Texas Court of Appeals Affirms Child Termination of Parental Rights

The Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District, affirmed a trial court's order terminating the parental rights of a mother and father. The appellate court found the mother's appeal to be frivolous and without merit, following procedures outlined in Anders v. California.

Wally Yammine v. Warren Fonville, PLLC - Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

The Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District, has dismissed the appeal in Wally Yammine v. Warren Fonville, PLLC, for want of jurisdiction. The court found that the appellant, acting as executor, lacked the capacity to represent the estate in the appeal.

Tony Chavez v. State of Texas - Habeas Corpus - Bail Dismissed

The Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District, dismissed Tony Chavez's original proceeding seeking a bond reduction. The court found it lacked original habeas jurisdiction in criminal cases, as such jurisdiction is limited to county courts, district courts, and the Court of Criminal Appeals. The proceeding was dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Griffin Energy Law v. Billingsley - Real Estate Title Dispute

The Texas Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's decision in a real estate title dispute concerning mineral interests. The court found that the appellees successfully rebutted the community property presumption with clear and convincing evidence, upholding the judgment in their favor.

CMA Considers Energy Licence Appeal Decision Deadline

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) is considering appeals from 5 energy companies against modifications to gas distribution licences made by Ofgem. The CMA is expected to decide whether to grant permission to appeal by 31 March 2026.

Draft Guidance: Responding to FDA Form 483 Observations for Drug Manufacturers

The FDA has issued draft guidance for drug manufacturers on how to respond to observations noted on FDA Form 483 following CGMP inspections. This guidance is intended to assist domestic and foreign manufacturers in assessing conformity with CGMP requirements.

Colorado Warns of Online Investment Scams During Consumer Protection Week

The Colorado Division of Securities issued a warning about online investment scams during National Consumer Protection Week. The notice highlights common schemes like unsolicited cryptocurrency fraud and romance scams, referencing FTC data on significant financial losses to these activities.

Thomas v. Rodgers et al - Securities/Commodities Civil Case

A new civil case, Thomas v. Rodgers et al., was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on March 6, 2026. The case involves securities and commodities and includes a Verified Stockholder Derivative Complaint.

Legends Bank v. Orusa - Appeal Dismissed for Late Filing

The Tennessee Court of Appeals dismissed an appeal filed by Samson Orusa against Legends Bank and the Tennessee Department of Revenue. The dismissal was due to the appellant failing to file the notice of appeal with the Appellate Court Clerk within the mandatory 30-day period after the order was entered.

State-Funded Cleanup Enables New Affordable Housing

The California Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) announced the opening of 43 new affordable homes in Richmond, funded by a state cleanup program. This project is part of a larger initiative to convert contaminated land into safe housing, with over 200 homes expected across three sites this year.

Freedom of Information Act Implementing Regulations Updated

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has updated its Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) implementing regulations. These changes aim to enhance clarity and efficiency in processing FOIA requests. The rule is effective March 6, 2026.

State AG Criticizes Aquarion Sale Approval, Citing Doubled Water Bills

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong criticized the Public Utilities Regulatory Authority's preliminary approval of the Aquarion water company sale to a nonprofit, projecting doubled water bills for consumers. The decision reverses a prior denial and is expected to significantly impact public oversight and consumer protections.

US v. John McLaurin - Criminal Case Vacated and Remanded

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated and remanded the criminal case of US v. John McLaurin. The court found that discretionary supervised release conditions not orally pronounced at sentencing are nullities, impacting the revocation judgment. The case is remanded for resentencing.

Cedar Coal Company v. Director, DOWCP - Black Lung Benefits Decision

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals denied Cedar Coal Company's petition to review an order awarding black lung benefits to the estate of Roger L. Mullins. The court found that the Administrative Law Judge's decision was supported by substantial evidence and that the claimant presented sufficient evidence within regulatory limitations.

State v. Lanier - Ohio Court of Appeals Affirms Trial Judgment

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's judgment in the consolidated cases of State v. Lanier. The court found that the record clearly and convincingly supported the trial court's findings regarding the sentences imposed on the appellant.

State v. Norman - Resentencing Remand

The Ohio Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the case of State v. Norman for resentencing. The trial court failed to provide required notifications under the Reagan Tokes Act during the initial sentencing. The judgment is affirmed in all other respects.

State v. Johnson - Appeal Dismissed as Moot

The Ohio Court of Appeals dismissed an appeal in State v. Johnson as moot because the appellant had already served his jail sentence. The court noted that the appeal concerned a judgment revoking community control sanctions.

