People v Grandberry - Criminal Appeal

This document provides details for the criminal appeal case People v Grandberry, docket number B338353. The case involves an appeal filed by the defendant against a lower court's decision. Further details on the specific charges and proceedings are available through the provided URL.

Starr v Starr - Family Law Appeal

The California Court of Appeal issued an opinion in the case of Starr v Starr (A172153). The court addressed issues related to child custody and visitation, affirming in part and reversing in part the lower court's decisions. This opinion provides guidance on the application of family law statutes in complex custody disputes.

Los Angeles Police Protective League v. City of Los Angeles

This document concerns the court case LOS ANGELES POLICE PROTECTIVE LEAGUE v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, case number S275272. It is a filing within the California court system.

North Carolina man sentenced 40 months prison civil rights violation

North Carolina man sentenced 40 months prison civil rights violation

Defendant sentenced 47 months for smuggling humans and drugs

Defendant sentenced 47 months for smuggling humans and drugs

Maryland man indicted on classified defense information charges

Maryland man indicted on classified defense information charges

Nursing assistant convicted in $11.4M health care fraud scheme

Nursing assistant convicted in $11.4M health care fraud scheme

Yeh v Barrington Pacific - Civil Litigation

This document pertains to the civil litigation case Yeh v Barrington Pacific, identified by case number B337904. The filing represents a new entry or update within the court's docket for this specific legal dispute.

DCFS v. S.P. et al. - Child Welfare Case

This document pertains to Case B348279, "DCFS v. S.P. et al.", designated as a "Fast Track" case. The filing is from the California Courts system, indicating a specific legal proceeding is underway.

N.D. v. Superior Court - Appellate Case

This document concerns the appellate court case N.D. v. Superior Court. The filing represents a new case being processed through the appellate court system. Further details on the specific nature of the appeal are not provided in the summary information.

Barrios v Chraghchian - Case Details

This document provides case details for Barrios v Chraghchian from the 2nd District Court. It pertains to a specific case within the appellate court system. No new regulations or enforcement actions are detailed.

Domestic Violence Restraining Order Appeal Reversed

The California Court of Appeal reversed a lower court's decision regarding a domestic violence restraining order. The appellate court found that the trial court erred in its application of the law, leading to the reversal of the original order.

Towns v Hyundai Motor America - Court Opinion Modification

A California court has modified its prior opinion in the case of Towns v. Hyundai Motor America. This modification pertains to the court's ruling and does not introduce new regulatory requirements or penalties.

Harmon v. Super. Ct. - Criminal Procedure

The California Court of Appeal for the Fourth District issued an opinion in Harmon v. Super. Ct. This case concerns the application of Penal Code section 1538.5 regarding the suppression of evidence obtained through search warrants. The court's decision clarifies procedural aspects of such motions.

Bankruptcy Case - Legal Malpractice and Rooker-Feldman Doctrine

This document details a bankruptcy case concerning legal malpractice and the application of the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. The court's decision addresses the specific legal arguments presented by the parties involved in the bankruptcy proceedings.

Guevara-Serrano v. Garland - Asylum Case

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion in the asylum case of Guevara-Serrano v. Garland, docket number 23-4420. The court's decision likely clarifies or modifies aspects of asylum law as applied in this specific case.

Motil litigation release 26462, final judgment, $2.9M, $340K, $5M

Motil litigation release 26462, final judgment, $2.9M, $340K, $5M

People v Superior Court Riverside County - Criminal Procedure

The California Court of Appeal issued an opinion in the case of People v. Superior Court Riverside County (E086512). This ruling addresses procedural matters within the California criminal justice system.

Randolph v. California State University - Employment Discrimination

This document details the employment discrimination case of Randolph v. California State University. The court's decision addresses specific legal arguments and findings related to the employment dispute.

Homeownership v City of La Habra - Court Opinion

This document is a court opinion regarding the case Homeownership v. City of La Habra. The opinion addresses legal arguments and findings related to property and municipal law within California.

Towns v Hyundai - Court Opinion Modification

The California Court of Appeal issued a modification order for its prior opinion in the case of Towns v. Hyundai. This order amends specific portions of the original ruling. The modification pertains to a legal dispute previously adjudicated by the court.

People v Rodriguez - Criminal Opinion

The California Second District Court of Appeal has issued an opinion in the case of People v. Rodriguez (B333692). This document represents a judicial decision on a criminal matter.

People v Craig - Criminal Appeal

The California Court of Appeal has made an opinion available for the criminal case People v Craig, docket number B343556. This update provides access to the court's decision in this appellate matter.

Gilroy v SC - Supreme Court Opinion

The Supreme Court has issued an opinion in case S282937, Gilroy v SC. This filing represents the court's final decision on the matter. The specific details of the ruling and its implications are contained within the opinion document.

Berkeley People's Alliance v City of Berkeley - Case Details

This document provides case details for Berkeley People's Alliance v City of Berkeley. It is a court filing that updates the status or details of an ongoing legal matter between the parties.

