Snyder v. Cohen - SLAPP Motion Ruling
The California Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court's decision to strike a complaint filed by Stephen Snyder against Les Cohen and his attorneys. The court found the complaint to be a Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP) arising from protected petitioning activity.
Zeng v. Wang - Sanctions and Custody Appeal
The California Court of Appeal filed an opinion in Zeng v. Wang concerning an appeal of sanctions and custody orders. The court affirmed orders denying a request for minor's counsel and a child custody evaluator, while also affirming the denial of a request for sanctions, finding the minute order imposing sanctions not appealable.
Cruz v. Superior Court CA4/2 - Domestic Violence Restraining Order
The California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two, granted a petition for writ of mandate in Cruz v. Superior Court. The court ordered the Superior Court to vacate its order continuing a Domestic Violence Restraining Order hearing and to set a hearing within the timeframe required by Family Code section 242(a). The opinion was filed on March 9, 2026.
People v. Rodriguez - Criminal Sentencing Appeal
The California Court of Appeal filed an opinion in the case of People v. Rodriguez on March 9, 2026. This appeal concerns the resentencing of defendant Angel Michael Rodriguez following a prior habeas corpus petition that led to the striking of certain enhancements based on a prior conviction. The court affirmed the resulting judgment after directing a mathematical correction to the calculation of credits.
People v. Cooper - Criminal Appeal
The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, affirmed an order and judgment in the case of People v. Cooper. The defendant appealed his conviction for second-degree murder, arguing the trial court erred in revoking his pro. per. status after he refused to appear for a pretrial hearing. The appellate court found no abuse of discretion.
People v. Johnson - Criminal Appeal
The California Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court's decision in People v. Johnson, regarding a criminal defendant's right to self-representation and counsel during sentencing. The court found no error in denying the defendant's request to reappoint counsel after he had initially waived it.
People v. Duyon - Attempted Robbery Appeal
The California Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment against James Duyon, who appealed after pleading guilty to attempted robbery. The court found no arguable issues in the appeal, upholding the trial court's decision to suspend sentence and place the defendant on probation.
People v. Green - Sentencing Appeal
The California Court of Appeal reviewed an order recalling a defendant's sentence and holding a resentencing hearing. The court affirmed the trial court's decision to dismiss a prior prison term enhancement but otherwise decline further sentence reduction, addressing the defendant's request to represent himself.
People v. Paez - Criminal Appeal
The California Court of Appeal modified a criminal judgment, striking a condition that allowed warrantless searches of electronic devices as invalid under People v. Lent. The court upheld other probation conditions, including mandatory participation in a sex offender treatment program.
People v. Rufo - Murder Conviction Appeal
The California Court of Appeal, Fifth Appellate District, filed an opinion in the case of People v. Rufo. The defendant was convicted of second-degree murder and a firearm enhancement, but the enhancement was dismissed in the interest of justice. The appellate court affirmed the judgment.
People v. Reed - Criminal Sentencing Appeal
The California Court of Appeal reversed and remanded a trial court's denial of a defendant's petition for recall and resentencing. The appellate court agreed with the People that the trial court erred in applying the doctrine of the law of the case to deny the petition.
People v. Bolduc - Criminal Threats Conviction Appeal
The California Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, filed an opinion in the case of People v. Bolduc on March 9, 2026. The court affirmed the conviction for making criminal threats, finding the trial court adequately ensured a factual basis for the defendant's plea.
White v. Pixley - Civil Harassment Restraining Order Appeal Dismissal
The California Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, filed an opinion in White v. Pixley on March 9, 2026, dismissing the defendant's second attempt to appeal a civil harassment restraining order. The court found the appeal barred due to a prior dismissal with prejudice.
Tan v. Chan - Modification of Opinion and Denial of Rehearing
The California Court of Appeal, Sixth Appellate District, has issued an order modifying a previously filed opinion in Tan v. Chan and denying the appellants' petition for rehearing. The modification involves adding a footnote to clarify the basis for a demand for records under a specific statute. The judgment remains unchanged.
In re L.C. - Parental Rights Termination Appeal
The California Court of Appeal, Sixth Appellate District, filed an opinion in the case In re L.C. on March 6, 2026. The court affirmed the juvenile court's order terminating mother K.M.'s parental rights, finding no abuse of discretion in denying her petition to reinstate reunification services.
