Changeflow GovPing US Courts

Recent changes

Favicon for www.ca9.uscourts.gov

USA v. DePape - Affirming Criminal Sentence

The Ninth Circuit affirmed David Wayne DePape's criminal sentence, holding that a sentencing court can correct an error in failing to afford a defendant the right to allocute under Fed. R. Crim. P. 32 by re-sentencing under Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(a). The court found this correction to be an "other clear error" under Rule 35(a).

Priority review Enforcement Criminal Justice
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Debtor avoids judgment liens under § 522(f)(1)(A) for homestead exemption

The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado granted a debtor's motion to avoid judgment liens under 11 U.S.C. § 522(f)(1)(A). The court found that the liens impaired the debtor's homestead exemption, allowing for their removal from the property.

Routine Enforcement Bankruptcy
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

In re Wilbur Arnold Young - Chapter 7 to 13 Conversion Denied

The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado denied a Chapter 7 debtor's motion to convert his case to Chapter 13. The court found the conversion request was made in bad faith and the debtor lacked the means to fund the proposed Chapter 13 plan.

Priority review Enforcement Bankruptcy
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

State of Louisiana v. Shonnon Esteen - Affirmation of Conviction

The Louisiana Court of Appeal affirmed the sentences and convictions of Shonnon Esteen in docket number 2025-KA-0388. Judge Lobrano concurred in the result. The court's decision upholds the prior ruling on appeal.

Routine Enforcement Criminal Justice
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

State of Louisiana v. Shonnon Esteen - Rape and Sexual Battery Convictions Affirmed

The Louisiana Court of Appeal affirmed the sentences and convictions of Shonnon Esteen for two counts of second-degree rape and sexual battery. The alleged offenses occurred between 2006 and 2010. The court found no reversible error in the trial court's proceedings.

Priority review Enforcement Criminal Justice
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Sixth Circuit Affirms Policy Permits Depreciation Deduction in Insurance Claim

The Sixth Circuit affirmed a district court's decision, ruling that an insurance policy permitted the insurer to deduct depreciation from repair cost payouts. The court found that the policy's language authorized this practice, upholding the insurer's claim handling.

Priority review Enforcement Insurance
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Sixth Circuit Upholds Opioid Conviction of Dr. Michael Fletcher

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Dr. Michael Fletcher for distributing controlled substances. The court found sufficient evidence to support the convictions related to opioid prescriptions issued from his Kentucky pain clinic and upheld the denial of his motion for a new trial.

Priority review Enforcement Healthcare
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Keller v. EBAY HEALTH & WELFARE BENEFITS PLAN - ERISA

Matthew Keller has filed a complaint against the EBAY HEALTH & WELFARE BENEFITS PLAN in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, identified by Case Number 3:26-cv-02622, is based on a Federal Question and falls under the Nature of Suit category of Labor: E.R.I.S.A. The complaint was filed on March 25, 2026.

Priority review Enforcement Employment & Labor
Favicon for ww3.ca2.uscourts.gov

US v. Fabian - Crack Cocaine Conviction and Sentence Appeal

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a conviction for crack cocaine distribution but vacated the imposition of standard supervised release conditions. The court remanded the case to the district court to ensure the defendant is made aware of these conditions.

Priority review Enforcement Criminal Justice
Favicon for ww3.ca2.uscourts.gov

Knapp v. Barclays - Securities Act of 1933 Claims

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's dismissal of claims against Barclays PLC and its executives under the Securities Act of 1933. The court found that a reverse stock split of exchange-traded notes did not constitute a "sale" under Section 12, and investors failed to trace their post-split notes to a specific registration statement for Section 11 claims.

Priority review Enforcement Securities

Showing 1041–1050 of 7,169 changes

1 103 104 105 106 107 717

Get US Courts alerts

Daily digest of regulatory changes. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Get US Courts alerts

We'll email you when new US Courts regulatory changes are detected.

Optional. Personalizes your daily digest.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.