United States — March 7, 2026

Ibragimov v. Edlow et al - Immigration Case Filing

A new civil case, Ibragimov v. Edlow et al, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on March 7, 2026. The case involves 'Other Immigration Actions' and names the U.S. Government as a defendant. The initial filing is a complaint.

California AG Exposes $1.8M Luxury Vehicle Tax Evasion Scheme

California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced charges against 14 individuals for allegedly evading over $1.8 million in taxes on luxury vehicle purchases. The scheme involved falsely reporting vehicles as being used out-of-state, while they remained in California. The investigation uncovered over $20 million in evaded taxes.

US v. Jimenez - 105 Months Imprisonment for Felony Conviction

The Second Circuit affirmed a district court's judgment sentencing William Jimenez to 105 months imprisonment and three years of supervised release for possessing ammunition after a felony conviction. Jimenez appealed the special conditions of his supervised release and his sentence, but the court found no abuse of discretion and that his appeal waiver barred his sentencing challenge.

Safdieh v. Comm'r - Tax Penalties Assessment

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Commissioner of Internal Revenue may assess penalties for failing to report foreign business control under I.R.C. § 6038(b) through administrative assessment, vacating a Tax Court order. This decision impacts how the IRS collects these specific penalties.

Peña Garcia v. Department of Labor - Disability Benefits

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals denied a petition for review in Peña Garcia v. Department of Labor, upholding the denial of reimbursement for medical cannabis edibles. The court affirmed that due to marijuana's Schedule I classification under federal law, it has no accepted medical use, precluding coverage under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act.

Kellogg v. Nichols - Amended Opinion on Concealed Carry Licenses

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals issued an amended opinion in Kellogg v. Nichols, affirming the dismissal of claims challenging New York's concealed carry license laws. The court held that state judges have absolute judicial immunity when ruling on license applications and that federal courts lack jurisdiction for injunctive or declaratory relief against state officials in this context.

Care One LLC v NLRB - Court Opinion

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's denial of a preliminary injunction for Care One LLC and its affiliates. The court found that while the merits of the ultra vires claims regarding NLRB appointments and ALJ removal protections were not decided, the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate irreparable harm necessary for injunctive relief.

McGucken v. Shutterstock, Inc. - Copyright Infringement Appeal

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals partially affirmed and partially vacated a district court's ruling in McGucken v. Shutterstock, Inc. The court affirmed the dismissal of copyright management information claims but vacated the dismissal of copyright infringement claims, remanding for further proceedings.

Reidy Contracting Group, LLC v. Mt. Hawley Insurance Company - Insurance Coverage Dispute

The Second Circuit affirmed a district court ruling that Reidy Contracting Group, LLC is an additional insured under Mt. Hawley Insurance Company's excess liability policy. The court held that the Employers Liability Exclusion did not bar coverage because it was ambiguous and must be construed against Mt. Hawley.

Mar-Can Transport. Co. v. Local 854 Pension Fund - ERISA Withdrawal Liability

The Second Circuit affirmed a District Court ruling that reduced Mar-Can Transportation Company's ERISA withdrawal liability by $1.8 million. The court interpreted a key ERISA provision regarding the transfer of assets and liabilities when employees switch unions, impacting how withdrawal obligations are calculated for multiemployer pension plans.

Broadcast Music, Inc. v. North American Concert Promoters Association - Antitrust

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a district court's decision regarding music licensing fees set by Broadcast Music, Inc. (BMI) for the North American Concert Promoters Association (NACPA). The court found the imposed rates and expanded definition of gross revenues to be unreasonable, remanding the case for further proceedings.

US v. Cardenas - Cocaine Import Conspiracy Conviction

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the conviction of Jey James Roldan Cardenas for conspiracy to import cocaine. The court found that the district court erred in excluding evidence relevant to Cardenas's defense of lacking criminal intent, remanding the case for further proceedings.

SBK ART LLC v. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP - Discovery for Foreign Litigation

The Second Circuit affirmed a district court's order granting SBK ART LLC's petition for discovery under 28 U.S.C. §1782 for use in foreign litigation. The court disagreed with Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP's argument that discovery should be denied if not discoverable from the foreign client abroad.

Connecticut Fair Housing Center v. CoreLogic Rental Property Solutions

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated in part, affirmed in part, and reversed in part a district court decision concerning CoreLogic Rental Property Solutions. The court found the Connecticut Fair Housing Center lacked standing and that CoreLogic did not cause housing denials based on criminal history, thus failing the disparate impact test under the Fair Housing Act. The court also affirmed CoreLogic's violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

US v. Aryeetey - Felon in Possession of Firearm Conviction Affirmed

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction and sentence of Ivan Joel Aryeetey for being a felon in possession of a firearm. The court found no abuse of discretion in admitting DNA evidence and deemed the sentence substantively reasonable.

B.B. v. Hochul - Child Welfare Certification Rights

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed in part and affirmed in part a lower court's decision in B.B. v. Hochul. The court found that plaintiffs, children denied relative foster care placements due to criminal history or child abuse reports, have standing to sue. The ruling partially remands the case for further proceedings regarding their due process claims.

NY AG, NYPD, ATF Arrest Gun Trafficker, Seize 32 Firearms

New York Attorney General Letitia James, the NYPD, and ATF announced the arrest of Khyle Williams for illegally selling firearms. The investigation seized 32 firearms and led to 176 charges against Williams, who faces up to 25 years in prison if convicted.

International Trade Commission: Off-Road Vehicles Investigation

The International Trade Commission has initiated an investigation into certain off-road vehicles and components thereof. This notice marks the formal institution of Investigation No. 337-TA-1490, signaling the commencement of a formal inquiry into potential trade violations.

Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews

The International Trade Administration, part of the Department of Commerce, has published a notice initiating antidumping and countervailing duty administrative reviews. This notice details the commencement of these reviews, which are standard procedures within the trade enforcement framework.

Dairy Tariff-Rate Quota Import Licensing Program Proposed Rule

The Foreign Agricultural Service has proposed a new rule concerning the Dairy Tariff-Rate Quota Import Licensing Program. This proposal is open for public comment until April 8, 2026.

Daniel Robert Ybarra v. Jasmin Gabion Ybarra - Divorce Case Dismissed

The Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District, has dismissed the divorce case Daniel Robert Ybarra v. Jasmin Gabion Ybarra. The dismissal was granted upon the appellant's motion, as they no longer wished to pursue the appeal. Costs were taxed against the appellant.

Joseph Milton Mitchum v. State of Texas - Dismissed Appeal

The Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District, dismissed the appeal of Joseph Milton Mitchum in case number 13-25-00589-CR. The dismissal was due to a want of jurisdiction, as the trial court's certification indicated the appellant had no right of appeal following a plea bargain.

Kevin C. Loudon v. Victoria County - Tax Case Affirmed

The Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District, affirmed a lower court's decision in Kevin C. Loudon v. Victoria County. The court upheld the County's award of delinquent taxes, penalties, interest, and attorney's fees, dismissing Loudon's arguments against the collection of these sums.

Ramirez v. DEA Specialties II, L.L.C. - Dismissed Appeal

The Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District, dismissed the appeal in Francisco Ramirez v. DEA Specialties II, L.L.C. The dismissal occurred on March 5, 2026, due to the appellant's failure to pay the required filing fee for the notice of appeal.

Jenkins v. De La Cruz - Contract Case Opinion Vacated and Dismissed

The Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District, vacated and dismissed the appeal in Jenkins v. De La Cruz. The court found inconsistencies in the appellee's standing as a non-party, leading to the dismissal of the appeal concerning a motion for sanctions.

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters

The Federal Aviation Administration has issued a proposed rule concerning airworthiness directives for Airbus Helicopters, specifically addressing Foreign Object Debris (FOD) in the Landing Gear Actuation Control Unit (LACU). The comment period for this proposed rule closes on April 23, 2026.

Huggins v. Buchannan - Order Accepting Magistrate Judge's Recommendation

The District Court of Colorado accepted a Magistrate Judge's recommendation in Huggins v. Buchannan, denying the defendant's motion to dismiss. The court reviewed the recommendation without objection and found no clear error.

BMZ USA Inc. v. XL Hybrids Inc. - Motion to Dismiss

The District Court for the District of Colorado is considering a motion to dismiss filed by defendants XL Hybrids Inc. and Spruce Power Holding Corp. in the case BMZ USA Inc. v. XL Hybrids Inc. The court will rule on whether to dismiss the claims brought by plaintiff BMZ USA Inc. based on Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).

National Casualty Co. v. Ace American Insurance Co. - Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim

The US District Court for the District of Colorado denied National Casualty Company's motion to dismiss a counterclaim filed by Swiss Re Corporate Solutions Capacity Insurance Corporation. The case involves an underlying class action lawsuit concerning an apartment complex in Denver.

State AGs Secure Court Order to Restore FEMA Disaster Funding

A coalition of State Attorneys General, led by Washington, secured a court order compelling FEMA to restore billions in funding for the Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) program. The order requires FEMA to reverse the program's termination and issue a new funding opportunity within 21 days.

Poacher Sentenced to 43.5 Months for Felonies

The Washington Attorney General's office secured a guilty plea and a 43.5-month prison sentence for Ronald Livermore, a prolific poacher convicted of seven felonies including illegal firearm possession and hunting. This sentence is reportedly the longest agreed recommendation for illegal hunting in nearly a decade.

Executive Order Combats Cybercrime and Fraud

President Trump signed an Executive Order to combat cybercrime and fraud targeting American citizens and businesses. The order directs a review of tools to fight transnational criminal organizations, prioritizes cybercrime prosecutions, and engages foreign governments on enforcement actions.

Computational Materials for Aviation Additive Manufacturing Qualification

NIST has published guidance on computational materials approaches for the qualification and certification of metal additive manufacturing in the aviation sector. This document, authored by researchers from NASA and other institutions, provides insights into process-intensive materials.

NIST Report on Challenges in Monitoring Deployed AI Systems

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has published a report detailing challenges in monitoring deployed artificial intelligence (AI) systems. The report, based on practitioner workshops and literature review, identifies gaps and opportunities for innovation in post-deployment AI monitoring methodologies.

NY DEC Awards Over $677,000 in Smart Growth Grants

The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) has awarded over $677,000 in Smart Growth grants to seven projects in the Catskill region. These grants will support affordable housing, recreational access, and economic growth initiatives compatible with environmental protection.

Massey v. Borough of Bergenfield - Employment Discrimination Appeal

The Third Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a lower court's decision in Massey v. Borough of Bergenfield, finding that the plaintiff may have been subject to unlawful discrimination. The court struck down New Jersey's 'Background Circumstances Rule' as incompatible with state and federal anti-discrimination laws, potentially impacting future employment discrimination cases in the state.

US v. Jerome Brown - Criminal Appeal

The Third Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision in the case of US v. Jerome Brown. The court found that while the district judge improperly participated in plea negotiations, the defendant did not suffer prejudice sufficient to vacate his plea. The appeal concerned drug trafficking and firearm possession charges.

USA v. Jerome Brown - Rehearing Granted

The Third Circuit Court of Appeals has granted a petition for panel rehearing in the case of USA v. Jerome Brown. The court vacated its prior opinion and judgment from December 11, 2025, and will issue an amended opinion and re-enter judgment. Rehearing en banc was denied.

