United States — March 10, 2026

Oklahoma Supreme Court Grants Writ of Prohibition in Chick-fil-A Case

The Oklahoma Supreme Court granted a writ of prohibition in the case of Chick-fil-A, Inc. v. The Honorable Richard Ogden. The court found that the trial court abused its discretion in a discovery order related to a wrongful death lawsuit stemming from a fatal accident in a Chick-fil-A drive-through lane.

Kuigoua v. Sacks - Appeal of Order Denying Motion to Set Aside Dismissal

The California Court of Appeal affirmed an order denying a motion to set aside the dismissal of a case. The appellant alleged extrinsic fraud and lack of attorney authority regarding a settlement and dismissal filed by his previous attorney.

In re N.V. - Juvenile Dependency Case Reversal

The California Court of Appeal reversed a juvenile dependency court's jurisdictional order in the case of In re N.V. The court found that the jurisdictional order, based on a domestic violence incident where the mother was briefly arrested but not charged, was not supported by substantial evidence. The opinion is non-precedential.

People v. Rodriguez - Criminal Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Six, affirmed the judgment against Crystal Cortes Rodriguez. The defendant pleaded guilty to felony and misdemeanor charges related to theft, identity theft, forgery, and battery. The court found no arguable issues on appeal.

People v. Burgos - Appeal of Postconviction Order Denial

The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, issued a non-precedential opinion in People v. Burgos on March 10, 2026. The court dismissed the defendant's appeal of a postconviction order denying his request for resentencing.

People v. Y.D. - Juvenile Burglary Appeal

The California Court of Appeal reversed a juvenile court's dispositional order in People v. Y.D. The court found that the juvenile court failed to demonstrate discretion in designating the offense as a felony and that a probation condition was impermissibly broad. The matter is remanded for reconsideration.

Marriage of C.C. and V.Z. - Domestic Violence Restraining Order Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two, affirmed a lower court's decision to issue a one-year domestic violence restraining order (DVRO) against V.Z. The appeal concerned V.Z.'s alleged controlling behavior regarding her son's medication and her repeated calls to CPS and police.

Shariapanahi v. City of Los Angeles - Negligence and Dangerous Condition

The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, affirmed a lower court's judgment in favor of the City of Los Angeles in a case involving a pedestrian accident. The court found no triable issues of material fact regarding the City's liability for design immunity, duty to light a crosswalk, or failure to warn of a dangerous condition.

Lahar v. Jaiswal - Malicious Prosecution Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division Three, affirmed a lower court's denial of anti-SLAPP motions in the case of Lahar v. Jaiswal. The court also denied a motion for sanctions.

Belman v. Los Bagres Corp. - Wrongful Termination Appeal

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a judgment against Los Bagres Corporation and Juan Erasmo Garcia for wrongful termination of an employee. The court found no reversible error in the jury's verdict or the trial proceedings, upholding the lower court's decision.

In re Isabella L. - Juvenile Court Law Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Seven, dismissed an appeal in the case of In re Isabella L. The appeal concerned juvenile court jurisdiction findings related to child endangerment due to parental substance abuse. The court dismissed the appeal as moot because the juvenile court had terminated its jurisdiction while the appeal was pending.

Conservatorship of Krueger - Appeal of Attorney Fee Award

The California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two, reversed an order awarding attorney fees in the Conservatorship of Elizabeth Krueger. The court found the probate court abused its discretion by awarding fees for work performed in a separate civil proceeding, which was not authorized by statute for appointed counsel.

NG Solutions v. Durian - Statute of Limitations Dispute

The California Court of Appeal filed an opinion in NG Solutions v. Durian concerning a dispute over the statute of limitations for a commercial loan and personal guaranty. The court affirmed the judgment, finding the lawsuit was not barred even under the shorter limitations period.

People v. Valencia - California Court of Appeal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a conviction for murder and other felonies in People v. Valencia. The court held that exigent circumstances justified the warrantless entry into the defendant's apartment and that police did not need to seek a warrant once inside. The court also ordered sentencing errors to be corrected on remand.

In re L.G. - Juvenile Dependency Case

The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, affirmed a juvenile court's order declaring L.G. a dependent of the court and removing him from his father's custody. The court found the father's abusive conduct justified the intervention to protect the child.

Stout v. Stout - Family Law Appeal

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a family court order requiring Andrew Stout to pay his former spouse, Julie Stout, $200,000 in attorney fees and an additional $125,000 in sanctions. The court found no abuse of discretion in the awards.

In re D.M. - Termination of Parental Rights Appeal

The California Court of Appeal conditionally reversed an order terminating parental rights in the case of In re D.M. The court found that the Department of Public Social Services failed to comply with the Indian Child Welfare Act, as conceded by the department. The case is remanded for further proceedings.

State of Maine v. Kenneth Rhoades - OUI Conviction Appeal

The Maine Supreme Judicial Court affirmed a conviction for operating under the influence (OUI) with prior offenses. The appeal challenged the denial of motions to suppress evidence and for discovery sanctions. The court found no error in the trial court's rulings.

State v. Sean Eori - Conviction and Appeal of Sexual Offenses

The Maine Supreme Judicial Court affirmed a conviction for unlawful sexual contact and possession of sexually explicit material. The appeal addressed the trial court's issuance of a protective order and the admissibility of photographic evidence.

Shark Tank Strategies v. Town of Scarborough - Zoning Ordinance Pending Status

The Maine Supreme Judicial Court affirmed a lower court's decision, ruling that cannabis cultivation facility applications were not 'pending' when a zoning ordinance amendment was enacted. This decision impacts the interpretation of application status in relation to zoning changes for cannabis businesses in Scarborough.

State v. Joshua Martin - Conviction Judgment Affirmed

The Maine Supreme Judicial Court affirmed the conviction judgment of Joshua Martin, upholding the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence and its forfeiture order. The charges stemmed from a 2022 encounter involving alleged drug trafficking and possession.

CT Dept of Banking Administrative Orders Added

The Connecticut Department of Banking has added new administrative orders for Milner Legal Services and Buyers Holdings, LLC. These orders, dated February 25 and February 26 respectively, detail enforcement actions taken by the department against these entities.

DEA Finalizes Control of Propionyl Chloride as List I Chemical

The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) is finalizing its control of propionyl chloride as a List I chemical under the Controlled Substances Act. This rule subjects handlers of propionyl chloride to chemical regulatory provisions, impacting its use in illicit fentanyl manufacturing. The rule becomes effective on April 9, 2026.

Father Appeals Termination of Parental Rights - Case 24-697

The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals is reviewing a father's appeal of the termination of his parental rights. The court has issued a memorandum decision vacating the lower court's order and remanding the case for further proceedings, citing potential issues with the dispositional hearing process.

CPUC Permitting Speeds Substation Construction

The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) announced that its efficient permitting process allowed LS Power Grid California to begin construction of the Manning Substation in Fresno County ahead of schedule. The CPUC approved the project's permit in September 2025, facilitating the delivery of renewable energy and strengthening grid reliability.

37 Missing Children Found, 7 Suspects Arrested in Riverside County Operation

California Attorney General and Governor announced the recovery of 37 missing children and the arrest of 7 suspects in Riverside County as part of Operation Safe Return. The operation, a collaboration between state and federal agencies, focused on high-risk missing children.

California AG Arrests Man for Illegal Firearms Possession

California Attorney General Bonta announced the arrest of a man in Rancho Cordova for possessing illegal firearms, including a rocket launcher. The seizure included a shotgun, two pistols, a machine gun pistol, and an inert rocket launcher. The suspect faces charges including felon in possession of firearms, possession of a machine gun, and child cruelty.

Melick v. Melick - Post-Judgment Matrimonial Matter

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed a Family Division order enforcing a 1997 Final Judgment of Divorce regarding the division of a 401K plan. The defendant appealed the enforcement of a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) concerning his retirement assets, which had been rolled over into an IRA in 2010.

State of New Jersey v. Joshua Simmons - Appellate Division Opinion

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division vacated orders compelling the production of a crime victim's mental health records. The court found the lower court abused its discretion by not notifying the victim and by making findings without reviewing the records. The case involves multiple indictments against Joshua Simmons.

Edariel Melendez v. New Jersey Dept. of Corrections - Legal Opinion

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed a final administrative decision upholding a disciplinary finding against inmate Edariel Melendez for possession of a SIM card and a cell phone. The court found no basis to overturn the Department of Corrections' decision.

In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of E.K. - Civil Commitment Case Opinion

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division dismissed an appeal concerning the civil commitment of E.K. as moot because the individual had been discharged. The court noted that while E.K. was initially committed due to psychiatric issues, his condition had improved, leading to discharge plans.

Mar Acquisition Group LLC v Maurice Oparaji - Legal Opinion

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed a lower court's decision denying a motion to vacate prior orders related to the specific performance of two real estate contracts. The case involves the sale of two properties in Newark.

New Jersey v. Christian R. Deloach - Non-Precedential Opinion

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division issued a non-precedential opinion affirming the denial of a motion for a new trial for Christian R. Deloach. The decision relates to a motion based on newly discovered evidence following previous convictions.

A.T. v. Arthur Montgomery - Lead Poisoning Case

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed a lower court's decision granting summary judgment to a landlord in a lead poisoning case. The court found that the plaintiff's claims were dismissed due to insufficient evidence and procedural issues.

State of New Jersey v. Johnny Santiago - Criminal Procedure

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed an order suppressing a defendant's recorded statement, finding his waiver of Miranda rights was not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. The court's decision is non-precedential and applies only to the parties involved.

Toorak Capital Partners LLC v. Hanoch Dov Feldman - Court Opinion

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division reversed a lower court's decision to enter default judgment against defendants in a case involving alleged violations of the Uniform Voidable Transactions Act. The court found that the trial court improperly entered default judgment and remanded the case for further proceedings.

Honeywell International Inc. v. Satec Inc. - Environmental Remediation Dispute

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division reviewed a dispute between Honeywell International Inc. and Satec Inc. concerning environmental remediation obligations under a 2009 Settlement Agreement. The court affirmed, with modifications, an order that denied Satec's motion to compel arbitration for certain claims while also addressing Honeywell's cross-appeal regarding access and remediation.

Mar-Can Transport vs Pension Fund - ERISA Withdrawal Liability

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court ruling, directing the Local 854 Pension Fund to reduce Mar-Can Transportation Company's withdrawal liability by $1.8 million. The decision clarifies the interpretation of an ERISA provision concerning the transfer of assets and liabilities when an employer switches multiemployer pension plans.

US v. Cardenas - Cocaine Import Conspiracy Appeal

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the conviction of Jey James Roldan Cardenas for conspiracy to import cocaine. The court found that the district court erred in excluding evidence relevant to Cardenas's defense of lacking criminal intent, remanding the case for further proceedings.

United States v. Aryeetey - Conviction Appeal Affirmation

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction and sentence of Ivanjoel Aryeetey for being a felon in possession of a firearm. The court found no abuse of discretion in the admission of DNA evidence and deemed the sentence substantively reasonable.

Matusak v. Daminski - Excessive Force and Qualified Immunity Appeal

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision granting qualified immunity to two Monroe County Sheriff's Office deputies. The court found that while the jury determined excessive force was used, the officers' belief that the suspect posed a threat was objectively reasonable, and no clearly established law prohibited their actions.

Reidy Contracting Group v. Mt. Hawley Insurance - Additional Insured Status

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision, holding that Reidy Contracting Group was an additional insured under Mt. Hawley Insurance Company's policy. The court found that the Employers Liability Exclusion was ambiguous and must be construed against Mt. Hawley.

SBK ART LLC v. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP - Discovery for Foreign Litigation

The Second Circuit affirmed a District Court order granting SBK ART LLC's petition for discovery under 28 U.S.C. §1782 in aid of foreign litigation. The court held that the law firm Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP must produce documents and testimony for use in European proceedings, disagreeing with the firm's argument that such discovery should be limited to what is discoverable from their client abroad.

B.B. v. Hochul - Due Process Rights in Foster Care

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed in part and affirmed in part a district court's decision in B.B. v. Hochul. The court found that plaintiffs, minors in foster care, have standing to sue New York over its certification scheme for foster parents, which they allege violates their due process rights. The case is remanded for further proceedings.

US v Jimenez - Ammunition Possession Conviction Affirmed

The Second Circuit affirmed a district court's judgment against William Jimenez, who pleaded guilty to possessing ammunition after a felony conviction. The court upheld the special conditions of supervised release, including electronic device searches and mental health counseling, and affirmed the 105-month sentence.

Safdieh v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue - Tax Penalties

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Commissioner of Internal Revenue can assess penalties for failing to report control of a foreign business under I.R.C. § 6038(b). The court vacated a Tax Court order that had granted summary judgment to the taxpayer, Joseph Safdieh, and remanded the case for further proceedings.

Kellogg v. Nichols - Concealed Carry License Case

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of a lawsuit challenging New York's concealed carry license laws. The court held that state judges reviewing license applications are protected by absolute judicial immunity and that federal courts lack jurisdiction over such claims under Article III's case-or-controversy requirement.

Peña Garcia v. Department of Labor - Workers' Compensation

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals denied a petition for review in Peña Garcia v. Department of Labor. The court affirmed the denial of reimbursement for medical cannabis-infused edibles under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act, citing federal law classifying marijuana as a Schedule I substance.

