United States — March 11, 2026

Texas Workforce Commission Wins National Reemployment Award

The Texas Workforce Commission (TWC) received the 2025 Full Employment Award from the American Institute for Full Employment for its Reemployment Services and Eligibility Assessment (RESEA) program. The award recognizes TWC's innovative use of AI-powered job readiness tools and personalized coaching to help unemployment insurance claimants return to work faster.

DOJ Appoints 42 New Immigration Judges

The Department of Justice's Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) announced the appointment of 42 new immigration judges across 16 states. These appointments are part of an effort to reduce the immigration court backlog, which has seen over 380,000 cases resolved since January 20, 2025.

People v. Hoyt - California Court of Appeal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal has issued a non-precedential opinion in the case of People v. Hoyt. The case is identified by docket number A172097. No known citations or subsequent citing cases are currently available.

People v. Itehua - California Court of Appeal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal has issued a non-precedential opinion in the case of People v. Itehua. The docket number for this case is B338674. This filing represents a new entry in the court's record.

People v. Nguyen - California Court of Appeal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal has issued a non-precedential opinion in the case of People v. Nguyen. The docket number for this case is A172536. This document represents a standard judicial filing.

People v. Costa CA3 - Criminal Appeal

The California Court of Appeal has issued an opinion in the case of People v. Costa. The docket number is C102798. This is a non-precedential opinion.

People v. Sands - Non-Precedential Opinion

The California Court of Appeal filed a non-precedential opinion in People v. Sands, concerning a defendant's eligibility for a youth offender parole hearing. The court affirmed the trial court's denial of the defendant's motion, citing existing case law and statutory ineligibility for those sentenced to life without parole.

In re N.R. - California Court of Appeal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal has issued a non-precedential opinion in the case In re N.R. The docket number for this case is B337391. This document represents a standard court filing.

People v. Gonzalez - California Court of Appeal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal has issued a non-precedential opinion in the case of People v. Gonzalez, docket number F088497. This document is a court filing and does not establish new regulatory requirements.

In re K.W. - Juvenile Dependency Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, Fifth Appellate District, filed a non-precedential opinion in the case of In re K.W. The appeal concerns the continuation of dependency jurisdiction and family maintenance services for a minor. The court affirmed the juvenile court's order.

People v. Clarke - Criminal Appeal

The California Court of Appeal modified a judgment in the case of People v. Clarke. The court amended the judgment to reflect the dismissal of two counts (unlawful possession of ammunition by a felon and public intoxication) as agreed upon in a prior plea agreement, aligning the official record with the terms of the negotiated settlement.

Yan v. City of Diamond Bar - California Court of Appeal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal has issued an opinion in the case of Yan v. City of Diamond Bar. The docket number for this case is B339583. This is a standard appellate court filing.

In re M.G. - Juvenile Guardianship and ICWA Inquiry

The California Court of Appeal conditionally reversed and remanded a juvenile guardianship case concerning M.G. The court agreed with the mother that the Department of Human Services failed to conduct a proper inquiry under the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA). The case involves challenges to denial of relative placement and ICWA compliance.

B.S. v. C.V. - Domestic Violence Restraining Order Appeal

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a domestic violence restraining order against C.V. C.V. appealed the trial court's decision, arguing insufficient evidence and erroneous exclusion of rebuttal evidence. The appellate court presumed sufficient evidence supported the order due to the absence of a reporter's transcript.

People v. Price - Criminal Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, filed an opinion in the case of People v. Price. The court affirmed the judgment but remanded the matter for correction of the abstract of judgment. The opinion is not certified for publication.

People v. Ibarra - Non-Precedential Opinion

The California Court of Appeal, Fifth Appellate District, filed a non-precedential opinion in the case of People v. Ibarra. The court affirmed the judgment of the Superior Court of Stanislaus County after finding no arguable error on appeal.

People v. Salinas - Criminal Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division 8, has issued a non-precedential opinion in the case of People v. Salinas. The docket number for this case is B344478. No specific compliance actions or penalties are detailed in the provided information.

People v. Vasquez - Criminal Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, Sixth Appellate District, filed a non-precedential opinion in the case of People v. Vasquez. The court conducted an independent review of the record and found no arguable issues on appeal for the defendant, Javier Vasquez, who had pleaded no contest to second degree burglary and admitted to violating postrelease community supervision.

People v. Grant - Court Opinion on Penal Code Section 1202.5 Fine

The California Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, filed an opinion in People v. Grant on March 11, 2026. The court agreed to strike a $41 fine imposed under Penal Code section 1202.5, as the conviction was not for a theft-related offense as required by the statute.

In re A.T. - California Court of Appeal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal, Third District, issued a non-precedential opinion in the case In re A.T. The opinion was filed on March 11, 2026, under docket number C103132. No external citations are currently known for this opinion.

In re Isaiah M. - California Court of Appeal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal has issued a non-precedential opinion in the case In re Isaiah M. The docket number for this case is E086984. This is a routine filing within the judicial system.

People v. Toca - California Court of Appeal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal has issued a non-precedential opinion in the case of People v. Toca. The docket number for this case is B336579. This filing represents a standard judicial proceeding.

Minnesota Supreme Court Opinion on Civil Commitment Treatment

The Minnesota Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's decision regarding the administration of involuntary intrusive treatments to civilly committed patients. The court held that the existing Price/Jarvis balancing test adequately addresses the statutory requirement for treatment necessary to preserve life or health.

Lockhart vs. Hennepin County - Tax Court Jurisdiction

The Minnesota Supreme Court affirmed the tax court's decision in Lockhart vs. Hennepin County, ruling that the tax court had subject matter jurisdiction over property tax assessment disputes. The court found that the taxpayer's claims fell within the scope of Minnesota Statutes section 278.01, which provides the exclusive remedy for such matters.

CT Dept of Banking Removes Administrative Orders

The Connecticut Department of Banking has removed administrative orders for Set Forth, LLC and J. Davenport Advisors, LLC from its website. These removals indicate that the associated enforcement actions are concluded or no longer active on the public index.

Brandon Lamont French v. State of Indiana - Criminal Appeal

The Indiana Court of Appeals reversed Brandon Lamont French's convictions for Invasion of Privacy. The court found that the State did not present sufficient evidence to sustain the convictions. This decision impacts the specific case and may set precedent for similar evidentiary challenges in Indiana.

Damon D. Clark v. First Merchants Bank - Foreclosure Appeal

The Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's grant of summary judgment to First Merchants Bank in a foreclosure action against Damon D. Clark. The court found that Clark waived his appeal issues by not presenting them to the trial court and that the bank established a prima facie case for foreclosure.

Roe v. United States of America - Civil Rights

A civil rights case, Roe v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons), was filed on March 11, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The filing includes a complaint and proposed summons. The case is assigned docket number 4:26-cv-02115.

Lower Duwamish Waterway Cleanup Public Comment Periods

The Washington State Department of Ecology has opened three public comment periods related to the Lower Duwamish Waterway cleanup. These periods cover the Jorgensen Forge site, the South Park Marina site, and a new consent decree for the overall waterway cleanup, with comment periods running through April 22, 2026.

CPUC Consumer Services Supervisor Profile: Heather Dunham

The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) published a profile of Heather Dunham, Consumer Services Supervisor in Los Angeles. The article highlights her role in managing consumer complaints regarding utility services and her efforts in staff training and de-escalation.

State AGs Oppose Trump Administration's No-Bond Immigration Detention Policy

California Attorney General Rob Bonta, joined by 10 other State Attorneys General, filed an amicus brief opposing the Trump Administration's "no-bond" immigration detention policy. The brief argues the policy violates due process and federal statutes by mandating indefinite detention without bond hearings for certain non-citizens.

New Jersey v. Hakeem Maloney - Non-Precedential Opinion

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division issued a non-precedential opinion affirming the denial of post-conviction relief for Hakeem Maloney. The court addressed claims of ineffective assistance of counsel related to expert reports and the right to testify.

In the Matter of Police Chief, Paterson - Civil Service Appeal

The New Jersey Superior Court affirmed a Civil Service Commission decision denying the City of Paterson's request to convert the Police Chief title to unclassified service. The court found the City's argument misplaced based on statutory requirements for first-class cities operating under a specific form of government.

George Haffert v. Bell Tower Condominium Association Opinion

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division issued a non-precedential opinion in George Haffert v. Bell Tower Condominium Association. The court affirmed two trial court orders but vacated and remanded one order concerning a dispute over a settlement agreement and related fees.

Law Offices of Gary S. Park, Pc v. Sung H. Jang - Appeal of Sanctions Denial

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed a lower court's decision denying a motion for sanctions against a plaintiff. The case involves a dispute between a law firm and a former associate who left to start her own practice, leading to allegations of breach of fiduciary duty and tortious interference.

B&L Tire Service v. New Jersey Turnpike Authority - Prequalification Protest

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division reversed and remanded a decision by the New Jersey Turnpike Authority that rescinded Noll Brothers Inc.'s prequalification status for towing services. The court found the Authority's decision was not supported by substantial evidence in the record.

McDermott v. City of Plainfield - Civil Appeal

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed a lower court's order granting summary judgment to the City of Plainfield in a civil appeal filed by Karen McDermott. The case involved an incident during an electrical inspection.

Dechert v. Totowa Board of Education - Employment Dispute

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed a lower court's decision granting summary judgment to the Totowa Board of Education in a case brought by employee Stacie Dechert. The court found the opinion non-precedential.

State of New Jersey v. Donqua Thomas - Criminal Appeal

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed the conviction of Donqua Thomas for first-degree murder and related weapons offenses. The court's decision, issued on March 11, 2026, upholds the jury's verdict from June 2023.

Toca Madera Scottsdale LLC v Madera Group Investments LLC - Civil Appeal

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed an order quashing a subpoena in the case of Toca Madera Scottsdale, LLC v. Madera Group Investments, LLC. The court's decision pertains to a civil dispute originating from alleged unauthorized stock transfers.

GEICO v. Mayzenberg - Insurance No-Fault Benefits Dispute

The Second Circuit vacated a district court judgment in favor of GEICO, remanding the case of GEICO v. Mayzenberg. The court's decision was based on a certified question answered by the New York Court of Appeals, which clarified that an insurer cannot deny no-fault benefits based solely on alleged professional misconduct not amounting to ceding control of a professional services corporation to an unlicensed party.

SBK ART LLC v Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP - Discovery for Foreign Litigation

The Second Circuit affirmed a district court's order granting SBK ART LLC's petition for discovery in aid of foreign litigation under 28 U.S.C. §1782. The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in allowing discovery from Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, even though the documents might not be discoverable from the firm's client abroad.

Kellogg v. Nichols - Concealed Carry License Case

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals amended its opinion in Kellogg v. Nichols, a case concerning New York's concealed carry license laws. The court affirmed the dismissal of claims against a state court judge, upholding judicial immunity and federal jurisdiction requirements.

B.B. v. Hochul - Due Process Rights of Foster Children

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed in part and affirmed in part a district court's decision in B.B. v. Hochul. The court found that fourteen foster children have standing to sue New York over its certification scheme for relative foster parents, which they allege violates their due process rights. The case is remanded for further proceedings.

CFHC v. CoreLogic Rental Property Solutions - Fair Housing Act and FCRA Case

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated in part, affirmed in part, and reversed in part a district court decision concerning CoreLogic Rental Property Solutions. The court found the Connecticut Fair Housing Center lacked standing and that CoreLogic did not cause housing denials under the Fair Housing Act, while also addressing a Fair Credit Reporting Act claim related to conservatorship documentation.

Care One LLC v NLRB - Unfair Labor Practice Proceedings

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's denial of a preliminary injunction sought by Care One LLC and affiliated healthcare facilities. The facilities challenged NLRB proceedings, arguing the ALJ was improperly appointed due to a lack of quorum. The court found the plaintiffs could not demonstrate irreparable harm, thus affirming the denial of the injunction.

Reidy Contracting Group v. Mt. Hawley Insurance - Insurance Coverage Dispute

The Second Circuit affirmed a district court's decision in favor of Reidy Contracting Group, LLC, holding that Mt. Hawley Insurance Company must provide additional insured coverage. The court found Reidy to be an additional insured and construed an ambiguous Employers Liability Exclusion against Mt. Hawley.

Mar-Can Transport Co. v. Local 854 Pension Fund - ERISA Withdrawal Liability

The Second Circuit affirmed a District Court ruling that Mar-Can Transportation Company is entitled to a $1.8 million reduction in its ERISA withdrawal liability. The court interpreted a key ERISA provision regarding the transfer of unfunded vested benefits when employees switch unions.

US v. Cardenas - Court of Appeals Decision

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the conviction of Jey James Roldan Cardenas for conspiracy to import cocaine. The court found that the district court erred in excluding evidence relevant to Cardenas's defense of lacking criminal intent. The case is remanded for further proceedings.

