United States v. Jesse Rance Moore - Criminal Appeal

The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Jesse Rance Moore for conspiracy to commit robbery, robbery, and brandishing a firearm. The court found no error in the district court's denial of motions to suppress evidence and statements.

Bradley Moore v. City of Fort Walton Beach - Case Opinion

The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued a non-precedential opinion in Bradley Moore v. City of Fort Walton Beach. The court reviewed the district court's dismissal of Moore's complaint alleging Brady and Giglio violations.

Bell v. Ohio Living Communities - Summary Judgment Affirmed

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Ohio Living Communities. The court found that the appellant failed to meet their burden by not disclosing an expert report by the deadline, and thus could not meet the reciprocal burden.

Ohio Court of Appeals rules on unlawful detention during traffic stop

The Ohio Court of Appeals reversed a trial court's decision to suppress evidence, ruling that a defendant fleeing from a traffic stop did not prolong the detention unlawfully. The court found the stop was terminated by the defendant's actions before any unlawful extension could occur.

State v. Rivers - Felony Sentencing Appeal Affirmed

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a felony sentencing appeal in State v. Rivers. The court found that the trial court properly considered sentencing statutes and that the imposed sentence was not contrary to law. The appellant's conviction involved drug possession offenses.

In re Estate of Troutman - Probate Court Erred Vacating Heirship Judgment

The Ohio Court of Appeals reversed a probate court's decision to vacate a 2003 heirship judgment. The appellate court found the judgment was potentially voidable, not void, and that the probate court erred in vacating it under its inherent authority. The ruling impacts the administration of the Estate of Roger Troutman.

H.A. v. J.A. - Ohio Court of Appeals Domestic Violence Opinion

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a domestic violence civil protection order (DVCPO) against the appellant. The court found sufficient evidence that the appellee feared imminent serious physical harm, upholding the trial court's decision to grant the DVCPO despite a magistrate's recommendation against it.

State v. Hurt - New Trial Motion Based on Newly Discovered Evidence

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's denial of a new trial motion based on newly discovered evidence in State v. Hurt. The appellate court found no prejudicial error in the trial court's determination that the defendant was not unavoidably prevented from discovering a codefendant's confession within the required timeframe.

State v. Jones - Ohio Court of Appeals Opinion

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's conviction of Kiante Jones for obstructing official business. The court found no irreconcilable conflict between the obstructing official business statute and the resisting arrest statute, upholding the State's discretion in charging decisions.

Mesenbrick v. Hartley - Appeal Dismissed

The Ohio Court of Appeals dismissed an appeal and cross-appeal in Mesenbrick v. Hartley. The court found that the trial court's dismissal without prejudice was not a final appealable order, rendering any potential errors harmless as the claims could be refiled.