SEC charges Sumit Rai, others; $10.6 million misappropriated

SEC charges Sumit Rai, others; $10.6 million misappropriated

Carroll v. City and County of S.F. - Court Opinion

This document is a court opinion in the case of Carroll v. City and County of S.F. The opinion addresses legal arguments and findings related to the case. Specific details regarding the court's ruling and its implications are contained within the full text of the opinion.

Vallejo v American Canyon - Court Opinion

The California Courts of Appeal have issued a published opinion in the case of Vallejo v American Canyon. This document details the court's decision and reasoning in this specific legal matter.

Merchant of Tennis v. Super. Ct. - Civil Procedure

The California Court of Appeal published an opinion in Merchant of Tennis v. Super. Ct. on January 14, 2026. The case concerns a procedural issue, likely related to discovery or evidence, as indicated by the court's review of a superior court decision.

Merchant of Tennis v Superior Court - Civil Litigation

This document pertains to the court case Merchant of Tennis v Superior Court, identified by case number E085766. It represents a filing within the ongoing legal proceedings.

Microsoft v Superior Court - Civil Litigation

The California Court of Appeal issued an opinion in the case of Microsoft v. Superior Court. This ruling addresses issues related to civil litigation procedures, specifically concerning discovery disputes.

Carroll v City San Francisco - Civil Litigation

This document is a court opinion in the case of Carroll v. City of San Francisco, identified by docket number A169408M. The opinion addresses legal arguments and decisions made by the court regarding the case.

Merchant of Tennis v Superior Court - Opinion

The California Court of Appeal has issued an opinion in the case of Merchant of Tennis v. Superior Court, identified by docket number E085766. This document represents a judicial decision on a legal matter.

City of Vallejo v. American Canyon - Court Opinion

This document is a court opinion regarding the case City of Vallejo v. American Canyon. The opinion details the court's decision and reasoning in this specific legal matter. It does not introduce new regulations or enforcement actions but rather interprets existing law.

Microsoft Corp. v. Super. Ct. - Opinion

The California Court of Appeal published an opinion in the case of Microsoft Corp. v. Super. Ct. The opinion addresses legal arguments related to the case, with the publication date serving as the effective date for this court document.

Vallejo v American Canyon - Civil Litigation Opinion

The Third District Court of Appeal of California has issued an opinion in the case of Vallejo v American Canyon. This opinion addresses civil litigation matters and is part of the ongoing judicial process.

Microsoft Corp. v. Superior Court - Case B347381

This document pertains to the court case Microsoft Corp. v. Superior Court, identified by case number B347381. The filing represents a standard procedural step within the ongoing legal proceedings.

Carroll v. City and County of San Francisco - Case A169408

This document pertains to the court case Carroll v. City and County of San Francisco, identified by case number A169408. It represents a filing or update within the ongoing legal proceedings.

People v Washington - Division 1 Opinion

The California Court of Appeal, Division 1, has issued an opinion in the case of People v Washington (Case B337590). This document represents a judicial decision on a legal matter.

Tuufuli v. West Coast Dental Services - Case B338584

This document pertains to Case B338584, involving a legal dispute between Tuufuli and West Coast Dental Services. The case is being processed through the US court system. Further details on the nature of the dispute or any resolutions are not provided in this summary.

Court Modification to Opinion

A court has ordered a modification to an opinion that was originally filed on December 16, 2025. This action pertains to the judicial process and amends a previously issued legal decision.

People v McCowan - Oral Argument Scheduled

The California Court of Appeal has scheduled an oral argument for case A167545, People v McCowan, in January 2026. This case involves an unspecified criminal matter proceeding through the appellate court system.

Gomez v. US - Criminal Conviction Affirmed

The Ninth Circuit affirmed a methamphetamine conviction for Gomez, finding that the district court properly applied a violence enhancement to his sentence. The court reviewed the evidence supporting the enhancement and found it sufficient.

P v Jimenez - Court Opinion

The California Courts of Appeal published an opinion in the case of P v Jimenez on January 12, 2026. This document represents a judicial decision on a legal matter, establishing precedent or clarifying existing law.

SEC dismisses action against Guy Robert Elliott

SEC dismisses action against Guy Robert Elliott

US v. Rodriguez - Sentencing Enhancement

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals addressed sentencing enhancements for career offenders in a methamphetamine and fentanyl case. The court clarified the application of career-offender provisions, impacting how certain drug offenses are penalized.

Barbanell v. Lodge - Case D084193

This document details Case D084193, Barbanell versus Lodge, filed in a US court. The filing represents a new entry in the court's docket, initiating or continuing a legal proceeding. Further details on the nature of the case are available through the provided URL.

Chong v. Mardirossian Akaragian LLP - Case B341157

This document concerns Case B341157, a legal proceeding titled Chong versus Mardirossian Akaragian LLP, filed within the US court system. The filing appears to be a standard procedural step in an ongoing legal matter.

People v. Cagle - Criminal Appeal

This document details Case A171799, People versus Cagle, within the US court system. It represents a filing or update related to an ongoing criminal appeal.

USA v Ruiz - Criminal Conviction Affirmed

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of USA v Ruiz, upholding a 33-month imprisonment sentence. This decision finalizes the appellate review of the criminal case.