Dollar Tree Stores Inc. v. Dollar Tree Stores Inc. - Civil Case Filing

Dollar Tree Stores Inc. filed a Notice of Removal on March 5, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, case number 4:26-cv-01919. The case was removed from Contra Costa Superior Court. Dollar Tree Stores Inc. also filed a Certificate of Interested Entities and a Corporate Disclosure Statement.

CPUC Protects Havasu Water Customers, Ensures Safe Drinking Water

The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) is taking action to protect Havasu Water Company customers and ensure safe drinking water. The CPUC is addressing a court order to relocate a pipeline by June 15, 2026, and has initiated formal action alleging management deficiencies that could lead to receivership.

State Bike Grants Reduce Car Trips and Air Pollution

Washington State's Department of Ecology highlights successful bike grant projects in Shoreline, Tacoma, and Wenatchee. These projects, funded by the Climate Commitment Act, aim to reduce air pollution by encouraging cycling and limiting car trips in overburdened communities.

DOJ Proposed Rule for Attorney Bar Complaints

The Department of Justice has proposed a new rule regarding the review of state bar complaints and allegations against Department of Justice attorneys. The public comment period for this proposed rule is open until April 6, 2026.

California AG Shuts Down Meth Lab, Seizes $1.2M in Drugs

California Attorney General Bonta announced the seizure of $1.2 million in methamphetamine and the arrest of three individuals during the dismantling of a major conversion lab in Turlock. The operation, involving multiple state, local, and federal agencies, recovered 280 pounds of drugs and eight firearms.

State AGs Defend Contraceptive Access Against Trump Rules

California Attorney General Rob Bonta joined a coalition of 22 state attorneys general in filing an amicus brief supporting a lawsuit against Trump Administration regulations that allowed employers to restrict access to no-cost contraception. The brief argues these rules undermine the ACA and could shift millions in costs to individuals.

State AGs Urge Caution on Autonomous Hazardous Materials Transport Rules

California Attorney General Rob Bonta, joined by nine other state Attorneys General, urged the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) to exercise caution in developing regulations for the autonomous transport of hazardous materials. The coalition emphasized the need for proven safety and reliability before allowing such systems to operate.

California v. Trump - Lawsuit Over Unlawful Tariffs

California, along with 22 other states, has filed a lawsuit challenging President Trump's imposition of global tariffs under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. The lawsuit argues the President's justification for using this section is illegal and outside the statute's limited circumstances. This action follows a previous successful challenge to tariffs imposed under a different act.

California AG Warns of Scams on Slam the Scam Day

California Attorney General Rob Bonta issued a consumer alert warning Californians about Social Security and government imposter scams on the Seventh Annual Slam the Scam Day. The alert highlights the increasing financial losses to scams reported by the FTC and provides tips for consumers to protect themselves.

Natchez Trace Property Owners Association v. Branighans - Court Opinion

The Louisiana Court of Appeal dismissed a writ in the case of Natchez Trace Property Owners Association, Inc. v. Michael R. Branighan and Michelle T. Branighan. The dismissal was based on counsel's advice that the case had been settled and resolved.

United States v. Jimenez - Appeal of Sentencing Conditions

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's sentencing decision for William Jimenez, who pleaded guilty to possessing ammunition after a felony conviction. The court upheld the imposition of special conditions of supervised release, including searches of electronic devices and mandatory mental health counseling.

Safdieh v. Commissioner - Tax Court Summary Judgment Granted

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a Tax Court order that granted summary judgment to Joseph Safdieh. The court held that the Commissioner of Internal Revenue may assess penalties under I.R.C. § 6038(b) for failing to report control of a foreign business, reversing the Tax Court's ruling that required the Commissioner to seek penalties in federal district court.

Connecticut Fair Housing Center v. CoreLogic Rental Property Solutions - Fair Housing Act

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated in part, affirmed in part, and reversed in part a district court decision concerning alleged violations of the Fair Housing Act and Fair Credit Reporting Act by CoreLogic Rental Property Solutions. The court found the Connecticut Fair Housing Center lacked standing and that CoreLogic did not cause housing denials based on criminal history, thus failing the disparate impact claim.

Kellogg v. Nichols - Judicial Immunity and Firearms Licensing

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals amended its opinion in Kellogg v. Nichols, affirming that state court judges have absolute judicial immunity for decisions on firearms license applications. The court also held that federal courts lack jurisdiction under Article III for such claims against judges in their official capacities.

Peña Garcia v. Department of Labor - Workers' Compensation

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals denied a petition for review in Peña Garcia v. Department of Labor. The court affirmed the denial of reimbursement for medical cannabis-infused products under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act, citing federal law classifying marijuana as a Schedule I substance.

US v. Cardenas - Cocaine Import Conspiracy Conviction Vacated

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated the conviction of Jey James Roldan Cardenas for conspiracy to import cocaine. The court found that the district court erred in excluding evidence relevant to Cardenas's state of mind, potentially impacting the jury's assessment of his criminal intent.

