United States — March 6, 2026

Jayla Anderson v. Advantix Development Corporation - Eviction Record Sealing

The Indiana Court of Appeals reversed and remanded a trial court's decision denying a petition to seal eviction records. The appellate court found prima facie error in the trial court's denial, potentially impacting how eviction records are handled in Indiana.

Guilfoyle v. State of Indiana - Criminal Appeal

The Indiana Court of Appeals issued an opinion in the case of Gregory C. Guilfoyle v. State of Indiana. The court affirmed the conviction and sentence of Guilfoyle, who was found guilty but mentally ill of eight offenses related to shooting his wife and a deputy sheriff. The case was remanded with instructions.

Zachary Matthew Loveless v. State of Indiana - Criminal Appeal

The Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's decision denying a defendant's motion to correct error regarding credit time for jail incarceration. The court found the defendant was not entitled to credit time toward his Hancock County sentence for time spent in Marion and Hamilton County jails.

Cleary v. Morlan - Mechanic's Lien Foreclosure Appeal

The Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed and remanded a mechanic's lien foreclosure case. The court found that the trial court did not err in foreclosing the lien and will consider appellate attorney fees. The case involves a dispute over payment for electrical work on a new house.

California AG Warns Baby Food Companies on Heavy Metal Disclosure

California Attorney General Rob Bonta issued an enforcement advisory to baby food companies regarding disclosure requirements for heavy metals under Assembly Bill 899. The advisory warns companies that current disclosure methods may not comply with the law, potentially leading to retailers being prohibited from selling products in California.

IRS Proposed Rule: Electronic Furnishing of Digital Asset Sales Statements

The Internal Revenue Service has issued a proposed rule regarding the electronic furnishing of payee statements for digital asset sales by brokers. This proposal outlines new requirements for brokers to provide tax statements electronically to customers regarding their digital asset transactions.

OFAC Removes Russia-Related Entity from SDN List

The US Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has removed GLOBE TREKKERS LLC from the Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) List. This action is a designation removal under Executive Order 14024, with a related license issued for the United Arab Emirates.

People v. Del Rosario-Martinez - Criminal Conviction Appeal

The Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York affirmed a conviction for driving while impaired and leaving the scene of an incident. The court found the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence, upholding the lower court's judgment.

Verizon Pennsylvania LLC v. Prevailing Wage Board - Court Opinion

The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania affirmed the Prevailing Wage Appeals Board's order denying Verizon's grievance. The court addressed whether the Secretary of Labor and Industry properly authorized the Bureau of Labor Law Compliance and whether the Secretary abused her discretion in setting the electric lineman rate for fiber optic cable deployment.

J. Ellman v. PPB - Parole Board Decision Appeal

The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania affirmed a decision by the Pennsylvania Parole Board denying a petitioner's request for administrative relief. The court granted the petitioner's counsel's application to withdraw, finding the appeal lacked merit. The decision relates to parole revocation and sentence recalculation.

Drowsy Driving Risk Warning Due to Daylight Saving Time

The New York State Department of Motor Vehicles has issued a warning to motorists about the increased risk of drowsy driving associated with the start of Daylight Saving Time. The notice advises drivers to be aware of potential fatigue and take precautions to ensure safety on the road.

Medical malpractice appeal over expert witness qualification

Medical malpractice appeal over expert witness qualification

Iowa Supreme Court Opinion on Garnishment of Independent Contractor Funds

The Iowa Supreme Court ruled that Iowa Code section 642.21(1), which limits garnishment of an 'employee's' earnings, does not apply to funds owed to independent contractors. The court affirmed in part and reversed in part a lower court decision regarding the garnishment of funds owed to Mashon Van Mill.

Green Belt Bank & Trust v. Van Mill - Garnishment Order Limit Appeal

The Iowa Supreme Court has published its opinion in the case of Green Belt Bank & Trust v. Stephanie Marie Van Mill et al. The appeal concerned the application of Iowa Code section 642.21(1)(e) to limit the amount a judgment creditor could recover through garnishment. The court affirmed the lower court's decision.

Jones v. Lindell - Medical Malpractice Expert Witness Qualification

The Iowa Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's decision to strike a plaintiff's expert witness in a medical malpractice case. The court found the expert, a urologist, was not qualified to testify on the standard of care for an obstetrician-gynecologist under Iowa Code section 147.139. This ruling impacts how expert witnesses are qualified in medical malpractice suits in Iowa.

NY AG Statement on Housing Discrimination Lawsuit Ruling

New York Attorney General Letitia James released a statement on a ruling concerning source of income protections for renters. The ruling by the New York Appellate Division, Third Judicial Department, impacts housing discrimination lawsuits.

State AGs Sue Trump Administration Over Illegal Tariffs

New York Attorney General Letitia James, leading a coalition of 21 states and two governors, has sued the Trump administration to block new tariffs imposed under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. The lawsuit argues these tariffs are illegal and violate the separation of powers, seeking a court order to declare them unlawful and issue refunds for costs paid by states.

Stewart v. Lee - Texas Court of Appeals Opinion Affirmed

The Texas Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision in Stewart v. Lee. The appellate court upheld the trial court's order granting Sharon Lee's Application for Issuance of Turnover Order and awarding attorney's fees to Lee. The Stewarts' various claims against Lee were dismissed.

Schiaffo v. State of Texas - Mandamus Case Denied

The Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District, denied a petition for writ of mandamus filed by William and Reba Schiaffo. The relators contended the trial court abused its discretion in resolving a discovery and sanctions dispute. The court found no abuse of discretion and denied the petition.

Pascual Torres v. Texas - Aggravated Sexual Assault Affirmed

The Texas Court of Appeals affirmed a conviction for aggravated sexual assault of a child and indecency with a child. The appellant's sole issue on appeal, regarding the admission of extraneous-offense testimony, was waived due to inadequate briefing.

Marcos Antonio Rios v. State of Texas - Aggravated Robbery

The Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District, affirmed the conviction of Marcos Antonio Rios for aggravated robbery. The court assessed his punishment at fifty-five years confinement. The appeal concerned the admission of evidence of an extraneous act.

Texas Court of Appeals Dismisses Parental Rights Case

The Texas Court of Appeals dismissed an appeal in the case of In the Interest of A.C. and L.C. v. the State of Texas. The dismissal was based on a lack of appellate jurisdiction, as the order being appealed was neither a final judgment nor an appealable interlocutory order.

City Wide Franchise Company v. State of Texas - Mandamus

The Texas Court of Appeals denied City Wide Franchise Company's petition for a writ of mandamus. The court refused to compel the trial court to enforce a forum-selection clause, allowing premises liability and negligence claims to proceed in Texas.

In Re J.C. Juvenile v. State of Texas - Mandamus

The Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District, dismissed a petition for a writ of mandamus filed by Bobby Kirby in the case of In Re J.C., a Juvenile v. the State of Texas. The court found the petition and related motion for emergency relief to be moot. The case was originally filed as a mandamus action.

Cheyenne Partners v. Rainbow International - Contract Dispute

The Texas Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's judgment in a contract dispute between Cheyenne Partners and Rainbow International concerning a franchise agreement. The court found that the appellants breached their contract and abandoned their franchise, upholding the award of damages to the appellees.

Ex Parte Tasha Nicole Roy v. the State of Texas - Habeas Corpus

The Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District, dismissed the case of Ex Parte Tasha Nicole Roy v. the State of Texas. The dismissal was granted following the appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal as moot, which was filed before a decision was rendered.

Daniel Joseph Georgianni v. the State of Texas - Interference With Public Duties

The Texas Court of Appeals affirmed a conviction for Interference with Public Duties. The appellant was found guilty of refusing to exit a vehicle during a traffic stop, resulting in a $2,000 fine. The court addressed arguments regarding the police officer's oath of office.

Antoine DeGrate v. State of Texas - Dismissed Appeal

The Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District, dismissed the appeal of Antoine Demetruis DeGrate. The court found it lacked jurisdiction over the case, which involved a failure to register as a sex offender. The dismissal was based on the untimeliness of the appeal and the nature of the claims presented.

Generoso Polendey Taclibon v. State of Texas - Sex Offense Conviction Affirmed

The Texas Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Generoso Polendey Taclibon for a first-degree felony offense of continuous sexual abuse of a young child. The court found no merit in Taclibon's arguments regarding excluded evidence, false testimony, and the denial of a new trial.

Julia Ann Poff v. Gina Annette Dare - Case Dismissed

The Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District, has dismissed the appeal in Julia Ann Poff v. Gina Annette Dare. The dismissal is due to the appellant's failure to file a required brief following the notice of appeal.

Court Grants Anonymity for Inmates Alleging Sexual Misconduct

The District Court for the District of Colorado granted a motion for anonymity for inmates alleging sexual misconduct in a consolidated civil action. The court's decision pertains to case numbers 1:25-cv-02763 and 1:25-cv-02531.

Miller v. Stevens - Colorado Court Denies Sanctions

The U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado denied a motion for sanctions filed by the plaintiff in Miller v. Stevens. The court found that the defendant's motion to dismiss was a required response to the plaintiff's amended complaint.

Delbert Elmer Sgaggio Jr. v. Keeley Deback et al. - Service Motion Denied

The District Court for the District of Colorado denied a motion for alternative service on Defendant Lambert and granted a 60-day extension for service, setting a new deadline of May 1, 2026. This order addresses procedural aspects of the ongoing civil action.

Lee v. Millington - Custody Dispute Appeal

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued a non-precedential decision affirming a trial court's final custody order. The order granted shared legal custody, primary physical custody to the mother, and partial physical custody to the father for their child. The appeal was filed by the father.

Com. v. Holly, M. - Criminal Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a non-precedential decision affirming a lower court's judgment of sentence for Marcus K. Holly. The appeal challenged the denial of a pretrial motion to dismiss charges under Rule 600, concerning the timeliness of proceedings.

Com. v. Brown - Appeal of PCRA Dismissal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court affirmed the dismissal of Floyd Brown's petition for habeas corpus relief, which was treated as an untimely Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA) petition. The court found that Brown failed to plead or prove any timeliness exceptions to the PCRA requirements.

Commonwealth v. Bertanzetti - Criminal Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court reviewed a criminal appeal filed by Ryan Adam Bertanzetti. The court found merit in the appellant's claim regarding restitution and vacated the judgments of sentence, remanding for resentencing on that specific ground. The original sentence included 11 to 22 years imprisonment and $5,840 in restitution.

Com. v. Griffin, R. - Criminal Appeal

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania vacated the judgment of sentence and reversed the conviction of Rashan M. Griffin for careless driving. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the appellant drove in careless disregard for safety.

Commonwealth v. Lester - Criminal Appeal

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued a non-precedential decision in the case of Commonwealth v. Lester. The court affirmed the judgment of sentence for appellant Tequilla Lester, who was convicted of strangulation and simple assault, addressing her claim that the trial court erred in accepting her jury trial waiver.

Com. v. Schreffler, J. - DUI Case Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court is reviewing an appeal by the Commonwealth regarding a trial court's order that denied a continuance and granted a motion to suppress evidence in a DUI case against Jonathan Michael Schreffler. The appeal concerns the Commonwealth's failure to secure the presence of an essential witness.

Pennsylvania Superior Court non-precedential opinion Com. v. Moore

Pennsylvania Superior Court non-precedential opinion Com. v. Moore

Linn v. Perrotti - Appeal of Order Dismissing Complaint

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania vacated and remanded an order that dismissed a husband's complaint against his wife concerning alleged non-disclosure of assets during divorce proceedings. The court found that the dismissal of the complaint was improper and required further proceedings.

Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Algeria: Final Determination of Sales Below Fair Value

The International Trade Administration has issued a final affirmative determination that steel concrete reinforcing bar from Algeria is being sold at less than fair value. This determination is based on sales at dumping margins, initiating potential antidumping duties.

Oil Country Tubular Goods from Türkiye: Preliminary Countervailing Duty Results

The Department of Commerce's International Trade Administration has published preliminary results for the countervailing duty administrative review of oil country tubular goods from Türkiye. This notice details the preliminary findings for the 2023 review period.

Cold-Rolled Steel from Korea: Preliminary Antidumping Review

The International Trade Administration published the preliminary results of its administrative review of certain cold-rolled steel flat products from the Republic of Korea for the 2023-2024 period. This notice also details the rescission, in part, of the review.

International Trade Commission: Investigation of Laptops, Routers, and Gateways

The International Trade Commission has instituted an investigation into alleged infringement related to certain laptops, routers, gateways, and their components. This notice formally begins the investigation process under Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930.

Ferrovanadium Antidumping Duty Orders from China and South Africa Continued

The International Trade Administration has published a notice regarding the continuation of antidumping duty orders on ferrovanadium from China and South Africa. This notice confirms the ongoing application of these existing trade measures.

L-lysine from China: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value

The International Trade Administration has issued a preliminary affirmative determination that imports of L-lysine from the People's Republic of China are being sold at less than fair value. This notice also postpones the final determination and extends provisional measures.

Aluminum Sheet from South Africa: Final Antidumping Duty Review

The International Trade Administration has published the final results of the administrative review of antidumping duties on common alloy aluminum sheet from South Africa for the 2023-2024 period. This notice confirms the final duty rates determined by the agency.

FAA Amends Domestic VOR Airways in Eastern US

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has proposed amendments to domestic Very High Frequency Omnidirectional Range (VOR) federal airways in the Eastern United States. The proposed changes affect several VOR airways, including V-16, V-35, and V-37. Public comments on this proposed rule are due by April 20, 2026.

Modification of Class E Airspace; Ketchikan International Airport, Ketchikan, AK

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is modifying Class E airspace at Ketchikan International Airport in Ketchikan, Alaska. This rule amends airspace designations to support Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations. The changes are effective May 14, 2026.

FAA Adopts Airworthiness Directive for Airbus H160-B Helicopters

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has adopted a new airworthiness directive concerning Airbus H160-B helicopters. This rule introduces new safety requirements for the operation of these aircraft.

FAA Airworthiness Directive for MHI RJ Aviation ULC Airplanes

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has issued an airworthiness directive (AD) superseding a previous directive for MHI RJ Aviation ULC airplanes, previously under Bombardier, Inc. This rule establishes new requirements for these aircraft.

USITC Continues Investigations on Citric Acid from Canada and India

The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has voted to continue investigations into citric acid and certain citrate salts imported from Canada and India. The USITC found a reasonable indication that U.S. industries are materially injured by these imports, which are allegedly sold below fair value and subsidized by their governments.

Re/Max Prestige v. Mattson - Breach of Contract Appeal

The Idaho Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's judgment awarding damages, interest, costs, and attorney fees for breach of contract in the case of Re/Max Prestige, Daren Long v. Susan L. Mattson. The appeal concerned a seller-representation agreement and subsequent property sale negotiations.

State v. King - Idaho Court of Appeals Opinion

The Idaho Court of Appeals filed an opinion in State v. King on March 6, 2026, affirming a judgment of conviction for possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. The court found substantial evidence supported the probable cause for the search warrant, and the information was not stale.

Florida Awards $9M for Workforce and Infrastructure Development

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis awarded over $9 million in grants for workforce and infrastructure development. The funding will support a new Commercial Driver's License training facility in Bradford County and roadway construction for an industrial site in Nassau County. Nassau County was also designated a Rural Area of Opportunity.

Visa Restrictions for Undermining Great Lakes Peace

The Department of State has imposed visa restrictions on several senior Rwandan officials for fueling instability in eastern DRC and violating the Washington Accords. This action targets individuals undermining peace in the Great Lakes Region, pursuant to Section 212(a)(3)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act.

T.H. and R.H. v. D.C.C. and Re.H. - Civil Appeals Opinion

The Alabama Court of Civil Appeals released an opinion in T.H. and R.H. v. D.C.C. and Re.H. on March 6, 2026. The court reversed a juvenile court judgment concerning child custody and paternity, remanding the case with instructions.

Jessica Bugge v. Jeb S. Fannin - Civil Appeals Opinion

The Alabama Court of Civil Appeals released an opinion regarding Jessica Bugge's appeal of a contempt order issued by Judge Jeb S. Fannin. The court affirmed in part and reversed in part the order finding Bugge in contempt for failing to attend a trial.

R.G.W. v. H.R.A. - Alabama Court Opinion

The Alabama Court of Civil Appeals released an opinion in R.G.W. v. H.R.A. on March 6, 2026. The case involves a dispute over child custody and paternity, originating from a settlement agreement filed in 2021. The court's opinion addresses jurisdictional issues and the legal status of the child's father.

Matter of Cardillo - Attorney Disciplinary Proceedings

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York has issued an opinion in the Matter of Christopher Scott Cardillo. The case involves disciplinary proceedings against an attorney accused of professional misconduct, specifically the conversion and/or misappropriation of entrusted funds totaling over $4.7 million.

Funding Available for Safe Digging Education and Awareness

The Colorado Department of Labor and Employment's Division of Oil and Public Safety is accepting applications for grants from the Damage Prevention Fund to support safe digging education. This fund, derived from fines for violating the Excavation Requirements Law, aims to prevent underground facility damage and ensure public safety. Up to $20,000 in grants will be awarded.

G. v. Lyft, Inc. - Civil Case Filing

A civil case, G. v. Lyft, Inc., was filed on February 19, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves claims of Assault, Libel & Slander. A recent filing on March 6, 2026, was a motion for leave to appear Pro Hac Vice.

US and Mexico Launch USMCA Joint Review Discussions

The United States and Mexico have initiated the joint review process for the USMCA. Discussions will focus on reducing regional dependence, strengthening rules of origin, and enhancing supply chain security. Negotiators are scheduled to hold their first meeting the week of March 16, 2026.

Horazdovsky v. Horazdovsky - Child Custody Appeal

The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision to change primary physical custody of three children from the mother to the father. The court found that the trial court's decision was supported by the evidence presented regarding the children's best interests.

Thomas Tarhanich v. Memberselect Insurance Company - Insurance Benefits

The Michigan Court of Appeals reversed and remanded a trial court's dismissal of a personal protection insurance (PIP) benefits case. The appellate court found that the trial court erred in granting summary disposition to Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company, potentially impacting how PIP benefits are claimed under the state's no-fault act.

Coleman v. Magni Industries Inc - Employment Dispute

The Michigan Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the case of Martaz Coleman v. Magni Industries Inc. The court reconsidered the case in light of a Supreme Court decision, impacting the interpretation of employment agreements and statutes of limitations.

Warren Consolidated School District v School District of the City of Hazel Park

The Michigan Supreme Court issued an opinion in a dispute between two school districts over pupil enrollment and state funding. The case involves claims of unjust enrichment and challenges to state audits under the State School Aid Act. The court's decision clarifies the process for resolving such funding disputes.

Nebraska Supreme Court Opinion

The Nebraska Supreme Court has issued a new opinion document. This document is available through the Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library. The opinion was published on March 6, 2026.

State v. Damore - Nebraska Supreme Court Opinion

The Nebraska Supreme Court has issued an opinion in the case of State v. Damore. The opinion was published on March 6, 2026, and provides a judicial review of the case proceedings and rulings.

Nebraska Supreme Court Opinion

The Nebraska Supreme Court has issued a new opinion document, available through the state's online library. This document represents a final judicial decision on a legal matter, adding to the body of state case law.

Flores v. Flores - Appeal Withdrawn

The Court of Appeals of Georgia has granted the appellant's motion to withdraw the appeal in Vincent Joseph Flores v. Katherine Leigh Flores. Jurisdiction has been released back to the trial court. This action formally terminates the appellate proceedings.

Georgia Court of Appeals Denies Discretionary Application

The Georgia Court of Appeals has denied a discretionary application in the case of In the Interest of B. D. F. B. et al., Children (Mother). The docket number for this case is A26D0342. This denial means the case will not proceed to a full appeal on the merits at this stage.

Shacarr Harden v. Solstice Morningside LLC - Case Transfer

The Court of Appeals of Georgia has transferred the case of Shacarr Harden v. Solstice Morningside LLC to the appropriate state or superior court. The court determined it lacked jurisdiction over the appeal from a magistrate court judgment.

Georgia Court of Appeals Denies Discretionary Appeal in Children's Case

The Georgia Court of Appeals has denied a discretionary application for appeal in the case In the Interest of B. D. F. B. et al., Children (Father). The docket number for this case is A26D0344. This decision means the prior ruling stands.

Russian charged with laundering $1.2M from $400M Medicare fraud

Russian charged with laundering $1.2M from $400M Medicare fraud

Bangladeshi national extradited for child exploitation, sextortion charges

Bangladeshi national extradited for child exploitation, sextortion charges

Sanjay Kumar sentenced 43 months for selling counterfeit cancer drug

Sanjay Kumar sentenced 43 months for selling counterfeit cancer drug

Hawaii couple convicted of tax refund fraud conspiracy

Hawaii couple convicted of tax refund fraud conspiracy

Executive admits concealing patient deaths, company agrees to DPA

Executive admits concealing patient deaths, company agrees to DPA

People v. Nelson - Criminal Case Search Results

This document provides search results for the criminal case People v. Nelson, case number B342722, in the 2nd Appellate District of California. The results link to specific court filings and case information for the defendant.

People v. Uceda - Criminal Appeal

The People of the State of California filed an appeal in the case of People v. Uceda, case number A168345, with the 1st Appellate District. The filing date for this appellate action was July 19, 2023.

Torres Campo v. Munoz - Appellate Case D085584

This document pertains to the appellate case D085584, Torres Campo v. Munoz, filed on January 13, 2025. It is a standard court filing related to an ongoing civil litigation matter.

Las Posas Valley Water Rights Coalition v. Fox Canyon Groundwater Management Agency

The Appellate District 2 court has docketed case B330837, involving the Las Posas Valley Water Rights Coalition and the Fox Canyon Groundwater Management Agency. The case was filed on August 7, 2023, with oral arguments scheduled for January 14, 2026.

People v. Superior Court Los Angeles County - Criminal Case

The California Courts of Appeal, 2nd Appellate District, has issued case information for 'The People v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County et al.' (Case No. B346062). The filing date was May 9, 2025, with oral arguments scheduled for September 16, 2025.

State v. Hernandez - Arizona Rape Shield Law Evidence Ruling

The Arizona Court of Appeals ruled that a subsection of the state's Rape Shield Law, A.R.S. § 13-1421(A)(2), which allows evidence of a victim's sexual conduct to show the source of trauma, does not apply to mental or emotional trauma, only physical trauma. This ruling impacts the admissibility of certain evidence in sex offense trials.