Always Movin' Moving Company LLC Permit Cancellation

The Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission (UTC) has cancelled the permit for Always Movin' Moving Company LLC due to a failure to provide proof of insurance. The company, also operating as Lake Washington Movers, had its permit closed on March 6, 2026.

Same Day Moving LLC Household Goods Permit Application

The Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission (UTC) has received a permit application from Same Day Moving LLC for household goods transportation services. The application is currently pending review.

Fitzgerald Transport Inc. Household Goods Application

The Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission (UTC) has received a new household goods carrier permit application from Fitzgerald Transport Inc., doing business as Coast Movers. The application was filed on October 1, 2025, and is currently in a pending status.

State AGs Sue Trump Administration Over Tariffs

A coalition of State Attorneys General, led by Colorado AG Phil Weiser, has filed a lawsuit challenging new tariffs imposed by the Trump administration. The suit argues these tariffs, enacted under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, are illegal and will harm American consumers and businesses.

State AG Settlement with Debt Collector for Deceptive Practices

Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser announced a settlement with Credence Resource Management, LLC (CRM) for deceptive debt collection practices. CRM will pay $43,500 and cease unlawful practices, including misrepresenting communication origins and excessive call frequency.

NIH Encourages Pre-Application Consultations for Tobacco Regulatory Science Grant

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) issued a notice encouraging applicants for the Tobacco Regulatory Science Small Grant Program (RFA-OD-25-008) to request pre-application consultations. This aims to ensure proposed research aligns with FDA Center for Tobacco Products' regulatory authorities and priorities. Applicants are asked to submit draft Specific Aims by May 14, 2026.

NIH Updates Data Management and Sharing Plan Elements

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has updated the required elements for Data Management and Sharing Plans (DMS Plans) for research applications. Effective for due dates on or after May 25, 2026, a new, simpler format page will be required. This update aims to streamline the process and reduce applicant burden by clarifying common areas of confusion and removing extraneous details.

In Re Grace Minors - Parental Rights Termination Appeal

The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's termination of a mother's parental rights to her minor children. The court found the mother lacked parenting skills, failed to engage with services, and termination was in the children's best interest. The appellate court noted disappointment with the late filing of a brief by the Department of Health and Human Services.

Clark-Rose v. Mgm Grand Detroit LLC - Lower Court Judgment Affirmed

The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's judgment in favor of MGM Grand Detroit LLC in a case brought by former employee Taniesha Clark-Rose. The court found that MGM supported its motion for summary disposition with admissible evidence, rejecting the plaintiff's appeal.

People of Michigan v. Thomas Stephen Johnston - Affirmation of Lower Court Judgment

The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's denial of a motion to suppress evidence in the case of People of Michigan v. Thomas Stephen Johnston. The court found that the search warrant, though specifying alcohol testing, was sufficiently broad to include testing for THC.

Rp v. Tv - Lower Court Judgment Affirmed

The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision to deny a motion to terminate a personal protection order (PPO). The case involved allegations of assault and disputes over financial matters concerning a family member.

In Re K M Gill Minor - Parental Rights Termination

The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's order terminating parental rights for K M Gill Minor. The respondent's parental rights were terminated under MCL 712A.19b(3)(h) due to his lengthy prison sentence for murder and felony firearm charges, which will deprive the child of a normal home for over two years.

People of Michigan v. Rickey Dale Richett - Criminal Appeal

The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's judgment against Rickey Dale Richett. Richett was convicted of second-degree murder and assault with intent to do great bodily harm less than murder. The court found no errors in the trial proceedings.

Jasmin Adilovic v. Monroe LLC - Opinion Vacated and Remanded

The Michigan Court of Appeals vacated its prior judgment and remanded the case of Jasmin Adilovic v. Monroe LLC for reconsideration. The court's prior decision had affirmed a lower court's order granting summary disposition to the employer, Monroe LLC, based on a limited statute of limitations. The Supreme Court's remand directs the Court of Appeals to apply a new precedent, Rayford v. American House Roseville I, LLC.

Dana Mark Gamarra v. Oakland County - Court Opinion

The Michigan Court of Appeals issued an opinion in Dana Mark Gamarra v. Oakland County, concerning an automobile accident. The court affirmed in part and reversed in part the trial court's decision regarding summary disposition for the defendants, remanding the case for further proceedings.

People of Michigan v. Terry McClellan - Stalking Conviction Affirmed

The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Terry McClellan for stalking. The court found sufficient evidence to support the jury's verdict, including repeated contact with the victim after a personal protection order was issued. The decision upholds the lower court's judgment.

People of Michigan v. Jeffrey Matthew Judovics - Criminal Case

The Michigan Court of Appeals reversed and remanded a criminal case against Jeffrey Matthew Judovics. The court ordered an in camera review of the complainant's psychological records, which the trial court had previously denied. This decision impacts discovery procedures in similar criminal cases.

Zurich American Insurance Company v. Mark Eubanks - Insurance Dispute

The Court of Appeals of Georgia reversed a trial court's $345 million judgment against insurers in a case involving sexual abuse claims against a school. The court found the insurers were not obligated to defend the school based on the consent judgments.

University Health Services v. Georgia Department of Community Health - CON Appeal

The Court of Appeals of Georgia affirmed a lower court's decision, upholding the Commissioner of the Georgia Department of Community Health's denial of University Health Services' application for a Certificate of Need to build a freestanding emergency department. The denial was based on updated factual circumstances since the initial application.

In the Interest of G. C. - Child Dependency Case Remanded

The Court of Appeals of Georgia remanded a child dependency case, In the Interest of G. C., to the Juvenile Court of Dawson County. The remand is for the appointment of appellate counsel after the original counsel moved to withdraw and indicated a different attorney represented the mother, who was previously prohibited from representing the mother by the juvenile court.

KIMMIYAA, LLC v. COFFEE BIANCO, LLC - Case Dismissed

The Court of Appeals of Georgia dismissed the appeal in KIMMIYAA, LLC v. COFFEE BIANCO, LLC due to the appellant's failure to timely file required documents. The dismissal follows a prior jury verdict in favor of Coffee Bianco and an award of attorney fees.

Leticia Guyton v. Tanja Boyd-Witherspoon - Case Transfer

The Court of Appeals of Georgia has transferred the case of Leticia Guyton v. Tanja Boyd-Witherspoon to the Magistrate Court of DeKalb County. The court determined it lacked jurisdiction over the appeal from the Magistrate Court's order.

Estate of Kitty Hk Felker - Appeal Vacated and Remanded

The Court of Appeals of Georgia vacated and remanded the dismissal of an appeal concerning the estate of Kitty Hk Felker. The court directed the superior court to transfer the appeal to the correct appellate court, finding that the initial dismissal was in error.

Garcia v. State - Georgia Appeals Court Dismisses Case

The Georgia Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal of Joshua Mariano Garcia due to an untimely filed notice of appeal. The court found that Garcia failed to file his notice of appeal within the ten-day window required after the court granted his discretionary application.

Wayland Braxton Willis v. Hon. Sheryl B. Jolly - Emergency Motion Denied

The Georgia Court of Appeals denied Wayland Braxton Willis's Petition for Writ of Mandamus in the case against Hon. Sheryl B. Jolly. The court cited its narrow original mandamus jurisdiction, which is exercised sparingly and typically only in matters related to an appeal or impending appeal.

Nichols v. Alghannam - Order Modifying Opinion

The California Court of Appeal has issued an order modifying its opinion in the case of Nichols v. Alghannam. The modifications involve adding the word 'former' before specific references to Civil Code section 3333.2, subdivision (c)(2), and adding a footnote clarifying its renumbering. There is no change in the judgment.

Contra Costa County Children and Family Services Bureau v. M.G. - Child Welfare Case

The 1st Appellate District of California has docketed case A173218, Contra Costa County Children and Family Services Bureau v. M.G. The filing date was May 12, 2025, and oral arguments are scheduled for February 24, 2026. This represents a new filing in the appellate court system.

Montecito Country Club v. Root - Civil Litigation

The Appellate Court of California, Second Appellate District, has docketed case B341762, Montecito Country Club, LLC v. Root et al. The case was filed on October 14, 2024, and oral arguments are scheduled for February 11, 2026. This entry pertains to the procedural status of ongoing civil litigation.

Doe v. Regents of University of California - Civil Litigation

The 1st Appellate District Court has updated case details for Doe v. Regents of the University of California, case number A170234. The filing date was March 22, 2024, and oral arguments are scheduled for February 13, 2026.

US files civil forfeiture complaints against $15.3M Iranian oil funds

US files civil forfeiture complaints against $15.3M Iranian oil funds

Colorado Public Health Officials Identify Additional Measles Cases

Colorado public health officials have identified four additional measles cases in Adams and Weld Counties, bringing the total number of cases tied to Broomfield High School and Broomfield Heights Middle School to a higher number. The notice provides updated information on known exposure locations and dates for the public.

Michael Huff v. Commonwealth of Kentucky - Criminal Appeal

The Kentucky Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's order denying Michael Huff's motion to vacate a judgment. Huff was appealing a conviction related to drug trafficking and being a persistent felony offender. The court found no error in the denial of his motion.

Michael D. Mallard v. Commonwealth of Kentucky - Affirming Opinion

The Kentucky Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision denying Michael D. Mallard's motion to reduce his prison sentence. The court found no error in the denial of his motion for relief under Kentucky Rules of Civil Procedure 60.02(f).

C.B. v. Cabinet for Health and Family Services - Child Abuse and Neglect Appeal

The Kentucky Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision finding child abuse and neglect by parents C.B. and W.J. The court reviewed findings related to injuries sustained by their minor children, Z.A.J. and Y.J.J. The appeal cases were consolidated for review.

Plumlee v. Commonwealth of Kentucky - Affirming Probation Revocation

The Court of Appeals of Kentucky affirmed a lower court's decision to revoke Natalie Plumlee's probation and impose a sentence of imprisonment. The court found that the lower court acted within its discretion based on the evidence presented.

Cress v. Commonwealth of Kentucky - Affirming Probation Revocation

The Court of Appeals of Kentucky affirmed two orders revoking Daniel A. Cress's probation in cases 21-CR-00732 and 21-CR-00752. The appeals stemmed from probation revocation orders issued in April 2024.

Cameron Sherlock v. Commonwealth of Kentucky - Affirming Judgment

The Court of Appeals of Kentucky affirmed a lower court's judgment finding Cameron Sherlock guilty of second-degree strangulation and being a Persistent Felony Offender II. The court found no error in the proceedings or the constitutionality of the statute under which Sherlock was convicted.

Fain v. Commonwealth - Affirming Probation Administration Ruling

The Kentucky Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's decision regarding the administration of a defendant's probation. The court ruled that the defendant must reside in Kentucky while on probation, despite also being subject to home placement in Ohio, and extended his probation by two years.

Brian Ferguson v. Commonwealth of Kentucky - Affirming Sentence Denial

The Kentucky Court of Appeals affirmed the Graves Circuit Court's denial of Brian Ferguson's motions to amend his sentence. The court found no error in the denial of Ferguson's RCr 111.42 and CR2 60.02 motions related to his 2008 conviction and subsequent sentence.

Reynolds v. Blair - Wrongful Death Appeal

The Kentucky Court of Appeals reversed and remanded a lower court's dismissal of a wrongful death lawsuit. The appellate court found that the dismissal for lack of prosecution was improper, allowing the case to proceed against the remaining defendants, Richard E. Blair, D.O., and Tara Henson, M.D.