Alameda County Taxpayers' Assn. v. City of Oakland - Initiative Measure Validity
The California Court of Appeal ruled on an initiative measure (Measure Y) funding the Oakland Zoo. The court found certain provisions violated the state constitution but were severable, upholding the measure with modifications. The ruling clarifies initiative validity and funding mechanisms for public facilities.
States v. Mackrell - Civil Harassment Restraining Order Attorney Fees
The California Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court's award of $8,397.43 in attorney fees to Jessica States in a civil harassment restraining order case against Jeanie MacKrell. The court found no abuse of discretion in awarding fees to the prevailing party.
Center for Biological Diversity v. Public Utilities Commission - Net Energy Metering Tariff
The California Court of Appeal filed an opinion regarding the net energy metering (NEM) tariff, affirming the Public Utilities Commission's successor tariff. The case, Center for Biological Diversity, Inc. v. Public Utilities Com., addresses whether the successor tariff is consistent with state law directing the commission to prevent cost shifts to non-NEM customers.
People v. Perez - Criminal Appeal
The California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two, filed an opinion in the case of People v. Perez on March 9, 2026. The court affirmed the trial court's judgment after the defendant pleaded no contest to attempted murder and admitted sentencing enhancements. This is a non-precedential opinion.
Zeng v. Wang - Domestic Violence Restraining Order Appeal
The California Court of Appeal affirmed an order granting a new trial on a domestic violence restraining order (DVRO) renewal but reversed the DVRO renewal order as it applied to the parties' daughter. The court found the father did not receive adequate notice regarding the daughter's inclusion.
State AGs Continue Antitrust Lawsuit Against Live Nation/Ticketmaster
California Attorney General Rob Bonta and 26 other state attorneys general announced they will continue their antitrust lawsuit against Live Nation/Ticketmaster, rejecting the U.S. DOJ's settlement. The states aim to hold the company accountable for anticompetitive conduct harming consumers and the live music industry.
CPUC Program to Help Californians Rebuild All-Electric Homes
The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) has launched the Rebuilding Incentives for Sustainable Electric (RISE) Homes program, a $50 million initiative to assist Californians who lost homes to natural disasters since 2017. The program offers financial incentives for rebuilding fully electric homes and begins accepting applications on April 6, 2026.
California PUC New Filings and Proposed Decisions
The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) has published its weekly update of new filings and proposed decisions for the week of March 2-6, 2026. These filings include proposed decisions on utility leasing, energy recovery applications, and renewable gas standards, as well as new complaints and applications from Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
Texas AG Stops Sale of Chest Binders to Minors
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has secured a Temporary Restraining Order against Lola Olivia, Inc., a New York-based online retailer. The order immediately halts the sale and shipment of chest binders to individuals in Texas, particularly targeting sales to young girls.
Federal Court Strikes Down HUD/USDA Energy Rule
A federal court has struck down a Biden-era rule from HUD and USDA that imposed stricter energy efficiency requirements on new home construction financed by federal programs. The court ruled the agencies lacked statutory authority and that the rule would negatively impact affordable housing availability.
Daphne Veal v. Joseph A. Campo and XYZ Insurance - Louisiana Court of Appeal
The Louisiana Court of Appeal denied a writ application from Daphne Veal against Joseph A. Campo and XYZ Insurance Company. The court cited failure to include necessary documentation, such as court minutes and hearing transcripts, as the reason for denial.
State Of Louisiana v. Claudius Timotheus Davis - Criminal Case
The Louisiana Court of Appeal denied a writ application filed by Claudius Timotheus Davis. The court found that the relator had not been convicted and sentenced, and therefore was not entitled to an appeal at this stage, with jurisdiction remaining with the district court.
State v. Matthew Eekiel Pier - Criminal Appeal
The Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit, denied a writ application in the case of State of Louisiana v. Matthew Ezekiel Pier. The docket number for this case is 2025 KW 1129. The court's decision was issued on March 9, 2026.
Ashley Sanchez v. The Office of Debt Recovery - Legal Opinion
The Louisiana Court of Appeal denied a writ in the case of Ashley Sanchez v. The Office of Debt Recovery. The court's decision, dated March 9, 2026, pertains to docket number 2025 CW 1342.
Louisiana v. Todd Schliem Police Chief - Court Opinion
The Louisiana Court of Appeal granted in part and denied in part a writ application concerning a district court's dismissal of claims against a police chief and sheriff. The court remanded the matter to the district court with instructions to grant an appeal to the plaintiff.
