Zhu v. Equativ Inc. - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, Zhu v. Equativ Inc., was filed on March 6, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, identified by docket number 3:26-cv-01976, is based on diversity jurisdiction and involves a claim of Personal Injury: Other. The initial filings include a complaint and proposed summons.

Mazor v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company - ERISA Labor Law

A new civil case, Mazor v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, was filed on March 6, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case concerns labor law under ERISA and was filed by Eli Mazor against Metropolitan Life Insurance Company.

A.S. v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons) - Civil Case Filing

A civil case, identified as A.S. v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons) et al, was filed on March 6, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case number is 3:26-cv-01982. The filing includes a complaint, proposed summons, and motions regarding plaintiff anonymity and proceeding before a US Magistrate Judge.

Conant v Evergreen Alliance Golf Limited - Civil Case

A new civil case, Conant v Evergreen Alliance Golf Limited, was filed on March 6, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a Notice of Removal from Alameda County Superior Court and is based on diversity jurisdiction.

Petillo v. US - Prison Condition Case

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California has filed a new civil case, Case Number 5:26-cv-01950-VKD, titled Petillo v. US. The case involves a federal question related to prisoner conditions and was filed on March 6, 2026.

US Right to Know v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services - FOIA Lawsuit

US Right to Know has filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, filed on March 6, 2026, concerns a Freedom of Information Act request. The filing includes a complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief.

Pontiac Police Retirement System v Soleno Therapeutics - Securities Fraud

The City of Pontiac Police and Fire Retirement System has filed a securities fraud lawsuit against Soleno Therapeutics, Inc. and its executives. The case, filed on March 6, 2026, alleges violations of federal securities laws. This action initiates a class action lawsuit.

F. v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons) - Civil Rights Case

A civil rights case was filed on March 6, 2026, against the United States of America and the Federal Bureau of Prisons. The case, identified as Case Number 4:26-cv-01977, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

ASADI v. US Dept of Education - Federal Question Mandamus

A new civil case, ASADI v. US Dept of Education, was filed on March 6, 2026, in the US District Court for the Northern District of California. The case is based on a Federal Question and seeks a Mandamus. The initial filings include a complaint and a proposed scheduling order.

K.S. v. United States of America et al - Civil Rights Case

A new civil rights case, K.S. v. United States of America et al, was filed on March 6, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a U.S. Government Defendant and is classified under Civil Rights: Other. The filing includes a complaint and a request to proceed under a pseudonym.

A.C. v. United States of America - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, A.C. v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons) et al, was filed on March 6, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case number is 3:26-cv-01983. Initial filings include a complaint, proposed summons, a motion to maintain anonymity, and a consent to proceed before a US Magistrate Judge.

A.T. v. United States - Civil Rights Case

A civil rights case, A.T. v. United States, was filed on March 6, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves the U.S. government as a defendant and concerns civil rights.

CrowdStrike Inc. v. AIStrike Inc. - Trademark Case

CrowdStrike Inc. has filed a trademark infringement lawsuit against AIStrike Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, filed on March 6, 2026, concerns alleged trademark violations. No specific penalties or compliance deadlines have been detailed in the initial filing.

Simutis v. Kakkis et al - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, Simutis v. Kakkis et al, was filed on March 6, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, bearing number 3:26-cv-01985, is based on a Federal Question and involves Stockholders Suits.

Thomas v. Rodgers et al - Stockholders Suit

A new civil case, Thomas v. Rodgers et al, was filed on March 6, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case is a stockholder suit based on diversity jurisdiction. No recent filings or case summary are available.

Dunagan v. Technical Education Services, Inc. - Civil Rights: Jobs

A Notice of Removal was filed on March 6, 2026, in the case Dunagan v. Technical Education Services, Inc. The case, involving Civil Rights and Jobs, was removed from Alameda County Superior Court to the US District Court for the Northern District of California. Technical Education Services, Inc. is the filing party.

California State University v. US Department of Education - Administrative Review

The Board of Trustees of the California State University has filed a civil case against the US Department of Education. The case, filed on March 6, 2026, seeks an injunction against the US government or vacatur of an agency decision under the Administrative Procedures Act.

Uriarte v. BMO Bank, N.A - Real Property Case

A new civil case, Uriarte v. BMO Bank, N.A., was filed on March 6, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves real property and includes an ex parte application for a temporary restraining order to enjoin a sale scheduled for March 12, 2026.