Medline Industries Recalls Catheters Due to Particulates and Infection Risk

The FDA has identified a Medline Industries catheter recall as the most serious type due to potential particulates causing infection or embolism. Affected product lots must be destroyed. This is an expansion of a previous recall.

CDPHE Launches Environmental Justice Grants Dashboard

The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) has launched a new interactive dashboard for its Environmental Justice Grant Program. The dashboard provides transparency on how grant funding is being used to address environmental issues and improve community health across Colorado.

Colorado Campaign Promotes Tax Credits to Reduce Child Poverty

The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment has relaunched its Get Ahead Colorado campaign to encourage families to file taxes and claim state and federal tax credits. Research indicates these credits can reduce child poverty in Colorado by 37%. The campaign provides resources for free tax filing assistance and tax credit estimation.

Marianita M. v. Frank Bisignano - Social Security Benefits Appeal

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois denied Marianita M.'s motion for summary judgment and granted the Commissioner of Social Security's motion, affirming the denial of her application for disabled widow's benefits and supplemental security income. The court found the ALJ's decision to be supported by substantial evidence.

Papa v. Green and Community First Healthcare - Racial Harassment Claim

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois granted summary judgment for defendants in a racial harassment case. Plaintiff Manoj Papa alleged violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1981 against Edward J. Green and Community First Healthcare of Illinois, Inc. The court found insufficient evidence to proceed to trial.

Gina Marino-Kalish v. Menard, Inc. - Negligence Case

The Northern District of Illinois issued a court opinion in Gina Marino-Kalish v. Menard, Inc. The court granted Menard's motion for summary judgment in a negligence case where the plaintiff was injured by falling pruning sets. The opinion details the background of the incident and the court's reasoning for granting the motion.

Tara Hudson v. Buehler Moving and Storage - Opinion Denying Motion to Vacate

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois denied Tara Hudson's motion to vacate a previous judgment dismissing her case with prejudice. The court found that the plaintiff, proceeding pro se, failed to state any viable claims in her amended complaint, despite multiple opportunities.

Dillard II v. City of Chicago - Civil Rights Lawsuit Opinion

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois issued a legal opinion in the case of Tyrone Dillard II v. City of Chicago, et al. The court granted the defendants' motion to dismiss the plaintiff's complaint alleging violations of Fourth Amendment rights.

Rehabilitation Services Administration Training Program Payback System

The Department of Education's Rehabilitation Services Administration (RSA) is requesting public comment on proposed revisions to the information collection requirements for the Rehabilitation Long-Term Training (RLTT) Program Payback Information Management System (PIMS). The comment period ends on May 5, 2026.

GAO Report on Cybersecurity Regulation Harmonization

The GAO has released a report highlighting industry perspectives on the challenges and opportunities in harmonizing federal cybersecurity regulations for critical infrastructure. The report identifies redundancies and conflicts arising from overlapping regulations, impacting private sector entities responsible for essential services.

Juan Dario Lopez License Revocation by DFI

The Washington State Department of Financial Institutions (DFI) has issued a Consent Order revoking the check casher license of Juan Dario Lopez (NMLS #1463739). The revocation is stayed for two years, contingent on compliance with the terms of the order.

Noble Escrow Services LLC - Temporary Cease and Desist Order

The Washington State Department of Financial Institutions issued a temporary cease and desist order against Noble Escrow Services LLC on March 2, 2026. The order requires the company to immediately deposit funds to cover a deficit in its trust account, cease accepting new business, and continue processing existing transactions without harming customers.

Sheet Metal Workers Pension Trust v. Freight Train Refrigeration - ERISA Labor Dispute

A new civil case, Sheet Metal Workers Pension Trust of Northern California et al v. Freight Train Refrigeration, Inc., was filed on March 6, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case is based on a Federal Question and concerns Labor: E.R.I.S.A.

District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Easy Commercial Flooring, Inc.

A new labor ERISA case, District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Easy Commercial Flooring, Inc., was filed on March 6, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a complaint related to ERISA. The filing initiates a legal proceeding with potential implications for employers regarding employee benefit plans.

Christopher Coy Gamble v. State of Arkansas - Criminal Appeal

The Arkansas Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's decision in the case of Christopher Coy Gamble v. State of Arkansas. The court ruled on two arguments presented by the appellant regarding the denial of his motion to suppress a custodial statement and the denial of his motion to strike a venire panel. The appellant was found guilty of capital murder and aggravated residential burglary.

W. Henry Hardy Inc. - Enforcement Meeting

The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) has scheduled an enforcement meeting for W. Henry Hardy Inc. on March 25, 2026. This action follows unresolved compliance issues identified during an underground storage tank inspection in March 2025, leading to a delivery prohibition process.

Midway Grocery Enforcement Meeting Scheduled

The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) has scheduled an enforcement meeting for Midway Grocery on March 18, 2026, regarding unresolved compliance issues with underground storage tanks. This action follows inspections conducted in April 2024 and November 2025.

NHTSA Seeks Comments on Personal Electronic Device Distraction Data Collection

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has issued a notice and request for comment regarding the collection of data on personal electronic device distraction. This consultation period is open for 60 days, closing on May 5, 2026.

California Measles Cases Prompt Vaccination Urgency

The California Department of Public Health (CDPH) reported six measles cases in Sacramento and Placer counties, marking the third outbreak in the state this year. CDPH is urging residents to ensure they are fully vaccinated against measles and is working with local health officials to manage potential exposures.

Utility Docket Filing Workshop on Regulation Review

The Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO) is hosting a workshop on March 9, 2026, to discuss the review of Ohio Administrative Code 4901:1-35. This event is part of an ongoing regulatory review process for utility regulations.

OFAC Venezuela Removals and Russia General License Update

The Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has removed certain entities and vessels from the Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) List related to Venezuela. Additionally, OFAC issued an amended Russia-related General License 129A, authorizing certain transactions involving Rosneft Deutschland GmbH and RN Refining & Marketing GmbH.

OFAC Issues Russia Oil License and Amends Venezuela Oil FAQ

The US Department of the Treasury's OFAC has issued Russia-related General License 133, authorizing the delivery and sale of Russian crude oil loaded on vessels as of March 5, 2026, to India. OFAC also amended a Venezuela-related FAQ concerning the resale of Venezuelan oil to Cuba.

Presidential Message on Boston Massacre Anniversary

The White House issued a presidential message on March 5, 2026, commemorating the 256th anniversary of the Boston Massacre. The message reflects on the event's historical significance as a catalyst for American independence and honors those who have sacrificed for liberty.

Alan Javon Morris v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal

The District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the lower court's decision in the case of Alan Javon Morris v. State of Florida. The appeal, docketed as 5D2025-0110, concerned a criminal matter.

Robert Dye v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision in Robert Dye v. State of Florida. The appeal concerned an order denying a motion filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. The court's disposition was 'Affirmed'.

Rheal v. Department of Revenue - Case Affirmation

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision in Shawn Rheal v. Department of Revenue o/b/o Cindy Barnes. The case, identified by docket number 4D2025-1372, pertains to a matter handled by the State of Florida, Department of Revenue. No brief was filed by the appellee.

Suffield v. State of Florida - Affirmation of Lower Court Ruling

The Fifth District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the lower court's decision in Christopher William Suffield, Sr. v. State of Florida. The appellate court issued its disposition on March 5, 2026, with no further motions pending.

Kelvin McCray v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal

The District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the lower court's decision in the case of Kelvin McCray v. State of Florida. The appeal, docketed as 5D2025-2206, concerned a criminal matter. The court's disposition was to affirm the prior ruling.

Larrico Antwan Smith v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal

The District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the lower court's decision in the criminal appeal case of Larrico Antwan Smith v. State of Florida. The docket number for this appeal is 5D2024-2369.

Robert Louis Joynt v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision in the case of Robert Louis Joynt v. State of Florida. The appeal concerned post-conviction relief related to multiple felony cases. The court's disposition was an affirmation of the trial court's ruling.

Williams Jr. v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal

The District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the lower court's decision in Lawrence Albert Williams Jr. v. State of Florida. The case, identified by docket number 5D2025-2756, involved a criminal appeal.

Florida Standardbred Breeders & Owners Association, Inc. v. PPI, INC.

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court's decision in the case of Florida Standardbred Breeders & Owners Association, Inc. v. PPI, INC. The appeal was filed under docket number 4D2025-0605. The court's disposition was 'Affirmed'.

Woliner v. CSMC Trust - Florida District Court of Appeal Ruling

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court's decision in the case of Kenneth Woliner v. CSMC 2019-RPL11 Trust. The appellate court's disposition was 'Affirmed', indicating no change to the original ruling.

Robert Woodard v. Katia Mattos - Civil Appeal

The Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, affirmed a lower county court's decision in the civil case Robert Woodard v. Katia Mattos and KM Endodontics PLLC. The appeal, docketed as 4D2025-0068, resulted in the affirmation of the original disposition.

Eric T. Frazier v. State of Florida - Appellate Opinion

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision in the case of Eric T. Frazier v. State of Florida. The appellate court issued its opinion on March 5, 2026, with docket number 5D2024-3196.

Sincere v. Denis - Florida District Court of Appeal Opinion

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court's decision in the case of Rosemene Sincere v. Lindsley Denis and Rachele Denis. The appeal, docketed as 4D2025-1959, resulted in the disposition of 'Affirmed'. No briefs were filed by the appellee.

Osborne v. Bonanni - Florida DCA Opinion Affirmed

The Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, affirmed a lower court's decision in the case of Ashley Catherine Osborne v. Marzio Bonanni. The appeal concerned nonfinal orders from the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County. The court's disposition was 'Affirmed'.

Rappel v. Wright - Florida DCA Affirms Lower Court Decision

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court's decision in Rappel v. Wright. The case involved a dispute related to the estate of Kenneth A. Wright and English Oak Investments, Inc. The appellate court's disposition was 'Affirmed'.

Zimmerman v. McClure - Appellate Court Decision

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision in Zimmerman v. McClure. The appellate court issued its ruling on March 5, 2026, in case number 4D2024-3210. This decision pertains to a civil dispute between the named parties.

Fairouz Guerrouj v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. - Appellate Court Opinion

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court's decision in the case of Fairouz Guerrouj v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. The appellate court issued its opinion on March 5, 2026, with docket number 4D2024-3183. The disposition of the case was affirmed.

David Lee Davis v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal

The District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the lower court's decision in the case of David Lee Davis v. State of Florida. The appeal, identified by docket number 5D2025-1964, was affirmed on March 5, 2026.

Canarelli v. Canarelli - Appellate Court Affirmation

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed a prior opinion in the case of Canarelli v. Canarelli. The docket number for this appeal was 4D2024-2361. The court's disposition was 'Affirmed'.

Infinity Auto Insurance Company v. SOS Medical Center - Insurance Dispute

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court's decision in the case of Infinity Auto Insurance Company v. SOS Medical Center. The appeal concerned an insurance dispute, and the appellate court upheld the original ruling without modification.

HHS Benefit Parameters for 2027 and Basic Health Program Correction

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has issued a proposed rule detailing benefit and payment parameters for the 2027 benefit year. This notice also includes a correction to the Basic Health Program. The rule outlines key parameters affecting health insurance marketplaces and programs.

HHS Proposes Rescinding LGBTQI+ Child Placement Rule

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has proposed rescinding the Designated Placement Requirements under Titles IV-E and IV-B for LGBTQI+ children. This proposed rule seeks public comment on the removal of these requirements.

