Recent changes
Thursday, March 5, 2026
In re Domestic Partnership of Campos & Nunoz - Pet Custody Dispute
The California Court of Appeal issued an opinion on March 5, 2026, in the case of In re Domestic Partnership of Campos & Nunoz. The court affirmed a lower court's order denying shared custody of a dog, noting errors in citing fictitious legal authorities but finding the claim forfeited. The opinion emphasizes the responsibility of courts and attorneys to verify legal citations, especially with AI-generated content.
Marriage of Crabtree - Family Law Appeal
The California Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, filed an opinion in the Marriage of Crabtree case on March 5, 2026. The case involves an appeal from an award of contractual attorney fees related to a contempt order for violating visitation orders. The court affirmed the trial court's award of attorney fees.
People v. Uceda - California Court of Appeal Opinion
The California Court of Appeal filed an opinion in People v. Uceda, concerning a conviction for murder and shooting from a vehicle. The court reversed one conviction due to instructional error, allowing the prosecution to retry the charge or proceed with a lesser included offense.
People v. Alvaro - Non-Precedential Opinion
The California Court of Appeal filed a non-precedential opinion in the case of People v. Alvaro. The defendant was found guilty of 10 counts arising from sexual offenses against two minors. The appellate court affirmed the conviction, finding no reversible error.
People v. Nelson - California Court of Appeal Opinion
The California Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court's denial of mental health diversion for Ryan Anthony Nelson, who was sentenced to 12 years for burglary and auto theft. The court found Nelson's mental health disorders were not significant factors in his crimes and that he was unsuitable for diversion.
People v. Tindall - Criminal Appeal
The California Court of Appeal affirmed a judgment against Christopher John Tindall, who was convicted of maintaining a place for unlawful cannabis sales and possession of cannabis for sale. Tindall appealed, arguing the trial court erred by preventing a religious exemption defense and by judicial misconduct. The appellate court disagreed with his contentions.
People v. Doster - Criminal Appeal
The California Court of Appeal reversed a criminal conviction in People v. Doster, finding that the trial court erred in discharging a prospective juror and violated the Racial Justice Act. The case is remanded for a new trial.
People v. Blake - Criminal Appeal
The California Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division Two, filed an opinion on March 5, 2026, in the case of People v. Blake. The court affirmed the trial court's order denying the defendant's petition for resentencing under section 1172.6, finding the evidence sufficient to support the conclusion that the defendant was the actual killer.
People v. Carrillo - Criminal Appeal
The California Court of Appeal reversed and remanded an order denying a petition for resentencing for Joe Carrillo. The court accepted the People's concession that Carrillo, sentenced as a juvenile to the functional equivalent of life without parole, is eligible for resentencing under Penal Code section 1170(d)(1).
Las Posas Valley Water v. Ventura County Waterworks - Water Rights Adjudication
The California Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court's judgment in a comprehensive water rights adjudication for the Las Posas Valley Groundwater Basin. The ruling addresses the allocation of groundwater rights among various landowners and water suppliers, including a 'physical solution' and the appointment of a watermaster.
Last 7 days
Most active sources
Browse Categories
Activity
Get daily alerts
Morning digest delivered to your inbox. Free.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
2 monitored sources
Get CA Courts alerts
Daily digest of CA Courts regulatory changes. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.