Alonzo Criss et al. v. Tony Evers et al. - Civil Rights Complaint Dismissed

Jump To

Top Caption Trial Court Document

Support FLP

CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.

Please become a member today.

Join Free.law Now

April 15, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note

Alonzo Criss, Mary Criss, and Alissa Hoag v. Tony Evers, Jenna Gill, Morgan Johanning, and Corinne Frutiger

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

• Citations: None known
• Docket Number: 3:25-cv-00825

• Precedential Status: Unknown Status

• Opinion

• Authorities (6)

• Cited By (0)

• Summaries (0)

• Similar Cases (2.5K)

• PDF

Trial Court Document

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

ALONZO CRISS, MARY CRISS, and ALISSA HOAG,

Plaintiffs,
v. OPINION and ORDER

TONY EVERS, JENNA GILL, 25-cv-825-jdp
MORGAN JOHANNING, and CORINNE FRUTIGER,

Defendants.

Plaintiff Alonzo Criss, proceeding without counsel, was detained at the Iowa County
jail at the time of filing this complaint. Criss’s complaint is before the court for screening.
I must dismiss any portion of his complaint that is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim
for relief, or asks for money damages from a defendant who by law cannot be sued for money
damages. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915 (e)(2)(B), 1915A(b). I must accept the factual allegations in
his complaint as true and interpret his complaint generously, holding it to a less stringent
standard than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers. Arnett v. Webster, 658 F.3d 742,
751 (7th Cir. 2011). Mary Criss and Alissa Hoag are also identified as plaintiffs, but the
complaint concerns only what happened to Alonzo Criss, so I will dismiss them.
Criss filed this case in October 2025, and the allegations in his complaint involve his
then-ongoing state court criminal proceedings. Online state court records show that Criss has
now been convicted of possession with intent to deliver/distribute controlled substances on or
near a park, maintaining a drug trafficking place, and neglecting a child. Lafayette County Case
No. 2025CF35. So, it isn’t clear whether there is still a live controversy here.
In any event, Criss’s complaint fails to state a claim for relief. Criss attempts to sue
three individuals: his attorney, Adam Witt; an assistant district attorney, Corinne Frutiger; and
the judge in his state court criminal case, Jenna Gill. Criss’s complaint doesn’t include any
allegations against defendants Tony Evers and Morgan Johanning, so I will dismiss them.
Criss alleges that Witt violated his rights by poorly representing him and by taking
advantage of his disability. See Dkt. 1, at 4. I understand Criss to be alleging that Witt

committed legal malpractice. A criminal defendant who sues his defense attorney for legal
malpractice must allege that he did not commit the crime of which he was convicted.
Skindzelewski v. Smith, 2020 WI 57, ¶ 2, 392 Wis. 2d 117, 944 N.W.2d 575. Criss pleaded no
contest to the criminal charges, so he cannot prove that he is innocent of the underlying crimes
of which he was convicted. See Galston v. Castonia, No. 2019AP1621, 2021 WL 8567031,
at *1–2 (Wis. Ct. App. May 19, 2021) (summary disposition order).
Criss alleges that Frutiger brought false charges against Criss and falsely accused him of
being a danger to his children. See Dkt. 1, at 5–6. But Criss cannot state a claim against Frutiger

based on these allegations because Frutiger is an assistant district attorney entitled to absolute
immunity for prosecutorial functions “intimately associated with the judicial phase of the
criminal process,” including determining whether charges should be brought. Lewis v. Mills, 677 F.3d 324, 330 (7th Cir. 2012) (citation omitted).
Criss alleges that Judge Gill told his attorney that Criss doesn’t deserve a fair trial and
told the district attorney that Criss should be put in prison. Dkt. 1, at 7. Criss also alleges that
Gill prevented him from speaking in court and prevented him from firing his lawyer. Id. Criss
cannot state a claim against Gill because she is a state court judge, and judges are immune from

liability for acts taken in their judicial capacity. Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 11 (1991).
I will dismiss the case in its entirety for Criss’s failure to state a claim upon which relief
may be granted. When, as here, a plaintiff proceeds without counsel, the court of appeals has
cautioned against dismissing his case without giving him a chance to amend the complaint.
Felton v. City of Chicago, 827 F.3d 632, 636 (7th Cir. 2016). But leave to amend doesn’t have
to be granted when, as here, it’s clear that amendment would be futile. Bogie v. Rosenberg, 705 F.3d 603, 608 (7th Cir. 2013).

I will direct the clerk of court to record a strike against Criss under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (g).

ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff Alonzo Criss’s complaint, Dkt. 1, is DISMISSED with prejudice because it
fails to state a claim.
2. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment and close the case.
3. The clerk of court is directed to record a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (g) against
Criss.
Entered April 15, 2026.
BY THE COURT:

/s/

JAMES D. PETERSON
District Judge