State v. Vy Thang - Court of Appeals Opinion

The Washington Court of Appeals has filed an opinion in the case of State of Washington v. Vy Thang. The opinion was authored by Judge Tracy Staab and filed on March 5, 2026. This is a standard procedural update for a court case.

Marriage of Gamble & Woolsey Opinion

The Washington Court of Appeals, Division III, filed an opinion in the case of In the Matter of the Marriage of Kera Gamble & Allan Woolsey. The opinion was filed on March 5, 2026, under docket number 40891-4.

Cundy v. BNSF Railway Company - Court of Appeals Opinion

The Washington Court of Appeals Division III has filed an opinion in the case of Judy Cundy v. BNSF Railway Company, et al. The opinion was filed on March 5, 2026, under docket number 40095-6.

Anderson v. Grant County - Supreme Court Opinion

The Supreme Court of Washington has issued its opinion in the case of Anderson v. Grant County, filed on March 5, 2026. The opinion details the court's decision on matters appealed from the Kittitas County Superior Court.

Adam Stites v. Clayton Jack Montgomery - Court of Appeals Opinion

The Washington Court of Appeals Division III has issued an opinion in the case of Adam Stites v. Clayton Jack Montgomery, et al. The opinion was filed on March 5, 2026, under docket number 41174-5. This document represents the court's final decision on the appeal from the Spokane Superior Court.

Marriage of Sams - Court of Appeals Opinion

The Washington State Court of Appeals Division III has issued an opinion in the marriage of Sams case, filed on March 5, 2026. The opinion addresses an appeal from the Benton Superior Court regarding a divorce judgment.

In re Monro - Attorney Discipline

The Supreme Court of the State of Washington filed an opinion in the case In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Monro on March 5, 2026. The case involves attorney discipline proceedings, with the court issuing a majority opinion signed by multiple justices.

Alonso v. New Orleans Aviation Board - Motion to Remand Granted

The Louisiana Court of Appeal granted a joint motion to remand in Alonso v. New Orleans Aviation Board. The court vacated the district court's judgment of involuntary dismissal and remanded the case for reconsideration, following a joint request from both parties.

Engineering Corp v. Law Corp - Breach of Contract Case Affirmed

The Louisiana Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court's judgment in the case of David C. Flettrich, a Professional Engineering Corporation v. Dudley Debosier, a Professional Law Corporation. The appeal concerned allegations of breach of contract and amounts owed on an open account.

B.B. v. Hochul - Children's Rights to Family Integrity

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed in part and affirmed in part a district court's dismissal of a case brought by children alleging New York's certification scheme for foster and adoptive parents violates their substantive due process rights. The court found the plaintiffs have standing but some claims are moot.

Mar-Can Transport Co. v. Local 854 Pension Fund - ERISA Withdrawal Liability

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision in Mar-Can Transport Co. v. Local 854 Pension Fund, ruling that Mar-Can is entitled to a $1.8 million reduction in withdrawal liability under ERISA. The court interpreted a key provision regarding the transfer of unfunded vested benefits when employees switch unions.

United States v. William Jimenez - Sentencing Appeal

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's sentencing of William Jimenez to 105 months imprisonment and three years of supervised release. Jimenez appealed specific conditions of his supervised release and his sentence term, but the court found no abuse of discretion and upheld the appeal waiver.

CFHC v. CoreLogic Rental Property Solutions - Fair Housing Act and FCRA Case

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in CFHC v. CoreLogic Rental Property Solutions, vacating in part, affirming in part, and reversing in part a lower court decision. The court found the Connecticut Fair Housing Center lacked standing and that CoreLogic did not cause housing denials based on criminal history, thus failing the disparate impact claim under the Fair Housing Act. The court also affirmed CoreLogic's violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

Care One LLC v NLRB - Court Opinion on Labor Practices

The Second Circuit affirmed a district court's denial of a preliminary injunction sought by Care One LLC and its affiliates. The healthcare companies challenged NLRB proceedings against them for alleged unfair labor practices, arguing the ALJ was unlawfully appointed. The court found the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate irreparable harm.

GEICO v. Patel - RICO Act Case

The Second Circuit affirmed a preliminary injunction against Dr. Bhargav Patel and associated entities in a RICO Act case brought by GEICO. The court found that the preliminary injunction was necessary to prevent irreparable harm to GEICO from potential inconsistent judgments and the obscuring of an alleged fraudulent scheme by numerous state collection proceedings.

US v. Cardenas - Cocaine Import Conspiracy Conviction

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the conviction of Jay James Roldan Cardenas for conspiracy to import cocaine. The court found that the district court erred in excluding evidence relevant to Cardenas's state of mind, potentially impacting his defense.

Safdieh v. Commissioner - Tax Penalties Assessment

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a Tax Court decision, holding that the Commissioner of Internal Revenue can assess penalties for failing to report foreign business control under I.R.C. § 6038(b). The court vacated the Tax Court's order granting summary judgment to the taxpayer, Joseph Safdieh, and remanded the case.

Reidy Contracting Group LLC v. Mt. Hawley Insurance Company - Insurance Coverage Dispute

The Second Circuit affirmed a district court's judgment, holding that Mt. Hawley Insurance Company must provide additional insured coverage to Reidy Contracting Group LLC. The court found Reidy to be an additional insured and that the Employers Liability Exclusion was ambiguous and thus construed against Mt. Hawley.

SBK ART LLC v. Akin Gump - Discovery for Foreign Litigation

The Second Circuit affirmed a district court's order granting SBK ART LLC's petition for discovery under 28 U.S.C. §1782 to aid foreign litigation. The court disagreed with Akin Gump's argument that discovery should be denied if not discoverable from the foreign client abroad.

United States v. Aryeetey - Felon in Possession of Firearm

The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the conviction and sentence of Ivan Joel Aryeetey for being a felon in possession of a firearm. The court found no abuse of discretion in admitting DNA evidence and deemed the sentence substantively reasonable.

McGucken v. Shutterstock, Inc. - Copyright Infringement Appeal

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals partially affirmed and partially vacated a district court's summary judgment in McGucken v. Shutterstock, Inc. The court affirmed the dismissal of the false copyright management information claim but vacated the dismissal of copyright infringement claims, remanding for further proceedings on specific factual issues.

Peña Garcia v. Department of Labor - Disability Claim

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals denied a petition for review in a disability claim case involving Luis Peña Garcia. The court affirmed the Department of Labor's decision that medical cannabis is not a covered treatment under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act due to its Schedule I classification under federal law.

Kellogg v. Nichols - Concealed Carry License Case

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals amended its opinion in Kellogg v. Nichols, affirming the dismissal of a lawsuit challenging New York's concealed carry license laws. The court held that state judges have absolute judicial immunity for decisions on license applications and that federal courts lack jurisdiction for injunctive or declaratory relief against such judges in their official capacities.

Broadcast Music, Inc. v. North American Concert Promoters Association - Antitrust

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a district court's decision regarding music licensing fees set by Broadcast Music, Inc. (BMI) for the North American Concert Promoters Association (NACPA). The court found the imposed rates and expanded definition of gross revenues to be unreasonable and remanded the case for further proceedings.

Stevenson v. Employment Security Dept. - Order of Remand

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington issued an order remanding the case of Stevenson v. Employment Security Dept. to Spokane County Superior Court. The court found that the plaintiff, Sharon L. Stevenson, improperly removed the case from state court to federal court, as the right to remove is limited to defendants.

Elizabth B. v. Frank Bisignano - Social Security Benefits Appeal

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington affirmed the Commissioner of Social Security's decision to deny disability income benefits. The court found no harmful legal error in the Administrative Law Judge's evaluation of medical opinions or the claimant's testimony. The appeal was denied, and the Commissioner's decision was granted.

Rafael Martinez v. Wal-Mart Inc - Discovery Dispute

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington issued an order addressing discovery disputes in Rafael Martinez v. Wal-Mart Inc. The court ruled on motions to compel and a motion for a protective order related to document production and deposition notices.

US Measles Cases Exceed 1,100; Washington Reports 26

The Washington State Department of Health reported 26 measles cases in early 2026, with national cases surpassing 1,100. This represents a significant increase from previous years, with nearly 80% of Washington cases occurring in unvaccinated children. The DOH emphasizes the MMR vaccine as the primary prevention method.

Colorado Agricultural Future Loan Program Modifications

Colorado Bill SB26-064 modifies the state's Agricultural Future Loan Program to expand eligibility for funding. The bill allows certain entities, including water districts and ditch companies with support from conservation divisions, to qualify for loans aimed at conserving agricultural land and facilitating ownership transfers to eligible farmers and ranchers.

Colorado Bill: Expedited Veterinary Licensing and Drug Donation

Colorado HB26-1198 proposes to expedite veterinary licensing by endorsement and veterinary technician registration by endorsement. It also establishes a program for the donation of unused veterinary drugs. The bill is currently under consideration in the 2026 Regular Session.

Colorado Bill Supports Victim-Survivors and Drug Supply

Colorado's SB26-095 proposes measures to support victim-survivors of crimes. Key provisions include informing victims about medical exam results, authorizing emergency dispensing of STI prophylaxis, and enhancing peace officer training on trauma response. The bill also addresses arbitration agreements related to sexual harassment disputes.

Colorado Firefighter Safety Act Petition Elections

Colorado Bill SB26-047 proposes changes to the definition of a general election for submitting ballot questions related to firefighter collective bargaining and the Colorado Firefighter Safety Act. The bill aims to modify when such questions can be added to the ballot.

Colorado Bill: Opt-out of Mail Ballot Packets

Colorado's SB26-106 proposes a process for registered electors to opt out of receiving mail ballot packets for elections conducted by mail ballot starting November 2, 2027. The bill requires the Secretary of State to adopt rules for this opt-out process and for electors to resume receiving ballots. County clerks will report opt-out numbers and associated cost savings.

Colorado Bill on Colorimetric Drug Tests for Possession

Colorado Bill HB26-1020 modifies procedures for colorimetric drug tests in drug possession cases. It restricts arrests for certain misdemeanor possession charges and requires advisements in felony cases regarding test accuracy and defendant rights.

Colorado Bill Requires Toxicology Results in Fatal Crash Reports

Colorado HB26-1127, introduced for the 2026 Regular Session, requires coroners to include toxicology results for all deceased parties in reports concerning fatal motor vehicle crashes. The bill is currently under consideration.

Colorado Bill Modifies County Commissioner Election Rules

Colorado Bill HB26-1203 proposes to modify county commissioner election rules for counties with populations of 70,000 or more. The bill eliminates discretionary election systems and mandates specific methods for electing 5 commissioners, requiring a resolution and voter referral by 2027.

Colorado Bill Expands Protection Order Petitioners

Colorado Bill SB26-004 proposes to expand the list of individuals and entities eligible to petition a court for an extreme risk protection order. The bill, currently under consideration, would allow healthcare facilities, behavioral health treatment facilities, schools, and higher education institutions to file such petitions.

Colorado Open Records Act Modifications

Colorado's SB26-107 modifies the state's Open Records Act by excluding disability communication records, altering response times, and adding provisions for fee determination and student data protection. The bill also requires public entities to post CORA rules and information on making requests.

Colorado Bill Requires Law Enforcement Use of ATF Firearm Tracing System

Colorado Bill HB26-1265 requires all law enforcement agencies in the state to register for and use the ATF's national electronic firearm tracing system. Agencies must transmit recovered or confiscated firearm information to the system and share all related data with the Colorado Bureau of Investigation.

