Supreme Court: ISPs not liable for user copyright infringement without intent

The Supreme Court ruled that Internet Service Providers (ISPs) are not liable for user copyright infringement solely based on knowledge of the infringement. The decision in Cox Communications Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment clarifies that intent to encourage infringement or providing a service primarily for infringing uses is required for ISP liability. This ruling may impact how platforms are expected to enforce terms of service against infringing users.

PMPRB Proposes Practice Directions for Hearings and Seeks Feedback

The Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB) has published seven proposed Practice Directions for its hearings, seeking public feedback by May 4, 2026. These proposals aim to modernize procedures, standardize document exchange, and expedite certain proceedings, including the use of AI.

Court Grants Summary Judgment, Finds No Copyright Infringement

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York granted summary judgment to defendants in Freeman v. Deebs-Elkenaney, finding no copyright infringement. The court determined that similarities between the plaintiff's unpublished drafts and the defendants' bestselling novel series were limited to unprotectable tropes common to the genre.

Sync Licensing Control: Retaining Approval Rights After Copyright Assignment

This article discusses how artists and creators can retain control over sync licensing by negotiating upfront approval rights, even after assigning copyright ownership. It highlights the distinction between consultation rights and approval rights, using recent disputes as case studies to emphasize the importance of strategic contract drafting in protecting brand alignment and public perception.

FTC Warns Auto Dealers on Vehicle Price Advertising

The FTC sent warning letters to 97 auto dealership groups regarding deceptive vehicle price advertising practices. The agency stated that advertised prices must reflect the total cost to consumers, excluding only government charges, to comply with Section 5 of the FTC Act.

Indiana Prohibits Virtual Currency Kiosks

Indiana Governor Mike Braun signed House Bill 1116 into law, prohibiting the operation of virtual currency kiosks in the state. Violations are now considered deceptive acts actionable under the Indiana Deceptive Consumer Sales Act, with potential liability for property owners who knowingly permit kiosk operations. The law is effective immediately.

Digital Platform Services Face Consumer Law Scrutiny

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) is increasing scrutiny on digital platform services regarding consumer law, focusing on design choices and user journeys rather than just marketing. In-house counsel should address potential unconscionable conduct and misleading practices arising from platform design.

Employer Contributions to Section 530A Trump Accounts

The IRS has provided guidance on employer contributions to new Section 530A Trump Accounts, established by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025. Employers can contribute up to $2,500 annually per employee or dependent, which is excluded from taxable earnings. Further guidance on non-discrimination rules is anticipated.

UK Pensions Law Digest: Pension Schemes Bill, IHT, PPF, TPR Updates

This UK pensions law digest summarizes recent developments including House of Lords amendments to the Pension Schemes Bill, updates on Inheritance Tax legislation, Pension Protection Fund levy rules for 2026/27, and new guidance from the Pensions Regulator. It also covers consultations on simplified pension advice and reporting standards.

Tax Incentives Review for Renewable Energy Sector Changes in Brazil

Mayer Brown has released an analysis of Brazil's Complementary Law No. 224/2025, which revises tax incentives for the renewable energy sector. The new law presents challenges for investors and developers, impacting project viability and financial structuring.

EU Legal Professional Privilege Challenged by AI Confidentiality Risks

This article discusses how the adoption of Generative AI tools poses new challenges to legal professional privilege (LPP) under EU law. It highlights concerns that using AI may inadvertently undermine LPP protections, potentially exposing communications to public authorities. The guidance aims to identify key challenges and offer practical advice for safeguarding LPP.

Trump Administration AI Regulation Framework and Proposed Bill

The Trump administration released a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence, outlining a non-binding 'wish list' for federal AI regulation. This framework, alongside a draft bill from Senator Marsha Blackburn, signals significant movement towards comprehensive federal AI legislation, emphasizing federal preemption of state laws and a 'light-touch' approach using existing agencies.

AI Pricing and Evidence Avoidance: Competition Law Risks

JD Supra highlights emerging competition law risks associated with AI-powered pricing and evidence avoidance tools. The guidance warns companies that traditional antitrust principles apply to algorithmic conduct, citing enforcement actions in the EU, UK, and US that have resulted in significant fines.

Identifying AI-Generated Evidence and Holding Counsel Accountable

This article from JD Supra discusses the increasing prevalence of AI-generated evidence in legal proceedings and provides guidance for attorneys on how to identify and authenticate such evidence. It emphasizes the importance of critical evaluation, metadata analysis, and expert consultation to ensure the integrity of evidence and hold counsel accountable for its use.

European Cybersecurity M&A Climbs Amid Accelerating AI-Driven Attacks

European cybersecurity M&A is projected to increase due to a rise in AI-driven attacks and new EU regulations like NIS2 and the Cyber Resilience Act. The European cybersecurity market is expected to grow significantly, driven by increased investment and regulatory mandates for enhanced cyber defenses.

