'s probation due to a new criminal offense. The court found no meritorious issues upon independent examination of the record, upholding the activation of the underlying sentence.

Gill v. Tip Towing Inc. - Appellate Jurisdiction

The North Carolina Court of Appeals dismissed an appeal in Gill v. Tip Towing Inc. due to its interlocutory nature and the appellant's failure to demonstrate how the order affected a substantial right. The court cited the need for orders to affect a substantial right to be appealable before a final judgment.

Jose Castro v. Karina Frias - Discretionary Application Dismissed

The Court of Appeals of Georgia dismissed Jose Castro's discretionary application for appeal in the case Jose Castro v. Karina Frias. The dismissal was due to the application being filed untimely, more than 30 days after the entry of the trial court's order, violating jurisdictional deadlines.

Edward Conz v. L-Strategies, Inc. - Appeal Withdrawn

The Court of Appeals of Georgia has withdrawn the appeal in the case of Edward Conz, Jr. a/k/a Butch Conz v. L-Strategies, Inc. The appellant's motion to withdraw the appeal was granted, and jurisdiction has been released back to the trial court.

Schunk v. Toney - Appeal Dismissed

The Court of Appeals of Georgia dismissed the direct appeal filed by Tyler Christian Schunk against Makayla Brooke Toney. The dismissal was due to the appellant's failure to follow the required procedure for discretionary appeals in domestic relations cases.

People v. Adams (Selvin) - Criminal Procedure

The Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York reversed a conviction for harassment in the second degree against Selvin Adams. The court granted the defendant's speedy trial motion, vacating the plea and dismissing the accusatory instrument due to the People's failure to exercise due diligence in disclosure.

People v. Zeigler (Nalik) - Criminal Procedure

The Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York reversed a conviction for driving while impaired against Nalik Zeigler. The court found that the People's certificate of compliance was invalid due to a lack of due diligence in fulfilling discovery obligations, vacating the plea and dismissing the information.

New Century Fin. Servs. v. Rickenbacker - Default Judgment Appeal

The Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York affirmed a lower court's denial of a motion to vacate a default judgment. The court found that the defendant failed to establish lack of personal jurisdiction or provide a sufficient excuse for the default.

Demianchuk v Nostrand Photo Lab Inc. - Wage Dispute

The Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York modified a lower court's judgment in Demianchuk v. Nostrand Photo Lab Inc., increasing the plaintiff's awarded damages from $916.55 to $9,926.55. The court found the employer failed to pay minimum wage and violated Labor Law notification requirements.

Demianchuk v. Nostrand Photo Lab Inc. - Wage Dispute

The Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York modified a lower court's judgment in Demianchuk v. Nostrand Photo Lab Inc., increasing the plaintiff's awarded damages from $916.55 to $9,926.55. The court found the employer failed to pay minimum wage, improperly deducted wages, and violated notice requirements under Labor Law sections 195 and 198.

In re Abbott Laboratories, et al. - Preterm Infant Nutrition Products Liability Litigation

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois denied Mead Johnson's motion to exclude the testimony of a plaintiff's expert witness in the MDL concerning preterm infant nutrition products. This ruling is part of the ongoing multidistrict litigation regarding alleged links between infant formula and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC).

In re The Boeing Company Aircraft Securities Litigation - Opinion and Order

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois issued an opinion and order in the Boeing Aircraft Securities Litigation. The court granted in part a motion to compel, ordering Boeing to further amend its privilege log and produce certain categories of documents improperly withheld in this securities fraud case.

People v. Silva - Criminal Possession and Assault Conviction Affirmed

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York affirmed a conviction for criminal possession of a weapon and assault. The court found the evidence legally sufficient and the verdict not against the weight of the evidence. The defendant was sentenced to 7.5 years.

Rego Park Lender LLC v. Golyan - Appellate Division Decision

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York affirmed a lower court's judgment in favor of Rego Park Lender LLC, awarding the plaintiff $6,617,633.69. The decision addresses a guaranty and underlying debt stemming from a commercial mortgage default.

Kapitus Servicing Inc. v Suburban Waste Servs Inc - Court Opinion

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York affirmed the denial of summary judgment motions in Kapitus Servicing, Inc. v. Suburban Waste Servs., Inc. The court found issues of fact regarding whether certain agreements constitute loans or a sale of receivables, differing from the lower court's reasoning.

DeWolf v McDonald - Administrative Law Case

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York decided the case of DeWolf v McDonald on February 26, 2026. The case involves an emergency medical technician (EMT) challenging the revocation of his certification and a $26,000 fine after charges of endangering patient lives. The court reviewed multiple appeals related to the dismissal of the EMT's petition and the final determination by the Commissioner of Health.

Board of Managers of 45 E. 22nd St. Condominium v. 45 E. 22nd St. Prop. LLC

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York affirmed a lower court's order regarding a dispute over condominium sales proceeds. The court denied motions to dismiss claims of fraudulent inducement and fraudulent conveyance against certain defendants.

City of Roswell v. Lucero - Driving with Suspended License Appeal

The New Mexico Court of Appeals issued an opinion in City of Roswell v. Lucero, addressing an appeal of a conviction for driving with a suspended license. The court considered arguments regarding sufficiency of evidence and the authority of the Motor Vehicle Division to suspend the license.

State v. Crawford - New Mexico Court of Appeals Opinion

The New Mexico Court of Appeals issued an opinion in State v. Crawford, vacating one conviction for shooting from a motor vehicle due to double jeopardy. The court affirmed convictions for attempted murder, aggravated assault on a peace officer, and aggravated fleeing a law enforcement officer.

Dilley v. New Mexico Corr. Dep't - Civil Rights Act Appeal

The New Mexico Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's dismissal of a civil rights complaint. The plaintiff alleged failures in ensuring restitution orders were entered before a defendant's release. The court's decision is based on a prior Supreme Court ruling.

State v. Owen - Probation Revocation Appeal

The New Mexico Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision to revoke probation for Celestino J. Owen. The court found no possibility for reversal based on the defendant's arguments regarding insufficient evidence for aggravated driving while intoxicated and lack of notice of probation terms.

Mottola v. Triad Nat'l Sec., LLC - Employment Dispute

The New Mexico Court of Appeals issued a memorandum opinion in Mottola v. Triad Nat'l Sec., LLC, affirming a lower court's decision to uphold an arbitration award. The case involved an employment dispute concerning termination allegedly due to age or retaliation for union activities.

State of New Jersey v. A.U.B. - Criminal Coercion Plea Withdrawal

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed the denial of a motion to vacate a guilty plea for criminal coercion. The defendant's appeal argued the trial court erred in applying the Slater factors for withdrawing a guilty plea.

AA Glass Industries, LLC v. Seaside Ocean Terrace, LLC - Contract Dispute

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed a lower court's decision in a contractor dispute between AA Glass Industries, LLC and Solar Innovations, Inc. The court upheld the award of $40,235.18 plus finance charges and counsel fees to Solar Innovations, Inc.

Dorothy Guo v. Zoning Board of Adjustment - Land Use Appeal

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed a lower court's decision in favor of the Zoning Board of Adjustment and the Hegde defendants. The case involved an appeal concerning a development application with variances for a single-family home in Millburn Township.

Keith Loftus v. Teresa Loftus - Family Law Appeal

The New Jersey Superior Court affirmed a Family Part order enforcing a $14,200 court-imposed sanction against the defendant, Teresa Loftus. The sanction temporarily reduces the plaintiff's permanent alimony obligation until paid.

Marc Celler v. 1017 Park Avenue, LLC - Court Opinion

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division issued an opinion in Marc Celler v. 1017 Park Avenue, LLC. The court affirmed the denial of summary judgment and reconsideration motions but vacated a no cause verdict and remanded for a new trial on claims of breach of contract and violations of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act related to rent overcharges.

Moore v. Primadonna Co., LLC - Premises Liability Appeal

The Nevada Court of Appeals reviewed a personal injury case, Moore v. Primadonna Co., LLC. The court reversed in part and affirmed in part a district court's summary judgment order, remanding the case for further proceedings based on the application of the mode-of-operation approach to premises liability.

Bernstein v. Morris - Legal Malpractice Standing

The Nevada Court of Appeals reversed a district court's dismissal of a legal malpractice complaint. The court held that an intended third-party beneficiary to a trust may have standing to sue the settlor's attorney for negligence in preparing trust documents. The case was remanded for further proceedings.

Court of Appeals of Nevada - Guardianship of Minors Case

The Court of Appeals of Nevada vacated and remanded a district court order terminating a guardianship of minor children. The court held that guardians are entitled to notice and an opportunity to be heard before a guardianship can be sua sponte terminated.

Hall v. Warden - Criminal Case Opinion

The Court of Appeals of Nevada issued an opinion in Hall v. Warden (Docket No. 90152-COA) on December 23, 2025. The court addressed whether recent legislative changes to NRS Chapter 34 operate as a mandatory procedural bar for postconviction habeas corpus petitions challenging the computation of time served.

Joseph Austin v. State - Criminal Case Opinion

The Nevada Court of Appeals affirmed a conviction for home invasion, ruling that an attached garage constitutes a 'dwelling' under state law. The court clarified the definition of a dwelling for the purposes of the home invasion statute, impacting how property crimes are prosecuted in the state.

Missouri v. James Guthrie - Opinion Vacated and Remanded

The Missouri Court of Appeals vacated and remanded a conviction against James Guthrie. The court found insufficient evidence to support the conviction for statutory rape against Victim 2 on Count IV, specifically regarding the victim's age at the time of the offense. The case is remanded with instructions.