Miller v. Lamanna - Appeal of Dismissal

The Second Circuit vacated a district court's dismissal of a former corrections officer's discrimination and retaliation claims. The appellate court found the district court erred by converting a summary judgment motion into a Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal, considering only the complaint's allegations despite extensive discovery. The case is remanded for further proceedings.

Care One LLC v NLRB - Unfair Labor Practice Proceedings

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's denial of a preliminary injunction sought by Care One LLC and affiliated healthcare facilities. The facilities sought to halt NLRB proceedings, arguing the ALJ's appointment was invalid due to a lack of quorum. The court found the plaintiffs could not demonstrate irreparable harm.

Bugliotti v. Republic of Argentina - Sovereign Bond Dispute

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals partially affirmed and partially vacated a district court's dismissal of a bondholder suit against the Republic of Argentina. The court found that some of the bondholders' claims are timely under New York's COVID-era tolling provisions and that they now have authority under Argentine law to sue on defaulted sovereign bonds.

United States v. Woods - Competency to Stand Trial

The Second Circuit affirmed a district court's order extending a defendant's hospitalization beyond the initial four-month period while the government decided whether to seek civil commitment. The court addressed challenges to the order's mootness and the district court's authority to prolong hospitalization.

Connecticut Fair Housing Center v. CoreLogic Rental Property Solutions - Fair Housing Act

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on a case involving the Connecticut Fair Housing Center and CoreLogic Rental Property Solutions. The court vacated in part, affirmed in part, and reversed in part the lower court's decision regarding claims under the Fair Housing Act and Fair Credit Reporting Act.

GEICO v. Mayzenberg - Insurance Reimbursement Dispute

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a district court judgment in favor of GEICO in GEICO v. Mayzenberg. The court remanded the case after the New York Court of Appeals clarified that an insurer cannot deny no-fault benefits based solely on alleged professional misconduct that does not involve ceding control of a professional services corporation to an unlicensed party.

Broadcast Music, Inc. v. North American Concert Promoters Association - Antitrust

The Second Circuit vacated a district court's decision regarding music licensing fees set by Broadcast Music, Inc. (BMI) for concert promoters. The court found the imposed rates and expanded definition of gross revenues to be unreasonable and remanded the case for further proceedings.

Golden Mile Associates v. Com. of PA, DOT - Appeal of Municipality of Monroeville

The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania issued an opinion in Golden Mile Associates v. Com. of PA, DOT, concerning an appeal by the Municipality of Monroeville regarding governmental immunity. The court quashed the appeal as the trial court's interlocutory order was not appealable.

A.D. Butler v. The Philadelphia Parking Authority - Court Opinion

The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania issued a non-precedential opinion affirming a lower court's decision in the case of A.D. Butler v. The Philadelphia Parking Authority. The case involved the impoundment and sale of a vehicle due to delinquent parking tickets.

Davis v. Commonwealth of Virginia - Aggravated Malicious Wounding Conviction

The Court of Appeals of Virginia affirmed a trial court's conviction of Igal Vondale Davis for aggravated malicious wounding. The court found sufficient evidence to prove malice and uphold the conviction, sentencing Davis to 20 years with 12 suspended.

Heber Otoniel Luna Contreras v. Commonwealth of Virginia - Judgment Affirmation

The Court of Appeals of Virginia affirmed a judgment in the case of Heber Otoniel Luna Contreras v. Commonwealth of Virginia. The court found that the trial court did not err in denying a motion to dismiss the felony murder charge, and that principles of comity limit challenges to extradition decisions.

Cobbs v. Virginia - Judgment Affirmed

The Court of Appeals of Virginia affirmed the conviction of Simon Dewitt Cobbs for abduction, assault and battery, and violations of a protective order. The court found sufficient evidence presented at trial to support the jury's verdict.

Sharpe v. Virginia - Judgment Affirmed

The Court of Appeals of Virginia affirmed the trial court's judgment against John Michael Sharpe, who was convicted of 20 counts of soliciting child pornography. The appellate court found no abuse of discretion in admitting testimony of prior bad acts, limiting jury instructions, or denying a motion for a new trial due to juror misconduct.

BH Mid-Atlantic Pools v. Dodd - Judgment Affirmation

The Court of Appeals of Virginia affirmed a trial court's judgment in favor of Lisa Dodd against BH Mid-Atlantic Inc. (Blue Haven Pools). The court found no error in the trial court's findings regarding causation, damages, jury instructions, and motions to strike.

Andrew Condlin v. John J. Shaia - Defamation Verdict Reversed

The Court of Appeals of Virginia reversed a trial court's denial of a motion to set aside a verdict and order a new trial in the defamation case of Andrew Condlin v. John J. Shaia. The court found errors in allowing amendments under the relation-back doctrine and considering time-barred statements, leading to the reversal of the judgment and remand.

St. John v. St. John - Property Valuation Dispute

The Court of Appeals of Virginia upheld a trial court's decision confirming a special commissioner's report that valued a property at $500,000. The court ordered the sale of the property to the majority owners, finding no error in the valuation or the sale order.

Romagna v. Commonwealth of Virginia - Child Abuse Conviction Affirmed

The Court of Appeals of Virginia affirmed the felony child abuse convictions of Gabrielle Nadine Romagna. The court found sufficient evidence that Romagna willfully omitted necessary care for her two minor children, resulting in serious injuries including chemical burns and infections.

Regina Lynn Dickenson v. Commonwealth of Virginia - Sentencing Abuse of Discretion

The Virginia Court of Appeals ruled that the trial court abused its discretion in sentencing Regina Lynn Dickenson. The court found that the trial court misinterpreted Code § 19.2-306.1(A) by treating separate convictions as a single conviction when counting technical probation violations, leading to an improper sentence.

William V. Davis v. Judith Christy - Judgment Affirmed

The Court of Appeals of Virginia affirmed a trial court's judgment in William V. Davis v. Judith Christy. The court found no abuse of discretion in the trial court's handling of spoliation of evidence and affirmed the compensatory damages award.

N. v. United States of America - Civil Rights Case

A new civil case, N. v. United States of America, has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, identified by docket number 4:26-cv-02036, involves a claim related to Civil Rights against the United States and the Federal Bureau of Prisons.

Com. v. Rose, R. - Criminal Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a non-precedential decision in the case of Commonwealth v. Rose, R. The court affirmed the judgment of sentence for Richard Wayne Rose Jr. following his conviction of endangering the welfare of children and simple assault.

Com. v. Simmons - Criminal Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a non-precedential opinion affirming the judgment of sentence for Dawann Martric Simmons. The case involved a fatal traffic accident where the appellant was charged with multiple offenses including Homicide by Vehicle.

Com. v. Washington, K. - Criminal Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court reversed a DUI conviction for Keith Washington due to insufficient evidence presented by the Commonwealth. The court vacated the judgment of sentence and remanded for resentencing. The appeal was filed under docket number 515 WDA 2025.

Com. v. Morton, D. - Endangering Welfare of Children

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania affirmed the judgment of sentence for Deionne Morton, who pleaded guilty to endangering the welfare of children. The case involved deplorable living conditions found by child welfare caseworkers.

Com. v. Roman, J. - Non-Precedential Court Opinion

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued a non-precedential decision in the case of Commonwealth v. Roman, J. The court affirmed the judgment of sentence for Javion Dwayne Roman, who was convicted of first-degree murder and related firearms offenses.

Com. v. Grivner, M., Sr. - Criminal Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a non-precedential decision in the case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Michael James Grivner, Sr. The court affirmed the sentence of six months of probation and fines imposed following convictions for simple assault, harassment, and disorderly conduct.

Com. v. Rainier, H. - Pennsylvania Superior Court Non-Precedential Decision

The Pennsylvania Superior Court reversed a trial court's order suppressing evidence in the case of Commonwealth v. Rainier, H. The court found that law enforcement had reasonable suspicion to conduct an investigative detention. The case is remanded for further proceedings.

In Re: C. Ruggere, Dec'd - Non-Precedential Opinion

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued a non-precedential decision in the case of In Re: C. Ruggere, Dec'd. The court affirmed the lower court's decree dismissing an appeal concerning the validity of the decedent's last will and testament, which was challenged on grounds of undue influence.

Haldeman v. Haldeman - Civil Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a non-precedential decision in Haldeman v. Haldeman, affirming a lower court's judgment regarding property eviction and the existence of a sale agreement. The case involved a dispute over monthly payments and whether they constituted rent or payments towards a property purchase after a sheriff's sale.

Com. v. Berry, A. - Criminal Sentencing Appeal

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued a non-precedential decision in the case of Commonwealth v. Berry. The court affirmed the judgment of sentence for Andrew Milton Berry, who appealed the discretionary aspects of his sentence for burglary and aggravated assault.

Wells Fargo v. Bennett - Mortgage Foreclosure Appeal

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued a non-precedential decision in Wells Fargo v. Bennett, affirming a lower court's order regarding a mortgage foreclosure action. The appeal was brought by Jerry and Crystal Tuttle concerning a property previously owned by Tina Bennett and Gary L. Bennett.

Com. v. Ogrosky, J. - Criminal Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a non-precedential decision in the case of Commonwealth v. Jeremy Ogrosky. The court affirmed the lower court's order denying the appellant's petition for post-conviction relief, addressing claims of ineffective trial counsel.

Com. v. Reese, L. - Non-Precedential Court Opinion

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania affirmed the dismissal of Louis Van Reese's serial Post-Conviction Relief Act (PCRA) petition. The court found that Reese did not meet a timeliness exception for his claims regarding his 2004 conviction for criminal attempt to commit homicide and aggravated assault.

Belogolovsky v. Gitter - Non-Precedential Court Opinion

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued a non-precedential decision in Belogolovsky v. Gitter, affirming a lower court's order to terminate child support. The case involved a dispute over child support obligations following a custody battle.

Com. v. Brown, I. - Criminal Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a non-precedential opinion affirming the judgment of sentence for Isaiah J. Brown. The appeal challenged the trial court's handling of a Batson challenge during jury selection.

Hartford Man Sentenced for Fraudulently Collecting Benefits

Ricardo Santiago was sentenced to 57 months in prison for fraudulently collecting over $316,000 in Social Security benefits, over $36,000 in unemployment benefits, and over $18,000 in food stamp benefits. He was also ordered to pay $371,686 in restitution.

Colorado Court Denies Motion for Reconsideration

The District Court of Colorado denied a motion for reconsideration filed by plaintiff Mykhael Kuciapinski in civil action 1:24-cv-02181. The court cited Westfall certification law in its decision, denying the plaintiff's request for clarification and reconsideration of prior orders.

Ronald J. Desrochers v. Consumer Legal Group, P.C. - Default Judgment

The District of Colorado entered a default judgment against Consumer Legal Group, P.C. in the case of Ronald J. Desrochers v. Consumer Legal Group, P.C. The judgment follows allegations that the defendant misrepresented its debt resolution services and failed to apply client payments as agreed.

Mathews v. Elite Nurses Management LLC - Class Action Settlement

The U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado granted preliminary approval for a class action settlement in Mathews v. Elite Nurses Management LLC. The case involves allegations of unpaid overtime wages for hourly employees. The court also approved the unopposed motion for attorney fees.

USITC Institutes Section 337 Investigation of Vehicle Parts

The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has instituted a Section 337 investigation based on a complaint by General Motors LLC and GM Global Technology Operations LLC. The investigation concerns alleged infringement of patents related to certain vehicle parts and components thereof.

State v. Roehrenbeck - Ohio Court of Appeals Opinion

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision regarding the application of R.C. Chapter 2950 to the defendant. The case involved the transmission and possession of child sexual abuse material, with evidence originating from tips by the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children and Instagram.

State v. Jordan - Criminal Law Opinion

The Ohio Court of Appeals dismissed an appeal in State v. Jordan due to a lack of a final, appealable order. The case involved charges of having weapons under disability, possession of cocaine, and other offenses. The court's decision means the original trial court's judgment is not yet subject to appeal.

State v. Ickes - OVI Felony Plea Appeal

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court's judgment in State v. Ickes. The defendant appealed his felony OVI convictions, arguing his no contest plea was not knowingly entered. The court found the plea was valid and upheld the convictions.

State v. Johnson - Criminal Defendant Barred from Merging Offenses Argument

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's decision denying a criminal defendant's motion for resentencing. The court held that the defendant is barred by claim preclusion from arguing that his offenses should have been merged at sentencing, as this argument was not raised on direct appeal.

State ex rel. Zoldan v. Giulitto - Procedendo Action

The Ohio Court of Appeals dismissed a procedendo action filed by Ron J. Zoldan against Judge Paula C. Giulitto. The court granted the respondent's motion to dismiss, finding the action moot because the judge had already ruled on the motions that were the subject of the procedendo request.

Plalan Lake Rd. Maintenance, Inc. v. Fabian - Enforcement of Settlement Agreement

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision enforcing a settlement agreement in the case of Plalan Lake Rd. Maintenance, Inc. v. Fabian. The dispute involved the rightful board of trustees for a non-profit road maintenance corporation.

State v. Appenzeller - Postconviction Relief

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision denying a motion to vacate convictions. The defendant argued the State of Ohio lacked personal jurisdiction due to how parties were listed on court forms. The court found the claim meritless and barred by res judicata.

State v. Patton - Criminal Law Guilty Plea Waiver Opinion

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's judgment sentencing Jack Wesley Patton, Jr. to an eight to twelve-year prison sentence following his guilty pleas to charges including Felonious Assault and Aggravated Possession of Drugs. The court found the pleas to be knowing, intelligent, and voluntary.