Integra LifeSciences Recalls MediHoney and CVS Wound Dressings

The FDA announced a recall initiated by Integra LifeSciences for certain MediHoney and CVS Wound Gel products due to packaging failures that could lead to infection or delayed care. The recall involves removing affected products from service and distribution. Integra LifeSciences has reported 11 serious injuries related to MediHoney and three related to CVS Wound Gel.

Proposed Pell Grant and Workforce Pell Rules

The Department of Education has proposed new rules regarding Pell Grants and Workforce Pell Grants, focusing on accountability in higher education and access through demand-driven programs. The proposal includes changes to Pell Grant exclusions related to other grant aid. A public comment period is open until April 8, 2026.

Education Department HEAL Program Regs Comment Request

The Education Department has submitted information collection activities related to the Health Education Assistance Loan (HEAL) Program to the Office of Management and Budget for review. A comment period is open until April 8, 2026, allowing interested parties to provide input on the proposed regulations.

Executive Order Combating Cybercrime, Fraud, and Predatory Schemes

President Biden issued an Executive Order to combat cybercrime, fraud, and predatory schemes targeting American citizens. The order directs federal agencies to review and improve frameworks for countering Transnational Criminal Organizations (TCOs) and to develop an action plan within 120 days.

E.G.N. v. Warden, Stewart Detention Center - Habeas Corpus

The U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia issued an order in E.G.N. v. Warden, Stewart Detention Center, applying principles from prior cases to grant a petitioner seeking habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The court ordered respondents to provide the petitioner with a bond hearing.

Memas Country Store Delivery Prohibition Proceeding

The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) has initiated a delivery prohibition proceeding against Memas Country Store due to unresolved compliance issues related to underground storage tanks. A proceeding is scheduled for March 30, 2026.

California CDPH Advises Public to Avoid Sick Wildlife Due to H5N1 Bird Flu

The California Department of Public Health (CDPH) issued a notice urging the public to avoid contact with sick or dead wildlife after H5N1 bird flu was confirmed in northern elephant seal pups. The agency emphasizes a low risk to the public but advises caution and reporting of sick animals.

Vimal Patel Pharmacist Discipline and Public Complaint

The Florida Department of Health has a public complaint and disciplinary action on file for pharmacist Vimal G. Patel (License PS37396). The details of the disciplinary action are available via the provided link.

Pharmacist Alyssa Sanders Discipline on File

The Florida Department of Health has placed disciplinary action on file for Pharmacist Alyssa Marie Sanders (License Number PS67590). This action indicates a public complaint has been filed and requires review of the Discipline/Admin Action tab for details.

Pharmacy License Verification with Discipline

This document provides a verification of a pharmacy license, PH2470, for PELOT'S PHARMACY in Florida. The record indicates that there is disciplinary action and a public complaint on file for this license.

Jayda Krueger Pharmacy Technician License Suspended

The Florida Department of Health has suspended the pharmacy technician license of Jayda Krueger (License Number RPT118858). The license is set to expire on December 31, 2026, and the suspension is effective immediately. Discipline and public complaint information are on file.

Pharmacy Technician License Revoked

The Florida Department of Health has revoked the pharmacy technician license of Stacy Johnson Lewis (License Number RPT106728). The revocation is effective immediately, and the license expiration date was December 31, 2024. Further details regarding disciplinary actions are available through the Department.

Dalton Erickson Pharmacy Technician Discipline Florida

The Florida Department of Health has recorded disciplinary action against pharmacy technician Dalton Erickson. The license status is listed as 'Disc Relinquish', indicating a voluntary surrender or relinquishment of the license, with a public complaint also on file.

Pharmacy Technician License Revoked

The Florida Department of Health has revoked the pharmacy technician license of Maurissa Latrae Wheeler (License RPT72593). This action indicates a significant disciplinary measure taken against the individual's professional license.

Pharmacy Technician License Revoked

The Florida Department of Health has revoked the pharmacy technician license of Alexis Amanda Correa (RPT109247). The license status is listed as Revoked, with an expiration date of 12/31/2024. Discipline and a public complaint are on file.

Pharmacy License Probation for Harmony Discount Pharmacy

The Florida Department of Health has placed Harmony Discount Pharmacy LLC's pharmacy license (PH33486) on probation. This disciplinary action is effective April 25, 2024, and indicates a public complaint and disciplinary action on file.

Florida Pharmacy License Revoked

The Florida Department of Health has revoked the pharmacy license of Golden Glades Treatment Center. The license status was modified, and discipline is on file, indicating a significant regulatory action against the facility.

Serenity House Detox Palm Beach LLC Pharmacy License Revoked

The Florida Department of Health has revoked the pharmacy license for Serenity House Detox Palm Beach LLC. The license, PH29291, was originally issued on August 5, 2015, and had an expiration date of February 28, 2025. This action indicates a significant disciplinary measure against the facility.

Pharmacy Practitioner Discipline on File

The Florida Department of Health has updated the disciplinary record for Holiday CVS, LLC, and CVS Pharmacy #00319. The license verification indicates that there is discipline on file and a public complaint against the pharmacy.

Pharmacist Mary Stieber License Disciplinary Action

The Florida Department of Health has taken disciplinary action against Pharmacist Mary Stieber, resulting in the relinquishment of her license. The license status is now listed as 'Disc Relinquish'. Further details are available through the department's online portal.

OFAC Venezuela-Related General License 51

The Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has issued Venezuela-related General License 51, authorizing certain activities involving Venezuelan-origin gold. This license provides specific exemptions to sanctions regulations for authorized transactions.

Fried v. Booking Holdings Inc. - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, Fried v. Booking Holdings Inc., has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, bearing number 3:26-cv-01501-AGT, was filed on February 20, 2026, under diversity jurisdiction. A recent filing on March 7, 2026, involved a consent to proceed before a US Magistrate Judge.

Hinkelman v. State of Florida - Appeal Affirmed

The District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the decision of the lower court in Hinkelman v. State of Florida. The appeal, docketed as 2D2025-0337, concerned a case originating from the Pasco County Circuit Court. The appellate court's decision was issued on March 6, 2026.

Murray v. State of Florida - Appellate Court Opinion

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision in Murray v. State of Florida. The appellate court issued its opinion on March 6, 2026, with no known citations or subsequent citations.

State of Florida v. O'Shawn Narfetia King - Search Suppression Ruling

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal reversed a trial court's order suppressing evidence, finding that the mother's consent to search her son's bedroom was valid. The court remanded the case for further proceedings.

Clark v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision in Clark v. State of Florida. The appellate court's disposition was 'Affirmed' for docket number 2D2025-1827.

Clerk of Circuit Court Hillsborough County v. Rangel - Forfeiture Judgment Affirmance

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed an order setting aside a forfeiture judgment related to cash bonds posted in a criminal case. The court found that the depositor was entitled to discharge of the bonds due to the defendant's deportation, as per Florida Statutes.

First Acceptance Insurance Company, Inc. v. Auto Glass America, LLC - Civil Appeal

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court's decision in the case of First Acceptance Insurance Company, Inc. v. Auto Glass America, LLC. The appeal, docketed as 2D2025-0127, concerned a civil matter between an insurance company and an auto glass service provider.

Enfinger v. State of Florida - Affirmation of Lower Court Ruling

The District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the lower court's decision in Enfinger v. State of Florida. The appellate court issued a per curiam opinion affirming the disposition, with no further motions authorized under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Angel Hernandez v. Regency Place Homeowners' Association, Inc. - Appeal

The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed a lower tribunal's decision in the case of Angel Hernandez v. Regency Place Homeowners' Association, Inc. The court's disposition was an affirmation, with no specific compliance actions or penalties detailed in this opinion.

Lopez v. State of Florida - Affirmation of Lower Court Ruling

The District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the lower court's decision in Lopez v. State of Florida. The ruling, dated March 6, 2026, pertains to docket number 1D2024-2365. This action represents the final disposition of the appeal.

West v. West - Florida First District Court of Appeal Ruling

The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision in West v. West. The appellate court issued its disposition on March 6, 2026, with docket number 1D2025-1308. The ruling is not final until disposition of any timely motions.

Mahic v. State of Florida - Appeal Denied

The District Court of Appeal of Florida denied an appeal filed by Elvis Mahic against the State of Florida. The court treated the appeal of an order denying a motion to disqualify the judge as a petition for writ of prohibition and subsequently denied it. The decision was issued on March 6, 2026.

Woods v. State of Florida - Dismissed Case

The District Court of Appeal of Florida dismissed the case of Woods v. State of Florida, docket number 1D2025-3159. The dismissal was based on the appeal being untimely filed.

Florida Appeals Court Bars Pro Se Filings and Imposes Sanctions

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal has prohibited Lamar Jay Fullmer from making any further pro se filings concerning a specific past case due to abuse of the legal process. The court directed the Clerk of Court not to accept any future pro se filings from Fullmer for that case and to forward the opinion for consideration of disciplinary proceedings.

City of Tampa, Florida v. Liberty Hospitality Management, LLC - Rezoning Dispute

The Florida District Court of Appeal granted the City of Tampa's petition for a writ of mandamus, directing the circuit court to exercise its jurisdiction to review Liberty Hospitality Management's rezoning dispute. The case concerns the denial of a rezoning request for a hotel on Harbour Island.

NCAA v. Doctor Bradley - Appeal of Basketball Player Waiver

The NCAA is appealing a Florida District Court of Appeal's decision to grant a temporary injunction allowing basketball player Doctor Bradley a waiver to compete. The appellate court quashed the injunction, finding it facially deficient and unsupported by evidence, and reversed the trial court's order.

Sixth District Court of Appeal affirms life sentence for molestation

The Sixth District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed a life sentence for Matthew Edward Zink, who was convicted of lewd and lascivious molestation. The court found that any alleged error in sentencing regarding the Prison Releasee Reoffender designation was harmless.

Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. Wendy D. Montgomery - Property Insurance Case Affirmation

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court's decision in the property insurance case involving Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Company and Wendy D. Montgomery. The court's disposition was an affirmation, and the conditional cross-appeal was dismissed as moot.

Owens v. State of Florida - Belated Appeal Granted

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal granted Anthony P. Owens, Jr.'s petition for a belated appeal in Case No. 5D2025-3932. The court's order will be filed with the trial court and treated as a notice of appeal from a January 24, 2024 judgment and sentence.

Robinson v. State of Florida - Appellate Opinion

The District Court of Appeal of Florida issued an opinion in Robinson v. State of Florida, affirming the lower court's decision. The case involves an appeal from the Circuit Court for Gadsden County. No specific compliance actions or penalties are detailed in this opinion.

Lane v. State of Florida - Affirmation of Lower Court Ruling

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's ruling in Lane v. State of Florida. The appellate court's decision, issued on March 6, 2026, upholds the original disposition without modification. The case involves an appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County.

SBK ART LLC v. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP - Discovery for Foreign Litigation

The Second Circuit affirmed a District Court order granting SBK ART LLC's petition for discovery under 28 U.S.C. §1782 for use in foreign litigation. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP appealed, arguing the documents sought were not discoverable from their client abroad, but the court disagreed.

Care One LLC v NLRB - Court Opinion

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's denial of a preliminary injunction sought by Care One LLC and affiliated healthcare facilities. The facilities sought to halt NLRB proceedings, arguing the ALJ was improperly appointed and protected from removal. The court found the plaintiffs could not demonstrate irreparable harm.