Covington v. Waterworks District No. 1 - Court Opinion
The Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit, considered a writ application in Covington v. Waterworks District No. 1. The court found the application was not considered due to failure to include required court minutes and a hearing transcript, violating Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal.
State v. Edward Schertler, II - Louisiana Court Opinion
The Louisiana Court of Appeal reversed a district court's ruling that granted a motion to suppress evidence. The appellate court found that probable cause existed for the issuance of a search warrant, reversing the suppression and remanding the case for further proceedings.
Sutter v. Lakeshore Estates Homeowner's Association - Court Opinion
The Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit, issued an opinion in the case of Malcolm H. Sutter v. Lakeshore Estates Homeowner's Association, Inc. The court denied the writ application, with the specific details of the underlying dispute not elaborated in the provided text.
Municipal Police Employees Retirement System v. Alvin R. Bradley, Sr. - Writ Denial
The Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit, denied a writ application in the case of Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System v. Alvin R. Bradley, Sr. The court's decision, dated March 9, 2026, does not specify the nature of the writ or the underlying dispute.
State of Louisiana v. Rocshey D. Carmel - Criminal Appeal
The Louisiana Court of Appeal denied a writ application from Rocshey D. Carmel, stating the applicant failed to demonstrate seeking relief in the district court first or show extraordinary circumstances justifying bypassing the lower court. The court noted the application appeared to be a motion to remove appointed counsel filed directly with the appellate court.
State of Louisiana v. Elvis Graham - Criminal Appeal
The Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit, denied a writ filed by Elvis Graham. The court found the matter moot as the district court had already denied the relator's motion to enforce an order on October 10, 2025. The opinion was issued on March 9, 2026.
Louisiana v. Roosevelt D. Jones - Court Opinion
The Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit, denied a writ application filed by Roosevelt D. Jones in case number 2025 KW 1319. The court's decision upholds the lower court's ruling, with no specific details on the underlying case provided in this opinion.
Anh Lien LLC v. Atlantic Casualty Insurance Company - Court Opinion
The Louisiana Court of Appeal denied supervisory writs in the case of Anh Lien, LLC and Henry Nguyen v. Atlantic Casualty Insurance Company. The court's decision pertains to a matter filed in the 22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany.
Kendal Bellard v. Henry A. Hollier - Louisiana Court of Appeal Opinion
The Louisiana Court of Appeal reversed a lower court's decision, ruling that a delivery driver's employment contract is exempt from arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act. The court found that the driver, as a transportation worker involved in interstate commerce, falls under the Act's exemption.
Municipal Police Retirement System v. Paris C. Sumrall - Writ Denial
The Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit, denied a writ application in the case of Municipal Police Retirement System v. Paris C. Sumrall. The court's decision, dated March 9, 2026, relates to a matter concerning the Village of Varnado and its officials.
Stenhouse v. Louisiana Women's Healthcare Associates, L.L.C. - Writ Denial
The Louisiana Court of Appeal denied a writ application in the case of Dr. James Stenhouse v. Louisiana Women's Healthcare Associates, L.L.C., et al. The court found that the criteria for granting the writ were not met, referencing the standard set in Herlitz Construction Co., Inc. v. Hotel Investors of New Iberia, Inc.
Louisiana v. James Jerrod Spikes - Court Opinion
The Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit, issued a court opinion denying supervisory writs in the case of State of Louisiana v. James Jerrod Spikes. The docket number for this case is 2025 KW 1201.
BAC Home Loans Servicing v. Stockstill - TILA and FDCPA Claims
The Louisiana Court of Appeal granted a writ in BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P. v. Stockstill, reversing the trial court's denial of a motion for summary judgment. The appellate court found that the Stockstills' claims under the Truth-in-Lending Act (TILA) were time-barred.
Claybourn v. Finley - Louisiana Court of Appeal Opinion
The Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit, issued an opinion in Claybourn v. Finley, docket number 2025 CW 1287. The court considered a writ application from Maria Finley and Maria A. Finley, Attorney at Law, LLC. The application was not considered due to the relator failing to include a copy of the petition.
H.T.H. v. B.B.W. - New Jersey Superior Court Opinion
The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed a final restraining order and an award of attorney's fees in the case of H.T.H. v. B.B.W. The court found sufficient evidence to support the predicate act of assault and the need for the restraining order, as well as the reasonableness of the fee award.
L.A. v. E.K. - Child Relocation and Custody Case
The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed a lower court's order granting a parent primary residence and permission to relocate with a child to Connecticut. The case involved child relocation and custody disputes between the parents.
