Changeflow GovPing

What do you monitor?

Curated feeds for your role. Pick your area and get exactly the sources you need.

Recent changes

Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

LuxCreo Inc. v. Carbon, Inc. - Patent Lawsuit

LuxCreo Inc. has filed a patent lawsuit against Carbon, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, docketed as 3:26-cv-01635, was filed on February 25, 2026, with the initial complaint and supporting exhibits submitted.

Routine Enforcement Intellectual Property
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Bakki et al v. Rubio et al - Immigration Habeas Corpus

A new case, Bakki et al v. Rubio et al, was filed on February 25, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief related to immigration actions.

Priority review Enforcement Immigration
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Smith v. City of San Jose - Civil Rights Case

A civil rights case, Smith v. City of San Jose, was filed on February 25, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The complaint seeks damages against the City of San Jose.

Routine Enforcement Civil Rights
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Dawydiak v. Femasys Inc. - Labor Diversity Case Filing

A new diversity labor case, Dawydiak v. Femasys Inc. et al., was filed on February 25, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a Notice of Removal from California State Court, with Femasys Inc. as the filing party.

Routine Enforcement Employment & Labor
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Foster v. United Parcel Service - Civil Rights Jobs Case

A civil rights jobs case titled Foster v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al. was filed on February 25, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a Notice of Removal from a state court action, with United Parcel Service, Inc. as the filing party.

Priority review Enforcement Employment & Labor
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Ramos v. Truist Bank - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, Ramos v. Truist Bank, was filed on February 25, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The filing includes a complaint, a consent to proceed before a US Magistrate Judge, and an ex parte application for a Temporary Restraining Order.

Priority review Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Roe CL 283 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. - Personal Injury Product Liability

A new civil case, Roe CL 283 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al., was filed on February 25, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves claims of personal injury and product liability. The filing includes a complaint and proposed summons.

Priority review Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Cooper v. State of California - Civil Rights Case

A new civil rights case, Cooper v. State of California, was filed on February 25, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The complaint names the State of California, the City and County of San Francisco, and various law enforcement officials as defendants. The case is based on a federal question.

Routine Enforcement Civil Rights
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

United African-Asian Abilities Club v. Comeragh Prospect, Llc - Civil Rights Case

A civil rights case was filed on February 25, 2026, by the United African-Asian Abilities Club against Comeragh Prospect, LLC. The case, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, alleges violations of federal question and civil rights laws related to accommodations. The filing fee was $405.

Priority review Enforcement Civil Rights
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Zhu et al v. Noem et al - Immigration Civil Case

A new civil case, Zhu et al v. Noem et al, was filed on February 25, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves 'Other Immigration Actions' and names Kristi Noem and others as defendants. The filing fee was $405.

Priority review Enforcement Immigration

Showing 20141–20150 of 21,438 changes

1 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2144

Get alerts when regulations change

Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.