Changeflow GovPing

What do you monitor?

Curated feeds for your role. Pick your area and get exactly the sources you need.

Recent changes

Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Johnson v. San Bruno County Jail - Civil Rights Prisoner Condition

A new civil case, Johnson v. San Bruno County Jail et al., was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on March 19, 2026. The case, identified by Case Number 3:26-cv-02257-AGT, alleges violations under the Civil Rights Act concerning prison conditions.

Routine Enforcement Criminal Justice
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Rusow v. Jolie Skin Company - Civil Fraud Case

A civil fraud case, Rusow v. Jolie Skin Company, Inc., was filed on March 19, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves allegations of fraud, with plaintiffs Kourtney Rusow and Arnetta Williams initiating the suit against Jolie Skin Company, Inc.

Priority review Enforcement Consumer Protection
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Boylett v. Meta Platforms - Contract Dispute

A new civil case, Boylett v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al., was filed on March 19, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a contract dispute and was filed by JEFFREY BOYLETT.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

NLG v. Uber Technologies - Personal Injury Case Filed

A new civil case, NLG (R.J.) v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al., was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on March 19, 2026. The case is classified as a civil case based on diversity jurisdiction and involves a claim for personal injury.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Baldwin v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America - ERISA Case

A new civil ERISA case, Baldwin v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case was filed on March 19, 2026, and involves a complaint against UNUM Life Insurance Company of America.

Routine Enforcement Employment & Labor
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Clark v. City of Richmond - Civil Rights Case

A new civil rights case, Clark v. City of Richmond, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on March 19, 2026. The case was removed from Contra Costa County Superior Court. The filing fee was $405.

Routine Enforcement Civil Rights
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Jang v. The Hartford - ERISA Labor Case Filing

A new civil case, Jang v. The Hartford, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on March 19, 2026. The case is based on a federal question and falls under the Labor: E.R.I.S.A. nature of suit category. The initial complaint and case management order have been filed.

Routine Enforcement Employment & Labor
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Mobarakeh v. Classica Cruise Operator Ltd. Inc. - TCPA Suit

A new civil case was filed on March 19, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The suit, Mobarakeh v. Classica Cruise Operator Ltd. Inc., alleges violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The filing includes a complaint, proposed summons, and other initial procedural documents.

Priority review Enforcement Consumer Protection
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Coy v. Southwest Airlines Co. - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, Coy v. Southwest Airlines Co., was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on March 19, 2026. The case was removed from Santa Clara Superior Court, with Southwest Airlines Co. listed as the defendant.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.irs.gov

IRS Guidance on Section 4960 Excise Tax Refund Claims

The IRS issued a Generic Legal Advice Memorandum (GLAM) clarifying that remuneration paid by a tax-exempt organization (ATEO) to a covered employee is subject to the Section 4960 excise tax on excess remuneration, even if the organization is part of an affiliated group with a covered health insurance provider. The GLAM states that reliance on prior reasoning that would exempt such remuneration is not a reasonable interpretation of the statute.

Priority review Guidance Taxation

Showing 14101–14110 of 31,680 changes

1 1409 1410 1411 1412 1413 3168

Get alerts when regulations change

Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.