Mitchell Kotler v. Noah Kane - Civil Appeal
The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division dismissed the appeal in Mitchell Kotler v. Noah Kane (Docket No. A-2256-24) with prejudice and without costs, as the parties have settled their dispute. This non-precedential opinion is binding only on the parties involved.
DCPP v. M.M. and A.M. - Child Abuse and Neglect Case
The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division issued an opinion in DCPP v. M.M. and A.M. concerning findings of abuse and neglect. The court found that the trial court improperly admitted hearsay opinions from a child psychologist, which were critical to the case's outcome. The decision may impact how child testimony and expert assessments are handled in future cases.
S.S. v. Woodcliff Lake Board of Education - Appeal of HIB Policy Decision
The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed in part and remanded in part a decision regarding the dismissal of a complaint. The case involved a student disciplined under the Board's Harassment, Intimidation, and Bullying (HIB) policy and the subsequent appeal process.
New Jersey Solar Transition Court Opinion
The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed a decision by the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities denying extension requests for solar energy projects under the Transition Incentive program. The court's opinion is non-precedential.
New Jersey Solar Transition Case Opinion
The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed the Board of Public Utilities' denial of extension requests for solar energy projects under the Transition Incentive (TI) program. The court's decision impacts Ecological Systems, LLC and NJ Solar Power regarding their project timelines and eligibility.
M.B.M. v. M.R.-l. - Non-Precedential Court Opinion
The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed a Family Part order regarding child custody and visitation. The court designated the plaintiff as the parent of primary residence and ordered supervised visitation for the defendant. The opinion is non-precedential.
New Jersey Solar Transition Program Appeal
The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division reversed a decision by the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (BPU) regarding a solar energy project's certification. The court found that the BPU improperly denied a request for an extension to submit post-construction certification documents for a project registered in the Transition Incentive program.
Gold Tree Spa, Inc. v. Pd Nail Corp. - Appeal of Sanctions
The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division issued a non-precedential opinion affirming a trial judge's order sanctioning defendants PD Nail Corp., CD Nail Corp., Hee Jung Kim, and Sook Hee Kim an additional $39,274.31 for filing frivolous litigation. The defendants are appealing multiple prior orders related to discovery disputes and summary judgment.
SBK ART LLC v. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP - Discovery for Foreign Litigation
The Second Circuit affirmed a district court's order granting SBK ART LLC's petition for discovery in aid of foreign litigation under 28 U.S.C. §1782. The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in allowing discovery from Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, even though the documents might not be discoverable from the client abroad.
US v. Cardenas - Cocaine Import Conspiracy Conviction Vacated
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated the conviction of Jey James Roldan Cardenas for conspiracy to import cocaine. The court found that the district court erred in excluding evidence relevant to Cardenas's defense of lacking criminal intent, remanding the case for further proceedings.
Broadcast Music, Inc. v. North American Concert Promoters Association - Antitrust
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a district court's decision regarding music licensing fees set by Broadcast Music, Inc. (BMI) for the North American Concert Promoters Association (NACPA). The court found the imposed rates and expanded definition of gross revenues to be unreasonable and remanded the case for further proceedings.
B.B. v. Hochul - Children's Due Process Rights in Foster Care
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed in part and affirmed in part a district court's decision in B.B. v. Hochul, finding that plaintiffs (children removed from parents) have standing to sue over New York's certification scheme for relative foster parents. The court remanded for further proceedings, noting some claims were moot.
Care One LLC v NLRB - Unfair Labor Practices Proceedings
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's denial of a preliminary injunction for Care One LLC and its affiliates. The court found that despite arguments regarding the NLRB's quorum and ALJ appointment, the plaintiffs could not demonstrate irreparable harm necessary for injunctive relief to halt unfair labor practice proceedings.
McGucken v. Shutterstock, Inc. - Copyright Infringement Appeal
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed in part and vacated in part a lower court's decision in McGucken v. Shutterstock, Inc. The court affirmed the dismissal of copyright management information claims but remanded copyright infringement claims for further proceedings, finding factual issues regarding DMCA safe harbor immunity.
Reidy Contracting Group LLC v. Mt. Hawley Insurance Company - Insurance Coverage Dispute
The Second Circuit affirmed a district court's judgment, holding that Mt. Hawley Insurance Company must provide additional insured coverage to Reidy Contracting Group, LLC. The court found Reidy to be an additional insured and construed an ambiguous Employers Liability Exclusion against Mt. Hawley.