David J. Harris v. Missouri Secretary of State - Court Opinion

The Missouri Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision finding that David J. Harris lacked standing to challenge the Missouri Secretary of State's closure of an investigation into a complaint Harris filed. The court determined that taxpayers do not have a private right of action under Section 115.646.

City of Creve Coeur v. DirecTV - VSPA Fees Appeal

The Missouri Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's summary judgment in favor of DirecTV and other video service providers. The city of Creve Coeur had appealed the ruling regarding Video Service Provider Act (VSPA) fees. The appellate court denied a motion for amicus curiae briefs from Netflix and Hulu.

In Re R.K.N. - Minor Child Appeal Dismissed

The Missouri Court of Appeals dismissed an appeal in the case of In Re the Matter of R.K.N., a minor child. The dismissal was due to the appellant's failure to substantially comply with briefing requirements under Rule 84.04. The case involved modification of prior child custody and support orders.

Jacquille Graves v. State of Mississippi - Criminal Appeal

The Court of Appeals of Mississippi affirmed the conviction of Jacquille Graves for first-degree murder. The appeal centered on whether the trial court erred by failing to conduct a competency hearing. The court found no error in the trial court's proceedings.

Demarcus Wooten v. State of Mississippi - Criminal Appeal

The Court of Appeals of Mississippi affirmed the conviction of Demarcus Wooten for manslaughter. The court found no error in the circuit court's evidentiary decisions or jury instructions. The Tate County is taxed with the costs of the appeal.

Darren Clark v. State of Mississippi - Criminal Appeal

The Mississippi Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Darren Clark for armed robbery. The court ruled that the indictment was not legally defective for failing to name the specific store employee robbed, as it named the establishment and alleged the robbery occurred from its staff. Hinds County was taxed with the costs of the appeal.

James Carroll v. State of Mississippi - Criminal Appeal

The Court of Appeals of Mississippi affirmed the conviction of James Carroll for two counts of child exploitation. The court denied his motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial, upholding the consecutive forty-year sentences.

HHS OIG: Colorado Medicaid Improper Payments for ABA Services

The HHS Office of Inspector General (OIG) found that Colorado made at least $77.8 million in improper fee-for-service Medicaid payments for Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) services provided to children in 2022 and 2023. The OIG recommended Colorado refund $42.6 million to the Federal Government and improve guidance for ABA providers.

People of Michigan v. Robbie Deshawn Taylor - Affirmation of Lower Court Judgment

The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's judgment in the case of People of Michigan v. Robbie Deshawn Taylor. The defendant was convicted of first-degree premeditated murder and two counts of assault with intent to commit murder following a second trial. This decision comes after the appellate court denied the defendant's initial application and was ordered by the Supreme Court to consider the appeal of the order denying his motion for relief from judgment.

Caleb Mitchell Brown v. Comstock Turf Inc - Opinion Vacated and Remanded

The Michigan Court of Appeals vacated a trial court judgment of $9,512,590.35 against Comstock Turf Inc. and remanded the case with an order to enter judgment in favor of the defendants. The court's decision means the original judgment is no longer valid.

Thomas King v McLaren Health Corporation - Case Vacated and Remanded

The Michigan Court of Appeals vacated and remanded the case of Thomas King v. McLaren Health Corporation. This action follows a Supreme Court order for reconsideration in light of a new precedent, potentially impacting the application of employment contract limitations periods.

People of Michigan v. Vertese Steven Woods - Criminal Appeal

The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's judgment and sentence for Vertese Steven Woods, who was convicted of multiple felonies including involuntary manslaughter and fleeing and eluding. The court found the sentence, which included an upward departure from guidelines, to be proportionate.

Commonwealth v. Owen R. Broadhurst - Non-Precedential Opinion

The Massachusetts Appeals Court issued a non-precedential opinion in Commonwealth v. Owen R. Broadhurst. The case involves an appeal of 2018 convictions for OUI and negligent operation, with subsequent actions related to a prior OUI case affected by Commonwealth v. Hallinan.

Commonwealth v. Shannon Bennett - Criminal Threat Case

The Massachusetts Appeals Court issued an opinion in Commonwealth v. Shannon Bennett, concerning a conviction for threatening to commit a crime. The court acknowledged an instructional error regarding First Amendment rights, requiring a vacatur of the conviction.

Sullivan v. Flanagan - Opinion Affirming Protective Order

The Kentucky Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision to grant an Interpersonal Protective Order (IPO) against Dawn Sullivan based on stalking allegations. The opinion was issued on February 27, 2026, under docket number 2025-CA-1247.

State v. Wilkins - Idaho Court of Appeals Opinion

The Idaho Court of Appeals vacated a judgment of conviction for unlawful possession of a firearm against Robert Emanuel Wilkins, Jr. The court found that the impoundment and inventory search of the vehicle, which led to the discovery of the firearm, were unlawful.

Dimanione Lovelace v. State of Indiana - Criminal Appeal

The Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Dimanione Lovelace for felony murder and conspiracy to commit robbery. The court found no error in the trial court's decisions regarding venue, sufficiency of evidence for a firearm enhancement, sentencing discretion, or the appropriateness of the sentence.

Ryan Matthew Gluys v. State of Indiana - Criminal Appeal

The Indiana Court of Appeals reversed and remanded Ryan Matthew Gluys's conviction for invasion of privacy. The court found that while Gluys was properly removed from a pretrial diversion program, his conviction was based on the wrong statutory interpretation of harassment under a protective order.

Rodregus Morgan v. State of Indiana - Criminal Appeal

The Indiana Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the conviction of Rodregus Morgan for murder. The court found that the trial court erred in limiting the testimony presented regarding prior threats and abuse, which may have impacted the jury's verdict. The case will be reconsidered.

Stokes v. State of Indiana - Criminal Appeal

The Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Isaiah Jerone Stokes in docket number 25A-CR-00531. The court's disposition indicates no changes to the lower court's ruling.

Krista B Gue v. Triple E Property Management, LLC - Legal Opinion

The Indiana Court of Appeals issued a legal opinion in Krista B. Gue v. Triple E Property Management, LLC. The court affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded the case concerning vicarious liability for an employee's actions and claims of negligent hiring, retention, and supervision.

State v. Deangelo - Intermediate Court of Appeals Opinion

The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals issued a memorandum opinion in State v. Deangelo, concerning a conviction for Murder in the Second Degree and Arson in the First Degree. The court vacated the conviction and remanded the case.

State v. Kauhola - Appeal Dismissal

The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals has approved a stipulation to dismiss the appeal in State v. Kauhola. The dismissal is with prejudice, as per the parties' agreement and compliance with Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Narvaez v. Rojas - Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals Opinion

The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals issued an opinion in Narvaez v. Rojas, addressing an award of attorney's fees. The court affirmed the district court's judgment regarding attorney's fees, totaling $26,570.19, after a prior order was vacated.

Walley Isle Motors v. La Costa - Appeal of Service Dispute

The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals vacated a lower court's judgment in a dispute between Walley Isle Motors and P. Denise La Costa. The court remanded the case for entry of an amended judgment, indicating a modification of the original ruling.

Quinton Earl Settles v. State of Arkansas - Criminal Appeal

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Quinton Earl Settles for first-degree domestic battery. The court also addressed his appeal concerning charges of witness tampering and violation of a no-contact order, ultimately affirming his conviction.

Ronnie Tucker v. State of Arkansas - Drug Court Termination Appeal

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed the termination of Ronnie Tucker's participation in the Saline County Drug Court program. Tucker appealed the decision, arguing improper revocation and the judge's failure to recuse. The court found no error in the termination.

Weatherly v. Arkansas Dept. Human Services - Parental Rights Termination

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed the termination of parental rights for Christopher and Destiny Weatherly. The court granted the motions to withdraw filed by the parents' counsel, finding no issues of arguable merit on appeal.

Christopher Cole v. State of Arkansas - Probation Revocation Appeal

The Arkansas Court of Appeals reviewed a probation revocation case involving Christopher Cole. The court affirmed in part and reversed and dismissed in part the lower court's decision to revoke Cole's probation and sentence him to three years imprisonment.

Dylan Hise v. Arkansas Dept. Human Services - Termination of Parental Rights

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed the termination of Dylan Hise's parental rights to his minor child. The court found sufficient statutory grounds and that termination was in the child's best interest, upholding the lower court's decision.

In Re: Mh - Arizona Court of Appeals Non-Precedential Opinion

The Arizona Court of Appeals dismissed an appeal in the case In Re: Mh 2024-008892. The court found the appeal moot, meaning the issue was no longer a live controversy. This is a non-precedential opinion.

Arizona Court of Appeals - Parental Rights Termination

The Arizona Court of Appeals affirmed an order terminating parental rights for H.K. The decision, filed on February 25, 2026, addresses the father's appeal of the juvenile court's order. The case involved issues of drug use, non-compliance with court orders, and child support.

State v. Coker - Arizona Court of Appeals Opinion

The Arizona Court of Appeals vacated and remanded a lower court's order forfeiting a $10,000 appearance bond for Kristi Ann Coker. The court found that Coker's attorney in the criminal case did not represent her in the civil bond forfeiture matter, and she did not attend the hearing.

