Colorado Court of Appeals Opinion in Peo v SS

The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed a juvenile court's judgment allocating parental responsibilities for a child to the father in a dependency and neglect proceeding. The case involved allegations of abuse, parental relationship volatility, and substance use concerns.

Peo v. Seymour - Colorado Court of Appeals Opinion

The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's order imposing restitution in the case of People v. Seymour. The defendant appealed the restitution amount, arguing procedural errors in its determination. The court found no reversible error.

Peo v. Shea - Colorado Court of Appeals Opinion

The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed the postconviction court's order denying Daniel Richard Shea's motion claiming ineffective assistance of counsel related to his sentencing. The opinion addresses Shea's appeal of his conviction for first degree burglary, second degree kidnapping, and criminal extortion.

People v. Perez - Colorado Court of Appeals Opinion

The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed the postconviction court's order denying George Perez's motion for postconviction relief. The case involved charges including vehicular assault and felony driving under the influence.

People v. Regnier - Colorado Court of Appeals Opinion

The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Timothy Joseph Lloyd Regnier for driving-related crimes and drug possession. The court found no reversible error in the trial court's denial of the motion to suppress statements made by Regnier at the time of his arrest.

People v. Monte - Colorado Court of Appeals Opinion

The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions of Lorenzo Owen Monte for attempted first-degree murder, first-degree assault, and second-degree kidnapping. The opinion, issued on March 5, 2026, addresses Monte's appeal of his convictions and sentences.

People v. Torreyson - Colorado Court of Appeals Opinion

The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Trevor David Torreyson for first-degree murder. The court found no reversible error in the trial proceedings, upholding the jury's verdict and the life sentence without parole.

Estate of Carrillo v. Carrillo - Probate Dispute

The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed a probate court's decision to admit a will into probate, vacate a prior personal representative appointment, and appoint a new personal representative. The appellant's claims regarding the will's validity and undue influence were rejected.

People v. Ahuero - Colorado Court of Appeals Opinion

The Colorado Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal of Stephen J. Ahuero in case number 24CA1412. The dismissal was based on an untimely notice of appeal, preventing the court from addressing the merits of Ahuero's claims regarding ineffective assistance of counsel.

Peo in Interest of EG - Parental Rights Termination

The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed a juvenile court's judgment terminating a mother's parental rights to her child. The mother appealed, arguing the court erred in finding she abandoned the child, but the appellate court found no error.

Peo v. Davis - Colorado Court of Appeals Restitution Order

The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's order requiring Andrew J. Davis to pay $3,879.27 in restitution for medical expenses and lost wages related to an assault. The court found sufficient evidence was presented to support the restitution amount.

Colorado Court of Appeals - Maxwell Estate Real Property Restrictions

The Colorado Court of Appeals ruled on a case concerning restrictions on the sale and use of real property devised in a will. The court held that while restrictions on alienation are not void, the will can be reformed to allow the property to be sold or encumbered consistent with the donor's original purpose.

Colorado Court of Appeals - Dependency and Neglect Proceeding

The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed a juvenile court's judgment allocating parental responsibilities in a dependency and neglect proceeding. The mother appealed the decision to make the father the primary residential parent during the school year, but the court found no error.

Latsis v. Arapahoe - Property Tax Valuation Appeal

The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed a Board of Assessment Appeals decision reducing George Latsis's property valuation for the 2023 tax year from $1,043,100 to $949,000. The court found the BAA's decision was supported by competent evidence.

Marriage of Kline - Colorado Court of Appeals Opinion

The Colorado Court of Appeals issued a non-precedential opinion in the Marriage of Kline case, affirming a district court's order on parental time and decision-making responsibilities. The opinion addresses issues including domestic abuse and coercive control within the context of child custody.

Stoffel v. ICAO - Unemployment Benefits Appeal

The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed an order dismissing Andrew Stoffel's administrative appeal for unemployment benefits. Stoffel failed to appear for a scheduled hearing and filed his appeal beyond the statutory deadline without showing good cause.

Colorado Court of Appeals - Dependency and Neglect Case

The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed a juvenile court's decision denying a father's motion for relief from a judgment terminating his parental rights. The father had sought to withdraw his confession to termination, alleging he did not receive promised communication and access to the child.

CMA Clears Constellation's Purchase of Aston Barclay Merger

The UK's Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has cleared Constellation Developments Limited's acquisition of ABVR Holdings Limited (Aston Barclay). The decision follows an in-depth phase 2 investigation which found the merger would not substantially reduce competition in the UK used vehicle auction market.

DOJ Report on USA PATRIOT Act Implementation

The Department of Justice's Office of the Inspector General has released a report to Congress detailing the implementation of Section 1001 of the USA PATRIOT Act. The report, posted on March 5, 2026, fulfills a statutory requirement for oversight and transparency regarding the Act's application.

GSA Experts to Attend Defense Technology Industry Event

The U.S. General Services Administration announced that GSA experts will attend the Armed Forces Communications and Electronics Association's 50th New Horizons 2026 event from March 9-11, 2026. The event provides networking and learning opportunities for small businesses interested in federal contracting.

Diesel Generators Procurement for Ukraine

The UK's Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, through the Partnership Fund for a Resilient Ukraine, has published a notice for the supply of diesel generators. The procurement opportunity closes on March 20, 2026.

Trustees of Dennis Pines Condominium Trust v. Patten - Case Reinstatement and Final Judgment

The U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts granted the United States' motion to reinstate a case and enter a final judgment. The court denied a motion to stay the order dismissing the case.

Tewksbury Living Group, LLC v. KCP Advisory Group, LLC - Civil Action

The US District Court for Massachusetts issued an order in the civil action Tewksbury Living Group, LLC, et al. v. KCP Advisory Group, LLC and EF Senior Living Management, LLC. This case arises from the receivership and closure of a senior living facility.

Rafiq v. Bowers - Habeas Petition Granted in Part

The District Court for the District of Massachusetts granted in part Shamoon Rafiq's habeas petition challenging a BOP disciplinary hearing. The court denied the motion to dismiss and granted the petition on two of three claims, impacting the petitioner's good time credits.

California Fines TheBeadChest.com $17,000 for Excessive Lead

The California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) has fined online retailer TheBeadChest.com $17,000 for selling jewelry with excessive lead levels. The retailer has agreed to stop selling non-compliant jewelry.

FDA Warning Letter to Premium Health Management

The FDA issued a warning letter to Premium Health Management Inc. for misbranding compounded semaglutide and tirzepatide products. The company's website made false or misleading claims about the products, suggesting they were compounded by Premium Health when they were not, and implying FDA approval or evaluation.

Correction to Federal Reserve Rules Regarding Delegation of Authority

The Federal Reserve System has issued a correction to its rules regarding the delegation of authority. This correction amends 12 CFR Part 265 and was published in the Federal Register on March 5, 2026.

Avian Influenza Detected in Domestic Flock

The Massachusetts Department of Agricultural Resources (MDAR) announced the detection of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) in a domestic flock in Dukes County. This marks the second domestic flock in Massachusetts to test positive this year. MDAR is advising poultry owners to implement strong biosecurity measures to prevent exposure.

State AGs Sue Trump Administration Over Tariffs

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong, joined by 22 other states and two governors, has filed a lawsuit challenging the Trump administration's latest round of tariffs. The lawsuit argues these tariffs, imposed without congressional approval, are illegal and increase costs for American consumers and businesses.

Fredis Ortez Reyes v. USCIS - Immigration Jurisdiction

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed and remanded a district court's decision, holding that courts do have jurisdiction to review immigration judge decisions based solely on statutory interpretation. The case involves a denial of a derivative asylee status petition based on a prior removal order.

US v. Manger Blackmon - Criminal Appeal

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Manger Blackmon for being a felon in possession of a firearm. The court found that any error in not having a jury determine the 'occasions' for prior violent felonies was harmless, upholding the mandatory minimum sentence.

US v. Jose Duran Garcia - Appeal Affirmed

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial of Jose Duran Garcia's motion to suppress evidence. The court found that the search of the bus luggage compartment, based on a drug dog's alert, was lawful. Duran Garcia had pleaded guilty after his motion to suppress was denied.

United States v. Sergio Carrillo Murillo - Affirmation of Conviction

The Fourth Circuit affirmed the conviction of Sergio Carrillo Murillo in a published opinion. This decision is the second appeal in his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceedings, addressing claims of ineffective assistance of counsel related to his guilty plea and potential deportation.

Citizens Property Insurance Corporation Rate Filings Final Order

The Florida Office of Insurance Regulation has issued a final order regarding rate filings from Citizens Property Insurance Corporation. This order establishes the rates for personal and commercial property insurance lines, ensuring they meet statutory requirements for actuarial soundness and market function.