State v. Trotter - Criminal Appeal

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's judgment in State v. Trotter, finding that the appellant's plea of no contest was voluntary and knowingly made. The court addressed an assignment of error regarding ineffective assistance of counsel.

State v. Dominguez-Olivia - Speedy Trial and Due Process Rights

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a defendant's convictions, ruling that his statutory and constitutional speedy trial rights, as well as his due process rights, were not violated. The court found sufficient evidence supported the convictions and that they were not against the manifest weight of the evidence.

State v. Giron - Motion to Suppress OVI

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's decision in State v. Giron, denying a motion to suppress evidence in an OVI case. The court found reasonable suspicion for the traffic stop and probable cause for the arrest, and permitted an amendment to the OVI charge without prejudice to the defendant.

State v. Wilson - Public Records Denial

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's decision denying a defendant's motions for public records. The court found the motions were barred by res judicata and the information sought was not necessary for a justiciable claim.

State v. Johnson - Child Victim Testimony Statute Violation

The Ohio Court of Appeals reversed and vacated parts of a trial court's judgment against Chadwick Johnson, finding that the trial court violated Johnson's right to confrontation by allowing child victims to testify outside his presence without proper findings. The appellate court remanded the case for a new trial on specific charges due to insufficient evidence.

State v. Fogle - Dog Bite Restitution Upheld

The Ohio Court of Appeals upheld a trial court's order for restitution of $265.92 against Ellen Fogle, whose dog bit a neighbor and attacked the neighbor's dog. The court found sufficient evidence to support the restitution order in this consolidated appeal.

State v. Kynard - Criminal Sentencing Appeal

The Ohio Court of Appeals reversed a trial court's judgment regarding consecutive sentencing. The case is remanded for the limited purpose of providing post-release control notification to the defendant. The court found the original sentencing order improperly imposed a consecutive sentence to another unsentenced case.

Finn v. Rutherford - Landlord-Tenant Dispute Affirmed

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's judgment in Finn v. Rutherford, a landlord-tenant dispute. The appellate court found that the appellant failed to present objections to the magistrate's decision and did not file a transcript, preventing a review of the merits.

NVR, Inc. v. Pearce - Motion for Reargument Denied

The Delaware Superior Court denied a defendant's motion for reargument in the case of NVR, Inc. v. Pearce. The court found that the defendant raised new arguments for the first time and that the original judgment was valid, denying the motion for reconsideration.

Careen, Inc. v. ZeroAvia, Inc. - Contract Dispute

Careen, Inc. has filed a civil complaint against ZeroAvia, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, Case Number 5:26-cv-01986, was filed on March 6, 2026, and pertains to a contract dispute. Initial filings include the complaint and proposed summons.

State of Tennessee v. John Bassett - Murder Conviction Appeal

The Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed John Bassett's murder conviction but reversed his life sentence without parole. The case is remanded for resentencing. The court found insufficient evidence to support the enhanced sentence based on the murder being especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel.

Tennessee v. Smith - Affirmation of Murder and Theft Convictions

The Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the convictions of Raymond Antonio Smith for first-degree premeditated murder and theft. The court found sufficient evidence to support the convictions and the value of the stolen property. The defendant is serving a life sentence plus twelve years.

Cedric Hopgood v. State of Tennessee - Plea Withdrawal Denial

The Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed a trial court's denial of Cedric Hopgood's motion to withdraw his guilty pleas for drug possession offenses. The court found no error in the denial, upholding the agreed-upon sentence.

State of Tennessee v. Vidal Chad Bryant - Drug and Firearm Offenses Sentencing Appeal

The Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the trial court's denial of Vidal Chad Bryant's motion to suspend his six-year sentence for drug and firearm offenses. The court found no abuse of discretion in the trial court's decision.

Keepmoat Homes Environmental Permit Application Consultation

The Environment Agency has published a consultation notice regarding an environmental permit application submitted by Keepmoat Homes Limited for a site in Leyland, Lancashire. The notice details the application and explains the public participation process.

Sydney Wheeler Environmental Permit Application Consultation

The Environment Agency is advertising an environmental permit application for Sydney Wheeler in Lydney, England. This notice initiates a public consultation period, allowing interested parties to review the application and submit comments before a decision is made.

Angus Fire PFAS Reduction Permit Consultation

The Environment Agency has opened a public consultation on its draft decision to grant a permit variation to Angus Fire Limited. The variation would allow the company to install an effluent treatment plant to reduce PFAS contamination from rainwater runoff at its North Yorkshire site. The consultation period runs until April 1, 2026.