Colorado Bill Increases Marriage and Family Therapist Licensure Access

Colorado Bill HB26-1228 proposes changes to the licensure requirements for marriage and family therapists. The bill aims to increase access to licensure by allowing individuals whose master's or doctoral programs did not include an internship or practicum to still become licensed, with additional supervised clinical hours required.

Colorado Bill Clarifies Firearms Dealer Permit Requirements

Colorado HB26-1126 clarifies existing firearms dealer permit requirements, expands them to 'responsible persons' and employees/contractors, and introduces new security and reporting mandates. The bill also allows for fines up to $100,000 for repeat violations.

Colorado State Forest Service Good Neighbor Authority Bill HB26-1205

Colorado Bill HB26-1205 proposes changes to state law to align with the federal expansion of good neighbor authority agreements. The bill specifies that the Colorado State Forest Service may enter into these agreements with federal agencies and requires demonstration projects to improve forest health and resilience.

Colorado Bill Repeals Biomass Grant Program

Colorado Bill HB26-1213 proposes to repeal the state's Biomass Utilization Grant Program. This action is based on a recommendation from the 2025 sunset report by the department of regulatory agencies. The bill is currently under consideration in the 2026 legislative session.

Bill to Sunset Kidney Disease Prevention Education Task Force

Colorado HB26-1277 proposes to sunset the Kidney Disease Prevention and Education Task Force, implementing a recommendation from the 2025 sunset report by the department of regulatory agencies. The bill is currently under consideration in the 2026 Regular Session.

Colorado Bill Continues Vessel Registration Program Until 2036

Colorado House Bill HB26-1197 proposes to continue the state's vessel registration program until September 1, 2036. The bill has been introduced and is currently under consideration by the House Agriculture, Water, and Natural Resources Committee.

Mobile Home Property Tax Bill Modifies Delinquent Tax Collection

Colorado HB26-1120 modifies mobile home property tax collection procedures, aligning them with real property tax lien sales and public auctions. The bill also extends redemption periods for mobile home owners and adjusts the property tax exemption threshold for mobile homes.

Salinas v. Keefe Commissary Network, LLC - Civil Rights: Jobs

A new civil case, Salinas v. Keefe Commissary Network, LLC, was filed on February 20, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case is based on diversity jurisdiction and falls under the Civil Rights: Jobs category.

California Privacy Agency Fines Ford for Opt-Out Process Friction

The California Privacy Protection Agency has fined Ford Motor Company $375,703 and ordered changes to its opt-out process for violating the CCPA. Ford required unnecessary identity verification for consumers opting out of data sales and sharing.

SEC Files Proposed Settlement with Rainberry for Wash Trading Claims

The SEC has filed a proposed settlement with Rainberry, Inc. for wash trading claims, requiring a $10 million civil penalty. This settlement, if approved by the court, would resolve the SEC's claims against Rainberry related to wash trading and dismiss all remaining claims against Rainberry and other defendants, including Justin Sun and associated foundations.

Sausalito Yacht Harbor v. S/V Dreamer - Maritime Contract Dispute

Sausalito Yacht Harbor has filed a civil complaint against the S/V Dreamer in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves claims for breach of maritime contract, trespass, and quantum meruit, seeking vessel arrest and monetary damages. The filing fee was $405.

Doe v. Lyft, Inc. - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, Doe v. Lyft, Inc., was filed on March 5, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case is based on diversity jurisdiction and falls under the category of Personal Injury: Other.

W. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al - Personal Injury Product Liability

A new civil case, W. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on March 5, 2026. The case involves personal injury and product liability claims against Uber Technologies, Inc. and related entities.

GE-GAL-0001 v. Roblox Corporation - Product Liability Complaint

A product liability complaint has been filed against Roblox Corporation in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, GE-GAL-0001 for Minor Plaintiff GE-0001 v. Roblox Corporation, was filed on March 5, 2026, under case number 3:26-cv-01927. The filing fee was $405.

R. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al - Personal Injury Product Liability

A new civil case, R. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al, was filed on March 5, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case is classified as Personal Injury Product Liability and involves federal question jurisdiction.

D.S. v. United States - Civil Rights Case

A new civil case, D.S. v. United States, was filed on March 5, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a claim related to Civil Rights with the U.S. Government as a defendant. The filing includes a complaint and a motion to proceed under a pseudonym.

Moses v. Cumulus Media Inc. - Copyright Case

A copyright infringement case, Moses v. Cumulus Media Inc., was filed on March 5, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The complaint alleges copyright infringement by Cumulus Media Inc. and includes the filing of exhibits and a civil cover sheet.

Harville v. Demi Co LLC - TCPA Case Filing

A new civil case, Harville v. Demi Co LLC, was filed on March 5, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case is based on the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) and alleges violations by Demi Co LLC.

KA.H. v. Uber Technologies Inc. et al - Personal Injury Product Liability

A new civil case, KA.H. v. Uber Technologies Inc. et al, has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves personal injury and product liability claims. The initial filings include the complaint, civil cover sheet, proposed summons, and certificate of interested entities.

Kothandan et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services

A lawsuit was filed on March 5, 2026, by Kothandan et al. against the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). The case, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, seeks declaratory and injunctive relief under the Administrative Procedure Act. The filing fee was $405.

I.A. v. United States - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, I.A. v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons) et al, was filed on March 5, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case number is 3:26-cv-01942 and involves a complaint against the U.S. Government.

Lamas v Northrop Grumman - Civil Rights Jobs Case

A civil rights jobs case titled Lamas v Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation was filed on March 5, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case was removed from Santa Clara County Superior Court by Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation.

J.B. v. US BOP - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, J.B. v. US BOP, was filed on March 5, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a complaint against the United States and the Federal Bureau of Prisons, with initial filings including a proposed summons and a motion to maintain plaintiff anonymity.

Wynes v. Danone North America - Product Liability

A new product liability case, Wynes v. Danone North America, was filed on March 5, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves personal injury and product liability claims and has been transferred for consolidated pretrial proceedings.

Admiral v. Wells Fargo Bank NA - Truth in Lending

Nicholas Admiral has filed a lawsuit against Wells Fargo Bank NA in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, case number 3:26-cv-01929. The complaint alleges violations of the Truth in Lending Act. The case was filed on March 5, 2026.

X.P. v. United States - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, X.P. v. United States (Federal Bureau of Prisons) et al, was filed on March 5, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case number is 3:26-cv-01940. The filing includes a complaint, proposed summons, a motion to maintain plaintiff anonymity, and a consent to proceed before a US Magistrate Judge.

B.R. v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons) - Civil Case Filing

A civil case, B.R. v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons), was filed on March 5, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The filing includes a complaint, proposed summons, and motions related to maintaining plaintiff anonymity and proceeding before a US Magistrate Judge.

Johnson v. Alameda County Social Services - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, Johnson v. Alameda County Social Services, was filed on March 5, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The initial filings include a complaint, an application to proceed in forma pauperis, and an initial case management scheduling order.

Nation's Foodservice v. Calise Partners - Civil Fraud Case

Nation's Foodservice, Inc. has filed a civil fraud case against Calise Partners, LLC in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, bearing number 4:26-cv-01935, was filed on March 5, 2026. The filing includes a complaint and a proposed summons.

WM-0001 v. Roblox Corporation - Personal Injury Product Liability

A new civil case, WM-0001 v. Roblox Corporation, was filed on March 5, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves claims of personal injury and product liability under diversity jurisdiction.

Mars v. Uber Technologies - Personal Injury Product Liability

A new civil case, Mars v. Uber Technologies, Inc., was filed on March 5, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves claims of personal injury and product liability. The initial filings include the complaint, a certificate of interested entities, and proposed summons.

Cubimana Building Sets Recalled Due to Battery Ingestion Risk

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) announced the recall of approximately 3,950 Cubimana Island Storm 3 In 1 Building Sets sold on Amazon. The recall is due to a violation of the mandatory toy safety standard, as the battery compartment can be easily accessed by children, posing a risk of serious injury or death from battery ingestion.

HALO Dream Magic Sleepsuits Recalled Due to Choking Hazard

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) announced a recall of approximately 45,000 HALO Dream Magic Sleepsuits due to a choking hazard. The zipper heads can detach from the garment, posing a risk to infants. Consumers are advised to stop using the product immediately.

Tomum Minoxidil Hair Serum Bottles Recalled Due to Child Poisoning Risk

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) announced a recall of approximately 27,400 units of Tomum Minoxidil Hair Regrowth Treatment spray bottles due to a violation of the Poison Prevention Packaging Act. The bottles are not child-resistant, posing a serious poisoning risk to children. Belleka Inc. is offering a free replacement product.

Unique Brands Recalls Forever 21 Pajama Pants for Burn Hazard

Unique Brands is recalling approximately 230 units of Forever 21 Kids Disney Mickey Mouse Pajama Pants due to a burn hazard. The recalled sleepwear violates mandatory flammability standards for children's sleepwear, posing a risk of serious injury or death. Consumers are advised to stop using the product immediately and contact Unique Brands for a full refund.

People v. Perez - Colorado Court of Appeals Opinion

The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed the postconviction court's order denying George Perez's motion for postconviction relief. The case involved charges including vehicular assault and felony driving under the influence.

People v. Monte - Colorado Court of Appeals Opinion

The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions of Lorenzo Owen Monte for attempted first-degree murder, first-degree assault, and second-degree kidnapping. The opinion, issued on March 5, 2026, addresses Monte's appeal of his convictions and sentences.

People v. Torreyson - Colorado Court of Appeals Opinion

The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Trevor David Torreyson for first-degree murder. The court found no reversible error in the trial proceedings, upholding the jury's verdict and the life sentence without parole.

Estate of Carrillo v. Carrillo - Probate Dispute

The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed a probate court's decision to admit a will into probate, vacate a prior personal representative appointment, and appoint a new personal representative. The appellant's claims regarding the will's validity and undue influence were rejected.

People v. Ahuero - Colorado Court of Appeals Opinion

The Colorado Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal of Stephen J. Ahuero in case number 24CA1412. The dismissal was based on an untimely notice of appeal, preventing the court from addressing the merits of Ahuero's claims regarding ineffective assistance of counsel.

Peo in Interest of EG - Parental Rights Termination

The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed a juvenile court's judgment terminating a mother's parental rights to her child. The mother appealed, arguing the court erred in finding she abandoned the child, but the appellate court found no error.

Peo v. Davis - Colorado Court of Appeals Restitution Order

The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's order requiring Andrew J. Davis to pay $3,879.27 in restitution for medical expenses and lost wages related to an assault. The court found sufficient evidence was presented to support the restitution amount.

Colorado Court of Appeals - Maxwell Estate Real Property Restrictions

The Colorado Court of Appeals ruled on a case concerning restrictions on the sale and use of real property devised in a will. The court held that while restrictions on alienation are not void, the will can be reformed to allow the property to be sold or encumbered consistent with the donor's original purpose.

Colorado Court of Appeals - Dependency and Neglect Proceeding

The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed a juvenile court's judgment allocating parental responsibilities in a dependency and neglect proceeding. The mother appealed the decision to make the father the primary residential parent during the school year, but the court found no error.