Connecticut Fair Housing Center v. CoreLogic Rental Property Solutions - Fair Housing Act
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated in part, affirmed in part, and reversed in part a district court decision concerning claims that CoreLogic Rental Property Solutions violated the Fair Housing Act and Fair Credit Reporting Act. The court found the Connecticut Fair Housing Center lacked standing and that CoreLogic did not cause housing denials based on criminal history, but also found CoreLogic violated the FCRA regarding conservatorship documentation.
US v. Jiminez - Sentence Affirmation for Felony Conviction
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's judgment against William Jimenez, upholding his 105-month sentence for possessing ammunition after a felony conviction. The court found no abuse of discretion in the imposed special conditions of supervised release, including electronic device searches and mental health counseling.
Safdieh v. Commissioner - Tax Court Summary Judgment Granted
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a Tax Court order that had granted summary judgment to Joseph Safdieh, ruling that the Commissioner of Internal Revenue may assess penalties for failing to report control of a foreign business. The court remanded the case for further proceedings.
US v. Aryeetey - Affirmation of Conviction and Sentence
The Second Circuit affirmed the conviction and sentence of Ivanjoel Aryeetey for being a felon in possession of a firearm. The court found no abuse of discretion in admitting DNA evidence and deemed the sentence substantively reasonable.
Miller v. Lamanna - Appeal of Dismissal
The Second Circuit vacated a district court's dismissal of a former corrections officer's race discrimination and retaliation claims. The appellate court found the district court erred by converting a summary judgment motion into a Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal motion, considering only the complaint's allegations.
Kellogg v. Nichols - Concealed Carry License Case
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of a lawsuit challenging New York's concealed carry license laws. The court held that state court judges are absolutely immune from individual-capacity lawsuits and that federal courts lack jurisdiction for official-capacity claims seeking injunctive or declaratory relief due to Article III's case-or-controversy requirement.
Peña Garcia v. Department of Labor - Workers' Compensation
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals denied a petition for review filed by Luis Peña Garcia, who sought reimbursement for medical cannabis edibles under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act. The court affirmed the Department of Labor's decision, citing the Controlled Substances Act's classification of marijuana.
Mar-Can Transport v. Local 854 Pension Fund - ERISA Withdrawal Liability
The Second Circuit affirmed a District Court ruling, directing the Local 854 Pension Fund to reduce Mar-Can Transportation Company's withdrawal liability by $1.8 million. The decision interprets an ambiguous ERISA provision regarding the transfer of unfunded vested benefits when employees switch unions.
Bugliotti v. Argentina - Bondholders Sue for Defaulted Sovereign Bond Payments
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals partially affirmed and partially vacated a district court's dismissal of a case where bondholders sued the Republic of Argentina for defaulted sovereign bond payments. The court found that some of the bondholders' claims are timely under New York law and that they now have the authority under Argentine law to sue.
OFAC Adds Sudanese Muslim Brotherhood to SDN List
The US Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has added the Sudanese Muslim Brotherhood to its Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) List. This action imposes sanctions on the entity and carries secondary sanctions risk under Executive Order 13224, as amended.
State v. Freed - Plea Withdrawal Denial
The Ohio Court of Appeals reversed a trial court's decision to deny a defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea without a hearing. The appellate court found that the trial court abused its discretion and remanded the case for further proceedings.
State v. Bingle - Theft and Attempted Extortion Convictions Upheld
The Ohio Court of Appeals upheld the theft and attempted extortion convictions of Ryan T. Bingle. The court ruled that the offenses were not allied offenses of similar import, affirming the trial court's decision. The case involved threats made to establish ongoing coerced property surrender.
State v. Runyon - Sentencing Notification Error
The Ohio Court of Appeals found reversible error in the sentencing notification provided to the defendant in State v. Runyon. The court remanded the case for resentencing specifically to provide the defendant with mandatory statutory notifications regarding the indefinite nature of his sentence.
Anderson v. Bonnema - Ohio Court of Appeals Opinion
The Ohio Court of Appeals reversed and remanded a lower court's decision in Anderson v. Bonnema. The appellate court found that the trial court erred in dismissing the case with prejudice based on res judicata. The case involves a pro se appellant challenging the dismissal of his complaint.