NINDS Rescinds Policy on Special Council Review of Research Applications

The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) has issued a notice rescinding its policy on Special Council Review of Research Applications, effective immediately. This rescission refers applicants to the broader NIH policy on the same matter.

AHRQ Health Services Research Dissertation Program (R36) Expired

The Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality (AHRQ) has issued a notice announcing the immediate expiration of the Health Services Research Dissertation Program (R36), previously identified by PA-23-196. No further applications will be accepted under this funding opportunity announcement.

AHRQ Health Services Grants PA-24-156 Expiration Notice

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) has issued a notice announcing the early expiration of Funding Opportunity Announcement PA-24-156 for Health Services Research Demonstration and Dissemination Grants (R18). No further applications will be accepted under this announcement.

AHRQ Notice: Primary Care Research R01 Funding Opportunity Expired

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) has issued a notice announcing the early expiration of the Research to Advance the Science of Primary Care (R01) funding opportunity announcement (PA-24-205). No further applications will be accepted under this announcement.

AHRQ Primary Care Research Funding Opportunity Expired

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) has issued a notice announcing the early expiration of funding opportunity PA-23-115, 'AHRQ Small Research Projects to Advance the Science of Primary Care (R03)'. No further applications will be accepted under this announcement.

State v. Sundwall - Utah Court of Appeals Opinion

The Utah Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision to deny bail to Meggan Randall Sundwall, who is charged with aggravated murder and obstruction of justice. The appellate court found that the district court did not err in determining that Sundwall posed a flight risk based on clear and convincing evidence.

State v. Alvarez - Utah Court of Appeals Opinion

The Utah Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions of Jose Humberto Mancia, Argenis Daniel Ramirez Saedt, and Rosalio Andres Alvarez for two counts of murder. The defendants appealed, arguing ineffective assistance of counsel, but the court found no merit in these claims.

State v. Saedt - Criminal Appeal

The Utah Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions of Jose Humberto Mancia, Argenis Daniel Ramirez Saedt, and Rosalio Andres Alvarez for two counts of murder. The defendants appealed, arguing ineffective assistance of counsel, but the court found no merit in their claims.

State v. Devore - Utah Court of Appeals Opinion

The Utah Court of Appeals affirmed an order for additional restitution against Christopher Earl Devore. Devore was ordered to pay nearly $30,000 for a victim's nasal reconstruction surgery, stemming from a 2018 burglary conviction. The court found Devore's arguments regarding the timeliness of the restitution request and the proximate cause of the injury unpersuasive.

State v. Mancia - Utah Court of Appeals Opinion

The Utah Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions of Jose Humberto Mancia, Argenis Daniel Ramirez Saedt, and Rosalio Andres Alvarez for two counts of murder. The defendants appealed, arguing ineffective assistance of counsel, but the court found no merit in their claims.

State v. Anderson - Utah Court of Appeals Opinion

The Utah Court of Appeals filed an opinion in State v. Anderson on March 5, 2026. The case involves a challenge to the denial of a motion to suppress evidence found during a vehicle search following an arrest on outstanding warrants. The court affirmed the lower court's decision.

Reese v. Reese - Utah Court of Appeals Child Support Ruling

The Utah Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's denial of a motion to set aside a child support provision in a divorce decree. The appellant argued the provision was void due to being part of a postnuptial agreement, but the court found the statute cited applied only to premarital agreements.

Mcaneeley v. Fukushima - Harassment Injunction Appeal

The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals is reviewing an appeal filed by Doreen Fukushima against an injunction against harassment issued by the District Court of the First Circuit. Fukushima argues the injunction violated her constitutional rights. The court's decision will impact the application of harassment laws and due process in the state.

Hawai'i Government Employees Association v. Department of Public Safety - Court Opinion Correction

The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals has issued an order correcting minor typographical errors in its August 18, 2025 opinion in Hawai'i Government Employees Association v. Department of Public Safety. The corrections involve specific word changes and formatting adjustments within the published text.

Hircajo III v. State - Court Opinion

The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals issued an opinion on March 6, 2026, in Hircajo III v. State. The court dismissed a motion for reconsideration as untimely, citing the Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Newtown Estates Community Association v. Walk the Good Life, LLC - Appeal

The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's judgment in favor of Newtown Estates Community Association against Walk the Good Life, LLC. The case involved alleged violations of community association Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions.