Changeflow GovPing

What do you monitor?

Curated feeds for your role. Pick your area and get exactly the sources you need.

Recent changes

Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

R.G.W. v. H.R.A. - Alabama Court Opinion

The Alabama Court of Civil Appeals released an opinion in R.G.W. v. H.R.A. on March 6, 2026. The case involves a dispute over child custody and paternity, originating from a settlement agreement filed in 2021. The court's opinion addresses jurisdictional issues and the legal status of the child's father.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

T.H. and R.H. v. D.C.C. and Re.H. - Civil Appeals Opinion

The Alabama Court of Civil Appeals released an opinion in T.H. and R.H. v. D.C.C. and Re.H. on March 6, 2026. The court reversed a juvenile court judgment concerning child custody and paternity, remanding the case with instructions.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Matter of Cardillo - Attorney Disciplinary Proceedings

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York has issued an opinion in the Matter of Christopher Scott Cardillo. The case involves disciplinary proceedings against an attorney accused of professional misconduct, specifically the conversion and/or misappropriation of entrusted funds totaling over $4.7 million.

Urgent Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for cdle.colorado.gov

Funding Available for Safe Digging Education and Awareness

The Colorado Department of Labor and Employment's Division of Oil and Public Safety is accepting applications for grants from the Damage Prevention Fund to support safe digging education. This fund, derived from fines for violating the Excavation Requirements Law, aims to prevent underground facility damage and ensure public safety. Up to $20,000 in grants will be awarded.

Priority review Notice Public Health
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

G. v. Lyft, Inc. - Civil Case Filing

A civil case, G. v. Lyft, Inc., was filed on February 19, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves claims of Assault, Libel & Slander. A recent filing on March 6, 2026, was a motion for leave to appear Pro Hac Vice.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
1mo ago USTR Press Releases
Favicon for ustr.gov

US and Mexico Launch USMCA Joint Review Discussions

The United States and Mexico have initiated the joint review process for the USMCA. Discussions will focus on reducing regional dependence, strengthening rules of origin, and enhancing supply chain security. Negotiators are scheduled to hold their first meeting the week of March 16, 2026.

Priority review Notice International Trade
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Horazdovsky v. Horazdovsky - Child Custody Appeal

The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision to change primary physical custody of three children from the mother to the father. The court found that the trial court's decision was supported by the evidence presented regarding the children's best interests.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Thomas Tarhanich v. Memberselect Insurance Company - Insurance Benefits

The Michigan Court of Appeals reversed and remanded a trial court's dismissal of a personal protection insurance (PIP) benefits case. The appellate court found that the trial court erred in granting summary disposition to Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company, potentially impacting how PIP benefits are claimed under the state's no-fault act.

Priority review Enforcement Insurance
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Coleman v. Magni Industries Inc - Employment Dispute

The Michigan Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the case of Martaz Coleman v. Magni Industries Inc. The court reconsidered the case in light of a Supreme Court decision, impacting the interpretation of employment agreements and statutes of limitations.

Priority review Enforcement Employment & Labor
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Warren Consolidated School District v School District of the City of Hazel Park

The Michigan Supreme Court issued an opinion in a dispute between two school districts over pupil enrollment and state funding. The case involves claims of unjust enrichment and challenges to state audits under the State School Aid Act. The court's decision clarifies the process for resolving such funding disputes.

Priority review Enforcement Education

Showing 39011–39020 of 43,682 changes

1 3900 3901 3902 3903 3904 4369

Get alerts when regulations change

Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.