State v. Norman - Felonious Assault and Weapons Charges Appeal

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Damien Lujuane Norman for felonious assault with a firearm specification and having weapons while under disability. The court found sufficient evidence to support the convictions and rejected claims of ineffective assistance of counsel and other procedural errors.

Weese v. Dalton - Foreclosure Case Affirmed

The Ohio Court of Appeals granted reconsideration in Weese v. Dalton, affirming a trial court's judgment in a foreclosure case. The court found that the homeowner's statutory exemption exceeded the judgment creditor's lien, impacting the attachment of the lien to the property.

State v. Little - Jail-Time Credit Abuse Discretion

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's denial of additional jail-time credit for defendant Angel Little. The court found that the trial court appropriately calculated the credit, applying it once to the aggregate sentence for consecutive sentences as per R.C. 2967.191.

Hahn v. Farmakis-King - Ohio Court Opinion

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision in Hahn v. Farmakis-King, dismissing claims related to a promissory note and mortgage. The court's opinion addresses issues of spousal debt, contract integration, and attorney-client privilege.

State v. Bishop - Criminal Law Guilty Plea Misdemeanors

The Ohio Court of Appeals reversed and remanded a criminal case against Diana Rachelle Bishop. The court found that the trial court failed to properly inform the defendant of the effect of her guilty plea, a violation of Ohio Criminal Rule 11(E). The conviction and plea were vacated.

State v. Crislip - Criminal Law Case

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed the Trumbull County Court of Common Pleas' sentencing of Ashley Crislip to 36 months in prison. Crislip pleaded guilty to amended charges including trafficking in cocaine and fentanyl-related compounds. The court found sufficient evidence for the convictions and that the sentence was not contrary to law.

State v. Wall - Idaho Court of Appeals Opinion

The Idaho Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's order denying Robroy Wall, Jr.'s motion to correct an illegal sentence. The appeal concerned the concurrent versus consecutive application of a firearm enhancement to a first-degree murder sentence.

State v. Robert Lee Daniels - Criminal Appeal

The Wisconsin Court of Appeals has released an opinion in the criminal case State v. Robert Lee Daniels, case number 2024AP001801-CR. The opinion is dated March 10, 2026, and is available in PDF format.

Harvey Bartsch, Jr. v. Randy Frokjer - Court Opinion

The Wisconsin Court of Appeals has released an opinion in the case of Harvey Bartsch, Jr. v. Randy Frokjer, docket number 2024AP001425. The opinion is dated March 10, 2026, and is available in PDF format.

State v. Jamon W. Washington - Criminal Appeal

The Wisconsin Court of Appeals has released an electronic PDF opinion for the criminal case State v. Jamon W. Washington, docket number 2024AP001369-CR. The opinion was released on March 10, 2026, and is available for download.

State v. Shawn Davis Schulpius - Court of Appeals Opinion

The Wisconsin Court of Appeals has released an opinion in the case of State v. Shawn Davis Schulpius, docket number 2023AP002154. The opinion is dated March 10, 2026, and is available in PDF format.

Harry M. Wirth v. Mart W. Swenson - Civil Appeal

The Wisconsin Court of Appeals has released an opinion in the case of Harry M. Wirth v. Mart W. Swenson, docket number 2022AP001186. The opinion is available in PDF format and will be published in the official reports.

B & E 53207 Corporation v. City of Milwaukee Board of Review - Tax Appeal

The Wisconsin Court of Appeals has released an opinion in the case of B & E 53207 Corporation v. City of Milwaukee Board of Review, docket number 2024AP001325. The opinion is dated March 10, 2026, and is available in PDF format.

David M. Fredrich v. Farmers Group Property & Casualty Ins. Co. - Appeals Court Opinion

The Wisconsin Court of Appeals has released a recommended for publication opinion in the case of David M. Fredrich v. Farmers Group Property & Casualty Ins. Co. The opinion is dated March 10, 2026, and is available for download in PDF format.

Hernandez Ramirez v. Voyager Indemnity Insurance Company - Court Opinion

The Wisconsin Court of Appeals has released a recommended for publication opinion in the case of Lizbeth Hernandez Ramirez v. Voyager Indemnity Insurance Company, docket number 2024AP000786. The opinion is dated March 10, 2026.

Bentley v. Sandhills Aviation - Breach of Contract and Fraud Appeal

The Nebraska Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's judgment against Sandhills Aviation, LLC, and others, holding them jointly and severally liable for $2,462,882.78 for breach of contract, fraud, and breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The court also denied the appellants' counterclaims.

John Chacho, Jr. v. Cara Lister - Family Law Appeal

The Connecticut Appellate Court dismissed an appeal in John Chacho, Jr. v. Cara Lister, finding the case moot due to subsequent custody orders. The court clarified that the 'officially released' date of an opinion governs all post-opinion motion and certification filing periods.

Ligeri v. White RoadCapital, LLC - Appeal of Dismissal

The Connecticut Appellate Court partially reversed a lower court's dismissal of a case brought by Benjamin Ligeri against White RoadCapital, LLC, and others. The appellate court found that the trial court improperly dismissed counts related to tortious interference and unfair trade practices, allowing those claims to proceed.

NORTHEASTERN CONNECTICUT COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS ANIMAL SERVICES v. DONOVAN - Animal Welfare Proceeding

The Connecticut Appellate Court released an opinion in an animal welfare case, clarifying that the exclusionary rule does not apply to proceedings under statute § 22-329a. The court affirmed the trial court's denial of a motion to suppress evidence related to neglected animals, citing the societal interest in addressing animal cruelty.

Louis Martinoli v. Stamford Police Department - Workers' Compensation Appeal

The Connecticut Appellate Court issued an opinion in Louis Martinoli v. Stamford Police Department, addressing the calculation of temporary total disability benefits. The court affirmed the Compensation Review Board's decision, clarifying that compensation rates must be based on the date of incapacity, not a prior date of injury, when there is a gap between the two.

The Lee Memorial Methodist Church of Norwich v. City of Norwich - Tax Exemption Appeal

The Connecticut Appellate Court ruled that a religious organization is entitled to a tax exemption for property leased to a for-profit daycare facility under statute § 12-81 (14). The court held that the statute does not require the religious organization to be affiliated with or operate the daycare facility.

NIST Report: Experimental Setup for Automated Vehicle Passenger Comfort Evaluation

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has published a technical report detailing an experimental framework for evaluating passenger comfort in automated vehicles during braking. The report, NISTIR 8612, outlines a standardized test plan for assessing deceleration profiles and ride quality.

Evedesign: Accessible Biosequence Design Framework

NIST has published guidance on 'Evedesign,' a new open-source framework for biosequence design. The framework aims to make machine learning methods for protein engineering more accessible and interoperable for researchers, with an interactive web interface available.

US v. Concepcion - Cocaine Possession Intent to Distribute Ruling

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed a conviction for possession with intent to distribute cocaine. The court ruled that the district court did not err in refusing to instruct the jury on the lesser-included offense of simple possession, finding no rational jury could dispute the intent to distribute.

MassDEP Fines Hunter Plastics $23,000 for Hazardous Waste Violations

The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) has fined Hunter Plastics, Inc. $23,000 for hazardous waste violations, including illegal transportation and improper storage and labeling. The company has agreed to pay the penalty and correct the violations.

MassDEP Fines Toby Realty Trust $31,000 for Cleanup Violations

The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) has fined Toby Realty Trust $31,000 for violating oil and hazardous materials cleanup regulations. The penalty was issued with a Unilateral Administrative Order requiring the trust to comply with a new schedule for cleanup actions at a Springfield property.

Bernal Moving LLC Household Goods Permit Application

The Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission (UTC) has received a new household goods permit application from Bernal Moving & Delivery Service LLC. The application is currently pending review.

Pro Movers LLC - Insurance Action

The Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission (UTC) has initiated an insurance action against Pro Movers LLC (DBA Groovin Movin). The filing type is listed as 'Insurance Action' with a summary indicating a cancellation of permit for insurance. The case is currently pending.

Pacific Peak Solutions LLC charter certificate cancelled

Pacific Peak Solutions LLC charter certificate cancelled

Horace Cowan v. New Jersey Parole Board - Court Opinion

The Supreme Court of New Jersey ruled that the State Parole Board acted arbitrarily and capriciously in setting a 200-month future eligibility term (FET) for inmate Horace Cowan, significantly exceeding the presumptive 27-month term. The Court established a new standard for imposing extended FETs.

State of Tennessee v. Michael Sneed - Criminal Appeal

The Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the trial court's judgment denying alternative sentencing for Michael Sneed, who was convicted of two counts of selling methamphetamine. The court upheld the sixteen-year sentence imposed by the trial court.

Robert S. Walton IV v. Deepa B. Walton - Marriage Dissolution Appeal

The Connecticut Supreme Court dismissed an appeal in the case of Robert S. Walton IV v. Deepa B. Walton. The court clarified that the certified question did not accurately reflect the basis on which the Appellate Court decided the issue regarding the disclosure of a marital residence appraisal.

People of Michigan v. George Stephen Cunningham - Criminal Appeal

The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's judgment against George Stephen Cunningham, who was convicted of multiple felonies including first-degree child abuse and armed robbery. The appellate court found no errors in the trial court's proceedings or jurisdiction.

People v. Watson - Criminal Appeal

The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's judgment in the case of People v. Watson. The defendant appealed his 2011 conviction for first-degree murder and related charges, but the appellate court upheld the original verdict and sentence.

BMFC v. MSC - Affirmation of Lower Court Judgment

The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's denial of a personal protection order (PPO) petition. The appellate court found no error in the trial court's decision to deny the PPO, both on an ex parte basis and after a hearing.

Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hosp v. Progressive Michigan Ins Co - Insurance Dispute

The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's judgment in a dispute between Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital and Progressive Michigan Insurance Company. The court affirmed the judgment of $49,215.03 but did not award attorney fees to the hospital.

People v. Robbie Deshawn Taylor - Criminal Appeal

The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's denial of a motion for relief from judgment for Robbie Deshawn Taylor, who was convicted of first-degree premeditated murder and assault with intent to commit murder. The decision stems from a collateral review of the case following a second jury trial.

People of Michigan v. Lanisha Sharita Williams - Criminal Conviction Appeal

The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's judgment against Lanisha Sharita Williams. The defendant was convicted of kidnapping, extortion, and unlawful imprisonment. The appellate court found no reversible error in the trial proceedings.

People of Michigan v. Benjamin David Stoll - Criminal Appeal

The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's judgment and sentence for Benjamin David Stoll, who was convicted of assault with intent to do great bodily harm less than murder. The court found no merit in the defendant's claims of instructional and scoring errors.

People of Michigan v. Steven Russell Brcic - Criminal Convictions and Sentencing Appeal

The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions of Steven Russell Brcic for prisoner in possession of a weapon and operating while intoxicated. However, the court vacated his sentences for both offenses due to disproportionality and remanded the case for resentencing.

People of Michigan v. Jordan Dennis Seegars - Affirmation of Conviction

The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's judgment against Jordan Dennis Seegars, who was convicted of first-degree criminal sexual conduct. The court found no errors in the trial proceedings. This decision upholds the original conviction and sentence.

In Re Johnson Minors - Child Abuse Case Affirmation

The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's dismissal of a child protective petition. The dismissal was based on the Department of Health and Human Services' failure to produce forensic interview recordings of the minor children, which the court found violated discovery rules.

People of Michigan v. Raymond Cristopher Barrios - Criminal Appeal

The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's judgment against Raymond Cristopher Barrios, who was convicted of first-degree murder and other related charges. The appellate court found no errors in the trial court's proceedings and upheld the conviction and sentencing.

In Re lup/nrbt Minors - Parental Rights Termination Affirmed

The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's order terminating a respondent's parental rights to two children. The court found that statutory grounds for termination existed and that termination was in the children's best interests, despite the respondent's arguments to the contrary. The case involved allegations of sexual assault and neglect.

In Re M. A. X. Reed-Moore Minor - Termination of Parental Rights

The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's order terminating a respondent's parental rights to his son, MRM. The termination was based on grounds including prior severe physical abuse of other children and a recent operating while intoxicated conviction. The court found the termination order to be supported by the evidence.

Hein v. Carlson, Daniels - Land Ownership Dispute

The Wyoming Supreme Court affirmed a district court's decision in Hein v. Carlson, Daniels, ruling that the meander line rule applies to conveyances of land south of the North Platte River. The court declared that the Carlsons and Daniels, as appellees, own the disputed land between the meander line and the river's thread.

Marvin Hillman v. State - Case Dismissed

The Georgia Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal of Marvin Hillman in case A26A1285. The dismissal was due to Hillman's failure to follow the required procedural steps for an appeal from an order denying an extraordinary motion for new trial.

Pelayo v. Pelayo - Divorce Case Remanded

The Court of Appeals of Georgia vacated and remanded a divorce case concerning the equitable division of the marital residence. The court found the trial court erred in applying the source of funds rule to the increase in equity due to market forces. The case is remanded with direction for further proceedings.

Transamerica Life Insurance v. Roof Partners - Discretionary Appeal Granted

The Court of Appeals of Georgia granted Transamerica Life Insurance Company's application for discretionary appeal in the case against Roof Partners, LLC. The order directs the Appellant to file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days.

