Changeflow GovPing

What do you monitor?

Curated feeds for your role. Pick your area and get exactly the sources you need.

Recent changes

Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

BAC Home Loans Servicing v. Stockstill - TILA and FDCPA Claims

The Louisiana Court of Appeal granted a writ in BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P. v. Stockstill, reversing the trial court's denial of a motion for summary judgment. The appellate court found that the Stockstills' claims under the Truth-in-Lending Act (TILA) were time-barred.

Priority review Enforcement Consumer Protection
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Claybourn v. Finley - Louisiana Court of Appeal Opinion

The Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit, issued an opinion in Claybourn v. Finley, docket number 2025 CW 1287. The court considered a writ application from Maria Finley and Maria A. Finley, Attorney at Law, LLC. The application was not considered due to the relator failing to include a copy of the petition.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

H.T.H. v. B.B.W. - New Jersey Superior Court Opinion

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed a final restraining order and an award of attorney's fees in the case of H.T.H. v. B.B.W. The court found sufficient evidence to support the predicate act of assault and the need for the restraining order, as well as the reasonableness of the fee award.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

L.A. v. E.K. - Child Relocation and Custody Case

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed a lower court's order granting a parent primary residence and permission to relocate with a child to Connecticut. The case involved child relocation and custody disputes between the parents.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Mitchell Kotler v. Noah Kane - Civil Appeal

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division dismissed the appeal in Mitchell Kotler v. Noah Kane (Docket No. A-2256-24) with prejudice and without costs, as the parties have settled their dispute. This non-precedential opinion is binding only on the parties involved.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

DCPP v. M.M. and A.M. - Child Abuse and Neglect Case

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division issued an opinion in DCPP v. M.M. and A.M. concerning findings of abuse and neglect. The court found that the trial court improperly admitted hearsay opinions from a child psychologist, which were critical to the case's outcome. The decision may impact how child testimony and expert assessments are handled in future cases.

Priority review Enforcement Social Services
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

S.S. v. Woodcliff Lake Board of Education - Appeal of HIB Policy Decision

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed in part and remanded in part a decision regarding the dismissal of a complaint. The case involved a student disciplined under the Board's Harassment, Intimidation, and Bullying (HIB) policy and the subsequent appeal process.

Routine Enforcement Education
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

New Jersey Solar Transition Court Opinion

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed a decision by the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities denying extension requests for solar energy projects under the Transition Incentive program. The court's opinion is non-precedential.

Routine Enforcement Energy
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

New Jersey Solar Transition Case Opinion

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed the Board of Public Utilities' denial of extension requests for solar energy projects under the Transition Incentive (TI) program. The court's decision impacts Ecological Systems, LLC and NJ Solar Power regarding their project timelines and eligibility.

Routine Enforcement Energy
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

M.B.M. v. M.R.-l. - Non-Precedential Court Opinion

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed a Family Part order regarding child custody and visitation. The court designated the plaintiff as the parent of primary residence and ordered supervised visitation for the defendant. The opinion is non-precedential.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration

Showing 15621–15630 of 20,798 changes

1 1561 1562 1563 1564 1565 2080

Get alerts when regulations change

Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.