B.B. v. Hochul - Children's Foster Care Certification Rights

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed in part and affirmed in part a district court's dismissal of a case concerning New York's child foster care certification scheme. The court found that plaintiffs, children denied placement with relatives due to criminal history or abuse reports, have standing to sue, but some claims are moot.

Broadcast Music v. Concert Promoters - Antitrust Licensing Fees

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a district court's decision regarding music licensing fees set by Broadcast Music, Inc. (BMI) for concert promoters. The court found the imposed rates and expanded definition of gross revenues to be unreasonable and remanded the case for further proceedings.

Lanesborough 2000 LLC v. Nextres LLC - Appeal of Arbitration Award

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on an appeal concerning an arbitration award between Lanesborough 2000 LLC and Nextres LLC. The court found the waiver of appeal rights in the arbitration agreement ambiguous and partially affirmed the district court's judgment, while vacating another part related to an injunction of state-court proceedings.

Second Circuit Rules on Mt. Hawley Insurance Appeal

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision, holding that Mt. Hawley Insurance Company must provide additional insured coverage to Reidy Contracting Group, LLC. The court found Reidy to be an additional insured and that the Employers Liability Exclusion did not bar coverage.

McGucken v. Shutterstock, Inc. - Copyright Infringement Appeal

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals partially affirmed and partially vacated a lower court's decision in McGucken v. Shutterstock, Inc. The court affirmed the dismissal of the false copyright management information claim but vacated the dismissal of copyright infringement claims, remanding for further proceedings on specific factual issues.

Mar-Can Transport v. Local 854 Pension Fund - ERISA Withdrawal Liability

The Second Circuit affirmed a district court's decision in Mar-Can Transport Co. v. Local 854 Pension Fund, reducing Mar-Can's ERISA withdrawal liability by $1.8 million. The court interpreted a key provision of ERISA concerning the transfer of unfunded vested benefits when an employer switches pension plans due to union representation changes.

SBK ART LLC v. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP - Discovery for Foreign Litigation

The Second Circuit affirmed a district court's order granting SBK ART LLC's petition for discovery in aid of foreign litigation under 28 U.S.C. §1782. The court disagreed with Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP's argument that discovery should be denied if not discoverable from the foreign client abroad.

US v. Aryeetey - Felon in Possession of Firearm Conviction Affirmed

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction and sentence of Ivan Joel Aryeetey for being a felon in possession of a firearm. The court found no abuse of discretion in admitting DNA evidence and deemed the sentence substantively reasonable.

Care One LLC v. NLRB - Unfair Labor Practice Proceedings

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's denial of a preliminary injunction for Care One LLC and its affiliates. The healthcare facilities sought to halt NLRB proceedings for alleged unfair labor practices, arguing the NLRB lacked a lawful quorum and the ALJ's appointment was unconstitutional. The court found the plaintiffs could not demonstrate irreparable harm.

In the Matter of F.T. - Police Officer Disqualification Appeal

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed a Civil Service Commission decision removing F.T. from an eligible list for Police Officer due to psychological disqualification. The court upheld the dismissal of F.T.'s appeal based on his failure to timely submit required psychological reports.

State v. Cenesca - Appeal of Post-Conviction Relief Denial

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed an order denying a defendant's petition for post-conviction relief. The defendant appealed previous orders related to his plea counsel's alleged failure to advise him on immigration consequences.

State v. Jovy Delphine - Criminal Appeal

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed a lower court's decision denying a motion to suppress evidence in the case of State v. Jovy Delphine. The court found that the investigating officer had reasonable suspicion for the motor vehicle stop, which led to the seizure of evidence supporting the defendant's conviction.

Goodheart v. Wieder - New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division Opinion

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed the dismissal of a personal injury complaint against American Multi-Cinema, Inc. and Frederick Wieder. The court found the dismissal orders to be proper based on the proceedings below.

New Jersey v. Harris and Thomas - Search Warrant Suppression

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed the suppression of evidence in the case of State of New Jersey v. Carlene Harris and Norman A. Thomas 4th. The court ruled that search warrants were invalid due to stale information in the supporting certification, barring the State from introducing extrinsic evidence to correct the errors.

State of New Jersey v. David Cooper - Criminal Appeal

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed an order denying a post-conviction relief petition filed by defendant David Cooper. The court found no error in the lower court's decision not to conduct an evidentiary hearing on the defendant's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel.

L.R.M. v. T.R.M. - New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division Opinion

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division reversed and remanded a decision denying a final restraining order. The court found cumulative errors in the original hearing concerning allegations of sexual assault and contempt under the Prevention of Domestic Violence Act. The case involves a plaintiff appealing a Family Part order that dismissed her temporary restraining order against her biological father.

