A.D. v. US Bureau of Prisons - Civil Case Filing

A civil case, A.D. v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons), was filed on March 5, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The filing includes a complaint, proposed summons, a motion to maintain plaintiff anonymity, and a consent to proceed before a US Magistrate Judge.

TCPA Case Motion to Dismiss Denied

The Northern District of Georgia denied a motion to dismiss a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) case against RES 360 LLC and Peach City Properties LLC. The court found that the plaintiff's allegations regarding unsolicited text messages were sufficient to proceed. This ruling allows the class action lawsuit to move forward.

In re Domestic Partnership of Campos & Nunoz - Pet Custody Dispute

The California Court of Appeal issued an opinion on March 5, 2026, in the case of In re Domestic Partnership of Campos & Nunoz. The court affirmed a lower court's order denying shared custody of a dog, noting errors in citing fictitious legal authorities but finding the claim forfeited. The opinion emphasizes the responsibility of courts and attorneys to verify legal citations, especially with AI-generated content.

In re N.J. - Juvenile Dependency Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, Fifth Appellate District, filed a non-precedential opinion in the case of In re N.J. The appeal concerns a juvenile court's dispositional order removing a child from her mother's custody based on allegations of sexual abuse, which the mother contends were improperly considered. The opinion addresses the mother's challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence and procedural due process.

In re C.R. - Termination of Parental Rights Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, Fifth Appellate District, issued an opinion in the case In re C.R. The appeal challenges an order terminating parental rights, with the court affirming the order after finding any procedural error was harmless.

People v. Doster - Criminal Appeal

The California Court of Appeal reversed a criminal conviction in People v. Doster, finding that the trial court erred in discharging a prospective juror and violated the Racial Justice Act. The case is remanded for a new trial.

People v. Carrillo - Criminal Appeal

The California Court of Appeal reversed and remanded an order denying a petition for resentencing for Joe Carrillo. The court accepted the People's concession that Carrillo, sentenced as a juvenile to the functional equivalent of life without parole, is eligible for resentencing under Penal Code section 1170(d)(1).

People v. Blake - Criminal Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division Two, filed an opinion on March 5, 2026, in the case of People v. Blake. The court affirmed the trial court's order denying the defendant's petition for resentencing under section 1172.6, finding the evidence sufficient to support the conclusion that the defendant was the actual killer.

People v. Alvaro - Non-Precedential Opinion

The California Court of Appeal filed a non-precedential opinion in the case of People v. Alvaro. The defendant was found guilty of 10 counts arising from sexual offenses against two minors. The appellate court affirmed the conviction, finding no reversible error.

People v. Nelson - California Court of Appeal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court's denial of mental health diversion for Ryan Anthony Nelson, who was sentenced to 12 years for burglary and auto theft. The court found Nelson's mental health disorders were not significant factors in his crimes and that he was unsuitable for diversion.

People v. Uceda - California Court of Appeal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal filed an opinion in People v. Uceda, concerning a conviction for murder and shooting from a vehicle. The court reversed one conviction due to instructional error, allowing the prosecution to retry the charge or proceed with a lesser included offense.

People v. Tindall - Criminal Appeal

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a judgment against Christopher John Tindall, who was convicted of maintaining a place for unlawful cannabis sales and possession of cannabis for sale. Tindall appealed, arguing the trial court erred by preventing a religious exemption defense and by judicial misconduct. The appellate court disagreed with his contentions.

Las Posas Valley Water v. Ventura County Waterworks - Water Rights Adjudication

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court's judgment in a comprehensive water rights adjudication for the Las Posas Valley Groundwater Basin. The ruling addresses the allocation of groundwater rights among various landowners and water suppliers, including a 'physical solution' and the appointment of a watermaster.

In re Meraz - Habeas Corpus

The California Court of Appeal issued an opinion in the case of In re Meraz, concerning a petition for resentencing under Penal Code section 1172.6. The court addressed whether Proposition 57, which altered juvenile prosecution procedures, should have been applied retroactively to the petitioner's case, impacting his direct appeal and the effectiveness of counsel.

Marriage of Crabtree - Family Law Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, filed an opinion in the Marriage of Crabtree case on March 5, 2026. The case involves an appeal from an award of contractual attorney fees related to a contempt order for violating visitation orders. The court affirmed the trial court's award of attorney fees.

Moramarco v. Nowakoski - Appeal of Trustee's Civil Penalty

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court's judgment against a trustee, Edward J. Nowakoski, in the case of Moramarco v. Nowakoski. The court ordered the judgment amended to clarify postjudgment interest accrual on prejudgment interest, affirming the civil penalty and attorney fees awarded to the beneficiaries.

In re G.M. - Juvenile Court Law Appeal

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a juvenile court's probation condition prohibiting the use, sale, or possession of non-prescribed medications. The appellant argued the condition was unconstitutionally vague and overbroad, but the court found it valid.