Latsis v. Arapahoe - Property Tax Valuation Appeal

The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed a Board of Assessment Appeals decision reducing George Latsis's property valuation for the 2023 tax year from $1,043,100 to $949,000. The court found the BAA's decision was supported by competent evidence.

Marriage of Kline - Colorado Court of Appeals Opinion

The Colorado Court of Appeals issued a non-precedential opinion in the Marriage of Kline case, affirming a district court's order on parental time and decision-making responsibilities. The opinion addresses issues including domestic abuse and coercive control within the context of child custody.

Stoffel v. ICAO - Unemployment Benefits Appeal

The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed an order dismissing Andrew Stoffel's administrative appeal for unemployment benefits. Stoffel failed to appear for a scheduled hearing and filed his appeal beyond the statutory deadline without showing good cause.

Colorado Court of Appeals - Dependency and Neglect Case

The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed a juvenile court's decision denying a father's motion for relief from a judgment terminating his parental rights. The father had sought to withdraw his confession to termination, alleging he did not receive promised communication and access to the child.

Wyles v. Williams Law - Colorado Court of Appeals Opinion

The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's order awarding attorney fees and costs to defendants in a professional negligence case. The court remanded the case with directions, upholding the lower court's decision regarding fees and costs.

Marriage of Kiphardt - Colorado Court of Appeals

The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's order modifying parenting time in the Marriage of Kiphardt case. The mother appealed the modification, arguing the magistrate applied the incorrect legal standard and that the record did not support findings of endangerment. The appellate court found no error.

Colorado Court of Appeals Opinion in Peo v SS

The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed a juvenile court's judgment allocating parental responsibilities for a child to the father in a dependency and neglect proceeding. The case involved allegations of abuse, parental relationship volatility, and substance use concerns.

Peo v. Seymour - Colorado Court of Appeals Opinion

The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's order imposing restitution in the case of People v. Seymour. The defendant appealed the restitution amount, arguing procedural errors in its determination. The court found no reversible error.

Peo v. Shea - Colorado Court of Appeals Opinion

The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed the postconviction court's order denying Daniel Richard Shea's motion claiming ineffective assistance of counsel related to his sentencing. The opinion addresses Shea's appeal of his conviction for first degree burglary, second degree kidnapping, and criminal extortion.

People v. Regnier - Colorado Court of Appeals Opinion

The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Timothy Joseph Lloyd Regnier for driving-related crimes and drug possession. The court found no reversible error in the trial court's denial of the motion to suppress statements made by Regnier at the time of his arrest.

DOJ Report on USA PATRIOT Act Implementation

The Department of Justice's Office of the Inspector General has released a report to Congress detailing the implementation of Section 1001 of the USA PATRIOT Act. The report, posted on March 5, 2026, fulfills a statutory requirement for oversight and transparency regarding the Act's application.

GSA Experts to Attend Defense Technology Industry Event

The U.S. General Services Administration announced that GSA experts will attend the Armed Forces Communications and Electronics Association's 50th New Horizons 2026 event from March 9-11, 2026. The event provides networking and learning opportunities for small businesses interested in federal contracting.

Trustees of Dennis Pines Condominium Trust v. Patten - Case Reinstatement and Final Judgment

The U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts granted the United States' motion to reinstate a case and enter a final judgment. The court denied a motion to stay the order dismissing the case.

Rafiq v. Bowers - Habeas Petition Granted in Part

The District Court for the District of Massachusetts granted in part Shamoon Rafiq's habeas petition challenging a BOP disciplinary hearing. The court denied the motion to dismiss and granted the petition on two of three claims, impacting the petitioner's good time credits.

Tewksbury Living Group, LLC v. KCP Advisory Group, LLC - Civil Action

The US District Court for Massachusetts issued an order in the civil action Tewksbury Living Group, LLC, et al. v. KCP Advisory Group, LLC and EF Senior Living Management, LLC. This case arises from the receivership and closure of a senior living facility.

California Fines TheBeadChest.com $17,000 for Excessive Lead

The California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) has fined online retailer TheBeadChest.com $17,000 for selling jewelry with excessive lead levels. The retailer has agreed to stop selling non-compliant jewelry.

FDA Warning Letter to Premium Health Management

The FDA issued a warning letter to Premium Health Management Inc. for misbranding compounded semaglutide and tirzepatide products. The company's website made false or misleading claims about the products, suggesting they were compounded by Premium Health when they were not, and implying FDA approval or evaluation.

Correction to Federal Reserve Rules Regarding Delegation of Authority

The Federal Reserve System has issued a correction to its rules regarding the delegation of authority. This correction amends 12 CFR Part 265 and was published in the Federal Register on March 5, 2026.

Avian Influenza Detected in Domestic Flock

The Massachusetts Department of Agricultural Resources (MDAR) announced the detection of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) in a domestic flock in Dukes County. This marks the second domestic flock in Massachusetts to test positive this year. MDAR is advising poultry owners to implement strong biosecurity measures to prevent exposure.

State AGs Sue Trump Administration Over Tariffs

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong, joined by 22 other states and two governors, has filed a lawsuit challenging the Trump administration's latest round of tariffs. The lawsuit argues these tariffs, imposed without congressional approval, are illegal and increase costs for American consumers and businesses.

US v. Jose Duran Garcia - Appeal Affirmed

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial of Jose Duran Garcia's motion to suppress evidence. The court found that the search of the bus luggage compartment, based on a drug dog's alert, was lawful. Duran Garcia had pleaded guilty after his motion to suppress was denied.

US v. Manger Blackmon - Criminal Appeal

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Manger Blackmon for being a felon in possession of a firearm. The court found that any error in not having a jury determine the 'occasions' for prior violent felonies was harmless, upholding the mandatory minimum sentence.

United States v. Sergio Carrillo Murillo - Affirmation of Conviction

The Fourth Circuit affirmed the conviction of Sergio Carrillo Murillo in a published opinion. This decision is the second appeal in his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceedings, addressing claims of ineffective assistance of counsel related to his guilty plea and potential deportation.

Fredis Ortez Reyes v. USCIS - Immigration Jurisdiction

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed and remanded a district court's decision, holding that courts do have jurisdiction to review immigration judge decisions based solely on statutory interpretation. The case involves a denial of a derivative asylee status petition based on a prior removal order.

Citizens Property Insurance Corporation Rate Filings Final Order

The Florida Office of Insurance Regulation has issued a final order regarding rate filings from Citizens Property Insurance Corporation. This order establishes the rates for personal and commercial property insurance lines, ensuring they meet statutory requirements for actuarial soundness and market function.

State v. Washington - Rape, Kidnapping Convictions Challenged

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed the rape and kidnapping convictions of Eric Washington. The court found that Washington waived his statute of limitations defense by failing to raise it before the trial court, despite the state initially filing a John Doe indictment years prior to naming him.

Sager v. Sager - Child and Spousal Support Appeal

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's judgment regarding child and spousal support calculations in the case of Sager v. Sager. The decision addresses the division of marital property and the establishment of staged support obligations tied to the sale of the marital residence.

Ohio Court of Appeals Denies Custody Hearing Continuance

The Ohio Court of Appeals denied a father's request to continue a permanent custody hearing. The court found no abuse of discretion in the trial court's decision, affirming the granting of permanent custody to Franklin County Children Services.

Mitchell Family Trust Fund v. Cole - Trademark Infringement Appeal

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's summary judgment orders in the case of Mitchell Family Trust Fund v. Cole. The appellate court found that the appellants did not properly raise discovery disputes with the trial court and that their demand for a manifest-weight-of-the-evidence review was inappropriate for summary judgment orders.

Cleveland v. Shaker Heights Apartments Owner, LLC - Housing Court Abuse of Discretion

The Ohio Court of Appeals reversed a housing court's denial of the City of Cleveland's motion to dismiss charges against Shaker Heights Apartments Owner, LLC. The appellate court found the housing court abused its discretion by not allowing the City to argue facts and by partially applying the test for good cause, remanding the case to grant the dismissal.

State v. Green - Motion to Withdraw Guilty Plea

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a conviction for second-degree robbery in State v. Green. The court ruled that a motion to withdraw a guilty plea was outside the scope of the appeal as it was filed in a related trial court case. The court also found no error in imposing the maximum sentence.

Yates v. Rigby - Appellate Review of Divorce

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's divorce judgment in Yates v. Rigby. The appellate court presumed the regularity of proceedings and affirmed due to the appellant's failure to provide a transcript and lack of cognizable legal argument.

University Heights v Weizman - Public Nuisance Case

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision finding a property a public nuisance and appointing a receiver. The court found the property unfit for habitation and a fire hazard, upholding the appointment of a receiver to manage abatement prior to a full repair estimate.

Shaker Hts. v. Patterson - Traffic Violation Appeal

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision finding Larry Reginald Patterson guilty of two traffic violations. Patterson's appeal, which raised issues of discovery violations and alleged financial instrument irregularities, was denied as he failed to file a transcript and raise issues properly on appeal.

Price v. Price - Ohio Court of Appeals Opinion

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's judgment in the case of Price v. Price. The appellate court found no merit in the appellant's arguments regarding summary judgment, land installment contract law, and jurisdiction over personal property.

Mitchell Family Trust Fund v. Cole - Summary Judgment Vacated

The Ohio Court of Appeals vacated a trial court's decision granting summary judgment on third-party claims. The appellate court remanded the case with instructions to deem the third-party claims and the summary judgment motion moot, as they were derivative of the primary claims.

State v. Gill - Weapons Charge Acquittal

The Ohio Court of Appeals reversed a trial court's denial of a motion for acquittal on weapons charges for Lee Gill. The court found insufficient evidence presented by the state for both the weapons under disability and tampering with evidence charges, entering a judgment of acquittal.

State v. Jackson - Ohio Court of Appeals Opinion

The Ohio Court of Appeals reversed a conviction for endangering children in the case of State v. Jackson. The court found that the state failed to establish that the appellant created a substantial risk to the health or safety of the child as required by statute.

State v. McInnes - Ohio Court of Appeals Opinion

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions and sentence of Ian W. McInnes. The court addressed issues including the burden of proof for affirmative defenses, admissibility of lay opinion testimony, sufficiency of evidence, confrontation rights, Garrity statements, grand-jury transcripts, and sentencing.

State v. Ferrelli - Trial Court Lacked Authority for Minor Misdemeanor Probation

The Ohio Court of Appeals ruled that a trial court lacked statutory authority to impose probation for a minor misdemeanor offense. The appellate court reversed the lower court's judgment and remanded the case for resentencing, noting that probation is not a permissible sentencing option for minor misdemeanors in Ohio.

State v. Holmes - Evidence, Fraud, Legal Arguments

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed convictions for interfering with civil rights, dereliction of duty, tampering with records, and telecommunications fraud in State v. Holmes. The court found sufficient evidence for the convictions but noted an error in the verdict form for tampering with records, deeming it plain error but not grounds for reversal.

Ohio Court of Appeals Affirms Termination of Parental Rights

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a juvenile court's decision terminating a mother's parental rights and granting permanent custody to Lucas County Children Services for six of her nine children. The court found no error in the juvenile court's judgment.

In re A.P. - Child Support Appeal Dismissed

The Ohio Court of Appeals dismissed an appeal filed by Father A.P. regarding a child support order. The court found that the father improperly attempted to "bootstrap" the denial of a second motion to vacate to appeal the denial of his first motion, which was untimely.