Cleveland v. Johnson - Traffic Violation Discovery Dispute

The Ohio Court of Appeals reversed and remanded a traffic violation conviction for Stephen-E Johnson. The court found the trial court abused its discretion by proceeding to trial without allowing discovery and by not compelling the appellee to provide discovery to the appellant.

In re A.P. - Child Support Appeal Dismissed

The Ohio Court of Appeals dismissed an appeal filed by Father A.P. regarding a child support order. The court found that the father improperly attempted to "bootstrap" the denial of a second motion to vacate to appeal the denial of his first motion, which was untimely.

Ohio Court of Appeals Affirms Termination of Parental Rights

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a juvenile court's decision terminating a mother's parental rights and granting permanent custody to Lucas County Children Services for six of her nine children. The court found no error in the juvenile court's judgment.

State v. Holmes - Evidence, Fraud, Legal Arguments

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed convictions for interfering with civil rights, dereliction of duty, tampering with records, and telecommunications fraud in State v. Holmes. The court found sufficient evidence for the convictions but noted an error in the verdict form for tampering with records, deeming it plain error but not grounds for reversal.

State v. Washington - Rape, Kidnapping Convictions Challenged

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed the rape and kidnapping convictions of Eric Washington. The court found that Washington waived his statute of limitations defense by failing to raise it before the trial court, despite the state initially filing a John Doe indictment years prior to naming him.

State v. Ferrelli - Trial Court Lacked Authority for Minor Misdemeanor Probation

The Ohio Court of Appeals ruled that a trial court lacked statutory authority to impose probation for a minor misdemeanor offense. The appellate court reversed the lower court's judgment and remanded the case for resentencing, noting that probation is not a permissible sentencing option for minor misdemeanors in Ohio.

State v. McInnes - Ohio Court of Appeals Opinion

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions and sentence of Ian W. McInnes. The court addressed issues including the burden of proof for affirmative defenses, admissibility of lay opinion testimony, sufficiency of evidence, confrontation rights, Garrity statements, grand-jury transcripts, and sentencing.

State v. Jackson - Ohio Court of Appeals Opinion

The Ohio Court of Appeals reversed a conviction for endangering children in the case of State v. Jackson. The court found that the state failed to establish that the appellant created a substantial risk to the health or safety of the child as required by statute.

State v. Gill - Weapons Charge Acquittal

The Ohio Court of Appeals reversed a trial court's denial of a motion for acquittal on weapons charges for Lee Gill. The court found insufficient evidence presented by the state for both the weapons under disability and tampering with evidence charges, entering a judgment of acquittal.

Mitchell Family Trust Fund v. Cole - Summary Judgment Vacated

The Ohio Court of Appeals vacated a trial court's decision granting summary judgment on third-party claims. The appellate court remanded the case with instructions to deem the third-party claims and the summary judgment motion moot, as they were derivative of the primary claims.

Price v. Price - Ohio Court of Appeals Opinion

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's judgment in the case of Price v. Price. The appellate court found no merit in the appellant's arguments regarding summary judgment, land installment contract law, and jurisdiction over personal property.

Shaker Hts. v. Patterson - Traffic Violation Appeal

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision finding Larry Reginald Patterson guilty of two traffic violations. Patterson's appeal, which raised issues of discovery violations and alleged financial instrument irregularities, was denied as he failed to file a transcript and raise issues properly on appeal.

University Heights v Weizman - Public Nuisance Case

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision finding a property a public nuisance and appointing a receiver. The court found the property unfit for habitation and a fire hazard, upholding the appointment of a receiver to manage abatement prior to a full repair estimate.

Yates v. Rigby - Appellate Review of Divorce

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's divorce judgment in Yates v. Rigby. The appellate court presumed the regularity of proceedings and affirmed due to the appellant's failure to provide a transcript and lack of cognizable legal argument.

State v. Green - Motion to Withdraw Guilty Plea

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a conviction for second-degree robbery in State v. Green. The court ruled that a motion to withdraw a guilty plea was outside the scope of the appeal as it was filed in a related trial court case. The court also found no error in imposing the maximum sentence.

Cleveland v. Shaker Heights Apartments Owner, LLC - Housing Court Abuse of Discretion

The Ohio Court of Appeals reversed a housing court's denial of the City of Cleveland's motion to dismiss charges against Shaker Heights Apartments Owner, LLC. The appellate court found the housing court abused its discretion by not allowing the City to argue facts and by partially applying the test for good cause, remanding the case to grant the dismissal.