Total Renal v. Hon Moskowitz/Brackman - Special Action Review

The Arizona Court of Appeals accepted special action jurisdiction and granted relief in the case of Total Renal Care, Inc. v. Hon Moskowitz/Brackman. The court reconsidered a prior decision regarding the duty owed by medical providers to non-patient third parties when their patients cause harm after leaving the facility.

Arizona Court of Appeals Parental Rights Decision

The Arizona Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision to terminate parental rights due to chronic substance abuse. The father appealed, alleging due process violations related to a suppressed police report and a missed adjudication hearing, but the court found no merit in his claims.

Milton W. Taylor v. Director, Douglas Bellile - Appeal Opinion

The Wisconsin Courts have released an opinion for case 2024AP000709, Milton W. Taylor v. Director, Douglas Bellile. The opinion is dated February 27, 2026, and is available in PDF format.

State v. Jonathan Glen Berbaum - Criminal Appeal

The Wisconsin Courts have released an opinion in the criminal appeal case of State v. Jonathan Glen Berbaum, with case number 2025AP001380-CR. The opinion was released on February 25, 2026.

State v. L. J. H. - Criminal Appeal

The Wisconsin Court of Appeals has released an opinion in the criminal case State v. L. J. H. (Case number 2025AP002511-CR). The opinion is available in PDF format and is subject to further editing before appearing in official bound volumes.

Grant County Department of Social Services v. D. G. N. - Family Law

The Wisconsin Court of Appeals has released an opinion in the case of Grant County Department of Social Services v. D. G. N. The case number is 2025AP002382. The opinion was released on February 27, 2026.

Brittany Bay Club Condominium Owners Association, Inc. v. James R. Traugott

The Wisconsin Court of Appeals released an opinion in the case of Brittany Bay Club Condominium Owners Association, Inc. v. James R. Traugott. The opinion, identified by docket number 2025AP000100, was released on February 27, 2026. This release makes the court's decision publicly available.

Gracious Dining LLC v. Lopez - Workers' Compensation Appeal

The Intermediate Court of Appeals of West Virginia affirmed a decision by the Workers' Compensation Board of Review. The court found no substantial question of law or prejudicial error in the Board's reversal of a claim administrator's order that had rejected Miriam Lopez's workers' compensation claim against Gracious Dining LLC.

Cynthia Griffith v. Alpha Natural Resources, Inc. - Fatal Dependent Benefits

The Intermediate Court of Appeals of West Virginia affirmed a prior order rejecting a claim for fatal dependent benefits filed by Cynthia Griffith, dependent spouse of deceased worker James Griffith. The court found no substantial question of law or prejudicial error in the Workers' Compensation Board of Review's decision.

City of Wheeling v. Cody Melsop - Workers' Compensation Appeal

The Intermediate Court of Appeals of West Virginia affirmed a decision reversing the denial of a firefighter's claim for a right knee medial meniscal tear and temporary total disability benefits. The court found no substantial question of law or prejudicial error in the Workers' Compensation Board of Review's order.

WV DMV v. Perez - Chemical Test Refusal Appeal Dismissal

The West Virginia Intermediate Court of Appeals dismissed the DMV's appeal of a lower court's decision to dismiss the DMV's appeal of a magistrate court's ruling on a chemical test refusal. The court found the DMV lacked statutory authority to appeal such matters.

Airgas v. Lowe - Workers' Compensation Appeal

The West Virginia Intermediate Court of Appeals affirmed a Workers' Compensation Board of Review order that reversed a claim administrator's denial of benefits for Joshua Lowe. Airgas Mid America, the employer, appealed the decision. The court found no substantial question of law or prejudicial error.

Great-Grandmother's Parental Rights Termination Appeal Affirmed

The Tennessee Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's decision denying a great-grandmother's petition to terminate a mother's parental rights. The appellate court found that while grounds for termination existed, it was not in the child's best interest.

Emerson v. Emerson - Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Filing

The Tennessee Court of Appeals dismissed an interlocutory appeal in the case of Emerson v. Emerson due to the appellant's untimely filing. The appeal sought to challenge a trial court's order denying a motion for recusal. The court found it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction because the appeal was filed after the deadline stipulated by Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 10B.

Capps v. OneCare Dental Solutions LLC - Fiduciary Duty Breach

The Tennessee Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's judgment against Deborah McGilton for breaching her fiduciary duty as a member of OneCare Dental Solutions LLC. McGilton unilaterally sold company assets for $70,000 while securing personal employment, despite previous valuations suggesting a much higher worth. The court found the trial court properly adopted the Special Master's findings.

Urquia v. Neal - Dissenting Opinion on UM Statute Application

A dissenting opinion in the Urquia v. Neal case argues against the trial court's interpretation of Tennessee's uninsured motorist (UM) statute. The dissent contends that the statute's plain language, specifically section (d), should have been applied based on the process server's notation of 'NOT TO BE FOUND AFTER DILIGENT SEARCH AND INQUIRY,' rather than requiring further action or reissuance of summons.

Court of Appeals Dismisses Recusal Motion Appeal

The Tennessee Court of Appeals dismissed an appeal concerning a motion to recuse a trial judge in the case of Isaiah M. The court found that issues related to the recusal denial could be raised in the appeal of the final judgment, rendering the immediate appeal unnecessary.

Sean William Lee v. State of Tennessee - Post-Conviction Relief Appeal

The Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the dismissal of Sean William Lee's petition for post-conviction relief. Lee argued his guilty plea was involuntary due to misinformation about supervision, but the court found the issue was not properly raised in the lower court.

State v. Albert Dejuan White - Concurring Opinion on Miranda Rights

A concurring opinion in State v. Albert Dejuan White argues that law enforcement violated the defendant's Miranda rights during questioning. The opinion contends that specific actions by officers constituted interrogation without proper warnings, potentially impacting the admissibility of statements.

Albert Dejuan White appeal drug and firearm convictions

The Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the drug and firearm convictions of Albert Dejuan White. White appealed, arguing the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence and statements obtained during a search of his residence, and that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions. The appellate court found no reversible error.

Jerome Barrett appeal denied, post-conviction petition reopened

The Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals denied Jerome Barrett's application for permission to appeal the denial of his post-conviction petition. The court found that while Barrett cited a new Supreme Court ruling on the Confrontation Clause, his claims were previously determined or not factually supported.

State v. Mario Reed - Evading Arrest and Tampering Convictions Appeal

The Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals reviewed the convictions of Mario Reed for evading arrest, attempted tampering with evidence, and reckless endangerment. The court affirmed the trial court's judgments on most counts but remanded for sentencing on the reckless endangerment conviction.

State v. Pineda-Paz - Attempted Murder Conviction Affirmed

The Nebraska Court of Appeals affirmed the attempted murder conviction of Hermes J. Pineda-Paz. The court found no error in the district court's sentencing or in the effectiveness of Pineda-Paz's trial counsel. The decision upholds the original conviction and sentence.

State v. Lockman - Fentanyl Possession Conviction Affirmed

The Nebraska Court of Appeals affirmed Stephen J. Lockman's convictions for drug possession with intent to distribute and tampering with evidence. Lockman appealed his convictions, arguing issues with impeachment evidence, insufficient evidence, and ineffective assistance of counsel.

Skyline Ranches v. Omaha - Court Opinion

The Nebraska Supreme Court has issued an opinion in the case of Skyline Ranches v. Omaha. This document represents the court's final decision on the matter, providing a ruling on the legal issues presented.

State v. Starkey - Possession Conviction Appeal Affirmed

The Nebraska Court of Appeals affirmed the possession conviction of Natasha L. Starkey. The court ruled against Starkey's assertions that the district court erred in admitting evidence or denying her motion to suppress physical evidence obtained during a search at the Nebraska State Penitentiary.

State v. Morales - Sentencing Appeal

The Nebraska Court of Appeals reviewed sentencing in State v. Morales. The court affirmed sentences for two convictions but vacated and remanded one sentence due to plain error in sentencing procedure. The case involves charges of operating a motor vehicle to avoid arrest, and possession of methamphetamine and cocaine.

State of Minnesota v. Shane Joseph Gross - Criminal Appeal

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Shane Joseph Gross on charges including drive-by shooting and assault. The court found no abuse of discretion in admitting evidence of jail calls and determined that a single remark during closing arguments did not affect the verdict.

State v. Mason - Criminal Sentencing Appeal

The Minnesota Court of Appeals reversed and remanded a district court's sentencing decision for Paul Lewis Mason. The appellate court found the district court abused its discretion by imposing a downward durational departure in sentencing for felony threats of violence. The case is remanded for resentencing.

Krystal Drift v. Sean Swapinski - Harassment Restraining Order Affirmed

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed a harassment restraining order (HRO) against Sean Swapinski, finding the district court did not err in admitting evidence or in its factual findings. The HRO prohibits Swapinski from contacting Krystal Drift or coming within 25 feet of her home for two years.

Cup Foods v. City of Minneapolis - Property Taking Claim

The Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of a petition for a writ of mandamus filed by Cup Foods, Inc. and other business owners against the City of Minneapolis. The businesses alleged that the city's actions following George Floyd's death constituted an unconstitutional taking of their property. The court found no unconstitutional taking occurred.

State v. Thompson - Criminal Competency Appeal

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's order finding Nicholas Scott Thompson competent to proceed with criminal proceedings. The court found no error in declining to consider the appellant's request to discharge his counsel and that counsel's performance was objectively reasonable.

Arreola v. State of Iowa - Postconviction Relief Application Dismissal

The Iowa Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of Jan De Jesus Coronel Arreola's application for postconviction relief and petition for writ of habeas corpus. The court found no error in the district court's decision.