State v. Griffis - Ohio Court of Appeals Opinion
The Ohio Court of Appeals, Twelfth Appellate District, has issued a decision in State v. Griffis. The court granted the motion of appellant's counsel to withdraw and dismissed the appeal as wholly frivolous, finding no prejudicial error in the trial court proceedings.
American Express Natl. Bank v. Jenkins - Civ.R. 60(B) Relief Denial
The Ohio Court of Appeals denied a motion for relief from judgment under Civ.R. 60(B) based on standing grounds. The court found that the original credit card issuer demonstrated standing and that the debtor's challenge constituted an improper collateral attack on the judgment.
State v. Myers - Consecutive Sentences Upheld
The Ohio Court of Appeals upheld consecutive sentences imposed on Cory Thomas Myers, finding the trial court made the necessary findings under R.C. 2929.14(C)(4). The decision affirms the trial court's sentencing in two consolidated cases involving charges of gross sexual imposition, endangering children, and disseminating matter harmful to juveniles.
State v. Upkins - Drug Possession and Fair Trial Appeal
The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a defendant's drug possession convictions in State v. Upkins. The court found the convictions were not against the manifest weight of the evidence and that any prosecutorial misconduct did not constitute plain error. The defendant also failed to demonstrate ineffective assistance of counsel.
State v. Burch - Aggravated Arson Sentence Affirmed
The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions and aggravated arson sentence of Michael Troy Burch. The court held that the trial court was not required to advise the defendant on potential sentence mergers and that the aggravated arson charges did not merge due to the risk to multiple victims. The amended sentencing order was deemed a permissible correction of a typographical error.
DEC Announces 2026 Exam Dates for Wildlife Licenses
The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) has announced the 2026 online examination dates for individuals seeking licenses for falconry, wildlife rehabilitation, and leashed tracking dog handling. These exams will be offered online and free of charge to enhance accessibility for applicants.
State AGs Continue Live Nation Antitrust Case
A coalition of State Attorneys General, led by Colorado AG Phil Weiser, has announced their intention to continue pursuing their antitrust case against Live Nation and Ticketmaster. The states believe the recent settlement with the Department of Justice does not adequately address the harms caused by Live Nation's alleged monopolization of the live music industry.
Reliance Health and Home Physician Services, Inc. v. Wesco Insurance Company - Discretionary Application Denied
The Court of Appeals of Georgia denied a discretionary application in the case of Reliance Health and Home Physician Services, Inc. v. Wesco Insurance Company. The docket number for this case is A26D0348. This denial means the appellate court will not hear further arguments on the matter.
State v. Nikolai Chea - Interlocutory Application Dismissed
The Georgia Court of Appeals dismissed the State's interlocutory application to appeal an order suppressing identification evidence against Nikolai Chea. The dismissal was due to the State's failure to meet statutory requirements for such appeals, including timely filing and certification.
M.B. v. Henry County Board of Education - Opinion Vacated and Remanded
The Court of Appeals of Georgia vacated and remanded a lower court's decision regarding a student disciplinary hearing for M. B. v. Henry County Board of Education. The court directed review by the Local Board concerning the timeliness of the disciplinary hearing under OCGA § 20-2-754 (b) (2).
Joseph P. Durham, Jr. v. Brandon Classon - Case Dismissed
The Court of Appeals of Georgia dismissed the case Joseph P. Durham, Jr. v. Brandon Classon due to the appellant's failure to comply with docketing notices and court rules regarding the filing of an enumeration of errors and brief. The appeal is deemed abandoned.
Martin Canty v. State - Case Dismissed
The Court of Appeals of Georgia dismissed the appeal of Martin Canty, who was convicted in 2008 of aggravated sexual battery and child molestation. The dismissal was due to the appellant failing to file a brief and enumeration of errors after his sentence was amended.
Maki v. State - Criminal Law
The Wyoming Supreme Court reversed a district court's decision denying a deferred sentence to Aaron R. Maki. The court found that a prior deferred sentence for a misdemeanor did not disqualify Maki from receiving a second deferred sentence for felony charges. The case is remanded for resentencing.
Parmarthi et al v. United States Citizenship And Immigration Services - Immigration Mandamus
A new civil case, Parmarthi et al v. United States Citizenship And Immigration Services, was filed on March 6, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves 'Other Immigration Actions' and names USCIS and other government officials as defendants. A procedural order for an immigration mandamus case was also filed.