People v. Super. Ct. - Pretrial Diversion for Mental Health

The California Court of Appeal granted a petition to vacate a trial court's order granting pretrial diversion to a defendant charged with attempted murder and assault. The appellate court found insufficient evidence that the defendant would comply with treatment, a prerequisite for diversion under Penal Code section 1001.36.

Colorado PUC Highlights Consumer Protection Efforts

The Colorado Public Utilities Commission (PUC) issued a notice highlighting its consumer protection efforts during National Consumer Protection Week. The PUC detailed its work in handling complaints, securing refunds for consumers, and enforcing regulations, particularly in the towing industry, noting significant consumer savings in 2024 and 2025.

Z Grills, Inc. Consent Order under Securities Act

The Washington State Department of Financial Institutions Securities Division has issued a Consent Order against Z Grills, Inc. for alleged violations of the Securities Act of Washington. Z Grills offered and sold over $140,000 in securities through its Reward Crowdfunding Program to over 180 Washington investors without proper registration or disclosure.

Clarence White v. Reiling Teder & Schrier, LLC - Court Opinion

The Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's summary judgment ruling in favor of Reiling Teder & Schrier, LLC. The case involved a complaint against the debt collection firm under the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). The court found no error in the lower court's decision.

Dollar Tree Stores Inc. v. Dollar Tree Stores Inc. - Civil Case Filing

Dollar Tree Stores Inc. filed a Notice of Removal on March 5, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, case number 4:26-cv-01919. The case was removed from Contra Costa Superior Court. Dollar Tree Stores Inc. also filed a Certificate of Interested Entities and a Corporate Disclosure Statement.

CPUC Protects Havasu Water Customers, Ensures Safe Drinking Water

The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) is taking action to protect Havasu Water Company customers and ensure safe drinking water. The CPUC is addressing a court order to relocate a pipeline by June 15, 2026, and has initiated formal action alleging management deficiencies that could lead to receivership.

State Bike Grants Reduce Car Trips and Air Pollution

Washington State's Department of Ecology highlights successful bike grant projects in Shoreline, Tacoma, and Wenatchee. These projects, funded by the Climate Commitment Act, aim to reduce air pollution by encouraging cycling and limiting car trips in overburdened communities.

DOJ Proposed Rule for Attorney Bar Complaints

The Department of Justice has proposed a new rule regarding the review of state bar complaints and allegations against Department of Justice attorneys. The public comment period for this proposed rule is open until April 6, 2026.

California AG Shuts Down Meth Lab, Seizes $1.2M in Drugs

California Attorney General Bonta announced the seizure of $1.2 million in methamphetamine and the arrest of three individuals during the dismantling of a major conversion lab in Turlock. The operation, involving multiple state, local, and federal agencies, recovered 280 pounds of drugs and eight firearms.

State AGs Defend Contraceptive Access Against Trump Rules

California Attorney General Rob Bonta joined a coalition of 22 state attorneys general in filing an amicus brief supporting a lawsuit against Trump Administration regulations that allowed employers to restrict access to no-cost contraception. The brief argues these rules undermine the ACA and could shift millions in costs to individuals.

State AGs Urge Caution on Autonomous Hazardous Materials Transport Rules

California Attorney General Rob Bonta, joined by nine other state Attorneys General, urged the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) to exercise caution in developing regulations for the autonomous transport of hazardous materials. The coalition emphasized the need for proven safety and reliability before allowing such systems to operate.

California v. Trump - Lawsuit Over Unlawful Tariffs

California, along with 22 other states, has filed a lawsuit challenging President Trump's imposition of global tariffs under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. The lawsuit argues the President's justification for using this section is illegal and outside the statute's limited circumstances. This action follows a previous successful challenge to tariffs imposed under a different act.

California AG Warns of Scams on Slam the Scam Day

California Attorney General Rob Bonta issued a consumer alert warning Californians about Social Security and government imposter scams on the Seventh Annual Slam the Scam Day. The alert highlights the increasing financial losses to scams reported by the FTC and provides tips for consumers to protect themselves.

Natchez Trace Property Owners Association v. Branighans - Court Opinion

The Louisiana Court of Appeal dismissed a writ in the case of Natchez Trace Property Owners Association, Inc. v. Michael R. Branighan and Michelle T. Branighan. The dismissal was based on counsel's advice that the case had been settled and resolved.

United States v. Jimenez - Appeal of Sentencing Conditions

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's sentencing decision for William Jimenez, who pleaded guilty to possessing ammunition after a felony conviction. The court upheld the imposition of special conditions of supervised release, including searches of electronic devices and mandatory mental health counseling.

Safdieh v. Commissioner - Tax Court Summary Judgment Granted

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a Tax Court order that granted summary judgment to Joseph Safdieh. The court held that the Commissioner of Internal Revenue may assess penalties under I.R.C. § 6038(b) for failing to report control of a foreign business, reversing the Tax Court's ruling that required the Commissioner to seek penalties in federal district court.