Dormire v. State of Iowa - Sexual Abuse Conviction Affirmed

The Iowa Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's denial of postconviction relief for Caleb Dormire, who was convicted of sexual abuse in the second degree. The court found no merit in Dormire's arguments regarding ineffective trial counsel and newly discovered evidence.

Barnhardt v. State of Iowa - Appeal of Postconviction Relief Denial

The Iowa Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of Ryan Barnhardt's application for postconviction relief concerning his convictions for sexual abuse. Barnhardt alleged ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, but the court found no breach of duty.

Washington v. State of Iowa - Postconviction Relief Appeal

The Iowa Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of Bobby Ray Washington's application for postconviction relief. The court found that Washington's ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim was not preserved and that he failed to prove actual innocence.

Auto Owners Insurance v. Labor Commission - Workers' Comp Recovery Dispute

The Utah Supreme Court ruled on a dispute between an injured employee and their employer/insurer regarding the sharing of a third-party recovery. The court affirmed the Labor Commission's interpretation that the employer and insurer must share in the expenses of obtaining the recovery proportionally to their total interest, including future offsets, and must reimburse the employee for their share of expenses before offsetting future benefits.

In re B.G. - Utah Supreme Court Opinion

The Utah Supreme Court issued an opinion in the case of In re B.G., addressing the process for out-of-state parental fitness evaluations when a child is removed from a custodial parent. The court considered whether the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children (ICPC) was appropriately applied and whether counsel was ineffective for not objecting to its use.

State v. Jennings - Utah Supreme Court Opinion

The Utah Supreme Court issued an opinion in State v. Jennings, addressing the standard required for a defendant to establish a prima facie claim of justification under the Pretrial Justification Statute. The court clarified the evidentiary burden on defendants seeking to have a justification defense determined before trial.

State v. Blackwing - Utah Supreme Court Opinion

The Utah Supreme Court issued an opinion in State v. Blackwing, addressing the admissibility of evidence in a criminal case. The court held that evidence intrinsic to a charged crime is not subject to rule 404(b) regarding other acts evidence, reversing in part a lower court's decision.

Van Dusen v. Wasatch County - Utah Supreme Court Opinion

The Utah Supreme Court has issued an opinion in Van Dusen v. Wasatch County. The court granted a motion to suspend an injunction that had halted construction of a temple, allowing construction to resume pending the resolution of the appeal. The decision addresses the risk of irreparable harm in the context of appellate injunctions.

Kildow v. Texas - Habeas Corpus Application Granted

The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals granted Lonard Kildow's habeas corpus application, allowing him an out-of-time appeal for a conviction of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. The court ordered the trial court to determine indigency and appoint counsel if requested, with a notice of appeal due within thirty days of the court's mandate.

Martinez v. State - Habeas Corpus Relief Granted

The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals granted habeas corpus relief to Ramiro Martinez, reforming his sentence for capital murder. The court found that his juvenile status at the time of the offense, coupled with the Eighth Amendment, necessitated a sentence modification.

Gallamore George Stanley - Out of Time Appeal Granted

The Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas granted an out-of-time appeal for George Stanley Gallamore in case WR-97,273-01. The court found that Gallamore was denied his right to an appeal due to a breakdown in the system, specifically counsel's failure to timely file a notice of appeal.

Seeger Justin Uriah - Habeas Corpus Out of Time PDR Granted

The Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas granted an out-of-time petition for discretionary review for Justin Uriah Seeger. This decision stems from a finding that his appellate counsel's performance was deficient in failing to timely inform him of his conviction affirmation and his right to file a pro se petition.

Kendrick v. Texas - Out of Time Appeal Granted

The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals granted Eric Robert Kendrick an out-of-time appeal. The court found that counsel failed to timely file a notice of appeal, thus denying Kendrick his right to an appeal. He may now file an out-of-time appeal for his conviction.

Morrison v. Morrison - Divorce Decree Enforcement Case

The Texas Supreme Court reversed an appeals court decision in Morrison v. Morrison, remanding a divorce decree enforcement case to the trial court. The court found that while the trial court had jurisdiction to enforce the decree, it erred in reallocating property proceeds without evidence of damages.

Gardens of Connemara Ltd. v. Longhorn Creek Ltd. - Texas Supreme Court Opinion

The Texas Supreme Court issued an opinion in Gardens of Connemara Ltd. v. Longhorn Creek Ltd. The case concerns the application of Rule 91a to dismiss a claim involving a private transfer fee on real property. The court denied a petition for review, leaving lower court decisions in place.

In the Estate of J. Hugh Wheatfall - Probate Case

The Texas Supreme Court reversed a court of appeals judgment in a probate case concerning the estate of J. Hugh Wheatfall. The Court remanded the case to the appeals court for further consideration of the merits, finding that a prior order was not a final, appealable judgment.

Privilege Underwriters Reciprocal Exchange v. Mankoff - Insurance Windstorm Interpretation

The Texas Supreme Court reversed a lower court's decision in Privilege Underwriters Reciprocal Exchange v. Mankoff, ruling that a tornado damage claim is subject to the policy's "Windstorm or Hail Deductible." The court reinstated the trial court's judgment favoring the insurer.

Umphress v. Steel - Texas Supreme Court Certified Question

The Texas Supreme Court denied a motion for rehearing in Umphress v. Steel, clarifying its previous ruling on a certified question from the Fifth Circuit. The court reiterated its 'no' answer regarding whether judges can refuse to perform same-sex weddings for religious reasons while still performing opposite-sex weddings.

Cespedes v. Meta Platforms, Inc. - Product Liability Complaint

A product liability complaint was filed by Kelly P. Cespedes against Meta Platforms, Inc. and other defendants in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The filing fee for the complaint was $405.

Zhan v. US Dept of State - Other Immigration Actions

A complaint was filed on March 2, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, case number 5:26-cv-01757. The case, Zhan v. United States Department of State et al, is classified as Other Immigration Actions and involves a U.S. Government Defendant.

In the Matter of Tasha Jean Kotz - Attorney Discipline

The Supreme Court of South Carolina has suspended attorney Tasha Jean Kotz for six months following an Agreement for Discipline by Consent. The suspension stems from multiple disciplinary complaints alleging practice-related misconduct, including misrepresenting COVID-19 test results and disclosing client confidences online.

City of Charleston v. City of North Charleston - Writ of Certiorari Dismissed

The Supreme Court of South Carolina has dismissed the writ of certiorari in the case of City of Charleston v. City of North Charleston. The court determined that the writ was improvidently granted, effectively ending the appellate review of the lower court's decision.

Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League v. SCDES - Natural Gas Pipeline Certification

The Supreme Court of South Carolina affirmed an administrative law court's order granting water quality certification for Dominion Energy's natural gas pipeline project. The Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League had appealed the certification, which is necessary for the company to obtain a federal permit to construct the pipeline.

State v. Kierin M. Dennis - Immunity Hearing Decision

The Supreme Court of South Carolina reversed a lower court's decision, ruling that a criminal defendant is not entitled to a second immunity hearing under the Protection of Persons and Property Act following a mistrial. The case is remanded for consideration of other appellate issues.

South Carolina Supreme Court Publicly Reprimands Mark Justin Josephs

The South Carolina Supreme Court has publicly reprimanded attorney Mark Justin Josephs for misconduct including billing discrepancies and failure to maintain financial records. The reprimand stems from an agreement where Josephs admitted to violations of professional conduct rules.

Apostolico v. Pagliaro - Property Tax Dispute

The Supreme Court of Rhode Island affirmed a lower court's amended final judgment regarding property tax responsibility. The court held that the defendant was responsible for her share of property taxes, aligning with precedent from Koszela v. Wilcox.

Destiny Viera v. State of Rhode Island - Criminal Case

The Supreme Court of Rhode Island quashed orders removing an attorney in two criminal cases, finding the removal for a potential conflict of interest was not warranted at the time. The court's decision impacts the right to counsel and attorney selection in criminal proceedings.

State v. Brian Smith - Supreme Court of Rhode Island Opinion

The Supreme Court of Rhode Island affirmed a lower court's order denying a defendant's request for declaratory and injunctive relief in an ongoing criminal proceeding. The defendant had pleaded nolo contendere to child molestation charges.

Bank of America v. Neronha - Trustee Case

The Rhode Island Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's decision designating Miriam Hospital as the alternative beneficiary of several trusts, upholding the selection of a new beneficiary after the original beneficiary, Memorial Hospital, closed. The court found no error in the trial justice's consideration of changed circumstances in healthcare provision.

In the Matter of Raymond T. Trebisacci - Disbarment Order

The Supreme Court of Rhode Island has issued an order disbarring attorney Raymond T. Trebisacci on consent. The order also appoints Special Masters to manage his client files and accounts, ensuring client interests are protected. This action follows an investigation into professional misconduct.

DEP v. Grant Twp. - Environmental Law

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court affirmed an order from the Commonwealth Court in DEP v. Grant Twp. of Indiana Co. The case involves an appeal related to environmental regulations. The court's decision was unanimous and issued on February 18, 2026.

Commonwealth v. Torner, R. - Criminal Appeal

The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania granted a petition for allowance of appeal in Commonwealth v. Torner, R., vacating a Superior Court order. The case is remanded for reconsideration in light of a recent Supreme Court decision, Commonwealth v. Walker.