Mar-Can Transport vs Local 854 Pension Fund - ERISA Withdrawal Liability

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision in Mar-Can Transport Co. v. Local 854 Pension Fund, ruling that Mar-Can is entitled to a $1.8 million reduction in its ERISA withdrawal liability. The court interpreted a key provision of ERISA concerning the transfer of unfunded vested benefits when employees switch union representation.

B.B. v. Hochul - Child Welfare Certification Rights

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed in part and affirmed in part a district court's dismissal of a case brought by foster children against New York officials. The court found that the plaintiffs have standing to challenge the state's certification scheme for relative foster parents and adoption, reversing the district court's ruling on standing.

Broadcast Music v. Concert Promoters - Antitrust Licensing Fees

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a district court's decision regarding music licensing fees set by Broadcast Music, Inc. (BMI) for concert promoters. The court found the imposed rates and expanded definition of gross revenues to be unreasonable, remanding the case for further proceedings.

McGucken v. Shutterstock, Inc. - Copyright Infringement Appeal

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals partially affirmed and partially vacated a district court's ruling in McGucken v. Shutterstock, Inc. The court affirmed the dismissal of copyright management information claims but vacated the summary judgment on copyright infringement claims, remanding for further proceedings on specific factual issues.

Reidy Contracting Group v. Mt. Hawley Insurance - Insurance Coverage Dispute

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision in favor of Reidy Contracting Group, holding that Mt. Hawley Insurance Company must provide additional insured coverage. The court found Reidy to be an additional insured and that the Employers Liability Exclusion was ambiguous and thus construed against Mt. Hawley.

Connecticut Fair Housing Center v. CoreLogic Rental Property Solutions - Housing Discrimination

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on a housing discrimination case involving CoreLogic Rental Property Solutions. The court vacated in part, affirmed in part, and reversed in part the district court's decision regarding claims of disparate impact under the Fair Housing Act and violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

United States v. William Jimenez - Appeal of Conviction Conditions

The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed a district court's judgment against William Jimenez. The court found that the special conditions of supervised release, including electronic device searches and mental health counseling, were properly imposed and that an appeal waiver barred challenges to his sentence term.

Safdieh v. Commissioner - Tax Penalty Assessment

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Commissioner of Internal Revenue may assess penalties for failure to report foreign business control under IRC § 6038(b) through administrative assessment, overturning a Tax Court decision. This ruling impacts how the IRS collects such penalties.

Kellogg v. Nichols - Judicial Immunity and Firearms Licensing

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals amended its opinion in Kellogg v. Nichols, affirming that state judges have absolute judicial immunity for decisions on firearms license applications. The court also held that Article III's case-or-controversy requirement bars federal claims for injunctive and declaratory relief against judges in their official capacities regarding these decisions.

Peña Garcia v. Department of Labor - Workers' Compensation

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals denied a petition for review in Peña Garcia v. Department of Labor. The court affirmed the denial of reimbursement for medical cannabis-infused edibles under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act, citing the Controlled Substances Act.

US v. Cardenas - Second Circuit Court of Appeals Opinion

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the conviction of Jay James Roldan Cardenas for conspiracy to import cocaine. The court found that the district court erred in excluding evidence crucial to Cardenas's defense of lacking criminal intent, remanding the case for further proceedings.

United States v. Aryeetey - Felon in Possession of Firearm

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction and sentence of Ivan Joel Aryeetey for being a felon in possession of a firearm. The court found no abuse of discretion in admitting DNA evidence and deemed the sentence substantively reasonable.

Colorado Legislature: Memorializing Senator MaryAnne Tebedo

A memorial resolution has been introduced in the Colorado Legislature to honor former Senator MaryAnne Tebedo. The resolution is currently under consideration and has a scheduled Senate consideration of memorials on March 17, 2026.

Colorado Resolution Recognizing Bob Holder's 50 Years of Service

The Colorado State Legislature passed House Resolution 26-1002 recognizing Bob Holder for his fifty years of service as a district wildlife manager. The resolution was introduced and passed in the 2026 Regular Session.

Colorado Bill Requires Warning Labels for Hair Products with Carcinogens

Colorado Bill HB26-1135 proposes the "Hair Product Transparency and Safety Act," requiring warning labels on hair relaxers and synthetic hairpieces containing intentionally added carcinogens or reproductive toxicants. This act, effective July 1, 2027, aims to increase transparency for consumers regarding product ingredients.

Colorado Bill Modifies Prepaid Wireless Telecom Service Charges

Colorado's HB26-1115 modifies charges on prepaid wireless telecommunications services, including the 911, 988, and telephone disability access (TDA) charges. The bill clarifies definitions, remittance procedures, and disclosure of tax information, with some modifications to who is subject to the charges.

Colorado Bill SB26-087: Legislative Leave Job Protection

Colorado Bill SB26-087 proposes to create legislative leave job protection for members of the General Assembly. The bill would prohibit employers from terminating qualified members who request or take leave during legislative sessions and require restoration to the same or equivalent position upon return.

Colorado Bill HB26-1325 Concerning Natural Medicine

Colorado House Bill HB26-1325 has been introduced concerning natural medicine. The bill is currently in the 'Under Consideration' stage and has been assigned to the House Health & Human Services Committee.

Colorado Bill: Vision Tests for Pre-Kindergarten Students

Colorado's HB26-1193, introduced for the 2026 Regular Session, proposes to require school districts to administer vision tests to pre-kindergarten students. This bill expands current vision testing mandates, which currently cover kindergarten through ninth grade.

Colorado Bill: Theft by Contractor Using Advance Payments

Colorado Bill HB26-1245, introduced for the 2026 Regular Session, proposes new regulations concerning theft by contractors. The bill specifies that using advance payments for unrelated purposes, leading to project delay or abandonment, constitutes theft. It also mandates written disclosures to customers regarding the intended use of advance payments.

Colorado Recognizes October as Conflict Resolution Month

Colorado has introduced a resolution to recognize October 2026 as Conflict Resolution Month. The resolution is currently under consideration by the Colorado Senate. This designation aims to promote awareness and practice of conflict resolution techniques.

Colorado Bill HB26-1068: Remote Participation Policies for Joint Committees

Colorado Bill HB26-1068 proposes to expand the authority of the executive committee of the legislative council to establish policies for remote participation in joint committee meetings. This change would allow legislators to participate remotely in any joint committee meetings held at any time of the year.

Colorado Designates International Women's Day

The Colorado legislature has introduced House Joint Resolution 26-1020, designating March 8, 2026, as International Women's Day in Colorado. The resolution acknowledges the historical and contemporary contributions of women.

Colorado HB26-1152: Supplemental Appropriation to Department of Early Childhood

Colorado Bill HB26-1152 enacts a supplemental appropriation to the Department of Early Childhood for the 2026 Regular Session. This bill concerns state revenue and budget, providing additional funds to the department.

Palladium CVD Investigation: Preliminary Affirmative Determination

The U.S. Department of Commerce announced a preliminary affirmative determination in the countervailing duty investigation of unwrought palladium from the Russian Federation. Preliminary subsidy rates for Russian exporters were determined to be 109.10%. The final determination is scheduled for May 20, 2026.

SEC Obtains Final Judgment Against Investment Adviser in Cherry-Picking Scheme

The SEC announced it has obtained a final judgment against Matthew J. Werthe, dba HSR Wealth Management, for engaging in a cherry-picking scheme. The judgment orders Werthe to pay disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and a civil penalty totaling over $1.1 million.

Illinois Releases Carbon Monoxide Surveillance Report

The Illinois Department of Public Health has released its first carbon monoxide surveillance report, detailing unintentional CO exposures from 2019-2023. The report highlights an average of 940 ED visits, 126 hospital admissions, and nearly 57 deaths annually, aiming to strengthen prevention and awareness efforts.

Illinois Tax Season Public Health Voluntary Contribution Program

The Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) is reminding taxpayers about the voluntary contribution program available when filing their state tax returns. Taxpayers can designate a portion of their refund to support various health-related funds, including those for Alzheimer's research, diabetes research, and assistance for the homeless.

Roe CL 285 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. - Personal Injury Product Liability

A new personal injury product liability case, Roe CL 285 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al., was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on March 6, 2026. The case, assigned docket number 3:26-cv-01974-CRB, involves claims of personal injury and product liability against Uber Technologies, Inc. and other defendants.

Hooper v. Monsanto Company - Personal Injury Product Liability

A new case, Hooper et al v. Monsanto Company et al, was filed on March 6, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves personal injury and product liability claims under diversity jurisdiction. A conditional transfer order was also filed.

Zhu v. Equativ Inc. - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, Zhu v. Equativ Inc., was filed on March 6, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, identified by docket number 3:26-cv-01976, is based on diversity jurisdiction and involves a claim of Personal Injury: Other. The initial filings include a complaint and proposed summons.

Mazor v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company - ERISA Labor Law

A new civil case, Mazor v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, was filed on March 6, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case concerns labor law under ERISA and was filed by Eli Mazor against Metropolitan Life Insurance Company.

A.S. v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons) - Civil Case Filing

A civil case, identified as A.S. v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons) et al, was filed on March 6, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case number is 3:26-cv-01982. The filing includes a complaint, proposed summons, and motions regarding plaintiff anonymity and proceeding before a US Magistrate Judge.

Conant v Evergreen Alliance Golf Limited - Civil Case

A new civil case, Conant v Evergreen Alliance Golf Limited, was filed on March 6, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a Notice of Removal from Alameda County Superior Court and is based on diversity jurisdiction.

Petillo v. US - Prison Condition Case

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California has filed a new civil case, Case Number 5:26-cv-01950-VKD, titled Petillo v. US. The case involves a federal question related to prisoner conditions and was filed on March 6, 2026.

US Right to Know v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services - FOIA Lawsuit

US Right to Know has filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, filed on March 6, 2026, concerns a Freedom of Information Act request. The filing includes a complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief.

Pontiac Police Retirement System v Soleno Therapeutics - Securities Fraud

The City of Pontiac Police and Fire Retirement System has filed a securities fraud lawsuit against Soleno Therapeutics, Inc. and its executives. The case, filed on March 6, 2026, alleges violations of federal securities laws. This action initiates a class action lawsuit.

F. v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons) - Civil Rights Case

A civil rights case was filed on March 6, 2026, against the United States of America and the Federal Bureau of Prisons. The case, identified as Case Number 4:26-cv-01977, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

ASADI v. US Dept of Education - Federal Question Mandamus

A new civil case, ASADI v. US Dept of Education, was filed on March 6, 2026, in the US District Court for the Northern District of California. The case is based on a Federal Question and seeks a Mandamus. The initial filings include a complaint and a proposed scheduling order.

K.S. v. United States of America et al - Civil Rights Case

A new civil rights case, K.S. v. United States of America et al, was filed on March 6, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a U.S. Government Defendant and is classified under Civil Rights: Other. The filing includes a complaint and a request to proceed under a pseudonym.

A.C. v. United States of America - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, A.C. v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons) et al, was filed on March 6, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case number is 3:26-cv-01983. Initial filings include a complaint, proposed summons, a motion to maintain anonymity, and a consent to proceed before a US Magistrate Judge.

A.T. v. United States - Civil Rights Case

A civil rights case, A.T. v. United States, was filed on March 6, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves the U.S. government as a defendant and concerns civil rights.