Rashad Williams v. State - Appeal Withdrawn

The Court of Appeals of Georgia has granted the appellant's motion to withdraw their appeal in the case of Rashad Williams v. The State. Jurisdiction has been released back to the trial court.

In Re: Anise Dubois - Medical Consent Ward Case Reversed

The Georgia Court of Appeals reversed a probate court's order appointing the Department of Human Services as the temporary medical consent guardian for Anise Dubois. The appellate court found that the probate court erred in denying the Department's motion to vacate the appointment order.

Georgia Court of Appeals: Application Dismissed

The Georgia Court of Appeals dismissed a discretionary application in the case of Wayland Braxton Willis v. Hon. Sheryl B. Jolly. The application was dismissed as having been improvidently docketed and was re-docketed as a petition for writ of mandamus under a different case number.

Everett B. Slay v. Stacie D. Ross - Modification of Custody and Contempt Case

The Court of Appeals of Georgia affirmed trial court orders in a modification of custody and contempt case. The court also cautioned the appellant's attorney regarding the submission of briefs containing fictitious case citations, potentially due to AI use.

William Doe v. Archdiocese of Atlanta - Affirmed

The Court of Appeals of Georgia affirmed a trial court's decision to grant summary judgment to the Archdiocese of Atlanta and several parishes in a case involving alleged sexual misconduct by former priests. The court found the plaintiffs' claims were barred by the statute of limitations.

Danny Dunn v. Brian MacOn House - Discretionary Application Denied

The Court of Appeals of Georgia denied a discretionary application in the case of Danny Dunn v. Brian MacOn House. The court also fined Dunn $500 for filing frivolous appeals in related cases, directing the trial court to enter the fines as a money judgment.

Piechoczek v. Jones - Case Dismissal

The Court of Appeals of Georgia dismissed the case of Julianna Piechoczek v. Tudor Jones on March 10, 2026. The dismissal was due to the appellant failing to file the notice of appeal within the mandatory 30-day period after the trial court's order.

Irene J. Neeley v. Maren C. Parsell - Case Dismissed

The Court of Appeals of Georgia dismissed the case of Irene J. Neeley v. Maren C. Parsell. The dismissal was based on the appellant filing the notice of appeal beyond the 30-day deadline following the trial court's order.

Jeremy Knowles v. Chelsea Knowles - Discretionary Application Granted

The Georgia Court of Appeals granted Jeremy Knowles' application for discretionary review in the case Jeremy Knowles v. Chelsea Knowles, vacating a previous dismissal order. The court reinstated the application and granted review, directing Knowles to file a notice of appeal within ten days if not already done.

Curtis J. Mooney v. State - Case Dismissed

The Court of Appeals of Georgia dismissed the direct appeal filed by Curtis J. Mooney. The court found it lacked jurisdiction, citing a prior Supreme Court of Georgia ruling and the recent enactment of OCGA § 5-6-39.1, which did not apply to Mooney's situation.

Keisha Thomas v. Marble House Management - Application Dismissed

The Georgia Court of Appeals dismissed Keisha Thomas's application for discretionary appeal against Marble House Management. The court found the application was untimely filed, exceeding the 30-day deadline after the magistrate court's judgment.

Estate of George Edward Samuel case affirmed

The Court of Appeals of Georgia affirmed the disposition in the Estate of George Edward Samuel case. The docket number for this case is A25A1573. No prior citations are known for this ruling.

Transamerica Financial Life Insurance Company v. Roof Partners, LLC - Discretionary Appeal Granted

The Georgia Court of Appeals has granted a discretionary appeal in the case of Transamerica Financial Life Insurance Company v. Roof Partners, LLC. The court's order directs the Clerk of State Court to include a copy of the order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

HHS OIG: Over $15 Million in Improper Medicare Payments for Non-Emergency Services

The HHS Office of Inspector General (OIG) reported that Medicare improperly paid physicians $922,524 and potentially $14.2 million to hospitals for services billed with emergency department procedure codes but rendered at non-emergency sites. The OIG recommends recovery of improper payments and improved claims processing controls.

Center for Biological Diversity v. Public Utilities Commission - Environmental Law

The California Court of Appeal, 1st Appellate District, has issued an opinion in the case Center for Biological Diversity et al. v. Public Utilities Commission of the State of California. The case, with appellate court case number A167721, was filed on May 3, 2023, and involved an environmental law dispute.

Alameda County Taxpayers v. City of Oakland - Case Details

The Alameda County Taxpayers' Association has filed a case against the City of Oakland, identified as case number A171041. The filing date for this case was July 24, 2024, with oral arguments scheduled for February 24, 2026.

Two ISIS supporters charged with attempted explosive devices plot

Two ISIS supporters charged with attempted explosive devices plot

Pennsylvania brothers convicted of racketeering, fraud schemes

Pennsylvania brothers convicted of racketeering, fraud schemes

Education Agency Information Collection Activities under IDEA

The Education Department has published a notice regarding information collection activities for state and local educational agencies under Part B of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). This notice pertains to proposed submissions and approvals for reporting requirements.

Presidential Nominations Sent to Senate

The White House announced that several presidential nominations have been sent to the Senate for confirmation. These nominations include individuals for key positions such as Secretary of Homeland Security, United States Marshals, and Ambassadors to various countries.

U.S. Hostage and Wrongful Detainee Day Proclamation

President Trump has proclaimed March 9, 2026, as U.S. Hostage and Wrongful Detainee Day. The proclamation highlights efforts to secure the release of detained Americans abroad and announces new executive authority to designate countries as State Sponsors of Wrongful Detention.

FAFSA Processing Updates for Pell Grant Eligibility and Workforce Programs

The Department of Education announced system updates effective April 26, 2026, to implement changes from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) regarding Pell Grant eligibility for workforce programs and modified loan limits. These updates affect FAFSA processing systems and the Institutional Student Information Record (ISIR).

TPHA Logistics, LLC - Notice of Apparent Violation and Intent to Assess Forfeiture

The Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO) has issued a Notice of Apparent Violation and Intent to Assess Forfeiture against TPHA Logistics, LLC (Case No. 25-1072-TR-CVF). An evidentiary hearing is scheduled for April 9, 2026, to address the alleged violations.

A. v. Salesforce, Inc. - Civil Case

A new civil case, A. v. Salesforce, Inc., was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on February 20, 2026. The case number is 3:26-cv-01531-LB. Recent filings include a notice of related cases and consent/declination to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge.

State v. Jose Guzman-ambrocio - Criminal Appeal

The Washington State Court of Appeals has issued an opinion in the case of State of Washington v. Jose Guzman-ambrocio. The opinion was filed on March 9, 2026, with docket number 86104-2. This is an appellate decision from the Skagit Superior Court.

State of Washington v. Tyler M. Polanco - Criminal Appeal

The Washington Court of Appeals has filed an opinion in the case of State of Washington v. Tyler M. Polanco. The opinion, filed on March 9, 2026, pertains to an appeal from the Snohomish Superior Court.

State of Washington v. P.n. - Criminal Appeal

The Washington Court of Appeals filed an opinion in the case State of Washington v. P.n. The case originated from Pierce County Superior Court, with Docket Number 23-8-00390-7. The opinion was authored by Judge Cecily Hazelrigg.

Scott Iceberg v. Rita Street, LLC - Civil Appeal

The Washington Court of Appeals has filed an opinion in the case of Scott Iceberg, Appellant v. Rita Street, LLC., Respondent. The opinion was filed on March 9, 2026, under docket number 87837-9. This filing represents a standard procedural step in the judicial process.

Soyege v Uw Medicine - Court of Appeals Opinion

The Washington Court of Appeals filed an opinion in the case of Soyege v Uw Medicine on March 9, 2026. The case involves an appeal from a judgment or order filed on January 31, 2025. This filing represents a new court opinion in an ongoing legal matter.

Jeannene Mitchell v Ywca King Snohomish County Officers - Civil Appeal Opinion

The Washington Court of Appeals Division I has issued an opinion in the case of Jeannene Mitchell v. Ywca King Snohomish County Officers, Et Al. The opinion was filed on March 9, 2026, under docket number 87860-3. This document provides the official court ruling on the appeal.

Washington Court of Appeals Opinion: In The Matter Of The Detention Of M.b.

The Washington Court of Appeals filed an opinion in the case In The Matter Of The Detention Of M.b. on March 9, 2026. The opinion is associated with Docket Number 88002-1. This filing represents a new court decision.

In The Matter Of The Detention Of D.w. - Washington Court of Appeals

The Washington Court of Appeals filed an opinion in the case In The Matter Of The Detention Of D.w. on March 9, 2026. The docket number for this case is 88044-6. This filing represents the court's decision on an appeal.

Tanimura v. Tanimura - Court of Appeals Opinion

The Washington Court of Appeals Division I has filed an opinion in the case of In Re: Toshihide Tanimura, Respondent And Satoko Tanimura, Appellant. The opinion was filed on March 9, 2026, with a docket number of 87760-7. The judgment or order under review was filed on January 24, 2025.

Esther Carr v. Marion Seeklus - Civil Opinion

The Washington Court of Appeals Division I filed an opinion in the case of Esther Carr v. Marion Seeklus Et Al on March 9, 2026. The case originated from the Whatcom County Superior Court, with a file date of April 11, 2025.

Deutsche Bank v. Erickson - Court of Appeals Opinion

The Washington Court of Appeals Division I has issued an opinion in the case of Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Shelley A. Erickson, docket number 87457-8. The opinion was filed on March 9, 2026.

Detention Of F.a. - Court Opinion

The Washington State Court of Appeals has filed an opinion in the case of Detention Of F.a. The opinion was filed on March 9, 2026, and concerns an appeal from Pierce County Superior Court.

Wehnert v Primacio - Court of Appeals Opinion

The Washington Court of Appeals has issued an opinion in the case of Wehnert v Primacio. The opinion was filed on March 9, 2026, under docket number 88012-8. This is a standard publication of a court decision.

Scarimbolo v. King County Department of Local Services - Opinion

The Washington Court of Appeals, Division I, filed an opinion in the case of Dane Scarimbolo v. King County Department of Local Services on March 9, 2026. The case involves a review of a judgment or order filed on March 11, 2025.

Reger v Amazon.com - Court of Appeals Opinion

The Washington Court of Appeals filed an opinion in the case of Reger v. Amazon.com, LLC, with docket number 88074-8. The opinion was authored by Judge Ian Birk and filed on March 9, 2026.

Washington Court of Appeals Opinion: Weber v. Department of Corrections

The Washington Court of Appeals filed an opinion on March 9, 2026, concerning a Personal Restraint Petition filed by Charles Weber, Jr. The case involves a review of a prior judgment or order. Counsel for both the petitioner and the respondent (Department of Corrections) are listed.

Maria Diaz v Empac Risk Retention Group - Court of Appeals Opinion

The Washington Court of Appeals has issued an opinion in the case of Maria Diaz et al. v. Empac Risk Retention Group et al. The opinion was filed on March 9, 2026, under docket number 87027-1. This document represents a final appellate court decision.

Palin Rp Investments v. Butterfield Assoc. - Court Opinion

The Washington Court of Appeals, Division I, filed an opinion in the case of Palin Rp Investments-2, Llc, Et Al, Resps V. Butterfield Assoc., Inc, Et Al, Apps. The opinion was authored by Judge Michael Diaz and filed on March 9, 2026.

Washington Court of Appeals Opinion - Ellison v. Berryman

The Washington Court of Appeals filed an opinion in the case of In Re The Marriage Of: Benjamin Ellison, App. And Noelle Berryman, Res. The opinion was filed on March 9, 2026, under docket number 87236-2. The judgment under review was filed on August 23, 2024.

Roberts v. City of Seattle - Court of Appeals Opinion

The Washington Court of Appeals has issued an opinion in the case of Roberts v. City of Seattle, with Docket Number 88277-5. The opinion was filed on March 9, 2026, and concerns a judgment or order that was filed on May 8, 2025.

Sanders v Mirel - Washington Court of Appeals Opinion

The Washington Court of Appeals has issued an opinion in the case of Sanders v. Mirel. The opinion was filed on March 9, 2026, under docket number 87950-2. This is a standard publication of a court decision.

Conejos County Proceedings - Case Opinion

The US Federal Agencies feed has published a case opinion (25SA169) related to proceedings in Conejos County. The document provides details on a new location for these proceedings.

Colorado Judicial Branch Case 25SA334 Opinion

The Colorado Judicial Branch has issued an opinion for case 25SA334. This document provides the official ruling and reasoning for the case. The update also notes a new location for Conejos County proceedings.

Conejos County Proceedings Location Update

This notice announces a new location for proceedings in Conejos County, identified by case number 25SA198. A PDF of the case opinion is also provided.

State of Louisiana v. R.H. - Parental Rights Termination Appeal

The Louisiana Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court judgment revoking parental rights in the case of State of Louisiana in the Interest of R.H. The appellate court found that the trial court properly proceeded with the termination of parental rights trial in the parent's absence. The appeal stemmed from a judgment terminating parental rights due to cruelty to a juvenile charges.

SBK ART LLC v. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP - Discovery for Foreign Litigation

The Second Circuit affirmed a district court's order granting SBK ART LLC's petition for discovery in aid of foreign litigation under 28 U.S.C. §1782. The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in allowing discovery from Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, even though the documents might not be discoverable from the client abroad.