Commonwealth v. Wakeley - Criminal Appeal

The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania granted a petition for allowance of appeal in Commonwealth v. Wakeley, vacating a Superior Court order. The case is remanded for reconsideration in light of a recent Supreme Court precedent.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Opinion on Condemnation Case

The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania issued an opinion in a condemnation case involving the City of Philadelphia. The court affirmed an order quashing an appeal, clarifying what constitutes a final, appealable order under the Eminent Domain Code regarding preliminary determinations versus final confirmation of a viewers' report.

Commonwealth v. Smith - Pennsylvania Supreme Court Opinion

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court reversed an order dismissing a PCRA petition in Commonwealth v. Smith. The court found that the PCRA court improperly dismissed the appellant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel regarding evidence introduced during a resentencing hearing. The case is remanded for a new penalty-phase hearing.

Oklahoma Lawyer License Suspension - State of Oklahoma ex rel. OBA v. Lile

The Supreme Court of Oklahoma has dismissed a reciprocal disciplinary proceeding against attorney Jason Martin Lile. Although the Muscogee (Creek) Nation Supreme Court had suspended his license for one year, the Oklahoma Supreme Court found no further discipline was warranted after de novo review.

Oklahoma Supreme Court Issues Writ of Prohibition in Drilling Dispute

The Oklahoma Supreme Court issued a writ of prohibition barring enforcement of a lower court's judgment and a writ of mandamus ordering dismissal of claims in a drilling dispute. The case involves an employee's injury and subsequent lawsuit against his employer, Cactus Drilling Company, LLC.

Oklahoma Supreme Court Amends Judicial Continuing Legal Education Rules

The Supreme Court of Oklahoma has amended Rule 2 of the Rules for Mandatory Judicial Continuing Legal Education. The amendment clarifies the types of courses and programs that can be used to satisfy the MJCLE requirement, including a limit on general MCLE hours.

Oklahoma Bar Association v. Kline - Interim Suspension

The Supreme Court of Oklahoma has issued an order for the emergency interim suspension of attorney Jesse David Kline. The suspension follows the filing of a complaint by the Oklahoma Bar Association alleging multiple felony charges related to exploitation and embezzlement.

Howard v. Barrington Homeowners - HOA Dues Dispute

The Oklahoma Supreme Court issued an opinion in Howard v. Barrington Homeowners, vacating a lower court's decision and affirming the district court's grant of summary judgment. The case involved allegations of improper use of homeowners' association dues and other mismanagement.

Peace v. Galloway - Ohio Supreme Court Habeas Corpus Ruling

The Ohio Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's decision to dismiss a habeas corpus petition filed by an inmate. The court found that the inmate had an adequate remedy through direct appeal to challenge the assignment of the judge who accepted his guilty pleas and sentenced him.

Ohio Supreme Court attorney misconduct suspension stayed

The Ohio Supreme Court has conditionally stayed a six-month suspension for attorney Eric Dorman Hall following allegations of misconduct. This follows a prior suspension and reinstatement with probation for similar violations.

State ex rel. Patterson v. Starn - Ohio Supreme Court Opinion

The Ohio Supreme Court affirmed the dismissal of a writ of mandamus filed by appellant Patterson against Judge Starn. The court found that Patterson had an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law and that his claim was barred by res judicata. The opinion was issued on February 26, 2026.

Ohio Supreme Court Dismisses Public Records Request Case

The Ohio Supreme Court modified a lower court's judgment in State ex rel. Mason v. Basinger, denying a writ of mandamus and statutory damages. The court found that the relator failed to demonstrate a clear legal duty for the named respondent, a mail-room employee, to provide the requested public records.

Ohio Supreme Court Opinion on Attorney-Client Privilege

The Ohio Supreme Court reversed a lower court's decision compelling an insurance company to produce claims files, finding that such orders must comply with specific statutes regarding attorney-client privilege and work-product doctrine. The case, Eddy v. Farmers Property Cas. Ins. Co., remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with the ruling.

State v. Calderon - NC Supreme Court Upholds Convictions

The North Carolina Supreme Court has upheld convictions in the case of State v. Calderon, rejecting an appeals court ruling that had reversed one of the convictions. The case involves charges of taking indecent liberties with a child. The Supreme Court's decision clarifies the application of the law in this specific instance.

NC Supreme Court Reverses Joint Employment Ruling in Lassiter Case

The North Carolina Supreme Court reversed a lower court's ruling in Lassiter v. Robeson Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't, clarifying the state's joint employment doctrine. The court held that the plaintiff did not meet the control requirement for joint employment, reversing the finding that Truesdell Corporation was a joint employer.

State v. Allison - Castle Doctrine Defense Review

The North Carolina Supreme Court is reviewing a case concerning the castle doctrine defense in a second-degree murder conviction. The court will determine if the trial court's jury instructions on this defense constituted plain error, as the defendant claims he shot the victim while the victim was in the doorway of his residence.

State v. Kelliher - NC Supreme Court Resentencing Authority Opinion

The North Carolina Supreme Court issued an opinion in State v. Kelliher, addressing resentencing authority. The court reversed a lower court's decision, clarifying the scope of a sentencing court's mandate following a prior appeal. This ruling impacts how resentencing orders are interpreted and executed in North Carolina.

State v. Bracey - Possession of Stolen Firearm

The Supreme Court of North Carolina affirmed a lower court's decision in State v. Bracey, finding sufficient evidence that the defendant knew or should have known the firearm in his possession was stolen. The ruling upholds the conviction for possession of a stolen firearm.

People v. Anderson - Criminal Law

The New York Court of Appeals affirmed a conviction for second-degree murder in People v. Anderson. The court held that the Appellate Division applied the correct legal standard when reviewing the weight of the evidence in a case relying solely on circumstantial proof.

Rutgers University v. AFSCME Local 888 - Title IX Preemption

The Supreme Court of New Jersey ruled that the grievance procedure in a collective negotiation agreement between Rutgers University and AFSCME Local 888 is preempted by federal Title IX Regulations. The Court found that the agreement's arbitration process excluded the alleged victim, violating the requirement that grievance procedures apply equally to both parties.

State v. Jamel Carlton - Persistent Offender Sentencing

The Supreme Court of New Jersey ruled in State v. Jamel Carlton that the error in sentencing a persistent offender without a jury finding, as per Erlinger v. United States, is subject to harmless error review. The Court found the error harmless in this specific case but called for legislative revision of the statute.

State v. Gerald W. Butler - New Jersey Supreme Court Opinion

The New Jersey Supreme Court reviewed defendant Gerald W. Butler's conviction for controlled dangerous substances offenses. The Court considered whether prosecutorial comments and the admission of evidence portraying Butler as a violent, organized criminal deprived him of a fair trial. The Court found that while individual errors did not warrant overturning the convictions, the cumulative effect of the errors was significant.

C.A.L. v. State of New Jersey - Civil Rights and Tort Claims

The Supreme Court of New Jersey considered whether the Heck v. Humphrey favorable-termination rule applies to claims under the New Jersey Civil Rights Act and Tort Claims Act. The Court reviewed a case where a plaintiff's parole was revoked and later reinstated, impacting the timeliness of her subsequent civil claims.

State v. Walter J. Gilliano - New Jersey Supreme Court Opinion

The New Jersey Supreme Court issued an opinion in State v. Walter J. Gilliano, addressing the impact of an executive order on jury selection. The court ruled that the existing jury pool would not be dismissed, finding the defendant did not establish a violation of his right to a jury drawn from a representative cross-section of the community.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire - Child Custody Jurisdiction

The Supreme Court of New Hampshire affirmed a lower court's decision retaining exclusive jurisdiction over a child custody matter. The court found that New Hampshire maintains jurisdiction despite the mother's relocation to Maine and her attempt to register a foreign order in Maine.

B.K. v. B.W. - Civil Stalking Order Appeal

The Supreme Court of New Hampshire reversed a civil stalking final order of protection in B.K. v. B.W. The court found insufficient evidence to support the stalking charge, reversing the lower court's decision. The opinion was issued on October 8, 2025.

Ball v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Manchester - Court Opinion

The Supreme Court of New Hampshire affirmed a lower court's decision to dismiss a lawsuit alleging negligent hiring, retention, and supervision. The court found that applying a 2020 amendment to revive the plaintiff's time-barred claim would be an unconstitutional retrospective application of the law.

New Hampshire Supreme Court Opinion on Guardianship of K.S.

The New Hampshire Supreme Court vacated a lower court's order appointing a guardian for K.S., ruling that the trial court lacked jurisdiction. The decision stems from an appeal concerning K.S.'s residency in Maine while guardianship proceedings were initiated in New Hampshire.

Pittsfield School District v. New Hampshire State Board of Education - Tuition Appeal

The Supreme Court of New Hampshire issued an opinion on October 17, 2025, in the appeal of the Pittsfield School District regarding tuition payments for a resident student attending an open enrollment school. The court affirmed the State Board of Education's ruling, requiring the district to pay tuition.

da Silva v. Sierra Club Foundation et al - Civil Rights: Jobs

A new civil case, da Silva v. Sierra Club Foundation et al, was filed on February 19, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case is based on diversity jurisdiction and concerns Civil Rights related to jobs. Recent filings include a certificate of service and an initial case management scheduling order.

Nevada Supreme Court Opinion on Media Access

The Nevada Supreme Court denied a petition for a writ of mandamus filed by Our Nevada Judges, Inc., a press organization. The petition challenged district court orders that denied certain media access requests. The court's decision upholds the existing district court orders regarding media access.

