Gerard v. Cuevas - Unlawful Detainer Rent Case Opinion

This document is an opinion from a California court regarding an unlawful detainer rent case, Gerard v. Cuevas. It provides a judicial interpretation of relevant housing and landlord-tenant laws.

Esparza v. Superior Court Case Information

This notice provides case information for Esparza v. Superior Court, identified by case number E085807. The update is from the California Courts Appellate Cases system. No specific compliance actions or deadlines are detailed.

Bartholomew v. Parking Concepts, Inc. - Civil Litigation

This document pertains to the civil case Bartholomew v. Parking Concepts, Inc., case number A171546, filed in a US court. The filing represents a new addition to the court's docket, initiating legal proceedings between the named parties.

Florida man pleads guilty to biofuel fraud conspiracy

Florida man pleads guilty to biofuel fraud conspiracy

Justice Department resolves lawsuit against Pennsylvania borough zoning code

Justice Department resolves lawsuit against Pennsylvania borough zoning code

Defendant pleads guilty to international human and drug smuggling conspiracy

Defendant pleads guilty to international human and drug smuggling conspiracy

Florida man sentenced to 48 months for tax evasion

Florida man sentenced to 48 months for tax evasion

Antifa member arrested for cyberstalking, threatening ICE officers

Antifa member arrested for cyberstalking, threatening ICE officers

Engstrom v. United States - Sentencing Reversed

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the sentencing of Paul Engstrom in a drug case. The court found that the district court erred in its application of sentencing enhancements, requiring a resentencing. This decision impacts how certain drug offenses are sentenced within the Ninth Circuit.

Montejo-Gonzalez v. Bondi - Immigration Habeas Corpus

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion in Montejo-Gonzalez v. Bondi, addressing a habeas corpus petition related to immigration detention. The court's decision clarifies legal standards applicable to such cases.