Todd Jones v. St. Joseph's University Medical Center - Medical Malpractice

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed a lower court's decision denying a hospital's motion to dismiss a medical malpractice complaint. The court found that the plaintiff had substantially complied with the Affidavit of Merit statute, allowing the case to proceed.

Spotswood v. Middlesex County Prosecutor's Office - Body Camera Recordings

The New Jersey Superior Court issued an opinion in Borough of Spotswood v. Middlesex County Prosecutor's Office concerning the destruction of police body-worn camera recordings. The court addressed whether recordings must be destroyed if officers failed to verbally notify individuals they were being filmed, harmonizing relevant statutes.

State of New Jersey v. Debra Carl - DWI Appeal

The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirmed a de novo conviction for driving while intoxicated (DWI). The defendant appealed, arguing a violation of her speedy trial rights and insufficient evidence of intoxication. The court found the State proved its case and affirmed the conviction.

EMA Draft Guidance on Clinical Trials During Public Health Emergencies

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has published draft guidance for conducting clinical trials during public health emergencies. This guidance, open for consultation until April 30, 2026, aims to streamline the authorization of new trials and modifications to ongoing trials.

Friends of Marconi Plaza v. J. Kenney - Court Opinion

The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania affirmed a lower court's decision to dismiss a complaint filed by Friends of Marconi Plaza against the Mayor of Philadelphia and the Historical Commission. The case concerns the removal of a Christopher Columbus statue and related administrative proceedings.

People v. Del Rosario-Martinez - DWI and Leaving Scene Conviction Affirmed

The Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York affirmed a conviction for driving while impaired and leaving the scene of an incident. The court found the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence and rejected arguments based on new evidence not presented at trial.

EU Legislation and Regulatory Notices - March 5, 2026

The EU published several implementing regulations on March 5, 2026, amending lists related to animal health and restrictive measures. These regulations adjust authorizations for importing animals and animal products and implement sanctions concerning the situation in Sudan.

NY AG Secures Tenant Rights and Affordable Housing for 25 Families

New York Attorney General Letitia James secured new protections and additional compensation for 25 low-income families displaced from their homes. The settlement with Landsman Real Estate Services, Inc. and Landsman Development Corp. addresses improper notice and insufficient relocation payments provided to tenants.

NY AG Secures $271,000 for Tenants and Affordable Housing Protections

New York Attorney General Letitia James secured $271,000 in additional compensation and new protections for 25 low-income families displaced from affordable housing in Rochester. The settlement addresses a landlord's failure to properly notify tenants of their rights and provide sufficient relocation payments.

Cold-Rolled Steel from Korea: Preliminary Countervailing Duty Results

The International Trade Administration published preliminary results for the 2023 administrative review of certain cold-rolled steel flat products from the Republic of Korea. The notice also includes a rescission in part of the review. This action impacts importers and exporters of these steel products.

International Trade Commission Investigation: Electric Unicycles

The International Trade Commission has instituted an investigation into certain gyro-stabilized electric unicycles, components, and products containing them. This action, designated Investigation No. 337-TA-1488, will examine potential violations of U.S. trade laws related to these products.

ICE Arrests Guatemalan National for Employing Illegal Aliens

ICE Homeland Security Investigations arrested Brayan Adiel Gramajo Reyes, a Guatemalan national, for allegedly employing illegal aliens and encouraging illegal entry in Idaho. The investigation also uncovered human trafficking elements, with Gramajo accused of exploiting unaccompanied alien children.

Alien Sentenced for Cartel Drug Operation

ICE Homeland Security Investigations announced the sentencing of Baldemar Navarro-Jaimes to nearly 20 years in prison for leading a cartel-linked drug trafficking operation. The investigation dismantled a multistate narcotics network tied to La Familia Michoacana, resulting in the seizure of significant quantities of drugs and firearms.

Burnley v. Loews Hotel - Court Opinion

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued an opinion in the case of Burnley, D. v. Loews Hotel. The opinion details the court's decision regarding appeals related to a judgment entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County. The case involves multiple parties and appeals concerning liability.

Com. v. Wade, H - Criminal Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a non-precedential decision in Com. v. Wade, H, affirming a judgment of sentence for corrupt organizations and related offenses. The appellant challenged the discretionary aspects of his sentence.

Com. v. Shannon - Criminal Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a non-precedential decision in the case of Commonwealth v. Shannon. The court granted the appellant's counsel's petition to withdraw and affirmed the judgment of sentence, finding the appeal to be frivolous.

Com. v. Johnson, T. - Criminal Law Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a non-precedential decision in the case of Com. v. Johnson, T. The court affirmed the appellant's convictions but vacated the judgment of sentence and remanded for resentencing. The appeal concerned charges including attempted murder and aggravated assault.

Com. v. Johnson, I - Criminal Appeal

The Pennsylvania Superior Court affirmed the judgment of sentence for Ikee Johnson, who was convicted of firearm offenses. The appeal challenged the constitutionality of the firearm possession statute. The court's decision upholds the prior conviction and sentence.