US v. Jimenez - 105 Months Prison for Ammunition Possession

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's judgment sentencing William Jimenez to 105 months imprisonment for felony ammunition possession. The court upheld the special conditions of supervised release, including electronic device searches and mental health counseling.

Safdieh v. Commissioner - Tax Court Ruling on Penalty Assessment

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Commissioner of Internal Revenue may assess penalties for failing to report control of a foreign business under I.R.C. § 6038(b). The court vacated a Tax Court order that had prevented the Commissioner from collecting $50,000 in penalties against Joseph Safdieh through administrative assessment.

US v Aryeetey - Conviction Appeal Affirmation

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction and sentence of Ivanjoel Aryeetey for being a felon in possession of a firearm. The court found no abuse of discretion in the admission of DNA evidence and deemed the sentence substantively reasonable.

Peña Garcia v. Department of Labor - Workers' Compensation

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals denied a petition for review in Peña Garcia v. Department of Labor. The court affirmed the denial of reimbursement for medical cannabis-infused edibles under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act, citing the Controlled Substances Act.

Miller v. Lamanna - Appeal of Dismissal

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a district court's dismissal of a former corrections officer's discrimination and retaliation claims. The appellate court found the district court improperly converted a summary judgment motion into a dismissal motion, remanding the case for further proceedings.

Bondholders v. Republic of Argentina - Sovereign Bond Default Litigation

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals partially affirmed and vacated a lower court's decision in a case where bondholders sued the Republic of Argentina over defaulted sovereign bonds. The court found that some of the bondholders' claims are timely and that they now have the authority under Argentine law to sue, remanding the case for further proceedings.

Sacaza v. City of New York - Qualified Immunity Appeal

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a lower court's denial of summary judgment for a New York City detective in a false arrest and malicious prosecution case. The court found that the detective had arguable probable cause, granting him qualified immunity on federal claims.

Broadcast Music, Inc. v. North American Concert Promoters Association - Antitrust

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a district court's decision regarding music licensing fees set by Broadcast Music, Inc. (BMI) for the North American Concert Promoters Association (NACPA). The court found the imposed rates and expanded definition of gross revenues to be unreasonable, remanding the case for further proceedings.

Rockefeller Photos LLC v. Guerra Quality Meats Inc - Copyright Infringement

Rockefeller Photos LLC has filed a copyright infringement complaint against Guerra Quality Meats Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case was filed on March 11, 2026, with a filing fee of $405.

NY AG and NYPD Announce Takedown of Stolen Vehicle Ring

New York Attorney General Letitia James and NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch announced the takedown of a multistate stolen vehicle ring. Five individuals were charged with 92 crimes for their roles in selling over 40 stolen cars valued at more than $1 million across New York and New Jersey.

ICE Lodges Immigration Detainer Against Alien Accused of Murder

ICE has lodged an immigration detainer against Samuel Antonio Maldonado-Erazo, an illegal alien accused of violently abusing and murdering his three-year-old nephew. Maldonado-Erazo was arrested in Florida and ICE intends to remove him upon his release from local custody.

Certain Monomers and Oligomers from Taiwan: Antidumping and Countervailing Duties

The International Trade Administration has issued a notice regarding antidumping and countervailing duty orders on certain monomers and oligomers from Taiwan. This action establishes duties on these imported products, impacting international trade and domestic industries.

Unwrought Palladium from Russia - Preliminary Countervailing Duty Determination

The Department of Commerce has issued a preliminary affirmative determination that unwrought palladium from the Russian Federation is being subsidized. This notice initiates the next phase of the countervailing duty investigation, which could lead to the imposition of duties on imports.

Opaque Polymers: Rescission Proceeding and Remedial Orders Terminated

The International Trade Commission has terminated the rescission proceeding and rescinded remedial orders concerning certain opaque polymers, as per Investigation No. 337-TA-883. This action follows a notice published on March 11, 2026.

Extension of Import Restrictions on Colombian Material

U.S. Customs and Border Protection has extended import restrictions on certain archaeological, ecclesiastical, and ethnological material from Colombia. This rule, published in the Federal Register, continues existing import limitations to protect cultural heritage.

Polypropylene Corrugated Boxes from China Determinations

The International Trade Commission has issued a notice regarding final determinations on polypropylene corrugated boxes from China. This notice is part of investigations numbered 701-TA-757 and 731-TA-1737.

Chlorinated Isocyanurates from China: Final Antidumping Duty Results

The International Trade Administration has published the final results of the antidumping duty administrative review for chlorinated isocyanurates from the People's Republic of China for the 2023-2024 period. This notice details the final determination of dumping margins.

In re E.M.S. and J.D.S. - Suit Affecting Parent Child Relationship

The Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District, dismissed the appeal in the case of In the Interest of E.M.S. and J.D.S., Children v. the State of Texas. The dismissal was granted upon the appellant's motion to voluntarily withdraw the appeal.

David Roy Mundt v. the State of Texas - Aggravated Sexual Assault Conviction

The Texas Court of Appeals modified and affirmed the aggravated sexual assault conviction of David Roy Mundt. The court found no error in the denial of the motion to suppress and sufficient evidence for the conviction but corrected the trial court's error in stacking life sentences, ordering them to run concurrently.

Jerome B. Price v. State of Texas - Assault Case Dismissed

The Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District, has dismissed the appeal in Jerome B. Price v. State of Texas. The dismissal was granted upon the appellant's motion, signed by both the appellant and his counsel, in accordance with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Stephen Alan King v. State of Texas - Injury to Child

The Texas Court of Appeals affirmed a conviction against Stephen Alan King for knowingly causing serious bodily injury by omission to his daughter. The court found sufficient evidence to support the jury's verdict of a first-degree felony offense, resulting in a twenty-year prison sentence.

PVF Industrial Supply v. State of Texas - Mandamus Conditionally Granted

The Texas Court of Appeals conditionally granted a writ of mandamus in favor of PVF Industrial Supply, Inc. The court found that PVF's motion to designate UPS as a responsible third party in a personal injury lawsuit should have been granted. The case involves a personal injury lawsuit stemming from a truck accident.

Drivestream Data Breach Notification

Drivestream, Inc. is notifying Washington residents of a data breach that occurred between December 4-9, 2024. An unauthorized actor accessed systems and potentially exfiltrated sensitive personal information, affecting 505 Washington residents. Drivestream is offering credit monitoring services.

Pyramid Global Hospitality Data Breach Notification

Pyramid Global Hospitality is notifying current and former employees of a data breach discovered on September 30, 2025, impacting personal information. The company is offering credit monitoring and identity restoration services and has notified relevant state regulators and federal law enforcement.

Data Breach Notification for CommonSpirit Health and Pinnacle Holdings

Washington State's Office of the Attorney General has been notified of a data breach impacting CommonSpirit Health, reported by vendor Northgauge Healthcare Advisors. The breach occurred at Pinnacle Holdings, a vendor to Northgauge, and may have exposed personal information of Washington residents.

Lakeside Pediatrics Data Breach Notification

Lakeside Pediatric & Adolescent Medicine PLLC is notifying 1314 Washingtonians of a data security incident that occurred on or about November 1, 2024. An unauthorized party accessed their systems, potentially exposing personal information. The company is offering credit monitoring services.

Brown Advisory Security Incident and Data Breach Notification

Brown Advisory reported a security incident on January 21, 2026, involving unauthorized access to certain systems by a threat actor. Personal data, including names, contact information, and sensitive identification details, may have been accessed. The company is offering 24 months of free identity protection services from Experian.

New American Funding Data Breach Notification

New American Funding has notified the Washington Attorney General's office of a data breach affecting 699 state residents. The incident, which occurred at a service provider, may have exposed personal information including names, addresses, and Social Security numbers. Affected individuals are being notified and offered credit monitoring services.

Insightin Health Data Breach Notification

Insightin Health is notifying Washington residents and regulators of a data breach affecting 11,740 individuals due to a cyberattack exploiting a zero-day vulnerability. The breach, which occurred in September 2025, potentially exposed names, dates of birth, medical, and health insurance information. Insightin is offering 12 months of free credit monitoring services.

Com. v. Babaev, A - Criminal Opinion

The Pennsylvania Superior Court has issued a non-precedential opinion in the case of Com. v. Babaev, A. The opinion, docketed under 2127 EDA 2025, was issued on March 11, 2026. No specific compliance actions or penalties are detailed in this summary.

Com. v. Babadzhanov, A. - Superior Court of Pennsylvania Opinion

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued a non-precedential opinion in the case of Commonwealth v. Babadzhanov, A. The case is identified by docket number 997 MDA 2025. This is a routine judicial filing.

Com. v. Hunter, N. - Non-Precedential Opinion

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued a non-precedential opinion in the case of Com. v. Hunter, N. The case is identified by docket number 566 WDA 2025. This document represents a routine court filing.

Duffield v. Legend Spine - Legal Opinion

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued a non-precedential legal opinion in the case of Duffield v. Legend Spine. The opinion was authored by Judge Jack A. Panella and assigned docket number 3023 EDA 2024. This is a standard court filing.

Com. v. Campbell, S. - Criminal Case Opinion

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued a non-precedential legal opinion in the criminal case Com. v. Campbell, S., with docket number 2834 EDA 2024. The opinion was issued on March 11, 2026.

Com. v. Fratangeli, D. - Criminal Case

The Pennsylvania Superior Court has issued a non-precedential opinion in the criminal case Com. v. Fratangeli, D. The case is identified by docket number 508 EDA 2025. This opinion does not appear to set new legal precedent.

Com. v. Baynard - Superior Court of Pennsylvania Opinion

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania has issued a non-precedential opinion in the case of Com. v. Baynard, with docket number 605 EDA 2025. This document represents a standard court filing and does not introduce new regulatory requirements.

Com. v. Wasser, P. - Criminal Case

The Pennsylvania Superior Court has issued a non-precedential opinion in the criminal case Com. v. Wasser, P. The case is identified by docket number 279 MDA 2025. This opinion does not appear to set new legal precedent.

Com. v. Leisure, J., II - Non-Precedential Opinion

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania has issued a non-precedential opinion in the case of Com. v. Leisure, J., II. The opinion is associated with docket number 874 MDA 2025 and was issued on March 11, 2026. This document represents a standard court filing.

Com. v. Bailey, S. - Criminal Opinion

The Pennsylvania Superior Court has issued a non-precedential opinion in the case of Com. v. Bailey, S. The opinion, docketed under number 2908 EDA 2024, was issued on March 11, 2026. This is a standard judicial filing.

Com. v. Wright, T. - Criminal Appeal

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania has issued a non-precedential legal opinion in the case of Commonwealth v. Wright, T. The opinion is associated with docket number 2841 EDA 2024. This document represents a standard judicial proceeding.

FAA Amendment of VOR Federal Airways Near Muncie, Indiana

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is amending Federal airways V-14, V-192, V-210, and V-221 in the vicinity of Muncie, Indiana. This rule affects airspace designations and will become effective on May 14, 2026.

Andre J. Twitty v. United States of America - Complaint Dismissal

The U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado dismissed a complaint filed by Andre J. Twitty due to non-compliance with prior filing restrictions. The court outlined specific requirements for Twitty to file future pro se actions, referencing previous orders and sanctions.

State AGs Sue Dept of Education Over Data Demand

A coalition of 17 State Attorneys General, led by Washington AG Nick Brown, has sued the U.S. Department of Education over new data collection requirements for colleges and universities. The lawsuit alleges the demand for race and sex-disaggregated admissions and outcomes data violates federal law and student privacy, and was implemented unlawfully.

Lemasters v. Equifax Information Services LLC et al - Consumer Credit

A new civil case, Lemasters v. Equifax Information Services LLC et al, was filed on March 11, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, identified by docket number 5:26-cv-02096, alleges violations related to consumer credit.

Executive Order Combating Cybercrime, Fraud, and Predatory Schemes

President Trump issued an Executive Order to combat cybercrime, fraud, and predatory schemes targeting American citizens. The order directs federal agencies to enhance efforts in preventing, detecting, and responding to these threats, aiming to protect consumers and the financial system.

State v. Jay Gagliano - Criminal Appeal

The Wisconsin Courts have released an opinion for the criminal appeal case 2025AP000173-CR, State v. Jay Gagliano. The opinion was released on March 11, 2026, and is available in PDF format.

State v. Robert T. Eaton, Jr - Criminal Appeal

The Wisconsin Court of Appeals has released an opinion in the criminal case State v. Robert T. Eaton, Jr. The opinion is available in PDF format and is part of the official published reports.

Fond du Lac County v. Conor Alexander Noble - Appeal

The Wisconsin Courts have released an opinion for case 2025AP000811, Fond du Lac County v. Conor Alexander Noble. The opinion is dated March 11, 2026, and is available in PDF format.

NIDA Funding Opportunity PAR-24-298 Expires Early

The National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) has issued a notice announcing the immediate early expiration of the funding opportunity PAR-24-298, "Mechanism for Time-Sensitive Substance Use Research (R21 Clinical Trial Optional)". No further applications will be accepted under this announcement.

NEI Seeks Feedback for 2026-2031 Strategic Plan

The National Eye Institute (NEI) is requesting feedback for its 2026-2031 Strategic Plan, which will guide vision research priorities. The NEI is seeking input from the scientific community, health professionals, patient advocates, and the public.

State v. Padgelek - Criminal Case Opinion on Misdemeanors

The Ohio Court of Appeals issued an opinion in the criminal case State v. Padgelek, addressing misdemeanor sentences, guilty pleas, and statutory violations. The opinion, identified by citation 2026 Ohio 817 and docket number 25 BE 0046, provides guidance on sentencing procedures.

State v. Gray - Criminal Damaging Conviction Affirmed

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a defendant's conviction for criminal damaging, finding sufficient evidence supported the verdict. The court also upheld the trial court's restitution determination, stating evidentiary rules do not apply at sentencing.

Ohnstad v. Bruce & Mary Ann Erickson Found. - Summary Judgment, Service of Process

The Ohio Court of Appeals reversed a trial court's summary judgment, finding that the defendant trust waived its defense of lack of capacity by not asserting it in its answer. The court held that service on the trustee was sufficient within the statute of limitations period.

State v. Barrow - Child Endangerment Charges Dismissed

The Ohio Court of Appeals reversed a trial court's dismissal of child endangerment charges against Anthony Barrow. The appellate court ruled that a local ordinance was not preempted by state law, allowing charges related to firearm storage to proceed.

Walker v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. - Ohio Court Opinion

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's dismissal of a consumer's claims against JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. The claims included breach of implied contract, unjust enrichment, conversion, breach of fiduciary duty, and constructive fraud, all stemming from a denied credit card application. The court found no reasonable grounds for the appeal.

Adams v. Kline & Kavali Mechanical Contrs., L.L.C. - Employer Intentional Tort

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision granting summary judgment in a case involving an employer intentional tort claim. The court found no evidence to support the appellant's claim that the employer intended to injure the deceased employee.

In re S.P. - Parental Termination and Permanent Custody

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a juvenile court's decision to commit children to permanent custody of the Hamilton County Department of Job and Family Services. The mother failed to remedy issues that led to the children's removal and did not visit them for nearly three years.

State v. Thompkins - Restitution Order Affirmed

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's order requiring Carlos Thompkins to pay $6,341.43 in restitution. The court found no abuse of discretion in the restitution amount after a two-day hearing.

In Re Robert W. Ashcraft Trust - Appeal of Trustee Fees

The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's order denying a petition for attorney fees and costs in the matter of the Robert W. Ashcraft Trust. The appeal stemmed from a dispute over the distribution of trust assets and the removal of a trustee.

People of Michigan v. Julie Ann Zimmerman - Criminal Appeal

The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court judgment against Julie Ann Zimmerman, who was convicted of perjury and sentenced as a third-offense habitual offender. The court found sufficient evidence and rejected claims of ineffective counsel and improper character evidence.

People of Michigan v. Exzavier Lamar Lewis - Criminal Appeal

The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed in part and reversed in part the conviction of Exzavier Lamar Lewis. The court remanded the case for resentencing due to errors in scoring the sentencing guidelines. The decision impacts how criminal sentences are calculated in similar cases.

12five Capital LLC v. Img Marine LLC - Case Reversed and Remanded

The Michigan Court of Appeals reversed and remanded a lower court's decision in 12five Capital LLC v. Img Marine LLC. The appellate court found that the denial of IMG Marine LLC's motion to set aside a default judgment was based on procedural irregularities, specifically the plaintiff's failure to provide notice of the default and request for judgment.

In Re Gould Minors - Termination of Parental Rights Affirmed

The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's termination of parental rights for the minors JG1 and JG2. The decision cited ongoing conditions leading to adjudication and reasonable likelihood of harm if children were returned to the parents, based on substance abuse and neglect.

Detroit v. Silverstein - Affirmation of Lower Court Judgment

The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision in City of Detroit v. Brian Silverstein, ruling that the defendant's right to a speedy trial was not violated. The case involved charges stemming from a 2020 protest arrest.

Davis v. Baldini - Negligence Claim Appeal

The Michigan Court of Appeals reversed and remanded a trial court's order granting summary disposition in favor of the defendant in a negligence claim for noneconomic damages. The case involves a motor vehicle accident and issues related to insurance policy exclusions.

People of Michigan v. Omar Dontay Wilson - Affirmation of Conviction

The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's judgment against Omar Dontay Wilson. Wilson was convicted of felon in possession of a firearm and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony, and sentenced as a fourth-offense habitual offender. The court's decision upholds the prior sentencing and convictions.

Colby Taylor v. Kristyn Taylor - Divorce and Property Division

The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's judgment of divorce, addressing the division of the marital estate and specifically the disposition of a marital home. The court reviewed the parties' arguments regarding ownership and financial contributions to the property.

City of Detroit v. Lloyd Joseph Simpson Jr - Speedy Trial Affirmation

The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision, reversing a district court's dismissal of charges against Lloyd Joseph Simpson Jr. The case involved a defendant's claim of a violation of his right to a speedy trial.

Vhs of Michigan Inc v. Allstate Insurance Company - Insurance Dispute

The Michigan Court of Appeals vacated and remanded the case of Vhs of Michigan Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Company. The appellate court's decision concerns a dispute over payment for medical services rendered to a minor injured in a motor vehicle accident, potentially impacting how insurers handle claims exceeding statutory limits.

Sav-Time Inc v. Department of Treasury - Tax Dispute

The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision in favor of the Department of Treasury regarding a sales, use, and withholding tax audit of Sav-Time Inc. The court found that Sav-Time failed to properly itemize labor charges and provided inaccurate financial data for the years 2015-2018.

NIST Publication on Inefficient Cryocooler Compression

NIST published a study on March 10, 2026, detailing inefficiencies in low-frequency cryocoolers used in scientific research. The publication highlights that the compression process is a major source of energy loss, suggesting potential for significant electricity savings with improved compressor technology.

Lithium-ion Battery Fire Risk Analysis

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has published a technical note analyzing the risks associated with lithium-ion battery fires. The report provides data-driven estimates on the frequency of electric vehicle and structural fires involving these batteries, highlighting potential underestimations in current reporting.

Mask and Conner v. Arkansas Dept. of Human Services - Termination of Parental Rights

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed the termination of parental rights for Ashley Mask and Wyatt Conner to their daughter. The court found no arguable merit in the appeal and granted the motion to withdraw filed by Conner's counsel. This decision upholds the circuit court's ruling that termination was in the child's best interest.

Union Insurance Company v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company - Insurance Coverage Dispute

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's summary judgment in favor of Auto-Owners Insurance Company in a dispute between Union Insurance Company, Chuck Hamilton Construction, Inc., and Auto-Owners. The case involved an insurance coverage dispute stemming from construction defects alleged by homeowners.

Arkadelphia City Manager v. Beene - Court Opinion

The Arkansas Court of Appeals reviewed a lower court's denial of summary judgment for the City of Arkadelphia regarding governmental immunity. The court affirmed in part and reversed and remanded in part the decision concerning the City's claimed easement and trespass claims against the Beene family.

Centofante et al. v. Ferguson - Property Dispute Court Opinion

The Arkansas Court of Appeals reversed and remanded a lower court's dismissal of a property dispute case. The appellants, referred to as the 'Coalition,' argued the Pulaski County Circuit Court erred in finding it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction and in transferring the case. This is the second appeal in this ongoing litigation.

Karlowski v. Karlowski - Covenant Marriage Judicial Separation

The Arkansas Court of Appeals reviewed a covenant marriage judicial separation case, Patrick Karlowski v. Elizabeth Karlowski. The court affirmed in part and reversed and remanded in part the lower court's order concerning child custody, visitation, and a no-contact order.

Robert Hoffman, Jr. v. State of Arkansas - Criminal Appeal

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed a conviction for fleeing, reckless driving, and speeding. The appellant challenged the fleeing conviction, arguing insufficient evidence of intent. The court found sufficient evidence based on the totality of the circumstances presented.

Deno Dicamillo v. State of Arkansas - Criminal Appeal

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed a conviction for rape and sexual assault. The appellant argued that evidence of his failure to appear in court was improperly admitted. The court found the evidence relevant to show consciousness of guilt.

Vicentic v. Arkansas Alcoholic Beverage Control Board - License Revocation

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed the revocation of Green Springs Medical LLC's dispensary license. The court found that the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board's decision was supported by substantial evidence and followed lawful procedure, upholding the revocation of the license.

Jearl Shane Griffin v. State of Arkansas - Theft Conviction Appeal

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Jearl Shane Griffin for theft by receiving property. Griffin was sentenced to five years' probation and fined $7,000. The appeal challenged the sufficiency of the evidence.

Bollinger Farms v. Farm Credit Midsouth - Court of Appeals Opinion

The Arkansas Court of Appeals issued an opinion in Bollinger Farms v. Farm Credit Midsouth, reversing and remanding a lower court's order regarding attorneys' fees. The case involves a long-standing dispute between agricultural entities and their creditor.

Christa Craig v. State of Arkansas - Probation Revocation Appeal

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision to revoke Christa Craig's probation. Craig had appealed the revocation, arguing insufficient evidence. The court found the evidence sufficient to support the revocation based on alleged violations including failure to report and pay fees.

Jasmine Henson v. Arkansas Department of Human Services - Parental Rights Termination

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed an order terminating Jasmine Henson's parental rights to her three children. The court granted the counsel's motion to withdraw, finding no arguable merit in an appeal. The termination followed an emergency hold initiated due to allegations of child sexual abuse by the children's father and the mother's permitting of child abuse.

Golden Kinsey v. Anitra Ford - Order of Protection Appeal

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed an order of protection against Golden Kinsey, prohibiting contact with Anitra Ford for ten years and their minor daughter for six months. Kinsey appealed the order, arguing it was based on conduct outside Arkansas and that the findings of domestic abuse were erroneous.

Talley v. Johnson - Tort Immunity Appeal

The Arkansas Court of Appeals reversed a lower court's denial of a motion to dismiss filed by a police officer and the City of Jonesboro. The appeal concerned the officer's claim of tort immunity following a traffic accident. The court's decision impacts the scope of immunity for law enforcement actions.

Stanfield v. Arkansas Dept. Human Services - Parental Rights Termination

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed the termination of parental rights for Jeffery Stanfield. The court granted the motion to withdraw filed by Stanfield's counsel, who asserted there were no arguable issues on appeal. The case involved allegations of drug use and endangerment of minor children.

Earnest Maxwell v. Lavski Management, LLC - Unlawful Detainer

The Arkansas Court of Appeals has issued an opinion in the case of Earnest Maxwell v. Lavski Management, LLC. The court remanded the case to settle and supplement the record, specifically concerning a transcript of a hearing that encompassed Maxwell's motion to dismiss and Lavski's request for damages.

Cheyanna Spann v. State of Arkansas - Probation Revocation

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed the revocation of Cheyanna Spann's probation for possession of methamphetamine, theft, and failure to pay court fees. Spann was originally placed on probation in May 2024 and subsequently violated its terms, leading to a four-year prison sentence.

Billy Bagwell v. State of Arkansas - Rape Conviction Appeal

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed the rape conviction of Billy Bagwell. Bagwell appealed his conviction, arguing insufficient evidence, but the court found the evidence sufficient to support the jury's verdict. The opinion was delivered on March 11, 2026.

John Lang v. State of Arkansas - Criminal Appeal

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of John Lang for rape and sexual assault. Lang was sentenced to seventy years imprisonment. The court found sufficient evidence to support the convictions based on the victim's testimony.

Supreme Court of New Jersey Opinion on Vicarious Liability for Teacher Sexual Abuse

The Supreme Court of New Jersey issued an opinion in Russell Forde Hornor v. Upper Freehold Regional Board of Education, addressing vicarious liability for school districts concerning teacher sexual abuse. The Court considered whether N.J.S.A. 59:2-1.3(a)(1) allows for imposing liability on a school district for a teacher's sexual abuse of a student outside the scope of employment.

State of Iowa v. Erik John Hanson - Criminal Appeal

The Iowa Court of Appeals dismissed Erik Hanson's appeal challenging his guilty plea for assault causing bodily injury. The court found it lacked jurisdiction because Hanson waived any conflict claim with his counsel.

Iowa Court of Appeals Opinion - L.S. v. A.A.

The Iowa Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision regarding a protective order and child custody. The court found no basis to grant the relief requested by the appellant, upholding the mediated agreement and subsequent decree.

State of Iowa v. Jerry Christopher Johnson - Sentence Affirmation

The Iowa Court of Appeals affirmed the sentence imposed on Jerry Christopher Johnson after the revocation of his deferred judgment. The court found no abuse of discretion in the sentencing decision.

Dakota Poland v. State of Iowa - Postconviction Relief Appeal

The Iowa Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of Dakota Poland's second postconviction relief application. The court found that Poland's application was time-barred by the statute of limitations, despite the lower court's ruling on other grounds.

Dakota Poland v. State of Iowa - Ineffective Counsel Claim

The Iowa Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision, dismissing Dakota Poland's second postconviction relief application. The court found the application time-barred by the three-year statute of limitations.

State of Iowa v. Scott Chase Barnum - Criminal Appeal

The Iowa Court of Appeals affirmed a criminal defendant's discretionary sentence following a guilty plea. The court found that the district court properly considered the defendant's statements regarding his knowledge of the victim's age and was not required to accept the defendant's expert testimony.

State of Iowa v. Ray Myron Rice Jr. - Criminal Conviction Appeal

The Iowa Court of Appeals affirmed Ray Myron Rice Jr.'s conviction for domestic-abuse assault but vacated part of his sentence related to a no-contact order. The court remanded the case for correction of the no-contact order, specifically regarding findings of 'intimate partner' status and a firearm prohibition based on that finding.

Iowa Court of Appeals Dismisses Erik John Hanson's Appeal

The Iowa Court of Appeals dismissed Erik John Hanson's appeal challenging his guilty plea to assault causing bodily injury. The court found that Hanson waived his claims regarding the right to counsel by entering a guilty plea, and therefore, the court lacked jurisdiction to hear the appeal.

L.S. v. A.A. - Custody and Protective Order Modification Appeal

The Iowa Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision regarding custody, physical care, and support, as well as a modification of a protective order. The appellate court found no basis to grant the appellant relief on her various claims, including issues related to mediation, recusal, and a motion for new trial.

State of Iowa v. Jerry Christopher Johnson - Criminal Sentencing Appeal

The Iowa Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision to revoke Jerry Johnson's deferred judgment and sentence him to prison. The court found no abuse of discretion in the sentencing, citing Johnson's repeated probation violations, including absconding for nearly four years.

State of Iowa v. Jereme Michael Owens - Stalking Conviction Appeal

The Iowa Court of Appeals affirmed a conviction for stalking in violation of a protective order. The defendant appealed, arguing insufficient evidence, but the court found the evidence supported the conviction for a course of conduct intended to cause fear or intimidation. The appellate court's decision upholds the lower court's ruling and sentence.

State v. Ray Rice Jr. - Conviction Affirmed, Sentence Vacated

The Iowa Court of Appeals affirmed Ray Rice Jr.'s conviction for domestic-abuse assault while displaying a dangerous weapon. The court vacated a portion of his sentence related to a no-contact order finding him and his mother to be "intimate partners" and a firearm prohibition based on that finding, remanding for correction.

Drew Matthew Moir v. State of Iowa - Postconviction Relief Appeal

The Iowa Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of postconviction relief for Drew Matthew Moir. The court's decision was based on the postconviction court's credibility findings and the applicant's failure to demonstrate he would have demanded a trial with different counsel.

State of Iowa v. John Robert West - Affirmation of Convictions

The Iowa Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions of John Robert West for sexual abuse and lascivious acts with a child. The court rejected West's claims regarding territorial jurisdiction, variance between charges and proof, insufficient evidence of age, and sentencing.

Court of Appeals Opinion on Postconviction Relief Denial

The Iowa Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of postconviction relief for Drew Matthew Moir. The court found that Moir failed to prove ineffective assistance of counsel regarding his waiver to adult court and that he would have demanded a trial, upholding the lower court's decision.

State of Iowa v. Scott Chase Barnum - Criminal Appeal

The Iowa Court of Appeals affirmed a discretionary sentence for Scott Chase Barnum, who appealed his conviction for performing sex acts on a minor. The court addressed Barnum's challenges regarding the consideration of his statements about the victim's age and the weight given to expert testimony.

Charles White v. State of Iowa - Postconviction Relief Denied

The Iowa Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of Charles White's application for postconviction relief. The court found that White's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel were not preserved and would also fail on the merits. This decision upholds the original convictions.

White v. State of Iowa - Post-Conviction Relief Appeal

The Iowa Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of Charles White's application for post-conviction relief. The court found that White's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel were not preserved and would have been rejected on the merits even if preserved.

State of Iowa v. John Robert West - Child Sex Abuse Case Opinion

The Iowa Court of Appeals filed an opinion affirming the conviction of John Robert West for seven counts of second-degree sexual abuse and four counts of lascivious acts with a child. The court addressed West's claims regarding insufficient evidence, territorial jurisdiction, and sentencing.

State v. Owens - Stalking Conviction Appeal

The Iowa Court of Appeals affirmed Jereme Owens' stalking conviction, finding sufficient evidence to support the jury's verdict. Owens had appealed his conviction, arguing insufficient evidence for key elements of the stalking charge.

State v. McKnight - Appeal Dismissed

The Iowa Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal of Jerell Theodore McKnight in State v. McKnight. The court found it lacked jurisdiction because McKnight failed to establish good cause to appeal following his guilty plea, specifically by not filing a motion in arrest of judgment. The dismissal upholds the original sentencing.

State of Iowa v. Jerell Theodore McKnight - Criminal Appeal Dismissal

The Iowa Court of Appeals dismissed Jerell McKnight's appeal regarding his guilty plea to willful injury. The dismissal was based on McKnight's failure to establish good cause to challenge his plea by not filing a motion in arrest of judgment, thus lacking jurisdiction.

State of Iowa v. Taurean Lee Murray Jr. - Criminal Appeal

The Iowa Court of Appeals affirmed a conviction for violating a statute prohibiting persons ineligible to carry dangerous weapons. The defendant challenged the statute's constitutionality, but the court found it compliant with state and federal law, referencing a prior supreme court ruling.

State of Iowa v. Taurean Lee Murray Jr. - Criminal Conviction Affirmation

The Iowa Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Taurean Lee Murray Jr. for carrying a dangerous weapon while ineligible. The court rejected his arguments that the statute was unconstitutional and that the district court erred in denying his motion to dismiss.

Massachusetts Awards $8.7M for Energy Efficiency Projects

The Massachusetts Healey-Driscoll Administration announced $8.7 million in grant funding for 34 energy efficiency and clean energy projects. The funding, administered by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, will support municipal water facilities, agricultural and food-producing non-profits, and small businesses.

State AGs Sue Education Dept. Over Data Demand

A coalition of 10 state Attorneys General, led by Colorado AG Phil Weiser, has sued the U.S. Department of Education to halt new data collection requirements for higher education institutions. The lawsuit challenges the department's demand for race and sex-based data, arguing it is an unlawful expansion of the IPEDS system and jeopardizes student privacy.

Dexter Lee Williams v. State - Case Dismissed

The Georgia Court of Appeals dismissed Dexter Lee Williams's appeal in a criminal case. The court found that the appeal was an impermissible second attempt to challenge his conviction, affirming the trial court's denial of his motions.

McCloskey International Limited v. GJ&L, Inc. - Contempt Order Reversed

The Court of Appeals of Georgia reversed in part and vacated in part a lower court's order holding McCloskey International Limited and James Teague in contempt. The court found no wilful contempt and vacated the award of attorney fees due to a lack of legal authority cited.

Leshon Nelson v. Evi Cws Quill, LLC - Dismissed

The Court of Appeals of Georgia dismissed the direct appeal filed by Leshon Nelson in the case Leshon Nelson v. Evi Cws Quill, LLC. The dismissal was based on two grounds: the appellant was required to follow discretionary appeal procedures, and the notice of appeal was untimely filed.

La'conte Akins v. State - Case Dismissed

The Court of Appeals of Georgia dismissed the case of La'conte Akins v. State. The dismissal was based on two grounds: the appellant's failure to meet the statutory requirements for an out-of-time appeal and the untimely filing of the notice of appeal.

People v. Valencia - Criminal Appeal

The California Court of Appeal affirmed and remanded a criminal conviction for Isaias Valencia. The court held that exigent circumstances justified the warrantless entry into the defendant's apartment and rejected claims regarding the number of crimes. Sentencing errors were ordered corrected.

P. v. Valencia - Published Court Opinion

The California Court of Appeal, Second District, has published an opinion in the case of P. v. Valencia. This document provides the court's final decision and reasoning on the matters presented.

United States v. Derrick Davis - Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Opinion

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the sentence of Derrick Davis, who was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm. The court found an irreconcilable conflict in the district court's sentencing, where it adopted factual findings against enhancement for possession in connection with another felony, but then credited government arguments for enhancement based on a jail call. The case is remanded for resentencing.

Dawydiak v. FEMASYS INC. et al - Civil Case

A new civil case, Dawydiak v. FEMASYS INC. et al, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on February 25, 2026. The case involves a labor dispute. A recent filing on March 11, 2026, was a consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge.

Buyers Holdings LLC - Cease and Desist Order for Unlicensed Collection Activity

The Connecticut Department of Banking has issued a temporary order to cease and desist against Buyers Holdings, LLC for engaging in unlicensed consumer collection activity. The company is also ordered to make restitution and faces potential civil penalties for violations of state statutes.

Order against Milner Legal Services - Consumer Collection Violations

The Connecticut Department of Banking has issued an order against Milner Legal Services for violations of consumer collection laws, including operating without a license and making false representations. A civil penalty of $100,000 has been imposed.

DOJ releases first corporate enforcement policy for criminal cases

DOJ releases first corporate enforcement policy for criminal cases

Swiss executive Martin Schlaepfer pleads guilty to securities fraud

Swiss executive Martin Schlaepfer pleads guilty to securities fraud

Second man charged in meth trafficking murder case

Second man charged in meth trafficking murder case

Justice approves 649 Camp Lejeune settlements totaling $175 million

Justice approves 649 Camp Lejeune settlements totaling $175 million

Tennessee tax preparer pleads guilty to $80M pandemic relief fraud

Tennessee tax preparer pleads guilty to $80M pandemic relief fraud

Mexican national pleads guilty to forced labor racketeering conspiracy

Mexican national pleads guilty to forced labor racketeering conspiracy

Lynn v. Ellis - Property Dispute

The Oregon Court of Appeals vacated and remanded the case of Lynn v. Ellis for entry of a judgment declaring the parties' rights. The court affirmed the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant, finding no genuine issue of material fact.

State v. M. W. - Oregon Court of Appeals Affirmation

The Oregon Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision committing an individual to the Oregon Health Authority for 180 days and prohibiting firearm possession. The court found no arguably meritorious issues on appeal.

State v. K. W. - Case Reversed

The Oregon Court of Appeals reversed a judgment committing K. W. to the Oregon Health Authority for mental health treatment and an order prohibiting firearm possession. The court found plain error in the trial court's failure to advise the appellant of all possible hearing results and in not dismissing the case after a delay in proceedings.

State v. Malouf - Criminal Appeal

The Oregon Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's decision to revoke John Phillip Malouf's probation. The court found that the defendant had sufficient notice of the probation condition requiring permission before leaving the state, as referenced in the judgment and ORS 137.540(1)(d).

Warren v. State of Oregon - Post-Conviction Relief Appeal

The Oregon Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's denial of post-conviction relief for Keoni Henry Warren. The appeal concerned allegations of non-unanimous guilty verdicts, which the appellate court found to be without merit after reviewing the record and relevant case law.

State v. K. D. B. - Juvenile Delinquency Jurisdiction

The Oregon Court of Appeals reversed a jurisdictional judgment against youth K. D. B. concerning a second-degree sexual abuse charge. The court found the evidence legally insufficient to prove the mental state element for Count 3, leading to the reversal of that specific jurisdictional judgment.

Khosroabadi v. North Clackamas Parks and Rec. Dist. - Reversed and Remanded

The Oregon Court of Appeals reversed and remanded a lower court's decision in Khosroabadi v. North Clackamas Parks and Rec. Dist. The appellate court found that the city council's petition for judicial validation of its withdrawal from a service district should have been granted, overturning the trial court's ruling that required a county board vote.

FDA Early Alert: Erbe USA Cryoprobes Rupture Risk

The FDA issued an Early Alert regarding Erbe USA Flexible Cryoprobes due to a risk of rupture during activation, potentially causing injuries and hearing loss. Erbe USA has recalled affected lots and recommended discontinuing use.

GAO Report: Student Loan Servicers Failed Standards, Resulting in Penalties

A GAO report found that 4 out of 5 federal student loan servicers failed to meet performance standards for record accuracy and call quality, leading to approximately $850,000 in penalties. The Department of Education's Office of Federal Student Aid (FSA) stopped assessing these metrics in February 2025 due to staff reductions.

GAO Report: Museum Maintenance Backlog and Risks

A GAO report highlights that approximately 85% of US museums have a maintenance backlog, with many facing risks to collections and visitor safety due to aging infrastructure. The report notes that federal funding is not available for construction-related expenses, and the total cost of repairs remains unknown.

NHTSA Notice: Zoox Application for Exemption from FMVSS

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has received an application from Zoox for a temporary exemption from certain Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) for its automated driving system-equipped vehicle. The agency is seeking public comment on this application.

EPC VA 24 LLC Enforcement Action and Comment Period

The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality has proposed an enforcement action against EPC VA 24 LLC for violations of water control laws and permit conditions. A public comment period is open from March 11, 2026, to April 10, 2026, for a proposed Consent Order.

Presidential Message Honoring Harriet Tubman

The White House issued a presidential message on March 10, 2026, celebrating the life and legacy of Harriet Tubman as part of the America 250 celebrations. The message highlights Tubman's contributions to freedom and liberty in the United States.

Illinois Issues Cease and Desist Order to Kirk J. Reeves

The Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation has issued a cease and desist order against Kirk J. Reeves for operating businesses using the terms "bank" and "trust" without proper authorization. The order cites violations of the Illinois Banking Act and the Corporate Fiduciary Act.

People v. Valencia - Criminal Appeal

The 2nd District Court of Appeal in California has docketed a new criminal appeal case, People v. Valencia (Case No. B338672). The filing date was June 10, 2024. Oral arguments are scheduled for January 28, 2026.

CPSC Toddler Bed Safety Standard Revision Consultation

The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) has issued a notice of availability and is requesting comments on a proposed revision to the voluntary standard for toddler beds. The comment period for this proposed rule closes on March 25, 2026.

Stanley L. Demps v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal

This document is an opinion from the Florida court system regarding the case of Stanley L. Demps v. State of Florida. The opinion addresses legal arguments and decisions made within the context of a criminal appeal.

Haya v. Hall - Appellate Court Opinion

The Fifth District Court of Appeal of Florida issued an opinion in the case of Lisa M. Haya f/k/a Lisa M. Hall v. Lennie P. Hall. The court affirmed the lower court's decision, as indicated by the disposition.

Arthur Debose v. State of Florida - Appellate Case

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision in Arthur Debose v. State of Florida. The case, with docket number 6D2025-2127, was affirmed by the court on March 10, 2026.

Banner v. State of Florida - Appellate Case Affirmation

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision in Banner v. State of Florida. The appellate court's disposition was 'Affirmed', indicating no change to the original ruling. The case involved an appeal from a lower tribunal decision.

Carr v. State of Florida - Affirmation of Lower Court Ruling

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's ruling in Carr v. State of Florida. The case, with docket number 6D2024-1131, involved an appeal by Jacob Nathaniel Randy Carr against the State of Florida.

M. O. v. State of Florida - Involuntary Placement Appeal

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court's decision regarding the involuntary placement of M. O. The case, identified by docket number 6D2025-2027, involved an appeal of a lower tribunal's order. The appellate court issued a per curiam opinion affirming the disposition.

Joseph v. Sunbelt Investors Asset Company, LLC - Appellate Opinion

The Florida District Court of Appeal issued an opinion in the case of Ronald Joseph and Christina Thomas v. Sunbelt Investors Asset Company, LLC. The court affirmed the lower tribunal's decision, with the opinion dated March 10, 2026.

Tyquez Cobb v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal

The District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the lower court's decision in the case of Tyquez Cobb v. State of Florida. The appellate court issued its disposition on March 10, 2026, with docket number 5D2025-1265.

Alonza Henry v. State of Florida - Court Opinion

This document is a court opinion regarding the case of Alonza Henry v. State of Florida. The opinion details the court's decision and reasoning on the legal matters presented in the case. It serves as a record of the judicial proceedings and outcome.

Robert A. Davis v. 10091 Tl Manager, LLC - Case Affirmation

The District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the decision in Robert A. Davis v. 10091 Tl Manager, LLC. The case, with docket number 6D2024-2041, involved an appeal from the County Court for Orange County. The disposition was officially affirmed on March 10, 2026.

McClung v. McClung - Florida District Court of Appeal Opinion

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision in the case of John Michael McClung v. Brennan Coleen McClung. The appellate court issued its opinion on March 10, 2026, with no known citations or subsequent citations.

Hall v. Brandon Chase Homeowners Association, Inc. - Appellate Decision

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court's decision in the case of Eddie C. Hall and Jacqueline C. Hall v. Brandon Chase Homeowners Association, Inc. The appellate court issued its opinion on March 10, 2026, with no further details on the specific nature of the case provided in the summary.

Michael Panarello v. Christina Panarello - Florida DCA Opinion

The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal issued an opinion in Michael Panarello v. Christina Panarello, affirming the lower tribunal's decision. The case bears docket number 6D2025-1804. The court's disposition was 'Affirmed'.

Crouch v. State of Florida - Affirmation of Lower Court Ruling

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's ruling in Crouch v. State of Florida. The appellate court's decision, issued on March 10, 2026, upholds the previous judgment without introducing new legal precedent or significant changes.

Valera-Rodriguez v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal

The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision in the case of Juan Benjamin Valera-Rodriguez v. State of Florida. The appeal, docketed as 6D2024-1087, concerned a criminal matter with a lower tribunal number of 2016-CF-000433.

McCoy v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal

The District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the lower court's decision in McCoy v. State of Florida. The case, with docket number 5D2025-2450, involved a criminal appeal. The disposition was affirmed on March 10, 2026.

Butler v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal

The Florida Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision in the case of Jeremiah Butler v. State of Florida. The appellate court issued its disposition on March 10, 2026, with no further motions pending. This ruling pertains to a criminal case originating from Duval County.

Antonio Lyons v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision in the case of Antonio Lyons v. State of Florida. The appellate court issued its disposition on March 10, 2026, with no further actions or penalties specified.

Scott A. Roberts v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal

The District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the lower court's decision in Scott A. Roberts v. State of Florida. The appellate court issued its ruling on March 10, 2026, with docket number 6D2024-0826. This decision pertains to a criminal appeal.

J.M.G. v. Uber Technologies Inc. et al - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, J.M.G. v. Uber Technologies Inc. et al, was filed on March 11, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves personal injury and product liability claims against Uber Technologies Inc. and its subsidiaries.

Ca.L. v. Uber Technologies Inc. et al - Personal Injury Product Liability

A civil case, Ca.L. v. Uber Technologies Inc. et al, was filed on March 11, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves claims of personal injury and product liability. The filing includes a complaint, civil cover sheet, proposed summons, and a certificate of interested entities.

State v. Stolaroff - Criminal Appeal

The Washington Court of Appeals has issued an opinion in the case of State v. Stolaroff. The opinion, filed on March 10, 2026, addresses a criminal appeal originating from Pacific County Superior Court. This is an unpublished opinion and should not be cited.

Kevin Dolan v. State of Washington - Court of Appeals Opinion

The Washington State Court of Appeals has issued an opinion in the case of Kevin Dolan v. State of Washington Dept of Retirement Systems. The opinion was filed on March 10, 2026, with docket number 60045-5. This document provides the official record of the appellate court's decision.

In Re B.R. - Washington Court of Appeals Opinion

The Washington Court of Appeals Division II has issued an opinion in the case In Re the Interest of B.R., with docket number 61638-6. The opinion was filed on March 10, 2026, and reviews a judgment from the Clark Superior Court.

State v. Barnes - Court of Appeals Opinion

The Washington Court of Appeals has issued an opinion in the case of State of Washington v. Anthony Eugene Barnes. The opinion was filed on March 10, 2026, and pertains to an appeal from the Mason County Superior Court. This document provides the case title, docket number, and information about the judges and counsel involved.

State v. Chelsie McDaniel - Washington Court of Appeals Opinion

The Washington Court of Appeals has issued an unpublished opinion in the case of State v. Chelsie McDaniel. The opinion was filed on March 10, 2026, and pertains to an appeal from Pierce County Superior Court.

Nixon v. State of Washington - Court of Appeals Opinion

The Washington Court of Appeals Division II has issued an opinion in the case of Jamie Nixon, et al., Appellants v. State of Washington, et. al., Respondents. The opinion was filed on March 10, 2026, under docket number 60181-8.

In re William P. McBride - Personal Restraint Petition

The Washington Court of Appeals, Division III, filed an opinion in the case of In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of William P. McBride. The case originated from the Whitman Superior Court, with a file date of March 10, 2026.

Marvin Leo Personal Restraint Petition - Court of Appeals

The Washington Court of Appeals Division II has issued an unpublished opinion regarding a Personal Restraint Petition filed by Marvin Leo. The case, with docket number 61187-2, originated from a Pierce County Superior Court judgment filed on February 11, 2000. The opinion was authored by Judge Anne Cruser.

Alesia Eaton v. American Medical Response - Opinion

The Washington Court of Appeals Division II has issued an opinion in the case of Alesia Eaton v. American Medical Response. The opinion was filed on March 10, 2026, and pertains to an appeal from Thurston Superior Court.

Grandison v. Inland Neurosurgery & Spine Associates - Court Opinion

The Washington Court of Appeals Division III has issued an opinion in the case of Grandison v. Inland Neurosurgery & Spine Associates, et al. The opinion was filed on March 10, 2026, and pertains to an appeal from the Spokane Superior Court.

Richland Sky Apartments v Monique Pearson - Court of Appeals Opinion

The Washington Court of Appeals has issued an opinion in the case of Richland Sky Apartments, LLC v. Monique Pearson. The case was filed on March 10, 2026, and originated from the Benton Superior Court. This document represents the court's final decision on the appeal.

State v. Vassallo Jr - Court of Appeals Opinion

The Washington Court of Appeals Division II has issued an unpublished opinion in the case of State of Washington v. John Louis Vassallo Jr. The opinion was filed on March 10, 2026, and pertains to an appeal from the Skamania Superior Court.

Miller v. Lamanna - Appeal of Dismissal for Failure to State a Claim

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a district court's dismissal of a former corrections officer's discrimination and retaliation claims. The appellate court found the district court erred by converting a summary judgment motion into a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss, considering only the complaint's allegations.

Broadcast Music, Inc. v. North American Concert Promoters Association - Antitrust

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a district court's decision regarding music licensing fees set by Broadcast Music, Inc. (BMI) for the North American Concert Promoters Association (NACPA). The court found the imposed rates and expanded definition of gross revenues to be unreasonable and remanded the case for further proceedings.

GEICO v. Mayzenberg - Insurance No-Fault Benefits Dispute

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a district court judgment in favor of GEICO in GEICO v. Mayzenberg. The court found that GEICO could not deny no-fault benefits based on alleged professional misconduct, following a ruling from the New York Court of Appeals. The case is remanded for further proceedings.

Bugliotti v. Republic of Argentina - Sovereign Bond Payment Dispute

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals partially affirmed and partially vacated a district court's dismissal of a bondholder lawsuit against the Republic of Argentina. The court found that some of the bondholders' claims for over $35 million in defaulted principal payments are timely and that they now have the authority under Argentine law to sue.

Peña Garcia v. Department of Labor - Workers' Compensation

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals denied a petition for review in Peña Garcia v. Department of Labor. The court affirmed the Department of Labor's decision that reimbursement for medicinal cannabis-infused edibles is not covered under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act due to marijuana's Schedule I classification under federal law.

Kellogg v. Nichols - Amended Opinion on Judicial Immunity and Firearms Licensing

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals filed an amended opinion in Kellogg v. Nichols, reaffirming that state judges have absolute judicial immunity when ruling on firearms license applications. The court also held that federal jurisdiction under Article III bars official-capacity claims for injunctive and declaratory relief against such judges.

Connecticut Fair Housing Center v. CoreLogic Rental Property Solutions - Fair Housing Act

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated in part, affirmed in part, and reversed in part a lower court decision concerning claims against CoreLogic Rental Property Solutions. The court found the Connecticut Fair Housing Center lacked standing and that while CoreLogic did not violate the Fair Housing Act, Arroyo failed to establish a prima facie case of disparate-impact discrimination.

US v. Jimenez - Sentencing Appeal

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed a district court's judgment in the case of US v. William Jimenez. The court upheld the sentence of 105 months imprisonment and three years of supervised release, including specific conditions related to electronic device searches, community service, and mental health counseling.

Safdieh v. Commissioner - Tax Court Summary Judgment Ruling

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a Tax Court decision, ruling that the Commissioner of Internal Revenue can assess penalties for failing to report control of a foreign business. The court vacated the summary judgment granted to the taxpayer and remanded the case for further proceedings.

Mar-Can Transport vs. Local 854 Pension Fund - ERISA Withdrawal Liability

The Second Circuit affirmed a lower court ruling, directing the Local 854 Pension Fund to reduce Mar-Can Transportation Company's ERISA withdrawal liability by $1.8 million. The decision clarifies the interpretation of ERISA Section 1415(c) regarding the calculation of withdrawal liability when employees switch unions.

Reidy Contracting Group v. Mt. Hawley Insurance - Insurance Coverage Dispute

The Second Circuit affirmed a district court's decision, holding that Mt. Hawley Insurance Company must provide additional insured coverage to Reidy Contracting Group. The court found Reidy to be an additional insured and that the Employers Liability Exclusion was ambiguous and thus construed against Mt. Hawley.

SBK ART LLC v. Akin Gump - Discovery for Foreign Litigation

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's order granting SBK ART LLC's petition for discovery under 28 U.S.C. §1782 to aid foreign litigation. The court held that the law firm Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP must produce documents and testimony for use in European proceedings, disagreeing with Akin's argument that the discovery was not permissible if not directly discoverable from their foreign client.

Care One LLC v NLRB - Unfair Labor Practice Proceedings

The Second Circuit affirmed a district court's denial of a preliminary injunction sought by Care One LLC and affiliated health care facilities. The facilities challenged NLRB proceedings for alleged unfair labor practices, arguing the ALJ was improperly appointed due to a lack of NLRB quorum. The appellate court found the plaintiffs could not demonstrate irreparable harm, thus affirming the lower court's decision.

US v. Cardenas - Cocaine Import Conspiracy Appeal

The Second Circuit vacated the conviction of Jey James Roldan Cardenas for conspiracy to import cocaine. The court found that the district court erred in excluding evidence relevant to Cardenas's defense of lacking criminal intent, remanding the case for further proceedings.

United States v. Aryeetey - Affirmation of Conviction and Sentence

The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the conviction and sentence of Ivanjoel Aryeetey for being a felon in possession of a firearm. The court found no abuse of discretion in admitting DNA evidence and deemed the sentence substantively reasonable.

B.B. v. Hochul - Minors' Rights to Family Integrity

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed in part and affirmed in part a district court's decision in B.B. v. Hochul, finding that minors have standing to sue over New York's child certification scheme that allegedly violates their due process rights. The court remanded the case for further proceedings.

Peter Adams v. Entergy - Reversed and Rendered Opinion

The Louisiana Court of Appeal reversed and rendered a trial court judgment against Entergy New Orleans, Inc. The appellate court found Entergy not liable for negligence related to a natural gas leak and personal injuries claimed by plaintiffs. This decision dismisses the plaintiffs' claims with prejudice.

Sadra Hamilton v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans - Employment Appeal

The Louisiana Court of Appeal affirmed a Civil Service Commission decision reinstating Sadra Hamilton after her termination for violating the workplace violence policy. The Board failed to meet its burden of proof for the termination.

Cold Case Task Force Continuation Bill

Colorado Bill HB26-1185 proposes to continue the Cold Case Task Force for thirteen years, implementing recommendations from a 2025 sunset report. The bill would authorize additional task force members and alter the type of sunset review conducted by the Department of Regulatory Agencies.

Colorado Bill Modifies County Elected Officer Salary Categories

Colorado Bill SB26-092 proposes to modify the salary categorization for elected county officers in Dolores and Pitkin Counties. The bill, introduced for the 2026 Regular Session, would reclassify Dolores County from category V-C to V-D, potentially decreasing salaries, and Pitkin County from II-B to I-A, potentially increasing salaries.

Colorado Bill Proposes Repeal of Retail Delivery Fees

Colorado Bill HB26-1266 proposes the repeal of retail delivery fees. The bill, introduced in the 2026 regular session, would eliminate these fees effective 90 days after the final adjournment of the general assembly in 2026. The fees are currently imposed on retail deliveries made by various state enterprises.

Colorado Bill Regulates Compounded Weight-Loss Medications

Colorado's SB26-066 establishes regulations for compounded weight-loss medications not approved by the FDA. The bill requires specific manufacturing standards, ingredient disclosures, and patient warnings, and prohibits misleading advertising. The State Board of Pharmacy can issue fines and revoke licenses for violations.

Colorado Resolution on National Public Lands Protection

Colorado's legislature has passed SJR26-015, a resolution concerning the protection of the public's interest in the management of the state's national public lands. The resolution was introduced and passed in the 2026 regular session.

Colorado Bill Updates Accessible Housing Building Code Standards

Colorado's SB26-109 proposes updates to building code standards for accessible housing supported by public funds. The bill aims to clarify definitions, permit alternative appeal processes, and require developers to create implementation plans for accessible units.

Colorado Bill Continues Cash-Bonding Agent Regulation Until 2039

Colorado Bill HB26-1186 proposes to extend the regulation of cash-bonding and professional cash-bail agents by the division of insurance until 2039. This action implements a recommendation from the department of regulatory agencies' sunset review.

Colorado Joint Memorializing Former Senator Lewis H. Entz

The Colorado Legislature has introduced and passed Joint Memorial No. 26, which memorializes the life and service of former Senator Lewis H. Entz. This action is a formal recognition and does not impose any new regulatory requirements.

Epilepsy-Related Mortality Awareness and Prevention Bill

Colorado Bill SB26-077 proposes new requirements for the department of public health and environment to increase awareness and prevention of epilepsy-related mortality. The bill mandates information dissemination, training for death investigation professionals, public health campaigns, and reporting to a registry.

Commerce Preliminary Antidumping Duty Findings on Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar

The U.S. Department of Commerce announced preliminary affirmative antidumping duty findings on steel concrete reinforcing bar from Bulgaria, Egypt, and Vietnam. The preliminary dumping margins range from 34.20% to 121.97% for specific companies and entities. The final determination is expected around July 28, 2026.

United States v. Maldonado-Vargas - Court Opinion Errata

The US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit issued an errata sheet to amend a prior opinion in the case of United States v. Carlos Maldonado-Vargas. The amendments clarify language regarding the restitution order as a condition of supervised release and the vacating of bank fraud convictions.

Maldonado-Ruiz v. Bondi - Petition for Review of Immigration Order

The First Circuit Court of Appeals denied a petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals decision. The petitioner sought asylum and withholding of removal based on her testimony of being bisexual, but the court found she failed to establish past persecution or a nexus to her claimed particular social groups.

Travelers Casualty Insurance Company of America v. ACE American Insurance Company

Travelers Casualty Insurance Company of America has filed a new civil case, Case Number 3:26-cv-02066, against ACE American Insurance Company in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case was filed on March 10, 2026, with a filing fee of $405.

R.L. v. United States, Federal Bureau of Prisons - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, R.L. v. United States (Federal Bureau of Prisons) et al., was filed on March 10, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case number is 3:26-cv-02085. The initial filings include a complaint, proposed summons, and a motion to maintain plaintiff anonymity.

A.B. v. United States of America - Civil Case Filing

A civil case, A.B. v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons) et al, was filed on March 10, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case number is 3:26-cv-02077. The initial filings include a complaint, proposed summons, a motion to maintain plaintiff anonymity, and a consent to proceed before a US Magistrate Judge.

V.V. v. United States - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, V.V. v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons) et al, was filed on March 10, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case number is 3:26-cv-02088. Initial filings include a complaint, proposed summons, a motion to maintain plaintiff anonymity, and a consent to proceed before a US Magistrate Judge.

AM.M. v. Uber Technologies Inc. - Personal Injury Product Liability

A new civil case, AM.M. v. Uber Technologies Inc. et al., was filed on March 11, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves personal injury and product liability claims.

Roe v. United States of America et al - Civil Rights Case

A new civil rights case, Roe v. United States of America et al, was filed on March 10, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves the U.S. government as a defendant and is categorized under Civil Rights: Other. The filing fee was $405.

Roe v. United States of America - Civil Rights Case

A new civil rights case, Roe v. United States of America et al., has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, bearing number 4:26-cv-02080, was filed on March 10, 2026, with the nature of suit identified as Civil Rights: Other.

Roe v. United States of America - Civil Rights Case

A new civil rights case, Roe v. United States of America, has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case was filed on March 10, 2026, with case number 4:26-cv-02078. The nature of the suit is listed as Civil Rights: Other.

E.S. v. United States - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, E.S. v. United States (Federal Bureau of Prisons) et al, was filed on March 10, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, bearing docket number 3:26-cv-02081, involves a complaint against U.S. Government defendants and includes a filing fee of $405.

Roe v. United States of America - Civil Rights Case

Jane HS Roe filed a civil rights case against the United States of America in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, docketed as 4:26-cv-02075, was filed on March 10, 2026, with a filing fee of $405.

District Council 16 v. Advanced Industrial Services, Inc. - Labor ERISA

The District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund filed a new civil complaint against Advanced Industrial Services, Inc. on March 10, 2026. The case, bearing number 3:26-cv-02070, is based on a Federal Question and falls under the Nature of Suit category for Labor: E.R.I.S.A.

Endurance American Specialty Insurance Company et al v. JMA Ventures LLC - Insurance Dispute

A new civil case, Endurance American Specialty Insurance Company et al v. JMA Ventures LLC, was filed on March 10, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves an insurance dispute and includes a complaint for declaratory judgment.

System Insights US Limited v. Vimana LLC et al - Contract Dispute

A new civil case, System Insights US Limited v. Vimana LLC et al, was filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of California on March 10, 2026. The case is based on diversity jurisdiction and involves a contract dispute. No further details or summaries are currently available.

Steele v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A - Civil Fraud Case

A civil class action complaint alleging fraud has been filed against JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. The case, Steele v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., was filed on March 10, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The basis for the suit is diversity jurisdiction and the nature of the suit is listed as 'Other Fraud'.

SHC v. Uber Technologies - Personal Injury Product Liability

A new civil case, SHC (M.G.) v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al, was filed on March 10, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves personal injury and product liability claims. The filing includes a complaint, proposed summons, and a certificate of interested entities.

Boothe v. SSA Commissioner - Social Security Case

A new civil case, Boothe v. SSA Commissioner, was filed on March 10, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a dispute regarding Social Security benefits under Title XIV.

R.S. v. Uber Technologies Inc. et al - Personal Injury Product Liability

A new civil case, R.S. v. Uber Technologies Inc. et al, has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, bearing number 3:26-cv-02062, is based on diversity jurisdiction and concerns personal injury product liability.

S.N. v. United States of America - Civil Case

A new civil case, S.N. v. United States of America, was filed on March 10, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves the Federal Bureau of Prisons as a defendant. The filing includes a complaint, proposed summons, a motion to maintain plaintiff anonymity, and a consent to proceed before a US Magistrate Judge.

C.O. v. US Federal Bureau of Prisons - Civil Case

A new civil case, C.O. v. US Federal Bureau of Prisons, was filed on March 10, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a complaint against the Federal Bureau of Prisons and includes filings for a proposed summons and a motion to maintain plaintiff anonymity.

Peniche v. Plutus Financial Holdings Inc. et al - Contract Dispute

A new civil case, Peniche v. Plutus Financial Holdings Inc. et al, was filed on March 10, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a contract dispute and includes a complaint and proposed summons.

B.V. v. United States - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, B.V. v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons) et al, was filed on March 10, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case number is 3:26-cv-02086. Initial filings include a complaint, proposed summons, and motions regarding anonymity and proceeding before a magistrate judge.

Shelp et al v. Abbott Laboratories et al - Personal Injury Product Liability

A new civil case, Shelp et al v. Abbott Laboratories et al, was filed on March 10, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves personal injury and product liability claims.

Com. v. Smith, R. - Non-Precedential Opinion

The Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a non-precedential opinion in the case of Commonwealth v. Smith, R. The court affirmed the dismissal of the appellant's Post-Conviction Relief Act (PCRA) petition as untimely. The appeal concerns allegations of a conflict of interest in prior PCRA proceedings.

Com. v. Williams, G. - Criminal Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court issued an opinion in the criminal appeal of Com. v. Williams, G. The court denied the appellant's counsel's application to withdraw due to missing transcripts and remanded the case for further proceedings. The appeal concerns convictions for firearms offenses and other charges.

Com. v. Snead, C. O'Dale - Court Opinion

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania reversed a conviction for disorderly conduct against Cheyenne O'Dale Snead. The court found insufficient evidence to support the conviction, vacating the judgment of sentence. This decision stems from an appeal of a sentence entered in January 2025.

Parke Bank v. Spaeder, G. - Court Opinion

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued an opinion in Parke Bank v. Spaeder, G., concerning a construction loan and guaranty agreement. The court affirmed the lower court's grant of summary judgment for Parke Bank but reversed and remanded for a trial on damages, awarding Parke Bank $10,430,209.25.

DOJ Audit of Victim Assistance Funds

The DOJ Office of the Inspector General has released an audit report on victim assistance funds subawarded by the Vermont Center for Crime Victim Services to Disability Rights Vermont, Inc. The audit identified $42,612 in questioned costs and made 6 recommendations.

Anderson v. Crouch - Reversed and Remanded

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the case of Shauntae Anderson v. William Crouch. The court's published opinion addressed issues related to the West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources and the Bureau for Medical Services. The specific details of the reversal and remand are outlined in the opinion.

System Insights US Limited v. Vimana Inc. et al - Contract Dispute

A new civil case, System Insights US Limited v. Vimana Inc. et al, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on March 10, 2026. The case involves a contract dispute and was assigned case number 3:26-cv-02054. The initial filing includes a complaint and civil cover sheet.

GSA Completes Sale of Former Madawaska Land Port of Entry

The U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) announced the $173,000 sale of a former Land Port of Entry in Madawaska, Maine. This action disposes of underutilized federal property, with the new owner planning to redevelop the site.

Theodore Gamble-Williams v. City of Boston, et al. - Order on Service and Counsel

The US District Court for Massachusetts ordered the plaintiff in Theodore Gamble-Williams v. City of Boston, et al. to complete service of an amended complaint by April 12, 2026. The court also directed the plaintiff to file a motion for appointment of counsel by March 31, 2026, if he wishes to seek pro bono representation.

Calderon Jimenez v. Noem - Settlement Enforcement Lawsuit

The District Court of Massachusetts issued an order enforcing a class action settlement agreement in Calderon Jimenez v. Noem. The court ruled that ICE must notify Class Counsel of enforcement actions against noncitizen class members and decisions to remove them within five business days.

State AGs Continue Live Nation Antitrust Case

Multiple state Attorneys General, led by Connecticut AG William Tong, announced they will continue litigation against Live Nation and Ticketmaster for alleged monopolization of the live entertainment industry. The states are proceeding independently of the federal government, seeking stronger remedies than a recently announced settlement.

State v. J. Stinger - Direct Appeal

The Montana Supreme Court affirmed the conviction of Justin Casey Stinger in State v. J. Stinger. The court reviewed Stinger's claims of denied due process and cumulative error, finding no grounds for a new trial.

Montana Supreme Court Affirms Marriage of Murphy Case

The Montana Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's decision in the Marriage of Murphy case. The court upheld the denial of a petition to modify a parenting plan, finding insufficient evidence to demonstrate a threat to the child's safety.

State v. C. Roope - Criminal Appeal

The Montana Supreme Court affirmed the conviction of Christopher Paul Roope for multiple felony offenses, including Partner or Family Member Assault and Tampering with Witnesses. The court's decision was issued as a non-precedential memorandum opinion.

K. Briggs v. State - Direct Appeal

The Montana Supreme Court affirmed the Gallatin County District Court's denial of postconviction relief for Kevin Anthony Briggs. The appeal concerned allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel regarding trial and appellate representation.

State v. J. Standifur - Criminal Possession Appeal

The Montana Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's decision in State v. J. Standifur, ruling that double jeopardy protections did not bar the continued prosecution of a drug possession charge after the defendant pleaded guilty to other related offenses. The court addressed whether statutory double-jeopardy protections apply when a defendant pleads guilty to some counts in a single proceeding.

State v. K. Sandberg - Criminal Appeal

The Montana Supreme Court reversed and remanded the convictions of Kevin Wesley Sandberg for sexual intercourse without consent, aggravated kidnapping, and robbery. The court found that the pervasive use of the term 'victim' and the admission of certain character evidence may have deprived Sandberg of a fair trial. The case is remanded for further proceedings.

State v. A. Walton - Direct Appeal

The Montana Supreme Court affirmed the conviction of Amanda Sharyce Walton on charges including sexual abuse of children and incest. The court found no error in the admission of prior bad acts evidence or expert testimony. The opinion is designated as non-precedential.

State v. Smith - Texting While Driving Conviction

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Justin Smith for prohibited use of an electronic device while driving. The court found sufficient evidence that Smith was manipulating his cell phone while operating his vehicle, upholding the lower court's decision.

State ex rel. Holloman v. Schuck - Writ of Prohibition

The Ohio Court of Appeals dismissed a writ of prohibition filed by Martin L. Holloman against Judge James P. Schuck. The court found that Holloman failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, and the underlying case involved the withdrawal of guilty pleas and subsequent retrial.

In re J.L. - Termination of Parental Rights

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision terminating parental rights and granting permanent custody of a child to Stark County Job and Family Services. The father appealed the decision, citing concerns about his criminal history and failure to meet case plan requirements.

State v. Oliver - Trial Court Lacked Jury Jurisdiction

The Ohio Court of Appeals reversed a trial court's judgment, finding it lacked jurisdiction to conduct a bench trial without a written jury waiver. The appellant had properly demanded a jury trial for a petty offense, and the record did not show a valid waiver.

State v. Semenchuk - Ohio Court of Appeals Opinion

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions and sentences of Orest Semenchuk. The court addressed Semenchuk's challenge to the imposition of consecutive sentences for multiple counts of pandering sexually oriented matter involving a minor or impaired person.

State v. Rayner - Ohio Court of Appeals Opinion

The Ohio Court of Appeals is reviewing a trial court's decision to suppress evidence against Melissa Rayner, arrested for OVI. The State argues the trial court erred in granting the motion to suppress, contending the officer had reasonable suspicion for field sobriety tests.

Superior Court Grants/Denies Motion to Suppress

The Delaware Superior Court granted in part and denied in part a motion to suppress evidence obtained from a smartphone search. The court addressed whether the independent source doctrine could validate evidence initially obtained via a general warrant, ultimately holding it could.

SJC Rules Armed Robbery Not Predicate Offense Under Force Clause

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled that armed robbery is not a predicate offense under the 'force clause' of G. L. c. 276, § 58A, as it can be committed with minimal force and without a weapon. This decision clarifies the scope of offenses eligible for pretrial detention under this statute.

Cooke v. Jean-Baptiste - Appellate Division Opinion

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York reversed a lower court's decision, granting defendants' motion for summary judgment. The court found that the plaintiff did not demonstrate a serious injury as required by Insurance Law § 5102(d) following a 2018 motor vehicle accident.

People v. Lezama - Sex Offender Classification Appeal

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York reversed an order adjudicating a defendant a level three sexually violent predicate sex offender. The court found that the lower court improperly assessed points for prior convictions, potentially reclassifying the defendant to a presumptive level two offender.

Glowatz v. City of New York - Discrimination Lawsuit Opinion

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York affirmed the dismissal of a discrimination complaint against the City of New York. While the court found the complaint was timely filed, it failed to state a cause of action for discrimination under state or city human rights laws.

Matter of S.G. - Child Neglect Appeal

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York affirmed a Family Court order finding neglect for two children. The court found sufficient evidence of neglect based on a child's statement, caseworker testimony, and photographic evidence of a bruise.

Davidoff Hutcher & Citron LLP v. McLendon - Court Opinion

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York affirmed a judgment against Eric C. McLendon in favor of Davidoff Hutcher & Citron LLP for $178,200.10. The court found that the defendant failed to establish a meritorious defense to the summary judgment motion.

SKYX Group Inc. v. Foundation for Smoke-Free World - Opinion

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York affirmed a lower court's decision to dismiss SKYX Group Inc.'s complaint against the Foundation for a Smoke-Free World. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to state a claim regarding the alleged misuse of their research proposal.

Sachs v. Dominguez - Guardianship Dispute

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York granted a petition to vacate a prior order, reinstating Laura Ann Sachs and Allan Preston Sachs-Ambia as co-Guardians for an incapacitated person. The court also removed the current guardian and ordered the turnover of all records and funds.

People v. Perez - Criminal Appeal

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York affirmed a judgment against Edgardo Perez. The court found the sentence imposed not to be excessive. This decision was published on March 10, 2026.

Matter of T.M. (C.V.) - Child Neglect and Parental Rights Termination

The New York Appellate Division affirmed a Family Court decision terminating a mother's parental rights due to permanent neglect. The court found that the agency made diligent efforts to facilitate reunification, despite the mother's non-compliance with her service plan. The decision upholds the termination of parental rights and transfer of custody for adoption.

Bernstein v. Assaf - Court Opinion

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York affirmed a lower court's decision to confirm an arbitration award and deny a wife's petition to vacate it. The court found no grounds for vacating the award, including claims of arbitrator bias or failure of a condition precedent to arbitration.

People v. White - Appellate Court Decision

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York affirmed a judgment against Shaquille White. The court found the sentence imposed was not excessive. This decision was published on March 10, 2026.

People v. Irving - NY Appellate Division Legal Opinion

The New York Appellate Division affirmed a conviction for burglary and criminal impersonation. The court found that while the lineup identification procedure was unduly suggestive, this error did not warrant overturning the conviction.

People v. Rosario - Criminal Conviction Affirmation

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York affirmed a criminal conviction for Juan Rosario. The court rejected the defendant's argument that his extreme emotional disturbance defense should have been accepted by the jury, finding that while he established the subjective element of loss of self-control, the objective element of a reasonable explanation or excuse was not sufficiently established.

Matter of J.S. (S.A.) - Medical Neglect Ruling

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York affirmed a Family Court ruling that a mother medically neglected her older child and derivatively neglected her younger child. The court found that the mother's delay in consenting to emergency medical treatment for her older son caused impairment or risk of impairment to his condition.

G.K. v. S.T. - Family Law Appeal

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York affirmed a lower court's decision regarding child custody, imputed income, and maintenance in the case of G.K. v. S.T. The court modified the counsel fee award, reducing it by over $267,000.

Figueroa v. Empire Sewer & Water Inc. - Court Opinion

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York issued an opinion in Figueroa v. Empire Sewer & Water Inc. The court modified a lower court's order regarding Labor Law claims and indemnification. The decision clarifies protections for workers injured at construction sites.

Lowman v. Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y., Inc. - Appellate Court Decision

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York affirmed a lower court's decision denying a motion to strike or dismiss a third-party complaint and related requests for sanctions. The case involves a dispute between Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. and Nelson Services Systems, Inc., concerning a confidential letter agreement.

Arnold v. State of Tennessee - Post-Conviction Relief Denial

The Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the denial of post-conviction relief for Kenneth George Arnold, who appealed his rape convictions. The court found no error in the lower court's decision regarding claims of ineffective assistance of counsel.

J.U. v. US Bureau of Prisons - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, J.U. v. US Bureau of Prisons, was filed on March 10, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a complaint against the U.S. Government and the Federal Bureau of Prisons. The filing fee was $405.

AHRQ Health Services Research Projects (R01) PA-24-154 Expired

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) has issued a notice announcing the immediate expiration of Funding Opportunity Announcement PA-24-154 for Health Services Research Projects (R01). No further applications will be accepted under this announcement.

AHRQ Small Health Services Research Grant Program (R03) Expired

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) has issued a notice announcing the immediate expiration of the Small Health Services Research Grant Program (R03) under Funding Opportunity Announcement PA-24-155. No further applications will be accepted for this program.

Digital Healthcare Grant PA-24-266 Expired

The Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality (AHRQ) has issued a notice announcing the early expiration of Funding Opportunity Announcement PA-24-266, which supported innovative digital healthcare solutions. No further applications will be accepted under this announcement.

AHRQ Diagnostic Safety R01 Funding Opportunity PA-23-291 Expired

The Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality (AHRQ) has issued a notice announcing the early expiration of Funding Opportunity Announcement PA-23-291, which focused on understanding and improving diagnostic safety in ambulatory care. No further applications will be accepted under this announcement.

United States v. Zachary Taylor Bush - Non-Precedential Opinion

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction and sentence of Zachary Taylor Bush for illegally possessing firearms as a convicted felon. The court rejected Bush's arguments that his within-Guidelines sentence was procedurally and substantively unreasonable.

Westerling v. E. Tenn. Children's Hosp. Ass'n, Inc. - FLSA Overtime Dispute

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision in Westerling v. E. Tenn. Children's Hosp. Ass'n, Inc., dismissing a Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) overtime claim. The court found that the plaintiff failed to adequately allege that he was not completely relieved of duties during meal breaks.

Fadi Abi Fakhreddine v. Eric Sabree - Court Opinion

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal of a complaint filed by Fadi Fakhreddine and Old Joy Investment Company against Wayne County Treasurer Eric Sabree. The plaintiffs alleged violations of the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause after their properties were foreclosed due to unpaid property taxes.