Connecticut Fair Housing Center v. CoreLogic Rental Property Solutions - Fair Housing Act

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on a case involving the Connecticut Fair Housing Center and CoreLogic Rental Property Solutions. The court vacated in part, affirmed in part, and reversed in part the lower court's decision regarding claims under the Fair Housing Act and Fair Credit Reporting Act.

US v. Cardenas - Second Circuit Court of Appeals Opinion

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the conviction of Jey James Roldan Cardenas for conspiracy to import cocaine. The court found that the district court erred in excluding evidence relevant to Cardenas's defense of lack of criminal intent. The case is remanded for further proceedings.

United States v. Aryeetey - Affirmation of Conviction and Sentence

The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the conviction and sentence of Ivanjoel Aryeetey for being a felon in possession of a firearm. The court found no abuse of discretion regarding DNA evidence disclosure and deemed the sentence substantively reasonable.

B.B. v. Hochul - Child Welfare and Due Process Rights

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed in part and affirmed in part a district court's dismissal of a case brought by fourteen children challenging New York's child certification scheme. The court found the plaintiffs have standing to sue, asserting violations of their due process rights to family integrity and freedom from harm.

Broadcast Music, Inc. v. North American Concert Promoters Association - Antitrust

The Second Circuit vacated a district court's decision regarding music licensing fees set by Broadcast Music, Inc. (BMI) for the North American Concert Promoters Association (NACPA). The court found the imposed rates and expanded definition of gross revenues to be unreasonable and remanded the case for further proceedings.

Mar-Can Transport v. Local 854 Pension Fund - ERISA Withdrawal Liability

The Second Circuit affirmed a district court's decision, reducing Mar-Can Transportation Company's ERISA withdrawal liability by $1.8 million. The court interpreted a key ERISA provision regarding the transfer of unfunded vested benefits when employees switch unions, impacting how pension funds calculate withdrawal obligations.

Reidy Contracting Group v. Mt. Hawley Insurance Company - Insurance Dispute

The Second Circuit affirmed a district court's judgment in an insurance dispute between Reidy Contracting Group and Mt. Hawley Insurance Company. The court held that Reidy was an additional insured and that Mt. Hawley's Employers Liability Exclusion was ambiguous and should be construed against Mt. Hawley.

Care One LLC v. NLRB - Unfair Labor Practice Proceedings

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's denial of a preliminary injunction sought by Care One LLC and affiliated healthcare facilities. The facilities sought to halt NLRB proceedings, arguing the ALJ was improperly appointed. The court found the plaintiffs could not demonstrate irreparable harm, thus affirming the denial.

US v Jimenez - 105 Months Prison for Felony Ammo Possession

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's judgment sentencing William Jimenez to 105 months imprisonment for felony ammunition possession. The court upheld the imposition of special conditions of supervised release, including electronic device searches and mandatory mental health counseling.

Safdieh v. Commissioner - Tax Court Summary Judgment Appeal

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a Tax Court decision, holding that the Commissioner of Internal Revenue can assess penalties for failure to report control of foreign businesses. The court vacated the Tax Court's summary judgment for the taxpayer, Joseph Safdieh, and remanded the case for further proceedings.

Miller v. Lamanna - Appeal of Dismissal

The Second Circuit vacated a district court's dismissal of a former corrections officer's discrimination and retaliation claims. The appellate court found the district court erred by converting a summary judgment motion into a Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal, considering only the complaint's allegations. The case is remanded for further proceedings.

Peña Garcia v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs - Workers' Comp

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied a petition for review, upholding a Department of Labor decision that denied reimbursement for medical cannabis edibles under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act. The court cited the Controlled Substances Act's classification of marijuana as a Schedule I substance.

Second Circuit Affirms Judicial Immunity in Concealed Carry License Case

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's dismissal of a lawsuit challenging New York's concealed carry license laws. The court held that state judges reviewing license applications are protected by absolute judicial immunity and that federal courts lack jurisdiction over such claims due to Article III's case-or-controversy requirement.

Bugliotti v. Republic of Argentina - Sovereign Bond Default

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals partially affirmed and partially vacated a district court's dismissal of a lawsuit by bondholders against the Republic of Argentina for defaulted sovereign bond payments. The court found that some of the bondholders' claims are timely under New York's COVID-era tolling provisions and that collateral estoppel does not bar all claims.

New York Private Well PFAS Testing and Rebate Pilot Program

New York State has launched a pilot program offering free PFAS testing and rebates for water treatment systems or connection to public water for private well owners in six counties. The program aims to address PFAS contamination in drinking water and is funded with $1.5 million per county.

Labor Department Issues Apprenticeship Guidance

The U.S. Department of Labor's Employment and Training Administration has issued new guidance to streamline the Registered Apprenticeship system, reduce burdens for program sponsors, and improve transparency. The guidance aims to accelerate growth and clarify program design, roles, and completion rates, with a commitment to 30-day registration determinations.

Labor Dept Recovers $293K Back Wages for Construction Workers

The U.S. Department of Labor recovered $293,698 in back wages for 56 construction workers from Speedy's Framing LLC for overtime violations under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The company also paid a $24,795 civil penalty.

NY AG Sues Live Nation/Ticketmaster for Monopoly

New York Attorney General Letitia James, leading a bipartisan group of 25 state attorneys general, announced they will continue their lawsuit against Live Nation/Ticketmaster for monopolizing the live entertainment industry. The states reject a recent settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice, deeming it insufficient to address the core monopoly issues.

NY AG OSI Investigates Civilian Death After Police Encounter

New York Attorney General's Office of Special Investigation (OSI) has opened an investigation into the death of a civilian following an encounter with Buffalo Police Department officers on March 5, 2026. The investigation is conducted under New York State Executive Law Section 70-b, which mandates OSI to assess incidents where a police officer may have caused a civilian's death.

Repeal of Veterinary Pharmaceutical Advisory Committee

Colorado Bill HB26-1182 proposes to repeal the Veterinary Pharmaceutical Advisory Committee, implementing a recommendation from the 2025 sunset report by the Department of Regulatory Agencies. The bill is currently under consideration in the 2026 Regular Session.

Colorado Bill Exempts Auctioneers from Charitable Solicitation Rules

Colorado HB26-1025 exempts auctioneers from the registration, bonding, and reporting requirements of the "Colorado Charitable Solicitations Act" when providing services to a charitable organization. This exemption applies regardless of whether the auctioneer is paid or volunteers, provided they do not directly handle contributions.

Colorado Bill SJR26-016: Improve Retirement Readiness

Colorado Senate Joint Resolution 26-016 has been introduced in the 2026 Regular Session, concerning the improvement of retirement readiness and financial well-being. The resolution is currently under consideration and has an upcoming Senate Consideration of Resolutions meeting scheduled.

Colorado Bill on Ratio Utility Billing Systems for Landlords

Colorado's HB26-1013 proposes to allow landlords to use ratio utility billing systems to allocate utility charges to tenants. The bill outlines specific requirements landlords must meet, including not exceeding the total utility cost and clearly disclosing the allocation method in rental agreements.

Colorado Bill Corrects Technical Defects in Revenue Statutes

Colorado HB26-1216 corrects technical defects and incorrect cross-references in statutes administered by the Department of Revenue. The bill clarifies conditions for tax credits, updates cross-references for fuel taxes and fees, and adjusts grant amounts for property tax and rent assistance.

Colorado Bill HB26-1088: Business Entity Filing and Fraudulent Filings

Colorado Bill HB26-1088 proposes changes to business entity filings with the Secretary of State. The bill would allow the Secretary to void filings with reversed payments and implement new procedures for handling fraudulent filings, including marking records and prohibiting fraudulent registered agents. It also modifies the process for dissolving entities based on fraudulent filings.

Colorado Bill Expands Definition of Emergency Services

Colorado HB26-1069 clarifies that emergency services include non-hospital transport and telemedicine, and expands the definition of 'first responder'. The bill mandates reimbursement for certain services starting January 1, 2027, and requires rule adoption by June 1, 2027.

Colorado Mandatory Lethality Assessment Act for Domestic Violence

Colorado Bill HB26-1009 proposes the "Colorado Mandatory Lethality Assessment Act," requiring peace officers to conduct lethality assessments during domestic violence incidents. The bill mandates training for officers and immediate victim referral if high-risk is indicated.

Colorado Bill: Optional Individualized Readiness Plan for School

Colorado HB26-1050 proposes to make it optional for local education providers to offer individualized readiness plans to students who meet minimum proficiency requirements on school readiness and kindergarten reading assessments. This bill is currently under consideration in the 2026 Regular Session.

Colorado Bill Updates Behavioral Health License Terminology

Colorado House Bill HB26-1220 proposes to update terminology within behavioral health licenses. The bill aims to change references from "acute treatment unit" to "behavioral health entity" to align with existing licensing structures established in previous legislative sessions.

Colorado Bill: Missing Person Alert Training for Peace Officers

Colorado Bill SB26-120 requires peace officers seeking certification or recertification to undergo training on missing person alerts. It also outlines procedures for higher education institutions to follow when a student is reported missing, including a preliminary wellness assessment period before notifying law enforcement.

Colorado HB26-1157: Human Services Supplemental Appropriation

Colorado HB26-1157 provides a supplemental appropriation to the Department of Human Services for the 2026 Regular Session. The bill has passed both houses and was signed into law on March 6, 2026.

ICE Houston Arrests Criminal Illegal Alien Child Sex Offenders

ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations in Houston announced the arrest of 414 criminal illegal aliens charged with or convicted of child sex offenses during President Trump's first year in office. This represents a significant increase compared to the previous administration, with the arrested individuals accounting for hundreds of child sex offenses and other crimes.

Hertzog v. Francisco - Custody Dispute Decision

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania affirmed a lower court's custody order granting primary physical custody to the mother and detailing requirements for the father to obtain unsupervised partial custody. The court found the trial court's decision to be supported by the record and free of legal error.

Com. v. Robinson - Criminal Appeal

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued a non-precedential decision affirming the dismissal of Donnelle Robinson's second petition for Post-Conviction Relief Act (PCRA) under docket numbers 1118 EDA 2025, 1119 EDA 2025, and 1120 EDA 2025. The appeal stems from orders entered on April 11, 2025, by the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County.

Com. v. Littles, K. - Criminal Sentencing Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a non-precedential decision in the case of Commonwealth v. Littles, K. The court affirmed the judgment of sentence imposed on Kevin Eugene Littles, Jr. for third-degree murder and robbery. The appeal challenged the discretionary aspects of his sentence.

Com. v. Harris - Criminal Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a non-precedential opinion in the criminal appeal case of Commonwealth v. Harris. The court affirmed the judgment of sentence entered by the trial court. The appeal concerned charges including rape, involuntary deviate sexual intercourse, strangulation, burglary, and robbery.

Com. v. Francis, C. - Criminal Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court reversed a trial court's decision to exclude expert testimony from a forensic scientist in the case of Com. v. Francis. The Commonwealth argued the trial court erred in precluding the testimony regarding THC vape pen devices found during a traffic stop. The appellate court agreed, remanding the case for further proceedings.

Com. v. Dunkowski - Criminal Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court affirmed the dismissal of Albert Dunkowski's PCRA petition but remanded for the sentencing court to consider his eligibility for Recidivism Risk Reduction Incentive (RRRI) credits. The court found that Dunkowski is entitled to relief on his newly raised claim regarding RRRI eligibility.

Pauletta v. Riverview Manor - Non-Precedential Court Decision

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania affirmed a lower court's order granting summary judgment to Riverview Manor Homeowners' Association in a dispute with unit owner Robert Pauletta. The case involved Pauletta's request to install a portable HVAC unit requiring an exterior vent, which was denied based on community covenants.

Commonwealth v. Jason Goodwill - PCRA Appeal

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania affirmed the dismissal of Jason Goodwill's PCRA petition. Goodwill appealed the denial of relief on claims of ineffective assistance of plea counsel. The court found the PCRA court properly denied relief.

Adoption of N.R.A., Appeal of M.A.A.

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania vacated and remanded orders terminating parental rights to four minors. The court found insufficient evidence under Section 2511(b) to support the termination, citing the mother's history of substance abuse and child neglect. The case involves docket numbers 915 WDA 2025, 916 WDA 2025, 917 WDA 2025, and 918 WDA 2025.

Com. v. Corbett - Probation Violation Appeal

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued a non-precedential decision in the case of Commonwealth v. Corbett. The court vacated the judgment of sentence and remanded the case for resentencing after the appellant appealed the revocation of his probation.

Adoption of S.R.A., Appeal of R.W.A., III - Parental Rights Termination

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania reviewed an appeal concerning the termination of parental rights for two minors. The court found a lack of clear and convincing evidence to support the termination under Section 2511(b) and has vacated and remanded the case for further proceedings.

Com. v. Dunkowski - Superior Court Opinion

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued a non-precedential opinion in Com. v. Dunkowski, docket number 1507 EDA 2025. While affirming the dismissal of the PCRA petition, the court granted relief on a new claim regarding the sentencing court's failure to consider RRRI eligibility, remanding for further consideration.

Com. v. Dunkowski - Appeal of PCRA Order Dismissal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court affirmed the dismissal of Christine R. Dunkowski's second petition for Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA) relief. The court found her claims to be either not cognizable under the PCRA or lacking merit. The case involves charges related to child endangerment.

Texas Court of Appeals Dismisses Mandamus Petition

The Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District, dismissed a petition for a writ of mandamus filed by Angela Bass. The court found the petition moot because the trial court had already vacated the order that was the subject of the mandamus request.

