Joseph Tharakan v. State of Karnataka - Writ Petition
Summary
The Karnataka High Court has issued a writ petition in the case of Mr P G Joseph Tharakan vs State of Karnataka. The petition, filed under WP No. 2168 of 2026, involves multiple respondents including state and federal agencies, as well as international bodies like Interpol and Dubai Police.
What changed
This document is a writ petition filed in the Karnataka High Court concerning Mr P G Joseph Tharakan against the State of Karnataka and several other respondents, including the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Interpol, and Dubai Police. The case, identified as WP No. 2168 of 2026, was heard by Justice S.R. Krishna Kumar on March 23, 2026. The petitioner's addresses indicate international residency, suggesting potential cross-border legal issues.
As this is a court filing, the immediate implication for compliance officers is to note the existence of this legal proceeding. While no specific compliance actions are mandated by this document itself, legal departments should monitor the case for any developments that might impact the involved entities or set precedents. The broad range of respondents, including international law enforcement agencies, suggests a complex case that may have implications beyond national borders.
Archived snapshot
Mar 26, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
## Unlock Advanced Research with PRISM AI
Integrated with over 4 crore judgments and laws — designed for legal practitioners, researchers, students and institutions
- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc -... Upgrade to Premium [Cites 4, Cited by 0 ] ### Karnataka High Court
Mr P G Joseph Tharakan vs State Of Karnataka on 23 March, 2026
Author: S.R.Krishna Kumar
Bench: S.R.Krishna Kumar
-1-
NC: 2026:KHC:16205
WP No. 2168 of 2026
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO. 2168 OF 2026 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
MR P G JOSEPH THARAKAN
S/O. LATE GEORGE THARAKAN,
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
RESIDING AS PER CHARGESHEET AT
'JAREIN MANSION', AQUEM,
MARGAO, GOA - 403601.
RESIDING AS PER CHARGESHEET ALSO AT
YURI GAGARIN STREET, NO. 117/40,
NEW BELGRADE, SERBIA.
ACTUALLY RESIDING AT
SHEIKHA LATIFA BUILDING,
FLAT NO. 210, BANIYAS ROAD,
DEIRA, DUBAI, U.A.E.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.K.SAMPATH KUMAR, SENIOR COUNSEL APPEARING FOR
SRI. SURAJ SAMPATH , ADVOCATE)
Digitally AND:
signed by
CHANDANA
BM 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
Location: REPRESENTED BY
High Court of THE HULIMAVU POLICE STATION,
Karnataka REPRESENTED BY THE S.P.P.,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
AMBEDKAR VEEDI,
BANGALORE - 560 001.
2. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (CBI),
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (NCB),
INTERNATIONAL POLICE COOPERATION UNIT ([IPC](https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1569253/) U),
PLOT NO. 5-B, 6TH FLOOR, A-WING,
CGO COMPLEX,
NEW DELHI-110 003.
-2-
NC: 2026:KHC:16205
WP No. 2168 of 2026
HC-KAR
MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL,
PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS,
DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND TRAINING
MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, P.G. A PENSIONS,
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NORTH BLOCK,
NEW DELHI - 110 001.INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL POLICE ORGANIZATION
(INTERPOL), GENERAL SECRETARIAT,
200, QUAI CHARLES DE GAULLE,
69006, LYON FRANCE.THE UNION OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF EXTENAL AFFAIRS
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
PATTLA HOUSE ANNEXE, TILAKMARG
NEWDELHI - 110 001.DUBAI POLICE
UNITED ARAB EMIRATES,
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMANDER-IN-
CHIEF OF DUBAI POLICE
DUBAI POLICE GENERAL HEADQUARTERS
AI TIWAR1, DEIRA, DUBAI, DUBAI MUNICIPALITY
UNITED ARAB EMIRATESMINISTRY OF INTERIOR
UNITED ARAB EMIRATES
REPRESENTED BY ITS MINISTER
ZAYED SPORT CITY, ARAB GULF STREET
NEAR TO SHAIKH ZAYED MOSQUE
ABU DHABI, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES.MR. R. JAYVELU
S/O MR. RAMAMURTHY
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS.
R/AT NO. 501/A4, 9TH MILE STONE
HULIMAVU
BENGALURU - 560 012.
(AMENDMENT CARRIED OUT
AS PER ORDER DATED: 13.03.2026)
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. M.R.PATIL, HCGP FOR R-1
SRI. P. PRASANNA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-2
SRI. C.V.NAGESH, SENIOR COUNSEL APPEARING FOR
SRI. DARSHAN.R, ADVOCATE FOR R-8
SRI. H. MALLAN GOUD, CGSC FOR R-3 & R-5)
-3-
NC: 2026:KHC:16205
WP No. 2168 of 2026
HC-KAR
THIS W.P IS FILED UNDER [ARTICLES 226](https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1712542/) AND [227](https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1331149/) OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W SECTION 528 OF BNSS PRAYING TO
QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 09.09.2024 IN C.C. NO.
