Changeflow GovPing

What do you monitor?

Curated feeds for your role. Pick your area and get exactly the sources you need.

Recent changes

Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Ribstein v. Marx - Civil Harassment Restraining Order Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, affirmed an order granting a civil harassment restraining order (CHRO) against the appellant. The case involves allegations of fraud and a subsequent petition for a CHRO.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

People v. Ortega - Criminal Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Two, filed a non-precedential opinion in the case of People v. Ortega. The court affirmed the judgments and sentences of defendants Daniel Ortega, Alfonso Keer, and Jaime Chacon, who were convicted of murder.

Routine Enforcement Criminal Justice
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

People v. Stewart - Sentencing Error on Manslaughter and Attempted Murder Charges

The California Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, vacated the sentence for Steele Stewart in case C102503. The court found that the trial court erred by aggravating Stewart's sentence based on underlying facts that were not properly proven or admitted, and has remanded the matter for resentencing.

Priority review Enforcement Criminal Justice
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

De La Torre v. CashCall - Unconscionable Interest Rates Ruling

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court's ruling that CashCall's high interest rates (96%-135%) on subprime loans were unconscionable. The court ordered restitution for class members and enjoined collection efforts on these loans.

Priority review Enforcement Consumer Protection
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Woodhouse v. State Bar of Cal. - Vexatious Litigant Ruling

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court's finding that Benjamin Woodhouse is a vexatious litigant. The court held his complaint lacked merit and affirmed orders barring him from future self-represented suits without pre-filing approval and security. This ruling impacts Woodhouse's ability to file future lawsuits.

Priority review Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

People v. Rogers - California Court of Appeal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal has issued an opinion in the case of People v. Rogers. This document is a non-precedential opinion related to a specific legal case. The court has not identified any known citations or subsequent legal actions directly related to this opinion.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

People v. Sierra - Criminal Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, filed an opinion in the case of People v. Sierra. The court affirmed the judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, upholding the conviction of first-degree kidnapping and murder. The appeal concerned the admission of prior uncharged misconduct evidence.

Routine Enforcement Criminal Justice
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Pomona Valley Hospital Med. Center v. Kaiser Foundation - Medical Reimbursement Dispute

The California Court of Appeal reversed in part and remanded a judgment concerning a medical reimbursement dispute between Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center and Kaiser Foundation Health Plan. The case involves approximately $66 million in asserted unreimbursed emergency medical services provided by the hospital to Kaiser members.

Priority review Enforcement Healthcare
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

People v. Quijano - Non-Precedential Opinion

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court's denial of a resentencing petition filed by Maria Quijano under Penal Code section 1172.6. The court found Quijano ineligible for relief as a matter of law based on her conviction for conspiracy to commit murder and first-degree murder with a special circumstance finding.

Routine Enforcement Criminal Justice
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

People v. Sims - Criminal Convictions Appeal

The California Court of Appeal affirmed in part and modified a criminal judgment for Kyle Richard Sims. The court found the evidence insufficient for certain aggravating circumstances related to drug quantities but otherwise upheld the jury's verdicts. The judgment was modified regarding sentencing terms and conduct credits.

Routine Enforcement Criminal Justice

Showing 26101–26110 of 28,220 changes

1 2609 2610 2611 2612 2613 2822

Get alerts when regulations change

Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.