Ivan R. McCoy, Jr. v. Kitty Gale McCoy - Dismissed

The Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District, has dismissed the civil case Ivan R. McCoy, Jr. v. Kitty Gale McCoy for want of prosecution. The dismissal follows the appellant's failure to file a required brief by the established deadline.

Martinez v. Desilva - Case Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

The Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District, dismissed the case of Adam Martinez v. David Desilva for want of prosecution. The dismissal occurred because the appellant failed to file a required brief by the court-ordered deadline.

Ex Parte Robert Gildon v. State of Texas - Habeas Corpus Bail Appeal Dismissed

The Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District, dismissed appeals in Ex Parte Robert Gildon, Ex Parte Anna Gildon, and Ex Parte Felicia Mimms. The court found it lacked jurisdiction to hear appeals from associate judge orders denying habeas corpus applications for bail.

ZD Sand, LLC v. State of Texas - Mandamus Proceeding

The Texas Court of Appeals denied ZD Sand, LLC's petition for a writ of mandamus and lifted the temporary stay. The court's decision in docket number 03-26-00213-CV means the mandamus relief sought by ZD Sand, LLC was not granted.

Partain v. State of Texas - Injunction Affirmed

The Texas Court of Appeals affirmed a permanent injunction against Johnny Partain, who knowingly created and used a false financing statement to attempt to collect alleged debts from the State of Texas. The court found Partain's actions, including filing false financing statements and deeds, to be an attempt to collect a debt through improper means.

D. L. J. v. M. D. S. - Parental Rights Termination Case

The Texas Court of Appeals reversed and remanded a parental rights termination case (D. L. J. v. M. D. S., Docket No. 03-25-00696-CV). The court found that genuine issues of material fact existed regarding whether termination was in the child's best interest, necessitating further proceedings.

B.S. v. State of Texas - Dismiss Appeal

The Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District, has dismissed an appeal in the case of B.S. v. the State of Texas. The dismissal was granted following an unopposed motion filed by the appellant, a juvenile. The court cited Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1) for the dismissal.

Saldivar Mendo v. Flournoy Brown - Executory Contracts Dispute

The Texas Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's summary judgment in favor of Jeannine Flournoy Brown in a dispute over executory contracts for real property. The court found that the appellants' claims were either time-barred or not sufficiently challenged.

Ricardo Tapia Lopez v. State of Texas - Operation Lone Star

The Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District, denied a petition for writ of mandamus and an emergency motion to stay filed by Ricardo Tapia Lopez et al. The court found that the relators were not entitled to the relief sought in relation to multiple underlying criminal cases.

Com. v. Harris - Criminal Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a non-precedential opinion in the criminal appeal case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Willie L. Harris. The court affirmed the judgment of sentence entered by the trial court. The case involved charges including rape, involuntary deviate sexual intercourse, strangulation, burglary, and robbery.

Mark Skladany v. State of Texas - Capital Murder Appeal

The Texas Court of Appeals has abated and remanded the capital murder appeal of Mark Skladany to the trial court. The trial court must hold a hearing to determine if the appellant wishes to proceed and if his counsel has abandoned the appeal, with findings due by April 6, 2026.

Texas DPS v. Texas Tribune - Public Information Act Dispute

The Texas Court of Appeals has issued an opinion in the case of Texas DPS v. Texas Tribune et al. The court affirmed in part and reversed and remanded in part a lower court's decision regarding the disclosure of approximately 2.8 terabytes of data under the Texas Public Information Act following the Robb Elementary School shooting. The ruling impacts the accessibility of public records related to significant events.

Boehm v. State of Texas - Cruelty to Animals Case

The Texas Court of Appeals affirmed a misdemeanor conviction for cruelty to a non-livestock animal against Dr. Dana Boehm. The court found sufficient evidence that Dr. Boehm failed to provide necessary care to an animal in her custody while boarding it, and found no error in the jury instructions.

Steel Products from Japan: Final Antidumping Duty Review Results

The International Trade Administration has published the final results of the 2023-2024 administrative review of antidumping duties on diffusion-annealed, nickel-plated flat-rolled steel products from Japan. This notice finalizes the review for the specified period.

Aluminum Sheet from India: Final Countervailing Duty Review Results

The International Trade Administration has published the final results of the administrative review of the countervailing duty order on common alloy aluminum sheet from India for the period of review in 2023. This notice provides the final determination regarding the applicable duty rates.

Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Ecuador: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Countervailing Duty Expedited Review

The International Trade Administration has published preliminary results and a partial rescission of a countervailing duty expedited review concerning frozen warmwater shrimp from Ecuador. This notice details the preliminary findings of the review.

Certain Van-Type Trailers from Canada, China, Mexico: Postponement of Determinations

The International Trade Administration has issued a notice postponing the preliminary determinations for countervailing duty investigations on certain van-type trailers from Canada, China, and Mexico. This notice affects manufacturers and importers involved in these trade investigations.

International Trade Commission: Tow-Behind Lawn Groomers from China Determination

The International Trade Commission has issued a notice regarding the determination for certain tow-behind lawn groomers and parts thereof from China. This notice is part of Investigation No. 731-TA-1153 (Third Review).

Heavy Walled Rectangular Pipes and Tubes from Mexico Antidumping Duty Review

The International Trade Administration has published the preliminary results of its administrative review of antidumping duties on heavy walled rectangular pipes and tubes from Mexico for the 2023-2024 period. This notice also includes a rescission in part of the review.

Fresh Garlic from China: Court Decision and Amended Scope Ruling

The International Trade Administration has issued a notice regarding fresh garlic from the People's Republic of China. This notice announces a court decision that is not in harmony with a final scope ruling and provides an amended final scope ruling pursuant to that court decision. The ruling is effective March 5, 2026.

Lithium Hexafluorophosphate from China: Antidumping Duty Investigations Initiated

The International Trade Commission has initiated antidumping and countervailing duty investigations into Lithium Hexafluorophosphate from China. These investigations, identified as Investigation Nos. 701-TA-790 and 731-TA-1778 (Preliminary), mark the beginning of a process to determine if these imports are unfairly priced or subsidized.

Proposed Airworthiness Directive for Airbus SAS Airplanes

The Federal Aviation Administration has issued a proposed airworthiness directive concerning Airbus SAS airplanes. The proposal addresses potential failures in the pylon beam, with a comment period closing on April 24, 2026.

Airworthiness Directives: Airbus SAS Airplanes

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has issued an airworthiness directive (AD) concerning Airbus SAS airplanes. This AD mandates specific actions to address potential engine stalls, ensuring continued airworthiness and safety.

Airworthiness Directives: Airbus Helicopters

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has issued an airworthiness directive concerning Airbus AS355 helicopters. This rule addresses a potential hot air leakage issue and mandates specific actions to ensure continued airworthiness. The directive becomes effective on March 25, 2026.

HPM, Inc. v. M.C. Dean, Inc. - Contract Dispute Ruling

The District Court of Colorado ruled on a motion to dismiss in the contract dispute between HPM, Inc. and M.C. Dean, Inc. The court granted in part and denied in part the motion to dismiss the third amended complaint concerning a subcontract for work on Buckley Air Force Base.

Estate of Ian David Lockhart v. Sheriff James Van Beek - Lawsuit Dismissal Denied

The U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado denied a motion to dismiss in a lawsuit filed by the estate of an inmate who died by suicide. The lawsuit names the Eagle County Sheriff's Office and a behavioral health provider as defendants. The court's order allows the case to proceed.

SEC Obtains Partial Consent Judgments Against Legacy Cares Defendants

The SEC announced partial consent judgments against defendants in a municipal bond offering fraud case. The judgments enjoin the defendants from future securities law violations. This action stems from an alleged scheme involving fabricated documents to inflate revenue projections for a sports complex, leading to bond defaults.

United States v. Danielle McBreairty - Errata Sheet

The First Circuit Court of Appeals has issued an errata sheet to amend a court opinion originally issued on February 20, 2026. The amendment corrects a citation within the opinion. This is a minor procedural correction to a previously issued judicial decision.

USITC Finds China Erythritol Imports Injure U.S. Industry

The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has determined that imports of erythritol from China are injuring the U.S. industry. As a result, the U.S. Department of Commerce will issue antidumping and countervailing duty orders on these imports.

State AGs Continue Antitrust Case Against Live Nation

A coalition of 26 state Attorneys General announced they will continue their antitrust lawsuit against Live Nation, which owns Ticketmaster. The states are pursuing the case independently after a settlement with the federal government was deemed inadequate.

Henderson v. Lyft, Inc. et al - Civil Case

A new civil case, Henderson v. Lyft, Inc. et al, was filed on March 9, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case number is 3:26-cv-01939-RFL, and it falls under the category of Diversity jurisdiction with a Nature of Suit for Personal Injury: Other.

Sumisaki v. SSA Commissioner - Social Security Case

Grace Sumisaki filed a civil complaint against the SSA Commissioner in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, bearing number 4:26-cv-02027, was filed on March 9, 2026, with a filing fee of $405.

Kapil v. Levi Strauss & Co. - Civil Rights Job Discrimination

A civil rights job discrimination case titled Kapil v. Levi Strauss & Co. has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The complaint alleges discrimination, retaliation, and wrongful termination, with a jury trial demanded.

D.L. v. United States - Civil Rights Case

A new civil rights case, D.L. v. United States of America et al, was filed on March 9, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves the U.S. Government as a defendant and is categorized under Civil Rights: Other.

Florez Perez et al v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services - Mandamus & Other

A civil case, Florez Perez et al v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) et al, was filed on March 9, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a complaint for injunctive relief and a petition for a writ of mandamus.

Buntjer v. Adobe, Inc. - Civil Rights Jobs Case

A new civil rights case concerning employment has been filed against Adobe, Inc. and Talentburst, Inc. by Anna Buntjer. The case, filed on March 9, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, alleges violations under federal question jurisdiction.

A. v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons) - Civil Rights Case

A civil rights case has been filed against the US Bureau of Prisons. The case, identified as 4:26-cv-02021, was filed on March 9, 2026, in the US District Court for the Northern District of California. The nature of the suit is listed as 'Civil Rights: Other'.

C. v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons) - Civil Rights Case

A civil rights case was filed on March 9, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, C. v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons) et al., involves a complaint filed by Y. C. against the Federal Bureau of Prisons and other defendants.

Henry v. Community Federal Savings Bank - Labor Suit

A new civil case, HENRY v. COMMUNITY FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK, was filed on March 9, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case is a diversity labor suit, with the initial filing being a complaint and a proposed summons.

Bellevue School District v. Meta Platforms - Civil Case

The Bellevue School District has filed a civil lawsuit against Meta Platforms, Inc. and other defendants. The case, filed on March 9, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, is categorized under Personal Injury and Product Liability.

KAPLAN v. Blackshark.ai Inc. - Notice of Removal

Blackshark.ai Inc. filed a Notice of Removal in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, case number 3:26-cv-02016, on March 9, 2026. This action moves a case previously filed in the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, to federal court.

Templer v. Betzinger et al - Prisoner Civil Rights Case

A prisoner civil rights case, Templer v. Betzinger et al, was filed on March 9, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a prisoner's complaint regarding prison conditions.

Asercion v. The Gap, Inc. - Civil Case Filing

A civil case, Asercion v. The Gap, Inc., was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on March 9, 2026. The case involves a Notice of Removal from San Mateo County Superior Court, with The Gap, Inc. as the filing party.

Rangineni v. Rubio et al - Immigration Habeas Corpus

A new civil case, Rangineni v. Rubio et al, was filed on March 9, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves 'Other Immigration Actions' and includes a Petition for Writ of Mandamus and a Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief.

Dufour v. Southwest Airlines Co. - Civil Rights

Southwest Airlines Co. has filed a Notice of Removal in the case Dufour v. Southwest Airlines Co., case number 3:26-cv-02009, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The filing occurred on March 9, 2026, and includes a Certificate of Interested Entities.

Nordheim v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection - Administrative Review

Odin Nordheim filed a civil complaint against U.S. Customs and Border Protection on March 9, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, Nordheim v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection, is based on a federal question and involves review or appeal of an agency decision under the Administrative Procedures Act.

Habibi v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services - Immigration Mandamus

A complaint was filed on March 9, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, initiating a mandamus action in immigration law. The case, Habibi v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al., seeks to compel agency action. The filing fee was $405.

Innodata Inc. v. X Corp., Inc. - Contract Dispute

Innodata Inc. has filed a contract dispute lawsuit against X Corp., Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, docketed as 3:26-cv-02026, was filed on March 9, 2026, with a complaint and proposed summons being the initial filings.

Rodionova et al v. Asiana Airlines, Inc. - Civil Complaint

A civil complaint was filed on March 9, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, case number 3:26-cv-02013-PHK, by Iana Rodionova and V. R. against Asiana Airlines, Inc. The filing includes a complaint, motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and a proposed summons.

Levin et al v. Mercedes-Benz USA LLC - Civil Case Filing

A civil case, Levin et al v. Mercedes-Benz USA LLC, was filed on March 9, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case was removed from Contra Costa Superior Court, with Mercedes-Benz USA LLC listed as the filing party.

Tejada v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al - Civil Case

A new civil case, Tejada v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al, was filed on March 9, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves claims against Meta Platforms, Inc. and other related entities. The initial filing includes a complaint, certificate of interested entities, and proposed summons.

