Pennsylvania Superior Court Opinion on Parental Rights Termination

The Pennsylvania Superior Court affirmed orders terminating the parental rights of K.H. and E.H. to their two minor daughters. The appeals concerned orders entered by the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, which granted petitions from the Allegheny County Office of Children, Youth and Families (CYF). The termination was based on concerns including substance abuse, homelessness, and neglect.

Brown v. Kudranski - Child Custody and School Choice Dispute

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued a non-precedential decision in Brown v. Kudranski, addressing a child custody dispute concerning school choice. The court affirmed an order directing the child to attend school in the father's district.

Commonwealth v. Clary, D. - Criminal Appeal

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania affirmed the denial of Daniel Khalil Clary's petition for post-conviction relief. The appeal stems from a 2017 incident where Clary was convicted of attempted murder of law enforcement officers and other charges.

Com. v. Ross, W. - Pennsylvania Superior Court Opinion

The Pennsylvania Superior Court has issued a non-precedential opinion in the case of Commonwealth v. Ross, W. The case is identified by docket number 2035 EDA 2025. This opinion does not appear to cite any other authorities or be cited by any other cases.

Commonwealth v. Deas - Non-Precedential Court Opinion

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued a non-precedential opinion affirming the judgment of sentence for Corey Deas, who pleaded guilty to retail theft. The court granted the appellant's counsel's petition to withdraw.

Commonwealth v. D.S. - Criminal Appeal Opinion

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued a non-precedential combined opinion by Judge Lazarus in the case of Commonwealth v. D.S. The appeal concerns a judgment of sentence entered following convictions for indecent assault of a minor and endangering the welfare of a child. The court affirmed the judgment.

Potts v. Potts - Custody Dispute Opinion

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued a non-precedential opinion in the case of Potts v. Potts, concerning a custody dispute. The court affirmed the lower court's order granting primary physical custody of the minor children to the mother. The appeal was filed by the father.

Com. v. Bryte, C. - Criminal Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a non-precedential opinion affirming the judgment of sentence for Chanze Stephen Bryte. Bryte was convicted of possession of a firearm prohibited and sentenced to six to twelve years of incarceration.

T.C. v. G.R.C. v. M.N.G. - Custody Appeal

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued a combined opinion affirming a lower court's order granting primary physical and sole legal custody to the mother and permitting her relocation. The appeal was filed by the maternal grandmother.

Robinson v. Singleton - Child Support Appeal

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued a combined opinion in Robinson v. Singleton, concerning a child support appeal. The court remanded the case with instructions, noting procedural issues with the trial court's order and opinion.

Com. v. Alexander, L. - Appeal Quashed

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania quashed an appeal filed by Louis E. Alexander. The court found that Alexander was appealing a non-final order, specifically the denial of his motion to disqualify the PCRA court judge. The appeal was dismissed as premature.

Evans Resources, L.P. v. Petroplex Energy, Inc. - Contract Dispute

The Texas Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's summary judgment in favor of Petroplex Energy, Inc. and the Anwars in a contract dispute with Evans Resources, L.P. The court found that Evans Resources, L.P. take nothing from the Anwars.

Dylan Scott Reynolds v. State of Texas - Injury to Child Case Dismissed

The Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District, has dismissed the appeal in Dylan Scott Reynolds v. The State of Texas. The appellant, found guilty of injury to an elderly individual, voluntarily moved to dismiss his own appeal.

Aashaud McVea v. State of Texas - Murder Appeal

The Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District, filed an opinion affirming the conviction of Aashaud McVea for murder. The court addressed six issues raised by the appellant concerning self-defense, jury instructions, evidence admission, and closing arguments.

CMA Consumer Forum Meeting Notes Published

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has published the meeting notes from its Consumer Forum held on 10 February 2026. These notes document discussions aimed at ensuring consumer perspectives are integrated into the CMA's ongoing work.

CMA Consumer Forum Terms of Reference Published

The UK's Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has published the terms of reference for its Consumer Forum. This forum brings together the CMA and UK consumer representative organisations to ensure consumer perspectives are central to the CMA's work.

Candace Lanette Sneed Reinstated to Practice Law

The Supreme Court of Georgia has ordered the reinstatement of Candace Lanette Sneed to the practice of law in the state. This decision follows the Court's review of a compliance notice submitted by the State Bar of Georgia, confirming that Ms. Sneed has met the conditions for reinstatement.

Clemons v. Chex Systems, Inc. - New Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, Clemons v. Chex Systems, Inc., was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, identified by docket number 4:26-cv-02240, was filed on March 13, 2026, with a basis in Federal Question and concerning Consumer Credit.