Nevada Supreme Court Opinion on Water Rights Forfeiture

The Nevada Supreme Court affirmed a State Engineer's decision to declare water rights forfeited for Egger Enterprises, LLC, due to non-beneficial use. The court found the State Engineer did not abuse his discretion in denying a second extension request.

City of Reno v. District Court (Conrad) - Civil Opinion

The Nevada Supreme Court granted a petition for a writ of mandamus, vacating an ex parte alternative writ previously issued by the district court. The ruling clarifies that district courts must address the inadequacy of regular inter partes procedure before issuing an ex parte writ of mandamus for public records requests.

Stuckey v. Apex Materials, LLC - Nevada Supreme Court Opinion

The Nevada Supreme Court issued an opinion in Stuckey v. Apex Materials, LLC, concerning a dispute over prevailing wages under NRS 338.020. The court affirmed a lower court's order granting a motion to dismiss a putative class action seeking the difference between wages paid and amounts allegedly due under the statute.

Education Department Proposed Priorities for Comprehensive Centers Program

The U.S. Department of Education has published proposed priorities, requirements, and definitions for the Comprehensive Centers Program. These proposed changes are open for public comment and aim to update the program's operational framework.

Mississippi Supreme Court Estate Case: Zoa Ann Manners v. Estate of Gary Wayne Johnson

The Mississippi Supreme Court reversed a Court of Appeals decision, reinstating a lower court's judgment regarding an estate dispute. The case, Zoa Ann Manners v. The Estate of Gary Wayne Johnson, involved a creditor's claim based on an "Article of Agreement" concerning real property distribution. The court's decision impacts how such agreements are interpreted in estate matters.

Palmer's Grocery Inc. v. Chandler's JKE, Inc. - Contract Dispute

The Mississippi Supreme Court reversed and remanded a Lee County Circuit Court decision in Palmer's Grocery Inc. v. Chandler's JKE, Inc. The case involves a dispute over an oral agreement for the sale of a grocery store. The appellees were taxed with the costs of the appeal.

National Health Insurance Company v. Daphne Lever - Insurance Venue Dispute

The Mississippi Supreme Court reversed a lower court's decision in National Health Insurance Company v. Daphne Lever, finding that venue was proper in Madison County, not Hinds County. The case involves a dispute over medical insurance coverage and the proper location for legal proceedings.

Dew v. Greenwood Leflore Consolidated School District - Property Title Dispute

The Mississippi Supreme Court reversed and remanded a lower court's decision in Dew v. Greenwood Leflore Consolidated School District, concerning the ownership of water rights on school trust lands. The court found that the school district incorrectly claimed title to waters within the public waters trust.

Mississippi Supreme Court Amends Mandatory Continuing Legal Education Rules

The Mississippi Supreme Court has granted an expedited petition to amend the Rules and Regulations for Mandatory Continuing Legal Education. The amendments, effective immediately, include a new $50.00 fee for sponsors seeking approval to hold CLE programs that charge Mississippi attorneys. The order was entered on September 23, 2025.

People of Michigan v. Michael Georgie Carson - Criminal Appeal

The Michigan Supreme Court issued an opinion in the case of People of Michigan v. Michael Georgie Carson, concerning the admissibility of evidence seized from a cell phone. The Court reversed Carson's convictions, finding that the search warrant for his phone was insufficiently particular and authorized a general search.

In Re Barber/Espinoza Minors - Parental Rights Termination

The Michigan Supreme Court issued a combined opinion in the case of In Re Barber/Espinoza Minors, concerning the termination of parental rights. The court affirmed the trial court's decision to terminate the respondent-mother's parental rights due to allegations of sexual abuse and her failure to protect the children.

People v. Robinson - Michigan Supreme Court Opinion

The Michigan Supreme Court issued an opinion in People v. Robinson, addressing whether a judge acting as a one-person grand jury under MCL 767.3 and MCL 767.4, without a preliminary examination, deprives the court of subject-matter jurisdiction. The Court considered the retroactive application of its decision in People v. Peeler.

GAO Report: DOE Nuclear Waste Cleanup Cost and Schedule Accuracy Needs Improvement

A GAO report released March 2, 2026, found that the Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Environmental Management (EM) needs to improve the accuracy and consistency of its cost and schedule estimates for nuclear waste cleanup projects. The report highlights significant cost increases and data management challenges, impacting over $500 billion in ongoing cleanup efforts.

Lamenski Ewing v. State of Indiana - Probation Revocation Appeal

The Indiana Supreme Court reversed a probation revocation for Lamenski Ewing. The court found that the petition to revoke work release did not adequately notify Ewing that his subsequent probation was also being sought for revocation. The case involves a Level 3 felony conviction and subsequent probation terms.

Ajaylan M Shabazz v. State of Indiana - Criminal Appeal

The Indiana Supreme Court ruled in Ajaylan M Shabazz v. State of Indiana that the trial court abused its discretion by allowing a witness to testify remotely without sufficient good cause. While the court affirmed the conviction due to harmless error, it established a stricter standard for remote testimony in criminal trials.

Indiana Land Trust 3082 v. Hammond Redevelopment Commission - Opinion

The Indiana Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's decision in Indiana Land Trust 3082 v. Hammond Redevelopment Commission. The court held that the Indiana Tort Claims Act provides immunity to government entities for initiating judicial proceedings, affirming the dismissal of an abuse-of-process claim against the Hammond Redevelopment Commission.

Michael Carr v. State of Indiana - Criminal Appeal

The Indiana Supreme Court affirmed the conviction and life-without-parole sentence of Michael Carr for murder. Carr was found guilty of killing a confidential informant who had previously helped convict him. The court found no constitutional violations, procedural errors, or inappropriate sentencing.

Indiana Supreme Court Opinion: Commitment of A D

The Indiana Supreme Court issued an opinion regarding the civil commitment of A.D. The court affirmed in part and vacated in part the lower court's decision, finding sufficient evidence for temporary commitment despite a misstatement of the standard of review.

State v. Salazar-Cabrera - Idaho Supreme Court Opinion

The Idaho Supreme Court affirmed a district court's decision regarding a misdemeanor vehicular manslaughter conviction. The appeal centered on the application of the law of the case doctrine concerning a jail sentence assurance made by a previous judge.

Bedell v. Parsons - Idaho Supreme Court Property Dispute

The Idaho Supreme Court reversed a district court's decision regarding property ownership interests in Bedell v. Parsons. The court found that the district court erred in its determination of ownership and partition of the property, remanding the case for further proceedings.

Hyde v. Oxarango - Idaho Supreme Court Opinion

The Idaho Supreme Court affirmed a district court's dismissal of a complaint filed by limited partners Gretchen Hyde and Dinah Reaney against Robert and Rochelle Oxarango. The case involved a dispute over a family farm and ranching business managed by a limited partnership.

City of Idaho Falls v. Idaho Department of Water Resources - Water Rights Dispute

The Idaho Supreme Court issued a substitute opinion in the case of City of Idaho Falls v. Idaho Department of Water Resources, withdrawing a prior opinion dated December 31, 2025. The appeal concerning water rights distribution was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Spears v. Antelope Mountain Resort, LLC - Idaho Supreme Court Opinion

The Idaho Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's decision in Spears v. Antelope Mountain Resort, LLC, ruling that a property owner may not be held civilly liable for the criminal acts of her grandson. The court found no duty to aid or protect the victim from the grandson's actions.

Vann Bragg v. State of Arkansas - Supreme Court Opinion

The Supreme Court of Arkansas affirmed a lower court's denial of a Rule 37 petition. The petition alleged ineffective assistance of trial counsel in the case of Vann Bragg, who was convicted of first-degree murder and battery. The court found no clear error in the lower court's decision.

State v. Roy Nichols, Jr. - Rape Shield Statute Scope

The Arkansas Supreme Court reversed a lower court's decision regarding the admissibility of evidence under the state's rape-shield statute in the case of State v. Roy Nichols, Jr. The court found that evidence of prior sexual conduct was not admissible in this instance, reversing the trial court's ruling.

Arkansas Access to Justice Commission Appointment

The Supreme Court of Arkansas has appointed Judge Thomas Potter to the Arkansas Access to Justice Commission for a three-year term. Deepali Lal and Kyle Burton were reappointed to the Board of Directors of the Arkansas Access to Justice Foundation, Inc. The court expressed gratitude to Judge Kim Bridgforth for her service.

Arkansas Access to Justice Commission Appointments

The Supreme Court of Arkansas has issued an opinion appointing Judge Thomas Potter to the Arkansas Access to Justice Commission for a three-year term. Additionally, Deepali Lal and Kyle Burton have been reappointed to the Board of Directors of the Arkansas Access to Justice Foundation, Inc. for three-year terms.

Bryan Norris v. Independence County - Election Dispute

The Supreme Court of Arkansas issued a dissenting opinion regarding the handling of an election dispute case involving Independence County. The dissent argues for expedited resolution of jurisdictional questions in election matters, citing federal court precedents for rapid decision-making.

State of Arizona v. Asalia Guadalupe Alvarez-Soto - Criminal Appeal

The Arizona Supreme Court issued an opinion in State of Arizona v. Asalia Guadalupe Alvarez-Soto, vacating and remanding the Court of Appeals' decision. The court addressed issues regarding the denial of a motion to suppress evidence found during a traffic stop and the appellate standard of review for video evidence.