Oklahoma Enacts Comprehensive State Privacy Law

Oklahoma has enacted its 21st state-level comprehensive privacy law, Enrolled Senate Bill No. 546, which will take effect on January 1, 2027. The law grants consumers specific privacy rights and imposes obligations on businesses regarding data processing, security, and disclosures, enforced by the Attorney General.

Oklahoma Enacts Comprehensive Consumer Data Privacy Law

Oklahoma has enacted Senate Bill 546, establishing its comprehensive consumer data privacy law, making it the 21st state with such legislation. The law applies to businesses meeting specific data processing thresholds and grants consumers rights similar to those in other state privacy laws.

Sustainability Spotlight: Q4 2025 Legal Update on SEC Proxy Advisors

JD Supra's Q4 2025 Sustainability Spotlight highlights the SEC's actions to regulate proxy advisors and state AGs challenging 'greenwashing' by Big Tech. The update also notes litigation concerning electric vehicle rentals.

California Suspends Enforcement of Venture Capital Diversity Reporting Law

The California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI) announced on March 17, 2026, that it is suspending enforcement of the Fair Investment Practices by Venture Capital Companies Law (FIPVCC). This suspension is effective until further notice, pending the completion of a rulemaking process and adoption of final regulations, delaying the April 1, 2026, reporting deadline.

2025 NBIOs: Success Rates and Engagement Trends Analysis

JD Supra Securities released an analysis of Non-Binding Indicative Offers (NBIOs) and pre-bid stakes in public M&A for calendar year 2025. The analysis shows a 30% success rate for NBIOs, consistent with prior years, but a significant drop in private equity success rates to 14%. Engagement periods have also extended.

Healthcare Authority Newsletter - March 2026

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has doubled its nursing home staffing campaign funding to $200 million. The newsletter also highlights state encouragement for ACA signups, physicians forming IPAs, increased healthcare IT and cybersecurity investments, a report urging reform of private equity investment in healthcare, and CMS's efforts to leverage AI for Medicare beneficiaries.

FTC Creates Healthcare Task Force

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has established an internal Healthcare Task Force to enhance enforcement and policy efforts related to competitive and affordable healthcare. The task force aims to improve knowledge sharing, identify emerging issues like AI in healthcare, and expand inter-agency collaboration.

CDC Solicitation of Nominations for Mine Safety and Health Research Advisory Committee

The CDC is soliciting nominations for membership on the Mine Safety and Health Research Advisory Committee (MSHRAC). The committee consists of 10 experts in mining safety and health research and practice. Nominations are due by April 22, 2026.

CMS Seeks Letters of Intent for Medicare Lifestyle Intervention Funding

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) is seeking letters of intent for the MAHA ELEVATE Model, a new funding opportunity to pilot lifestyle interventions within Original Medicare. Approximately $100 million will be awarded over three years to 30 cooperative agreements, with letters of intent due by April 10, 2026.

EU Privacy Regulators Issue Opinion on Proposed Biotech Act

The European Data Protection Board (EDPB) and European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) issued a joint opinion on the proposed EU Biotech Act. The opinion supports the act's goals but calls for clarification on GDPR compliance, data processing, consent, AI obligations, and data retention for clinical trials involving medicinal products.

Home Construction Permit Fee Scams Target Homeowners

The New Hampshire Security Team issued a scam alert regarding fraudulent emails targeting homeowners undertaking construction projects. The emails falsely demand immediate payment for permit fees via wire transfer, payment apps, or cryptocurrency, aiming to defraud recipients.

SAPWG Proposes Statutory Accounting Changes and Derivatives Guidance

The NAIC's Statutory Accounting Principles Working Group exposed proposed changes to statutory accounting, including guidance on derivatives, residential mortgage loans, and disclosures. Public comments are being accepted on these items until May 1.

Consumer Financial Services Updates: AI, Crypto, Student Loans, FinCEN

This newsletter from Troutman Pepper Locke summarizes federal and state activities impacting the consumer financial services industry. Key updates include President Trump's AI legislative framework, and CFTC FAQs on crypto assets and blockchain technologies for financial institutions.

Colombia Decree on MIPYMES Capital Markets Access via Securitization

Colombia's Financial Regulation Unit (URF) has published a draft decree allowing micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises (MIPYMES) to access capital markets through securitization. The proposal aims to address the significant financing gap faced by these businesses by establishing specific rules for asset-backed securitization processes.

Subscription Lines as Liquidity Tools for BDCs and Interval Funds

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP discusses how subscription credit facilities can help Business Development Companies (BDCs) and interval funds manage redemption pressures. The article highlights the benefits of these facilities in the current liquidity environment and differentiates between BDC and interval fund structures.

FinCEN Issues Implementation Guidance for All-Cash Real Estate Reporting Rule

FinCEN has issued implementation guidance for its rule requiring reporting on certain all-cash residential real estate transactions involving legal entities or trusts. The reporting requirements begin March 1, 2026, and will affect attorneys, title companies, and settlement agents, introducing new information collection and filing obligations.