NJ Scrap Tire Act Privacy Concerns

New Jersey's Scrap Tire Act, effective January 20, 2026, mandates electronic tracking of scrap tires, potentially conflicting with existing privacy laws. Businesses face criminal liability if tracking violates employee privacy statutes, creating a compliance paradox.

V8 in Chrome Vulnerable to Code Execution

CISA has added a vulnerability in Google Chrome's V8 engine to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog. The vulnerability (CVE-2026-3910) allows remote code execution and requires federal agencies to patch by March 13, 2026.

Google Chrome Skia Out-of-Bounds Write Vulnerability

CISA has added a known exploited vulnerability, CVE-2026-3909, affecting Google Chrome versions prior to 146.0.7680.75. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to perform out-of-bounds memory access via a crafted HTML page. Agencies are directed to apply mitigations by March 13, 2026.

State AGs Sue to Block Trump Administration Tariffs

Ten State Attorneys General, led by Connecticut AG William Tong, have joined a motion to block the Trump Administration's recent tariffs. The states argue the tariffs are illegal under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 and seek a court order to halt their implementation, citing potential economic harm and increased costs for consumers and businesses.

Living Lands, LLC v. Harold Ward - Environmental Law Appeal

The Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's decision in Living Lands, LLC v. Harold Ward, dismissing claims related to West Virginia's environmental reclamation activities. The court found that the plaintiffs' claims were barred by claim preclusion or failed to state a claim under the Clean Water Act.

NAACP v. SC Juvenile Justice - Rehearing En Banc Granted

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals has granted a rehearing en banc in the case of NAACP v. SC Juvenile Justice. Parties are required to file additional copies of their briefs within 10 days, and the case is tentatively scheduled for oral argument.

Sheldon v. Allergan Sales - False Claims Act

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed and remanded a False Claims Act case involving Allergan Sales, LLC. The decision clarifies the scienter requirement for liability under the Act, impacting how drug manufacturers report rebates and discounts to government programs like Medicaid.

Bolick v. Anderson - Eighth Amendment Conditions of Confinement

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals partially affirmed, vacated, and remanded Bolick v. Anderson. The court found that genuine issues of material fact preclude summary judgment on the plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim regarding inhumane conditions of confinement against Kirkland officials, but agreed the Director of the South Carolina Department of Corrections could not be held liable.

State v. Roper - Enforcement of Settlement Agreement

The Ohio Court of Appeals upheld a trial court's decision to enforce a settlement agreement in a debt collection case. The court found that the agreed-upon terms were clear and constituted a valid contract, affirming the judgment against the appellant. The original debt was for $10,199.02.

State v. Wang - Plea Validity and Sentencing

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed the validity of a guilty plea in State v. Wang but reversed the imposition of post-release control at sentencing. The court found the trial court complied with Crim.R. 11(C) regarding the plea.

State v. Street - Theft and Receiving Stolen Property Convictions

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's judgment convicting Joshua Street of theft and receiving stolen property. The court found no plain error in failing to merge the convictions, as the later use of the stolen credit card caused separate harm.

IRS Internal Revenue Bulletin 2026-12

The IRS published Internal Revenue Bulletin 2026-12, including Notice 2026-17 and Rev. Proc. 2026-11. Notice 2026-17 announces forthcoming proposed regulations on section 987 foreign currency gain or loss, and Rev. Proc. 2026-11 provides specifications for substitute employment tax forms.

Trump Tariffs Impact on US Households and Trade

A Tax Foundation analysis estimates that new tariffs imposed under Section 122 will increase taxes per US household by $600 in 2026. This follows a Supreme Court ruling that limited the scope of previous tariffs imposed under IEEPA, reducing the average applied tariff rate.

Order denying Eric Holmes' post-conviction relief motion

The Delaware Superior Court denied Eric Holmes' motion for post-conviction relief. Holmes was convicted of Possession of a Firearm by a Person Prohibited and sentenced as a habitual offender. This order addresses his latest attempt to challenge his conviction.

Order denying reconsideration in Lane v. Healthcare Services Group

The Delaware Superior Court denied a motion for reconsideration in the case of Lane v. Healthcare Services Group. The plaintiff sought reconsideration of an order denying her motion to compel the production of a child abuse report related to her employment termination case.

CLX Logistics LLC v Chase Corporation - Order on Motions to Dismiss

The Delaware Superior Court issued an order addressing motions to dismiss in a breach of contract dispute between CLX Logistics LLC and Chase Corporation. The court's decision pertains to the interpretation of termination and dispute resolution clauses within the parties' Master Transportation Services Agreement.

