Search

State v. Brooklyn Paige Grimes - Habeas Corpus Bail Denial

The Supreme Court of Alabama denied petitions for writs of habeas corpus filed by Brooklyn Paige Grimes and Mason John Grimes. The petitioners sought bail while awaiting trial on a capital murder charge, but the court affirmed the denial of bail.

Supreme Court of Alabama Opinion - Woodrow Carter v. Austin Moore et al.

The Supreme Court of Alabama granted a petition for a writ of mandamus, directing the circuit court to grant a motion for a change of venue in a case involving an insurance claim dispute. The court found that the defendant, a claims representative, was improperly sued in Dallas County when his work primarily occurred in Mobile County.

Alabama v. Grimes - Habeas Corpus for Capital Murder Bail Denial

The Supreme Court of Alabama denied petitions for writs of habeas corpus filed by Mason John Grimes and Brooklyn Paige Grimes. The petitioners sought release on bail while awaiting trial for capital murder charges. The court found no error in the denial of bail.

Craig Ataide v. Selene Finance, LP - Civil Case Filing

A civil case has been filed against Selene Finance, LP, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, docketed as 3:26-cv-02226, was filed on March 13, 2026, with a basis in Diversity and concerning Real Property. The filing includes a complaint and summons.

In re O.F. - Juvenile Court Transfer Amenability

The California Court of Appeal reversed a juvenile court's order to transfer a minor to criminal court. The decision was based on subsequent retroactive changes in law, specifically AB 2361 and SB 545, which altered the burden of proof and mandatory factors for determining amenability to rehabilitation.

People v. Martinez - Criminal Resentencing Appeal

The California Court of Appeal reversed a resentencing order for Santiago Martinez, Jr. The court found the trial court abused its discretion by denying a continuance to obtain necessary documents from the California Department of Corrections, prejudicing the defendant. The case is remanded for a new resentencing hearing.

People v. Burnham - Criminal Appeal on Felony Murder Liability

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court's decision denying a resentencing petition under Penal Code section 1172.6. The court found the defendant was a major participant in a murder who acted with reckless indifference to human life, thus remaining liable under current felony murder rules. The appeal also addressed the admissibility of a hearsay statement regarding the shooter's identity.

People v. Anderson - California Court of Appeal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court's decision in People v. Anderson, ruling that evidence obtained from a cell phone search without a warrant did not require suppression under the California Electronic Communications Privacy Act (CalECPA). The case involved a robbery where evidence from a deceased accomplice's phone implicated the defendants.

Niemann v. LVNV Funding CA6 - Consumer Debt Standing

The California Court of Appeal reversed a trial court's dismissal of a consumer class action, ruling that the Fair Debt Buying Practices Act confers standing regardless of actual harm. The case involves LVNV Funding, LLC and alleged violations of the Act's notice requirements.

People v. Price - Postjudgment Order Resentencing

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a postjudgment order resentencing Shantic Price under Senate Bill No. 483. The resentencing struck two one-year prior prison term enhancements, reducing his sentence from 52 years to life to 50 years to life, but upheld his firearm enhancement and prior strike convictions.