Gopi Valliammal et al v. Edlow et al - Immigration Action

A new civil case, Gopi Valliammal et al v. Edlow et al, was filed on March 6, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves 'Other Immigration Actions' with the U.S. Government listed as a defendant. The initial filings include a complaint and proposed summons.

B. et al v. TikTok Inc. et al - Personal Injury Product Liability

A civil case was filed on March 6, 2026, against TikTok Inc., Google LLC, and Snap, Inc. The case, identified as 4:26-cv-01965 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, is based on diversity jurisdiction and concerns personal injury product liability.

CNIL Closes Order Against KASPR Following GDPR Violations

The CNIL has closed an order against KASPR, originally issued on December 5, 2024, which included a €240,000 fine for GDPR violations related to data collection from LinkedIn. KASPR has demonstrated compliance with the corrective measures, leading to the closure of the order and the non-liquidation of a potential daily penalty.

Syrian National Extradited for Human Smuggling Investigation

Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) El Paso announced the extradition of a Syrian national, Jalal Maklad Adeeb, to the U.S. to face charges related to a human smuggling operation. Adeeb is accused of leading an international network that smuggled hundreds of individuals into the U.S. for financial gain, collecting approximately $800,000 in fees.

ICE Custody Death Notification: Pejman Karshenas Najafabadi

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) announced the death of Pejman Karshenas Najafabadi, a 59-year-old Iranian national, in ICE custody in Natchez, Mississippi, on March 1, 2026. Najafabadi passed away from cardiac arrest at Merit Health Hospital after receiving medical care for pre-existing conditions. ICE is required to publicize such in-custody death reports.

Haitian man facing assault charges died in ICE custody

ICE announced the death of Emanuel Cleeford Damas, an individual facing criminal charges for assault and battery, while in ICE custody in Scottsdale, Arizona on March 2, 2026. Damas had a pending immigration case and was detained under the Lanken Riley Act.

Texas Government Accountability Association v. City of Odessa - Dismissed

The Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District, has dismissed the appeal in Texas Government Accountability Association v. City of Odessa. The appellant filed a notice of withdrawal, indicating they no longer wished to pursue the appeal of the trial court's decision which declared an interlocal agreement void and unenforceable.

Texas Court of Appeals Affirms Child Termination of Parental Rights

The Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District, affirmed a trial court's order terminating the parental rights of a mother and father. The appellate court found the mother's appeal to be frivolous and without merit, following procedures outlined in Anders v. California.

Wally Yammine v. Warren Fonville, PLLC - Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

The Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District, has dismissed the appeal in Wally Yammine v. Warren Fonville, PLLC, for want of jurisdiction. The court found that the appellant, acting as executor, lacked the capacity to represent the estate in the appeal.

Tony Chavez v. State of Texas - Habeas Corpus - Bail Dismissed

The Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District, dismissed Tony Chavez's original proceeding seeking a bond reduction. The court found it lacked original habeas jurisdiction in criminal cases, as such jurisdiction is limited to county courts, district courts, and the Court of Criminal Appeals. The proceeding was dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Griffin Energy Law v. Billingsley - Real Estate Title Dispute

The Texas Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's decision in a real estate title dispute concerning mineral interests. The court found that the appellees successfully rebutted the community property presumption with clear and convincing evidence, upholding the judgment in their favor.

CMA Considers Energy Licence Appeal Decision Deadline

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) is considering appeals from 5 energy companies against modifications to gas distribution licences made by Ofgem. The CMA is expected to decide whether to grant permission to appeal by 31 March 2026.

Draft Guidance: Responding to FDA Form 483 Observations for Drug Manufacturers

The FDA has issued draft guidance for drug manufacturers on how to respond to observations noted on FDA Form 483 following CGMP inspections. This guidance is intended to assist domestic and foreign manufacturers in assessing conformity with CGMP requirements.

Colorado Warns of Online Investment Scams During Consumer Protection Week

The Colorado Division of Securities issued a warning about online investment scams during National Consumer Protection Week. The notice highlights common schemes like unsolicited cryptocurrency fraud and romance scams, referencing FTC data on significant financial losses to these activities.

Thomas v. Rodgers et al - Securities/Commodities Civil Case

A new civil case, Thomas v. Rodgers et al., was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on March 6, 2026. The case involves securities and commodities and includes a Verified Stockholder Derivative Complaint.