CrowdStrike Inc. v. AIStrike Inc. - Trademark Case

CrowdStrike Inc. has filed a trademark infringement lawsuit against AIStrike Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, filed on March 6, 2026, concerns alleged trademark violations. No specific penalties or compliance deadlines have been detailed in the initial filing.

Simutis v. Kakkis et al - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, Simutis v. Kakkis et al, was filed on March 6, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, bearing number 3:26-cv-01985, is based on a Federal Question and involves Stockholders Suits.

Thomas v. Rodgers et al - Stockholders Suit

A new civil case, Thomas v. Rodgers et al, was filed on March 6, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case is a stockholder suit based on diversity jurisdiction. No recent filings or case summary are available.

Dunagan v. Technical Education Services, Inc. - Civil Rights: Jobs

A Notice of Removal was filed on March 6, 2026, in the case Dunagan v. Technical Education Services, Inc. The case, involving Civil Rights and Jobs, was removed from Alameda County Superior Court to the US District Court for the Northern District of California. Technical Education Services, Inc. is the filing party.

California State University v. US Department of Education - Administrative Review

The Board of Trustees of the California State University has filed a civil case against the US Department of Education. The case, filed on March 6, 2026, seeks an injunction against the US government or vacatur of an agency decision under the Administrative Procedures Act.

Uriarte v. BMO Bank, N.A - Real Property Case

A new civil case, Uriarte v. BMO Bank, N.A., was filed on March 6, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves real property and includes an ex parte application for a temporary restraining order to enjoin a sale scheduled for March 12, 2026.

Gopi Valliammal et al v. Edlow et al - Immigration Action

A new civil case, Gopi Valliammal et al v. Edlow et al, was filed on March 6, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves 'Other Immigration Actions' with the U.S. Government listed as a defendant. The initial filings include a complaint and proposed summons.

B. et al v. TikTok Inc. et al - Personal Injury Product Liability

A civil case was filed on March 6, 2026, against TikTok Inc., Google LLC, and Snap, Inc. The case, identified as 4:26-cv-01965 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, is based on diversity jurisdiction and concerns personal injury product liability.

Syrian National Extradited for Human Smuggling Investigation

Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) El Paso announced the extradition of a Syrian national, Jalal Maklad Adeeb, to the U.S. to face charges related to a human smuggling operation. Adeeb is accused of leading an international network that smuggled hundreds of individuals into the U.S. for financial gain, collecting approximately $800,000 in fees.

ICE Custody Death Notification: Pejman Karshenas Najafabadi

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) announced the death of Pejman Karshenas Najafabadi, a 59-year-old Iranian national, in ICE custody in Natchez, Mississippi, on March 1, 2026. Najafabadi passed away from cardiac arrest at Merit Health Hospital after receiving medical care for pre-existing conditions. ICE is required to publicize such in-custody death reports.

Haitian man facing assault charges died in ICE custody

ICE announced the death of Emanuel Cleeford Damas, an individual facing criminal charges for assault and battery, while in ICE custody in Scottsdale, Arizona on March 2, 2026. Damas had a pending immigration case and was detained under the Lanken Riley Act.

Texas Government Accountability Association v. City of Odessa - Dismissed

The Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District, has dismissed the appeal in Texas Government Accountability Association v. City of Odessa. The appellant filed a notice of withdrawal, indicating they no longer wished to pursue the appeal of the trial court's decision which declared an interlocal agreement void and unenforceable.

Texas Court of Appeals Affirms Child Termination of Parental Rights

The Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District, affirmed a trial court's order terminating the parental rights of a mother and father. The appellate court found the mother's appeal to be frivolous and without merit, following procedures outlined in Anders v. California.

Wally Yammine v. Warren Fonville, PLLC - Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

The Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District, has dismissed the appeal in Wally Yammine v. Warren Fonville, PLLC, for want of jurisdiction. The court found that the appellant, acting as executor, lacked the capacity to represent the estate in the appeal.

Tony Chavez v. State of Texas - Habeas Corpus - Bail Dismissed

The Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District, dismissed Tony Chavez's original proceeding seeking a bond reduction. The court found it lacked original habeas jurisdiction in criminal cases, as such jurisdiction is limited to county courts, district courts, and the Court of Criminal Appeals. The proceeding was dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Griffin Energy Law v. Billingsley - Real Estate Title Dispute

The Texas Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's decision in a real estate title dispute concerning mineral interests. The court found that the appellees successfully rebutted the community property presumption with clear and convincing evidence, upholding the judgment in their favor.

Draft Guidance: Responding to FDA Form 483 Observations for Drug Manufacturers

The FDA has issued draft guidance for drug manufacturers on how to respond to observations noted on FDA Form 483 following CGMP inspections. This guidance is intended to assist domestic and foreign manufacturers in assessing conformity with CGMP requirements.

Colorado Warns of Online Investment Scams During Consumer Protection Week

The Colorado Division of Securities issued a warning about online investment scams during National Consumer Protection Week. The notice highlights common schemes like unsolicited cryptocurrency fraud and romance scams, referencing FTC data on significant financial losses to these activities.

Thomas v. Rodgers et al - Securities/Commodities Civil Case

A new civil case, Thomas v. Rodgers et al., was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on March 6, 2026. The case involves securities and commodities and includes a Verified Stockholder Derivative Complaint.

Legends Bank v. Orusa - Appeal Dismissed for Late Filing

The Tennessee Court of Appeals dismissed an appeal filed by Samson Orusa against Legends Bank and the Tennessee Department of Revenue. The dismissal was due to the appellant failing to file the notice of appeal with the Appellate Court Clerk within the mandatory 30-day period after the order was entered.

State-Funded Cleanup Enables New Affordable Housing

The California Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) announced the opening of 43 new affordable homes in Richmond, funded by a state cleanup program. This project is part of a larger initiative to convert contaminated land into safe housing, with over 200 homes expected across three sites this year.

Freedom of Information Act Implementing Regulations Updated

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has updated its Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) implementing regulations. These changes aim to enhance clarity and efficiency in processing FOIA requests. The rule is effective March 6, 2026.

State AG Criticizes Aquarion Sale Approval, Citing Doubled Water Bills

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong criticized the Public Utilities Regulatory Authority's preliminary approval of the Aquarion water company sale to a nonprofit, projecting doubled water bills for consumers. The decision reverses a prior denial and is expected to significantly impact public oversight and consumer protections.

US v. John McLaurin - Criminal Case Vacated and Remanded

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated and remanded the criminal case of US v. John McLaurin. The court found that discretionary supervised release conditions not orally pronounced at sentencing are nullities, impacting the revocation judgment. The case is remanded for resentencing.

Cedar Coal Company v. Director, DOWCP - Black Lung Benefits Decision

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals denied Cedar Coal Company's petition to review an order awarding black lung benefits to the estate of Roger L. Mullins. The court found that the Administrative Law Judge's decision was supported by substantial evidence and that the claimant presented sufficient evidence within regulatory limitations.

State v. Lanier - Ohio Court of Appeals Affirms Trial Judgment

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's judgment in the consolidated cases of State v. Lanier. The court found that the record clearly and convincingly supported the trial court's findings regarding the sentences imposed on the appellant.

State v. Norman - Resentencing Remand

The Ohio Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the case of State v. Norman for resentencing. The trial court failed to provide required notifications under the Reagan Tokes Act during the initial sentencing. The judgment is affirmed in all other respects.

State v. Johnson - Appeal Dismissed as Moot

The Ohio Court of Appeals dismissed an appeal in State v. Johnson as moot because the appellant had already served his jail sentence. The court noted that the appeal concerned a judgment revoking community control sanctions.

State v. Trotter - Criminal Appeal

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's judgment in State v. Trotter, finding that the appellant's plea of no contest was voluntary and knowingly made. The court addressed an assignment of error regarding ineffective assistance of counsel.

State v. Dominguez-Olivia - Speedy Trial and Due Process Rights

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a defendant's convictions, ruling that his statutory and constitutional speedy trial rights, as well as his due process rights, were not violated. The court found sufficient evidence supported the convictions and that they were not against the manifest weight of the evidence.

State v. Giron - Motion to Suppress OVI

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's decision in State v. Giron, denying a motion to suppress evidence in an OVI case. The court found reasonable suspicion for the traffic stop and probable cause for the arrest, and permitted an amendment to the OVI charge without prejudice to the defendant.

State v. Wilson - Public Records Denial

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's decision denying a defendant's motions for public records. The court found the motions were barred by res judicata and the information sought was not necessary for a justiciable claim.

State v. Johnson - Child Victim Testimony Statute Violation

The Ohio Court of Appeals reversed and vacated parts of a trial court's judgment against Chadwick Johnson, finding that the trial court violated Johnson's right to confrontation by allowing child victims to testify outside his presence without proper findings. The appellate court remanded the case for a new trial on specific charges due to insufficient evidence.

State v. Fogle - Dog Bite Restitution Upheld

The Ohio Court of Appeals upheld a trial court's order for restitution of $265.92 against Ellen Fogle, whose dog bit a neighbor and attacked the neighbor's dog. The court found sufficient evidence to support the restitution order in this consolidated appeal.

State v. Kynard - Criminal Sentencing Appeal

The Ohio Court of Appeals reversed a trial court's judgment regarding consecutive sentencing. The case is remanded for the limited purpose of providing post-release control notification to the defendant. The court found the original sentencing order improperly imposed a consecutive sentence to another unsentenced case.

Finn v. Rutherford - Landlord-Tenant Dispute Affirmed

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's judgment in Finn v. Rutherford, a landlord-tenant dispute. The appellate court found that the appellant failed to present objections to the magistrate's decision and did not file a transcript, preventing a review of the merits.

NVR, Inc. v. Pearce - Motion for Reargument Denied

The Delaware Superior Court denied a defendant's motion for reargument in the case of NVR, Inc. v. Pearce. The court found that the defendant raised new arguments for the first time and that the original judgment was valid, denying the motion for reconsideration.

Careen, Inc. v. ZeroAvia, Inc. - Contract Dispute

Careen, Inc. has filed a civil complaint against ZeroAvia, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, Case Number 5:26-cv-01986, was filed on March 6, 2026, and pertains to a contract dispute. Initial filings include the complaint and proposed summons.

State of Tennessee v. John Bassett - Murder Conviction Appeal

The Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed John Bassett's murder conviction but reversed his life sentence without parole. The case is remanded for resentencing. The court found insufficient evidence to support the enhanced sentence based on the murder being especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel.

Tennessee v. Smith - Affirmation of Murder and Theft Convictions

The Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the convictions of Raymond Antonio Smith for first-degree premeditated murder and theft. The court found sufficient evidence to support the convictions and the value of the stolen property. The defendant is serving a life sentence plus twelve years.

Cedric Hopgood v. State of Tennessee - Plea Withdrawal Denial

The Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed a trial court's denial of Cedric Hopgood's motion to withdraw his guilty pleas for drug possession offenses. The court found no error in the denial, upholding the agreed-upon sentence.

State of Tennessee v. Vidal Chad Bryant - Drug and Firearm Offenses Sentencing Appeal

The Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the trial court's denial of Vidal Chad Bryant's motion to suspend his six-year sentence for drug and firearm offenses. The court found no abuse of discretion in the trial court's decision.