Connecticut Fair Housing Center v. CoreLogic Rental Property Solutions - Fair Housing Act

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated in part, affirmed in part, and reversed in part a district court decision concerning alleged violations of the Fair Housing Act and Fair Credit Reporting Act by CoreLogic Rental Property Solutions. The court found the Connecticut Fair Housing Center lacked standing and that CoreLogic did not cause housing denials based on criminal history, thus failing the disparate impact claim.

Kellogg v. Nichols - Judicial Immunity and Firearms Licensing

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals amended its opinion in Kellogg v. Nichols, affirming that state court judges have absolute judicial immunity for decisions on firearms license applications. The court also held that federal courts lack jurisdiction under Article III for such claims against judges in their official capacities.

Peña Garcia v. Department of Labor - Workers' Compensation

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals denied a petition for review in Peña Garcia v. Department of Labor. The court affirmed the denial of reimbursement for medical cannabis-infused products under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act, citing federal law classifying marijuana as a Schedule I substance.

US v. Cardenas - Cocaine Import Conspiracy Conviction Vacated

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated the conviction of Jey James Roldan Cardenas for conspiracy to import cocaine. The court found that the district court erred in excluding evidence relevant to Cardenas's state of mind, potentially impacting the jury's assessment of his criminal intent.

B.B. v. Hochul - Children's Foster Care Certification Rights

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed in part and affirmed in part a district court's dismissal of a case concerning New York's child foster care certification scheme. The court found that plaintiffs, children denied placement with relatives due to criminal history or abuse reports, have standing to sue, but some claims are moot.

Broadcast Music v. Concert Promoters - Antitrust Licensing Fees

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a district court's decision regarding music licensing fees set by Broadcast Music, Inc. (BMI) for concert promoters. The court found the imposed rates and expanded definition of gross revenues to be unreasonable and remanded the case for further proceedings.

Lanesborough 2000 LLC v. Nextres LLC - Appeal of Arbitration Award

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on an appeal concerning an arbitration award between Lanesborough 2000 LLC and Nextres LLC. The court found the waiver of appeal rights in the arbitration agreement ambiguous and partially affirmed the district court's judgment, while vacating another part related to an injunction of state-court proceedings.

Second Circuit Rules on Mt. Hawley Insurance Appeal

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision, holding that Mt. Hawley Insurance Company must provide additional insured coverage to Reidy Contracting Group, LLC. The court found Reidy to be an additional insured and that the Employers Liability Exclusion did not bar coverage.

McGucken v. Shutterstock, Inc. - Copyright Infringement Appeal

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals partially affirmed and partially vacated a lower court's decision in McGucken v. Shutterstock, Inc. The court affirmed the dismissal of the false copyright management information claim but vacated the dismissal of copyright infringement claims, remanding for further proceedings on specific factual issues.

Mar-Can Transport v. Local 854 Pension Fund - ERISA Withdrawal Liability

The Second Circuit affirmed a district court's decision in Mar-Can Transport Co. v. Local 854 Pension Fund, reducing Mar-Can's ERISA withdrawal liability by $1.8 million. The court interpreted a key provision of ERISA concerning the transfer of unfunded vested benefits when an employer switches pension plans due to union representation changes.

SBK ART LLC v. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP - Discovery for Foreign Litigation

The Second Circuit affirmed a district court's order granting SBK ART LLC's petition for discovery in aid of foreign litigation under 28 U.S.C. §1782. The court disagreed with Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP's argument that discovery should be denied if not discoverable from the foreign client abroad.

US v. Aryeetey - Felon in Possession of Firearm Conviction Affirmed

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction and sentence of Ivan Joel Aryeetey for being a felon in possession of a firearm. The court found no abuse of discretion in admitting DNA evidence and deemed the sentence substantively reasonable.

Care One LLC v. NLRB - Unfair Labor Practice Proceedings

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's denial of a preliminary injunction for Care One LLC and its affiliates. The healthcare facilities sought to halt NLRB proceedings for alleged unfair labor practices, arguing the NLRB lacked a lawful quorum and the ALJ's appointment was unconstitutional. The court found the plaintiffs could not demonstrate irreparable harm.

In the Matter of F.T. - Police Officer Disqualification Appeal

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed a Civil Service Commission decision removing F.T. from an eligible list for Police Officer due to psychological disqualification. The court upheld the dismissal of F.T.'s appeal based on his failure to timely submit required psychological reports.

State v. Cenesca - Appeal of Post-Conviction Relief Denial

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed an order denying a defendant's petition for post-conviction relief. The defendant appealed previous orders related to his plea counsel's alleged failure to advise him on immigration consequences.

State v. Jovy Delphine - Criminal Appeal

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed a lower court's decision denying a motion to suppress evidence in the case of State v. Jovy Delphine. The court found that the investigating officer had reasonable suspicion for the motor vehicle stop, which led to the seizure of evidence supporting the defendant's conviction.

Goodheart v. Wieder - New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division Opinion

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed the dismissal of a personal injury complaint against American Multi-Cinema, Inc. and Frederick Wieder. The court found the dismissal orders to be proper based on the proceedings below.