Texas man sentenced to 90 months for $59.9M Medicare fraud conspiracy
Texas man sentenced to 90 months for $59.9M Medicare fraud conspiracy
Waites v. Rosalind Franklin University - ERISA Removal
The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois denied a motion to remand a case to state court. The court found that the plaintiff's claim was preempted by ERISA, allowing the case to remain in federal court. The decision addresses the scope of ERISA preemption in employee benefit disputes.
Marrero v. Acosta, Taylor, Westchester Police - False Arrest and Malicious Prosecution
This document is an opinion and order from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in the case of Nelson Marrero v. Emanuel Acosta et al. The plaintiff alleges false arrest, malicious prosecution, and conspiracy against law enforcement officers and the City of Westchester.
GAO: State Department Needs Plans for Overseas Antidemocratic Actions
The GAO released a report recommending that the State Department develop plans to mitigate risks associated with democracy assistance programs that may need to be redirected away from host-country government entities. The report highlights challenges faced in providing aid and notes that current planning does not adequately address potential shifts in assistance due to antidemocratic actions by recipient governments.
GAO Report on Dental and Vision Insurance Market Concentration
A GAO report released on March 9, 2026, examines market concentration in the dental and vision insurance sectors across US states. The report indicates that market concentration varies by state and notes limited research on the effects of concentration and vertical integration in these markets.
Summit General Contractors Enforcement Action Proposed
The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality has proposed an enforcement action against Summit General Contractors, Inc. for alleged violations of the State Water Control Law at the Dollar Tree facility in Isle of Wight County. A comment period for the proposed Consent Order is open from March 9, 2026, to April 8, 2026.
Royall Pump and Well Company Enforcement Action
The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality has proposed an enforcement action against Royall Pump and Well Company, Inc. for alleged violations of state water control statutes, regulations, and permit requirements related to a project in Powhatan County. A comment period is open from March 9, 2026, to April 8, 2026.
City of Hopewell Enforcement Action Proposed Consent Order
The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) has proposed an enforcement action against the City of Hopewell for violations of water quality statutes and regulations at its Water Renewal facility. A public comment period is open from March 9, 2026, to April 8, 2026.
City of Richmond Proposed Consent Order for Water Violations
The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality is proposing a Consent Order for the City of Richmond concerning violations of water statutes and permit requirements at the Richmond WWTP facility. A public comment period is open from March 9, 2026, to April 8, 2026.
Presidential Message on 61st Anniversary of Selma Marches
The White House issued a presidential message commemorating the 61st anniversary of the Selma Marches. The message reflects on the historical significance of the marches for voting rights and highlights the administration's current efforts to safeguard elections.
Care One LLC v NLRB - Court Opinion
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's denial of a preliminary injunction sought by Care One LLC and its affiliates. The healthcare companies sought to halt NLRB proceedings, arguing the ALJ was unlawfully appointed and shielded from removal. The appellate court found the companies could not demonstrate irreparable harm.
United States v. Aryeetey - Criminal Conviction and Sentence Appeal
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction and sentence of Ivan Joel Aryeetey for being a felon in possession of a firearm. The court found Aryeetey's arguments regarding DNA evidence disclosure and sentence reasonableness to be unpersuasive.
Broadcast Music, Inc. v. North American Concert Promoters Association - Antitrust
The Second Circuit vacated a district court's decision regarding music licensing fees set by Broadcast Music, Inc. (BMI) for the North American Concert Promoters Association (NACPA). The court found the imposed rates and expanded definition of gross revenues to be unreasonable, remanding the case for further proceedings.
McGucken v. Shutterstock, Inc. - Copyright Infringement Appeal
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals partially affirmed and partially vacated a district court's summary judgment in McGucken v. Shutterstock, Inc. The court affirmed the dismissal of the false copyright management information claim but vacated the dismissal of copyright infringement claims, remanding for further proceedings on specific factual issues.
B.B. v. Hochul - Children's Rights in Foster Care Certification
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in B.B. v. Hochul that plaintiffs, children removed from their parents, have standing to challenge New York's certification scheme for foster parents. The court reversed in part and affirmed in part the district court's dismissal, remanding for further proceedings.
Reidy Contracting Group LLC v. Mt. Hawley Insurance Company - Insurance Coverage Dispute
The Second Circuit affirmed a lower court ruling that Mt. Hawley Insurance Company must provide additional insured coverage to Reidy Contracting Group LLC. The court held that Reidy was an additional insured and that the Employers Liability Exclusion was ambiguous and thus construed against Mt. Hawley.