NINDS Rescinds Policy on Special Council Review of Research Applications

The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) has issued a notice rescinding its policy on Special Council Review of Research Applications, effective immediately. This rescission refers applicants to the broader NIH policy on the same matter.

AHRQ Health Services Research Dissertation Program (R36) Expired

The Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality (AHRQ) has issued a notice announcing the immediate expiration of the Health Services Research Dissertation Program (R36), previously identified by PA-23-196. No further applications will be accepted under this funding opportunity announcement.

AHRQ Health Services Grants PA-24-156 Expiration Notice

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) has issued a notice announcing the early expiration of Funding Opportunity Announcement PA-24-156 for Health Services Research Demonstration and Dissemination Grants (R18). No further applications will be accepted under this announcement.

AHRQ Notice: Primary Care Research R01 Funding Opportunity Expired

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) has issued a notice announcing the early expiration of the Research to Advance the Science of Primary Care (R01) funding opportunity announcement (PA-24-205). No further applications will be accepted under this announcement.

AHRQ Primary Care Research Funding Opportunity Expired

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) has issued a notice announcing the early expiration of funding opportunity PA-23-115, 'AHRQ Small Research Projects to Advance the Science of Primary Care (R03)'. No further applications will be accepted under this announcement.

State v. Sundwall - Utah Court of Appeals Opinion

The Utah Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision to deny bail to Meggan Randall Sundwall, who is charged with aggravated murder and obstruction of justice. The appellate court found that the district court did not err in determining that Sundwall posed a flight risk based on clear and convincing evidence.

State v. Alvarez - Utah Court of Appeals Opinion

The Utah Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions of Jose Humberto Mancia, Argenis Daniel Ramirez Saedt, and Rosalio Andres Alvarez for two counts of murder. The defendants appealed, arguing ineffective assistance of counsel, but the court found no merit in these claims.

State v. Saedt - Criminal Appeal

The Utah Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions of Jose Humberto Mancia, Argenis Daniel Ramirez Saedt, and Rosalio Andres Alvarez for two counts of murder. The defendants appealed, arguing ineffective assistance of counsel, but the court found no merit in their claims.

State v. Devore - Utah Court of Appeals Opinion

The Utah Court of Appeals affirmed an order for additional restitution against Christopher Earl Devore. Devore was ordered to pay nearly $30,000 for a victim's nasal reconstruction surgery, stemming from a 2018 burglary conviction. The court found Devore's arguments regarding the timeliness of the restitution request and the proximate cause of the injury unpersuasive.

State v. Mancia - Utah Court of Appeals Opinion

The Utah Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions of Jose Humberto Mancia, Argenis Daniel Ramirez Saedt, and Rosalio Andres Alvarez for two counts of murder. The defendants appealed, arguing ineffective assistance of counsel, but the court found no merit in their claims.

State v. Anderson - Utah Court of Appeals Opinion

The Utah Court of Appeals filed an opinion in State v. Anderson on March 5, 2026. The case involves a challenge to the denial of a motion to suppress evidence found during a vehicle search following an arrest on outstanding warrants. The court affirmed the lower court's decision.

Reese v. Reese - Utah Court of Appeals Child Support Ruling

The Utah Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's denial of a motion to set aside a child support provision in a divorce decree. The appellant argued the provision was void due to being part of a postnuptial agreement, but the court found the statute cited applied only to premarital agreements.

Mcaneeley v. Fukushima - Harassment Injunction Appeal

The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals is reviewing an appeal filed by Doreen Fukushima against an injunction against harassment issued by the District Court of the First Circuit. Fukushima argues the injunction violated her constitutional rights. The court's decision will impact the application of harassment laws and due process in the state.

Hawai'i Government Employees Association v. Department of Public Safety - Court Opinion Correction

The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals has issued an order correcting minor typographical errors in its August 18, 2025 opinion in Hawai'i Government Employees Association v. Department of Public Safety. The corrections involve specific word changes and formatting adjustments within the published text.

Hircajo III v. State - Court Opinion

The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals issued an opinion on March 6, 2026, in Hircajo III v. State. The court dismissed a motion for reconsideration as untimely, citing the Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Newtown Estates Community Association v. Walk the Good Life, LLC - Appeal

The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's judgment in favor of Newtown Estates Community Association against Walk the Good Life, LLC. The case involved alleged violations of community association Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions.

Meredith Summer v. Detroit Pub. Schs. - Employment Discrimination Appeal

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Detroit Public Schools. The case involved claims of First Amendment retaliation and religious discrimination brought by a former teacher, Meredith Summer.

US v. Patrick Craig Harrison - Court Opinion

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision in United States v. Patrick Craig Harrison. The court upheld the imposition of a $5,000 Justice for Victims of Trafficking Act (JVTA) special assessment and a five-year term of supervised release, rejecting Harrison's arguments regarding indigence and sentence unreasonableness.

Marquetta Williams v. City of Canton, Ohio - Qualified Immunity

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on a qualified immunity defense in the case of Marquetta Williams v. City of Canton, Ohio. The court found that a key factual dispute regarding an officer's use of deadly force requires a jury determination, potentially impacting future use-of-force cases.

Brown-Forman Corp. v. NLRB - Sixth Circuit Court Opinion

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion in Brown-Forman Corporation v. NLRB, concerning labor disputes at Brown-Forman's Woodford Reserve facility. The case involves a petition for review and cross-application for enforcement of an order from the National Labor Relations Board.

HPIL Holding Inc. v. Harry Zhang - Sixth Circuit Court Opinion

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a district court's dismissal of a lawsuit filed by HPIL Holding, Inc. The court found that the Rooker-Feldman doctrine did not apply, allowing the case to proceed. The lawsuit alleges minority shareholders looted the corporation during a receivership proceeding.

Adams v. ANB Bank - Wyoming Supreme Court Opinion

The Wyoming Supreme Court issued an opinion in Adams v. ANB Bank, reversing a lower court's decision regarding counterclaims and attorney fees. The court affirmed the dismissal of the Adams Family Parties' claims but reversed the summary judgment on counterclaims and the award of attorney fees to the banks.

Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals Adopts 2026 Jury Instructions

The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals has adopted the 2026 revisions to the Oklahoma Uniform Jury Instructions-Criminal (Second Edition). These updated instructions, submitted by the Committee for Preparation of Uniform Criminal Jury Instructions, are effective immediately and will be provided to District Courts for implementation.

SEC v. Zachary Miller - Administrative and Cease-and-Desist Proceedings

The SEC has instituted administrative and cease-and-desist proceedings against Zachary Miller for acting as an unregistered broker in connection with fraudulent and unregistered securities offerings. Miller allegedly raised approximately $18.3 million from investors.

SEC Institutes Proceedings Against Canaccord Genuity LLC for Failing to File SARs

The SEC has instituted administrative and cease-and-desist proceedings against Canaccord Genuity LLC for failing to file approximately 150 Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) related to its equity trading activities between February 2019 and March 2022. The firm allegedly failed to maintain an adequate AML surveillance program.

SEC charges EisnerAmper LLP with improper professional conduct

The SEC has instituted administrative and cease-and-desist proceedings against EisnerAmper LLP for improper professional conduct during its 2020 audit of the Infinity Q Diversified Alpha Fund. The firm allegedly failed to obtain sufficient understanding of internal controls, gather adequate evidence, and exercise due professional care, violating PCAOB auditing standards.

SEC Institutes Cease-and-Desist Proceedings Against NYSE

The SEC has instituted cease-and-desist proceedings against the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) LLC. This action stems from a critical systems disruption on January 24, 2023, which caused NYSE to fail to run opening auctions for 2,824 securities, leading to market-wide impacts including thousands of busted trades.

SEC Bars Joel Castellanos for Unregistered Securities Sales

The SEC has barred Joel Castellanos from associating with any broker, dealer, or other regulated entity. Castellanos was found to have solicited and raised at least $25.2 million from over 1,222 investors through unregistered securities sales, acting as a sales agent for MJ Capital Funding, LLC.

Delaware Court of Chancery Land Dispute Ruling

The Delaware Court of Chancery issued a final ruling in a land dispute case (C.A. No. 2023-0601-LM). The court granted plaintiffs' claim for adverse possession regarding a portion of the disputed land, while denying their other claims for prescriptive easement or easement by necessity.

Hawai'i Government Employees Association v. Department of Public Safety - Order of Correction

The Intermediate Court of Appeals of the State of Hawai'i has issued an order of correction for its opinion in Hawai'i Government Employees Association v. Department of Public Safety. The correction involves minor edits to specific words and punctuation within the published opinion.

McAneeley v. Fukushima - Injunction Against Harassment Appeal

The Intermediate Court of Appeals of the State of Hawaiʻi issued a summary disposition order in the case of McAneeley v. Fukushima. The appeal concerned an injunction against harassment, with the appellant raising issues of due process and freedom of speech. The court affirmed the lower court's decision.

Sandomire v. Brown - Order Rejecting Writ of Certiorari

The Supreme Court of the State of Hawaiʻi has rejected an application for a writ of certiorari filed by Petitioners/Defendants-Appellants David Edward Brown and Lanhua Kao Brown in the case Sandomire v. Brown. This order, issued on March 6, 2026, signifies the final disposition of the certiorari request.

Ernest Horcajo III v. State - Order Dismissing Reconsideration Motion

The Intermediate Court of Appeals of the State of Hawaiʻi dismissed a motion for reconsideration filed by Ernest Horcajo III as untimely. The motion was filed after the deadline established by the Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Newtown Estates Community Association v. Walk the Good Life, LLC - Affirmation of Judgment

The Intermediate Court of Appeals of the State of Hawaii affirmed a judgment against Walk the Good Life, LLC in favor of Newtown Estates Community Association. The case involved alleged violations of the Association's Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions.

Svoboda v. Amazon.com Inc. - Biometric Information Privacy Act Class Action

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision to certify a class action against Amazon.com Inc. concerning the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA). The case involves Amazon's Virtual Try-On feature and the alleged capture and use of facial data.

United States v. Jerron D. Williams - Seventh Circuit Opinion

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed an appeal filed by Jerron Williams concerning his conviction for assaulting a federal employee and using a gun during a crime of violence. The court found that Williams waived his argument regarding the classification of the assault as a crime of violence.

Villalobos v. Picicco - Constitutional Tort Case

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a district court's partial summary judgment for Elias Villalobos in a constitutional tort case against police officers. The court remanded the case, instructing parties to address both prongs of the qualified immunity test regarding the officers' entry into Villalobos's home.

Svoboda v. Amazon.com Inc. - Court Opinion

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals denied Amazon.com Inc.'s petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc in the case Tanya Svoboda v. Amazon.com Inc. The court amended its prior opinion, clarifying the district court's discretion to award damages on a classwide basis.

Latosha Bowlin v. Board of Directors, Judah Christian School - Employment Discrimination

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of a Title VII claim brought by three school employees who refused COVID-19 vaccination and testing due to religious beliefs. The court found no religious objection to the testing requirement and that accommodating the employees would contradict state executive orders.

Majeika v. Rhode Island Supreme Court Opinion

The Rhode Island Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's dismissal of a property owner's appeal regarding the denial of an onsite wastewater treatment system application. The court found the plaintiffs failed to establish a continuing violation and lacked standing for a facial challenge to regulations.

Innospec v. Aurorium - Motion to Dismiss

The U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware issued a Report and Recommendation regarding a motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Aurorium Holdings LLC, et al. in the case Innospec Inc. v. Aurorium Holdings LLC. The court reviewed the legal standards for a motion to dismiss under FRCP 12(b)(6).