Knight v. Fontes - Arizona Supreme Court Opinion

The Arizona Supreme Court issued an opinion in Knight v. Fontes, affirming the constitutionality of the retention election process for court of appeals judges as established by A.R.S. § 12-120.02. The court found no violation of the Free and Equal Elections Clause or the Equal Privileges and Immunities Clause of the Arizona Constitution.

State of Arizona v. hon.gordon/owen - Criminal Case Opinion

The Arizona Supreme Court issued an opinion in State of Arizona v. hon.gordon/owen, docket number CR-24-0064-PR, filed on December 12, 2025. The court reversed a lower court's decision regarding charges under an enhanced penalty statute for a traffic violation resulting in death.

State of Arizona v. Hon. marner/haniffa - Sentencing Enhancement Ruling

The Arizona Supreme Court ruled that a conviction for luring a minor for sexual exploitation can qualify for a Dangerous Crime Against Children sentencing enhancement, even if the "minor" victim is fictitious. The court reversed and remanded the case, vacating the Court of Appeals opinion.

Arizona Supreme Court Opinion in Re: MH2023-004502

The Arizona Supreme Court issued an opinion in the case In Re: MH2023-004502, vacating a prior Court of Appeals opinion. The case concerns the legal process for involuntary mental health treatment in Arizona, referencing specific statutes related to court-ordered evaluations and treatment petitions.

Howard v. D.C. Employment Services - Workers' Compensation Appeal

The D.C. Court of Appeals affirmed a Compensation Review Board decision granting temporary total disability benefits to an employee for an occupational disease. The court found the employee's carpal tunnel syndrome led to her resignation and upheld the board's findings.

Jennings & Turner v. US - Court Opinion

The District of Columbia Court of Appeals affirmed some convictions for appellant Derek Brian Turner related to violent incidents but reversed accessory after the fact convictions for appellant Ronnika M. Jennings due to insufficient evidence. Both appellants' obstruction of justice convictions were vacated.

Hewitt v. United States - Felony Murder Conviction Vacatur

The District of Columbia Court of Appeals ruled in Hewitt v. United States that trial courts must vacate the predicate felony conviction when a defendant is convicted of both first-degree felony murder and the underlying felony, to avoid violating the Double Jeopardy Clause. The court clarified that the trial court has no discretion to choose which conviction to vacate.

Grant v. United States - Court Opinion on Motion to Suppress

The District of Columbia Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's denial of a motion to suppress evidence in Grant v. United States. The court found that the police did not seize the appellant until after he discarded a satchel containing a gun, thus the evidence was not the fruit of an illegal seizure.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals - Disbarment of Paul Gerard Wersant

The District of Columbia Court of Appeals has disbarred Paul Gerard Wersant from the practice of law. This action follows the Supreme Court of Florida's permanent revocation of his license and his failure to respond to the court's order to show cause. His disbarment is effective pending his compliance with specific filing requirements.

Helms v. State - Second-Degree Murder Appeal

The Wyoming Supreme Court affirmed a conviction for second-degree murder in Helms v. State. The appellant claimed self-defense immunity and errors in jury instructions and evidence sufficiency. The court found no abuse of discretion and sufficient evidence for the conviction.

Joshua John O'Dell v. State of Wyoming - Criminal Appeal

The Wyoming Supreme Court affirmed a conviction for first-degree sexual assault of a minor. The defendant appealed, challenging rulings on cross-examination and evidence admissibility. The court found no abuse of discretion in the trial court's decisions.

Castaner v. State of Wyoming - Sentencing Appeal

The Wyoming Supreme Court affirmed a district court's sentence for a juvenile convicted of second-degree murder. The appellant argued the sentence violated constitutional prohibitions against cruel or unusual punishment, but the court found it was within statutory limits.

Allen v. Allen - Marital Property Division Appeal

The Wyoming Supreme Court affirmed a district court's decision in the divorce case of Allen v. Allen. The appellant husband appealed the division of marital property and an equalization payment of $850,000, but the court found no abuse of discretion.

Baier v. State of Wyoming - Restitution Award Appeal

The Wyoming Supreme Court affirmed a restitution award of $92,722.79 against Kylea Rae Baier. Baier appealed, arguing that certain credit card charges should be excluded from the award because the victim received a benefit. The court found no abuse of discretion in the district court's decision.

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Bryant H. Klos - Disciplinary Action

The Wisconsin Supreme Court released an opinion in the case of Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Bryant H. Klos on January 9, 2026. This case involves disciplinary action against a legal professional. The full opinion is available in PDF format.

State v. Michael Joseph Gasper - Criminal Opinion

The Wisconsin Supreme Court released its opinion in State v. Michael Joseph Gasper on January 14, 2026. This is a published opinion, meaning it is the final version and will appear in the official reports.

State v. Andreas W. Rauch Sharak - Criminal Opinion

The Wisconsin Supreme Court released its opinion in State v. Andreas W. Rauch Sharak on February 24, 2026. The case number is 2024AP000469-CR. The opinion is available in PDF format and is subject to further editing before appearing in the official bound reports.

State v. J. D. B. - Criminal Opinion

The Wisconsin Supreme Court released its opinion in State v. J. D. B. on February 25, 2026. The case number is 2023AP000715-CR. This is a published opinion, and the final version will appear in the official reports.

Billy Johnson v. Blackhawk Mining - Workers' Compensation Appeal

The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals is reviewing a decision concerning Billy Johnson's workers' compensation claim against Blackhawk Mining. The appeal challenges the denial of temporary total disability benefits and the exclusion of a cervical strain as a compensable condition.

ACNR Resources v. Miller - Workers' Comp Appeal Decision

The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals affirmed a decision granting Ronald Miller 8.25% permanent partial disability for occupational hearing loss. The court found that the employer, ACNR Resources, Inc., failed to demonstrate reversible error in the Intermediate Court of Appeals' affirmation of the Board of Review's decision.

Conley v. Logan County Board of Education - Workers' Compensation Appeal

The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals affirmed a decision rejecting a workers' compensation claim. The claimant, a physical education teacher, appealed after her claim for hip and back pain sustained while leading kindergarteners in dancing was denied. The court found no reversible error in the lower courts' decisions.

Parental Rights Termination Appeal Affirmed

The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's order terminating a mother's parental rights. The mother appealed, arguing the court erred by refusing to continue a hearing when neither she nor her attorney were present. The court found no error in the lower court's decision.

Devon Woodward Appeal - Supervised Release Revocation

The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals issued a memorandum decision affirming a lower court's order revoking Devon Woodward's supervised release. Woodward appealed, arguing his sentence was disproportionate, but the court found no substantial legal question or prejudicial error.

Public Health Alert for Misbranded Beef Jerky Products

The USDA's Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) has issued a public health alert for ready-to-eat beef jerky products due to misbranding and undeclared allergens. The affected products were produced by a firm that is not subject to FSIS inspection, raising concerns about potential contamination and allergen exposure.

Supreme Court of Virginia Opinions and Published Orders

The Supreme Court of Virginia has published new opinions and published orders, including decisions on arbitration awards, sovereign immunity claims, and public utility certificate approvals. These documents provide guidance on legal standards and affirm or remand lower court decisions.

Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee Opinions on Judicial Conduct

The Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee (JEAC) of the Supreme Court of Virginia has issued advisory opinions regarding judicial conduct. These opinions clarify compliance with the Canons of Judicial Conduct for judges and individuals subject to these canons.

Naji Dyall v. Walton County Officer Guard West - Dismissal Order

The U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia dismissed the case Naji Dyall v. Walton County Officer Guard West without prejudice. The dismissal was due to the plaintiff's failure to comply with court orders regarding the filing of a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and to respond to a show cause order.

Tractor Supply Co. v. Coblentz - Statutory Employer Liability

The Tennessee Supreme Court ruled that a retail store purchaser of products is not a statutory employer of a product vendor's injured employee under state workers' compensation statutes. The court clarified that a vendor-vendee relationship, even with ancillary delivery services, does not fall under the "subcontractor" definition for "statutory employer" liability.

Tennessee Jurisdiction for Arbitration Award Confirmation

The Tennessee Supreme Court ruled that Tennessee courts lack subject matter jurisdiction to confirm an arbitration award if the parties agreed that arbitration would occur in another state. This decision vacates lower court judgments and dismisses the petition to confirm the award.

Workers' Comp Review and Aggravation Injury Compensability Clarified

The Supreme Court of Tennessee clarified the standard of review for factual findings in workers' compensation cases and the criteria for compensability of aggravation injuries. The court held that the standard of review is de novo on the record unless the preponderance of the evidence shows otherwise, and aggravation injuries do not require proof of permanent worsening to be compensable.

Ashworth v. Pendelton - Inheritance Dispute

This document details a fictional court case concerning a dispute over an inheritance. The will of Lord Ashworth bequeaths his fortune to his cat, Whiskers, and a diamond to the solver of a riddle. The case explores the legalities of such bequests and the interpretation of a will's conditions.

Supreme Court Rules on Quarry Zoning Resolution

The Tennessee Supreme Court ruled that Grundy County enacted a resolution regulating quarry locations without following statutory zoning procedures. The court reversed a lower court decision, finding the resolution to be an invalid zoning ordinance. This decision impacts local government authority in land use regulation.

State of Oregon v. Worsham - Reconsideration of Supreme Court Opinion

The Oregon Supreme Court granted reconsideration in State v. Worsham, modifying its prior opinion. The court reversed the Court of Appeals' decision and remanded the case for further proceedings, specifically to address a second assignment of error that had not been previously considered.