SBK ART LLC v. Akin Gump - Discovery for Foreign Litigation
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's order granting SBK ART LLC's petition for discovery in aid of foreign litigation under 28 U.S.C. §1782. The court found that the district court did not abuse its discretion in allowing discovery from Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, even though the documents might not be discoverable from the foreign client.
CFHC v. CoreLogic Rental Property Solutions - Fair Housing Act Case
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in CFHC v. CoreLogic Rental Property Solutions, vacating in part, affirming in part, and reversing in part a lower court decision. The court found the Connecticut Fair Housing Center lacked standing and that CoreLogic did not cause housing denials based on criminal history, thus failing the disparate impact claim under the Fair Housing Act. However, it affirmed CoreLogic violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act regarding conservatorship documentation.
Mar-Can Transport Co. v. Local 854 Pension Fund - ERISA Withdrawal Liability
The Second Circuit affirmed a lower court ruling that Mar-Can Transport Co. is entitled to a $1.8 million reduction in withdrawal liability from the Local 854 Pension Fund. The decision clarifies the interpretation of an ERISA provision regarding asset and liability transfers when an employer withdraws from a multiemployer pension plan due to union representation changes.
US v. Cardenas - Cocaine Import Conspiracy Conviction Vacated
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated the conviction of Jey James Roldan Cardenas for conspiracy to import cocaine. The court found that the district court erred in excluding evidence relevant to Cardenas's defense of lacking criminal intent, remanding the case for further proceedings.
US v. Jimenez - Appeal of Sentence Conditions
The Second Circuit affirmed a district court's sentencing of William Jimenez to 105 months imprisonment and three years of supervised release. Jimenez appealed three special conditions of his supervised release, but the court found they were adequately supported and that his appeal waiver barred his challenge to the imprisonment term.
Peña Garcia v. Department of Labor - Workers' Compensation
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals denied a petition for review in Peña Garcia v. Department of Labor. The court affirmed the denial of reimbursement for medical cannabis edibles under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act, citing the Controlled Substances Act.
Kellogg v. Nichols - Concealed Carry Licenses, New York
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of a lawsuit challenging New York's concealed carry license laws. The court held that state judges reviewing license applications are protected by absolute judicial immunity and that federal courts lack jurisdiction for injunctive relief claims against them.
Safdieh v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue - Tax Penalties
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a Tax Court decision, holding that the Commissioner of Internal Revenue may assess penalties for failure to report foreign business control. The court vacated the Tax Court's order granting summary judgment to the taxpayer, Joseph Safdieh, and remanded the case for further proceedings.
Felts Field Development LLC v. Aero Center Felts Field LLC - Motion for Summary Judgment
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington denied a motion for partial summary judgment filed by Defendant Aero Center Felts Field LLC in the case Felts Field Development LLC v. Aero Center Felts Field LLC. The case involves allegations of unlawful detainer and contract disputes regarding a sublease agreement.
Anthony Mills v. Arlene Bluth - Case Dismissal
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington dismissed the case of Anthony Mills v. Arlene Bluth, citing frivolousness and judicial immunity. The plaintiff had filed identical complaints in multiple federal districts.
Tammy F. v. Frank Bisignano - Social Security Disability Appeal
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington issued an order in the case of Tammy F. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security. The court granted in part the Plaintiff's motion and granted the Defendant's motion, remanding the matter to the Commissioner for additional proceedings.
Gonzales-Chavac - Pretrial Detention Motion
The US District Court for the Northern District of California has filed a Memorandum in Support of Motion for Pretrial Detention for Isaac Kebin Gonzales-Chavac. The case, bearing number 3:26-cr-00088-CRB-1, involves criminal proceedings. The motion was filed on March 9, 2026.
Tittl v. Meta Platforms Inc. et al - Class Action Complaint
A class action complaint has been filed against Meta Platforms Inc. and Luxottica of America, Inc. The case, Tittl v. Meta Platforms Inc. et al, was filed on March 8, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The nature of the suit is listed as Other Fraud.
MESCHI et al v. Edlow - Other Immigration Actions
A new civil case, MESCHI et al v. Edlow, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on March 8, 2026. The case involves 'Other Immigration Actions' and names Joseph B. Edlow as a defendant. The filing fee was $405.
Nguyen v. Citibank, N.A. - Civil Case Filing
A new civil case, Nguyen v. Citibank, N.A., was filed on February 26, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Recent filings include an amended complaint and a demand for a jury trial.