Thomas v. Claymont Associates, LLC - Motion for Judgment on Pleadings

The Delaware Superior Court is considering a motion for judgment on the pleadings in the case of Thomas v. Claymont Associates, LLC. The defendant, Easy Money Group Acquisition Co., LLC, argues it is not responsible for the plaintiff's alleged slip and fall injuries due to lease agreement terms. The court is reviewing whether the motion should be treated as a motion for summary judgment.

Arizona Court of Appeals - Parental Rights Termination

The Arizona Court of Appeals vacated and remanded an order terminating parental rights for M.M. The court found that the Department of Child Safety did not offer reasonable reunification efforts to the father, who was incarcerated. The decision highlights the importance of adequate reunification services in parental rights cases.

Fadlon v. Cleverly - Arizona Court of Appeals

The Arizona Court of Appeals addressed whether a pre-decree ruling on the enforceability of a premarital agreement can be certified as final and immediately appealable. The court also considered the showing required to override a spousal maintenance waiver in a premarital agreement when it leads to public assistance eligibility.

State v. Thomas - Arizona Court of Appeals Non-Precedential Opinion

The Arizona Court of Appeals issued a non-precedential opinion in State v. Thomas, affirming the appellant's convictions and sentences for murder, armed robbery, and burglary. The court corrected the sentencing order regarding non-repetitive counts, excluded assessments, and adjusted presentence incarceration credit.

Champagne v. Bozer - Arizona Court of Appeals Non-Precedential Opinion

The Arizona Court of Appeals issued a non-precedential opinion in Champagne v. Bozer, affirming the removal of a co-trustee but reversing the denial of litigation expense reimbursement. The court found no abuse of discretion in removing the trustee but held that trust language allowed for reimbursement of expenses.

Commonwealth v. Pharrel P. - Juvenile Opinion

The Massachusetts Appeals Court issued a non-precedential memorandum and order affirming a juvenile's adjudication of delinquency for carrying a firearm without a license and carrying a loaded firearm. The juvenile was committed to the Department of Youth Services until age eighteen.

David Ladd v. Alina Bosch - Appeals Court Opinion

The Massachusetts Appeals Court issued a non-precedential opinion affirming judgments related to a construction dispute. The court affirmed the dismissal of claims under the New Hampshire Consumer Protection Act and upheld a jury verdict for abuse of process. The decision is primarily directed to the parties involved.

Papadopoulos v. Dunn - Massachusetts Appeals Court Non-Precedential Opinion

The Massachusetts Appeals Court issued a non-precedential opinion in Papadopoulos v. Dunn, affirming a lower court's judgment. The court found no evidence of causation presented by the plaintiff, thus upholding the dismissal of the case. This decision serves as persuasive authority but not binding precedent.

Robert X. Jenkins v. Shantal M. Jenkins - Massachusetts Appeals Court Opinion

The Massachusetts Appeals Court affirmed a judgment of contempt against Shantal M. Jenkins for failing to comply with a modification judgment regarding child support payments and providing proof of address. The court found her arguments regarding duress and lack of notification unpersuasive.

Commonwealth v. Dennis L. Coates, Jr. - Criminal Appeal

The Massachusetts Appeals Court issued a non-precedential memorandum and order in Commonwealth v. Dennis L. Coates, Jr. The court affirmed the defendant's conviction for assault and battery on a family or household member, finding that the prosecutor's closing argument did not improperly refer to facts not in evidence.

Latin America Crime Risk Trends 2025-2026

This notice analyzes political, economic, and financial crime risk trends in Latin America for 2025-2026. It highlights the impact of electoral cycles, US national security policies, and organized crime on financial institutions and corporate governance across the region.

High Court Re-Affirms 'One-Stop' Dispute Resolution in Arbitration Award Challenges

The English High Court has dismissed a challenge to an arbitral award, confirming an arbitrator's jurisdiction in a Section 67 challenge. The ruling reinforces the principle of 'one-stop' dispute resolution, particularly in settlement agreements, and clarifies the scope of an arbitrator's authority.

Importers' Path to Recover IEEPA Tariffs After Supreme Court Ruling

A recent article discusses the implications of a Supreme Court ruling invalidating tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). Importers must take affirmative legal action, such as filing suit in the U.S. Court of International Trade, to recover paid tariffs, as refunds are not automatic.

SEC Exempts Foreign Companies' D&Os from Insider Reporting

The SEC has issued an order exempting directors and officers (D&Os) of certain foreign private issuers (FPIs) from Section 16(a) insider reporting requirements. This exemption, effective March 18, 2026, applies to D&Os in qualifying jurisdictions like Canada, the EU, and the UK, relieving them of the obligation to report initial ownership and subsequent transactions within two business days.

SEC Exempts Foreign Private Issuer Directors/Officers from Section 16(a) Filings

The SEC has issued an order granting an exemption from Section 16(a) beneficial ownership reporting requirements for officers and directors of certain foreign private issuers (FPIs). This exemption applies to FPIs incorporated in qualifying jurisdictions with substantially similar disclosure regulations, such as Canada, the EEA, the UK, and others. The order aims to align with the Holding Foreign Insiders Accountable Act.

Court Orders Refund of Invalid Tariffs on IEEPA Goods

The U.S. Court of International Trade ordered U.S. Customs and Border Protection to refund invalid tariffs charged under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). This ruling provides nationwide relief for importers, though an appeal is expected.

US and Hong Kong Stablecoin and Crypto-Asset Regulation Analysis

This analysis compares the regulatory approaches to stablecoins and crypto-assets in the US and Hong Kong as of March 2026. It highlights the US's evolving fragmented approach, including the GENIUS Act, and Hong Kong's unified, purpose-built licensing framework. The document aims to guide market participants through these distinct regulatory landscapes.

UK PSR Seeks Merchant Survey Views on Interchange Fees

The UK Payment Systems Regulator (PSR) is seeking comments on a draft merchant survey questionnaire as part of its review of cross-border interchange fees. The survey aims to gather data on merchants' processing costs for online payments from the EEA to inform fee levels. The deadline for comments is March 5, 2026.

Regulation of AI in Drug Development: US, EU, and UK Approaches

Regulators in the US, EU, and UK are developing approaches to govern the use of AI in drug development, focusing on patient safety and research integrity. Key initiatives include common principles agreed upon by the EMA and FDA, and international harmonization efforts for AI/ML-enabled medical devices.

UK Cryptoasset Prudential Regime Proposals

The UK FCA has proposed a new prudential regime for cryptoasset firms, introducing capital, liquidity, risk management, and governance requirements. This consultation aims to ensure firms have sufficient financial resources and operational continuity. The regime is expected to come into force in October 2027.

Court of International Trade Orders Refunds for IEEPA Tariffs

The Court of International Trade (CIT) has ordered U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to issue refunds for tariffs collected under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). This decision follows a Supreme Court ruling invalidating these tariffs and applies to importers whose liquidations are not final.

SEC Grants Conditional Reporting Relief for Foreign Private Issuers

The SEC has issued an exemptive order providing conditional relief from Section 16(a) insider reporting requirements for certain foreign private issuers. This relief applies when insiders are subject to substantially similar reporting obligations in their home jurisdiction, aiming to avoid duplicative filings.

UK Employment Rights Act 2025 Reforms

The UK's Employment Rights Act 2025, passed on December 18, 2025, introduces significant reforms to employment law. These changes, phased in from 2026 to 2027, affect industrial action, family leave, statutory sick pay, and dismissal rights, with the establishment of a new Fair Work Agency.

EU Industrial Accelerator Act: Focus on Green and Procurement

The EU has published a proposal for its Industrial Accelerator Act, shifting focus from high-tech sectors to decarbonizing heavy industry and introducing 'Buy European' rules for public procurement. The Act aims to bolster EU industrial capacity and competitiveness, with significant implications for supply chains and international trade relations.

Court Orders Tariff Refunds for Importers

The U.S. Court of International Trade has ordered U.S. Customs and Border Protection to refund duties collected under the now-unlawful IEEPA tariffs. This decision follows a Supreme Court ruling and impacts importers nationwide, with specific actions required for refund eligibility.

Basel Committee Report on Synthetic Risk Transfer Markets

The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has published a report analyzing the growth of synthetic risk transfer (SRT) markets, which provide capital relief for banks managing corporate credit risk. The report identifies trends and supervisory concerns, estimating protected assets at approximately EUR 750 billion.

Net-Zero GHG Emissions News and Views

Baker Botts L.L.P. has published Edition 42 of their 'P2N0 - News and Views on the Drive Towards Net-Zero GHG Emissions' newsletter. This edition, dated March 6, 2026, provides updates and insights on the global efforts to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions.

Supreme Court Strikes Down IEEPA Tariffs; Trade Court Orders Refund Path

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) by the Trump administration were unlawful. Following this decision, the Court of International Trade has ordered a process for importers to seek refunds of these invalidated tariffs.

Colorado Bankruptcy Court Denies Law Firm Employment Application

The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado denied an application by the Johnson Law Firm to be employed as attorneys for the Chapter 7 Trustee. The denial was based on the firm's requested contingent fee agreement, which the court found inappropriate for this case.

Jones v. City of North Las Vegas - Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed an amended opinion in Jones v. City of North Las Vegas, concerning a Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment violation. The court reversed in part and affirmed in part the district court's summary judgment, impacting qualified immunity for officers involved in a search and shooting incident.

Renteria v. Grieg Star AS - Maritime Worker Negligence Appeal

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's grant of summary judgment for Grieg Star AS in a maritime worker's vessel negligence appeal. Balvina Renteria, an injured longshore worker, alleged negligence under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act.

Crawford Methodist Church v. Alabama-West Florida Conference - Opinion

The Supreme Court of Alabama has issued an opinion in the case of Crawford Methodist Church v. Alabama-West Florida Conference of the United Methodist Church, Inc. The opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Southern Reporter.

Smith et al. v. ARC Realty et al. - Supreme Court Opinion

The Supreme Court of Alabama has issued an opinion in the case of Brian Smith et al. v. ARC Realty et al. The case involves claims of fraud, breach of contract, and conspiracy related to property development around Lake Martin. The opinion is subject to formal revision before publication.

Supreme Court of Alabama Opinion on Church Dispute

The Supreme Court of Alabama issued an opinion regarding a dispute involving church property and governance. The case, docketed as SC-2025-0462, addresses petitions for writs of mandamus related to multiple church entities and the Alabama-West Florida Conference of the United Methodist Church.

In re Mt. Zion v. Alabama-West Florida Conference - Petition for Writ of Mandamus

The Supreme Court of Alabama has issued a notice regarding multiple petitions for writs of mandamus filed by the Alabama-West Florida Conference of the United Methodist Church, Inc. and its Board of Trustees. These petitions are related to various underlying circuit court cases concerning church property and governance.

Supreme Court of Alabama Opinion on Church Dispute

The Supreme Court of Alabama issued a legal opinion regarding a dispute involving the Daleville First Methodist Church and the Alabama-West Florida Conference of the United Methodist Church. The opinion addresses multiple related cases filed under various docket numbers.

Armstrong Methodist Church v. Alabama-West Florida Conference - Mandamus Petition

The Supreme Court of Alabama has issued an opinion related to petitions for writs of mandamus filed by the Alabama-West Florida Conference of the United Methodist Church, Inc. The case involves disputes concerning church property and governance. The opinion is subject to formal revision before publication.