Brayton Groth v. City of Birmingham, Mich. - Qualified Immunity Appeal

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals is reviewing a denial of qualified immunity for police officers in a case alleging excessive force. The court has jurisdiction over the interlocutory appeal if the officers accept the plaintiff's version of disputed facts and argue they are still entitled to immunity.

Hernandez-Calel v. Bondi - Immigration Habeas Corpus

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals denied Catarina Josefina Hernandez-Calel's petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' decision. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish the requisite nexus between alleged harm and a protected ground for her asylum and withholding of removal claims.

Ortiz Rodriguez v. Bondi - Immigration Habeas Corpus

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a non-precedential opinion in Ortiz Rodriguez v. Bondi, denying a petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals decision. The court affirmed the denial of withholding of removal, finding that the petitioner failed to demonstrate the government's unwillingness or inability to protect him from gang violence.

Mary Bleick v. Sheryl Maxfield - Unclaimed Funds Act Appeal

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision denying a preliminary injunction to prevent the transfer of unclaimed funds to the state of Ohio. The ruling upholds Ohio's Unclaimed Funds Act, which allows funds held for ten years or more to escheat to the state.

Flummerfelt v. City of Taylor - Sovereign Immunity Appeal

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial of sovereign immunity for the Wayne County Treasurer in Flummerfelt v. City of Taylor. The court clarified that the suit was against Wayne County, not its treasurer, rendering the treasurer's sovereign immunity defense irrelevant.

United States v. Denico Hudson - Criminal Appeal

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction and sentencing of Denico Hudson for selling machinegun conversion devices. The court found no error in the district court's application of sentencing enhancements related to the number of devices sold and their connection to other crimes.

United States v. Mohammed Al-Abadi - Sentencing Appeal

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the sentence of Mohammed Al-Abadi, who was convicted of selling and shipping counterfeit airbags. The court found no error in the district court's sentencing decision.

United States v. Stephen Duane Woods, Jr. - Sixth Circuit Court Opinion

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's denial of a motion to suppress evidence in the case of United States v. Stephen Duane Woods, Jr. The court found that officers had probable cause to search the defendant's vehicle based on reports of domestic assault and the presence of a firearm.

United States v. Robert Smith - Sixth Circuit Non-Precedential Opinion

The Sixth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Robert Smith's motion to suppress evidence. Smith was appealing his conviction on federal gun and drug charges, arguing that evidence found in his residence was illegally obtained. The court found no merit in his arguments.

Nakisha West v. Dow Chem. Co. - Employment Discrimination Appeal

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Rohm and Haas Chemical, LLC. The court found that a signed release agreement barred the plaintiff's claims of racial and gender discrimination, retaliation, and hostile work environment.

Bloch v. Bloch - Hawaii Court Opinion

The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals affirmed a divorce decree in Bloch v. Bloch. The court found the appellant's brief lacked the required statement of errors and discernible argument, affirming the lower court's decision. The opinion was filed on March 10, 2026.

State v. Robles - Criminal Appeal

The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals filed an opinion in State v. Robles on March 10, 2026. The case involves an appeal from a district court conviction for Assault in the Third Degree and Mutual Affray. The appellate court reviewed the defendant's contention regarding witness credibility.

SEC Administrative Proceeding Against Rimar Capital for Fraud

The SEC has issued a notice of a proposed plan of distribution for funds collected in an administrative proceeding against Rimar Capital USA, Inc., Rimar Capital, LLC, Itai Royi Liptz, and Clifford Todd Boro. The proceeding found fraudulent conduct related to SAFE offerings and misrepresentations about an AI trading platform, resulting in penalties and disgorgement orders.

FinCEN Geographic Targeting Order for Southwest Border MSBs

The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has issued a Geographic Targeting Order (GTO) imposing recordkeeping and reporting requirements on certain Money Services Businesses (MSBs) along the U.S. Southwest border. This rule specifically targets transactions between $1,000 and $10,000.

Delaware Court of Chancery Dismisses Case for Lack of Jurisdiction

The Delaware Court of Chancery dismissed the case Opulence Pictures LLC et al. v. Hounds of War Malta Ltd et al. (C.A. No. 2023-0702-DG) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The court found that the plaintiffs' claims could be adequately remedied at law, and thus declined to exercise its equitable jurisdiction.

Delaware Court of Chancery Opinion on Damages and Covenants

The Delaware Court of Chancery issued a memorandum opinion in a founder-investor dispute, ruling largely in favor of the plaintiffs. The court awarded $4.304 million in damages against the defendants for breaching contractual obligations and reinstated original restrictive covenant terms. The ruling also addresses counterclaims and partial fee shifting.

Pfizer v. Dexcel Pharma Technologies - Court Opinion on Expert Testimony

The US District Court for the District of Delaware denied a motion by Defendants Cipla Limited and Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. to exclude expert testimony in the patent infringement case Pfizer v. Dexcel Pharma Technologies. The court's memorandum opinion addresses the admissibility of Dr. Adam Matzger's testimony concerning infringement of the '441 patent.

Delaware Court of Chancery Dismisses Joint Venture Dispute Claims

The Delaware Court of Chancery has dismissed claims in a joint venture dispute between Caerus Group, LLC and Chemicar Europe NV. The court granted motions to dismiss filed by Caerus and Mitch Penney, impacting the consolidated civil action concerning Finixa USA, Inc.

Court of Chancery Resolves Contract Interpretation and Fraud Claims

The Delaware Court of Chancery issued a letter opinion resolving a contract interpretation issue concerning a fraud claim under a membership interest purchase agreement. The court found that the fraud claim arose under the contract's indemnification provisions, entering summary judgment for the plaintiffs.

Bloch v Bloch - Divorce Decree Appeal Summary Disposition Order

The Intermediate Court of Appeals of the State of Hawaiʻi affirmed a divorce decree issued by the family court. The court found the appellant's brief lacked the required statement of errors and discernible argument, thus affirming the lower court's decision.

State v. Robles - Summary Disposition Order Affirmed

The Intermediate Court of Appeals of the State of Hawaiʻi affirmed a lower court's decision in State v. Robles. The court reviewed the appellant's contention that the district court erred in finding witnesses credible and relying on that finding to convict Robles of Assault in the Third Degree and Mutual Affray.

A.C. v. United States - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, A.C. v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons) et al, was filed on March 10, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case number is 3:26-cv-02076. The initial filings include a complaint, proposed summons, and motions related to anonymity and proceeding before a US Magistrate Judge.

DiBiccari v. State of Rhode Island - Appeal of Wastewater Regulations

The Supreme Court of Rhode Island affirmed a Superior Court judgment dismissing Nicholas DiBiccari's complaint against the State of Rhode Island. The court found that DiBiccari failed to exhaust administrative remedies regarding the Department of Environmental Management's onsite wastewater treatment system regulations and that his facial constitutional challenges were without merit.

Estate of Campagnone v. State of Rhode Island - Negligence Appeal

The Supreme Court of Rhode Island affirmed a lower court's decision granting summary judgment to the State of Rhode Island in a negligence case. The Estate of Louis Campagnone appealed, arguing the state failed to prove it was immune under the Recreational Use Statute, but the court found no genuine issues of material fact regarding willful or malicious failure to warn.

Iran War Impacts Global Construction Supply Chains

This notice analyzes the global impact of the 2026 Iran War on construction supply chains. The conflict has disrupted critical shipping routes, leading to increased transportation and production costs, delays, and potential surcharges for materials like cement, steel, and aluminum. The analysis highlights the cascading effects on construction projects worldwide.

Data Brokers Face New Compliance Rules from CalPrivacy and FTC

California and the FTC are implementing new compliance rules for data brokers. California's Delete Request and Opt-out Platform (DROP) mechanism is now active, with data deletion requirements starting August 1, 2026. The FTC has also issued warnings regarding the Protecting Americans' Data from Foreign Adversaries Act (PADFAA).

CNIPA Stops Notifying Local Agents for Madrid Designations

The Chinese National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) has ceased notifying local Chinese trademark agents for international trademarks designating China via the Madrid System. CNIPA now only serves the WIPO-recorded representative or the trademark holder directly, requiring proactive monitoring by rights holders and their representatives to avoid missing response deadlines.

Court of International Trade Pauses IEEPA Refunds

The U.S. Court of International Trade has paused the immediate refund of duties imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) while leaving the underlying obligation to refund intact. This decision acknowledges practical limitations faced by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) in processing an estimated $166 billion in refunds for over 330,000 importers.

DOJ Trade Fraud Task Force Revisits FDCA Charges

The DOJ's Trade Fraud Task Force, established six months ago, has announced its leading prosecutorial partner, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Illinois. This move signals an increased focus on enforcing the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) in trade fraud cases, building on past successful prosecutions involving honey import schemes.

Court Orders Removal of IEEPA Tariffs on U.S. Imports

The U.S. Court of International Trade has ordered the government to remove International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) tariffs on U.S. imports, following a Supreme Court decision. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) indicated it could begin issuing refunds within 45 days, though importers are advised to monitor liquidation entries and file protests.

Section 122 Tariffs Challenged in U.S. Court of International Trade

24 states have filed a lawsuit in the U.S. Court of International Trade challenging the Section 122 tariffs imposed by President Trump on February 20, 2026. The states argue the conditions for invoking Section 122 were not met and the tariffs exceed the statute's scope. This case is expected to be expedited.

CIT Suspends IEEPA Duty Refund Order for CBP ACE Functionality

The U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) has suspended its order requiring immediate refunds of IEEPA duties. This suspension allows U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) time to develop new Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) functionality to process these refunds, estimated to be implemented in 45 days. Importers are advised to complete electronic refund setup and consider filing protests.

Italian SMEs Bill Expands Inventory Financing Securitizations

The Italian Senate approved an annual SMEs Bill on March 4, 2026, amending Law 130 to expand structuring options for inventory financing securitizations. The changes allow for foreign originators and multijurisdiction asset pools, enhancing Italy's position in the international ABS market.

Arizona Court Opinion on Parental Rights

The Arizona Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision to terminate a mother's parental rights. The decision was based on the mother's history of substance abuse and neglect, as well as the child's exposure to substances at birth. This is a non-precedential decision.

M.A. v. T.D. - Abuse Prevention Order Extension

The Massachusetts Appeals Court affirmed the extension of an abuse prevention order against T.D. The court found that the plaintiff established sufficient grounds for the extension, despite the defendant's arguments regarding imminent danger. The decision is a non-precedential summary order.

B.B. v. Capistrano Unified School District - First Amendment Student Speech

The Ninth Circuit vacated a district court's grant of summary judgment in B.B. v. Capistrano Unified School District, holding that elementary students' speech is protected by the First Amendment under the Tinker standard. The court remanded the case, finding genuine disputes of material fact regarding whether the school principal's actions were reasonably necessary to prevent disruption or protect other students.

Rojas-Espinoza v. Bondi - Motion to Stay Removal Denied

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied a motion to stay removal for petitioners Rojas-Espinoza and others in their case against Pamela Bondi. The court lifted a temporary stay of removal, effective immediately. A concurring opinion addressed procedural concerns regarding the court's handling of stay practices.

Deras v. Johnson & Johnson - FLSA Unpaid Wages Case

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the district court's dismissal of Francisco Deras's FLSA unpaid wages case against Johnson & Johnson. The appellate court remanded the case for further proceedings, finding the district court's interpretation of local rules and precedent regarding attorney procedural errors to be overly broad.

Bat Surveys at JBER Funding Opportunity

The Fort Worth District of the US Army Corps of Engineers has issued a funding opportunity for bat surveys at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson (JBER). The opportunity, with an award range of $66,000 to $206,025, is open to Cooperative Ecosystem Study Units and has a closing date of April 10, 2026.

Genetic Analysis Opportunity at Vandenberg Space Force Base

The US Army Corps of Engineers, Fort Worth District, has announced a funding opportunity for genetic analysis of the Gaviota Tarplant at Vandenberg Space Force Base, CA. The opportunity is open to Cooperative Ecosystem Study Units and has an estimated award range of $168,000 to $522,000.

EPA Seeks Coordination Support for Chesapeake Bay Program Advisory Committees

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is seeking applications for a cooperative agreement to provide coordination support for the Chesapeake Bay Program's four Advisory Committees. The award is valued at $2,450,000 and aims to increase engagement of key sectors in restoration and conservation efforts.

S.B.01 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al - Personal Injury Product Liability

A new civil case, S.B.01 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al, has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, bearing number 3:26-cv-02064, is based on diversity jurisdiction and involves a claim of personal injury product liability. The initial complaint and related documents were filed on March 10, 2026.