Andino v. Nexius Solutions - Opinion and Order on Motions in Limine

The Delaware Superior Court issued an Opinion and Order ruling on Plaintiffs' Motions in Limine in the wrongful death case Andino v. Nexius Solutions. The court addressed arguments regarding the admissibility of evidence concerning the negligence of Velex, the employer of the decedents.

Berry v. Commonwealth - Resentencing and Psychiatric Examination

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court affirmed a lower court's decision allowing a reciprocal court-ordered psychiatric examination of a defendant seeking resentencing. The defendant had presented expert testimony regarding his mental condition, prompting the Commonwealth's request for its own expert evaluation.

Ryan v. Mary Ann Morse Healthcare Corp. - Assisted Living Security Deposit Statute

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled in Ryan v. Mary Ann Morse Healthcare Corp. that community fees charged by assisted living residences (ALRs) can be considered lawful if they correspond to ALR-specific intake services. This decision clarifies the application of the security deposit statute to ALRs.

Yarahmadi v. Noem et al - Other Immigration Actions

A new civil case, Yarahmadi v. Noem et al, has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, bearing number 5:26-cv-02238, is categorized under 'Other Immigration Actions' and was filed on March 13, 2026.

MRC Research Grant Funding Opportunity

The Medical Research Council (MRC) is opening a new applicant-led research grant funding opportunity on April 7, 2026. Funding ranges from £400k to £3.1m, with grants typically covering up to 80% of full economic cost. The opportunity is open to eligible research organisations in the UK.

MRC Partnership Grant Funding Opportunity

The Medical Research Council (MRC) has announced a new partnership grant funding opportunity, opening on April 7, 2026. This grant aims to support collaborative activities between research teams, encouraging interdisciplinarity. Eligibility is restricted to UK-based research organizations and researchers.

Clean Maritime Technology Funding Opportunity

Innovate UK and the Department for Transport are offering up to £121 million in grants for innovative clean maritime technologies. UK registered organisations in collaboration can apply for funding, with the application window closing on July 15, 2026.

FCA bans Kasim Garipoglu from UK financial services

The FCA has banned Kasim Garipoglu from working in UK financial services due to a lack of honesty and integrity. Garipoglu demonstrated a disregard for regulatory requirements, undermined AML controls, and provided false information to regulators.

Liverpool Waste Investigation: Second Arrest, HGV and Excavator Seized

The Environment Agency, Joint Unit for Waste Crime, and Merseyside Police have made a second arrest in an investigation into suspected illegal waste dumping in Liverpool. An HGV and an excavator have been seized as part of the ongoing operation.

Virginia Health District Confirms Three Rabid Animals

The Central Virginia Health District confirmed three rabid animals (one raccoon, two skunks) between March 6-9, 2026, with potential contact with dogs. The notice reminds residents of Virginia's rabies vaccination laws for pets and advises on avoiding wild animals.

State v. Horn - Utah Court of Appeals Opinion

The Utah Court of Appeals filed an opinion in State v. Horn on March 12, 2026. The court affirmed the conviction of Michael Anthony Horn for failure to respond to an officer's signal to stop, rejecting his arguments regarding identification testimony and ineffective assistance of counsel.

State v. Rodriguez - Criminal Conviction Appeal

The Utah Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions and sentences of Enrique Rey Rodriguez for aggravated burglary and theft. The court found no merit in Rodriguez's arguments regarding ineffective assistance of counsel and inaccuracies in his presentence investigation report.

Glenn Whiting v. City of Athens, Tenn. - Legal Opinion and Sanctions

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a legal opinion in Glenn Whiting v. City of Athens, Tenn., addressing misconduct by the plaintiff's attorneys. The court imposed sanctions on attorneys Van Irion and Russ Egli for misrepresenting the record, citing non-existent cases, and misstating case law in their briefing.

United States v. Austin David Stafford - Sixth Circuit Opinion

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision in United States v. Austin David Stafford, upholding his convictions for producing child pornography. The court rejected Stafford's arguments regarding the factual basis for his guilty pleas and the district court's jurisdiction.

United States v. John Lohden, Jr. - Criminal Conviction Appeal

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions and sentences of Dayton Peterson and John Lohden, Jr. The defendants were convicted of kidnapping, robbery, and impersonating an officer, with sentences of 30 and 39 years respectively. The court rejected their numerous arguments on appeal.

EMCO Corp. v. Armor Machine & Mfg. Ltd. - Contract Dispute

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a non-precedential opinion in the case of EMCO Corp. v. Armor Machine & Mfg. Ltd. The court addressed a contract dispute concerning the purchase of a custom machine, focusing on delivery delays and contract cancellation. The ruling affirmed the district court's findings.