JLG 279 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. - Civil Suit Filing

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California has filed a new civil case, JLG 279 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al. The case was filed on March 27, 2026, with JLG 279 listed as the plaintiff and Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC, and Rasier-CA, LLC as defendants. The nature of the suit is listed as 'P.I.: Other' under Diversity jurisdiction.

Carrillo v. L.A.S.D. et al - Prisoner Condition Civil Case

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California has filed a new civil case, Carrillo v. L.A.S.D. et al, on March 27, 2026. The case involves a prisoner's claim regarding prison conditions and is based on federal question jurisdiction.

Roe CL 298 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. - Personal Injury Product Liability

A civil case, Roe CL 298 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al., was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on March 27, 2026. The case involves a complaint for personal injury and product liability, with a filing fee of $405.

Roe CL 299 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. - Personal Injury Product Liability

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California has filed a new civil case, Roe CL 299 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. The case, classified under Diversity Jurisdiction and Nature of Suit for Personal Injury Product Liability, was filed on March 27, 2026, with an initial filing fee of $405.

Voltstar Technologies v. Logitech Inc. - Patent Infringement

Voltstar Technologies, Inc. has filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Logitech Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The complaint was filed on March 27, 2026, initiating a new civil case focused on alleged patent violations.

Nadler v. Borla et al - Prisoner Condition Complaint

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California has filed a new civil case, Nadler v. Borla et al. The case involves a prisoner's complaint regarding prison conditions and was filed on March 27, 2026. The court has issued notices regarding the filing fee and assignment to a magistrate judge.

Walker v. Majoros - Civil Rights Case

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California has filed a new civil rights case, Walker v. Majoros (Case No. 3:26-cv-02727). The case was removed from Alameda County Superior Court, with the initial filing on March 27, 2026, by Steven Majoros.

Sharma v. Uber Technologies Inc. - Civil Case Filing

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California has filed a new civil case, Sharma et al v. Uber Technologies Inc. et al. The complaint was filed on March 27, 2026, and names Uber Technologies Inc. and the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority as defendants. Filing fees were paid, and proposed summons were submitted.

Davis v. Schultz - Habeas Corpus Filing

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California has filed a Habeas Corpus petition in the case of Davis v. Schultz. The filing fee was $5.00, and the case was filed by Anthony James Davis.

Valeriano-Delacruz v. Brazelton et al - Civil Rights Complaint

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California has filed a new civil rights complaint in the case of Valeriano-Delacruz v. Brazelton et al. The complaint, filed on March 27, 2026, concerns prisoner conditions. This filing initiates the legal process for the case.

Patel v. USCIS - Other Immigration Actions

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California has filed a new civil case, Patel v. USCIS. The case involves 'Other Immigration Actions' and was filed on March 27, 2026, with a complaint seeking a writ of mandamus and declaratory and injunctive relief against USCIS and other government officials.

Diaz v. Collegiate Hotel Group - Civil Case Filing

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California has filed a new civil case, Diaz v. Collegiate Hotel Group, on March 27, 2026. The case involves a Notice of Removal from Santa Clara Superior Court, with Collegiate Hotel Group listed as the filing party.

Hartman v. Aramark Services, Inc. - Labor: Fair Standards

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California has filed a new case, Hartman v. Aramark Services, Inc. The case involves a Notice of Removal to Federal Court from Contra Costa Superior Court, with the nature of suit identified as Labor: Fair Standards. Aramark Services, Inc. is the defendant.

Gu v. Rubio et al - Other Immigration Actions

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California has filed a new civil case, Gu v. Rubio et al (Case 5:26-cv-02734). The case involves 'Other Immigration Actions' and was filed on March 27, 2026, with an initial filing of a Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

Mullin v. San Mateo PDP Administrators - Civil Rights Case Filed

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California has filed a new civil rights case, Mullin v. County of San Mateo Private Defender Program (PDP) Administrators. The case, filed on March 27, 2026, under the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, involves a prisoner's complaint against the San Mateo PDP Administrators.

Gibbs v. BB OPCO LLC et al - Contract Dispute

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California has filed a new civil case, Gibbs v. BB OPCO LLC et al. The case involves a contract dispute and was filed on March 27, 2026, with a federal question basis. BB OPCO LLC filed a Notice of Removal from Sonoma Superior Court.

Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security - Social Security Disability Insurance

A civil case was filed on March 27, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security, involves a complaint related to Social Security benefits.

Lin et al v. USCIS - Other Immigration Actions

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California has filed a new civil case, Lin et al v. USCIS. The case, classified as 'Other Immigration Actions,' was filed on March 27, 2026, with a complaint against the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and other government officials. The court has issued summons and a procedural order for this immigration mandamus case.

Mendivil v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company et al - Civil

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California has filed a new civil case, Mendivil v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company et al. The case is based on a Federal Question and falls under the Nature of Suit category of Labor: E.R.I.S.A. The filing date was March 27, 2026.