Kosari v. Meta Platforms - Civil Complaint

A civil complaint has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, case number 3:26-cv-02022, initiating a lawsuit by Arsham Kosari against Meta Platforms, Inc. and other defendants. The case was filed on March 9, 2026.

D. v. Uber Technologies Inc. - Personal Injury Product Liability

A new civil case, D. v. Uber Technologies Inc. et al., was filed against Uber Technologies Inc. on March 9, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case is based on diversity jurisdiction and concerns personal injury product liability.

Diamond v. The Campbell's Company - Product Liability

A new civil case, Diamond v. The Campbell's Company, was filed on March 9, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves personal injury and product liability claims. A recent filing indicates the case was transferred to this district as part of a multidistrict litigation.

Tino Cartez Sutton v. State of Tennessee - Appeal Dismissed for Late Filing

The Tennessee Court of Appeals dismissed an appeal filed by Tino Cartez Sutton due to a late filing of the notice of appeal. The appellant failed to file within the mandatory 30-day period required by Tennessee Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a).

Father's Appeal Dismissed for Failing to Comply with Briefing Rules

The Tennessee Court of Appeals dismissed a father's appeal because his brief failed to comply with appellate procedure rules. The court affirmed the trial court's dismissal of the father's petition for parenting time. This decision highlights the importance of adhering to procedural rules in appeals.

State v. Campos - Probation Revocation and Restitution Appeal

The Idaho Court of Appeals affirmed the revocation of Marlo Raymond Campos's probation but reversed and remanded the order for restitution. The original opinion dated November 14, 2025, was withdrawn and replaced by this substitute opinion filed on March 9, 2026.

State of Idaho v. Allen Paul Troup - Criminal Appeal

The Idaho Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's judgments of conviction and sentences for Allen Paul Troup for possession of a controlled substance. Troup appealed the denial of his motion to suppress and argued his sentence was excessive.

FDA Guidance: Flavored ENDS Premarket Applications

The FDA has issued guidance to assist with premarket tobacco product applications (PMTAs) for flavored electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS). This guidance, intended to improve submission and review efficiency, focuses on considerations related to youth risk. The document is non-binding and aims to inform potential future rulemaking.

FDA Draft Q&As on Biosimilar Development and BPCI Act

The FDA has issued a draft guidance document providing updated answers to common questions regarding biosimilar development and the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCI Act). This revision replaces a previous draft and focuses on specific Q&As related to the abbreviated licensure pathway for biological products.

FDA Q&A on Biosimilar Development and BPCI Act

The FDA has reissued its final guidance on biosimilar development and the BPCI Act, solely to withdraw three specific Q&As (I.8, I.10, and I.19). The agency is continuing to evaluate other Q&As for potential updates.

FDA Warning Letter to Ivim Services LLC for Misbranded Drugs

The FDA issued a warning letter to Ivim Services LLC for introducing misbranded compounded semaglutide and tirzepatide products into interstate commerce. The agency found that Ivim's website made false or misleading claims, suggesting Ivim was the compounder when it was not, violating the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.

FDA Warning Letter to Good Girl LLC for False Claims

The FDA issued a warning letter to Good Girl LLC (dba GoodGirlRX) for making false and misleading claims on its website regarding compounded semaglutide and tirzepatide products. The company claimed the products were 'FDA-approved' and that GoodGirl RX was the compounder, which the FDA states is false and misbrands the drugs.

FDA Warning Letter to Peaks Curative for False Claims

The FDA issued a warning letter to Peaks Curative, LLC for making false and misleading claims on its website regarding compounded semaglutide products. The agency found that the company misrepresented its compounding practices and implied FDA approval for products that are not FDA-approved, leading to misbranding violations.

FDA Warning Letter to PharmaZee for False Claims

The FDA issued a warning letter to PharmaZee for making false and misleading claims on its website regarding compounded semaglutide and tirzepatide products. The agency found that PharmaZee misrepresented itself as the compounder and implied FDA approval for these unapproved drugs, violating the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.

FDA Warning Letter to Refills Health for False Claims

The FDA issued a warning letter to Refills Health, LLC for making false and misleading claims on its website regarding compounded semaglutide products. The agency found that the company misrepresented itself as the compounder and made unsubstantiated claims such as 'clinically proven,' leading to the products being considered misbranded under the FDCA.

FDA Warning Letter to Lean Rx Inc. dba SkinnyRx

The FDA issued a warning letter to Lean Rx Inc. dba SkinnyRx for misbranding compounded semaglutide and tirzepatide products. The agency cited false or misleading claims on the company's website regarding the compounding of these drugs and their relation to FDA-approved medications.

State AGs Announce Consequences for Child Predators

Multiple State Attorneys General, including Florida AG James Uthmeier, announced significant actions against child predators. The announcement highlights the rearrest of Devon Huart and the sentencing of Michael Ambrosio, contributing to a record 1400 child predators taken down in a year.

Cin Dale 3 v. Peoples Bank Corp - Affirmation of Dismissal

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of a suit brought by Cin Dale 3 against Peoples Bank Corp. The court held that the bank acted appropriately by complying with a court order to turn over funds from a depositor's account to satisfy a judgment. This ruling reinforces the ministerial role of banks in judgment enforcement.

Marriage Dissolution Appeal Opinion

The Minnesota Court of Appeals filed a nonprecedential opinion on March 9, 2026, in the marriage dissolution appeal of DeGolier v. Baron. The court affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded the case concerning post-dissolution motions related to custody, child support, and spousal maintenance.

Custody Case Affirmed by Minnesota Court of Appeals

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision to modify a father's parenting time, reducing it to supervised visits. The court found no abuse of discretion in the district court's consideration of evidence and best-interest factors for the child.

Douglass v. Olson - Marriage Dissolution Case Affirmed

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision to modify a marriage dissolution judgment, awarding sole legal and physical custody of a child to the mother. The court found no error in the district court's modification order, which was based on evidence presented regarding the child's well-being.

State of Minnesota v. Daniel Martez Walker - Criminal Appeal

The Minnesota Court of Appeals filed a nonprecedential opinion affirming the conviction of Daniel Martez Walker for second-degree intentional murder and unlawful possession of a firearm. The court addressed Walker's arguments regarding the exclusion of evidence, juror bias, and voir dire.

Minnesota v. Troy Ray Gibson - Criminal Sexual Conduct Appeal

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision to dismiss criminal sexual conduct charges against Troy Ray Gibson. The dismissal was based on the statute of limitations, with the court finding that communications to child protection services did not trigger the limitations period.

State of Minnesota v. Zachariah Whitehead - Criminal Conviction Appeal

The Minnesota Court of Appeals filed a nonprecedential opinion affirming the kidnapping and deprivation of custodial rights convictions of Zachariah Christopher Whitehead. The court found sufficient evidence to sustain the convictions and rejected the appellant's arguments regarding jury instructions.

State v. Crockett - Criminal Conviction Appeal

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions of Dalvin Jarrell Crockett for first-degree criminal sexual conduct and first-degree aggravated robbery. The court found no abuse of discretion in the admission of prior-bad-acts evidence or the disqualification of a juror.

State of Minnesota v. Guy Willard Blessing - Criminal Appeal

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision in the case of State of Minnesota v. Guy Willard Blessing. The court found that the search warrant used to seize electronic devices was supported by probable cause, upholding the conviction for possession of pornographic work involving a minor.

State of Minnesota v. Korth and Snyder - Criminal Law

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision to suppress evidence and dismiss drug charges against two respondents. The court found that police lacked reasonable suspicion for a protective search of the vehicle after observing a knife.

Classic Auto Storage v. Restoration Technologies - Contract Dispute Opinion

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision in a contract dispute between Classic Auto Storage and Restoration Technologies. The court found that the jury's verdict regarding negligence and breach of contract claims, and the award of no damages, were supported by the evidence presented.

Maple Grove NBC, LLC v. Cake Gals Inc. - Appeal of Summary Judgment

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's orders granting summary judgment and attorney fees to respondent Cake Gals Inc. Appellant Maple Grove NBC, LLC had challenged these orders related to an Asset Purchase Agreement. The court's opinion is nonprecedential.

Civil Commitment Opinion - Serna

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed a commitment appeal panel's decision to dismiss a petition for discharge filed by Luis Antonio Serna, who is indeterminately committed as a sexually dangerous person. The court found that Serna failed to meet his burden to support a custody reduction due to his continued non-participation in treatment.

Kuller v. TVI, Inc. - Unemployment Benefits Appeal

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed a decision denying unemployment benefits to Kenneth Kuller. The court found that Kuller engaged in employment misconduct by exploiting a coupon policy and falsifying transactions, making him ineligible for approximately $6,000 in benefits.

Pedcor Management Corp. v. Pate - Eviction Judgment Affirmed

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed an eviction judgment for respondent-landlord Pedcor Management Corp. against appellants Becky and Trenton Pate. The court found that the landlord provided timely notice and that the district court did not err in its findings regarding rent payment and the handling of tenant motions.

State of Minnesota v. Anthony Dimitri Limogianni - Criminal Sexual Conduct Appeal

The Minnesota Court of Appeals filed a nonprecedential opinion affirming a conviction for criminal sexual conduct. The court found that the district court did not err in concluding that the appellant waived any objection to the closure of the courtroom during the victim's testimony.

Nesbit v. Covel-Paulzine - Property Partition Appeal

The Minnesota Court of Appeals has filed a nonprecedential opinion in the case of Nesbit v. Covel-Paulzine. The court remanded the case to the district court for additional findings regarding the partition of a jointly owned property and the equitable allocation of sale proceeds.

Court of Appeals affirms revocation of driving privileges and license plates

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's order sustaining the revocation of an appellant's driving privileges and the impoundment of his license plates. The appellant argued that evidence was obtained through an unconstitutional trespass, but the court found no error.

State v. Lashun Miller - Affirmation of Convictions

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions of Lashun Miller for first-degree burglary and third-degree assault. Miller had appealed after his petition for postconviction relief to withdraw his guilty plea was denied by the postconviction court.

Snowman Construction v. Ceresota Funding II LLC - Civil Appeal

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision in a construction dispute between Snowman Construction and Ceresota Funding II LLC. The court found no error in the admission of evidence, the handling of spoliation claims, findings of fact, or damage awards.

Donald D. Kern v. New Century Systems Inc. - Unemployment Benefits Appeal

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed a decision denying unemployment benefits to Donald D. Kern. The court found that Kern quit his employment without good reason caused by his employer and did not receive a fair hearing. The opinion was filed on March 9, 2026.

State v. Larson - Criminal Sexual Conduct Conviction Appeal

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed a conviction for first-degree criminal sexual conduct against Justin Duane Larson. The court rejected Larson's arguments regarding the denial of his motions to strike testimony, the denial of his mistrial motion, and the refusal to admit video conference testimony, finding the evidence sufficient to sustain the conviction.

Hogendorf vs. Green - Environmental Liability and Attorney Fees

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's judgment awarding attorney fees and costs to respondent Renee Hogendorf against appellants James Green Jr. and Well Groomed Lawns, Inc. The court found no error in the award of fees and costs under the Minnesota Environmental Response and Liability Act (MERLA).

N A Brothers LLC v. Werts - UPEPA Application in Defamation Case

The Minnesota Court of Appeals reversed and remanded a district court's denial of a special motion to dismiss under the Uniform Public Expression Protection Act (UPEPA). The court found that UPEPA should have been applied to claims of defamation and conspiracy brought by a childcare provider against former employees and parents.

State of Minnesota v. David Bernard Suess, Sr. - Criminal Conviction Appeal

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions of David Bernard Suess, Sr., for first- and second-degree criminal sexual conduct. The court found no error in the district court's admission of relationship and prior offense evidence at trial. This nonprecedential opinion provides guidance on evidentiary rulings in similar cases.

Court affirms denial of habeas corpus petition

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of a habeas corpus petition filed by Antoine C. Whitner. The court found that Whitner failed to state a claim for habeas relief, upholding the district court's decision. The case involved violations of supervised release conditions related to possession of child sexual abuse material.

Sadowski v. Suppi Construction Inc. - Interlocutory Appeal Denied

The Delaware Superior Court denied Suppi Construction Inc.'s application for certification of an interlocutory appeal. The appeal sought to challenge prior court decisions denying motions to dismiss and for summary judgment in a gender discrimination and retaliation lawsuit filed by Melissa Sadowski.

Diaby v. Bailey - Order Denying Interlocutory Appeal

The Delaware Superior Court denied TBD Standard, LLC's application for certification of an interlocutory appeal. The case involves a multi-vehicle collision that resulted in four separate lawsuits, which have been consolidated.

FINRA Adopts Amendments to Equity Trade Reporting Rules

FINRA has adopted amendments to its equity trade reporting rules, providing a limited, temporary exception for reporting qualifying overnight transactions executed before 8:00 a.m. Eastern Time. This exception will be effective from March 30, 2026, and will expire on December 31, 2027, or upon further extension of trade reporting facility operating hours.

DWC Draft ADA Accommodation Regulations for Public Comment

The California Division of Workers’ Compensation (DWC) has released draft regulations concerning ADA accommodations for public comment. The proposals include a process for blanket accommodation requests for remote appearances and a new form for filing disability discrimination complaints.