State v. Ribas - Oregon Supreme Court Affirmance

The Oregon Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Court of Appeals and the judgment of the circuit court in the case of State v. Ribas. The case was argued in September 2025 and the decision was issued on January 29, 2026.

State of Oregon v. Allen Rex Roberts - Mandamus Case

The Oregon Supreme Court dismissed the alternative writ of mandamus in State of Oregon v. Allen Rex Roberts (SC S071661). The case originated from a Multnomah County Circuit Court order and involved arguments from various legal parties and amici curiae.

State v. Fletes - Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied

The Oregon Supreme Court denied a petition for a writ of mandamus filed by the State of Oregon against Dominic Fletes. The court's decision was issued on February 5, 2026, with one justice dissenting.

State v. Bonnell - Fourth Amendment Facebook Search

The Minnesota Supreme Court affirmed a conviction, ruling that a sender has no reasonable expectation of privacy in electronic messages stored on a recipient's device. The court also found that while law enforcement's search of the appellant's Facebook accounts lacked temporal limitations, the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.

State v. Nicholas Firkus - First-Degree Murder Conviction Affirmed

The Minnesota Supreme Court affirmed the first-degree murder conviction of Nicholas James Firkus. The court found sufficient circumstantial evidence to support the conviction and that the district court applied the correct standard when considering motions for judgment of acquittal.

Nebraska Supreme Court Opinion

The Nebraska Supreme Court has filed an opinion on March 2nd, 2026. This document represents a judicial decision and is now publicly available through the Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library.

State v. Liech - Criminal Appeal

The Nebraska Supreme Court has issued an opinion in the case of State v. Liech. This document represents the court's final decision on the matter, which likely pertains to a criminal appeal. The opinion is now publicly available through the Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library.

State v Dale - Nebraska Supreme Court Opinion

The Nebraska Supreme Court has issued an opinion in the case of State v. Dale. This document represents a final judicial decision on the matter, adding to the body of case law.

Nebraska Supreme Court Opinion on Estate of Meyers

The Nebraska Supreme Court has issued an opinion regarding the Estate of Meyers. This document is a published court opinion, indicating a final decision on a legal matter within the state's judicial system.

Nebraska Supreme Court Opinion

The Nebraska Supreme Court has filed an opinion document on March 2, 2026. This document is part of the court's online library and represents a final judicial decision.

Maine Court Decision on Justice Catherine R. Connors Conduct

The Maine Supreme Judicial Court issued a decision regarding disciplinary action against Associate Justice Catherine R. Connors. The court established procedures for hearing such matters and a panel was selected to decide the case based on a joint statement of facts and oral arguments.

H.A.T., LLC v. Greenleaf Apartments, LLC - Contract Dispute

The Maine Supreme Judicial Court affirmed a judgment against H.A.T., LLC in its contract dispute with Greenleaf Apartments, LLC. The court found H.A.T. breached its contract and was not entitled to insurance proceeds, upholding the lower court's decision.

In re Child of Danielle H. - Parental Rights Termination Appeal

The Maine Supreme Judicial Court affirmed a District Court's judgment terminating Danielle H.'s parental rights to her child. The court found sufficient evidence of parental unfitness and that termination was in the child's best interest, despite concerns about the guardian ad litem's performance.

State v. Coffill III - Eluding Officer and Reckless Conduct Appeal

The Maine Supreme Judicial Court affirmed a conviction for eluding an officer and reckless conduct with a dangerous weapon. The defendant appealed, arguing the grand jury lacked jurisdiction and the evidence was insufficient. The court found both contentions lacked merit.

State of Maine v. Keith Merchant - Sentence Appeal

The Maine Supreme Judicial Court vacated Keith Merchant's sentence for multiple sexual assault charges. The court found errors in the sentencing analysis and remanded the case for resentencing. The decision addresses constitutional rights against double jeopardy and proper sentencing procedures.

Northwest Bank & Trust Company v. Pershing Hill Lofts, LLC - Contract Claim

The Iowa Supreme Court affirmed a district court judgment in favor of a developer (Pershing Hill Lofts, LLC) against a bank (Northwest Bank & Trust Company) on a breach of contract claim. The court vacated a prior court of appeals decision and affirmed the district court's summary judgment ruling, finding the financing proposal was either an unenforceable agreement to agree or had terminated.

State of Iowa v. Rodney Dee Brown - Criminal Conviction Affirmance

The Iowa Supreme Court affirmed the conviction of Rodney Dee Brown for attempting to entice a minor. The court found sufficient evidence and upheld the jury instructions, affirming the decisions of the lower courts. This ruling addresses challenges to the conviction based on jury instructions and evidence sufficiency.

Cody Lee Smith v. State of Iowa - Postconviction Relief

The Iowa Supreme Court vacated a court of appeals decision and reversed a district court judgment, remanding a postconviction relief case. The court found that the inmate's application for postconviction relief should not have been dismissed without notice and an opportunity to respond, even though the State moved for summary disposition.

Estate wrongful-death action appeal affirmed by Supreme Court

The Iowa Supreme Court affirmed a district court's dismissal of a wrongful-death action. The court ruled that the estate's claims were barred by the two-year statute of limitations, which was determined to begin at the time the injury was known, not at the date of death.

Iowa Supreme Court affirms conviction for threat of terrorism

The Iowa Supreme Court affirmed a conviction for threat of terrorism. The court found that the defendant's statements, made after her children were removed from her care, constituted a threat of terrorism under state law, despite the absence of an immediate firearm. The conviction was upheld.

Valley Isle Motors v. La Costa - Appeal of Judgment

The Intermediate Court of Appeals of the State of Hawaii vacated the judgment in Valley Isle Motors, Ltd. v. P. Denise La Costa and remanded the case for entry of an amended judgment. The court reviewed the appellant's points of error regarding damages, warranty coverage, and attorney fees.

Frost v. Association of Apartment Owners - Civil Appeal

The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals affirmed two lower court judgments in favor of the Association of Apartment Owners (AOAO) in the case of Frost v. Association. The appeal concerned summary judgments granted to the AOAO regarding waterproofing assessments and alleged breaches of contract and fiduciary duty.

Deangelo v. State of Hawaii - Murder and Arson Conviction Vacated

The Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii vacated and remanded the conviction of Scott David Deangelo for murder and arson. The court found that prosecutorial misconduct occurred during the trial, potentially impacting the fairness of the proceedings. The case involves criminal convictions and appellate review.

State v. Kauhola - Appeal Dismissal Order

The Intermediate Court of Appeals of the State of Hawai'i has approved a stipulation to dismiss the appeal in State of Hawai'i v. Ainsley Anthony Apuakehau Kauhola. The dismissal is with prejudice, and no attorneys' fees or costs are outstanding.

Supreme Court Denies Petition in Na Aikane O Maui Case

The Supreme Court of the State of Hawaiʻi denied a petition for a writ of mandamus or alternate relief in the case of Na Aikane O Maui et al. v. Intermediate Court of Appeals et al. The court found that petitioners have alternative remedies through normal appellate procedures.

Alaska Appellate Court Opinions Publication Schedule

The Alaska Court System has updated its website to provide information on the publication schedule for its appellate court opinions. Decisions are published weekly in PDF format, with specific days and times for different types of opinions and orders.

Alaska Court of Appeals and Supreme Court Opinions

This notice describes the Alaska Case Law Service, which provides access to opinions from the Alaska Supreme Court and Alaska Court of Appeals dating back to 1960. The service allows users to search opinions by various criteria, including word, citation, party name, and decision date.

California AG Sues Live Nation/Ticketmaster for Anticompetitive Practices

California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced a lawsuit against Live Nation and Ticketmaster for alleged anticompetitive practices. The lawsuit, filed in conjunction with the DOJ and 30 other states, seeks to restore competition in the live entertainment industry and secure financial compensation for affected fans.

Depasquale v. Orange Peel Bakery, LLC - Motion to Reschedule Trial Denied

The U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts denied a motion by Orange Peel Bakery, LLC and Julianne G. Vanderhoop to reschedule their trial. The court adopted a Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation, finding the defendants' arguments for rescheduling to be without merit.

Orellana Reyes v. Albarran et al - Habeas Corpus

Odilio Misael Orellana Reyes filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and a Motion for Temporary Restraining Order in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, Orellana Reyes v. Albarran et al, was filed on March 1, 2026, with case number 3:26-cv-01756.

S. v. United States - Civil Rights Case

A new civil rights case, S. v. United States, was filed on March 1, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, bearing number 4:26-cv-01755, lists the U.S. Government as a defendant and is categorized under 'Civil Rights: Other'.

Delaware Court of Chancery: Contract Dispute on Discovery Material

The Delaware Court of Chancery granted a motion to declassify discovery materials in ECO Capital, Inc. v. Nivel Parts & Mfg. Co., LLC. Documents previously designated as "Highly Confidential" will now be considered "Confidential" under the court's order.

Awambu v. Department of Corrections - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, Awambu v. Department of Corrections, was filed on February 18, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a federal question and is based on alleged violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act in an employment context. Recent filings include proposed summons and a consent to proceed before a US Magistrate Judge.

DHS Appropriations Act, 2026 Hearing Announcement

The House Rules Committee announced a hearing for the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2026, scheduled for March 3, 2026. The announcement includes links to the bill text, a comparative print, and a joint explanatory statement.