Search

State v. Street - Theft and Receiving Stolen Property Convictions

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's judgment convicting Joshua Street of theft and receiving stolen property. The court found no plain error in failing to merge the convictions, as the later use of the stolen credit card caused separate harm.

State v. Wang - Plea Validity and Sentencing

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed the validity of a guilty plea in State v. Wang but reversed the imposition of post-release control at sentencing. The court found the trial court complied with Crim.R. 11(C) regarding the plea.

State v. Roper - Enforcement of Settlement Agreement

The Ohio Court of Appeals upheld a trial court's decision to enforce a settlement agreement in a debt collection case. The court found that the agreed-upon terms were clear and constituted a valid contract, affirming the judgment against the appellant. The original debt was for $10,199.02.

State v. Rivers - Felony Sentencing Appeal Affirmed

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a felony sentencing appeal in State v. Rivers. The court found that the trial court properly considered sentencing statutes and that the imposed sentence was not contrary to law. The appellant's conviction involved drug possession offenses.

State v. Jones - Ohio Court of Appeals Opinion

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's conviction of Kiante Jones for obstructing official business. The court found no irreconcilable conflict between the obstructing official business statute and the resisting arrest statute, upholding the State's discretion in charging decisions.

In re Estate of Troutman - Probate Court Erred Vacating Heirship Judgment

The Ohio Court of Appeals reversed a probate court's decision to vacate a 2003 heirship judgment. The appellate court found the judgment was potentially voidable, not void, and that the probate court erred in vacating it under its inherent authority. The ruling impacts the administration of the Estate of Roger Troutman.

State v. Hurt - New Trial Motion Based on Newly Discovered Evidence

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's denial of a new trial motion based on newly discovered evidence in State v. Hurt. The appellate court found no prejudicial error in the trial court's determination that the defendant was not unavoidably prevented from discovering a codefendant's confession within the required timeframe.

H.A. v. J.A. - Ohio Court of Appeals Domestic Violence Opinion

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a domestic violence civil protection order (DVCPO) against the appellant. The court found sufficient evidence that the appellee feared imminent serious physical harm, upholding the trial court's decision to grant the DVCPO despite a magistrate's recommendation against it.

Ohio Court of Appeals rules on unlawful detention during traffic stop

The Ohio Court of Appeals reversed a trial court's decision to suppress evidence, ruling that a defendant fleeing from a traffic stop did not prolong the detention unlawfully. The court found the stop was terminated by the defendant's actions before any unlawful extension could occur.

Bell v. Ohio Living Communities - Summary Judgment Affirmed

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Ohio Living Communities. The court found that the appellant failed to meet their burden by not disclosing an expert report by the deadline, and thus could not meet the reciprocal burden.