In re J.R.P. - Ohio Court of Appeals Opinion

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's decision denying a father's motion to terminate shared parenting and reduce his parenting time. The court found the juvenile court did not err in reviewing best-interest factors and did not abuse its discretion.

State v. Galindez - Affirmation of Rape Conviction

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Angelo M. Galindez for sex offenses against a child under ten. The court found no ineffective assistance of counsel and that the convictions were not against the manifest weight of the evidence.

Goldshtein v. Cuyahoga Cty. Fiscal Officer - Abuse of Discretion

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's decision, finding no abuse of discretion in upholding the Cuyahoga County Board of Revision's assessment of property value. The appellant failed to establish sufficient evidence that the board's decision was in error.

In re G.M. - Court Denies Father's Motion to Modify Legal Custody

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a juvenile court's denial of a father's motion to modify legal custody of his child. The court found no changed circumstances to warrant modification, citing evidence of abuse predating the prior decree and the father's ongoing criminal conduct.

State v. Ward - Murder, Assault, Counsel Appeal

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions of Davion Ward for murder and felonious assault. The court found sufficient evidence and that the convictions were not against the manifest weight of the evidence, also denying claims of ineffective assistance of counsel and cumulative error.

Anderson v. Jack Cleveland Casino, LLC - Summary Judgment and Statute of Limitations

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision to grant summary judgment in favor of Jack Cleveland Casino, LLC. The court found that the plaintiff's complaint was filed outside the applicable two-year statute of limitations and that his status as a vexatious litigator required him to obtain leave from the court before filing.

State v. McFarland - Ohio Court of Appeals Case

The Ohio Court of Appeals ruled in State v. McFarland that a victim's right to privacy under Marsy's Law is subordinate to a defendant's right to compulsory process. The court affirmed the denial of the victim's motion to quash subpoenas for electronic device data, modifying the scope of the order.

Francis v. Cleveland Clinic Found. - Ohio Medical Negligence Case

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of a medical negligence survivorship claim against Cleveland Clinic Foundation. The court found the claim was filed outside the statute of limitations and that the appellant's counsel failed to provide proper notice. The court also upheld the exclusion of a loss-of-chance theory.

Fugo v. Rae - Breach of Contract Case Affirmed

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision in Fugo v. Rae, a breach of contract case. The court found that the trial court's award of $1,200 was not against the manifest weight of the evidence, and the defendant's appeal was dismissed due to lack of a cross-appeal.

Kittis v. Cleveland Clinic Found. - Medical Malpractice Opinion Affirmed

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a jury verdict in favor of the Cleveland Clinic Foundation in a medical malpractice case. The court found that the trial court did not err in denying motions for a new trial or mistrial, and any potential error in introducing new causation theories was harmless.