Legends Bank v. Orusa - Appeal Dismissed for Late Filing

The Tennessee Court of Appeals dismissed an appeal filed by Samson Orusa against Legends Bank and the Tennessee Department of Revenue. The dismissal was due to the appellant failing to file the notice of appeal with the Appellate Court Clerk within the mandatory 30-day period after the order was entered.

State-Funded Cleanup Enables New Affordable Housing

The California Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) announced the opening of 43 new affordable homes in Richmond, funded by a state cleanup program. This project is part of a larger initiative to convert contaminated land into safe housing, with over 200 homes expected across three sites this year.

Freedom of Information Act Implementing Regulations Updated

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has updated its Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) implementing regulations. These changes aim to enhance clarity and efficiency in processing FOIA requests. The rule is effective March 6, 2026.

State AG Criticizes Aquarion Sale Approval, Citing Doubled Water Bills

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong criticized the Public Utilities Regulatory Authority's preliminary approval of the Aquarion water company sale to a nonprofit, projecting doubled water bills for consumers. The decision reverses a prior denial and is expected to significantly impact public oversight and consumer protections.

US v. John McLaurin - Criminal Case Vacated and Remanded

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated and remanded the criminal case of US v. John McLaurin. The court found that discretionary supervised release conditions not orally pronounced at sentencing are nullities, impacting the revocation judgment. The case is remanded for resentencing.

Cedar Coal Company v. Director, DOWCP - Black Lung Benefits Decision

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals denied Cedar Coal Company's petition to review an order awarding black lung benefits to the estate of Roger L. Mullins. The court found that the Administrative Law Judge's decision was supported by substantial evidence and that the claimant presented sufficient evidence within regulatory limitations.

State v. Lanier - Ohio Court of Appeals Affirms Trial Judgment

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's judgment in the consolidated cases of State v. Lanier. The court found that the record clearly and convincingly supported the trial court's findings regarding the sentences imposed on the appellant.

State v. Norman - Resentencing Remand

The Ohio Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the case of State v. Norman for resentencing. The trial court failed to provide required notifications under the Reagan Tokes Act during the initial sentencing. The judgment is affirmed in all other respects.

State v. Johnson - Appeal Dismissed as Moot

The Ohio Court of Appeals dismissed an appeal in State v. Johnson as moot because the appellant had already served his jail sentence. The court noted that the appeal concerned a judgment revoking community control sanctions.

State v. Trotter - Criminal Appeal

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's judgment in State v. Trotter, finding that the appellant's plea of no contest was voluntary and knowingly made. The court addressed an assignment of error regarding ineffective assistance of counsel.

State v. Dominguez-Olivia - Speedy Trial and Due Process Rights

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a defendant's convictions, ruling that his statutory and constitutional speedy trial rights, as well as his due process rights, were not violated. The court found sufficient evidence supported the convictions and that they were not against the manifest weight of the evidence.

State v. Giron - Motion to Suppress OVI

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's decision in State v. Giron, denying a motion to suppress evidence in an OVI case. The court found reasonable suspicion for the traffic stop and probable cause for the arrest, and permitted an amendment to the OVI charge without prejudice to the defendant.

State v. Wilson - Public Records Denial

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's decision denying a defendant's motions for public records. The court found the motions were barred by res judicata and the information sought was not necessary for a justiciable claim.

State v. Johnson - Child Victim Testimony Statute Violation

The Ohio Court of Appeals reversed and vacated parts of a trial court's judgment against Chadwick Johnson, finding that the trial court violated Johnson's right to confrontation by allowing child victims to testify outside his presence without proper findings. The appellate court remanded the case for a new trial on specific charges due to insufficient evidence.

State v. Fogle - Dog Bite Restitution Upheld

The Ohio Court of Appeals upheld a trial court's order for restitution of $265.92 against Ellen Fogle, whose dog bit a neighbor and attacked the neighbor's dog. The court found sufficient evidence to support the restitution order in this consolidated appeal.

State v. Kynard - Criminal Sentencing Appeal

The Ohio Court of Appeals reversed a trial court's judgment regarding consecutive sentencing. The case is remanded for the limited purpose of providing post-release control notification to the defendant. The court found the original sentencing order improperly imposed a consecutive sentence to another unsentenced case.

Finn v. Rutherford - Landlord-Tenant Dispute Affirmed

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's judgment in Finn v. Rutherford, a landlord-tenant dispute. The appellate court found that the appellant failed to present objections to the magistrate's decision and did not file a transcript, preventing a review of the merits.