GAO Report: IRS AI Use Lacks Skills, Data Quality, and Strategic Management

A GAO report released March 24, 2026, found that the IRS faces significant risks in its use of artificial intelligence due to staffing reductions, incomplete inventory of AI applications, and a lack of strategic management. The report highlights that the IRS may not have the necessary skilled workforce or a comprehensive plan to support its growing AI initiatives.

VA Software License Management Challenges Require Further Action

The GAO has issued a statement for the Congressional Record regarding the Department of Veterans Affairs' (VA) software licensing practices. The report highlights challenges in tracking software licenses and managing restrictive licensing practices that impact cloud computing efforts, recommending further action by the VA.

WHB 2154 v. Uber Technologies - Summons Issued

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California has issued a summons in the case of WHB 2154 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al. The summons was issued on March 24, 2026, for Rasier, LLC, Rasier-CA, LLC, and Uber Technologies, Inc. The underlying complaint was filed on March 20, 2026.

Baha'is Win Trademark Ruling Against Chase; Summary Judgment Granted on Federal Claims

The U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado granted summary judgment to the National Spiritual Assembly of the Baha'is of the United States in their trademark dispute against Neal Chase. The court found that a prior decision by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) was outcome determinative for the federal claims.

Payment Brokers Group v. Agentra - Court Denies New Trial Motion

The U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado denied a motion for a new trial filed by defendants Agentra, LLC, BID Dental, LLC, MyHealthPass, LLC, and Innovative Health Insurance Partners, LLC. The court upheld a previous judgment awarding $1.3 million in damages.

Rigato v. Camey - Plaintiff's Motion for Counsel Denied

The District Court of Colorado denied a plaintiff's motion for appointment of pro bono counsel without prejudice. The court found that while counsel would aid the pro se plaintiff, it was not appropriate at this time given the case's current stage and the plaintiff's allegations.

O'Neil v. Denver - Denial of Counsel and PACER Fee Exemption

The District Court for the District of Colorado denied a plaintiff's request for appointed counsel and an exemption from PACER fees. The court found the request for counsel premature and the PACER exemption request lacked sufficient demonstration of need.

James Berns v. State Farm - Certified Question to Colorado Supreme Court

The U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado has certified a question regarding insurance bad faith law to the Colorado Supreme Court. The case, James Berns v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, involves a dispute over whether an insurer's duty to settle is suspended once a lawsuit is filed and there is a disagreement on damages.

McMillan v. Mountain Medicinals - Motion to Dismiss Granted

The District Court for the District of Colorado granted Defendant Mountain Medicinals, LLC's motion to dismiss in the case of Kelsee McMillan v. Mountain Medicinals, LLC. The court also denied the Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. The case involved claims of gender discrimination, sexual harassment, and retaliation.

Beachley v. Trans Union, LLC - Sanction Award

The District Court of Colorado has issued an order addressing a defendant's motion for fees and costs, awarding $71,886 as a sanction against the plaintiff for their conduct. This award follows a previous recommendation to dismiss the plaintiff's claims and impose sanctions.