Cleveland v. Johnson - Traffic Violation Discovery Dispute

The Ohio Court of Appeals reversed and remanded a traffic violation conviction for Stephen-E Johnson. The court found the trial court abused its discretion by proceeding to trial without allowing discovery and by not compelling the appellee to provide discovery to the appellant.

Hartford Casualty Insurance Co. v. Instagram, LLC - Insurance Coverage Dispute

The Delaware Superior Court issued a corrected memorandum opinion in Hartford Casualty Insurance Co. v. Instagram, LLC. The court denied defendants' motion to dismiss or stay and granted plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment, impacting insurance coverage disputes.

Gomez-Gomez v. Hrycak - Default Judgment for Accident Damages

The Delaware Superior Court entered a default judgment against Elizabeth M. Hrycak in favor of Gladys M. Gomez-Gomez for damages resulting from a car accident. The judgment includes $2,000 for medical bills and $5,000 for pain and suffering, plus costs and post-judgment interest.

McGinnis v. Gold Medal Gymnastics: Motion to Dismiss Denied

The Delaware Superior Court denied a motion to dismiss filed by Gold Medal Gymnastics Academy LLC in a case involving a minor's injury. The court found that neither of the two waivers presented by the parties were sufficiently clear under Delaware law to absolve the gymnastics academy of liability for potential negligence.

State v. Earl - Postconviction Relief Motion Denied

The Delaware Superior Court denied Melvin L. Earl's motion for postconviction relief. The court considered the defendant's plea agreement, sentencing, and subsequent filings before issuing its decision.

State v. Ushery - Postconviction Relief Denied

The Delaware Superior Court denied Calvin Ushery's motion for postconviction relief without prejudice. The court found the motion lacked sufficient factual and legal basis for claims of ineffective assistance of counsel and denied the request for appointed counsel.

Harihar v. Commonwealth - Judicial Review of Lower Court Orders

The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts affirmed a lower court's denial of a petition seeking relief from multiple lower court orders and judgments. The petitioner, Mohan A. Harihar, appealed the denial of his petition under G. L. c. 211, § 3, which sought to void judgments related to a foreclosure and eviction dating back to 2010. The court found that Harihar had not demonstrated an adequate alternative remedy or exceptional circumstances for the court's extraordinary intervention.

Matter of Cantor - Attorney Disciplinary Proceedings

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York issued an opinion in the Matter of Matthew Cantor, a suspended attorney. The court denied Cantor's motion for reinstatement and is proceeding with disciplinary charges for the unauthorized practice of law while suspended.

Schiff v. Intersystem S&S Corp. - Court Opinion

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York issued an opinion in Schiff v. Intersystem S&S Corp. The court modified a lower court's order, granting summary judgment on liability against Intersystem S&S Corp. and on a breach of contract claim for failure to procure insurance.

People v. Newton - Criminal Appeal Decision

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York affirmed a judgment against Jamar Newton. The court found the sentence imposed was not excessive. This decision was issued on March 5, 2026.

Matter of Henderson - Attorney Disciplinary Proceeding

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York issued a court opinion in the Matter of Craig Lee Henderson on March 5, 2026. The Attorney Grievance Committee seeks an order disbarring respondent, Craig Lee Henderson, due to prior disciplinary actions in California.

De Castro v. West Farms Apts. LLC - Court Opinion

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York affirmed lower court orders severing third-party actions in the case of De Castro v. West Farms Apts. LLC. The court considered the merits of a motion for leave to reargue, effectively granting it.

Matter of Bland - Attorney Disciplinary Proceedings

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York issued a court opinion in the Matter of Lamon Darrell Bland. The case concerns disciplinary proceedings against a suspended attorney. The opinion was decided and entered on March 5, 2026.

Brooks v. Ghazi et al - Stockholders Suit

A new civil case, Brooks v. Ghazi et al, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on March 5, 2026. The case, identified by docket number 3:26-cv-01944, is categorized as a Stockholders Suit under Federal Question jurisdiction. The initial filings include a complaint and proposed summons.

World HPV Day: Infection Statistics, Cancer Prevention, and Vaccination

This notice from the Virginia Department of Health discusses World HPV Awareness Day, providing statistics on HPV infection, its link to cancer, and prevention methods. It highlights the effectiveness of the HPV vaccine and screening for cervical cancer, along with other prevention steps.

Potomac River Recreational Water Advisory Partially Lifted

The Virginia Department of Health (VDH) has partially lifted a recreational water advisory for the Potomac River, effective March 5, 2026. The advisory remains in place north of Chain Bridge due to elevated E. coli levels following a sewage spill.

W.C. v. T.C. - Hawaii Family Court Custody Modification Appeal

The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals affirmed a family court's decision denying a mother's motion to modify a custody order for unsupervised visitation. The court found the mother failed to prove a change in circumstances warranting modification.

A.B. v. J.M. - Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Jurisdiction

The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals issued an amended order dismissing the appeal of J.M. in the case A.B. v. J.M. The dismissal is due to a lack of jurisdiction, as the Family Court had not entered a final order for dissolution of marriage, and the appealed order was not independently appealable. The court will take no further action on related orders.

In re Tanaka Trust - Trust Dispute Appeal

The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals filed an opinion on March 5, 2026, regarding an appeal in the matter of the Raymond K. Tanaka Trust. The case involves a dispute over residential property ownership and Lance K. Tanaka's beneficial interests in the trust.

TBC Koloa Town, LLC v. Pizzetta, Inc. - Contempt Order Appeal

The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals is reviewing a contempt order against Catherine M. Shyne. The court noted significant non-compliance with appellate rules in Shyne's opening brief, potentially impacting the appeal's progression. The case involves a contempt order related to a civil case.

NIA Webinar on Expanding Research in AD/ADRD R25 Programs

The National Institute on Aging (NIA) announced a pre-application technical assistance webinar for individuals interested in applying for the NIA Expanding Research in AD/ADRD (ERA) R25 Postbaccalaureate and Summer Research Education Programs. The webinar will be held virtually on April 8, 2026, and aims to provide guidance on the application process.

NIH ICorps Entrepreneurship Training for SBIR/STTR Awardees

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has announced the ICorps at NIH program, offering entrepreneurship training for Phase I SBIR/STTR awardees. The program aims to help small businesses develop and validate business models for commercialization. Applications are due by March 27, 2026, and April 17, 2026.

United States v. Socrates Martinez-Hipolito - Sixth Circuit Non-Precedential Opinion

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision regarding a search warrant in the case of United States v. Socrates Martinez-Hipolito. The court found no error in the district court's decision not to suppress evidence related to the production of child pornography.

United States v. Emory Day - Criminal Appeal

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a non-precedential opinion in the case of United States v. Emory Day, docket number 25-1050. The court affirmed the district court's decision regarding a search warrant application based on evidence of child pornography distribution.

Ortiz-Leon v. Bondi - Immigration Appeal

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals denied a petition for review in the case of Diego Ortiz-Leon v. Pamela Bondi. The court affirmed the Board of Immigration Appeals' decision denying asylum and withholding of removal, finding no nexus between the petitioners' protected characteristics and claimed persecution.

United States v. LaVaughn Odom - Sentencing Appeal

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the 192-month sentence for LaVaughn Odom, who was convicted of drug trafficking and firearm offenses. The court found the sentence, which was below the Sentencing Guidelines range, to be procedurally and substantively reasonable. The appeal concerned the reasonableness of the sentence imposed by the district court.

United States v. Derek Hahn - Sixth Circuit Non-Precedential Opinion

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's sentence of Derek Hahn, who was convicted of using a minor to produce sexually explicit videos. The court found Hahn's sentence of 330 months to be reasonable despite his arguments for a downward variance.

United States v. Dustin Newsome - Sentencing Appeal

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the sentence of Dustin Newsome, who was convicted of child pornography offenses. Newsome was sentenced to 420 months imprisonment for inducing minors to send sexually explicit content and possessing child pornography.

Williams v. Gage - Legal Malpractice Appeal

The Wyoming Supreme Court affirmed a district court's decision granting summary judgment to a defendant attorney in a legal malpractice case. The plaintiff failed to designate a required expert witness within the court's established deadlines, leading to the dismissal of her claim.

Delaware Court of Chancery: Order Compelling Production of Trial Witness

The Delaware Court of Chancery ordered Summit Healthcare Operating Partnership, L.P. to produce a trial witness after the plaintiff initially declined. The court granted the defendant's motion to compel, allowing the witness to either appear in person or testify remotely within a two-week period.

AIG Specialty Insurance Co. v. Genworth Financial Inc. - Insurance Judgment Affirmance

The Delaware Supreme Court affirmed a Superior Court judgment in the case of AIG Specialty Insurance Company et al. v. Genworth Financial Inc. et al. The decision upholds the lower court's rulings on summary judgment motions, concluding the appellate review of the insurance dispute.

Amended order dismisses appeal for lack of jurisdiction

The Intermediate Court of Appeals of the State of Hawaii issued an amended order dismissing an appeal filed by J.M. The dismissal is due to a lack of jurisdiction, as the Family Court had not yet entered a dissolution of marriage order, rendering the appealed order not independently appealable. The court will take no further action on related orders and motions.

Tanaka Trust Dispute - Summary Disposition Order

The Intermediate Court of Appeals of the State of Hawaii issued a summary disposition order in the trust dispute concerning the Raymond K. Tanaka Trust. This order addresses the appeal from the Circuit Court's final judgment regarding property ownership and Lance Tanaka's beneficial rights in the trust.

TBC Koloa Town, LLC v. Pizzetta, Inc. - Contempt Order Appeal

The Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii issued a summary disposition order on an appeal concerning a contempt order. The appeal was filed by Defendant-Appellant Catherine M. Shyne against Plaintiff-Appellee TBC Koloa Town LLC. The court reviewed Shyne's points of error regarding the contempt order and a prior order for judgment debtor examination.

Court affirms denial of mother's motion for unsupervised visitation

The Intermediate Court of Appeals of the State of Hawaiʻi affirmed a family court's denial of a mother's motion to modify a custody order for unsupervised visitation. The court found the mother failed to prove a change in circumstances sufficient to warrant further modification.

Supreme Court Rejects Application for Writ of Certiorari

The Supreme Court of the State of Hawaiʻi has rejected an application for a writ of certiorari filed by William F. McKenzie and others. This decision means the lower court's ruling will stand, and the case will not be heard by the Supreme Court.

Kim v. Parcel K-Tudor Hall Farm - Interpleader Finality of Judgment

The Court of Special Appeals of Maryland dismissed an appeal in Kim v. Parcel K-Tudor Hall Farm, ruling that an interpleader judgment is not final until all claimant claims are resolved. The court found the appeal premature as the circuit court had not yet completed the second step of the interpleader process.

Chicago Headline Club v. Kristi Noem - Civil Rights

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a district court's preliminary injunction that regulated federal immigration enforcement in Chicago. The court dismissed the appeal after the plaintiffs voluntarily sought to dismiss their case, citing the end of 'Operation Midway Blitz'. This action removes the prior injunction against federal immigration authorities.

Chicago Headline Club v. Kristi Noem - Court Opinion

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a preliminary injunction against federal immigration enforcement activities in Chicago. The court dismissed the appeal as moot after the plaintiffs voluntarily sought dismissal of their case due to the cessation of the enforcement operation.