Supreme Court of Alabama Opinion on ARC Realty Case

The Supreme Court of Alabama issued an opinion regarding a case involving ARC Realty, LLC and Brian Smith. The opinion addresses a petition for a writ of mandamus related to a dispute over property development around Lake Martin. The case involves claims of fraud, breach of contract, and conspiracy.

Estate of Milner v. Community Health Systems - Wrongful Death Mandamus

The Supreme Court of Alabama is considering a petition for writ of mandamus in a wrongful-death action. The plaintiff initially named the incorrect defendant and failed to substitute the proper party within the statute of limitations. The court will determine if the plaintiff's amended complaint relates back to the original filing date.

Supreme Court of Alabama Opinion on Church Dispute

The Supreme Court of Alabama issued a legal opinion regarding a dispute involving the Sunflower United Methodist Church, Inc. and the Alabama-West Florida Conference of the United Methodist Church, Inc. The opinion addresses multiple related petitions for writs of mandamus.

Supreme Court of Alabama Opinion on Church Dispute

The Supreme Court of Alabama issued an opinion regarding a dispute involving the Alabama-West Florida Conference of the United Methodist Church. The case, docketed as SC-2025-0851, addresses a petition for a writ of mandamus related to church property and governance.

Supreme Court of Alabama Opinion on Church Dispute

The Supreme Court of Alabama issued an opinion regarding a dispute involving the Alabama-West Florida Conference of the United Methodist Church, Inc. The case, docketed as SC-2025-0514, concerns property and governance issues within the church. The opinion is subject to formal revision before publication.

Baggett Chapel Church v. Alabama-West Florida Conference - Writ of Mandamus

The Supreme Court of Alabama has issued a legal opinion regarding the case In re: Baggett Chapel United Methodist Church v. Alabama-West Florida Conference. The opinion, filed on March 6, 2026, addresses a Petition for Writ of Mandamus related to property disputes involving local churches and the conference. This ruling will impact the governance and property rights of United Methodist churches within the conference.

Supreme Court of Alabama Opinion on Trinity United Methodist Church Case

The Supreme Court of Alabama issued an opinion regarding a dispute involving Trinity United Methodist Church and its conference. The case concerns property and governance issues within the church structure. Multiple related appeals are consolidated under docket number SC-2025-0543.

Supreme Court of Alabama Opinion on Church Dispute

The Supreme Court of Alabama issued an opinion regarding a dispute involving church property and governance. The case, In re: Ham Chapel Methodist Church v. Alabama-West Florida Conference of the United Methodist Church, Inc., addresses multiple related petitions for writs of mandamus filed by the Alabama-West Florida Conference.

Bureau of Reclamation Seeks Proposals for Aerial LiDAR Snow Surveys

The Bureau of Reclamation is seeking proposals for aerial LiDAR snow surveys to improve water supply forecasts under its Snow Water Supply Forecasting Program. Eligible applicants include various government, nonprofit, educational, and business entities. Proposals must focus on LiDAR deployment within the Reclamation's 17-state domain and quantify benefits to water management.

Children's Mental Health Initiative Grant Opportunity

The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) has announced the Children's Mental Health Initiative grant opportunity, offering up to $43,353,763 to eligible state governments, tribal organizations, and governmental units for community mental health services for youth with serious emotional disturbances. Applications are due April 20, 2026.

Grant for Implementing Zero Suicide in Health Systems

The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) has announced a grant opportunity to fund the implementation of the Zero Suicide framework in health systems. The grant aims to provide resources for suicide prevention among adults at risk, with a total award pool of $16,110,545.

HUD Solicits Applications for Housing Hazard and Lead-Based Paint Capital Fund Program

The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is soliciting applications for its Housing-Related Hazards (HRH) and Lead-Based Paint (LBP) Capital Fund Program. Approximately $65 million is available for competitive grants to public housing agencies to evaluate and reduce residential health hazards, with at least $25 million specifically for lead-based paint hazard reduction.

NIH Funding for Collaborative Research Facilities Development

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has issued a Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) for the development of collaborative research facilities. The notice supports the Biomedical Research Facilities (BRF) and HIV/AIDS Research Facilities (HRF) programs, with a total award ceiling of $88,000,000.

Assisted Outpatient Treatment Program Grant Opportunity

The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) has announced a grant opportunity for the Assisted Outpatient Treatment (AOT) Program. The program aims to facilitate the implementation of AOT for adults with serious mental illness, with a total award pool of $10,000,000. Applications are due by April 20, 2026.

NEA Seeks Organization for 2027 Jazz Masters Tribute Concert

The National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) is seeking an organization to coordinate the 2027 NEA Jazz Masters Tribute Concert and related events. Eligible applicants include various nonprofit, governmental, and educational entities. The application deadline is April 9, 2026.

Supreme Court of Louisiana - Land Use Permit Review

The Supreme Court of Louisiana vacated and rendered a lower court's decision regarding the interpretation of a land use plan for St. James Parish. The ruling clarifies the scope of judicial review for local government land use decisions, emphasizing appropriate discretion for the Parish.

Michael B. Reis, Jr. v. Mandy Pohlmann Reis - Divorce and Property Classification

The Supreme Court of Louisiana reversed and remanded a lower court decision regarding the classification of a business entity formed during a marriage. The court found that Outkast Environmental, LLC, created after the termination of the community property regime, should not be classified as community property.

Succession of Laurie Maria Brocato - Louisiana Supreme Court Ruling

The Louisiana Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's decision regarding the validity of an olographic testament in the Succession of Laurie Maria Brocato. The court found a four-page document, written in a notebook and signed by the testator, met the form requirements for an olographic testament under La. C.C. art. 1575.

Louisiana v. Turner - Criminal Case Opinion

The Supreme Court of Louisiana reversed and remanded the case of State v. Jarvis Turner. The court addressed whether a defense counsel preventing a defendant from testifying constitutes structural error requiring automatic reversal, distinguishing between direct and collateral review.

Louisiana v. Christopher Cloudie - Supreme Court Opinion Reversed

The Supreme Court of Louisiana reversed a lower court's ruling that permitted an expert witness to provide a diagnosis of child sexual abuse at trial. The case, State of Louisiana v. Christopher Cloudie, involved charges of first-degree rape and aggravated crime against nature.

Bryan v. Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Corporation - Insurance Claim Dispute

The Supreme Court of Louisiana issued an opinion in Bryan v. Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Corporation, addressing the prescriptive period for claims against the Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Association (LIGA). The court affirmed and remanded the case, clarifying the application of statutory deadlines and interruption of prescription for first-party property insurance claims.

Plaquemines Port v. Tuan Nguyen - Expropriation for Private Lease

The Louisiana Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's decision in Plaquemines Port Harbor & Terminal District v. Tuan Nguyen, ruling that a public port authority cannot expropriate private property for the sole purpose of leasing it to a private company for exclusive development. The court found such a taking does not serve a public purpose under the Louisiana Constitution.

Judge Sheva Sims Suspension - Louisiana Supreme Court

The Louisiana Supreme Court has imposed a nine-month suspension without pay on Judge Sheva Sims, reducing the Judiciary Commission's recommendation of a one-year suspension. The disciplinary action stems from multiple violations of the Code of Judicial Conduct and the Louisiana Constitution.

Esplanade Mall Realty Holdings, LLC v. Joseph P. Lopinto III - Tax Lien Case

The Louisiana Supreme Court reversed and remanded the case of Esplanade Mall Realty Holdings, LLC v. Joseph P. Lopinto III. The court held that ad valorem taxes, interest, and costs are statutory impositions under the law and remanded to the trial court to calculate the redemption price.

State of Louisiana v. Michael Steven White - Convictions Reversed

The Supreme Court of Louisiana reversed the convictions and vacated the sentences of Michael Steven White in docket number 2024-K-00761. The case was remanded for further proceedings. The decision addresses an issue concerning the completeness of verdict forms provided to juries.

Ike Spears v. William W. Hall - Louisiana Supreme Court Ruling

The Supreme Court of Louisiana reversed a lower court judgment in Ike Spears v. William W. Hall. The court held that the Rules of Professional Conduct apply to attorneys who form joint ventures to provide legal services, regardless of the nomenclature used to describe their relationship.

Davidson v. Hardy - Paternity Case

The Supreme Court of Louisiana affirmed a lower court's ruling in Sarah Allen Davidson v. Terrance Hardy. The court found that Louisiana Civil Code article 198, as applied, unconstitutionally limits a biological father's interest in parenting his child and violates due process rights. The ruling impacts paternity establishment and custody rights.

Doe v. Salesforce, Inc. - Civil Case Filing

A civil case, Doe v. Salesforce, Inc., was filed on March 6, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, bearing number 3:26-cv-01975, involves a complaint for damages and a request to proceed by pseudonym.

Wallace v. Wallace Supreme Court of Alabama opinion March 6

Wallace v. Wallace Supreme Court of Alabama opinion March 6

Supreme Court of Alabama - Church Dispute Opinion

The Supreme Court of Alabama issued a legal opinion in the case of In re United Methodist Church Westview Heights, Inc. v. Alabama-West Florida Conference of the United Methodist Church, Inc. The opinion, docketed as SC-2025-0431, addresses a dispute involving church entities.

Supreme Court of Alabama Opinion on Church Property Dispute

The Supreme Court of Alabama issued an opinion regarding a property dispute involving Gold Hill Methodist Church and the Alabama-West Florida Conference of the United Methodist Church. The case involves multiple circuit court dockets and petitions for writs of mandamus.

Supreme Court of Alabama Opinion on Church Dispute

The Supreme Court of Alabama has issued an opinion regarding a dispute involving the Coffeeville Methodist Church and the Alabama-West Florida Conference of the United Methodist Church, Inc. The case, docketed as SC-2025-0361, addresses a petition for a writ of mandamus.

Alabama Supreme Court Ruling on Elba United Methodist Church Case

The Alabama Supreme Court issued a ruling concerning the Elba United Methodist Church case, identified by docket number SC-2025-0445. The opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Southern Reporter.

Lukas Goodyear v. Delta Air Lines - Overtime Pay Class Action

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia granted Delta Air Lines' motion for summary judgment in an overtime pay class action filed by employee Lukas Goodyear. The court denied the plaintiff's motions to exclude evidence and certify the class, ruling that Delta, as an air carrier, is exempt from FLSA overtime requirements.

Court Order Restoring Disaster Mitigation Funding

Massachusetts AG Andrea Joy Campbell and 23 states secured a court order requiring FEMA to restore billions in disaster mitigation funding. The order compels FEMA to reverse the termination of the Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) program, which had been previously declared unlawful.

State AG Secures $422,093 Settlement for Restaurant Service Charge Violations

Ten State Attorneys General have secured a $422,093 settlement with two Massachusetts restaurants, Jackeens, Inc. d/b/a Carrie Nation and Inishowen, Inc. d/b/a The Dubliner. The settlement resolves allegations that the restaurants failed to distribute a 3% service charge to 84 employees between May 2023 and June 2024.

AG Secures Guilty Plea for Stealing Over $220,000 from Rest Home

The Massachusetts Attorney General's Office announced a guilty plea from Luzia Wade for stealing over $220,000 from a Worcester rest home and its elderly residents. Wade was sentenced to a suspended jail term and ordered to pay restitution and cease working with the elderly.