Health District Promotes Colon Cancer Prevention

The Rappahannock-Rapidan Health District has issued a notice encouraging healthy behaviors and early screenings to prevent colon cancer during National Colon Cancer Awareness Month. The notice highlights lifestyle risk factors and recommends screenings starting at age 45 for average-risk adults.

Hawai'i Government Employees Association v. Department of Public Safety - Correction

The Hawai'i Intermediate Court of Appeals has issued an order correcting minor errors in its August 18, 2025 opinion in Hawai'i Government Employees Association v. Department of Public Safety. The corrections involve specific word changes and formatting adjustments within the published opinion.

Lucas County Board of Commissioners v. EPA - Environmental Law

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals has recommended for publication the case of Lucas County Board of Commissioners v. EPA, concerning water quality standards for the Maumee River and Lake Erie. The decision addresses challenges related to harmful algal blooms and EPA's regulatory actions.

United States v. Phillip Claudius Gray - Non-Precedential Opinion

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's sentence of 21 months for Phillip Claudius Gray, who violated supervised release conditions by using illegal drugs. The court found no procedural error or unreasonable sentence.

Ricky Welch v. Laura Plappert - Court Opinion

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a district court's decision in Ricky Welch v. Laura Plappert. The court found that the federal statute of limitations for habeas petitions was tolled while the petitioner pursued a state appeal, reversing the district court's dismissal of the petition.

Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals Rule Revision

The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals has revised Rule 1.7 to update the correct and current mailing address for the Clerk of the Court. These amendments are effective immediately upon the date of the order.

Florida Renews Emergency Declaration for Hurricane Helene

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has renewed the state of emergency declaration for Hurricane Helene for an additional 60 days. This renewal extends Executive Order 24-208, which was initially issued in September 2024 and has been previously extended. The order aims to support ongoing recovery efforts in affected areas.

Florida Executive Order Extends State of Emergency for Tornadoes

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has issued Executive Order 26-57, extending the state of emergency declared for Holmes County due to tornadoes by an additional sixty (60) days. This extension continues support for recovery efforts following the May 2025 severe weather events.

Executive Order 26-56 Amending Rural Area of Opportunity Designation

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis issued Executive Order 26-56, amending Executive Order 23-132 to include Nassau County within the state's Rural Area of Opportunity. This amendment is effective immediately and applies all terms of the original designation to Nassau County.

Florida Extends Hurricane Debby Emergency Declaration

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has issued Executive Order 26-59, extending the state of emergency declared for Hurricane Debby by an additional 60 days. This extension continues the provisions of Executive Order 24-156, as amended, to support ongoing recovery efforts in the affected counties.

Shelton v. Patton - Motion to Dismiss Opinion

The District of Delaware issued an opinion in Shelton v. Patton, addressing defendants' motions to dismiss all five counts of the plaintiff's complaint. The court is considering whether the complaint states a claim upon which relief can be granted under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).

Astellas Pharma Inc. v. Ascent Pharmaceuticals, Inc. - Patent Infringement

The US District Court for the District of Delaware issued a Memorandum and Order in a patent infringement case involving Astellas Pharma Inc. and Ascent Pharmaceuticals, Inc. The case concerns Ascent's Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) for a generic version of Astellas's Myrbetriq® and alleges infringement of several patents under the Hatch-Waxman Act.

Ayestas v. Harris County District Attorney's Office - Habeas Corpus

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a discovery order in a habeas corpus case involving a capital murder conviction. The court found that the district court lacked jurisdiction over the selective-prosecution claims, vacating the order that compelled the Harris County District Attorney's Office to produce internal memoranda.

Fifth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Employment Discrimination Case

The Fifth Circuit affirmed a district court's decision to dismiss a plaintiff's employment discrimination and retaliation claims with prejudice. The dismissal was based on the plaintiff's counsel's repeated failure to comply with discovery orders and court deadlines over four years of litigation. The court found the dismissal to be a proper exercise of discretion.

Teacher v. Principal - First Amendment Prayer Rights

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals is reviewing a principal's claim of qualified immunity in a lawsuit filed by a teacher who alleges her prayer on school grounds was prohibited. The court will determine if the principal's actions violated the teacher's First Amendment rights.

US Government Mobilizes War Risk Insurance for Middle East Commerce

The U.S. International Development Finance Corporation (DFC) will offer political risk insurance and guaranty products to stabilize international commerce and support businesses operating in the Middle East. This initiative aims to mitigate disruptions caused by conflict with the Iranian regime and stabilize the war risk insurance market.

OFAC 50 Percent Rule: Ownership Aggregation and Sanctions Compliance

The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has issued guidance clarifying its 50 Percent Rule. This rule treats entities owned 50 percent or more in aggregate by blocked persons as themselves blocked, regardless of whether they are individually listed. The guidance emphasizes the need for sophisticated beneficial ownership tracing beyond simple list screening.

EU Proposes Industrial Accelerator Act for Public Procurement and Funding

The European Commission has proposed the Industrial Accelerator Act (IAA), which would introduce EU origin and low-carbon content requirements for public procurement and public funding. The proposal aims to boost the EU's manufacturing share and includes conditions for foreign direct investments in key sectors.

Omnibus I Directive Amends EU Sustainability Reporting and Due Diligence

The EU's Omnibus I Directive, amending the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), has been published in the Official Journal. This directive aims to streamline sustainability reporting and due diligence obligations for businesses operating within the EU.

SEC Exempts FPI Directors/Officers from Section 16 Reporting

The SEC issued an order exempting directors and officers of certain foreign private issuers (FPIs) from Section 16 reporting obligations. This exemption applies to FPIs from qualifying jurisdictions with substantially similar regulations and provides relief ahead of the March 18, 2026, reporting deadline.

SEC Exempts FPI Directors and Officers from Section 16 Reporting

The SEC has issued an order exempting directors and officers of certain foreign private issuers (FPIs) from Section 16(a) reporting requirements. This exemption is effective immediately and applies to FPIs incorporated in qualifying jurisdictions with qualifying regulations, ahead of the March 18, 2026 compliance deadline.

Export Control Complexity Grows with Technology and Geopolitics

This article discusses the increasing complexity of export control and sanctions regimes due to technological advancements and geopolitical shifts, using the UK as an example. It highlights that failure to comply with UK export controls can result in severe penalties, including fines and imprisonment.

Importers Eye IEEPA Tariff Refunds After Supreme Court Ruling

Following a Supreme Court ruling that President Trump's IEEPA tariffs were unlawful, importers are seeking refunds. The administration plans to complicate the refund process, leaving the Court of International Trade to handle thousands of cases. The CIT has issued an initial order confirming importers' entitlement to refunds.

Court Orders Refund of Invalidated IEEPA Tariffs

The Court of International Trade (CIT) has ordered U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to halt liquidation of invalidated IEEPA tariffs and begin unwinding assessed duties. This broad order in Atmus Filtration, Inc. v. United States aims to provide relief to all importers of record, including those who did not file their own refund actions.

Force Majeure in Gulf Construction Contracts Amid Iran Conflict

This client alert from King & Spalding discusses force majeure clauses in Gulf construction contracts in response to the Iran conflict. It outlines typical contractual regimes, legal implications, and provides practical advice for employers and contractors facing supply chain and logistical disruptions.

EU Commission Proposes Industrial Accelerator Act

The European Commission has proposed the Industrial Accelerator Act (IAA) to bolster the EU's industrial base, aiming to increase manufacturing's GDP share to 20% by 2035. The act targets challenges like high energy costs and regulatory hurdles, seeking to enhance resilience and strategic autonomy.

SEC Adopts Section 16 Reporting Rules for Foreign Private Issuers

The SEC adopted final amendments requiring directors, officers, and 10% owners of foreign private issuers (FPIs) to file beneficial ownership reports on Forms 3, 4, and 5, effective March 18, 2026. The SEC also issued an order granting conditional exemptive relief for certain FPIs subject to substantially similar local reporting rules.

BIS Fines Teledyne FLIR $1 Million for Export Violations

The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) has fined Teledyne FLIR $1 million for 19 violations of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), including miscalculating de minimis rules for exports to China and unauthorized exports to an Entity List address. The company must pay the fine within 30 days or risk losing export privileges.

OECD Releases AI Due Diligence Guidance for Multinationals

The OECD has published new Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible AI, aimed at multinational enterprises involved in the AI value chain. This guidance complements existing OECD guidelines and aims to assist companies in implementing responsible AI practices and human rights policies.

DITC Enforcement Guide for Cayman Islands Entities

The Cayman Islands Department for International Tax Cooperation (DITC) has increased its supervisory oversight and enforcement activities. This guide explains DITC enforcement notices, common triggers for non-compliance, and strategies for responding to mitigate penalties and reputational risk for Cayman Islands entities.

Cross-Border ESI Transfers: Regulatory Challenges and AI Impact

This notice discusses the evolving regulatory challenges surrounding cross-border transfers of electronically stored information (ESI) for litigation. It highlights the complexities arising from data privacy laws, discovery obligations, and the impact of AI and cloud computing, with a panel discussion scheduled for March 11, 2026.

US and Mexico Coordinate Sanctions on Cartel Timeshare Fraud

The US Treasury's OFAC and Mexico's SHCP have coordinated sanctions against five individuals and 19 entities involved in timeshare fraud linked to the CJNG cartel. This action builds on previous designations and aims to combat cartel-linked financial crimes.

US Directs Dismantling of Criminal Cartels in Western Hemisphere

The US government has issued an executive order directing federal agencies to dismantle criminal cartels and transnational gangs operating in the Western Hemisphere. The order mandates coordination with allied governments, military training for partner nations, and the use of all legal authorities to counter cartel-driven violence and corruption.

CIT Ruling on IEEPA Duties Impacts Importer Refunds

The U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) issued an order in Atmus Filtration, Inc. v. United States directing CBP to liquidate entries without regard to IEEPA duties. This ruling impacts importers seeking refunds of tariffs previously imposed under IEEPA, following a Supreme Court decision.

Trade Court Orders $166 Billion Refund of IEEPA Duties

The U.S. Court of International Trade has ordered U.S. Customs and Border Protection to refund approximately $166 billion in duties paid by over 330,000 importers under unlawful tariffs imposed via IEEPA. This follows a Supreme Court ruling invalidating the tariffs.

Commonwealth v. Sprows-Watson - Appeals Court Opinion

The Massachusetts Appeals Court issued a non-precedential summary decision affirming a lower court's order denying the Commonwealth's motion for a continuance and allowing the defendants' motions to dismiss charges without prejudice. The decision addresses discovery disputes related to traffic stops and enforcement patterns.

Sophia Terry v. William Powley - Contempt of Court

The Massachusetts Appeals Court affirmed a Probate and Family Court judgment finding a mother not in contempt for alleged violations of a parenting time order. The court found insufficient evidence of clear and convincing disobedience of the court's command regarding supervised parenting time.

Thomas B. Francis, Third v. Suffolk County Sheriff's Department - Employment Discrimination Appeal

The Massachusetts Appeals Court issued a non-precedential opinion affirming a lower court's decision regarding employment discrimination claims. The plaintiff appealed after a jury found in favor of the employer on retaliation claims, following summary judgment on sexual harassment and age discrimination claims.

Guy Maddalone v. Board of Appeals of Nantucket - Zoning Special Permit Appeal

The Massachusetts Appeals Court issued a non-precedential opinion affirming a Land Court judgment that upheld the Nantucket Board of Appeals' decision to grant a special permit. The permit allows for the renovation and enlargement of existing structures on a property, despite objections from an abutter.

Commonwealth v. Scott K. Tavares - Probation Violation Appeal

The Massachusetts Appeals Court issued a non-precedential opinion affirming an order revoking Scott K. Tavares' probation. The defendant appealed, claiming ineffective assistance of counsel and due process violations related to new criminal offenses alleged as probation violations.

Trifecta v. CT Investments - Arizona Court of Appeals Opinion

The Arizona Court of Appeals reversed and remanded a lower court's decision, finding that a judgment was satisfied in full. The court determined that the plaintiff accepted payments from a third party that fully covered the judgment amount, contrary to the lower court's ruling.

Arizona Court of Appeals - Parental Rights Termination

The Arizona Court of Appeals affirmed the termination of parental rights for a mother due to ongoing substance abuse and neglect. The decision, docketed as 1 CA-JV 25-0144, is non-precedential and applies only to the specific case.

US v. Tekola - Sentence Affirmed for Drug Distribution

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Isaac Tekola's sentence for drug distribution charges. The court upheld the district court's decision to apply a sentencing enhancement for maintaining a premises for drug trafficking, finding it was a primary use of his residence.

Cultural Property Grants 2026 Program Cycle Announced

The Bureau Of Educational and Cultural Affairs announced the 2026 program cycle for Cultural Property Agreement Implementation Grants (CPAIG). U.S. embassies in countries with cultural property agreements can submit applications for projects to protect cultural property. The application deadline is April 15, 2026, though specific embassy deadlines may vary.

State AGs Continue Live Nation Antitrust Lawsuit

Massachusetts and 26 other states, led by Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell, will continue their antitrust lawsuit against Live Nation and Ticketmaster. This action proceeds despite the US Department of Justice's separate settlement with the companies, aiming to address alleged monopolistic practices in the live entertainment industry.

State AG Recovers $214,842 for Payroll Violations

The Massachusetts Attorney General's Office has secured $214,842 from Excel Nursing Services, Inc. and its president for wage theft violations. The agency unlawfully delayed payroll payments to 107 employees, violating state wage laws.