United States v. Atoris Slater - Criminal Appeal

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion in United States v. Atoris Slater (Docket No. 22-2838). The case involves a defendant appealing his sentence, which was impacted by the conversion ratios used for marijuana edibles under the Sentencing Guidelines. The court's decision may affect how drug quantities are calculated in similar cases.

Campbell v. Bisignano - Social Security Civil Case

A new civil case, Campbell v. Bisignano, was filed on March 5, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves Social Security benefits and is classified under Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV. The filing includes a complaint and a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

Cohen v Hakim: Admar International ownership dispute memorandum opinion

The US District Court for the District of Delaware issued a memorandum opinion in Cohen v. Hakim, concerning an ownership dispute over Admar International, Inc. The court denied a motion to remand the case to state court, allowing the federal litigation to proceed.

West River Fish Consumption Advisory

The Connecticut Department of Public Health has issued an advisory regarding fish consumption from the West River due to a fuel oil spill. Residents are urged to avoid eating fish caught in the affected area until further notice.

Vegas Aqua LLC v. Jupitor Corp. - Nevada Supreme Court Civil Case

The Nevada Supreme Court vacated and remanded a district court judgment in the case of Vegas Aqua, LLC v. Jupitor Corp. The court held that a short trial judge exceeded their authority by adjudicating objections to proposed judgments and subsequent post-judgment motions.

Matadamas-Serrano v. State - Criminal Conviction Appeal

The Nevada Supreme Court affirmed the conviction of Ruben Matadamas-Serrano for first-degree murder and burglary. The court found no reversible error in the trial proceedings, including claims of Batson error, Confrontation Clause violations, and evidentiary errors.

Gill v. Gill - Child Custody Case

The Nevada Supreme Court reversed and remanded a lower court's decision that denied a father's motion for child custody and support due to a lack of jurisdiction. The court clarified the application of the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) in cases involving foreign proceedings.

Care and Protection of Latifa - Massachusetts Appeals Court Opinion

The Massachusetts Appeals Court issued a non-precedential opinion regarding the care and protection of two children, Latifa and Annette. The court affirmed a lower court's decision to terminate the mother's parental rights, finding her unfit to parent.

Commonwealth v. Levi L. - Juvenile Non-Precedential Opinion

The Massachusetts Appeals Court issued a non-precedential opinion affirming the denial of a juvenile's motion to suppress evidence related to firearm and ammunition charges. The juvenile had conditionally pleaded guilty after the motion to suppress was denied.

Hull v. Ferrera - Real Property Ownership Dispute

The Massachusetts Appeals Court issued an opinion in Hull v. Ferrera, concerning the ownership of a portion of Beach Avenue. The court reviewed a Land Court decision regarding real property ownership and deed construction, impacting the town's claim versus private landowners.

B-Dunz, Inc. v. Bilingual Montessori School - Business Dispute

The Massachusetts Appeals Court affirmed a lower court's judgment in the business dispute between B-Dunz, Inc. and Bilingual Montessori School of Sharon. The court upheld rulings on directed verdicts, JNOV, and a new trial, affirming the plaintiff's acceptance of a remittitur on damages.

ESMA Final Draft RTS on Clearing Thresholds Under EMIR 3

The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has published its final report with draft regulatory technical standards (RTS) amending the clearing threshold regime under EMIR 3. The changes shift the focus from ETD vs OTC to uncleared OTC transactions, with revised thresholds for various derivative classes.

Horizon Sustainability Law News Bulletin - February 2026

DLA Piper's February 2026 sustainability law bulletin covers legislative and policy developments. Key updates include California's CARB hearing on SB 253 and SB 261 regulations, discussing proposed fees, penalties, and potential exemptions for insurers.

Supreme Court Invalidates Tariffs Imposed Under IEEPA

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize the President to impose tariffs, invalidating recent "reciprocal" tariffs and fentanyl-related country measures. The decision will reshape the tariff landscape, with the Court of International Trade and U.S. Customs and Border Protection expected to establish refund procedures for duties paid.

Importers Can Preserve Rights for IEEPA Tariff Refunds

Following a Supreme Court ruling that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize presidential tariffs, importers can take steps to preserve their rights for refunds of paid duties. The US Court of International Trade is expected to address remedies soon, and importers have options including post summary corrections, protests, or lawsuits.

Ninth Circuit Expands Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Tech Platforms

The Ninth Circuit expanded personal jurisdiction over foreign tech companies in data breach cases in Freeman v. 3Commas Technologies OÜ. The ruling allows foreign companies with significant digital activities and knowledge of California customers to be sued in California courts, reversing a lower court's dismissal.

COINS Act Codifies Outbound Investment Security Program

The 2025 COINS Act, signed into law on December 18, 2025, codifies the Outbound Investment Security Program (OISP). While it does not immediately alter existing regulations, it mandates substantive changes to the OISP's scope, with new Treasury Department regulations due by March 2027.

CIT Orders Refunds of IEEPA Tariffs on Unliquidated Entries

The Court of International Trade (CIT) has ordered U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to refund tariffs collected under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) on unliquidated and not finally liquidated entries. This ruling benefits all importers who paid these tariffs.

Texas Court Requires US Domicile for Chapter 15 Recognition

The US Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas ruled in In re Siu-Fung Ceramics Holdings that foreign debtors must have a US domicile, place of business, or property to qualify for Chapter 15 recognition. This decision aligns with the Second Circuit and diverges from the Eleventh Circuit's precedent.

EU-UK Competition Cooperation Agreement Signed

The European Commission and the UK have signed a competition cooperation agreement establishing a formal post-Brexit framework for antitrust and merger enforcement coordination. The agreement institutionalizes notification, coordination, and information-sharing mechanisms but requires ratification by both parties and is not yet in force.

OFAC Fines IMG Academy for Sanctions Violations

The Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has fined IMG Academy $XXX,XXX for accepting tuition payments from parents designated under sanctions. The enforcement action highlights the pervasive nature of sanctions risk across various sectors, including educational institutions.

USITC Launches Investigations into China Trade Relations and Biotech Support

The US International Trade Commission (ITC) has launched two Section 332 investigations: one examining the economic effects of revoking China's permanent normal trade relations status, and another reviewing China's state support and pricing practices in the biotechnology sector. These investigations will provide an analytical record for Congress and the administration regarding future trade and industrial policy measures targeting China.

USITC Investigates Chinese Biotech State Support and Pricing

The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has launched an investigation into Chinese state support and pricing practices within the biotechnology sector. The investigation aims to assess the impact on U.S. industry competitiveness and market share, with a report due by January 2027.

Germany NIS2 Cybersecurity Law Implementation Deadline

Germany's implementation law for the NIS2 Directive, effective December 2025, expands cybersecurity requirements to new sectors including digital services and manufacturing. Covered entities must register with the BSI by March 6, 2026, and comply with new security and incident reporting obligations.

OCC GENIUS Act Proposal on Stablecoins

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) has issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPR) to implement the GENIUS Act concerning stablecoins. The proposal seeks public comment on regulatory frameworks for permitted payment stablecoin issuers, including rules on yield-bearing features and opt-out provisions for state-approved issuers. Comments are due May 1, 2026.

Court Orders Customs to Refund IEEPA Duties to Importers

The Court of International Trade has ordered U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to refund International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) duties to all importers. CBP must liquidate unliquidated entries and reliquidate final entries without these duties.

OFAC Fines Executive $3.77M for Syria Sanctions Violations

The Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has settled with a real estate executive for $3.77 million for violating U.S. sanctions against Syria. The executive provided managerial services to Syrian real estate companies, which OFAC deemed an 'egregious' violation.

Supreme Court Rules IEEPA Lacks Authority for Reciprocal Tariffs

The Supreme Court ruled in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not grant the President authority to impose reciprocal tariffs. This decision impacts an estimated $175 billion in collected tariff revenues, raising questions about potential refunds.

Mideast War Disrupts LNG Contracts and Raises Supply Security Questions

The escalating conflict in the Middle East has disrupted LNG contracts, particularly due to the de facto closure of the Strait of Hormuz and attacks on Qatari facilities. This has led to record-high spot prices and is raising urgent questions about supply security and contractual performance for energy companies.

UK ICO Guidance on Agentic AI and UK GDPR Compliance

The UK ICO has released a Tech Futures report analyzing agentic AI systems and their compliance with UK GDPR. The report emphasizes that developers and deployers of these systems must adhere to existing UK GDPR requirements, including those related to automated decision-making, data minimization, and accuracy.

CRD VI Consequences for M&A Transactions

CRD VI introduces a new harmonized regime for M&A transactions in the banking sector across the EU, requiring prior notification and, in some cases, approval from competent authorities. While national transposition is incomplete, the M&A provisions are set to apply from January 11, 2026.

Colorado Bankruptcy Court Overrules Debtor's Objection to Claim

The Colorado Bankruptcy Court, in the case of In re Logan Beck (Case No. 25-11438 MER), has overruled the debtor's objection to a claim filed by the State of Colorado for $3,307,557.00. The court found the debtor lacked standing to object to the claim.

In re: Shilo Dion Sanders, Big 21, LLC, and Headache Gang, LLC - Bankruptcy Court Order

The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado issued an order denying a motion to dismiss filed by Shilo Dion Sanders, Big 21, LLC, and Headache Gang, LLC. The motion sought to dismiss seven of eight claims brought by the Chapter 7 Trustee.

In re Gabriela Gonzalez-Arceo - Bankruptcy Court Opinion

The US Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado denied an application to employ the Johnson Law Firm as attorneys for the Trustee in the bankruptcy case of Gabriela Gonzalez-Arceo. The court cited the need for further review of the contingent fee agreement and related statutory provisions.

Chairez v. Mayorkas - Immigration Waiver of Inadmissibility

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of a challenge to USCIS's denial of a waiver of inadmissibility for a U visa. The court held that such discretionary agency decisions are precluded from judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act.

Pacito v. Trump - Immigration Refugee Admissions Program

The Ninth Circuit affirmed in part and reversed in part a district court's preliminary injunctions against Executive Order No. 14163, which suspended the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP). The court found plaintiffs failed to show a likelihood of success on their claims that the executive order exceeded the President's statutory authority or violated the APA.

Pacito v. Trump - Ninth Circuit Court Opinion on Refugee Admissions

The Ninth Circuit affirmed in part and reversed in part a district court's preliminary injunction against Executive Order No. 14163, which suspended the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program. The court found plaintiffs failed to show a likelihood of success on their claims that the executive order exceeded the President's statutory authority.

Fifth Circuit Affirms Conviction for Firearm Possession After Felony

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a conviction for firearm possession by a convicted felon under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The court found the statute constitutional and rejected the defendant's vagueness challenge, citing precedent.

State AGs Sue Trump Administration Over Tariffs

Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell, joined by 23 other states, has filed a lawsuit challenging the Trump Administration's latest round of tariffs. The coalition argues these tariffs were imposed without congressional approval and unlawfully increase costs for American consumers and businesses.

A.D. v. US Bureau of Prisons - Civil Case Filing

A civil case, A.D. v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons), was filed on March 5, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The filing includes a complaint, proposed summons, a motion to maintain plaintiff anonymity, and a consent to proceed before a US Magistrate Judge.

TCPA Case Motion to Dismiss Denied

The Northern District of Georgia denied a motion to dismiss a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) case against RES 360 LLC and Peach City Properties LLC. The court found that the plaintiff's allegations regarding unsolicited text messages were sufficient to proceed. This ruling allows the class action lawsuit to move forward.