15645/2024 (ANNEXURE -A) PASSED BY THE HON'BLE III ADDITIONAL
CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE AT BANGALORE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
ORAL ORDER In this petition, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs:
" i) Issue & Writ of Certiorari or any other
appropriate wit, order or direction quashing the impugned
Order dated 09.09.2024 in C.C. No. 15645/2024 (Annexure
A) passed by the Hon'ble 111 Additional Chief Judicial
Magistrate at Bangalore.ii) Consequently, issue a Writ of Mandamus or
any other appropriate order or direction directing the 2nd
Respondent to request the 4th Respondent to immediately
cancel the Red Corner Notice issued against the Petitioner
(Annexure L) or alternatively, direct the 4thRespondent to
immediately cancel the Red Corner Notice issued against
the Petitioner (Annexure L).iii) Declare that the subordinate Courts in the State of
Karnataka, Including the Hon'ble III Additional Chief
Judicial Magistrate at Bangalore, have no power to issue
INTERPOL Notices and/or directions to the 4th
Respondent.
-4- NC: 2026:KHC:16205 WP No. 2168 of 2026 HC-KAR
iv) Lay down guidelines for the 1 Respondent Police
if it wants to raise a request in future for an INTERPOL
Red Corner Notice through the 2nd Respondent.
v) Direct payment of just and suitable compensation
and costs, jointly and severally by the Respondents to the
Petitioner.
vi) Grant such other reliefs as this Hon'ble Court
deems fit considering the facts and circumstances of the
case, in order to meet the e justice."
- Heard learned Senior counsel for the petitioner,
learned HCGP for respondent No.1, learned counsel for
respondent No.2, learned CGSC for respondent Nos.3 and 5 and
learned Senior counsel for respondent No.8 and perused the
material on record.
- Learned Senior counsel for the petitioner would
reiterate the various contentions urged in the petition and referred
to the material on record in order to contend that the impugned
order at Annexure-A dated 09.09.2024 passed by the Trial Court
directing issuance of red corner notice against petitioner-accused
No.2 is illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction or authority of law
especially, in the absence of any statutory provision, rules or
regulations in the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) or -5- NC: 2026:KHC:16205 WP No. 2168 of 2026 HC-KAR
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), which
empowers, enables or authorises the learned Magistrate to issue
such a red corner notice which deserves to be quashed. It is also
submitted that the impugned order directing issuance of the
consequent open dated warrant in English format as against the
petitioner - accused No.2 also consequently deserves to be
quashed.
- Per contra, learned Senior Counsel for respondent
No.8 as well as learned counsel for the remaining respondents
would jointly submit that there is no merit in the petition and the
same is liable to be dismissed.
- As rightly contended by the learned Senior counsel for
the petitioner, there is no provision in the Cr.P.C or BNSS, 2023 or
any other statutory provision, rules or regulations, which enabled,
empowered or authorised the learned Magistrate to pass the
impugned order directing issuance of the red corner notice as
against the petitioner as directed in the impugned order which is
clearly illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction or authority of law
and as such, the impugned order and red corner notice deserve to -6- NC: 2026:KHC:16205 WP No. 2168 of 2026 HC-KAR
be quashed to the said extent. So also, the consequent open dated
warrant in English format issued as against the petitioner on the
basis of the impugned red corner notice also deserves to be
quashed subject to certain directions to be issued to the petitioner
and respondents.
- At this stage, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner
submits that the remaining prayer sought for in the petition would
not be pressed for the present and his submission is placed on
record.
- In the result, I pass the following:
ORDER
(i) The petition is partly allowed.
(ii) The impugned order dated 09.09.2024 insofar as it
relates to issuance of red corner notice against the petitioner-
accused No.2, passed in C.C.No.15645/2024 by the III Additional
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bengaluru is hereby quashed.
(iii) Consequently, the impugned order insofar as it relates
to issuing open dated warrant at Annexure-L as against the
petitioner-accused No.2 is also hereby quashed, subject to the
petitioner appearing before the Trial Court in C.C.No.15645/2024
on 27.04.2026.
-7-
NC: 2026:KHC:16205 WP No. 2168 of 2026 HC-KAR
(iv) Respondent No.2 - the Central Bureau of Investigation
(CBI) is directed to inform respondent No.4 - International Criminal
Police Organization (INTERPOL) about the present order to give
effect to and implement the same as well as to enable compliance
of this order and to ensure that the petitioner appears before the
Trial Court on 27.04.2026 as stated supra.
(v) Similarly, respondent No.3 - Ministry of Personnel,
Public Grievances and Pensions and respondent No.5- the Union
of India, Ministry of External Affairs is directed to inform/intimate
respondent Nos.6 and 7 - the Dubai Police and Ministry and
authorities at Dubai, United Arab Emirates, about the present order
to give effect to and implement the same as well as to enable
compliance of this order and to ensure that the petitioner appears
before the Trial Court on 27.04.2026 as stated supra.
Hand delivery of this order is permitted.
Sd/-
(S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR)
JUDGE
BMC
List No.: 2 Sl No.: 0
Related changes
Get daily alerts for India Karnataka High Court
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from GP.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when India Karnataka High Court publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.